DOCSLIB.ORG

INSIDE Zephyrhills Municipal Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INSIDE Zephyrhills Municipal Airport News from the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Office Florida Flyer www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation Fall 2012 INSIDE 2 2012 Florida Aviation Awards Winners of the 2012 Florida Aviation Awards were announced at the annual Florida Airports Council Conference Photograph by Nathan Coleman Zephyrhills Municipal Airport’s mission is “to provide quality services to our tenants 3 and visitors.” The Process of Zephyrhills Municipal Preparing Airport Master Plans Airport Important information about preparing and updating your Airport Master Plan ephyrhills Municipal Airport (ZPH) bivouac, a military history event located Zserves the general aviation needs of on the airfield in mid-February. the residents of Pasco County as well as With an average annual tempera- Hernando, Hillsborough, and Pinellas ture of 72 degrees, 20 miles of shore- counties in central Florida. Located one line on the Gulf Coast, and more than 8 mile southeast of Zephyrhills, the air- 100,000 acres of forests, Pasco County Florida Aviation port offers convenient access to popu- provides plenty of opportunities for out- lar business and tourist destinations in door activities. Database: 2012 Orlando, 40 miles to the east, and the Tampa Bay area, 20 miles to the south. Two asphalt runways Update Pasco County attractions include Zephyrhills Municipal Airport’s We are focusing our efforts a golf tournament, several annual fes- two converging asphalt runways can to improve four areas of the tivals (kumquat in January, seafood in accommodate mid-sized general avia- Florida Aviation Database the spring, “barbecue and blues” in the tion business jet aircraft. Runway 04/22 fall), and other family friendly events is 5,001 feet long by 100 feet wide, and throughout the year. The World War II Barracks Museum hosts an annual See Zephyrhills, page 6 2012 Florida Aviation Awards Richard Biter, FDOT’s Assistant Sec- retary for Intermodal Systems Devel- opment, and Aaron Smith, FDOT’s State Aviation Manager, announced the winners of the 2012 Florida Aviation Awards at the Florida Airports Council Conference in July in Naples. Aviation Professional Chris Rozansky, C.M. Chris Rozansky, C.M., Airport Ad- ministrator, Venice Municipal Airport, Above left: General Aviation Airport: Naples Municipal Airport; Richard Biter, began his career in Florida during a very FDOT’s Assistant Secretary for Intermodal Systems Development; Ted Soliday, Execu- difficult time for the airport and com- tive Director, City of Naples Airport Authority; Aaron Smith, FDOT’s State Aviation munity. His determination and profes- Manager. Above right: Commercial Service Airport: Southwest Florida Interna- sionalism led to the resolution of many tional Airport; Richard Biter; Bob Ball, A.A.E., Executive Director, Southwest Florida long-standing controversial issues, in- International Airport; Aaron Smith. cluding the Airport Layout Plan and the airport’s capital improvement program. Chris Rozansky was instrumental in to bring new businesses to the airport, Commercial Service Airport undertaking plans for a complete reha- thereby increasing job opportunities and Southwest Florida Int’l Airport bilitation of the airfield to include many economic growth. Southwest Florida International safety and noise mitigation efforts. This airport observes the lat- Airport was certified for operation in He facilitated the approval of an up- est security directives and exceeds all May 1983 and has consistently outpaced dated fee schedule, establishing rent for Transportation Security Administration all growth projections with a state-of- new T-hangars, and added two new fees requirements for a general aviation air- the-art terminal that was constructed to enhance the airport’s ability to be fi- port. The majority of all taxiways have and opened in September 2005. The air- nancially self-sufficient. been rehabilitated during the last four port is ranked in the top 50 busiest air- Through his direction and commit- years. Runway 5/23 was completely re- ports in North America and now serves ment to the aviation and non-aviation habilitated in 2011 under an FAA grant. more than eight million passengers an- community, Chris Rozansky’s many The City of Naples Airport Author- nually. The airport generates more than accomplishments have bridged the gap ity provides the venue for community $2 billion per year and has more than 20 between the airport and residents of the events, such as Fourth of July celebra- airline partners with nonstop service to city of Venice. His many accomplish- tions and the annual Run for the Paws to 47 destinations including four interna- ments, commitment to excellence, and benefit the Humane Society. tional destinations. The airport contin- relentless contribution of personal time On December 30, 2010, U.S. Cus- ues to grow in the international market, and energy to improving the conditions toms and Border Protection began pro- serving European destinations and ex- at Venice Municipal Airport are proof viding services from a new Customs tending commercial service throughout that he is truly an example of an extraor- facility, built and paid for by the airport South America. dinary aviation professional. authority as a service to airport ten- Safety and security are the priority. ants and the public. During its first nine General Aviation Airport The airport continues to upgrade equip- months of operation, 310 aircraft, many ment with the latest available technology Naples Municipal Airport of them based at the airport, cleared to include thermal imaging cameras to Naples Municipal Airport contin- Customs through the new facility. Traf- help prevent and detect intruders along ues to provide the local community and fic during the first seven months of 2012 the perimeter fence. state with an airport that is economically has already surpassed the prior year. The airport also continues to main- self-sufficient while remaining focused We congratulate the City of Naples tain the beautiful surroundings that their on improving safety and security with Airport Authority; Ted Soliday, Execu- customers have come to appreciate. an emphasis on maintaining the aesthet- tive Director, City of Naples Airport We congratulate Bob Ball, A.A.E., ics and acoustics that are important to Authority; and the staff of Naples Mu- Executive Director, Lee County Port the local residents. The airport manager nicipal Airport. and staff relentlessly seek opportunities See 2012 Florida, page 4 FLORIDA FLYER 2 Fall 2012 The Process of Preparing Airport Master Plans by Abdul Hatim, Ph.D. n Airport Master Plan is a pro- When this occurs, the owner/sponsor The airport master planning pro- Ajection of an airport’s conceptual should refer to the guidebook to develop cess begins when an airport sponsor re- long-term facility development. a comprehensive planning program that quests assistance from FDOT to initiate This plan is documented and ap- can best meet the needs of the airport a master planning project. The planning proved by the local governmental agen- and will result in a useful and cost- request is subsequently entered into the cy or authority, which owns and/or op- effective product. While both planning work program through the JACIP pro- erates the airport. A master plan reports report elements and drawing require- cess. In the fiscal year prior to the mas- the data and the logic upon which the ments are defined in the guidebook, air- ter plan project commencing, a project plan is based in a narrative format, and port facilities serving different roles and justification and scoping meeting with displays the ultimate development con- accommodating different levels of activ- the Orlando Federal Aviation Admin- cepts graphically in an Airport Layout ity will not necessarily require the same istration (FAA) Airports District Office Plan (ALP) set of drawings. planning products or level of investiga- (ADO) (if applicable) and the airport Airport Master Plans are regularly tion. Therefore, the guidebook has been sponsor should be held with the FDOT updated to support maintenance, devel- categorized for various airport facilities District Aviation Office to establish a opment, expansion, and modernization based on service characteristics. It also preliminary scope of work and to devel- of existing airports, as well as to justify suggests appropriate planning products, op a cost estimate for the project. At this construction of additional airports need- although it is understood that each plan- meeting, the airport sponsor should also ed to accommodate growth in demand ning effort is a unique endeavor and be prepared to provide a well-organized for aviation services on a local, regional, should reflect each airport’s specific rationale to support the planning effort and national basis. goals, objectives, and special issues. that includes the goals of the effort and The guidebook should be looked at the issues that the study will be designed FDOT Guidebook for Airport as a menu of planning tasks and prod- to resolve. Master Planning ucts, which can be individually selected Upon the issuance of a plan- The FDOT Guidebook for Airport to meet comprehensive airport planning ning grant and/or a Joint Participation Master Planning is available in the fol- needs and requirements. It has been de- Agreement (JPA) that reflects the costs lowing website: http://www.florida-avia- signed to help the user understand the established in the prior scope meeting, tion-database.com/dotsite/Publications/ planning process better, the role of key the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Venice Airport.”
    3/1/2021 Venice Aviation Society, Inc. (VASI) Venice Municipal Airport Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) History & General Information The City of Venice owns and operates the Venice Municipal Airport (KVNC) located several miles south of Venice’s central business district. Venice Municipal Airport is a General Aviation, Federally Obligated Airport, and a part of the National Aviation System. The airport began operations as an Army Air Force Base in World War II. The City acquired the airport through federal deeds of land transfer following the war. Starting in 1947, the War Assets Administrator (later the General Services Administration) deeded the City the basic airport land pursuant to the Surplus Property Act of 1944. A Federally Obligated Airport, such as Venice, is one that has incurred certain responsibilities, requirements, limitations and restrictions by accepting Federal assistance in either the form of grants or conveyance of Federal property for airport purposes. These deeds of transfer or conveyance imposed these restrictions, limitations and requirements on the City in assuming title to the Airport. These deed restrictions go with the land in perpetuity. General Aviation is non-airline aviation that includes among other segments, business/corporate aircraft, personally owned aircraft, and aviation businesses such as charter, sightseeing, aircraft rental or flight training. The airport serves the general aviation needs of the local area by providing business-related flying, and police, fire and rescue services, humanitarian aid, recreational flying, flight training, medical evacuation, charity flights (such as Angel Flight), U.S. Coast Guard; and other aviation-related activities. Approximately twelve businesses currently operate from the Venice Municipal Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports
    Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a of National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), Report to Congress, 2009-2013
    Colorado Hub Role Year 5 2009-2013 City Airport LocID Type Current Year 5 Enplaned Bsd Aft Dev Cost Akron Colorado Plains Regional AKO GA GA 0 14 $4,210,526 San Luis Valley Regional/ Alamosa ALS CS CS 5,902 64 $2,326,023 Bergman Field Aspen Aspen-Pitkin County/Sardy Field ASE N P P 187,615 93 $20,914,737 Boulder Boulder Municipal BDU GA GA 0 260 $3,657,896 Buena Vista Central Colorado Regional AEJ GA GA 0 35 $4,005,848 Burlington Kit Carson County ITR GA GA 0 23 $3,736,843 Canon City Fremont County 1V6 GA GA 0 97 $21,316,008 City of Colorado Springs Colorado Springs COS S P P 1,038,655 318 $207,232,169 Municipal Colorado Springs Meadow Lake 00V R R 0 455 $7,377,895 Cortez Cortez Municipal CEZ CS CS 9,355 31 $3,289,473 Craig Craig-Moffat CAG GA GA 0 16 $5,695,906 Delta Blake Field AJZ GA GA 0 34 $2,631,579 Denver Centennial APA R R 0 716 $32,657,896 Denver Denver International DEN L P P 26,141,804 1 $2,350,796,420 Denver Front Range FTG R R 0 418 $40,655,998 Denver Rocky Mountain Metropolitan BJC R R 26 352 $6,865,790 Durango Durango-La Plata County DRO N P P 126,654 76 $13,185,965 Eagle Eagle County Regional EGE N P P 236,960 130 $19,018,182 Erie Erie Municipal EIK GA GA 0 227 $2,701,754 Fort Collins/ Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal FNL N P P 38,796 255 $21,525,148 Loveland Fort Morgan Fort Morgan Municipal FMM GA GA 0 24 $11,473,684 Granby Granby-Grand County GNB GA GA 0 12 $10,218,421 Grand Junction Grand Junction Regional GJT N P P 164,097 156 $24,931,856 Greeley Greeley-Weld County GXY GA GA 0 234 $4,421,052 Gunnison-Crested Butte
    [Show full text]
  • FBO Survey 2008 (PDF)
    The 21st Annual COVERING NORTH, SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA PLUS U.S. TERRITORIES AND THE CARIBBEAN R I A to the Aviation International News 2008 FBO T S U R Welcome Survey, covering FBOs in the Americas (North, T N O C L Central and South America and the Caribbean). The U.S. FBOs included A F F O in this removable insert qualified for listing by receiving at least 40 Y S E T evaluations by AIN readers; non-U.S. FBOs listed must have received R U O C at least 25 evaluations. A total of 234 FBOs are included in this insert, O T O H P and FBOs that received overall ratings of 8.0 or higher are identified with a yellow highlight. The AIN FBO Survey was designed and administered by Forecast International of Newtown, Conn., in collaboration with AIN. The Top five FBOs 3. Airflite, Long Beach 2. Pentastar Aviation Million Air Pontiac 4. FalconTrust, Miami 1. Wilson Air Center, Memphis 5. City of Sugar Land Line Pax Pilot Overall Yellow shaded area indicates FBOs with overall average ratings of 8.0 or higher. service amenities amenities Facilities Average Alabama Atlantic 7.22 6.50 6.78 6.63 6.78 Birmingham Birmingham International (BHM) JetSouth 7.50 6.95 7.07 6.87 7.10 Alaska Million Air 8.50 7.9 0 8.27 8.33 8.25 Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International (ANC) Signature Flight Support 8.46 7.74 8.02 7.85 8.02 Arizona Cutter Aviation 7.89 7.76 7.80 7.97 7.86 Phoenix Sky Harbor International (PHX) Swift Aviation Services 8.14 8.45 8.31 8.80 8.42 Landmark Aviation 8.19 7.89 8.15 8.05 8.07 Scottsdale Scottsdale Municipal (SDL) Scottsdale Air Center
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA PA - FIPS ID List - FL
    FEMA PA - FIPS ID List - FL County Applicant ID Applicant Name City Zip Code Address Line 1 15100 Northwest 142 Alachua 001-00375-00 ALACHUA Terrace Alachua 32615-0000 15001 NW 140TH Alachua 001-00375-00 ALACHUA, CITY OF STREET ALACHUA 32615-0000 15001 NW 140TH Alachua 001-00375-00 ALACHUA, CITY OF STREET ALACUA 32615-0000 Alachua 001-01775-00 ARCHER 401 W. Main Street Archer 32618-0000 Alachua 001-01775-00 ARCHER, CITY OF 401 W. MAIN STREET ARCHER 32618-0000 ALACHUA COUNTY Alachua 001-043F4-00 PROPERTY APPRSR 12 SE 1ST ST Gainesville 32601-0000 SHANDS REHABILITATION Alachua 001-0BD35-00 SVC 1600 SW Archer Road Gainesville 32610-0000 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN Alachua 001-12E9B-00 CHURCH TBD TBD 32615-0000 ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF 2621 SE HAWTHORNE Alachua 001-131D3-00 OFC RD Gainesville 32641-0000 ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF 2621 SE Hawthorne Alachua 001-131D3-00 OFC Road Gainesville 32641-0000 ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF 2621 SE Hawthorne Gainesville, Alachua 001-131D3-00 OFC Road Florida 32641-0000 ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF 2621 SE Hawthorne Alachua 001-131D3-00 OFC Road Gainsville 32641-0000 SANTA FE COMMUNITY 3000 Northwest 83rd Alachua 001-16DB5-00 COLLEGE street, F26 Gainesville 32606-6210 SANTA FE COMMUNITY Alachua 001-16DB5-00 COLLEGE 3000 NW 83RD ST Gainesville 32606-0000 200 East University Alachua 001-25175-00 GAINESVILLE Avenue Gainesville 32601-0000 200 EAST Alachua 001-25175-00 GAINESVILLE, CITY OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE GAINESVILLE 32602-0000 GAINESVILLE-ALACHUA COUNTY REGIONAL 3880 NE 39TH AVE., Alachua 001-25237-00 AIRPORT AUTHORITY SUITE A GAINESVILLE 32609-0000 GAINESVILLE REGIONAL Alachua 001-25237-00 AIRPORT 3880 NE 39th Ave Gainesville 32609-0000 HAWTHORN (CORPORATE Alachua 001-29250-00 NAME HAWTHORNE) 6700 S.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update
    FLORIDA Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update TECHNICAL REPORT AUGUST 2014 FLORIDA STATEWIDE AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY UPDATE August 2014 Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceports Office This report was prepared as an effort of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Planning Process under the sponsorship of the Florida Department of Transportation. A full technical report containing information on data collection, methodologies, and approaches for estimating statewide and airport specific economic impacts is available at www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation/economicimpact.shtm. More information on the Florida’s Aviation Economic Impact Study can be obtained from the Aviation and Spaceports Office by calling 850-414-4500. Florida Department of Transportation – Aviation & Spaceports Office Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update August 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1-1 OVERVIEW OF AVIATION’S ECONOMIC IMPACT IN FLORIDA ............................................1-1 TYPES OF AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT MEASURED ......................................................1-2 APPROACH TO MEASURING AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT IN FLORIDA ........................1-2 AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACTS ............................................................................................1-2 VISITOR ECONOMIC IMPACTS .............................................................................................1-3
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Regulations
    Rules and Regulations City of Naples Airport Authority 160 Aviation Drive North Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 643-0733 December 17, 2018 Revisions Revision Type Date Revised Revision Title and/or Remarks Original Document July 1, 1976 New release Operational Rule May 15, 1996 Maintenance run-up restriction Operational Rule April 18, 1997 75,000 pound weight limit Operational Rule June 1, 1997 T-hangar access Operational Rule March 3, 1999 Stage 1 Jet ban Amendment January 1, 2001 Stage 2 Jet ban Total Revision May 16, 2013 New release Logo Update December 17, 2018 New logo Table of Contents Section 1 – General ......................................................................................................................... 1 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 B. Statement of Policy ....................................................................................................... 1 C. Severability Clause ....................................................................................................... 1 D. Variance ........................................................................................................................ 1 E. Definitions..................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2 – Use of Airport .............................................................................................................. 4 A. General .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE AVIATION Economic Impact Study 3 2 5 7 1 4 6 Technical Report 2019 Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Communicating Results ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Florida’s Airports ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Study Conventions ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.1 Study Terminology .............................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 12 2. Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 FDOT District Results ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Card Accepting Merchants
    Thank you for your patience as we launch the RESQ Card Program. We will continue to grow the merchant network to support the RESQ Card for your convenience. It is our pleasure to be of service to the men and women that work to support our communities. Contact us at [email protected] if you have any questions or if you need additional cards. Please visit KHInc.com for the most current list of accepting merchants. Merchant Name ICAO City State Million Air ‐ Calgary CYYC Calgary AB Alaska AeroFuel, Inc. PAFA Fairbanks AK Gustavus Dray, Inc. PAGS Gustavus AK Atlantic Aviation PAJN Juneau AK Aero Services, Inc. KTN PAKT Ketchikan AK Ross Aviation PANC Anchorage AK Colville, Inc. PASC Prudhoe Bay AK Aero Services, Inc. SIT PASI Sitka AK Signature Flight Support ‐ BFM KBFM Mobile AL Atlantic Aviation KBHM Birmingham AL Aero One Aviation LLC KDHN Dothan AL Bessemer Municipal Airport KEKY Bessemer AL Signature Flight Support ‐ HSV KHSV Huntsville AL Sanders Aviation Inc KJFX Jasper AL Montgomery Aviation Corporation KMGM Montgomery AL Signature Flight Support‐MOB KMOB Mobile AL Dixie Air Services Inc KTCL Tuscaloosa AL Signature Flight Support ‐ ANC PANC Anchorage AL Magnolia Municipal Airport KAGO Magnolia AR Big Air KBPK Midway AR South Arkansas Regional Airport KELD El Dorado AR City of Fayetteville KFYV Fayetteville AR City of Fayetteville KFYV Fayetteville AR City of Hot Springs KHOT Hot Springs AR Tucson Aeroservice Center, Inc. KAVQ Marana AZ “Never leave a warfighter or first responder stranded” 1.877.681.5151 [email protected] Southwestern
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Zoning 10/22/2019 CCPC 8/7/2019 DSAC 4/3/2019 DSAC-LDR 10/16/2018 & 12/18/2018
    LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT PETITION SUMMARY PL20180001993 This amendment proposes a new review process for airspace obstructions within Collier County and proposes new compatibility regulations based on ORIGIN the requirements within Chapter 333, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Growth Management Department LDC SECTIONS TO BE AMENDED 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts HEARING DATES 4.02.06 Standards for Development in Airport Zones BCC 10/8/2019 & Appendix D Airport Zoning 10/22/2019 CCPC 8/7/2019 DSAC 4/3/2019 DSAC-LDR 10/16/2018 & 12/18/2018 ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS DSAC-LDR DSAC CCPC Approval Approval Approval BACKGROUND In 2016, the provisions within Chapter 333, F.S., were modified with the passing of HB 7061. The changes to Chapter 333, F.S., include: modifications and additions to the existing defined terms; updates to the standards for airport land use compatibility zoning regulations; updates to the appeals and judicial review processes; updates to the criteria for Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) evaluation of airport protection zoning permit applications; and updates to the criteria and processes for political subdivisions’ airport protection zoning regulations. Section 333.03, F.S. states that political subdivisions having airport protection zoning regulations must, at a minimum, require: • A permit for the construction or alteration of any obstruction; • Obstruction marking and lighting for obstructions; • Documentation showing compliance with the federal requirement for notification of proposed construction or alteration of structures and a valid aeronautical study submitted by each person applying for a permit; • Consideration of the criteria in section 333.025(6), F.S., when determining whether to issue or deny a permit; and • That the approval of a permit not be based solely on the determination by the Federal Aviation Administration that the proposed structure is not an airport hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • LEED for New Construction by Certification Date # Project Name City Version Level Date 1 Eugene M
    LEED for New Construction by certification date # Project Name City Version Level Date 1 Eugene M. & Christine Lynn Business Cent DeLand v2.0 Certified 3/31/2003 2 Rinker Hall Gainesville v2.0 Gold 5/7/2004 3 Navy Federal Credit Union Remote Call Ce Pensacola v2.1 Gold 7/29/2004 4 Happy Feet Plus, Inc. Clearwater v2.0 Gold 10/15/2004 5 North Sarasota Public Library Sarasota v2.0 Gold 6/28/2005 6 McGuire Center for Lepidoptera Research Gainesville v2.1 Certified 7/1/2005 7 Whole Foods Market - Sarasota Sarasota v2.1 Silver 9/9/2005 8 Twin Lakes Park Office Complex Sarasota v2.0 Gold 9/23/2005 9 Deer Park Water Bottling Plant Lee v2.1 Silver 6/23/2006 10 Powell Structures Lab Gainesville v2.1 Certified 10/1/2006 11 Mary Ann Coffrin-Harn Pavilion Gainesville v2.1 Certified 10/20/2006 12 University of Florida Orthopaedic Surger Gainesville v2.1 Certified 11/28/2006 13 Girl Scouts HQ & Program Training Center Sarasota v2.1 Certified 12/4/2006 14 PHH BUILDING JACKSONVILLE v2.1 Certified 12/14/2006 15 UNF Social Sciences Building Jacksonville v2.1 Certified 1/27/2007 16 Veterinary Medicine Food Animal Facility GAINESVILLE v2.1 Certified 6/4/2007 17 Library West Additions & Renovations Gainesville v2.1 Gold 7/2/2007 18 UF-136 Genetics & Cancer Research Center Gainesville v2.1 Certified 7/19/2007 19 COMMISSARY WAREHOUSE DNPS KENNEDY SPACE CENTER v2.1 Silver 7/30/2007 20 New Community Center, City of Dunedin Dunedin v2.1 Silver 8/30/2007 21 Christine E.
    [Show full text]
  • Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update Airport Layout Plan Narrative Collier County Airport Authority
    Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update Airport Layout Plan Narrative Collier County Airport Authority August 14, 2017 Working Paper # 2 Immokalee Regional Airport, Airport Layout Plan Update Airport Layout Plan Narrative Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary 6 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Purpose, Goals & Objectives 7 1.2. Airport Organization 8 1.3. Review of Existing Studies 9 1.4. Key Planning Issues 12 2. Inventory of Existing Conditions 13 2.1. Airport Background 13 2.2. Airport Facility Inventory 16 2.3. Navigational Aids 22 2.4. Airspace Structure 28 2.5. Land Use and Zoning 33 2.6. Environmental Consideration 33 2.7. Existing Utilities and Infrastructure 41 3. Forecast of Aviation Demand 42 3.1. Introduction 42 3.2. Data Sources 42 3.3. Historical Aeronautical Activity and Based Aircraft 44 3.4. Based Aircraft Projections 45 3.5. Aviation Activity Projections 47 3.6. Peaking Characteristics 53 3.7. Summary 54 4. Design Criteria and Facility Requirements 55 4.1. Introduction 55 4.2. Demand and Capacity 55 4.3. Critical Aircraft 60 4.4. Airside Facility Requirements 60 4.5. Landside Facility Requirements 66 4.6. Support Facilities 69 5. Airport Development Plan 70 5.1. Airport Development Alternatives and Concepts 70 5.2. Future Airport Land Use Concept 77 5.3. Preferred Airport Development Concept 79 Appendices 81 Appendix A. Runway Length Analysis 82 A.1. Fleet Mix and Critical Aircraft 82 A.2. Runway Length 83 A.3. Aircraft Take-off Performance in Warm Climates 85 A.4. Runway Length Adjustments for Contaminated Surface 86 Appendix B.
    [Show full text]