Wisconsin Briefs from the Legislative Reference Bureau

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wisconsin Briefs from the Legislative Reference Bureau Wisconsin Briefs from the Legislative Reference Bureau Brief 12−1 April 2012 INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM, AND RECALL IN WISCONSIN INTRODUCTION government bodies) may submit petitions This brief summarizes the laws relating to proposing legislation. the initiative, referendum, and recall in While Section 9.20, Wisconsin Statutes, is Wisconsin. titled “Direct legislation,” the initiative Unlike many states, Wisconsin does not process in Wisconsin cities and villages is have a statewide initiative process, but actually an indirect form. A direct initiative residents of cities and villages may initiate process enables a measure to be placed directly legislation by petition. In addition, statewide on the ballot if a sufficient number of and local referenda are required in numerous signatures are gathered on petitions, thus circumstances. The state legislature or any enabling citizens to bypass the legislative city, village, or county may also enact a law or body completely and avoid any threat of an ordinance contingent upon approval at a executive veto. referendum. The state legislature or these local In contrast, under the indirect initiative governing bodies may, at their discretion, process available to residents of Wisconsin submit questions to the voters in the form of cities and villages, electors may propose, via advisory referenda. petition, that the city common council or Citizens may use the recall process to village board pass a desired ordinance or remove almost any statewide or local resolution without amendment. In addition, s. government elective official. As with an 66.0101 (6) permits electors to initiate the initiative, the recall process is started via enactment, amendment, or repeal of city or petition. If enough valid signatures are village charter ordinances, using the gathered, then an election is held to decide procedures provided in s. 9.20. In either case, whether an elective official will remain in if the council or board fails to enact the office or if not, who will replace the official for measure within 30 days, the question appears the remainder of the term. on a referendum ballot for the voters to decide the issue. 1. INITIATIVE Petition Requirements. The initiative The American system of government is process begins with the circulation of based on representative democracy, in which petitions. Once begun, proponents have 60 the people elect individuals to make the laws days to gather a number of valid signatures of under which we live. In contrast, the initiative qualified city or village electors (generally, is an example of direct democracy, in which the legal residents of voting age who are U.S. people may petition to require that a proposed citizens) equal to at least 15% of the votes cast law or resolution be put to a vote in a for governor in that municipality at the last referendum election. gubernatorial election. Initiative in Cities and Villages. 1989 Wisconsin Act 192 established a Wisconsin law does not provide for a uniform petition format for all referenda, statewide initiative process. However, including city and village initiatives. Form residents of cities and villages (but not GAB-172, “Petition for Direct Legislation,” is counties, towns, school districts, or other local available on the Wisconsin Government Prepared by Dan Ritsche, Senior Legislative Analyst Reference Desk: (608) 266-0341 Web Site: www.legis.wisconsin.gov/lrb − 2 − LRB−12−WB−1 Accountability Board’s (GAB) Web site at: be notified if there are problems with the http://gab.wi.gov/forms/gab−172. petitions. Section 8.40 requires that the word The GAB has prescribed rules regarding “PETITION” must appear in boldface print at the standards by which election officials and the top of each separate petition sheet. Those governing bodies must judge the validity of signing the petition must indicate their petitions (Chapter GAB 2, Wisconsin municipality of residence for voting purposes, Administrative Code, titled “Elections Related their street address, and the date on which they Petitions”). Clerks must list any signed. insufficiencies they find in a signed and dated A certification containing the signature certificate attached to the petition, and the and address of the person who circulated the designated individual is notified and given 10 petition must appear at the bottom of each days to correct any problems. When petition page. It must state that: everything is in order, the clerk immediately S The petition circulator personally obtained forwards the proposal and the verified each of the signatures. petitions to the city council or village board. S The circulator knows that each person who The city council or village board has 30 signed is a qualified elector of the days from receipt of the petition to either pass municipality. the proposal in unaltered form or put it on the S Each signer did so with full knowledge of ballot at the next spring or general election, if the content and purpose of the petition. it is more than six weeks after the expiration of S The circulator knows that each signer the 30-day period. If the next election indicated the correct residence address. scheduled is in less than six weeks, the S Each signer signed on the date indicated. referendum is delayed until the next spring or general election, unless the council or board S The circulator is a qualified elector of this state, or if not a qualified elector of this state, agrees by a three-fourths vote of the entire that the circulator is a U.S. citizen at least 18 elected membership of the body to order a years of age who, if he or she were a resident special election for purposes of voting on the of this state, would not be disqualified from proposal. (No more than one such special voting. election may be held in any six-month period.) S The circulator is aware that the penalties for Voting on the Referendum. It is not submitting a petition with a false necessary that the full wording of the certification are a fine of up to $10,000 or proposed ordinance or resolution be printed imprisonment not to exceed three years and on the ballot. If it is not, a concise statement of six months, or both. the nature of the proposal must appear. The Although it is not required by law, the wording of the ballot question must permit the GAB recommends that the complete text of the voter to clearly indicate approval or rejection proposal (or a summary of it) be printed on or by a straightforward “yes” or “no” vote. If the attached to each petition page. majority of those voting in the referendum Initiative Timetable. If enough favor the ordinance or resolution, it takes effect signatures are gathered in the 60-day period, on the date of its official publication, which the petitions are filed with the municipal clerk. must occur within 10 days after the election. Within 15 days after receipt of the petitions, the Repeals or Amendments to an Initiative. clerk rules on their sufficiency, including City legislation adopted via initiative cannot verifying that the correct number of signatures be vetoed by the mayor, and the city council or has been obtained and whether the proposal village board may not repeal or amend the law has been properly worded. An individual within two years of its adoption. Initiated must be designated in writing as the person to legislation may, however, be repealed or LRB−12−WB−1 − 3 − amended anytime by a subsequent initiative submitting petitions signed by two-fifths of action. the legal electors of the county, in which case Limitations on Use of Municipal the county board must submit the question to Initiatives. A series of decisions by the the electors. [s. 59.05] Residents of adjoining Wisconsin Supreme Court have dealt with counties may similarly require an election on direct legislation. In particular, Landt v. the consolidation of 2 or more counties. [s. Wisconsin Dells, 30 Wis. 2d 470 (1966); Heider v. 59.08] Residents in counties having a Wauwatosa, 37 Wis. 2d 466 (1967); State ex rel. population of less than 500,000 may use the s. Althouse v. Madison, 79 Wis. 2d 97 (1977); and 9.20 initiative process to create or abolish the Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of office of elected county executive. [s. 59.17 (1)] Mt. Horeb, 263 Wis. 2d 544 (2003) have set limits Residents of an unincorporated area seeking on the use of this procedure. The court has annexation to an adjacent city or village may ruled that: initiate the action via petition and ratify it in a S Voters may exercise only such legislative referendum. [ss. 66.0203 and 66.0211] An powers as are conferred upon the city annexation of land to a city or village may be council or village board by the Wisconsin initiated by electors and property holders and Constitution or state statutes. ratified in a referendum. [s. 66.0217] S Direct legislation must relate to new History. The concept of direct democracy, legislation. It cannot be designed to amend in which the people make the laws which or repeal existing legislation that has been govern them, has ancient roots, going back at properly enacted by a city council or village least to the assemblies in Athens and the board. (This is not necessarily an absolute plebiscites in Rome. In the United States, prohibition because the supreme court has initiatives were promoted by the Populists and not specifically addressed the question of Progressives in the late 1800s and early 1900s incidental partial repeal or amendment that to facilitate government reform by bypassing may occur in the process of creating state legislatures. About half the states now affirmative legislation on a new subject.) have some form of a statewide initiative and S Direct legislation may not be used to require referendum process, with most states also the city council or village board to enact having provisions for initiatives at the local legislation that clearly conflicts with a prior government level.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Scorecard 2007-2008
    CONSERVATION SCORECARD 2007-2008 for the Wisconsin Legislature Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters extends a special thank you and congratulations to the Conservation Champions 2007-2008.* SENATORS Roger Breske John Lehman Tim Carpenter Mark Miller Spencer Coggs Jeffery Plale Russell Decker Fred Risser Jon Erpenbach Judith Robson Dave Hansen Jim Sullivan Robert Jauch Lena Taylor Pat Kreitlow Kathleen Vinehout Julie Lassa Robert Wirch REPRESENTATIVES Terese Berceau Christine Sinicki Spencer Black Tony Staskunas Jason Fields Barabara Toles Cory Mason Robert Turner Joe Parisi Terry Van Akkeren Sondy Pope-Roberts Josh Zepnick *Conservation Champions are legislators that received a perfect 100 percent. CONSERVATION SCORECARD 2007-2008 for the Wisconsin Legislature TABLE OF CONTENTS WLCV Board Members, Advisory Council Members, Contact Information . 2 Introduction . 3 Bill Descriptions. 4 Charts of Legislative Scores . 8 Map of State Assembly Scores . 14 Map of State Senate Scores. 15 Conservation Honor and Dishonor Rolls . 16 WLCV Board Members Who are your legislators? Anjali Bhasin, Madison If you aren’t sure who your state legislators are, visit our website at www.conservationvoters.org/districts or call Ann Brodek, Wind Point (800) 362-9472. Dan Collins, Mequon Joan Knoebel, Madison Thomas Miller, Waupaca About Wisconsin League of Chris Noyes, Whitefish Bay Tom Thoresen, Fitchburg, President Conservation Voters The Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters is a Advisory Council Members nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to
    [Show full text]
  • Engrossed Resolution
    2007 Senate Resolution 22 ENGROSSED RESOLUTION Relating to: the life and public service of Representative Marcia P. Coggs. Whereas, Representative Marcia P. Coggs served the city of Milwaukee and state of Wisconsin faithfully from 1976 until 1992 as a member of the assembly and was the first African−American woman elected to the legislature; and Whereas, Representative Marcia P. Coggs, as a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, was the first African−American to serve on the powerful Joint Committee on Finance; and Whereas, Representative Marcia P. Coggs devoted her life to fighting for civil rights, fair housing, excellence in education, quality health care, and after retiring from the legislature continued fighting in her community with her motto of “helping the needy, and not the greedy”; and Whereas, Representative Marcia P. Coggs helped to create a legacy of faith and political greatness through devotion to her church, Holy Redeemer Church of God in Christ, a legacy carried on in Wisconsin by her daughter, Supervisor Elizabeth Coggs−Jones, and in the state legislature by her nephews, Representative Leon Young and Senator Spencer Coggs; and Whereas, the adoption of this senate resolution is supported not only by the senate, but also by members of the assembly, including specifically Representatives Soletski, Young, Grigsby, Turner, Zepnick, Sheridan, and Toles; now, therefore, be it 2007 Senate Resolution 22 − 2− Resolved by the senate, That the members of the Wisconsin senate honor the life and legacy of Representative Marcia P. Coggs for her dedication to improving the quality of life for all citizens in Milwaukee and the state of Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curious Case of the Bradley Center, 27 Marq
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 27 Article 2 Issue 2 Spring The urC ious Case of the Bradley Center Matthew .J Parlow Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Matthew J. Parlow, The Curious Case of the Bradley Center, 27 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 271 (2017) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol27/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GANN 27.1 (DO NOT DELETE) 7/19/17 10:04 AM ARTICLES THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE BRADLEY CENTER MATTHEW J. PARLOW* I. INTRODUCTION On March 5, 1985, Jane Bradley Pettit—along with her husband, Lloyd Pettit—announced that she was going to pay for the construction of a new sports arena, the Bradley Center, and donate it to the people of the State of Wisconsin so that they could enjoy and benefit from a state-of-the-art sports facility.1 The announcement was met with much enthusiasm, appreciation, and even marvel due to Mrs. Pettit’s incredible generosity.2 But few, if any, seemed to fully understand and appreciate how unique and extraordinary Mrs. Pettit’s gift was and would become. This lack of awareness was due to at least a few contextual factors. Up until the time of Mrs. Pettit’s announcement, the United States and Canada—where all of the teams in the four major profes- sional sports leagues played3—experienced only a modest number of new * Dean and Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Educational Options in Milwaukee Public Schools James Kenneth Nelsen University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2012 From No Choice to Forced Choice to School Choice: A History of Educational Options in Milwaukee Public Schools James Kenneth Nelsen University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Other Education Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Nelsen, James Kenneth, "From No Choice to Forced Choice to School Choice: A History of Educational Options in Milwaukee Public Schools" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 12. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/12 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM NO CHOICE TO FORCED CHOICE TO SCHOOL CHOICE: A HISTORY OF EDUCATIONAL OPTIONS IN MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS by James K. Nelsen A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee December 2012 ABSTRACT FROM NO CHOICE TO FORCED CHOICE TO SCHOOL CHOICE: A HISTORY OF EDUCATIONAL OPTIONS IN MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS by James K. Nelsen The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, 2012 Under the Supervision of Dr. Amanda I. Seligman Americans cherish freedom and value local control of education. The issue of “school choice,” a movement that supports publicly funded tuition vouchers for students who attend private schools, appeared on the public agenda in the 1980s and has remained a controversial topic into the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Weston Meeting Notice & Agenda
    VILLAGE OF WESTON MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA of a Village Board, Commission, Committee, Agency, Corporation, Quasi-Municipal Corporation, or Sub-unit thereof Meeting of: BOARD OF TRUSTEES Members: White {c}, Berger, Ermeling, Jaeger, Porlier, Schuster, Ziegler Location: Weston Municipal Center (5500 Schofield Ave); Board Room Date/Time: Monday, August 4th, 2014 @ 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order. 1.1 Pledge of Allegiance. 1.2 Roll Call of Attendance. 2. Comments from the public. 3. Communications. 3.1 Recommendation from Clerk to acknowledge and place on file meeting minutes from all standing and non- standing committees, commissions or boards. 4. Consent Items for Consideration. 4.1 Approval of prior meeting minutes of 07/21/14 4.2 Approval of Vouchers. 4.3 Recommendation from Chief Sparks to approve operator licenses. 4.4 Recommendation from Village Clerk to approve Kriston Koffler as Agent for Kwik Trip 356, 5603 Bus. Hwy. 51 4.5 Recommendation from Village Clerk to approve request for Class B Beer and Class B Liquor License for Kim’s Wisconsin, LLC, Pine Ridge Family Restaurant (3705 Schofield Avenue), with contingency as listed in the attached Request for Consideration. 4.6 Recommendation from Finance Committee to approve an amendment to the FY2014 budget to continue Clerk Department Administrative Assistant position funding partnership with the WI Dept. of Vocational Rehabilitation at the expense of not to exceed $1,200. 4.7 Recommendation from Finance Committee to approve budget amendments to Room Tax Fund 29 and assign and increase expenditure authority in FY2014. 4.8 Recommendation from staff to approve Change Order #1 from Fahrner Asphalt Sealers for crack sealing on additional streets for an amount up to $14,800.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Through
    Vol. 68, No. 10 Thursday, October 23, 2008 ENDORSED CANDIDATES NOVEMBER 4 US PRESIDENT Thinking through Barack Obama, Democrat Why Obama is winning US HOUSE DISTRICT 4 By Dominique Paul Noth growing understanding of the Gwen Moore, Democrat Editor, Labor Press record. Obama, they conceded, hat a curious race for had proved neither as liberal nor WISCONSIN Legislature the White House and as tax-happy as painted — and the Congress. At this perhaps more in touch with tradi- incumbents unless indicated W Obama survives the flash- tional American optimism and point it seems that Republicans bulbs on a Milwaukee visit Senate can only win November 4 by frugality and even broader fami- emerging than Reagan District 4: Lena Taylor discouraging voter turnout while ly values than his main opponent Democrats. the Democrats must strive for for the presidency. His response District 6: Spencer Coggs Obama has been up 10% in record turnout to guarantee a to financial crisis also reassured District 8: Sheldon Wasserman, recent polls of battleground mandate for change. them that he had the experience states. He is ahead or competing Democrat, challenger Six months ago, there were and temperament. in 10 states that went for Bush in District 20: Clyde Winter, Democratic strategists who were They didn’t say this easily. 2004. He is also up 10% among Independent, challenger counting on conservative cool- Several remained cautious about women in polls, up among col- ness to John McCain to keep his sharing these views because they Assembly lege-educated suburban white party from the polls. Some even grew up disliking Democrats – voters including soccer moms, District 7: Peggy Krusick called it the key to a Barack and because McCain forces were and probably hockey moms, too, District 8: Pedro Colon Wasserman, Page 2 Obama victory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Wisconsin Blue Book
    Significant events in Wisconsin history First nations 1668 Nicolas Perrot opened fur trade Wisconsin’s original residents were with Wisconsin Indians near Green Bay. Native American hunters who arrived 1672 Father Allouez and Father Louis here about 14,000 years ago. The area’s André built the St. François Xavier mis- first farmers appear to have been the sion at De Pere. Hopewell people, who raised corn, 1673 Louis Jolliet and Father Jacques squash, and pumpkins around 2,000 Marquette traveled the length of the years ago. They were also hunters and Mississippi River. fishers, and their trade routes stretched 1679 to the Atlantic Coast and the Gulf of Daniel Greysolon Sieur du Lhut Mexico. Later arrivals included the (Duluth) explored the western end of Chippewa, Ho-Chunk (Winnebago), Lake Superior. Mohican/Munsee, Menominee, Oneida, 1689 Perrot asserts the sovereignty of Potawatomi, and Sioux. France over various Wisconsin Indian tribes. Under the flag of France 1690 Lead mines are discovered in Wis- The written history of the state began consin and Iowa. with the accounts of French explorers. 1701–38 The Fox Indian Wars occurred. The French explored areas of Wiscon- 1755 Wisconsin Indians, under Charles sin, named places, and established trad- Langlade, helped defeat British Gen- ing posts; however, they were interested eral Braddock during the French and in the fur trade, rather than agricultural Indian War. settlement, and were never present in 1763 large numbers. The Treaty of Paris is signed, mak- ing Wisconsin part of British colonial 1634 Jean Nicolet became the first territory. known European to reach Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012 Wisconsin Blue Book: Statistics
    STATISTICS: HISTORY 679 HIGHLIGHTS OF HISTORY IN WISCONSIN History — On May 29, 1848, Wisconsin became the 30th state in the Union, but the state’s written history dates back more than 300 years to the time when the French first encountered the diverse Native Americans who lived here. In 1634, the French explorer Jean Nicolet landed at Green Bay, reportedly becoming the first European to visit Wisconsin. The French ceded the area to Great Britain in 1763, and it became part of the United States in 1783. First organized under the Northwest Ordinance, the area was part of various territories until creation of the Wisconsin Territory in 1836. Since statehood, Wisconsin has been a wheat farming area, a lumbering frontier, and a preeminent dairy state. Tourism has grown in importance, and industry has concentrated in the eastern and southeastern part of the state. Politically, the state has enjoyed a reputation for honest, efficient government. It is known as the birthplace of the Republican Party and the home of Robert M. La Follette, Sr., founder of the progressive movement. Political Balance — After being primarily a one-party state for most of its existence, with the Republican and Progressive Parties dominating during portions of the state’s first century, Wisconsin has become a politically competitive state in recent decades. The Republicans gained majority control in both houses in the 1995 Legislature, an advantage they last held during the 1969 session. Since then, control of the senate has changed several times. In 2009, the Democrats gained control of both houses for the first time since 1993; both houses returned to Republican control in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance Report State of Wisconsin
    CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT STATE OF WISCONSIN Is this report an Amendment? No COMMITTEE IDENTIFICATION Name of Committee Friends of Patrick Miles Address 5410 North Pass OFFICE USE ONLY City, State, ZIP McFarland, WI 53558 GAB # ID NAME OF REPORT Jan 20__ Continuing Pre-Primary 20__ Spring Fall Special July 20__ Continuing Pre-election 2010 Spring Fall Special SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Column A Column B Audited Totals 1. RECEIPTS This Period YTD Office Use Only A. Contributions including Loans from Individuals $ 5,444.88 $ 5,444.88 B. Contributions from Committees (Transfers-In) $ 700.00 $ 700.00 C. Other Income and Commercial Loans $ 2.00 $ 2.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS (Add totals from 1A, 1B, and 1C) $ 6,146.88 $ 6,146.88 1. DISBURSEMENTS A. Gross Expenditures $ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 B. Contributions to Committees (Transfers-Out) $ - $ - TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS (Add totals from 2A and 2B) $ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 CASH SUMMARY Cash Balance at Beginning of Report$ 2,564.47 $ 2,564.47 Total Receipts$ 6,146.88 $ 6,146.88 Subtotal$ 8,711.35 $ 8,711.35 Total Disbursements$ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 CASH BALANCE AT END OF REPORT $ 5,214.62 $ 5,214.62 INCURRED OBLIGATIONS (at close of period) $ 755.61 LOANS (at close of period) $ - I certify that I have examined this report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. Type or Print Name of Candidate or Treasurer Signature of Candidate or Treasurer Date Daytime Phone NOTE: The information on this form is required by ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance Report State of Wisconsin Gab-2
    CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT STATE OF WISCONSIN GAB-2 COMMITTEE IDENTIFICATION Filing Period Name: July Continuing 2010 OFFICE USE ONLY Name of Committee: Friends of G. Spencer Coggs Street Address: 7819 W. Potomac Ave. City, State and Zip: Milwaukee, WI 53222 GAB ID: 0101390 SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Column A Column B This Period Calendar Year-To-Date 1. RECEIPTS 1A. Contributions (Including Loans) from Individuals $27,945.00 $27,945.00 1B. Contributions from Committees (Transfers-In) $31,689.00 $31,689.00 1C. Other Income and Commercial Loans $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS (Add totals from 1A, 1B and 1C) $59,634.00 $59,634.00 2. DISBURSEMENTS 2A. Gross Expenditures $20,855.87 $20,855.87 2B. Contributions to Committees (Transfers-Out) $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS (Add totals from 2A and 2B) $20,855.87 $20,855.87 CASH SUMMARY Cash Balance Beginning of Report* $3,940.43 Total Receipts $59,634.00 Subtotal $63,574.43 Total Disbursements $20,855.87 CASH BALANCE END OF REPORT* $42,718.56 INCURRED OBLIGATIONS (Balance at the Close of This Period-3A) $0.00 LOANS (Balance at the Close of This Period-3B) $0.00 * Cash Balance as reported by committee I certify that I have examined this report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. Type or Print Name of Candidate or Treasurer: Signature of Candidate or Treasurer Date: Coggs, Gershia Daytime Phone: NOTE: The information on this form is required by ss.11.06, 11.20, Wis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Wisconsin Blue Book
    STATISTICS: HISTORY 677 HIGHLIGHTS OF HISTORY IN WISCONSIN History — On May 29, 1848, Wisconsin became the 30th state in the Union, but the state’s written history dates back more than 300 years to the time when the French first encountered the diverse Native Americans who lived here. In 1634, the French explorer Jean Nicolet landed at Green Bay, reportedly becoming the first European to visit Wisconsin. The French ceded the area to Great Britain in 1763, and it became part of the United States in 1783. First organized under the Northwest Ordinance, the area was part of various territories until creation of the Wisconsin Territory in 1836. Since statehood, Wisconsin has been a wheat farming area, a lumbering frontier, and a preeminent dairy state. Tourism has grown in importance, and industry has concentrated in the eastern and southeastern part of the state. Politically, the state has enjoyed a reputation for honest, efficient government. It is known as the birthplace of the Republican Party and the home of Robert M. La Follette, Sr., founder of the progressive movement. Political Balance — After being primarily a one-party state for most of its existence, with the Republican and Progressive Parties dominating during portions of the state’s first century, Wisconsin has become a politically competitive state in recent decades. The Republicans gained majority control in both houses in the 1995 Legislature, an advantage they last held during the 1969 session. Since then, control of the senate has changed several times. In 2009, the Democrats gained control of both houses for the first time since 1993; both houses returned to Republican control in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Journal
    --- - - -- -----.- .. __ . -- - Ninetieth Regular Session WEDNESDAY, September 2, 1992 The chief clerk makes the foUowing entries under the The report for the period April I, 1992, through June above date. 30, 1992, is attached. Sina:rely, PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS James R. Klauser State of Wisconsin Secretary ~tofA~tration State of Wisconsin AUSUSt 18, 1992 Legislative Audit Bureau To the Honorable the Lesislature: September I, 1992 This report is transmitted as required by sec. To the Honorable the Legislature: 20.002(11)(f) of the Wisconsin Statutes, (for distribution to the appropriate standing committees under sec. We have completed an evaluation ofthe ~t 13.172(3) Stats.), and confirms that the Department of of Natural Resoun:es' Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Administration has found it necessary to exercise the Abatement Program. This is the Second of two reports "temporary reaUocation of balances" authority provided mandated by Wisconsin Act 27, the 1987-89 Biennial by this section in order to meet payment responsibilities Budget. We completed the first evaluation in May 1989. and cover resultins negative balances during the month The Program is managed in cooperation with the of July, 1992. Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer On July 13, 1992, the Transportation Fund balana: Protection's Soil and Water Resource Management was $-14.9 miUion. This shortfall continued until July Program. 23, 1992 when the balana: reached $+9.2 million. The Sina: our last evaluation, the Department of Natural shortfall was due to delay in the receipt of Revenue Bond Resources has improved some financial practices related proceeds. to the Nonpoint program, and the problem of a recurring On July 20, 1992, the Environmental Qean-up Fund large balana: has been corrected.
    [Show full text]