Infrared Detectors: an Overview

Infrared Physics & Technology 43 (2002) 187–210 www.elsevier.com/locate/infrared Infrared detectors: an overview Antoni Rogalski * Institute of Applied Physics, Military University of Technology, 2 Kaliskiego St., 00-908 Warsaw 49, Poland Abstract The paper presents progress in infrared (IR) detector technologies during 200 history of their development.Clas- sification of two types of IR detectors (photon detectors and thermal detectors) is done on the basis of their principle of operation.The overview of IR systems and detectors is presented.Also recent progress in different IR technologies is described.Discussion is focused mainly on current and the most rapidly developing detectors: HgCdTe heterostructure photodiodes, quantum well AlGaAs/GaAs photoresistors, and thermal detectors.The outlook for near-future trends in IR technologies is also presented. Ó 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Photon detectors; Thermal detectors; Focal plane arrays; Two-colour detectors 1. Introduction • in 1921 Seebeck discovered the thermoelectric effect and soon thereafter demonstrated the first Looking back over the past 1000 years we no- thermocouple, tice that infrared (IR) radiation itself was un- • in 1829 Nobili constructed the first thermopile known until 200 years ago when Herschel’s by connecting a number of thermocouples in se- experiment with thermometer was first reported. ries [4], He built a crude monochromator that used a • in 1933 Melloni modified thermocouple design thermometer as a detector so that he could mea- and used bismuth and antimony for it [5]. sure the distribution of energy in sunlight.In April 1800 he wrote [1]: Thermometer No. 1 rose 7 de- Langley’s bolometer appeared in 1880 [6]. grees in 10 minutes by an exposure to the full red Langley used two thin ribbons of platinum foil, coloured rays. I drew back the stand...thermometer connected so as to form two arms of a Wheatstone 3 No. 1 rose, in 16 minutes, 88 degrees when its centre bridge.Langley continued to develop his bolome- was 1=2 inch out of the visible rays. ter for the next 20 years (400 times more sensitive The early history of IR was reviewed about 40 than his first efforts).His latest bolometer could years ago in two well-known monographs [2,3]. detect the heat from a cow at a distance of a The most important steps in development of IR quarter of mile.Thus, at the beginning the devel- detectors are the following: opment of IR detectors was connected with thermal detectors. The photon detectors were developed in XX * Fax: +48-22-685-9109. century.The first IR photoconductor was devel- E-mail address: [email protected] (A.Rogalski). oped by Case in 1917 [7].In 1933 Kutzscher at 1350-4495/02/$ - see front matter Ó 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S1350-4495(02)00140-8 188 A. Rogalski / Infrared Physics & Technology 43 (2002) 187–210 Fig.1.History of the development of IR detectors. University of Berlin, discovered that lead sulphide class of detectors the radiation is absorbed within (from natural galena found in Sardinia) was the material by interaction with electrons.The photoconductive and had response to about 3 lm observed electrical output signal results from the [8]. changed electronic energy distribution.The pho- Many materials have been investigated in the ton detectors show a selective wavelength depen- IR field.Observing a history of the development of dence of the response per unit incident radiation the IR detector technology, a simple theorem, after power.They exhibit both perfect signal-to-noise Norton [9], can be stated: All physical phenomena performance and a very fast response.But to in the range of about 0.1–1 eV can be proposed for achieve this, the photon detectors require cryo- IR detectors.Among these effects are: thermo- genic cooling.Cooling requirements are the main electric power (thermocouples), change in elec- obstacle to the more widespread use of IR systems trical conductivity (bolometers), gas expansion based on semiconductor photodetectors making (Golay cell), pyroelectricity (pyroelectric detec- them bulky, heavy, expensive and inconvenient to tors), photon drag, Josephson effect (Joseph- use.Depending on the nature of interaction, the son junctions, SQUIDs), internal emission (PtSi class of photon detectors is further sub-divided Schottky barriers), fundamental absorption (in- into different types.The most important are: intrinsic photodetectors), impurity absorption (extrinsic detectors, extrinsic detectors, photoemissive trinsic photodetectors), low-dimensional solids (metal silicide Schottky barriers) detectors, and (superlattice (SL) and quantum well (QW) detec- quantum well detectors.Table 1 shows the com- tors), different type of phase transitions, etc. parison of various IR detectors. Fig.1 gives approximate dates of significant The second class of IR detectors is composed of development efforts for the materials mentioned. thermal detectors.In a thermal detector the inci- The years during World War II saw the origins of dent radiation is absorbed to change temperature modern IR detector technology.Interest has cen- of the material, and the resultant change in some tred mainly on the wavelengths of the two atmo- physical properties is used to generate an electrical spheric windows 3–5 and 8–14 lm, though in output.The detector element is suspended on lags, recent years there has been increasing interest in which are connected to the heat sink.Thermal longer wavelengths stimulated by space applica- effects are generally wavelength independent; the tions [10]. signal depends upon the radiant power (or its rate of change) but not upon its spectral content.In pyroelectric detectors a change in the internal 2. Classification of IR detectors spontaneous polarisation is measured, whereas in the case of bolometers a change in the electrical Progress in IR detector technology is connected resistance is measured.In contrast to photon de- mainly to semiconductor IR detectors, which are tectors, the thermal detectors typically operate at included in the class of photon detectors.In this room temperature.They are usually characterized A. Rogalski / Infrared Physics & Technology 43 (2002) 187–210 189 Table 1 Comparison of IR detectors (after Ref.[11]) Detector type Advantages Disadvantages Thermal Light, rugged, reliable, and low cost Low detectivity at high frequency Room temperature operation Slow response (ms order) Photon Intrinsic IV–VI Available low-gap materials Poor mechanical Well studied Large permittivity II–VI Easy band-gap tailoring Non-uniformity over large area Well-developed theory and exp.High cost in growth and processing Multicolour detectors III–V Good material and dopants Heteroepitaxy with large lattice mismatch Advanced technology Possible monolithic integration Extrinsic Very long wavelength operation Extremely low temperature operation Relatively simple technology Free carriers Low-cost, high yields Low quantum efficiency Large and close packed 2D arrays Low temperature operation Quantum wells Type I Matured material growth Low quantum efficiency Good uniformity over large area Complicated design and growth Multicolour detectors Type II Low Auger recombination rate Complicated design and growth Easy wavelength control Sensitive to the interfaces by modest sensitivity and slow response but they best values of NEDT, below 0.1 K, could be are cheap and easy to use.The greatest utility in reached because effective noise bandwidths < 100 IR technology has found bolometers, pyroelectric Hz can be achieved. detectors and thermopiles. Uncooled, monolithic focal plane arrays (FPAs) Up till the nineties, thermal detectors have been fabricated from thermal detectors may revolutio- considerably less exploited in commercial and nise development of thermal imagers.Recently, military systems in comparison with photon de- very encouraging results have been obtained with tectors.The reason for this disparity is that ther- micromachined silicon bolometer [10,12] and py- mal detectors are popularly believed to be rather roelectric detector arrays [10,13]. slow and insensitive in comparison with photon detectors.As a result, the worldwide effort to develop thermal detectors was extremely small rela- tive to that of photon detector.In the last decade 3. Focal plane arrays however, it has been shown that extremely good imagery can be obtained from large thermal de- There are a number of architectures used in the tector arrays operating uncooled at TV frame development of IR FPAs.In general, they may be rates.The speed of thermal detectors is quite ad- classified as hybrid and monolithic.The central equate for non-scanned imagers with two-dimen- design questions involve performance advantages sional (2D) detectors.The moderate sensitivity of versus ultimate producibility.Each application thermal detectors can be compensated by a large may favour a different approach depending on number of elements in 2D electronically scanned the technical requirements, projected costs, and arrays.With large arrays of thermal detectors the schedule. 190 A. Rogalski / Infrared Physics & Technology 43 (2002) 187–210 In the monolithic approach, some of the mul- ogy with Schottky-barrier detectors is the only tiplexing is done in the detector material itself than technology, which has matured to a level of in an external readout circuit.The basic element of practical use. a monolithic array is a metal–insulator–semicon- Hybrid FPAs detectors and multiplexers are ductor (MIS) structure as shown in Fig.2(c).A fabricated on different substrates and mated with MIS capacitor detects and integrates the IR-gen- each other by the flip-chip bonding (Fig.3) or erated photocurrent.Although efforts have been loophole interconnection.In this case we can op- made to develop monolithic FPAs using narrow- timise the detector material and multiplexer inde- gap semiconductors, silicon-based FPA technol- pendently.Other advantages of the hybrid FPAs Fig. 2. Monolithic IR FPAs: (a) all-silicon; (b) heteroepitaxy-on-silicon; (c) non-silicon (e.g., HgCdTe CCD) (after Ref. [14]). Fig.3.Hybrid IR FPA with independently optimised signal detection and readout: (a) indium bump technique, (b) loophole technique.

Load more