DOCSLIB.ORG

PR21-307-Mcmillan-Ex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PR21-307-Mcmillan-Ex COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 DRAFT TO: All Councilmembers FROM: Chairman Phil Mendelson Committee of the Whole DATE: November 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Report on PR 21-307, “McMillan Townhomes Parcel, Commercial Parcel, and Multifamily Parcels Disposition Extension Approval Resolution of 2015” The Committee of the Whole, to which PR 21-307, the “McMillan Townhomes Parcel, Commercial Parcel, and Multifamily Parcels Disposition Extension Approval Resolution of 2015” was referred, reports favorably thereon and recommends approval by the Council. CONTENTS I. Background And Need ...............................................................1 II. Legislative Chronology ..............................................................2 III. Position Of The Executive .........................................................3 IV. Comments Of Advisory Neighborhood Commissions ..............3 V. Summary Of Testimony .............................................................3 VI. Impact On Existing Law ............................................................9 VII. Fiscal Impact ..............................................................................9 VIII. Section-By-Section Analysis .....................................................9 IX. Committee Action ......................................................................9 X. Attachments ...............................................................................9 I. BACKGROUND AND NEED On September 16, 2015, PR 21-307, the “McMillan Townhomes Parcel, Commercial Parcel, and Multifamily Parcels Disposition Extension Approval Resolution of 2015” was introduced by Chairman Mendelson at the request of the Mayor. PR 21-307 would extend the time the Mayor has to dispose of the McMillan property. The Development Project The McMillan Reservoir Slow Sand Filtration Site (“McMillan Site”) was conveyed to the District by the federal government in 1987. Prior to that, the site had been operational as a slow- sand water filtration system for 70 years. The property features two paved service courts that divide the site into three large, grassy open spaces. These open spaces are the roofs of 20 unreinforced concrete filter beds that were covered by a layer of fill. In 2014, the Council approved three resolutions authorizing the Mayor to dispose of the property to Vision McMillan Partners Committee of the Whole Nov. 3, 2015 Report on PR 21-307 Page 2 of 10 (“VMP”) to redevelop the property into a combination of healthcare facilities, apartment buildings, townhouses, a recreational center, and open green space.1 VMP is a partnership between three development companies: Trammel Crow Company, EYA, and Jair Lynch Development Partners. Trammel Crow will construct over one million square feet of healthcare facilities; EYA will construct 146 townhouses; Jair Lynch will construct 531 apartment units in two buildings; and the District will be responsible for infrastructure, eight acres of park space, a 17,000 square foot recreational facility, and the preservation of a portion of the McMillan Site’s historical features. The Project Timeline The Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (“DMPED”) and VMP have established a development construction timeline that exceeds the Mayor’s current disposition authority (expiring December 2, 2016) by five years. IDMPED and VMP have successfully completed the entitlements process and in 2016 will seek a subdivision of the site into multiple parcels and apply for construction permits. The schedule will continue afterward as follows:2 Q3 2016: Commence Site Work (selective demolition, site work, infrastructure) Q1 2018: Sale of Phase 1 finished pads Q3 2018: First model townhome complete and townhome sales commence Q4 2019: Completion of Phase 1 multi-family building Q4 2020: Full lease up of Phase 1 multifamily building (15 units per month) Q1 2021: Sale of Phase 2 multifamily and healthcare finished pads Q2 2021: 45% Contracts on Phase 1 townhomes (1 townhouse contract per month) Q3 2021: Sale of Phase 2 townhouse finished pads According to the summary term sheets for the project, the outside date for the Phase 2 closings is up to four years after the Phase 1 closings, or the expiration of the extension resolution, whichever is sooner. The development team and DMPED have testified that they are comfortable with the extension resolution expiring in December 2021. Therefore, the Committee recommends approval of PR 21-307. II. LEGISLATIVE CHRONOLOGY Sept. 16, 2015 PR 21-307, the “McMillan Townhomes Parcel, Commercial Parcel, and Multifamily Parcels Disposition Extension Approval Resolution of 2015” is introduced by Chairman Mendelson at the request of the Mayor. Sept. 22, 2015 PR 21-307 is “read” at a legislative meeting; on this date the referral of the bill to the Committee of the Whole is official. 1 See The McMillan Residential Townhomes Parcel Disposition Approval Resolution of 2014 (Res. 20-0705; 62 DCR 1091), the McMillan Residential Multifamily Parcels Disposition Approval Resolution of 2009 (Res. 20-0706; 62 DCR 1094), and the McMillan Commercial Parcel Disposition Approval Resolution of 2014 (Res. 20-0707; 62 DCR 1097). 2 Timeline provided in the testimony of Gilles Stucker, Senior Project Manager at DMPED, at the public hearing before the Committee of the Whole on PR 21-307 on October 26, 2015. Committee of the Whole Nov. 3, 2015 Report on PR 21-307 Page 3 of 10 Sept. 25, 2015 Notice of Intent to Act on PR 21-307 is published in the District of Columbia Register. Oct. 2, 2015 Notice of a Public Hearing on PR 21-307 is published in the District of Columbia Register. Oct. 26, 2015 The Committee of the Whole holds a public hearing on PR 21-307. Nov. 3, 2015 The Committee of the Whole marks-up PR 21-307. III. POSITION OF THE EXECUTIVE Gilles Stucker, Senior Project Manager for the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development, testified at the Committee’s public hearing on October 26, 2015. Mr. Gilles began his testimony by outlining the aspects of the development plan and the expected revenue. Next, he provided a timeline for the schedule of construction, which is expected to go into 2021. IV. COMMENTS OF ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSIONS The Committee did not receive any formal resolutions from any ANC, however two Commissioners representing ANC1A10 and ANC5E09 testified at the public hearing on PR 21- 307 in favor of the legislation and the underlying development project. V. SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY The Committee of the Whole held a public hearing on PR 21-307 on Monday, October 26, 2015. The testimony summarized below is from that hearing. Copies of written testimony are attached to this report. Adam Weers, VMP/Trammel Crow Companies, testified on behalf of the developer for the healthcare and retail components of the project. He stated that Parcel 1 of the project will be dedicated to healthcare office and research facilities which will require 27 months of construction. He also described the company’s initiative known as Opportunity|McMillan, in partnership with the Community Foundation, which includes a $1 million investment in scholarships and workforce development in preparation for 6,000 jobs to be created from this project. Brian Allan Jackson, VMP, EYA Development, testified on behalf of EYA Development, a partner of Vision McMillan Partners. He stated that if the extension is approved, the company will work with DMPED to submit site development permits at the beginning of 2016 and begin land development in the summer of 2016. Committee of the Whole Nov. 3, 2015 Report on PR 21-307 Page 4 of 10 Jair Lynch, VMP/Jair Lynch Development Partners, testified in favor of the legislation as one of the partner developers comprising Vision McMillan Partners. Jair Lynch Development Partners is responsible for the construction of Parcel 4, which will contain 196 market rate rental apartments, 85 affordable senior apartments, and 53,000 square feet of grocery store retail space, and Parcel 2, which will contain 236 rental apartments (including 25 affordable units). Parcel 4 and Parcel 2 will be constructed in two phases. Philip J. Blair, Jr., Public Witness, testified in opposition to the McMillan extension. He expressed concerns related to a recent letter from the D.C. Auditor regarding a lack of competitive bidding in the city’s selection of VMP as master developer. He also called on Councilmember Nadeau to recuse herself from voting on McMillan related legislation due to an allegation that her chief of staff worked for VMP while managing Ms. Nadeau’s campaign. Mary Pat Rowan, Public Witness, testified in opposition to the McMillan development project extension. She cited a lack of park space in Ward 5, as well as concern that many religious institutions in the area are slowly selling off their land to private developers. Andrea Rosen, Public Witness, testified in opposition to the McMillan development project. She does not believe that agencies including DMPED have ensured a competitive bidding process in for the McMillan project, and that VMP was unfairly granted additional time and city funds. In her written submission, she attached a copy of a letter from Kathleen Patterson, District of Columbia Auditor, to Chairman Phil Mendelson in which Ms. Patterson expressed concern that after the District took full responsibility of the project, VMP was given “exclusive rights” to negotiate on cost and other factors. Quoting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • He L'enfant Plan of 1791
    >ince its inception as a formal park, the National The Residence Act of 1790 authorized the president 11all has evolved and expanded along with the to choose the location for the new city. President 1atlon that created it. The story of the .Mall Is the . George Washington chose as the city's site the land .tory of the building of a new Federal City to serve in Maryland and Virginia where the Eastern Branch !S capital of the United States. From marshes and (Anacostia River), Rock Creek, and Tiber Creek fed neadows to one of the most famous and historic into the Potomac River. The Act also designated 3ndscapes in the world, the National Mall serves as three commissioners to have immediate authority his nation's front lawn. over purchasing and accepting • ...such quantity of land for use of the United States.• Most of the land -radition has it that the plain at the foot of present· acquired by the commissioners, Including the Carroll iay Capitol Hill, drained by the Tiber Creek, was the and Burnes properties, became this nation's first 1unting and fishing grounds of Native Americans. federal public parks. President Washington hired the Vith seventeenth century British colonization, most mifitary engineer Major Pierre Charles L'Enfant to if this land eventually came into the ownership of design the Federal City. It was L'Enfant's intention he Carroll and Burnes families. • ...to turn a savage wilderness into a Garden of Eden.• he L'Enfant Plan of 1791 .'Enfant envisioned a city of parks. The Mall, or Personality clashes with tha three commissioners ·c;;rand Avenue," was to be the central landscaoe of led to L'Enfant's dismissal in 1792.
    [Show full text]
  • Similarities Between L'enfant's Urban Plan for Washington, DC, and The
    Case Study Similarities between L’Enfant’s Urban Plan for Washington, DC, and the Royal Site of Aranjuez, Spain C. San-Antonio-G´omez1; C. Velilla2; and F. Manzano-Agugliaro3 Abstract: The influence of Versailles on L’Enfant’s 1791 plan for the city of Washington, DC, is well known. Less well known are the surprising similarities between Washington and the forma urbis of the Royal Site of Aranjuez in Spain. For example, the cities share the same diagram of two large, rectangular spaces arranged in an L shape, at the extremes of which are located, analogously, the most emblematic buildings: The Capitol and the White House in one instance, and the Royal Palace and the Church of San Antonio in the other. There are also connections between some of the diagonal avenues; between the Plaza de las Doce Calles in Aranjuez and the 12 avenues radiating from the Capitol; and between the trident of Parterre Garden in Aranjuez and the trident formed in L’Enfant’s plan by Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Maryland Avenue SW, and Avenue H. Based on these facts, this paper investigates parallels that have hitherto been ignored. It is not possible to conclude, based on the currently available information, that L’Enfant was familiar with the plan for Aranjuez, which was sent in 1775 to the main European courts, where it is conserved in their libraries. A copy of the plan is also the Library of Congress in Washington, DC. There is evidence that L’Enfant’s father, and possibly he himself, saw it in Paris at the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture, at which L’Enfant was studying before his departure for the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 DC HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Plan Methodology Connections to Long-Range Planning B Seeking Public Views
    2020 District of Columbia Historic Preservation Plan Preserving For Progress 1 introduction 1 Preserving for progress The district of columbia’s vision for historic preservation 2 dc history and heritage 9 People and progress A legacy of visionary plans Landmarks and milestones A succession of eras 3 preservation achievements 45 What works about preservation in dc 4 preservation challenges 55 Gathering public views Balancing growth and character Protecting neighborhoods Communicating preservation basics Leading the nation Planning for preservation Evaluating available resources 5 goals, objectives, and actions 65 Setting shared goals Sustaining our progress Preservation in context A new planning cycle Recognizing historic resources Engaging communities Improving protections Maintaining our heritage 6 implementation 79 Achieving our goals 7 resources and appendices 89 Bibliography Credits and acknowledgements introduction 1 Preserving for progress Introduction Continuing on a Path Forward A Guide for Everyone Plan Organization Now well into its third century, the District of Columbia is This plan for 2020 updates the goals established in the Preservation requires collective action. Community The 2020 plan is organized in seven chapters: fortunate in the exceptional value of its cultural, historical, District’s historic preservation plan for the four years ending organizations and volunteers foster pride in our history and and architectural heritage. This is a rich and varied legacy, in 2016. That plan introduced a new framework for planning advocate for the benefits of preservation. Schools, cultural • First, it describes a common vision, and reviews our manifested not just in the city’s majestic museums and that could be sustained through regular updates in the institutions, and a multitude of congregations maintain history and heritage — Chapters 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • AIA 1900 • 2012 the Mall in 1892 Cluttered with Buildings, Trees, and the Mall in 2006
    2. Enter Architect Glenn Brown One person had studied the Mall for several years and had a clear picture of how the Mall could be restored. Architect Glenn Brown, secretary of the Washington chapter of AIA, realized that the answer was to return to the elements of the original 1791 L’Enfant Plan. Brown lobbied for the 1900 convention to be held in Washington where visitors could see, in person, the overgrown and chaotic condition of the Mall. He organized a series of presentations by architects to open discussion of a variety of ideas. Brown led the way and brought the architectural profession with him. Glenn Brown prepared a new curvilinear plan. Cass Gilbert proposed (top) moving the White House further north on 16th Street. Paper Relating to the Improvement of the City of Washington, Senate Document 94, 56th Congress, 2nd Session, 1901. Planning for the 3rd Century 6. White House Today there is a need for a new Visionary Plan for the Mall Future 17th St. in its 3rd Century – and a new McMillan Commission to levee Lincoln Washington create that Plan. This Plan will rise above the fragmented, Memorial Monument jurisdiction-based current plans and ad-hoc development A new plan can complete the unfinished Washington MonumentFlood Plain Map for western grounds portions of and the National resolve Mall. flooding Dark grey areas threats. are special flood hazard areas subject to with a comprehensive plan for the entire Mall as a unified inundation by the 1% annual chance flood (100-­‐year flood plain). Light grey are other flood areas.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON, D. C.: Essays on the City Form of a Capital
    WASHINGTON, D. C.: Essays on the City Form of a Capital by George Kousoulas Bachelor of Architecture University of Miami Coral Gables, Florida 1982 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 1985 @ George Kousoulas 1985 The Author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly copies of this thesis document in whole or in part Signature of the autho . eorgeG osua rtment of Architecture May 10, 1985 Certified by Julian Beinart Professor of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by I I ~ I ~ D..~i- \j WWJuChairmanlia ear Departmental Committee for Graduate Students JUN 0 31985 1 otCtj 2 WASHINGTON, D.C.: Essays on the City Form of a Capital by George Kousoulas Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 10, 1985 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies ABSTRACT This thesis is an exploration of the city form of Washington, D.C. through four independent essays. Each essay examines a different aspect of the city: its monumentality as determined by its relationship with the nation it governs, the linear network of its plan, the 'objectness' of its principal buildings, and finally, the signifigance of nature. Their structure and the manner in which they view the city are tailored to their respective topics. Together they represent a body of work whose intent is to explore those issues which distinguish Washington. The premise for this approach is a belief that cities should be understood for what they are, not only for what they are like or what they are not.
    [Show full text]
  • 22753 Ncsom OUT
    www.nationalmallcoalition.org Through Public Policy and Innovative Ideas Innovative and Policy Public Through Advancing the Legacy of the National Mall National the of Legacy the Advancing National Mall Coalition Mall National When You Set Foot On The National Mall, The Founding Fathers Speak To You. 1 - Suffragists Parade on Pennsylvania Avenue, 1913 PHOTO CREDITS – Front Cover: Celebrating July 4th On The Mall, c. 1 990, by Tom Wachs – Back Cover: Aerial View Of The National Mall, by Car ol 2 - Children with sailboats at the Reflecting Pool, 1920s Highsmith – 1, 3, 5, 7: Library of Congress, Prints & Photogr aphs Division – 3 - Bonus veterans at the U.S. Capitol, Bonus March 1932 2: National Photo Company Collection, Libr ary of Congress – 4: National 4 - Marian Anderson on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, Easter Sunday, 1939 Archives, Still Pictures Division, Photo T ime-Life – 6: AP/Wide W orld Photos – Map Side: Tom Wachs and Car ol Highsmith. 5 - Reflecting Pool with Navy temporary buildings, 1945 6 - Martin Luther King Jr. on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, 1963 7 When you set foot on the 4 7 - Inauguration of Ronald Reagan on the west front of the U.S. Capitol, January 20, 1981 National Mall, the Founding 6 recent is the new National Fathers speak to you. From Museum of African their marble monuments, and 1 American History and Culture. Historical Guide Historical across the centuries, they tell of the ideals that gave birth The moratorium is a promise that will & MAP to our government “of the be very difficult to keep.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism in Bartholomew County, Indiana, from 1942
    NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 MODERNISM IN BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY, INDIANA, FROM 1942 Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form E. STATEMENT OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS INTRODUCTION This National Historic Landmark Theme Study, entitled “Modernism in Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Design and Art in Bartholomew County, Indiana from 1942,” is a revision of an earlier study, “Modernism in Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Design and Art in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 1942-1999.” The initial documentation was completed in 1999 and endorsed by the Landmarks Committee at its April 2000 meeting. It led to the designation of six Bartholomew County buildings as National Historic Landmarks in 2000 and 2001 First Christian Church (Eliel Saarinen, 1942; NHL, 2001), the Irwin Union Bank and Trust (Eero Saarinen, 1954; NHL, 2000), the Miller House (Eero Saarinen, 1955; NHL, 2000), the Mabel McDowell School (John Carl Warnecke, 1960; NHL, 2001), North Christian Church (Eero Saarinen, 1964; NHL, 2000) and First Baptist Church (Harry Weese, 1965; NHL, 2000). No fewer than ninety-five other built works of architecture or landscape architecture by major American architects in Columbus and greater Bartholomew County were included in the study, plus many renovations and an extensive number of unbuilt projects. In 2007, a request to lengthen the period of significance for the theme study as it specifically relates to the registration requirements for properties, from 1965 to 1973, was accepted by the NHL program and the original study was revised to define a more natural cut-off date with regard to both Modern design trends and the pace of Bartholomew County’s cycles of new construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch1 4.Pdf (2.873Mb)
    Chapter 1 Introduction: A Site, Questions… Ruins provide the incentive for restoration…There has to be an interim… of death or rejection before there can be renewal and reform. The old order has to die before there can be a born-again landscape. John Brinckerhoff Jackson (Jackson 1980,102) In the summer 2001, while exploring thesis possibilities, the author made two impor- tant discoveries. The first related to the Society for Industrial Archeology (SIA). Although founded in Washington, DC, in 1971, it took 30 years before the Society returned to hold an annual conference in the nation’s capital. At the time, the Society recognized that few considered Washington a prime candidate for the exploration of industrial heritage. Yet while Washington’s heritage never duplicated that of cities such as Pittsburgh and Buffalo, the capital had evolved its own industrial heritage, one notable example of which was the Washington Aqueduct and its McMillan Reservoir Sand Filtration Plant, the largest slow sand filtration system built in the United States (SIA 2001). A second discovery came from an old issue of Landscape Architecture magazine. In late 1992, the magazine conducted a small informal work- shop (LA Forum) to explore revival of the McMillan plant site that had been closed to the public since World War II and abandoned since the late 1980s. Workshop par- 1.2 Site from First Street ticipants visited not only a 25-acre industrial ruin but also the remnants of a park designed and installed atop it by Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. as an offshoot of the 1902 McMillan Plan for the capital’s park system.
    [Show full text]
  • Altered States: the American Psychedelic Aesthetic
    ALTERED STATES: THE AMERICAN PSYCHEDELIC AESTHETIC A Dissertation Presented by Lana Cook to The Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of English Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April, 2014 1 © Copyright by Lana Cook All Rights Reserved 2 ALTERED STATES: THE AMERICAN PSYCHEDELIC AESTHETIC by Lana Cook ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University, April, 2014 3 ABSTRACT This dissertation traces the development of the American psychedelic aesthetic alongside mid-twentieth century American aesthetic practices and postmodern philosophies. Psychedelic aesthetics are the varied creative practices used to represent altered states of consciousness and perception achieved via psychedelic drug use. Thematically, these works are concerned with transcendental states of subjectivity, psychic evolution of humankind, awakenings of global consciousness, and the perceptual and affective nature of reality in relation to social constructions of the self. Formally, these works strategically blend realist and fantastic languages, invent new language, experimental typography and visual form, disrupt Western narrative conventions of space, time, and causality, mix genres and combine disparate aesthetic and cultural traditions such as romanticism, surrealism, the medieval, magical realism, science fiction, documentary, and scientific reportage. This project attends to early exemplars of the psychedelic aesthetic, as in the case of Aldous Huxley’s early landmark text The Doors of Perception (1954), forgotten pioneers such as Jane Dunlap’s Exploring Inner Space (1961), Constance Newland’s My Self and I (1962), and Storm de Hirsch’s Peyote Queen (1965), cult classics such as Tom Wolfe’s The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test (1968), and ends with the psychedelic aesthetics’ popularization in films like Roger Corman’s The Trip (1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Inclusion
    2020-2021 COHORT DIRECTORY Pathways to Inclusion A message from ULI Washington: The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities. ULI Washington carries forth that mission by serving the Washington region, in both public and private sectors, with pragmatic land use expertise and education. ULI Washington has the second largest membership in the Urban Land Institute network with a little over 2500 members in the Washington region including the surrounding counties in Maryland and Virginia. Our members are involved in all aspects of the development and city planning process – private, public, and non-profit. We are excited to add the Pathways to Inclusion diversity initiative to our offerings. We deeply care about the future of ULI Washington and share a desire to see the district council and the industry strengthened by attracting more People of Color. This initiative is a first step in defining a vision for how to increase diversity. Over the next year, we will explore additional ways to provide opportunities for participation in ULI Washington by diverse real estate professionals, and opportunities to develop partnerships outside of ULI to assist with these goals. Koray Aysin Global Sustainability Specialist Perkins Eastman [email protected] Koray Aysin, born in Turkey, is a Sustainability Specialist at Perkins Eastman Architects where he oversees firmwide sustainability strategies and education initiatives. He has over eight years of multi- disciplinary experience in sustainable design, real estate development and urban planning & economic development. He is passionate about fostering affordable, inclusive and sustainable build environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Contracting Activity
    Vendor Name Address Vendor Contact Vendor Phone Email Address Total Amount 1213 U STREET LLC /T/A BEN'S 1213 U ST., NW WASHINGTON DC 20009 VIRGINIA ALI 202-667-909 $3,181.75 350 ROCKWOOD DRIVE SOUTHINGTON CT 13TH JUROR, LLC 6489 REGINALD F. ALLARD, JR. 860-621-1013 $7,675.00 1417 N STREET NWCOOPERATIVE 1417 N ST NW COOPERATIVE WASHINGTON DC 20005 SILVIA SALAZAR 202-412-3244 $156,751.68 1133 15TH STREET NW, 12TH FL12TH FLOOR 1776 CAMPUS, INC. WASHINGTON DC 20005 BRITTANY HEYD 703-597-5237 [email protected] $200,000.00 6230 3rd Street NWSuite 2 Washington DC 1919 Calvert Street LLC 20011 Cheryl Davis 202-722-7423 $1,740,577.50 4606 16TH STREET, NW WASHINGTON DC 19TH STREET BAPTIST CHRUCH 20011 ROBIN SMITH 202-829-2773 $3,200.00 2013 H ST NWSTE 300 WASHINGTON DC 2013 HOLDINGS, INC 20006 NANCY SOUTHERS 202-454-1220 $5,000.00 3900 MILITARY ROAD NW WASHINGTON DC 202 COMMUNICATIONS INC. 20015 MIKE HEFFNER 202-244-8700 [email protected] $31,169.00 1010 NW 52ND TERRACEPO BOX 8593 TOPEAK 20-20 CAPTIONING & REPORTING KS 66608 JEANETTE CHRISTIAN 785-286-2730 [email protected] $3,120.00 21C3 LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT LL 11 WATERFORD CIRCLE HAMPTON VA 23666 KIPP ROGERS 757-503-5559 [email protected] $9,500.00 1816 12TH STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 21ST CENTURY SCHOOL FUND 20009 MARY FILARDO 202-745-3745 [email protected] $303,200.00 1550 CATON CENTER DRIVE, 21ST CENTURY SECURITY, LLC #ADBA/PROSHRED SECURITY BALTIMORE MD C. MARTIN FISHER 410-242-9224 $14,326.25 22 Atlantic Street CoOp 22 Atlantic Street SE Washington DC 20032 LaVerne Grant 202-409-1813 $2,899,682.00 11701 BOWMAN GREEN DRIVE RESTON VA 2228 MLK LLC 20190 CHRIS GAELER 703-581-6109 $218,182.28 1651 Old Meadow RoadSuite 305 McLean VA 2321 4th Street LLC 22102 Jim Edmondson 703-893-303 $13,612,478.00 722 12TH STREET NWFLOOR 3 WASHINGTON 270 STRATEGIES INC DC 20005 LENORA HANKS 312-618-1614 [email protected] $60,000.00 2ND LOGIC, LLC 10405 OVERGATE PLACE POTOMAC MD 20854 REZA SAFAMEJAD 202-827-7420 [email protected] $58,500.00 3119 Martin Luther King Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • November 13, 2006 the Hon. Linda W. Cropp Chair District of Columbia City Council John A. Wilson Building 1350 Pennsylvania Aven
    November 13, 2006 The Hon. Linda W. Cropp Chair District of Columbia City Council John A. Wilson Building 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Dear Chair Cropp, On behalf of the National Association for Olmsted Parks (NAOP), I am writing to express our concern over the proposed transfer of the historic 25-acre McMillan Reservoir Sand Filtration Site to the National Capital Revitalization Corporation for commercial development. The creation of McMillan Park in 1905 represented significant 20 th century advancement in the implementation of the Senate Park Commission’s plan, also known as the McMillan Plan of 1901-1902. This effort revived L’Enfant’s concept of the National Mall, re-validated Olmsted Sr.’s design for the U.S. Capitol Grounds, and called for an “Emerald Necklace” of parks, open space and recreation facilities encircling the city. With commanding views of the U.S. Capitol and the Washington Monument, McMillan Park satisfied two critical needs: safe water and open space for passive and active recreation. The site combined a massive civic infrastructure project — the sand filtration complex — with a public park and by doing so distinguished the District of Columbia as a leader in the City Beautiful planning movement, which supported beautification and monumental grandeur in cities to create harmonious social conditions to improve the lives of the city’s poor. The site’s design and construction was the collaboration of pre-eminent 20 th century civil engineers, urban planners, artists and architects including Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. ― the principal planner and sole landscape architect of this unusual and unique site.
    [Show full text]