The Magic Bullet: a Legal-Scientific Analysis of the Warren Commission’S Single Bullet Theory Andrew M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Magic Bullet: a Legal-Scientific Analysis of the Warren Commission’S Single Bullet Theory Andrew M The Magic Bullet: A Legal-Scientific analysis of the Warren Commission’s Single Bullet Theory Andrew M. Mason1 Since its publication in 1964, the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy 2 has been mired in controversy. In reaching its conclusion that President Kennedy was the victim of a lone assassin, the Warren Commission adopted the “single bullet theory” to explain the sequence of three shots directed at the President’s limousine. Three of the seven Commission members apparently disagreed with the theory on the grounds that the evidence did not support it. The lack of clear evidence for the theory and its inconsistency with key eyewitness testimony has provided fertile ground for conspiracy theorists who allege that the explanation was concocted to support the Commission’s conclusion that all shots were fired from Oswald’s rifle.3 According to the single bullet theory, a one-inch long, copper jacketed, lead core 6.5 millimeter rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck, Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. In doing so, the bullet traversed 19 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a tie knot, removed 4 inches of rib and shattered a radius bone. Despite leaving several small particles of lead behind in the Governor’s wounds, the missile emerged from its tortuous journey remarkably unscathed. The bullet that is supposed to have done all this damage was found on Governor Connally’s stretcher in the corridor at the Parkland Hospital in Dallas. It became a key Commission exhibit, identified as CE399. It resembled a pristine bullet with its copper jacket completely intact. The bullet’s nose appeared normal but the tail was compressed laterally on one side. It weighed 158.6 grains, or about 2.2 grains less than the average weight of an unfired bullet.4 Despite much criticism of the single bullet theory, no one has been able to offer another explanation that is consistent with the Commission’s conclusion that all shots were fired from the same gun. It is not surprising, therefore, that the single bullet theory has been staunchly defended by those who believe the Warren Commission’s finding was correct and roundly criticized by those who disagree.5 In this paper a comprehensive review and analysis of the evidence relating to the single bullet theory is undertaken. Evidence that has become available since 1964 is included in this review. As a first step in this analysis, fact and opinion are separated to see what conclusions flow from the evidence. When the expert opinion is put to the side, a consistent picture emerges from the photographic evidence, eyewitness testimony, and the physical and medical evidence. This picture is not consistent with the Commission’s single bullet theory. In reviewing the expert evidence, it becomes apparent that much of the opinion relating to the trajectory of the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the neck is based on a badly flawed re-enactment of the assassination in which the wrong vehicle was used. By examining the photographs and scale drawings of the President’s car, the trajectory for the first bullet can be determined by geometry, based on the simple and probable assumption that the first bullet did not change direction in passing through the President’s neck. Given the magnitude of the task and the relatively short time to work, it is not surprising that the Commission made mistakes.6 This paper is not intended as a criticism of the Commission. The purpose 2 of this paper is merely to demonstrate that the single bullet theory is incompatible with the facts and to show that a simpler explanation flows naturally from the evidence. The Reasons For and Against the Single Bullet Theory The single bullet theory was created to explain how both Governor Connally and President Kennedy could have been wounded by frame 240 of the Zapruder film if, as the Commission found, neither had been hit before frame 210.7 There was not sufficient time for Oswald to have fired two shots from his bolt-action Mannlicher-Carcano rifle within this time interval. The Commission concluded it was likely that one bullet caused the President’s neck wound and all of the Governor’s wounds. The Report of the Warren Commission provides two reasons the majority of Commission members found the single bullet theory compelling: 1. The bullet that passed through President Kennedy’s neck did not directly hit any bone and made a clean exit wound. Simulation tests showed that the bullet likely exited the President’s neck at more than three-quarters of its original speed. Its trajectory indicated that it must have continued on to hit something or someone inside the car. It should have made a noticeable mark if it struck the interior of the car traveling at this speed and no such mark was found. The absence of a bullet mark in the interior of the President’s limousine meant that the bullet that exited the President’s neck must have struck Governor Connally. The Commission accepted that Governor Connally’s three wounds were made by the same bullet. 2. Although the trajectory of the first bullet seems to go to the left, it was thought that the Governor could have been seated sufficiently far to the left for his right armpit to align with the bullet trajectory. Since the Warren Commission Report was published, a third reason has been advanced to support the single bullet theory: 3. The FBI arranged for physical analyses of bullet CE399 and the various bullet fragments found in the Governor’s wrist wounds and on the car floor. Pieces of the metal fragments and whole bullet were subjected to Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) which is a very accurate method of determining relative proportions of trace elements in material. The Warren Commission apparently found that this evidence was inconclusive and did not refer to it in its report. However, in 1978 the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) revisited these tests and heard from an expert who was of the opinion that the data supported the single bullet theory. There are three main arguments against the single bullet hypothesis: 1. Governor Connally was adamant that he was hit by the second shot. He said that after he heard the first shot and after he had turned to his right to see the President he felt the bullet hit him from behind. He said that he reacted immediately and collapsed into his wife’s lap. Mrs. Connally recalled that she heard the first shot, saw the President clutch his throat and then heard the second shot and saw her husband hit by it. Other witnesses said they saw much the same thing. 2. For the single bullet theory to work, the bullet path from President Kennedy’s throat to Governor Connally’s right armpit had to align with a path moving from right to left through both men. This required Governor Connally to be seated with his right shoulder to the left of the President’s neck. It is not apparent that the bullet paths are ever aligned or even close. 3. If the single bullet theory is correct, one of the three bullets must have missed the President’s limousine entirely. An FBI reconstruction of the shooting showed that this was unlikely. 3 A critical examination of these reasons requires a careful review and analysis of the evidence. 1. The Eyewitnesses The Time of the First Shot The Warren Commission acknowledged that it was difficult to pinpoint the time of the first shot but concluded that it likely occurred between frames Z210 and Z225 of the Zapruder film.8 The President showed no clear sign of reacting to a bullet when he all but disappeared from Abraham Zapruder’s view at frame Z204 as the car passed behind the Stemmons Freeway sign. He was visibly reacting to his neck wound when he began to emerge from behind the sign about a second later at Z225 and his hands appear to be at the same position in the previous frame, Z224 (see infra, page 12). If the President was reacting to his neck wound at Z224, the first shot must have occurred before Z224. Allowing for some time for the human brain to realize that something happened and for the muscles to respond, the latest time for the first shot would have to be a few frames before Z224. According to the evidence, there were two photographs taken very close to the moment of the first shot. The first is Hugh Betzner’s #3 photograph which, as Mr. Betzner testified in an affidavit sworn on the day of the assassination, was taken just before the first shot. He said that he took this photograph and had just started winding his camera to take another when he heard the first shot.9 Hugh Betzner’s #3 photo said to be taken less than a second before the first shot at Z186 Enlarged detail, right: President Kennedy between Secret Service agents and man on left. The second is Phillip Willis’ #5 photograph. Willis testified that this photograph was taken at the very instant the first shot was heard. Mr. Willis stated that he was poised to take the picture at that time and he thought the noise of the shot may have triggered a reflex response prompting him to press the shutter button at that moment.10 If the photo was taken at the moment the sound of the first shot reached Willis, the first bullet struck the President about one frame earlier, at Z201.11 Both photographs capture Abraham Zapruder holding his camera and the Zapruder film shows both photographers taking their pictures.
Recommended publications
  • A Legal-Scientific Analysis of the Warren Commission's Single Bullet
    The Magic Bullet: A Legal-Scientific analysis of the Warren Commission’s Single Bullet Theory Andrew M. Mason1 Since its publication in 1964, the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy 2 has been mired in controversy. In reaching its conclusion that President Kennedy was the victim of a lone assassin, the Warren Commission adopted the “single bullet theory” to explain the sequence of three shots directed at the President’s limousine. Three of the seven Commission members apparently disagreed with the theory on the grounds that the evidence did not support it. The lack of clear evidence for the theory and its inconsistency with key eyewitness testimony has provided fertile ground for conspiracy theorists who allege that the explanation was concocted to support the Commission’s conclusion that all shots were fired from Oswald’s rifle.3 According to the single bullet theory, a one-inch long, copper jacketed, lead core 6.5 millimeter rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck, Governor Connally’s chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. In doing so, the bullet traversed 19 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a tie knot, removed 4 inches of rib and shattered a radius bone. Despite leaving several small particles of lead behind in the Governor’s wounds, the missile emerged from its tortuous journey remarkably unscathed. The bullet that is supposed to have done all this damage was found on Governor Connally’s stretcher in the corridor at the Parkland Hospital in Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK Lancer "Dallas in November" 1996 Conference Updated
    ASSASSINATION CHRONICLES "Serving the research community, educating a new generation." Vol. 2, Issue 2 SUMMER 1996 Dedicated to the study of President John F. Kennedy JFK Lancer "Dallas In November" 1996 Conference Updated THE CIA & JFK Jim Garrison JAMES FILES' CONFESSION Newly Found Film RELEASED DOCUMENTS New Interview with Gaeton Fonzi by Steve Bochan, with Gordon Winslow IFIC. LANCER PRODUCTIONS & PUBLICATIONS Kennedy Assassination Chronicles JFK - Lancer A message Productions & Publications "Serving the research community - from LANCER educating a new generation." • ASSASSINATION CHRONICLES NEWSMAGAZINE ...bringing you the latest research. JFK LANCER is proud to be a self-supporting company which actively supports the research Pt rBLICATIONIMAFI.INC DATES: community by maintaining a strong presence on Winter:December/January Spring:MarchlApril the Internet, making research materials available Summer:June/July to purchase, publishing research manuscripts, and Fall:September/0 holding informative events. Another ongoing goal SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION: is to work closely with educators around the coun- S $30 Canada $32 International $38/$40* try to develop learning modules and workbooks SingleiBack Issues $8.00 for the classroom. 'shipped via air ASSASSINATION CHRONICLES Is our Note your mailing label for the last newsmagazine devoted to providing information our sukiscri on President John F. Kennedy and related events. It is our hope that interested persons will become activists in the search for truth, join us as new subscribers, and contribute research articles for "NOVEMBER IN DALLAS" future publication. RESEARCH CONFERENCE eld each year on November 22 in Dallas. TX Our Staff Reserve your, place now! THOMAS JONES, Publisher DEBRA CONWAY, Publisher–Art Director GEORGE MICHAEL EVICA, Senior Editor FK LANCER RESOURCE MAIL ORDE Materials on President John F.
    [Show full text]
  • I Am Else to Get Your Paper, Es Gary Suggested. I Reed It This Morning While Resting a Bit
    7/12/69 Dear Don, [ I am else to get your paper, es Gary suggested. I reed it this morning while resting a bit. t'y now you may be en route to Dallas (Gary has not given me your exact schedule). In that evcrn, you will cet thi.: en peer return. ehile chat have reed is fresh in mind, however, 1 offer these comments you may care to consider end i else oak for 0 copy of the bemerd eprague-ltek letter for the comeletion of my files on teat unpoct. in e Doper fer police science studies your apprescj necessarily is more limited then any literary approach. In thin excellent study, hceever, I fear you have permitted the vertisenship of en adversary in s judicial proceeding to deminste. Whether or net this is the basic aeuse, 1 fear you have a single basic and totally untenable conclusion, that the photographic evidence shows no necessity for a single-bullet theory to peetulete a single essessin. Here you hove fellers in the error tee ;.":, comiesioa, belatedly, felt it dare not risk, the only reason they switched to the :inele-bullot theory. You can mats no =eh forTDsulgtion without doite one or two things. both of which you entirely ignored: a) specify the firing ectnowledged by the eomeisaion to nave taken place; b) nevenes your own beliefs ef the actual firing. I've have ecco ated for nellaer. 1 chellenge you to do either in terms of your paper. Mail you been c prosecution eituese, e ict j preeume io the potentials ore police-science mejor, you'd have been ruined on the stend and any eoepletent, prepaid lawyer would have seriously damaged your reputation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.Uit Ue(C Rt
    /1. uit ue(c rt... DISCUSSION - / During the first test shooters fired three rounds. one at each of The data from this study suggests that Oswald was. at most, three targets. Timers measured the period between the second and capable of firing two shots in the time allotted by the Warren third shots. Shooters repeated the test. the second rime with timers Commission. The study was limited by the number of shooters (N measuring the period between the first and third shots. Each test = 6). however each shooter completed each task three times, giving was carried out three times, measured by three timers. with results somewhat greater data. Assuming that Lee Harvey Oswald was averaged individually and as a group. not a more skillful shooter than school-trained SWAT officers, the RESULTS data undermines the assertion by the Warren Commission that Ii. As indicated previously. the mean cycle time for SWAT snipers Oswald was capable of firing three rounds in the time they specified. was found to be 0.99 seconds. Accordingly a correction factors E iwas developed to control for the cycle rate difference between the References anlicher-Carcano and Remington rifles: (2.3 - 0.99 = -1.3 sec / yclei. Subjects fired with 88 percent accuracy, determined by a Callahan, B. Who Shot JFK? New York: Simon & Schuster. 1995. ullet strike within the human sillouhene of the target: in most Mailer. N. Oswald's Tale. An American Mysteo.. New York: Tcases the bullet strikes were to the head. Random House. 1995. SWAT snipers fired two rounds in an average of 3.43 seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Live Recordings' of the Shots in Dealey Plaza
    ‘Live Recordings’ of the Shots in Dealey Plaza: Reliability of Ear-Witness Evidence in the JFK Assassination Andrew M. Mason1 Abstract: Courts and other fact-finding bodies often face the task of examining eyewitness accounts to resolve factual issues. It is not unusual to find significant differences between witness recollections. The JFK assassination record contains a large number of detailed witness accounts of the events seen and heard at the scene of this horrific crime. This body of evidence illustrates how apparently divergent recollections of an event may, nevertheless, converge on particular details and provide a very reliable basis for determining key facts. The Zapruder film captures the visual image of the assassination of President Kennedy but not the sounds of the shots fired at the President’s car. Two major government reviews and hundreds of independent researchers have exhaustively studied the film in an effort to ascertain the number and timing of the shots, which is considered key to whether more than one assassin was involved. Enormous effort has been spent analyzing all the physical evidence that might establish exactly when the bullets were fired. In the clamour for scientific proof, there has been very little attention paid to witness accounts of the relative spacing of the shots. These witnesses recalled a shot pattern that fits with the evidence as a whole but which does not fit the widely accepted single bullet theory. Abraham Zapruder’s 8 mm. movie camera has been described as the only unimpeachable witness to the assassination of President Kennedy.2 The authenticity of the Zapruder film has been verified in meticulous detail.3 Nevertheless, the film has been the source and subject of more controversy and disagreement than any other single piece of evidence relating to the assassination.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential
    CONFIDENTIAL LIST OF MATERIAL WITNESSES IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ***************** **************************************.********* ABLES, DON RAY POLICE JAIL CLERK WHO 09-04-37 STOOD IN LINE-UP WITH 2507 W. Royal Lane LEE HARVEY OSWALD Apt #708 Irving, Texas 75063 AKIN, GENE COLEMAN DOCTOR AT PARKLAND 8207-C Rough Rider Drive HOSPITAL San Antonio, Texas 78239 (1-512-656-4679...Home) (I-512-654-0208...Work) ALBA, ADRIAN THOMAS KNEW OSWALD IN NEW 01-20-31 ORLEANS 621 Rosa Street Metarie, Louisiana 70005 (1-504-831-6799) ALTGENS, JAMES WILLIAM PHOTOGRAPHER IN DEALEY 04-28-19 PLAZA 6441 Pemberton Drive Dallas, Texas 75230 (1-214-368-7766) ARCACHA, SERGIO V. CUBAN EXILE LEADER 01-22-23 10450 SW 75 Lane Miami, Florida 33173 (1-305-595-1363) ARCE, DANNY GARCIA EMPLOYEE OF THE TEXAS 09-14-45 SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY 3506 S. Franklin Street Dallas, Texas 75233 (1-214-330-0228) ARCHER, DON RAY DALLAS POLICE DETECTIVE 02-16-33 2035 San Francisco Drive Dallas, Texas 75228 ARNETT, CHARLES OLIVER 09-06-11 3306 Ivandell Avenue Dallas, Texas 75211 AUGUSTINOVICH, RONALD LEE 2711 East Astor Place Phoenix, Arizona 85032 (1-602-867-3798) BAKER, MARRION LOUIS • DALLAS POLICE OFFICER 08-12-30 1740 Pinto Road Lancaster, Texas 75134 BAKER, VIRGIE RACKLEY EMPLOYEE OF THE TEXAS 09-07-45 SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY 3450 Ivanhoe Lane Abilene, Texas 79605 (1-915-695-4788) BARBER, STEVE ASSASSINATION RESEARCHER (1-419-347-2350) BEAUBOUEF, ALVIN R. FRIEND OF DAVID FERRIS 2701 Marquez Drive Meraux, Louisiana (1-504-271-5432) BELIN, DAVID WILLIAM ASSISTANT COUNSEL FOR 06-20-28 WARREN COMMISSION 1705 Plaza Circle Des Moines, Iowa 50322 (1-515-276-6971) BELL, AUDREY NURSE AT PARKLAND 4708 Baldwin Street HOSPITAL Dallas, Texas (1-214-426-0518) BENAVIDES, DOMINGO WITNESS TO THE MURDER 04-09-37 OF OFFICER TIPPIT 2440 Karen Drive Apt #6 Santa Clara, California 95050 1 BIRCH, FRANCINE FORMER DANCER FOR JACK 9100 Metz Avenue RUBY.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK Resources 07.Pdf
    Welcome Welcome to the first annual JFK Lancer "November In Dallas" Conference presenting Evidence of Conspiracy on the assassi- nation of president John F. Kennedy and the wounding of Governor John Connally. For thirty three years after that horrible day citizens of the world have boldly come forward challenging the official story of how and why the assassination took place. In the words of JFK, "we do this not because it is easy, but because it is hard." It would be easy to be anywhere else but Dallas this week. But we have chosen to do what is hard. We have chosen to come to Dallas to show our committment to the truth. Our sincere appreciation to each you for your support, attendence and participation at the conference. Keep truth alive. Debra Conway Thomas Jones George Michael Evica eatured rs Keynote Speaker: We are pleased to have David Lifton as our Keynote speaker for the first "November In Dallas" Conference. David, with his impressive contributions to the case, will make a presentation you won't want to miss. DAVID LIFTON, is a graduate of Cornell University's School of Engineering Physics (1962). He is the author of "Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of President Kennedy", originally published in hard- cover by Macmillan in 1981 at which time it was a Book of the Month Club Selection, and appeared on the New York Times best seller list for three months. It has had a most unusual publishing history, having been in print for 14 years, via a series of three publishers: Dell, in paperback (1982-88); Carroll and Graf, in trade paperback (1988- 93); and currently New American Library.
    [Show full text]