DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Genetic Transformation in Acinetobacter Sp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Genetic Transformation in Acinetobacter Sp ETDE-DE—1442 Dr. rer. nat. Larissa Hendrickx Natural Genetic Transformation in Acinetobacter sp. BD413 Biofilms: Introducing natural genetic transformation as a tool for bioenhancement of biofilm reactors Berichte aus Wasseigute- und Abfallwirtschaft Technische Universitat Munchen 2002 i k Nr. 171 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Natural Genetic Transformation in Acinetobacter sp. BD413 Biofilms: Introducing natural genetic transformation as a tool for bioenhancement of biofilm reactors von Dr. rer. nat. Larissa Hendrickx Herausgeber: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h. c. Peter A. Wilderer Berichte aus Wassergtite- und Abfallwirtschaft Technische Universit&t Mflnchen Berichtsheft Nr. 171 ISSN 0942-914X 2002 Alle Rechtc vorbehalten. Wiedergabe nur mit Genehmigung der Gesellschaft zur FOrderung des Lchrstuhls fttr WassergOte- und Abfallwirtschaft der Technischen Universitat Mtlnchen e.V., Am Coulombwall, 85748 Garehing Dmck: Hieronymus Buchreproduktions GmbH, LerchenstraBe 5,80995 Mtlnchen °D. 'oor mij*i tiade/i 1943-1991 SUMMARY i ZUSAMMENFASSUNG iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix TABLE OF CONTENTS xii I. INTRODUCTION 2 A. Introduction 4 B. Mission statement 5 H. STATE OF KNOWLEDGE 6 A. Biological enhancement of bioremediation 8 I. Introduction 8 2. Bioenhancement 9 3. Waste water treatment 10 3.1. Types of waste water treatment plants 10 3.2. The advantage of biofilter plants 11 4. Tackling bioenhancement of biofilters 12 Overview 14 Some open questions IS B. Bacterial life in biofilms 16 1. Introduction 16 2. How biofilms develop 17 3. Use of biofilms 18 4. How bacteria communicate 18 5. Signals synthesized by Acinetobacter sp. BD413 20 6. How bacteria defend themselves in biofilms 21 6.1. Diffusion limitation 21 6.2. Physiological limitation 22 6.3. The protected biofilm phenotype 23 6.4. Persisters 23 Overview 24 Some open questions 25 C. Natural genetic transformation 26 1. Introduction 26 2. Mechanisms of natural genetic transformation 27 2.1. Release, dispersal and persistence of the DNA in the environment 28 2.2. The development of competence for DNA uptake by cells in the 29 natural habitat 2.3. The interaction and uptake of DNA with competent cells 31 2.4. The recombination and expression of acquired DNA 33 3. Natural genetic transformation in biofilms 33 4. Regulation of natural genetic transformation 35 4.1. The influence of environmental conditions on natural transformation 36 4.2. Induction of competence for natural genetic transformation 37 4.3. Barriers to natural genetic transformation 38 Overview 40 Some open questions 41 m. MATERIALS AND METHODS 42 A. Used bacterial strains and plasmids 44 B. Media and solutions 44 1. Luria-Bertani medium (LB) 44 2. M9 minimal medium 45 3. Tris minimal medium 45 4. Heat sensitive stock solutions 46 5. Plasmid construction solutions 46 6. Hybridisation solutions (Amann, 1995) 47 6.1. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution 47 6.2. TrisHCl 48 63. EDTA 48 6.4. Hybridization buffer for a certain formaldehyde concentration 48 6.5. Washing buffer for the corresponding formaldehyde concentration 48 in tiie hybridization buffer C. Standard microbiological methods 49 1. Plasmid DNA extraction of £ coli strains based on the method of Bimboim 49 and Doly (Bimboim and Doly, 1979) 2. DNA cloning techniques 49 2.1. DNA restriction analysis 49 2.2. Cloning < 50 3. DNA degradation test 51 4. Triparental conjugation 51 5. Standard natural genetic transformation in pure cultures 51 D. In situ quantification of gene transfer in biofilms 52 1. Tools 52 1.1. The confocal laser scanning microscope 52 1.2. The green fluorescent protein 53 1.2.1. GFP as a tool for in situ detection of gene transfer 53 1.2.2. Monitoring with dual/multiple fluorescence labelling using green 54 fluorescent protein variants and homologues Z Preparation of the samples 55 2.1. In situ natural genetic transformation in biofilms grown on slides 55 2.1.1. Growth of biofilms on slides 55 ; 2.1.2. Transformation on slides 55 2.1.3. Fixation of biofilms on slides (optional) 56 2.1.4. Staining biofilms grown on slides with Syto 17 or Syto 60 nucleic acid 57 stains (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon) 2.1.5. Hybridisation of biofilms on slides with rRNA-directed oligonucleotide 57 probes -v ' ■ 22. In situ natural genetic transformation in biofilms grown in flow cells 57 2.2.1. Growth of biofilms in flow cells 57 2.2.2. Conjugation in flow cells 59 2.2.3. Transformation in flow cells 59 2.2.4. Fixation of biofilms in flowcells 59 2.2.5. Staining biofilms in flow channels with nucleic acid stains 59 2.2.6. Hybridisation of biofilms in flow cells with rRNA-directed 59 oligonucleotide probes 3. Microscopic in situ monitoring of the samples " • ■ 60 3.1. Transformation in a monoculture biofilm 60 3.2. Conjugation betweeaAcinetobacter sp. BD413 and Ralstonia 61 metallidurans CH34 4. Automated image acquisition and semi-automated digital image processing 61 5. Mathematical parameters 62 IV. RESULTS 66 A. Use of gfp and flj>-variants for in situ monitoring of natural genetic 68 transformation in monoculture Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms 1. Introduction 68 2. Plasmid constructions . 69 3. Integration of the fluorescence reporter genes 71 4. Application form of transforming plasmid 71 5. Colocalization 72 6. Spectral overlap 73 7. Reproducibility of in situ transformation using CLSM 74 8. Conclusions . 75 B. Evaluation of eyfp as a disadvantageous gene in Acinetobacter sp. BD413 76 1. Introduction 78 2. Viability and fluorescence of transformants and transconjugants 82 3. Survival of the compromised transformant in a mixed biofilm 82 4. Stability of the recombinant plasmids 84 5. Dissemination of plasmids by transformation in suspended cultures 85 6. Dissemination of plasmids by transformation in biofilms 85 7. Dissemination of plasmids by conjugation in a predefined biofilm 86 8. Conclusions 87 C. In situ quantification of natural genetic transformation in monoculture 88 Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms 1. Introduction 88 2. Effect of biofilm age on natural genetic transformation 89 3. Effect of the concentration of added free DNA 92 4. Effect of biofilm development on natural genetic transformation 94 5. Effect of biofilm ontogenesis on natural genetic transformation 96 6. Conclusions 98 D. Natural genetic transformation of a disadvantageous gene in monoculture 100 Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms 1. Introduction 100 2. Effect of DNA concentration on transformation with a disadvantageous gene 101 2.1. Presence office transformable DNA? 104 2.2. Inhibition of competence development of host cells and/or DNA 105 uptake from the environment? 2.3. Problematic incorporation of the gene, expression of the 107 incorporated genes and/or maturation of the gene product? 2.4. Limiting transformant survival? 109 3. Prolonged challenge with detrimental DNA 110 4. Conclusion 113 V. DISCUSSION 114 A. Use of gfp and ^-variants for the use of monitoring natural genetic 116 transformation in biofilms B. Evaluation of eyfp as a disadvantageous gene in Acinetobacter sp. BD413 118 C. In situ quantification of natural genetic transformation in monoculture 120 Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms D. Natural genetic transformation of a disadvantageous gene in monoculture 124 Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms E. Outlook 128 VI. CONCLUSION 130 A. Main points 132 B. Answers to some of die open questions in: 133 1. Chapter C: Horizontal gene transfer by natural genetic transformation 133 2. Chapter B: Natural genetic transformation and transformant cells in a biofilm 134 3. Chapter A: Natural genetic transformation as a tool for bioenhancement of 134 biofilm reactors VD. REFERENCES 136 Summary Use of gfp and gfp-variants for in situ monitoring SUMMARY This study focussed on the localization and quantification of natural genetic transformation using neutral and disadvantageous genes in monoculture biofilms to investigate gene transfer and expression of the transferred genes in the absence of a selective advantage. Data obtained by this investigation were regarded as initial steps for evaluating the applicability of adding catabolic traits into the indigenous bacterial community of biofilm reactors by in situ natural genetic transformation. Because Acinetobacter spp. strains are readily found in waste water treatment plants and because Acinetobacter sp. BD413 possesses a high effective level of competence, natural genetic transformation was investigated in monoculture Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms. The genes used for transformation encoded for the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its variants. Monitoring of transformation events were performed with the use of automated confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and semi automated digital image processing and analysis. The study was divided into four parts: A. Use of gfp and g^-variants for in situ monitoring of natural genetic transformation in monoculture Acinetobacter sp. BD413 biofilms B. Evaluation of the gene encoding for the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (eyfp) as a disadvantageous gene C. In situ quantification of natural genetic transformation in biofilms D. Natural genetic transformation of a disadvantageous gene in biofilms A. USE OF gfp AND ^-VARIANTS FOR MONITORING NATURAL GENETIC TRANSFORMATION IN BIOFILMS Plasmids were constructed with two different vectors, carrying gfp, or with one vector carrying either gfp or the gfp variants eyfp and ecfp (the gene encoding for the enhanced cyan fluorescent protein). Constructs built on plasmid vector pRK415 gave the most desirable features: integration in the genome was established as a plasmid; the host expressed i Summary Evaluation of eyfp as a disadvantageous gene desired fluorescence; and transfer rates were in a measurable range. General nucleic acid stains were employed for the visualization of the total biofilm and could be combined with green fluorescent protein expression and variants for monitoring gene transfer events. Scanning of large volumes of the biofilm (1.2x10? pm3) resulted in reliable and repeatable results. Hence, natural genetic transformation could be monitored in situ in monoculture biofilms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acinetobacter Baumannii Resistance: a Real Challenge for Clinicians
    antibiotics Review Acinetobacter baumannii Resistance: A Real Challenge for Clinicians Rosalino Vázquez-López 1,* , Sandra Georgina Solano-Gálvez 2, Juan José Juárez Vignon-Whaley 1 , Jorge Andrés Abello Vaamonde 1 , Luis Andrés Padró Alonzo 1, Andrés Rivera Reséndiz 1, Mauricio Muleiro Álvarez 1, Eunice Nabil Vega López 3, Giorgio Franyuti-Kelly 3 , Diego Abelardo Álvarez-Hernández 1 , Valentina Moncaleano Guzmán 1, Jorge Ernesto Juárez Bañuelos 1, José Marcos Felix 4, Juan Antonio González Barrios 5 and Tomás Barrientos Fortes 6 1 Departamento de Microbiología del Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), FCS, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico; [email protected] (J.J.J.V.-W.); [email protected] (J.A.A.V.); [email protected] (L.A.P.A.); [email protected] (A.R.R.); [email protected] (M.M.Á.); [email protected] (D.A.Á.-H.); [email protected] (V.M.G.); [email protected] (J.E.J.B.) 2 Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico 04510, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Medical IMPACT, Infectious Diseases Department, Mexico City 53900, Mexico; [email protected] (E.N.V.L.); [email protected] (G.F.-K.) 4 Coordinación Ciclos Clínicos Medicina, FCS, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico; [email protected] 5 Laboratorio de Medicina Genómica, Hospital Regional “1º de Octubre”, ISSSTE, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 1669, Lindavista, Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de Mexico 07300, Mexico; [email protected] 6 Dirección Sistema Universitario de Salud de la Universidad Anáhuac México (SUSA), Huixquilucan 52786, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +52-56-270210 (ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Threat Level Urgent
    CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT ACINETOBACTER THREAT LEVEL URGENT 8,500 700 $281M Estimated cases Estimated Estimated attributable in hospitalized deaths in 2017 healthcare costs in 2017 patients in 2017 Acinetobacter bacteria can survive a long time on surfaces. Nearly all carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter infections happen in patients who recently received care in a healthcare facility. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW CASES OVER TIME ■ Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter cause pneumonia Continued infection control and appropriate antibiotic use and wound, bloodstream, and urinary tract infections. are important to maintain decreases in carbapenem-resistant These infections tend to occur in patients in intensive Acinetobacter infections. care units. ■ Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter can carry mobile genetic elements that are easily shared between bacteria. Some can make a carbapenemase enzyme, which makes carbapenem antibiotics ineffective and rapidly spreads resistance that destroys these important drugs. ■ Some Acinetobacter are resistant to nearly all antibiotics and few new drugs are in development. CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT ACINETOBACTER A THREAT IN HEALTHCARE TREATMENT OVER TIME Acinetobacter is a challenging threat to hospitalized Treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem- patients because it frequently contaminates healthcare resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are extremely limited. facility surfaces and shared medical equipment. If not There are few new drugs in development. addressed through infection control measures, including rigorous
    [Show full text]
  • Acinetobacter Baumannii Biofilm Formation
    Structural basis for Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation Natalia Pakharukovaa, Minna Tuittilaa, Sari Paavilainena, Henri Malmia, Olena Parilovaa, Susann Tenebergb, Stefan D. Knightc, and Anton V. Zavialova,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turku, Joint Biotechnology Laboratory, Arcanum, 20500 Turku, Finland; bInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden; and cDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Centre, Uppsala University, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden Edited by Scott J. Hultgren, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, and approved April 11, 2018 (received for review January 19, 2018) Acinetobacter baumannii—a leading cause of nosocomial infec- donor sequence, this subunit is predicted to contain an additional tions—has a remarkable capacity to persist in hospital environ- domain (7). This implies that CsuE is located at the pilus tip. Since ments and medical devices due to its ability to form biofilms. many two-domain tip subunits in classical systems have been Biofilm formation is mediated by Csu pili, assembled via the “ar- shown to act as host cell binding adhesins (TDAs) (13–16), CsuE chaic” chaperone–usher pathway. The X-ray structure of the CsuC- could also play a role in bacterial attachment to biotic and abiotic CsuE chaperone–adhesin preassembly complex reveals the basis substrates. However, adhesion properties of Csu subunits are not for bacterial attachment to abiotic surfaces. CsuE exposes three known, and the mechanism of archaic pili-mediated biofilm for- hydrophobic finger-like loops at the tip of the pilus. Decreasing mation remains enigmatic. Here, we report the crystal structure of the hydrophobicity of these abolishes bacterial attachment, sug- the CsuE subunit complexed with the CsuC chaperone.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4. Guidance Document on Horizontal Gene Transfer Between Bacteria
    306 - PART 2. DOCUMENTS ON MICRO-ORGANISMS Section 4. Guidance document on horizontal gene transfer between bacteria 1. Introduction Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) 1 refers to the stable transfer of genetic material from one organism to another without reproduction. The significance of horizontal gene transfer was first recognised when evidence was found for ‘infectious heredity’ of multiple antibiotic resistance to pathogens (Watanabe, 1963). The assumed importance of HGT has changed several times (Doolittle et al., 2003) but there is general agreement now that HGT is a major, if not the dominant, force in bacterial evolution. Massive gene exchanges in completely sequenced genomes were discovered by deviant composition, anomalous phylogenetic distribution, great similarity of genes from distantly related species, and incongruent phylogenetic trees (Ochman et al., 2000; Koonin et al., 2001; Jain et al., 2002; Doolittle et al., 2003; Kurland et al., 2003; Philippe and Douady, 2003). There is also much evidence now for HGT by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) being an ongoing process that plays a primary role in the ecological adaptation of prokaryotes. Well documented is the example of the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes by HGT that allowed bacterial populations to rapidly adapt to a strong selective pressure by agronomically and medically used antibiotics (Tschäpe, 1994; Witte, 1998; Mazel and Davies, 1999). MGEs shape bacterial genomes, promote intra-species variability and distribute genes between distantly related bacterial genera. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between bacteria is driven by three major processes: transformation (the uptake of free DNA), transduction (gene transfer mediated by bacteriophages) and conjugation (gene transfer by means of plasmids or conjugative and integrated elements).
    [Show full text]
  • Acinetobacter Pollinis Sp
    TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION Alvarez- Perez et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021;71:004783 DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.004783 Acinetobacter pollinis sp. nov., Acinetobacter baretiae sp. nov. and Acinetobacter rathckeae sp. nov., isolated from floral nectar and honey bees Sergio Alvarez- Perez1,2†, Lydia J. Baker3†, Megan M. Morris4, Kaoru Tsuji5, Vivianna A. Sanchez3, Tadashi Fukami6, Rachel L. Vannette7, Bart Lievens1 and Tory A. Hendry3,* Abstract A detailed evaluation of eight bacterial isolates from floral nectar and animal visitors to flowers shows evidence that they rep- resent three novel species in the genus Acinetobacter. Phylogenomic analysis shows the closest relatives of these new isolates are Acinetobacter apis, Acinetobacter boissieri and Acinetobacter nectaris, previously described species associated with floral nectar and bees, but high genome- wide sequence divergence defines these isolates as novel species. Pairwise comparisons of the average nucleotide identity of the new isolates compared to known species is extremely low (<83 %), thus confirming that these samples are representative of three novel Acinetobacter species, for which the names Acinetobacter pollinis sp. nov., Aci- netobacter baretiae sp. nov. and Acinetobacter rathckeae sp. nov. are proposed. The respective type strains are SCC477T (=TSD- 214T=LMG 31655T), B10AT (=TSD-213T=LMG 31702T) and EC24T (=TSD-215T=LMG 31703T=DSM 111781T). The genus Acinetobacter (Gammaproteobacteria) is a physi- gene trees, but was nevertheless identified and described as ologically and metabolically diverse group of bacteria cur- a new species with the name Acinetobacter apis. However, rently including 65 validly published and correct names, plus several other tentative designations and effectively but not the diversity of acinetobacters associated with flowering validly published species names (https:// lpsn.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretory and Circulating Bacterial Small Rnas: a Mini-Review of the Literature Yi Fei Wang and Jin Fu*
    Wang and Fu ExRNA (2019) 1:14 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41544-019-0015-z ExRNA REVIEW Open Access Secretory and circulating bacterial small RNAs: a mini-review of the literature Yi Fei Wang and Jin Fu* Abstract Background: Over the past decade, small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) have been characterized as important post- transcriptional regulators in bacteria and other microorganisms. Secretable sRNAs from both pathogenic and non- pathogenic bacteria have been identified, revealing novel insight into interspecies communications. Recent advances in the understanding of the secretory sRNAs, including extracellular vesicle-transported sRNAs and circulating sRNAs, have raised great interest. Methods: We performed a literature search of the database PubMed, surveying the present stage of knowledge in the field of secretory and circulating bacterial sRNAs. Conclusion: Extracellular bacterial sRNAs play an active role in host-microbe interactions. The findings concerning the secretory and circulating bacterial sRNAs may kindle an eager interest in biomarker discovery for infectious bacterial diseases. Keywords: Small non-coding RNA, Bacterial RNA, Secretory RNA, Outer membrane vesicle, Circulating biomarker Background active players in host-microbe communications and po- Small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) are a class of tential circulating biomarkers for infectious diseases. In post-transcriptional regulators in bacteria and eukaryotes. this review, we survey the current stage of knowledge Bacterial sRNAs usually refer to non-coding RNAs ap- concerning secretory sRNAs in pathogenic bacteria, proximately 50–400 nt in length that are transcribed from their detection in the circulation, and discuss their po- intergenic regions of the bacterial genome [1]. The first tential clinical applications.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria? How Does Acinetobacter
    Patient Information Sheet for Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAb) What is Acinetobacter? Acinetobacter is a group of bacteria commonly found in soil and water. It can also be found on the skin of healthy people. Acinetobacter can live for long periods of time. It can live on both wet and dry surfaces in hospitals and nursing homes. Acinetobacter can cause serious illness if it enters the body where it is not normally found. Who is at risk for infection? Healthy people rarely get serious infections from Acinetobacter. Acinetobacter infections almost always occur in hospitals or nursing homes. Patients are most likely to become ill if they: are in the hospital a long time have been in a nursing home or long-term care setting have taken antibiotics used to kill bacteria for long periods have a disease that affects the body’s ability to fight infection have medical devices such as urinary catheters or ventilators have chronic lung disease or diabetes have open wounds What are multidrug-resistant bacteria? “Drug-resistant” or “multidrug-resistant” means that bacteria have developed a way of fighting or resisting the antibiotics usually used to kill them. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are more difficult to treat. How does Acinetobacter spread? Acinetobacter can be spread by person-to-person contact, by contaminated hands, or by contact with contaminated surfaces (door handles, bedside tables, medical equipment, etc.). How can I help prevent the spread of MDRAb? Hand hygiene! Take these steps to prevent the spread of Acinetobacter: Wash your hands with soap and water for 15-20 seconds, or use an alcohol hand rub.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Aharon Abbo,* Shiri Navon-Venezia,* Orly Hammer-Muntz,* Tami Krichali,* Yardena Siegman-Igra,* and Yehuda Carmeli*
    RESEARCH Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Aharon Abbo,* Shiri Navon-Venezia,* Orly Hammer-Muntz,* Tami Krichali,* Yardena Siegman-Igra,* and Yehuda Carmeli* To understand the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant antimicrobial agents, contributes to the organism’s fitness (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii and define individual risk and enables it to spread in the hospital setting. factors for multidrug resistance, we used epidemiologic The nosocomial epidemiology of this organism is com- methods, performed organism typing by pulsed-field gel plex. Villegas and Hartstein reviewed Acinetobacter out- electrophoresis (PFGE), and conducted a matched case- breaks occurring from 1977 to 2000 and hypothesized that control retrospective study. We investigated 118 patients, on 27 wards in Israel, in whom MDR A. baumannii was iso- endemicity, increasing rate, and increasing or new resist- lated from clinical cultures. Each case-patient had a control ance to antimicrobial drugs in a collection of isolates sug- without MDR A. baumannii and was matched for hospital gest transmission. These authors suggested that length of stay, ward, and calendar time. The epidemiologic transmission should be confirmed by using a discriminato- investigation found small clusters of up to 6 patients each ry genotyping test (15). The importance of genotyping with no common identified source. Ten different PFGE tests is illustrated by outbreaks that were shown by classic clones were found, of which 2 dominated. The PFGE pat- epidemiologic methods and were thought to be caused by tern differed within temporospatial clusters, and antimicro- a single isolate transmitted between patients; however, bial drug susceptibility patterns varied within and between when molecular typing of the organisms was performed, a clones.
    [Show full text]
  • Phage As Agents of Lateral Gene Transfer Carlos Canchaya, Ghislain Fournous, Sandra Chibani-Chennoufi, Marie-Lise Dillmann and Harald Bru¨ Ssowã
    417 Phage as agents of lateral gene transfer Carlos Canchaya, Ghislain Fournous, Sandra Chibani-Chennoufi, Marie-Lise Dillmann and Harald Bru¨ ssowà When establishing lysogeny, temperate phages integrate their Lateral gene transfer genome as a prophage into the bacterial chromosome. With about 100 sequenced genomes of bacteria in the Prophages thus constitute in many bacteria a substantial part public database and many more to come, genomics has of laterally acquired DNA. Some prophages contribute changed our understanding of microbiology. In fact, the lysogenic conversion genes that are of selective advantage to genomes of bacteria are remarkably fluid. A substantial the bacterial host. Occasionally, phages are also involved part of the bacterial DNA is not transferred from the in the lateral transfer of other mobile DNA elements or parental cell to its descendent (‘vertical’ transfer), but is bacterial DNA. Recent advances in the field of genomics acquired horizontally by transformation, conjugation or have revealed a major impact by phages on bacterial transduction (‘lateral’ transfer) [1]. The replacement of chromosome evolution. a tree-like by a web-like representation of the phyloge- netic relationship between bacteria is a visual expression Addresses of this change in perception of microbial evolution. An Nestle´ Research Centre, CH-1000 Lausanne 26, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, important element of mobile DNA is bacteriophages. Switzerland à Infection of a bacterial cell with a temperate phage e-mail: [email protected] (Figure 1a,b) can have two outcomes: multiplication of the phage with concomitant lysis of the bacterial host Current Opinion in Microbiology 2003, 6:417–424 (Figure 1c) or lysogenization, (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Transfer Agents in Plant Pathogenic Bacteria: Comparative Mobilomics, Genomic Survey and Recombinogenic Impacts
    Gene Transfer Agents in Plant Pathogenic Bacteria: Comparative Mobilomics, Genomic Survey and Recombinogenic Impacts Mustafa O Jibrin University of Florida Gerald V. Minsavage University of Florida Erica M. Goss University of Florida Pamela D. Roberts University of Florida Jeffrey B Jones ( [email protected] ) University of Florida https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-470X Research article Keywords: Prokaryotic mobile genetic elements Posted Date: August 29th, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.10679/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/18 Abstract Background Gene transfer agents (GTAs) are phage-like mediators of gene transfer in bacterial species. Typically, strains of a bacteria species which have GTA shows more recombination than strains without GTAs. GTA-mediated gene transfer activity has been shown for few bacteria, with Rhodobacter capsulatus being the prototypical GTA. GTA have not been previously studied in plant pathogenic bacteria. A recent study inferring recombination in strains of the bacterial spot xanthomonads identied a Nigerian lineage which showed unusual recombination background. We initially set out to understand genomic drivers of recombination in this genome by focusing on mobile genetic elements. Results We identied a unique cluster which was present in the Nigerian strain but absent in other sequenced strains of bacterial spot xanthomonads. The protein sequence of a gene within this cluster contained the GTA_TIM domain that is present in bacteria with GTA. We identied GTA clusters in other Xanthomonas species as well as species of Agrobacterium and Pantoea. Recombination analyses showed that generally, strains of Xanthomonas with GTA have more inferred recombination events than strains without GTA, which could lead to genome divergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems Through Horizontal Gene Transfer
    REVIEW published: 19 February 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173 Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer Christian J. H. von Wintersdorff 1, John Penders 1, 2, Julius M. van Niekerk 2, Nathan D. Mills 1, Snehali Majumder 2, Lieke B. van Alphen 2, Paul H. M. Savelkoul 1, 2, 3 and Petra F. G. Wolffs 1, 2* 1 Department of Medical Microbiology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria has been a rising problem for public health in recent decades. It is becoming increasingly recognized that not only antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) encountered in clinical pathogens are of relevance, but rather, all pathogenic, commensal as well as Edited by: Gilberto Igrejas, environmental bacteria—and also mobile genetic elements and bacteriophages—form University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto a reservoir of ARGs (the resistome) from which pathogenic bacteria can acquire Douro, Portugal resistance via horizontal gene transfer (HGT). HGT has caused antibiotic resistance to Reviewed by: spread from commensal and environmental species to pathogenic ones, as has been Jose Luis Balcazar, Catalan Institute for Water Research, shown for some clinically important ARGs. Of the three canonical mechanisms of HGT, Spain conjugation is thought to have the greatest influence on the dissemination of ARGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Sample Return Backward Contamination
    Mars Sample Return backward contamination – Strategic advice and requirements Report from the ESF-ESSC Study Group on MSR Planetary Protection Requirements European Science Foundation (ESF) European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC) The European Science Foundation (ESF) is an The European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC), independent, non-governmental organisation, the established in 1975, grew from the need to give members of which are 72 national funding agencies, European space scientists a voice in the space arena research performing agencies and academies from 30 at a time when successive US space science missions countries. and NASA’s Apollo missions dominated space The strength of ESF lies in its influential membership research. More than 35 years later, the ESSC actively and in its ability to bring together the different domains collaborates with the European Space Agency (ESA), of European science in order to meet the challenges of the European Commission, national space agencies the future. and the ESF Member Organisations. This has made Since its establishment in 1974, ESF, which has its ESSC a reference name in space sciences within headquarters in Strasbourg with offices in Brussels Europe. and Ostend, has assembled a host of organisations The mission of the ESSC today is to provide an that span all disciplines of science, to create a independent forum for scientists to debate space common platform for cross-border cooperation in sciences issues. The ESSC is represented ex officio Europe. in all ESA’s scientific advisory bodies, in ESA’s High- ESF is dedicated to promoting collaboration in level Science Policy Advisory Committee advising scientific research and in funding of research and its Director General, it has members in the EC’s FP7 science policy across Europe.
    [Show full text]