DOCSLIB.ORG

Mars Sample Return Backward Contamination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mars Sample Return Backward Contamination Mars Sample Return backward contamination – Strategic advice and requirements Report from the ESF-ESSC Study Group on MSR Planetary Protection Requirements European Science Foundation (ESF) European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC) The European Science Foundation (ESF) is an The European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC), independent, non-governmental organisation, the established in 1975, grew from the need to give members of which are 72 national funding agencies, European space scientists a voice in the space arena research performing agencies and academies from 30 at a time when successive US space science missions countries. and NASA’s Apollo missions dominated space The strength of ESF lies in its influential membership research. More than 35 years later, the ESSC actively and in its ability to bring together the different domains collaborates with the European Space Agency (ESA), of European science in order to meet the challenges of the European Commission, national space agencies the future. and the ESF Member Organisations. This has made Since its establishment in 1974, ESF, which has its ESSC a reference name in space sciences within headquarters in Strasbourg with offices in Brussels Europe. and Ostend, has assembled a host of organisations The mission of the ESSC today is to provide an that span all disciplines of science, to create a independent forum for scientists to debate space common platform for cross-border cooperation in sciences issues. The ESSC is represented ex officio Europe. in all ESA’s scientific advisory bodies, in ESA’s High- ESF is dedicated to promoting collaboration in level Science Policy Advisory Committee advising scientific research and in funding of research and its Director General, it has members in the EC’s FP7 science policy across Europe. Through its activities space advisory group, and it has observer status in and instruments, ESF has made major contributions to ESA’s Ministerial Council. At the international level, science in a global context. ESF covers the following ESSC maintains strong relationships with the National scientific domains: Humanities, Life, Earth and Research Council’s (NRC) Space Studies Board in the Environmental Sciences, Medical Sciences, Physical US. and Engineering Sciences, Social Sciences, Marine The ESSC is the European Science Foundation’s (ESF) Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering, Nuclear Expert Committee on space sciences and the ESF’s Physics, Polar Sciences, Radio Astronomy, Space interface with the European space community. Sciences. www.esf.org/essc www.esf.org The European Science Foundation hosts six Expert Authors Boards and Committees: Walter Ammann, John Baross, Allan Bennett, • The European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC) Jim Bridges, Joseph Fragola, Armel Kerrest, • The Nuclear Physics European Collaboration Karina Marshall-Bowman, Hervé Raoul, Petra Rettberg, Committee (NuPECC) John Rummel, Mika Salminen, Erko Stackebrandt, • The Marine Board-ESF (MB-ESF) Nicolas Walter • The European Polar Board (EPB) • The Committee on Radio Astronomy Frequencies (CRAF) ESF Support Staff • The Materials Science and Engineering Expert Committee (MatSEEC) Nicolas Walter, Senior Science Officer Karina Marshall-Bowman, Junior Science Officer In the statutory review of the Expert Boards Johanne Martinez-Schmitt, Administrator and Committees conducted in 2011, the Review Panel concluded unanimously that all Boards and Committees provide multidisciplinary scientific Contact services in the European and in some cases global framework that are indispensable for Europe’s Nicolas Walter scientific landscape, and therefore confirmed the need Senior Science Officer for their continuation. Physical, Engineering and Space Sciences Unit The largely autonomous Expert Boards and Tel: +33 (0)3 88 76 71 66 Committees are vitally important to provide in-depth Email: [email protected] and focused scientific expertise, targeted scientific and policy advice, and to initiate strategic developments in areas of research, infrastructure, environment and society in Europe. Cover picture: ISBN: 978-2-918428-67-1 European Space Agency Printing: Ireg – Strasbourg September 2012 Contents Foreword: Mission Statement 3 1. Mars Sample Return Mission and planetary protection – background 5 1.1 Planetary protection regulatory framework 5 1.2 Mars Sample Return Mission concept 6 1.3 Sterilisation: concept, methods and limitations 7 1.4 Summary of advice from past committees 9 2. From remote exploration to returning samples 10 2.1 New missions for new knowledge 10 2.2 The importance of not compromising the sample and the Mars surface 11 2.3 The challenge raised by a returned sample 11 2.4 Considering backward contamination through particle size 12 3. Life as we know it and size limits 14 3.1 Life as we know it 14 3.2 Approaching the issue of minimum size limit for life 14 3.3 Characteristics of the smallest cells 15 3.4 Viruses 17 3.5 Gene transfer agents (GTAs) 18 3.6 From new knowledge to new requirements 19 3.7 Perspectives for the future 21 4. Defining the adequate level of assurance for a non-release 22 4.1 From risk to level of assurance 22 4.2 Approaching the unknown and considering consequences 22 4.3 The Precautionary Principle in the context of MSR 25 4.4 Emission optimisation strategies 25 4.5 Quantitative risk levels used by regulators 27 4.6 Updating the appropriate level of assurance 31 4.7 Potential verification methods 32 5. From release to risk: a framework to approach the consequences 33 5.1 The sequence of events leading to environmental consequences 33 5.2 Estimate of the overall risk 35 5.3 Direct consequences for human health 35 5.4 Being prepared 38 6. Perceived risk: differences between the general public and experts 39 7. Regulatory and legal aspects of a Mars Sample Return Mission 42 7.1 Obligation to prevent pollution/contamination of Outer Space and the Earth 42 7.2 Responsibility and liability of States 43 7.3 The necessity/utility to give some legal value to measures preventing damage 44 8. Study Group findings and recommendations 45 8.1 Mars exploration and sample return 45 8.2 Uncertainties, Precautionary Principle and optimisation 45 8.3 On particle size 46 8.4 Public perception 47 8.5 On the required level of assurance 47 8.6 Implication for design 48 8.7 Accompanying measures 48 References 50 Annex 1: ESF-ESSC Study Group composition 57 Annex 2: Risk perception workshop – participation, consensus statements and recommendations 58 Foreword: Mission Statement l l l As planetary protection regulations have a signifi- The mandate of the Study Group was to: 3 cant impact on mission design, engineering and “Recommend the level of assurance for the exclu- overall cost, it is critical that the guidelines are sion of an unintended release of a potential Mars implemented with proper justification and are re- life form into the Earth’s biosphere for a Mars evaluated on a regular basis. Sample Return mission”. In June 2011, the European Space Agency The starting point of this activity was the asked the European Science Foundation (ESF) in requirement used since the late 1990s specifying coordination with its European Space Sciences that: ‘the probability that a single unsterilised particle Committee (ESSC) to perform a study regarding of 0.2 micron diameter or greater is released into the planetary protection regulations for a Mars Sample Earth environment shall be less than 106’. Return (MSR) mission. Specifically, ESF was asked The value for the maximum particle size was to perform a study on the level of assurance of derived from the NRC-SSB 1999 report ‘Size Limits preventing an unintended release of Martial par- of Very Small Microorganisms: Proceedings of a ticles into the Earth’s biosphere in the frame of an Workshop’, which declared that 0.25 ± 0,05 µm MSR mission. ESF commissioned a study group of was the lower size limit for life as we know it (NRC, 12 high-level, international and multidisciplinary 1999). However, the past decade has shown enor- experts (see Annex 1 for Study Group composi- mous advances in microbiology, and microbes in tion) to evaluate the current requirements, and to the 0.10–0,15 µm range have been discovered in provide new insights and recommendations where various environments. Therefore, the value for the applicable. The Study Group was formed following maximum particle size that could be released into a call for nominations addressed to several research the Earth’s biosphere is revisited and re-evaluated organisations in Europe and beyond as well as to in this report. Also, the current level of assurance the ESF standing committees on Life, Earth and of preventing the release of a Mars particle is recon- Environmental Sciences (LESC), Medical Research sidered. (EMRC), Physical and Engineering Sciences (PESC) To complete its mandate, the Study Group met as well as Social Sciences (SCSS) and Humanities on three occasions between June and November (SCH). 2011 and commissioned the organisation of a work- Mars Sample Return backward contamination – Strategic advice and requirements shop dedicated to risk perception held in January 2012. The outcome and recommendations from the risk perception workshop (see Annex 2 for details) were used as direct inputs in the formulation of the advice contained in this report. 1. Mars Sample Return Mission and planetary protection – background l l l 5 1.1 Planetary protection regulatory policy, while also providing guidelines to spacefar- framework ing nations. Planetary protection considers two
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modelling Panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 System
    October 13, 2017 Modelling panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 system James A. Blake1,2*, David J. Armstrong1,2, Dimitri Veras1,2 Abstract The recent ground-breaking discovery of seven temperate planets within the TRAPPIST-1 system has been hailed as a milestone in the development of exoplanetary science. Centred on an ultra-cool dwarf star, the planets all orbit within a sixth of the distance from Mercury to the Sun. This remarkably compact nature makes the system an ideal testbed for the modelling of rapid lithopanspermia, the idea that micro-organisms can be distributed throughout the Universe via fragments of rock ejected during a meteoric impact event. We perform N-body simulations to investigate the timescale and success-rate of lithopanspermia within TRAPPIST-1. In each simulation, test particles are ejected from one of the three planets thought to lie within the so-called ‘habitable zone’ of the star into a range of allowed orbits, constrained by the ejection velocity and coplanarity of the case in question. The irradiance received by the test particles is tracked throughout the simulation, allowing the overall radiant exposure to be calculated for each one at the close of its journey. A simultaneous in-depth review of space microbiological literature has enabled inferences to be made regarding the potential survivability of lithopanspermia in compact exoplanetary systems. 1Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL 2Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL *Corresponding author: [email protected] Contents Universe, and can propagate from one location to another. This interpretation owes itself predominantly to the works of William 1 Introduction1 Thompson (Lord Kelvin) and Hermann von Helmholtz in the 1.1 Mechanisms for panspermia...............2 latter half of the 19th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-References ASTEROID IMPACT Definition and Introduction History of Impact Cratering Studies
    18 ASTEROID IMPACT Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., and Price, S. D., 2002. The identification and confirmation of impact structures on supplemental IRAS minor planet survey. The Astronomical Earth were developed: (a) crater morphology, (b) geo- 123 – Journal, , 1056 1085. physical anomalies, (c) evidence for shock metamor- Tholen, D. J., and Barucci, M. A., 1989. Asteroid taxonomy. In Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), phism, and (d) the presence of meteorites or geochemical Asteroids II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 298–315. evidence for traces of the meteoritic projectile – of which Yeomans, D., and Baalke, R., 2009. Near Earth Object Program. only (c) and (d) can provide confirming evidence. Remote Available from World Wide Web: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ sensing, including morphological observations, as well programs. as geophysical studies, cannot provide confirming evi- dence – which requires the study of actual rock samples. Cross-references Impacts influenced the geological and biological evolu- tion of our own planet; the best known example is the link Albedo between the 200-km-diameter Chicxulub impact structure Asteroid Impact Asteroid Impact Mitigation in Mexico and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Under- Asteroid Impact Prediction standing impact structures, their formation processes, Torino Scale and their consequences should be of interest not only to Earth and planetary scientists, but also to society in general. ASTEROID IMPACT History of impact cratering studies In the geological sciences, it has only recently been recog- Christian Koeberl nized how important the process of impact cratering is on Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria a planetary scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Nuclear Explosive Device for Planetary Defense Against an Incoming Asteroid
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2019 Exoatmospheric Plowshares: Using a Nuclear Explosive Device for Planetary Defense Against an Incoming Asteroid David A. Koplow Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2197 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3229382 UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs, Spring 2019, Issue 1, 76. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Air and Space Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the National Security Law Commons EXOATMOSPHERIC PLOWSHARES: USING A NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE DEVICE FOR PLANETARY DEFENSE AGAINST AN INCOMING ASTEROID DavidA. Koplow* "They shall bear their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks" Isaiah 2:4 ABSTRACT What should be done if we suddenly discover a large asteroid on a collision course with Earth? The consequences of an impact could be enormous-scientists believe thatsuch a strike 60 million years ago led to the extinction of the dinosaurs, and something ofsimilar magnitude could happen again. Although no such extraterrestrialthreat now looms on the horizon, astronomers concede that they cannot detect all the potentially hazardous * Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. The author gratefully acknowledges the valuable comments from the following experts, colleagues and friends who reviewed prior drafts of this manuscript: Hope M. Babcock, Michael R. Cannon, Pierce Corden, Thomas Graham, Jr., Henry R. Hertzfeld, Edward M.
    [Show full text]
  • View Conducted by Its Standing Review Board (SRB)
    Science Committee Report Dr. Wes Huntress, Chair 1 Science Committee Members Wes Huntress, Chair Byron Tapley, (Vice Chair) University of Texas-Austin, Chair of Earth Science Alan Boss, Carnegie Institution, Chair of Astrophysics Ron Greeley, Arizona State University, Chair of Planetary Science Gene Levy, Rice University , Chair of Planetary Protection Roy Torbert, University of New Hampshire, Chair of Heliophysics Jack Burns, University of Colorado Noel Hinners, Independent Consultant *Judith Lean, Naval Research Laboratory Michael Turner, University of Chicago Charlie Kennel, Chair of Space Studies Board (ex officio member) * = resigned July 16, 2010 2 Agenda • Science Results • Programmatic Status • Findings & Recommendations 3 Unusual Thermosphere Collapse • Deep drop in Thermospheric (50 – 400 km) density • Deeper than expected from solar cycle & CO2 4 Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) unlocking the secrets of Noctilucent Clouds (NLCs) Form 50 miles above surface in polar summer vs ~ 6 miles for “norm79al” clouds. NLCs getting brighter; occurring more often. Why? Linked to global change? AIM NLC Image June 27, 2009 - AIM measured the relationship between cloud properties and temperature - Quantified for the first time, the dramatic response to small changes, 10 deg C, in temperature - T sensitivity critical for study of global change effects on mesosphere Response to Gulf Oil Spill UAVSAR 23 June 2010 MODIS 31 May 2010 ASTER 24 May 2010 Visible Visible/IR false color Satellite instruments: continually monitoring the extent of
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Dynamical Generalizations of the Drake Equation: the Linear and Non-Linear Theories
    6 Dynamical Generalizations of the Drake Equation: The Linear and Non-linear Theories Alexander D. Panov Abstract The Drake equation pertains to the essentially equilibrium situation in a popu- lation of communicative civilizations of the Galaxy, but it does not describe dynamical processes which can occur in it. Both linear and non-linear dynam- ical population analyses are built out and discussed instead of the Drake equa- tion. Keywords: SETI, the Drake equation, linear population analysis, non-linear population analysis. Introduction Communicative civilizations (CCs) are the ones which tend to send messages to other civilizations and are able to receive and analyze messages from other civili- zations. The crucial question of the SETI problem is how far the nearest CC from us is. Its answer depends on the number of CCs existing in the Galaxy at present. Fig. 1 shows how the distance between the Sun and the nearest CC depends on the number of CCs in the Galaxy. The calculation was made by us by the Monte Carlo method with the use of a realistic model of the distribution of stars in the Galaxy (Allen 1973) and the actual location of the Sun in the Galaxy (8.5 kpc from the center of the Galaxy). The best known way to answer the question about the number of CCs is the formula by F. Drake N R f n f f f L C * p e l i c , (Eq. 1) where R∗ is a star-formation rate in the Galaxy averaged with respect to all time of its existence, fp is the part of stars with planet systems, nе is the average number of planets in systems suitable for life, fl is the part of planet on which life did appear, fi is the part of planets on which intelligent forms of life devel- oped, fc is the part of planets on which life reached the communicative phase, L is the average duration of the communicative phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Questioning the Surface of Mars As the 21St Century's Ultimate Pioneering Destination in Space
    Questioning The Surface Of Mars As The 21st Century's Ultimate Pioneering Destination In Space Small Bodies Assessment Group Meeting #13 Washington D.C. 1 July 2015 Questioning Mars As The Ultimate Pioneering Destination In Space Background And Context • Foreseeable human-initiated activity in space can be divided into two categories - Exploring (e.g. Lewis & Clark ca. 1805): survey foreign territory + A major component of NASA's charter + Can be conducted by humans directly or by robots under human control + Virtual human presence is possible via tele-robotics stationed < 100,000 km away + Mars never approaches Earth closer than 56 million km - Pioneering (e.g. Pilgrims ca.1620): put down multi-generation roots in foreign territory + NOT in NASA's charter + MUST be conducted by humans in situ and ultimately return sustained profits + Any examples to date are dubious and Earth-centered (e.g. communication satellites) • Mars is widely accepted as the ultimate 21st century pioneering destination in space - Why would 202,586* adults volunteer in 2013 for a one-way trip to the surface of Mars? - What are potential obstacles to pioneering the surface of Mars? - Might there be more accessible and hospitable pioneering destinations than Mars? * The number of applications actually completed and submitted to Mars One was reported in 2015 to be 4227. Daniel R. Adamo ([email protected]) 1 1 July 2015 Questioning Mars As The Ultimate Pioneering Destination In Space History† Indicates Humans Pioneer For Compelling Reasons • Escape from war, starvation,
    [Show full text]
  • Cometary Panspermia a Radical Theory of Life’S Cosmic Origin and Evolution …And Over 450 Articles, ~ 60 in Nature
    35 books: Cosmic origins of life 1976-2020 Physical Sciences︱ Chandra Wickramasinghe Cometary panspermia A radical theory of life’s cosmic origin and evolution …And over 450 articles, ~ 60 in Nature he combined efforts of generations supporting panspermia continues to Prof Wickramasinghe argues that the seeds of all life (bacteria and viruses) Panspermia has been around may have arrived on Earth from space, and may indeed still be raining down some 100 years since the term of experts in multiple fields, accumulate (Wickramasinghe et al., 2018, to affect life on Earth today, a concept known as cometary panspermia. ‘primordial soup’, referring to Tincluding evolutionary biology, 2019; Steele et al., 2018). the primitive ocean of organic paleontology and geology, have painted material not-yet-assembled a fairly good, if far-from-complete, picture COMETARY PANSPERMIA – cultural conceptions of life dating back galactic wanderers are normal features have argued that these could not into living organisms, was first of how the first life on Earth progressed A SOLUTION? to the ideas of Aristotle, and that this of the cosmos. Comets are known to have been lofted from the Earth to a coined. The question of how from simple organisms to what we can The word ‘panspermia’ comes from the may be the source of some of the have significant water content as well height of 400km by any known process. life’s molecular building blocks see today. However, there is a crucial ancient Greek roots ‘sperma’ meaning more hostile resistance the idea of as organics, and their cores, kept warm Bacteria have also been found high in spontaneously assembled gap in mainstream understanding - seed, and ‘pan’, meaning all.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Protection Requirements for Human and Robotic Missions to Mars
    Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration (2012) 4331.pdf PLANETARY PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HUMAN AND ROBOTIC MISSIONS TO MARS. R. Mogul1, P. D. Stabekis2, M. S. Race3, and C. A. Conley4, 1California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 ([email protected]), 2Genex Systems, 525 School St. SW, Suite 201, Washington D.C. 20224 ([email protected]), 3SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, 4NASA Head- quarters, Washington D.C. 20546 ([email protected]) Introduction: Ensuring the scientific integrity of mission. Hardware involved in the acquisition and Mars exploration, and protecting the Earth and the storage of samples from Mars must be designed to human population from potential biohazards, requires protect Mars material from Earth contamination, and the incorporation of planetary protection into human ensure appropriate cleanliness from before launch spaceflight missions as well as robotic precursors. All through return to Earth. Technologies needed to ensure missions returning samples from Mars are required to sample cleanliness at levels similar to those maintained comply with stringent planetary protection require- by the Viking project, in the context of modern space- ments for this purpose, recent refinements to which are craft materials, are yet to be developed. reported here. The objectives of planetary protection policy are As indicated in NASA Policy Directive NPD the same for both human and robotic missions; howev- 8020.7G (section 5c), to ensure compliance with the er, the specific implementation requirements will nec- Outer Space Treaty planetary protection is a mandatory essarily be different. Human missions will require component for all solar system exploration, including additional planetary protection approaches that mini- human missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Crater Gradation in Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum, Mars J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, E02S08, doi:10.1029/2005JE002465, 2006 Crater gradation in Gusev crater and Meridiani Planum, Mars J. A. Grant,1 R. E. Arvidson,2 L. S. Crumpler,3 M. P. Golombek,4 B. Hahn,5 A. F. C. Haldemann,4 R. Li,6 L. A. Soderblom,7 S. W. Squyres,8 S. P. Wright,9 and W. A. Watters10 Received 19 April 2005; revised 21 June 2005; accepted 27 June 2005; published 6 January 2006. [1] The Mars Exploration Rovers investigated numerous craters in Gusev crater and Meridiani Planum during the first 400 sols of their missions. Craters vary in size and preservation state but are mostly due to secondary impacts at Gusev and primary impacts at Meridiani. Craters at both locations are modified primarily by eolian erosion and infilling and lack evidence for modification by aqueous processes. Effects of gradation on crater form are dependent on size, local lithology, slopes, and availability of mobile sediments. At Gusev, impacts into basaltic rubble create shallow craters and ejecta composed of resistant rocks. Ejecta initially experience eolian stripping, which becomes weathering-limited as lags develop on ejecta surfaces and sediments are trapped within craters. Subsequent eolian gradation depends on the slow production of fines by weathering and impacts and is accompanied by minor mass wasting. At Meridiani the sulfate-rich bedrock is more susceptible to eolian erosion, and exposed crater rims, walls, and ejecta are eroded, while lower interiors and low-relief surfaces are increasingly infilled and buried by mostly basaltic sediments. Eolian processes outpace early mass wasting, often produce meters of erosion, and mantle some surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANETARY PROTECTION and REGULATING HUMAN HEALTH: a RISK THAT IS NOT ZERO Victoria Sutton1
    (3) FINAL MACRO VERSION - VICTORIA SUTTON ARTICLE (PP. 71-102) (DO NOT DELETE) 3/9/2020 9:40 AM 19 Hous. J. Health L. & Policy 71 Copyright © 2019 Victoria Sutton Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy PLANETARY PROTECTION AND REGULATING HUMAN HEALTH: A RISK THAT IS NOT ZERO Victoria Sutton1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 73 I. LESSONS FROM HUMAN HISTORY ........................................................... 75 II. U.S. LEADERSHIP, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND GUIDELINES FOR BACK CONTAMINATION—A SHORT HISTORY OF PLANETARY PROTECTION AND BIOCONTAINMENT ................................................... 79 A. International Law and Biocontainment Binding All Nations .......................................................................................... 82 B. Private Space Travel Must Comply with Planetary Protection ...................................................................................... 84 C. Enforceability is a Weakness ......................................................... 85 III. POLICY INDICATIONS THAT A RENEWED FOCUS IS NEEDED FOR BACK CONTAMINATION ........................................................................ 86 A. The Elimination of Human Health and Quarantine from U.S. Planetary Protection Protocols ........................................... 86 1 Victoria Sutton, MPA, PhD, JD, is the Paul Whitfield Horn Professor at Texas Tech University School of Law. Dr. Sutton is the former Assistant Director at the White House Science Office
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Evolution Theory of Life's Origins the Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 13 – P.2/20 Organics
    Chemical Evolution Theory of Life's Origins 1. the synthesis and accumulation of small organic molecules, or monomers, such as amino acids and nucleotides. • Production of glycine (an amino acid) energy 3HCN+2H2O −→ C2H5O2N+CN2H2. • Production of adenine (a base): 5 HCN → C5H5N5, • Production of ribose (a sugar): 5H2CO → C5H10O5. 2. the joining of these monomers into polymers, including proteins and nucleic acids. Bernal showed that clay-like materials could serve as sites for polymerization. 3. the concentration of these molecules into droplets, called protobionts, that had chemical characteristics different from their surroundings. This relies heavily on the formation of a semi-permeable membrane, one that allows only certain materials to flow one way or the other through it. Droplet formation requires a liquid with a large surface tension, such as water. Membrane formation naturally occurs if phospholipids are present. 4. The origin of heredity, or a means of relatively error-free reproduction. It is widely, but not universally, believed that RNA-like molecules were the first self-replicators — the RNA world hypothesis. They may have been preceded by inorganic self-replicators. Lattimer, AST 248, Lecture 13 – p.1/20 Acquisition of Organic Material and Water • In the standard model of the formatio of the solar system, volatile materials are concentrated in the outer solar system. Although there is as much carbon as nearly all other heavy elements combined in the Sun and the bulk of the solar nebula, the high temperatures in the inner solar system have lead to fractional amounts of C of 10−3 of the average.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Defence Activities Beyond NASA and ESA
    Planetary Defence Activities Beyond NASA and ESA Brent W. Barbee 1. Introduction The collision of a significant asteroid or comet with Earth represents a singular natural disaster for a myriad of reasons, including: its extraterrestrial origin; the fact that it is perhaps the only natural disaster that is preventable in many cases, given sufficient preparation and warning; its scope, which ranges from damaging a city to an extinction-level event; and the duality of asteroids and comets themselves---they are grave potential threats, but are also tantalising scientific clues to our ancient past and resources with which we may one day build a prosperous spacefaring future. Accordingly, the problems of developing the means to interact with asteroids and comets for purposes of defence, scientific study, exploration, and resource utilisation have grown in importance over the past several decades. Since the 1980s, more and more asteroids and comets (especially the former) have been discovered, radically changing our picture of the solar system. At the beginning of the year 1980, approximately 9,000 asteroids were known to exist. By the beginning of 2001, that number had risen to approximately 125,000 thanks to the Earth-based telescopic survey efforts of the era, particularly the emergence of modern automated telescopic search systems, pioneered by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT’s) LINEAR system in the mid-to-late 1990s.1 Today, in late 2019, about 840,000 asteroids have been discovered,2 with more and more being found every week, month, and year. Of those, approximately 21,400 are categorised as near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), 2,000 of which are categorised as Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs)3 and 2,749 of which are categorised as potentially accessible.4 The hazards posed to us by asteroids affect people everywhere around the world.
    [Show full text]