DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Proposal Community Consultation Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Proposal Community Consultation Version Planning Proposal Amendments to the Sydney LEP 2012 Sydney Metro Martin Place Station Precinct Submitted to Department of Planning and Environment On behalf of Macquarie Corporate Holdings Pty Limited 27 October 2017 | 15879 Community Consultation Version FORMERLY KNOWN AS JBA CONTACT Alexis Cella Director [email protected] (02) 9956 6962 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of ACN 615 087 931 Pty Ltd. This document has been prepared by: This document has been reviewed by: Chris Ferreira Alexis Cella Julie Bindon 27 October 2017 27 October 2017 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. Ethos Urban operates under a Quality Management System. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with that system. If the report is not signed below, it is a preliminary draft. VERSION NO. 4 DATE OF ISSUE: 27.10.17 REVISION BY: CFE APPROVED BY: JB Ethos Urban ACN 615 087 931 Pty Ltd. www.ethosurban.com 173 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 t 61 2 9956 6952 Ethos Urban Contents 1.0 Introduction 8 1.1 Background 10 1.2 Macquarie Project Objectives 12 1.3 Related Applications 13 1.4 Gateway Determination 14 2.0 Site Context and Description 18 2.1 Location 18 2.2 Site Description 20 2.3 Surrounding Development 29 2.4 Topography 38 2.5 Heritage Context 39 3.0 Key Current Planning Controls 41 3.1 Sydney Local Environment Plan 2012 41 3.2 Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 46 3.3 LEP and DCP Compliant Scheme 48 4.0 Part 1 – Objectives and Intended Outcomes of the Planning Proposal 51 4.1 Strategic Context 51 4.2 Objectives 51 4.3 Intended Outcomes 51 5.0 Part 2 – Explanation of Amending LEP Provisions 53 5.1 Outline of LEP Changes 53 5.2 Height (Mapping Amendment) 53 5.3 Height and Floor Space – Site Specific Provision 55 5.4 Amendments to SDCP 2012 58 6.0 Part 3 – Justification 59 6.1 Section A- Need for a Planning Proposal 59 6.2 Section B – Relationship to Strategic Planning Framework 60 6.3 Section C – Environmental, Social and Economic Impact 95 6.4 Section D – State and Commonwealth Interests 95 Ethos Urban | 15879 1 Contents 7.0 Environmental Assessment 97 7.1 Built Form and Urban Design 97 7.2 Suitability of Increased Precinct Capacity / Density 110 7.3 Design Excellence 113 7.4 Overshadowing and Solar Access 118 7.5 Visual Analysis 121 7.6 Wind Assessment 127 7.7 Sky View (Daylight) Analysis 128 7.8 Heritage 130 7.9 Commercial Office Design Requirements 131 7.10 Transport, Traffic and Parking 132 7.11 Airport Operations 133 7.12 Sustainability 134 7.13 Social and Economic Effects 134 7.14 The Public Interest 135 8.0 Part 4 – Mapping 137 9.0 Part 5 – Community Consultation 138 10.0 Part 6 – Indicative Project Timeline 139 11.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 140 Figures Figure 1 – Site Plan 8 Figure 2 – The route of Sydney Metro Stages 1 and 2 10 Figure 3 – Relationship of key planning applications 14 Figure 4 – Context plan of the Precinct 18 Figure 5 – Location plan of the Precinct 19 Figure 6 – Aerial plan of the Precinct 19 Figure 7 – 50 Martin Place as viewed from Martin Place and Elizabeth Street 21 Figure 8 – 50 Martin Place as viewed from Martin Place and Castlereagh Street 22 Figure 9 – 9-19 Elizabeth Street, as viewed from Elizabeth Street 23 Figure 10 – 9-19 Elizabeth Street (highlighted in red) with adjoining development 23 Figure 11 – 7 Elizabeth Street (highlighted in red), as viewed from Elizabeth Street 24 Ethos Urban | 15879 2 Contents Figure 12 – 5 Elizabeth Street (highlighted in red), as viewed from Elizabeth Street 25 Figure 13 – 5 Elizabeth Street (highlighted in red), as viewed from Castlereagh Street 25 Figure 14 – 55 Hunter Street, as viewed from the corner of Hunter and Phillip Street, looking south-west 26 Figure 15 – 55 Hunter Street, as viewed from the corner of Hunter and Bligh Street, looking south-east 26 Figure 16 – 8-12 Castlereagh Street, as viewed from Castlereagh Street 27 Figure 17 – 34-49 Martin Place, as viewed from the corner of Martin Place and Elizabeth Street 28 Figure 18 – 39-49 Martin Place, as viewed from Martin Place 28 Figure 19 – Surrounding development map 29 Figure 20 – Martin Place looking west 30 Figure 21 – Martin Place looking east 31 Figure 22 – Entry into Martin Place Shopping Circle and Railway Station outside 50 Martin Place 31 Figure 23 – 1 Chifley Square, as viewed from the corner of Hunter and Phillip Street 32 Figure 24 – Chifley Tower, as viewed from the corner of Hunter and Elizabeth Streets 32 Figure 25 – 60-66 Hunter Street 33 Figure 26 – Richard Johnson Square and 37 Bligh Street, as viewed from Bligh Street 33 Figure 27 – 52 Martin Place, as viewed from Martin Place 34 Figure 28 – 8-12 Chifley Square, as viewed from the corner of Hunter and Chifley Square 34 Figure 29 – 53-63 Martin Place, as viewed from Martin Place 34 Figure 30 – 60 Castlereagh Street, as viewed from Elizabeth Street 35 Figure 31 – the South Site building adjoining to 60 Castlereagh Street 35 Figure 32 – 60-70 Elizabeth Street, as viewed from Elizabeth Street 36 Figure 33 – MLC Centre building, as viewed from Martin Place 36 Figure 34 – 38-46 Martin Place, as viewed from Martin Place 37 Ethos Urban | 15879 3 Contents Figure 35 – 17 Castlereagh Street, as viewed from Castlereagh Street 37 Figure 36 – 15 Castlereagh Street, as viewed from Castlereagh Street 37 Figure 37 – 9 Castlereagh Street, as viewed from Castlereagh Street 37 Figure 38 – 1-7 Castlereagh Street, as viewed from Hunter Street 38 Figure 39 – Key heritage items surrounding the site 40 Figure 40 – Zoning map 41 Figure 41 – Sydney LEP 2012 Height of Building Map Extract 42 Figure 42 – Illustration of the South Site potential tower form if planning controls retained 44 Figure 43 – Sydney LEP 2012 Floor Space Ratio Map Extract 45 Figure 44 – North Site LEP and DCP compliant envelope ‘A’* 50 Figure 45 – North Site + 50 Martin Place LEP and DCP compliant envelope ‘B’** 50 Figure 46 – South Site LEP and DCP compliant envelope 50 Figure 47 – Proposed amended height of buildings map (sheet 14) 54 Figure 48 – Outcome of the proposed maximum building height control 55 Figure 49 – Key infrastructure projects and their committed delivery timeframe, as identified in the Premier’s Priorities 61 Figure 50 – A Hierarchy of Plans 62 Figure 51 – Central Subregion map 65 Figure 52 – Extract of the metropolitan and strategic centres map 68 Figure 53 – Greater Sydney transport corridors across each of the three cities 72 Figure 54 – Population, employment, and dwellings growth 74 Figure 55 – Central Sydney Planning Strategy Context 77 Figure 56 – Strategic Density Areas / Tower Clusters 78 Figure 57 – 3D representation of additional height capacity of Central Sydney 79 Figure 58 – Extract from B_12, Site Identification, Appendix B of the CSPS 80 Figure 59 – Employment and transport capacity growth 81 Ethos Urban | 15879 4 Contents Figure 60 – Integrated land use and transport Precinct 90 Figure 61 – Proposed built form context 98 Figure 62 – Martin Place setback study 100 Figure 63 – Site specific building envelope developed for 60 Martin Place 100 Figure 64 – Recess to articulate podium structure and tower to retain street definition of Martin Place 102 Figure 65 – Transition of different historic street geometries 103 Figure 66 - Existing and projected uses of public space within Martin Place 109 Figure 67 – Built form capacity site identification map 111 Figure 68 – Location of recent and proximate developments with site specific controls varying from general Sydney LEP and/or DCP requirements 115 Figure 69 – Aerial view of Chifley Square showing key building alignments for the Martin Place Metro Precinct 116 Figure 70 – Elizabeth (top) and Castlereagh (bottom) street wall noting built form threshold to Martin Place 117 Figure 71 – Hyde Park and Martin Place Sun Access Planes 118 Figure 72 – 148-160 King Street approved Hyde Park shadow impacts – 1:00pm 120 Figure 73 – View of proposed illustrative scheme from Chifley Square, looking south down Elizabeth Street and Hunter Street 123 Figure 74 – View of proposed illustrative scheme from Richard Johnson Square looking south down Castlereagh Street 123 Figure 75 – View of proposed illustrative scheme east along Martin Place 124 Figure 76 – View of proposed illustrative scheme west along Martin Place 124 Figure 77 – Extract of key public views map 125 Figure 78 – Martin Place western sky protected view 126 Figure 79 – GPO Clock Tower protected view 126 Figure 80 – Sydney Hospital protected view 126 Figure 81 – Wind model extent 127 Figure 82 – Existing and proposed tower footprint study 132 Ethos Urban | 15879 5 Contents Figure 83 – Illustration of an integrated transport and employment outcome at Martin Place 136 Figure 84 – Proposed height of buildings map (sheet 14) 137 Tables Table 1 – Gateway conditions and response 15 Table 2 – Legal description and ownership 20 Table 3 – Heritage items on and within the Precinct 39 Table 4 – Proposed concept built form statistics 52 Table 5 – Existing and proposed site-specific height LEP controls 56 Table 6 – Existing and proposed site specific FSR controls 56 Table 7 – Applicable State Environmental Planning Policies 84 Table 8 – Assessment against Section 117 Ministerial Directions 86 Table 9 – Consistency with the aims of the Sydney LEP 2012 91 Table 10 – Consistency with the building height objectives 92 Table 11 – Consistency with the FSR objectives 93 Table 12 – Findings of Tzannes Urban Design and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sydney Metro Martin Place Integrated Station Development Heritage Interpretation Strategy Macquarie, February 2019 THIS REPORT
    Sydney Metro Martin Place Integrated Station Development Heritage Interpretation Strategy Prepared for Macquarie Corporate Holdings Pty Ltd February 2019 • Issue P5 Project number 19 0009 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 Brisbane Level 14, 241 Adelaide Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160 Principals Alex Kibble, Robert Denton, Megan Jones, John Rose | Practice Directors George Phillips, Jocelyn Jackson, Melanie Mackenzie Senior Associates Ian Burgher, Angelo Casado, David Earp, Emma Lee, Scott MacArthur, Renata Ratcliffe, Lachlan Rowe, Anna Harris Associates Paul Dyson, Sean Williams NSW Nominated Architects Robert Denton Registration No 5782 | Alex Kibble Registration No 6015 Sydney Metro Martin Place Integrated Station Development • Heritage Interpretation Strategy CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the report 1 1.2 Previous Heritage Interpretation Strategies and Reports 3 1.3 Methodology and approach 3 1.4 Site location and description 6 1.5 Purpose of the Heritage Interpretation Strategy 8 1.6 Scope of the Heritage Interpretation Strategy 9 1.7 Author identification 9 1.8 Project Team 9 1.9 Definitions 10 2 Historical Background 12 2.1 The North Site 12 2.2 Former Government Savings Bank of NSW, 50 Martin Place 14 2.3 Martin Place 16 2.4 The South Site, 39
    [Show full text]
  • Built Pedagogy
    Above any other faculty, the very fabric of the New Building Built for the Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning must Pedagogy function as an experiential resource for research, teaching and knowledge transfer. This presents a rare opportunity for profound, intrinsic and meaningful links between building programme and architectural expression Cultural resources can engage communities in collective experiences, providing opportunities for reflection and conversation on the never-ending questions of how we make our lives meaningful, our work valuable and our values workable. 05.1.1 Growing Esteem, 2005 The Gallery Building reinforces the horizontal lines in the landscape and respects, engages with and reinforces the character of the Collections and Research Building Urban Design Exemplar Precinct established by the High Court and the National Gallery of Australia; Australian Museum, Sydney Integration with Environment Seeking to learn about sustainable build- ing through study of the natural world, Enduring, High Quality, Timeless the double skin façade is a collaboration Distinctive Materials and Detailing with the Museums scientists - a visible, intrinsic and poetic link between architec- National Portrait Gallery tural expression and the institution’s iden- Canberra, Australia tity. Nature’s golden ratio and the filigree of a moth’s wing scale, seen through a Won in open international scanning electron microscope, inspire the competition and completed in glazing pattern. Innovative inventive use 2008, the National Portrait Gallery of dichroic glass and advanced concealed is the most significant new national edgelighting produces dynamic colours institution in the Parliamentary through optical interference as do irides- Triangle for almost 20 years. cent butterflies. Canberra - City and Environs, Griffin Legacy Framework Plan, NCA, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • From Track to Tarmac
    Federation Faces and Introduction A guided walk around the streets and laneways Places of North Sydney focusing on our Federation connections, including the former residences of A walking tour of Federation Sir Joseph Palmer Abbott, Sir Edmund Barton faces and places in North and Dugald Thomson. Along the walk, view the Sydney changes in the North Sydney landscape since th Federation and the turn of the 20 century. Distance: 6 Km Approximate time: 4 hours At the turn of the year 1900 to 1901 the city of Grading: medium to high Sydney went mad with joy. For a few days hope ran so high that poets and prophets declared Australia to be on the threshold of a golden age… from early morning on the first of January 1901 trams, trains and ferry boats carried thousands of people into the city for the greatest day of their history: the inauguration of the Commonwealth of Australia. It was to be a people‟s festival. Manning Clark, Historian It was also a people‟s movement and 1901 was the culmination of many years of discussions, community activism, heated public debates, vibrant speeches and consolidated actions. In 1890 the Australasian Federal Conference was held in Melbourne and the following year in Sydney. In 1893 a meeting of the various federation groups, including the Australian Native Association was held at Corowa. A plan was developed for the election of delegates to a convention. In the mid to late 1890s it was very much a peoples‟ movement gathering groundswell support. In 1896 a People‟s Convention with 220 delegates and invited guests from all of the colonies took place at Bathurst - an important link in the Federation chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbour Bridge to South Head and Clovelly
    To NEWCASTLE BARRENJOEY A Harbour and Coastal Walk Personal Care This magnificent walk follows the south-east shoreline of Sydney Harbour The walk requires average fitness. Take care as it includes a variety of before turning southwards along ocean beaches and cliffs. It is part of one pathway conditions and terrain including hills and steps. Use sunscreen, of the great urban coast walks of the world, connecting Broken Bay in carry water and wear a hat and good walking shoes. Please observe official SYDNEY HARBOUR Sydney's north to Port Hacking to its south (see Trunk Route diagram), safety and track signs at all times. traversing the rugged headlands and sweeping beaches, bush, lagoons, bays, and harbours of coastal Sydney. Public Transport The walk covered in this map begins at the Circular Quay connection with Public transport is readily available at regular points along the way Harbour Bridge the Harbour Circle Walk and runs to just past coastal Bronte where it joins (see map). This allows considerable flexibility in entering and exiting the Approximate Walking Times in Hours and Minutes another of the series of maps covering this great coastal and harbour route. routes. Note - not all services operate every day. to South Head e.g. 1 hour 45 minutes = 1hr 45 The main 29 km Harbour Bridge (B3) to South Head (H1) and to Clovelly Bus, train and ferry timetables. G8) walk (marked in red on the map) is mostly easy but fascinating walk- Infoline Tel: 131-500 www.131500.com.au 0 8 ing. Cutting a 7km diagonal across the route between Rushcutters Bay (C5) and Clovelly kilometres and Clovelly, is part of the Federation Track (also marked in red) which, in Short Walks using Public Transport Brochure 1 To Manly NARRABEEN full, runs from Queensland to South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    Attachment A Report Prepared by External Planning Consultant 3 Recommendation It is resolved that consent be granted to Development Application D/2017/1652, subject to the following: (A) the variation sought to Clause 6.19 Overshadowing of certain public places in accordance with Clause 4.6 'Exceptions to development standards' of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 be supported in this instance; and (B) the requirement under Clause 6.21 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 requiring a competitive design process be waived in this instance; and (C) the requirement under Clause 7.20 of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 requiring the preparation of a development control plan be waived in this instance; Reasons for Recommendation The reasons for the recommendation are as follows: (A) The proposal, subject to recommended conditions, is consistent with the objectives of the planning controls for the site and is compatible with the character of the area into which it will be inserted. It will provide a new unique element in the public domain which has been specifically designed to highlight Sydney’s main boulevard and the important civic precinct of Town Hall and the Queen Victoria Building. (B) The proposed artwork is permissible on the subject land and complies with all relevant planning controls with the exception of overshadowing of Sydney Town Hall steps. While the proposal will result in some additional shadowing of the steps this impact will be minor and is outweighed by the positive impacts of the proposal. (C) The proposal is of a nature compatible with the overall function of the locality as a civic precinct in the heart of the Sydney CBD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment
    ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Molonglo Stage 3 132KV Transmission Line Relocation FINAL March 2019 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Molonglo Stage 3 132KV Transmission Line Relocation FINAL Prepared by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited on behalf of Calibre Consulting (ACT) Project Director: Karina Carwardine Project Manager: Amanda Mulherin Technical Director: David Moore Report No. 8139B_R02_V2 Date: March 2019 Canberra PO Box 6135 2/99 Northbourne Avenue Turner ACT 2612 Ph. 1300 793 267 www.umwelt.com.au This report was prepared using Umwelt’s ISO 9001 certified Quality Management System. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the sole use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd (Umwelt). No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of Umwelt. Umwelt undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. Umwelt assumes no liability to a third party for any inaccuracies in or omissions to that information. Where this document indicates that information has been provided by third parties, Umwelt has made no independent verification of this information except as expressly stated. ©Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd Document Status Rev No. Reviewer Approved for Issue Name Date Name Date FINAL Karina Carwardine 14 March 2019 Karina Carwardine 14 March 2019 ecological assessment Introduction 8139b_R02_V2.docx 4 Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016-17 Delivering Sustainable and World-Leading Public Parklands About Centennial Centennial Parklands 5 the Hon
    Centennial Parklands Annual Report 2016-17 Delivering sustainable and world-leading public parklands About Centennial Centennial Parklands 5 The Hon. Gabrielle Upton MP Acknowledgement of Parklands Chairman’s report 6 Traditional Owners 04 Executive Director’s report 7 The Hon. Gabrielle Upton MP We acknowledge the Gadigal clan as the Highlights for 2016-2017 8-9 Minister for Environment, traditional custodians of the country on which Botanic Gardens & Minister for Local Government Centennial Parklands has been constructed. and Minister for Heritage Centennial Parklands Strategic Plan 10 52 Martin Place SYDNEY NSW 2000 Statement of Record 24 October 2017 Managing Resources for Sustainability 13 This Annual Report for 2016-17 complies with the Environmental Annual Reporting requirements for NSW Government, Performance Managing our Environment 14 Dear Minister, and contains the Centennial Park and Moore Park 12 Planning and development issues 15 Trust’s performance against the strategies of the In accordance with the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Centennial Parklands Plan of Management 2015-20. Sustainable Parklands Program 15 Act 1984, the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 and the Regulations under those Acts, we have pleasure in submitting the Annual Report for 2016-17 of the Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust. Social Visitation 17 16 Performance Sports in the Parklands 18 Education and community programs 19 Volunteering 19 Venue management 20 Tony Ryan Adam Boyton Community Consultative Committee 21 Chairman Trustee Financial Fees and charges 23 22 Performance Economic performance 24 Payment performance 24 Accounts payable 24 Investment performance 25 Financial Statement by Members of the Trust 27 26 Statements Independent Audit Report 28 Statement of Comprehensive Income 30 Statement of Financial Position 31 Statement of Changes in Equity 32 Statement of Cash Flows 33 Appendices Governance and organisational matters 59 58 The Trustees 60 Risk management 62 Organisational Matters 65 The Executive team 66 Did you know..
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Place Event Guidelines Contents
    Martin Place Event Guidelines Martin Place Mall Event Guidelines April 2020 Martin Place Event Guidelines Contents Introduction 3 1. Planning Events in Martin Place 4 2. Application and Approval Process 11 3. Further Details and Contacts 15 2 Martin Place Event Guidelines Introduction This Martin Place Event Guidelines document is designed to assist applicants with detailing the regulations and procedures associated with staging events in Martin Place and gaining approvals from the City of Sydney for such events. From here on the City of Sydney will be referenced as ‘the City’ for the purpose of this document. This document provides an outline of the process required to take your event enquiry from application to approval for Martin Place and should be read in conjunction with the City’s overarching Event Guidelines document and other planning provision documents where applicable. Responsibility as an Event Owner An event organiser is defined as a legal entity responsible for the event, that is, the entity who has taken out and possesses public liability insurance covering the event and all associated activities (extending to any contracted services with third parties) and the stated applicant detailed on the Event Application submitted to the City. Legal liability and responsibilities are not diminished if the event is a community or not-for-profit event. The event organiser may or may not also be an employer. An employer has specific duties and responsibilities under Work Health and Safety legislation. All event organisers have a duty of care to provide a safe event for patrons as well as staff employed to produce the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Metro Martin Place Integrated Station Development South Tower Stage 2 DA Architectural Design Report
    Sydney Metro Martin Place Integrated Station Development South Tower Stage 2 DA Architectural Design Report CSWSMP-MAC-SMA-AT-DRE-000110 [F] Prepared for Macquarie Corporate Holdings Pty Limited September 2018 2 View looking west along Martin Place. The proposed 39 Martin Place is on the left. Street trees, furniture and other public domain elements within the precinct are indicative only and are subject to relevant approvals and detailed coordination with new and existing underground utilities and infrastructure. Table of Contents 3 Contents Part 01 Project Overview 5 Part 02 Site Context 13 Part 03 Design Principles Summary 31 Part 04 Urban Design and Architecture 35 Part 05 Public Domain & Ground Plane 67 Part 06 Tower Functionality 73 Part 07 Appendices 79 Appendix A Architectural Drawings Appendix B Demarcation Drawings Appendix C Gross Floor Area Schedule Appendix D Consolidated Design Guidelines Project Overview 01 6 Project Overview South Site Introduction This report supports a State Significant Development (SSD) Development Application (DA) (SSD DA) submitted to the Minister for Planning (Minister) pursuant to Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) on behalf of Macquarie Corporate Holdings Pty Limited (Macquarie), who is seeking to create a world class transport and employment precinct at Martin Place, Sydney. The SSD DA seeks approval for the detailed design and construction of the South Site Over Station Development (OSD), located above and integrated with Metro Martin Place station (part of the NSW Government’s approved Sydney Metro project). The southern entrance to Metro Martin Place station and the South Site OSD above are located at 39-49 Martin Place.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Accredited Chest Clinics (By State)
    ACT Health Clinical Placement Office 2016 List of Accredited Chest clinics (By State) ACT Canberra Hospital TB Services Department of Contact: 02 6244 2066/ 02 6244 2702 Thoracic Medicine The Canberra Hospital PO Box 11 Woden ACT 2606 New South Wales Central Coast Local Health District Gosford Hospital Contact: TB Prevention & Control Service (Chest Clinic) Appt: 4320 3388 PO Box 361 Gosford NSW 2250 Only Mon 8.30-3; Tues & Fri 8.30-4 Illawarra and Shoalhaven LHD The Wollongong Hospital Contact: 4253 4138 Department of Respiratory Medicine Crown Street Wollongong NSW 2500 Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District Nepean Hospital Contact: 4734 2536 Chest Clinic Outpatients Department PO Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Northern Sydney Local Health District Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital Contact: 9477 9318 Palmerston Road Hornsby NSW 2077 New Royal North Shore Hospital Contact: 9926 7905 Chest Clinic Level 8, Dept. of Respiratory Medicine St Leonards NSW 2065 Manly District Hospital Contact: 9976 9542 Chest Clinic Manly NSW 2095 South Eastern Sydney LHD - Northern Network Prince of Wales Hospital Contact: 9382 4643/ 9382 4672 Department of Respiratory Medicine Level 2 Dickinson Building Barker Street Randwick NSW 2031 Sydney Hospital Contact: 9382 7535 Chest Clinic Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000 St. Vincent's Hospital Contact: 8382 3150 Heart-Lung Ambulatory Care Level 4, Xavier Building 390 Victoria Street Darlinghurst NSW 2010 South Eastern Sydney LHD - Central Network ACT Health Clinical Placement Office 2016 St George Hospital Contact: 9113
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Assessment Report
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Canberra Brickworks Access Road and Dudley Street Upgrade Area, Yarralumla, ACT FINAL May 2018 IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Canberra Brickworks Access Road and Dudley Street Upgrade Area, Yarralumla, ACT FINAL Prepared by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited on behalf of Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorate Project Director: Naomi Buchhorn Project Manager: Amanda Mulherin Report No. 8112_R02_Final Date: May 2018 Canberra PO Box 6135 56 Bluebell Street O’Connor ACT 2602 Ph. 02 6262 9484 www.umwelt.com.au This report was prepared using Umwelt’s ISO 9001 certified Quality Management System. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the sole use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd (Umwelt). No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of Umwelt. Umwelt undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. Umwelt assumes no liability to a third party for any inaccuracies in or omissions to that information. Where this document indicates that information has been provided by third parties, Umwelt has made no independent verification of this information except as expressly stated. ©Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd Document Status Rev No. Reviewer Approved for Issue Name Date Name Date Final Naomi Buchhorn 19/09/2017 Naomi Buchhorn 19/09/2017 Final 2 Naomi Buchhorn
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
    Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square.
    [Show full text]