AA Spring 05 Pg C1-11 2/23/05 3:59 PM Page C1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AA Spring 05 Pg C1-11 2/23/05 3:59 PM Page C1 AA Spring 05 pg C1-11 2/23/05 3:59 PM Page C1 DEMYSTIFYING THE MAYA • COLONIZING WESTERN FLORIDA • THE PSEUDOARCHAEOLOGY PHENOMENON americanamerican archaeologyarchaeologySPRING 2005 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 9 No. 1 NEW RESEARCH at Moundville $3.95 AA Spring 05 pg C1-12 B 2/15/05 8:02 PM Page C2 Journey Back in Time with archaeological tours 20000 BC Caves and Castles (15 days): Prof.Roy Larick, U of Iowa,brings the Ice Age to life as we examine the painted and incised Paleolithic art in northern Spain and southern France. 424 BC Sicily and Southern Italy (17 days): 3500 BC Join Dr.Robert Bianchi,archaeologist Malta, Sardinia and and art historian,as we study Greek Corsica (18 days): See temples and theaters,Roman villas, these legendary islands Pompeii,the amazing "Bronzes of with Dr.Mattanyah Riace" and unsurpassed collections Zohar,Hebrew U,and of classical art. explore megalithic temples,nuraghic villages and mysterious cult sites. 1400 BC 175 BC The Splendors of Ancient Egypt Sri Lanka (18 days): Explore one of (20 days): Visit the monumental the first Buddhist kingdoms with Prof. archaeological treasures with our Sudharshan Seneviratne,U of Peradeniya. Egyptologist,Prof.Lanny Bell of Discover magnificent temples and palaces, Brown U,as we travel from Cairo to huge stupas and colorful rituals as we the Delta and sail up the timeless share the roads with elephants and walk Nile from Luxor to Aswan. in the footsteps of kings. Journey back in time with Archaeological Tours. We’ve been taking curious travelers on fascinating historical study tours for the past 30 years. Each one is led by a noted scholar whose knowledge and enthusiasm brings history to life and adds a memorable perspective to your journey. And every one of our 37 tours, from Ireland to China, features superb itineraries, unsurpassed service and our time-tested commitment to excellence. No wonder two-thirds of our clients choose to travel with us again and again. For more information, visit www.archaeologicaltrs.com; e-mail [email protected] or call us at 212-986-3054; toll-free 866-740-5130. Or write to: Archaeological Tours, 271 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017. And see history our way. archaeological tours LED BY NOTED SCHOLARS superb itineraries, unsurpassed service www.archaeologicaltrs.com AA Spring 05 pg C1-12 B 2/15/05 7:55 PM Page 1 american archaeology a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 9 No. 1 spring 2005 COVER FEATURE 19 NEW REVELATIONS AT MOUNDVILLE BY MIKE TONER New research tells of this community’s beginning and end. 12 DEMYSTIFYING THE MAYA BY DAVID MALAKOFF Archaeologists once believed that the Maya mysteriously MOUNDVILLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PARK collapsed over a short period of time. This notion is facing a stern challenge. 26 COLONIZING WESTERN FLORIDA BY KC SMITH The Spanish colonized eastern and western Florida. An investigation shows how differently they approached the two regions. 33 WORKING TOGETHER BY ALISON STEIN WELLNER When the Eastern Pequot wanted to know more about their history, they consulted an archaeologist. 39 THE PECULIAR PHENOMENON OF PSEUDOARCHAEOLOGY TIM BARKER BY KENNETH L. FEDER Is the popularity of pseudoarchaeology reason for concern? 2 Lay of the Land 3 Letters 45 new acquisition A WOODLAND VILLAGE TURNED FRONTIER TOWN 5 Events The Conservancy’s latest preserve in Michigan has had 7 In the News a number of important occupations. New Dating Technique Applied to Prehistoric Hawaiian Temples • Evidence 46 new acquisition Supports Accounts of Aztec Sacrifice • HOHOKAM SITE PRESERVED WITHIN SUBDIVISION Middle Archaic Site Found in Colorado The Shamrock Estates preserve is a model for cultural resource management. 50 Field Notes 52 Reviews 47 point acquisition THE CONSERVANCY ACQUIRES A PLAQUEMINE CULTURE SITE 54 Expeditions Bayou Portage Guidry is an important prehistoric mound site. COVER: Perched atop Mound B, Moundville’s 48 point acquisition tallest structure, is a reconstructed version of IN PURSUIT OF THE FIRST MOUND BUILDERS the paramount chief’s house. Photograph by Richard Alexander Cooke, III The Conservancy preserves Louisiana’s Caney Mounds site. american archaeology 1 AA Spring 05 pg C1-12 B 2/15/05 8:02 PM Page 2 Lay of the Land An Improving Relationship he legal battle over the remains gists are working for the Eastern Pe- of Kennewick Man, the 9,400- quot tribe in Connecticut to help the T year-old skeleton found near tribe better understand their history. Kennewick, Washington, in 1996, This is not an isolated incident. All seemed to pit Native Americans across America, archaeologists are DARREN POORE against archaeologists for control of working closely with tribes. More and MARK MICHEL, President the nation’s history. While that dis- more tribes are establishing their pute did indeed emphasize (and ex- own historic preservation offices to For too many years, archaeolo- aggerate) conflict over the handling gain a greater knowledge of their gists were rightly viewed as non-Na- and disposition of human remains, it own history. They are hiring more ar- tives doing research on Natives. This was only part of the story. chaeologists every year—both Native situation is changing fast as the tribes Spurred to some degree by the and non-Native. They are building devote more resources to studying need to join forces to implement the state-of-the-art curation facilities and their own past and more Native Native American Graves Protection visitor centers on tribal lands with Americans become archaeological and Repatriation Act of 1990, archae- tribal money. The Conservancy works professionals. It is a positive develop- ologists and Indian tribes are working closely with these tribal archaeology ment that needs all of the encourage- together more than ever before. In programs to identify and preserve ar- ment it can get. this issue of American Archaeology, chaeological sites that are important we tell how non-Native archaeolo- to the tribes and the nation. Archaeology learning adventures! Excavation andTravel programs in the Southwest and the world beyond. © Branson Reynolds Native American Art & Archaeology of New Mexico An intimate look at New Mexico’s rich legacy of Native arts & crafts—through the artists’ eyes. July 10–17, 2005 Woven Containers: A Navajo Basket Weaving Workshop Create your own beautiful basket, guided by World-class Navajo weavers Lorraine and Sally Black. July 24–30, 2005 Seasons & Cycles: Pathways of Pueblo Women A fascinating exploration of the lives and times of Pueblo Indian women through history. July 31–August 6, 2005 The Excavated Past Walk through a millennium of intrigue in this retrospective study © Branson Reynolds of archaeology in the Mesa Verde region. August 21–27, 2005 For information and reservations Near Mesa Verde in Southwestern CO or for a Free 2005 program catalog 1-800-422-8975/www.crowcanyon.org CST 2059347-50 CCAC’s programs and admission practices are open to applicants of any race, color, nationality, or ethnic origin. 2 spring • 2005 AA Spring 05 pg C1-12 B 2/15/05 8:03 PM Page 3 Letters NPS Too PC Ban “Anasazi” I was astounded to For a long time, I have Editor’s Corner read in the Winter been bothered by Our feature “The Peculiar Phenomenon of issue that the na- your use of the term Pseudoarchaeology” examines the popu- tional parks were “Anasazi.” Pueblo larity of bogus archaeology and its effects. banning certain people have made it The article’s author, Ken Feder, an archae- books from their clear that this term ologist with Central Connecticut State bookstores. When I is an inappropriate University, has been studying and writing read who the authors name for their an- about this subject for some 20 years. He were, I was even more cestors. By contrast, teaches an introductory course in archae- surprised. Some of our in articles about historic-period ology, and over the years he’s polled his best archaeological authors are sites, you respect African-Ameri- students regarding their acceptance of banned because they did not use cans by using the term they prefer various myths supported by pseudoar- the correct wording for Anasazi for themselves and their forebears. chaeology. (oops, sorry, Ancestral Puebloan) I was moved to write by your In 2003 he asked his students if there or photographed rock art. article on banned books in national is convincing evidence that the lost conti- I have read many books by park bookstores. Every bookstore nent Atlantis exists. Thirty-three percent the banned authors and will sup- in the world has criteria for choos- of his students either strongly or mildly port them in any way I can, even ing stock. No bookstore carries believed that such evidence exists. if it means returning all the every book that is printed, or even Twenty-two percent expressed strong or books I have purchased from the every book on a particular subject. mild disbelief in this evidence. Forty-five Park Service over the years (after If you ran a bookstore, I doubt that percent had no opinion. all, they are now considered “cul- you would carry titles that are con- Some people might find it surprising, turally incorrect”). It is, as one of sidered disrespectful of the people perhaps even shocking, that only 22 per- the authors, Polly Schaafsma, about whom the books were writ- cent of these university students believe stated, a “terrible infringement ten, especially if those people are Atlantis to be a fiction. Feder explained on intellectual freedom.” Politi- your co-workers and neighbors. that his is the first archaeology class that cal correctness has gone much many of these students take, and their too far.
Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina
    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St
    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H
    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit All of the Historic Sites and Museums! Ohiohistory.Org
    Visit all of the historic sites and museums! ohiohistory.org ohiohistory.org • 800.686.6124 35. Fort Ancient Earthworks & Nature Preserve Museum/ Historic Buildings Mounds/ Monument/ Natural Area/ Gift Picnicking NORTHEAST Site Name Restrooms Average Visit 6123 State Route 350, Oregonia 45054 • 800.283.8904 v 190910 Visitor Center Open to Public Earthworks Gravesite Trails (miles) Shop (*shelter) Explore North America’s largest ancient hilltop enclosure, built 15. Custer Monument 1 Armstrong Air & Space Museum 2+ hours 2,000 years ago. Explore an on-site museum, recreated American State Route 646 and Chrisman Rd., New Rumley • 866.473.0417 Indian garden, and miles of hiking trails with scenic overlooks. 2 Cedar Bog Nature Preserve 1 2+ hours Visit the site of George Armstrong Custer’s birthplace and see the monument to the young soldier whose "Last Stand" made him a 36. Fort Hill Earthworks & Nature Preserve 3 Cooke-Dorn House 1 1+ hours household name. 13614 Fort Hill Rd., Hillsboro 45133 • 800.283.8905 Visit one of the best-preserved American Indian hilltop enclosures Ohio. of 4 Fallen Timbers Battlefield Memorial Park 1+ hours 16. Fort Laurens in North America and see an impressive variety of bedrock, soils, 11067 Fort Laurens Rd. NW (CR 102), Bolivar 44612 • 800.283.8914 flora and fauna. history fascinating and varied the life to bring help to 5 Fort Amanda Memorial Park 0.25 * 1+ hours Explore the site of Ohio’s only Revolutionary War fort, built in 1778 groups local these with work to proud is Connection 37. Harriet Beecher Stowe House History Ohio The communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rambler January 1998 Volume 75 Number 1 Managing Editors to the WMC Office
    The Rambler January 1998 Volume 75 Number 1 Managing Editors to the WMC office. Leave hand deliveries in the Blue box Kathy Anderson and Rob Merritt outside the door. The deadline is 6:00 PM on the 15th of the ADVERTISING Jaelene V. Myrup month. Photos of all kinds, B&W and color prints, and slides CLASSIHED ADS Sue deVall will be accepted. Make sure that the photo is labeled with the MAILlNG' <vacant> photographer, date, and names of people. Unless a stamped, PRODUCTION Kathy Anderson and Rob Merritt self-addressed envelope is provided, returned submissions will be available in the Red box outside The Rambler (USPS 053-410) is published monthly by The WMCPurpose WASATCH MOUNTAIN CLUB, Inc., 1390 S., llOO E., suite. (Article II of the WMC Constitution) 103, Salt Lake City, UT 84105-2461. Telephone 463-9842. The pmpose shall be to promote the physical and spiritual well Subscription rates of $12.00 per year are paid for by being of its members and others by outdoor activities: to unite membership dues only. Periodicals postage paid at Salt Lake the energy, interests and knowledge of students, explorers and City, Utah. lovers of the mountains, deserts and rivers of Utah; to collect POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Rambler, and disseminate information regarding the Rocky Mountains in Membership Director, 1390 S, llOO E., Salt Lake City, UT behalf of science, literature and art; to explore and picture the 84105-2443. CHANGE OF ADDRESS: This publication is not scenic wonders of this and surrounding states; and to foster forwarded by the Post Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Plain Pots: a Study of Late Woodland Pottery in Central Alabama by Jason Mann and Richard Krause
    Bulletin 27 November 30, 2009 Plain Pots: A Study of Late Woodland Pottery in Central Alabama By Jason Mann and Richard Krause Discovery and Excavation of the Moundville Earth Lodge By Vernon James Knight Analysis of Daub from Mound V, Moundville: Its Role as an Architectural Indicator By Jeffery L. Sherard Analysis of Wood Charcoal from an Earth Lodge on Mound V at Moundville By Amanda Tickner BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The scientific publication of the Alabama Museum of Natural History. Dr. Phil- lip Harris, Editor. BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is published by the Alalabama Museum of Natural History, a unit of The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN succeeds its predecessor, the MUSEUM PAPERS, which was ter- minated in 1961 upon the transfer of the Museum to the University from its parent organization, the Geological Survey of Alabama. The BULLETIN is devoted primarily to scholarship and research concerning the natural history of Alabama and the Southeast. It appears twice yearly in conse- cucutively numbered issues. Communication concerning manuscripts, style, and editorial policy should be addressed to: Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, The University of Alabama, Box 870345, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0345; tele- phone (205) 348-1831 or emailed to [email protected]. Prospective authors should examine the Notice to Authors inside the back cover. Orders and requests for general information should be addressed to BULLE- TIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATUTURAL HISTORY, at the above address or emailed to [email protected]. Yearly subscriptions (two issues) are $30.00 for individuals, $50.00 for corporations and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures
    State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures Key Objectives State Parks Featured Students will understand some basic information related to the ■ Mounds State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2977.htm Adena, Hopewell and early Woodland Indians, and their connec- ■ Falls of the Ohio State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2984.htm tions to Mounds and Falls of the Ohio state parks. The students will gain insight into the connection between the Adena culture and the Hopewell tradition, and learn how archaeologists have studied artifacts and mounds to understand these cultures. Activity: Standards: Benchmarks: Assessment Tasks: Key Concepts: Mounds Students will research what was import- Artifacts Identify and compare the major early cultures ant to the Adena Indians. The students Tribes Researching SS.4.1.1 that existed in the region that became Indiana will then compile a list of items found in Adena the Past before contact with Europeans. the Adena mounds and compare them to Hopewell items that we use today. Mississippians Identify and describe historic Native American Use computers in a cooperative group groups that lived in Indiana before the time of to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.2 early European exploration, including ways that the era of the Adena to the rise of the the groups adapted to and interacted with the Hopewell Indians. physical environment. Use computers in a cooperative group Create and interpret timelines that show rela- to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.15 tionships among people, events and movements the era of the Adena to the rise of the in the history of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegories of Native America in the Fiction of James Purdy
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MIXEDBLOOD METAPHORS: ALLEGORIES OF NATIVE AMERICA IN THE FICTION OF JAMES PURDY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By MICHAEL E. SNYDER Norman, Oklahoma 2009 MIXEDBLOOD METAPHORS: ALLEGORIES OF NATIVE AMERICA IN THE FICTION OF JAMES PURDY A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH BY Dr. Timothy Murphy, Chair Dr. Ronald Schleifer Dr. Craig Womack Dr. Rita Keresztesi Dr. Julia Ehrhardt © Copyright by MICHAEL E. SNYDER 2009 All Rights Reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to express my gratitude to the following people, without whom I could not have completed this project at all, or in the same way: Profound thanks go to my wife and family for support, inspiration, suggestions, and proofreading help: Lori Anderson Snyder, Mary Lou Anderson, Ivy K. Snyder, Marianna Brown Snyder, E. Eugene Snyder, Christine Hadley Snyder, Timothy D. Snyder, Marci Shore, Philip B. Snyder, and Mary Moore Snyder, in Ohio, Oklahoma, San Diego, and New Haven. Deep thanks for thoughtful conversation, improvisation, edification, guidance, and ideas go to my Chair and mentor, Timothy S. Murphy. A very special debt of gratitude goes to John Uecker of New York City. Special thanks to Dr. Jorma Sjoblom of Ashtabula, Ohio. Special thanks to Parker Sams, of Findlay, Ohio, and the Sams family; and Dorothy Purdy, David Purdy, and Christine Purdy, of Berea, Ohio. Many thanks for much inspiration and education go to Craig S. Womack, currently at Emory University. Special thanks for encouragement and support above and beyond the call of duty go to Julia Ehrhardt in the Honors College at the University of Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Lizard Mound County Park
    THE HISTORY OF LIZARD MOUND COUNTY PARK Lizard Mound Park was established in 1950. The park was acquired from the State of Wisconsin in 1986. Lizard Mound is named for its most outstanding effigy mound shaped like a gigantic lizard. Lizard Mound County Park consists of 28 fine examples of effigy mounds that rise three to four feet above the surrounding ground level. Native Americans we now know as the Effigy Mound Builders lived in Wisconsin and bordering states between 700 and 1200 A.D. These Native Americans built mounds shaped like mammals, reptiles, birds and other creatures both real and mythical. The custom of building effigy burial mounds died out about 800 years ago; it was a custom unique to this general area. Unfortunately, very little else is known about the Mound Indians. Even Native Americans who lived in Wisconsin when the first European settlers arrived didn't know why, or by whom, the mounds were built. The earliest data concerning the mounds in the area of Lizard Mound County Park was in the form of a sketch map resulting from field investigations made by Professor Julius L. Torney of Milwaukee in 1883. In his sketch of the mound group, Professor Tourney illustrated a total of 47 Indian mounds. Archeological explorations were conducted in 1960. Exploration of some of the effigy mounds has revealed that the dead were sometimes placed in pits and the effigy mounds were built over the pits. Artifacts such as clay pots, projectile points, pipes, bone harpoons and beads were sometimes placed with the dead.
    [Show full text]