Electron Donor and Ph Relationships for Biologically Enhanced Dissolution of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL in Groundwater

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electron Donor and Ph Relationships for Biologically Enhanced Dissolution of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL in Groundwater European Journal of Soil Biology 43 (2007) 276e282 http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejsobi Original article Electron donor and pH relationships for biologically enhanced dissolution of chlorinated solvent DNAPL in groundwater Perry L. McCarty*, Min-Ying Chu, Peter K. Kitanidis Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Available online 26 March 2007 Abstract Biologically enhanced dissolution offers a method to speed removal of chlorinated solvent dense non-aqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL) sources such as tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichoroethene (TCE) from aquifers. Bioremediation is accomplished by adding an electron donor to the source zone where fermentation to intermediates leading to acetic acid and hydrogen results. The hydrogen and possibly acetic acid are used by dehalogenating bacteria to convert PCE and TCE to ethene and hydrochloric acid. Reductive dehalogenation is thus an acid forming process, and sufficient alkalinity must be present to maintain a near neutral pH. The bicarbonate alkalinity required to maintain pH above 6.5 is a function of the electron donor: 800 mg/L of bicarbonate al- kalinity is sufficient to achieve about 1.2 mM TCE dechlorination with glucose, 1.7 mM with lactate, and a much higher 3.3 mM with formate. Laboratory studies indicate that in mixed culture, formate can be used as an electron donor for complete conversion to ethene, contrary to pure cultures studies indicating it cannot. Various strategies can be used to add electron donor to an aquifer for DNAPL dehalogenation while minimizing pH problems and excessive electron donor usage, including use of injection-extraction wells, dual recirculation wells, and nested injection-extraction wells. Ó 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: DNAPL; Dehalogenation; Tetrachloroethene; Trichloroethene; pH; Alkalinity; Bioremediation; Electron donor; Formate; Glucose; Lactate; Hydrogen; Groundwater 1. Introduction indicated that near-saturation concentrations of chlori- nated solvents can be biodegraded by specialized Tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) anaerobic microorganisms that use the chlorinated sol- are the most frequently found and costly to control vents as electron acceptors in energy metabolism organic contaminants in groundwater. Chlorinated [13,14]. These organisms require an electron donor, solvent spills migrate downward to form dense non- which may be present in the aquifer, leading to natural aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), which constitute attenuation, or most often, must be added as part of an sources of contamination to groundwater that may engineered bioremediation scheme. Efforts based upon last for decades, if not centuries. Recent research has this research are now being directed towards use of biodegradation to reduce the life span of chlorinated solvent DNAPLs. * Corresponding author. Fax: þ1 650 725 3164. Among the advantages of chlorinated solvent E-mail address: [email protected] (P.L. McCarty). DNAPL biodegradation [13] are: (1) it can result in 1164-5563/$ - see front matter Ó 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.03.004 P.L. McCarty et al. / European Journal of Soil Biology 43 (2007) 276e282 277 enhanced rates of solvent dissolution, especially for significant problem, necessitating a high buffer or PCE; (2) the high chlorinated solvent concentrations neutralization capacity to prevent adverse pH condi- near the DNAPL and their degradation products as tions [1]. well are toxic to microorganisms, such as methanogens, Most frequently, organic compounds are used for that otherwise compete with dechlorinating microor- electron donors. Here, fermentation leads to the produc- ganisms for the electron donor; and (3) the costs for de- tion of acetate and hydrogen, as indicated in the follow- livery of the electron donor per unit of solvent degraded ing transformations, using glucose as an example: are much less when applied to high solvent concentra- Glucose as Electron Donor: tions. The question then arises as to what are the best Fermentationof glucose: donors to use for chlorinated solvent dehalogenation and what are the best strategies for their delivery to C6H12O6 þ2H2O ¼ 4H2 þ2CH3COOHþ2CO2 ð6Þ the DNAPL source area? Dehalogenation : CCl2]CCl2 þ 4H2 ¼ 4HCl þ CH2]CH2 ð7Þ 2. Electron donors Net reaction : Reductive dehalogenation of PCE occurs in a step- ] wise fashion, generally with hydrogen as the preferred C6H12O6 þ CCl2 CCl2 þ 2H2O ¼ 2CH3COOH electron donor although acetic and other organic acids þ4HCl þ 2CO2 þ CH2]CH2 ð8Þ may be used by some dehalogenating microorganisms [6,11,12], converting PCE to TCE to 1,2-cis-dichloro- Organic compounds that have been added to aquifers ethene (cDCE) to vinyl chloride (VC), and finally to to achieve reductive dehalogenation include a variety of ethene. soluble organic compounds (pentanol, lactate, methanol, Reactions when using hydrogen for reductive De- ethanol, molasses, benzoate), materials such as vegeta- halogenation of PCE are: ble oils, precipitated compounds such as calcium oleate, natural organic solids such as compost, and various ] ] CCl2 CCl2 þ H2 ¼ CHCl CCl2 þ HCl ð1Þ commercially available products, such as ‘‘slow hydro- gen release compounds’’ or HRCs. Some of their CHCl]CCl þ H ¼ CHCl]CHCl þ HCl ð2Þ 2 2 relative advantages and disadvantages have been CHCl]CHCl þ H2 ¼ CH2]CHCl þ HCl ð3Þ addressed [14]. A major limitation for DNAPL dissolu- tion as indicated in Eq. (8) is that not only are four ] ] CH2 CHCl þ H2 ¼ CH2 CH2 þ HCl ð4Þ moles of hydrochloric acid produced, but also acetic acid. The latter not only requires additional buffer, but Net : CCl2]CCl2 þ 4H2 ¼ CH2]CH2 þ 4HCl ð5Þ also adds an undesirable organic compound to the Different microorganisms have different abilities aquifer, which can lead to further degradation of water to use PCE, TCE, cDCE, and VC in energy metab- quality through iron, manganese, or sulfate reduction, olism. There are several different bacterial genera and methane formation. capable of using PCE and TCE, but only Dehalococ- There are reports that acetic acid may serve by itself coides has been found to use cDCE and VC in for partial [11] or perhaps complete [6] dehalogenation energy metabolism [3e5,9]. Interestingly, different of PCE and TCE to ethene. This would reduce the con- Dehalococcoides strains are restricted in the chlori- centration of acetic acid, but would lead to the produc- nated species that they can dehalogenate. Thus, in tion of two moles of the weak-acid forming carbon order to obtain complete dehalogenation efficiently, dioxide: a strain that uses VC in energy metabolism is required [3,5]. CCl2]CCl2 þ CH3COOH þ 2H2O ¼ CH2]CH2 Hydrogen itself may be injected into an aquifer, þ 2CO2 þ 4HCl ð9Þ but has several disadvantages. It has low solubility (about 1 mM), which can be a significant limitation Thus, acetic acid utilization for dehalogenation may for DNAPL dehalogenation. It is a hazardous com- have some, but perhaps not a great impact in reducing pound, and as indicated in Eqs. (1)e(5), an end the acid problem with dehalogenation. product of dehalogenation is hydrochloric acid. An ideal compound for DNAPL biodegradation The high hydrochloric acid production can be a would be sufficiently soluble, would not lead to the 278 P.L. McCarty et al. / European Journal of Soil Biology 43 (2007) 276e282 production of acetic acid, and would be self-neutraliz- In addition, the acetic acid that is formed when ing of hydrochloric acid production. A compound that most organics are fermented to form hydrogen also de- meets these characteristics is formate. presses pH: Formate as Electron Donor: CH COOH ¼ Hþ þ CH COOÀ; Â 3ÃÂ Ã 3 Formate disproportionation : þ À À Á H CH3COO À5 ¼ Ka ¼ 1:72 10 at 20 C ð16Þ 4HCOONa þ 4H2O ¼ 4NaHCO3 þ 4H2 ð10Þ ½CH3COOH Reductive dehalogenation of PCE : The pH problem can be especially difficult when ap- plying biological reduction to biologically enhanced CCl ]CCl þ 4H ¼ 4HCl þ CH ]CH ð11Þ 2 2 2 2 2 dense non-aqueous phase (DNAPL) chlorinated solvent Acid neutralization : dissolution. Here, dehalogenation of high concentra- tions of chlorinated solvent can result in production of 4NaHCO3 þ 4HCl ¼ 4NaCl þ 4CO2 þ 4H2O ð12Þ high hydrochloric acid and acetic acid production, necessitating a large buffer capacity to prevent adverse Net reaction : pH drop. Fig. 1 illustrates the change in pH as a function CCl2]CCl2 þ 4HCOONa ¼ CH2]CH2 of the extent of dechlorination with groundwaters start- ing with different bicarbonate alkalinities (mg/L as þ4NaCl þ 4CO2 ð13Þ CaCO3). This is based upon the use of hydrogen alone for reductive dehalogenation. Enhanced dissolution of Formate is enzymatically converted into bicarbonate TCE or PCE DNAPL might lead to the production of and hydrogen (Eq. (10)). The hydrogen is used for re- 10 to 20 mM chloride or more. The figure illustrates ductive dehalogenation (Eq. (11)), and the hydrochloric acid produced is neutralized by the bicarbonate that in order to maintain pH of about 6.5 or above for maximum reduction rates, no more dechlorination (Eq. (12)). The net result is the production of ethene, so- could be achieved than about 3.3 mM with an initial dium chloride, and carbon dioxide gas. Carbon dioxide bicarbonate alkalinity of 400 mg/L, double that to is a highly soluble weak-acid gas, and some bicarbonate 6.6 mM with alkalinity of 800 mg/L, and double that must be present to buffer its impact. again to 13.2 mM with alkalinity of 1600 mg/L. The later of 13.2 mM chloride could result from complete 3. Electron donor, alkalinity, and pH relationships dechlorination of 4.3 mM TCE, which is only about one half of the TCE solubility of 8.4 mM. Ideally for bi- The rates of biological reactions are affected greatly ologically enhanced dissolution of TCE, much greater by pH, with most organisms favoring a near-neutral pH dehalogenation than this would be desirable.
Recommended publications
  • Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria's Response to Extreme Ph Environments and the Effect of Their Activities on Microbial Corrosion
    applied sciences Review Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria’s Response to Extreme pH Environments and the Effect of Their Activities on Microbial Corrosion Thi Thuy Tien Tran 1 , Krishnan Kannoorpatti 1,* , Anna Padovan 2 and Suresh Thennadil 1 1 Energy and Resources Institute, College of Engineering, Information Technology and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia; [email protected] (T.T.T.T.); [email protected] (S.T.) 2 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, College of Engineering, Information Technology and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are dominant species causing corrosion of various types of materials. However, they also play a beneficial role in bioremediation due to their tolerance of extreme pH conditions. The application of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in bioremediation and control methods for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in extreme pH environments requires an understanding of the microbial activities in these conditions. Recent studies have found that in order to survive and grow in high alkaline/acidic condition, SRB have developed several strategies to combat the environmental challenges. The strategies mainly include maintaining pH homeostasis in the cytoplasm and adjusting metabolic activities leading to changes in environmental pH. The change in pH of the environment and microbial activities in such conditions can have a Citation: Tran, T.T.T.; Kannoorpatti, significant impact on the microbial corrosion of materials. These bacteria strategies to combat extreme K.; Padovan, A.; Thennadil, S. pH environments and their effect on microbial corrosion are presented and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis and Photoinduced Electron Transfer of Donor-Sensitizer-Acceptor Systems
    Synthesis and Photoinduced Electron Transfer of Donor-Sensitizer-Acceptor Systems Yunhua Xu Stockholm University 2005 1 Synthesis and Photoinduced Electron Transfer of Donor-Sensitizer-Acceptor Systems Akademisk avhandling som för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen vid Stockholms Universitet, tillsammans med arbetena I-VII, offentligen kommer att försvaras i Magnélisalen, Kemiska övnings-laboratoriet, Svante Arrhenius väg 16, onsdagen den 20 april 2005, klockan 10.00. Av Yunhua Xu Avhandlingen försvaras på engelska Institutionen för organisk kemi ISBN 91-7155-034-8 pp 1-53 Arrheniuslaboratoriet Stockholm 2005 Stockholms Universitet 106 91 Stockholm Abstract Artificial systems involving water oxidation and solar cells are promising ways for the conversion of solar energy into fuels and electricity. These systems usually consist of a photosensitizer, an electron donor and / or an electron acceptor. This thesis deals with the synthesis and photoinduced electron transfer of several donor-sensitizer- acceptor supramolecular systems. The first part of this thesis describes the synthesis and properties of two novel dinuclear ruthenium complexes as electron donors to mimic the donor side reaction of Photosystem II. These two Ru2 complexes were then covalently linked to ruthenium trisbipyridine and the properties of the resulting trinuclear complexes were studied by cyclic voltammetry and transient absorption spectroscopy. The second part presents the synthesis and photoinduced electron transfer of covalently linked donor-sensitizer supramolecular systems in the presence of TiO2 as electron acceptors. Electron donors are tyrosine, phenol and their derivatives, and dinuclear ruthenium complexes. Intramolecular electron transfer from the donor to the oxidized sensitizer was observed by transient absorption spectroscopy after light 2+ excitation of the Ru(bpy)3 moiety.
    [Show full text]
  • Donor/Acceptor Electronic Coupling Is a Dynamical Variable Edward W
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont All HMC Faculty Publications and Research HMC Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2000 Solvent as Electron Donor: Donor/Acceptor Electronic Coupling Is a Dynamical Variable Edward W. Castner Jr. Rutgers University Darcy Kennedy '00 Claremont McKenna College Robert J. Cave Harvey Mudd College Recommended Citation Castner, E.W. Jr.; Kennedy, D.; Cave, R.J. “Solvent as Electron Donor: Donor/Acceptor Coupling is a Dynamical Variable,” J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2869. DOI: 10.1021/jp9936852 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the HMC Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in All HMC Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2869-2885 2869 ARTICLES Solvent as Electron Donor: Donor/Acceptor Electronic Coupling Is a Dynamical Variable Edward W. Castner, Jr.*,† BrookhaVen National Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Building 555A, Upton, New York 11973-5000 Darcy Kennedy and Robert J. Cave*,‡ HarVey Mudd College, Department of Chemistry, Claremont, California 91711 ReceiVed: October 14, 1999; In Final Form: December 24, 1999 We combine analysis of measurements by femtosecond optical spectroscopy, computer simulations, and the generalized Mulliken-Hush (GMH) theory in the study of electron-transfer reactions and electron donor- acceptor interactions. Our focus is on ultrafast photoinduced electron-transfer reactions from aromatic amine solvent donors to excited-state acceptors. The experimental results from femtosecond dynamical measurements fall into three categories: six coumarin acceptors reductively quenched by N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA), eight electron-donating amine solvents reductively quenching coumarin 152 (7-(dimethylamino)-4-(trifluoromethyl)- coumarin), and reductive quenching dynamics of two coumarins by DMA as a function of dilution in the nonreactive solvents toluene and chlorobenzene.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Life, Bioenergetics and Metabolism
    Ocean life, bioenergetics and metabolism Biological Oceanography (OCN 621) Matthew Church (MSB 612) Ecosystems are hierarchically organized • Atoms → Molecules → Cells → Organisms→ Populations→ Communities • This organizational system dictates the pathways that energy and material travel through a system. • Cells are the lowest level of structure capable of performing ALL the functions of life. Classification of life Two primary cellular forms • Prokaryotes: lack internal membrane-bound organelles. Genetic information is not separated from other cell functions. Bacteria and Archaea are prokaryotes. Note however this does not imply these divisions of life are closely related. • Eukaryotes: membrane-bound organelles (nucleus, mitochrondrion, etc .). Compartmentalization (organization) of different cellular functions allows sequential intracellular activities In the ocean, microscopic organisms account for >50% of the living biomass. Controls on types of organisms, abundances, distributions • Habitat: The physical/chemical setting or characteristics of a particular environment, e.g., light vs. dark, cold vs. warm, high vs. low pressure • Each marine habitat supports a somewhat predictable assemblage of organisms that collectively make up the community, e.g., rocky intertidal community, coral reef community, abyssobenthic community • The structure and function of the individuals/populations in these communities arise from evolution and selective adaptations in response to the habitat characteristics • Niche: The role of a particular organism in an integrated community •The ocean is not homogenous: spatial and temporal variability in habitats Clearly distinguishable ocean habitats with elevated “plant” biomass in regions where nutrients are elevated The ocean is stirred more than mixed Sea Surface Temperature Chl a (°C) (mg m-3) Spatial discontinuities at various scales (basin, mesoscale, microscale) in ocean habitats play important roles in controlling plankton growth and distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Biological Chemistry
    CHAPTER Introduction to Biological Chemistry Reza Karimi 1 1. Learn about the basic chemistry related to atoms and molecules. Understand the roles of orbitals and lone-pair electrons in a few common atoms (e.g., N, F, C, O) and comprehend nucleophilic/electrophilic attacks and their impact on oxidation, reduction, addition, and substitution reactions. 2. List and explain the importance of medicinal functional groups that commonly are found in drug molecules and appreciate the important roles that drug structures play in pharmaceutical sciences. 3. Understand basic concepts in acid–base theory and their roles in the structures of drug molecules. 4. Learn about salt formation, ionization, and water solubility of drug molecules, and explain the role of medici- nal functional groups in ionization, salt formation, salt hydrolysis, and water solubility of drug molecules. CHAPTER OUTLINE CHAPTER 5. Implement a series of Learning Bridge assignments at your experiential sites to bridge your didactic learning with your experiential experiences. S 1. Brønsted-Lowry acid–base: definition used to express the acidic or basic properties of acids and bases. E V 2. Buffer: a mixture of an acid and its conjugate base in a solution that causes the solution to resist a pH change. 3. Compound: a combination of two or more substances, ingredients, or elements. While the ecti J majority of drugs on the market are compounds, not all compounds are drugs. B 4. Conjugate acid: a base that has gained a proton. O 5. Conjugate base: an acid that has lost its proton. 6. Covalence: the number of covalent bonds present.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Electron Acceptor and Electron Donor on The
    FULL PAPER Carbon Dots www.afm-journal.de Influence of Electron Acceptor and Electron Donor on the Photophysical Properties of Carbon Dots: A Comparative Investigation at the Bulk-State and Single-Particle Level Indrajit Srivastava, John S. Khamo, Subhendu Pandit, Parinaz Fathi, Xuedong Huang, Anleen Cao, Richard T. Haasch, Shuming Nie, Kai Zhang,* and Dipanjan Pan* photocatalysis, photovoltaic applications, Carbon dots (CDs) are extensively studied to investigate their unique optical and bioimaging.[1–15] These nanodots have properties such as undergoing electron transfer in different scenarios. This a multitude of intriguing advantages, work presents an in-depth investigation to study the ensemble-averaged such as their water solubility, low toxicity, state/bulk state and single-particle level photophysical properties of CDs high biocompatibility, easy synthesis tech- niques, and complementary energy and that are passivated with electron-accepting (CD-A) and electron-donating charge transfer properties.[16–25] However, molecules (CD-D) on their surface. The bulk-state experiments reveal that in a despite considerable efforts, many ques- mixture of these CDs, CD-A dominates the overall photophyiscal properties and tions remain about the intrinsic mecha- eventually leads to formation of at least two associated geometries, which is nisms governing their photoluminescence dependent on time, concentration, intramolecular electron/charge transfer, and (PL) and its subsequent capability to par- ticipate in photoinduced charge-transfer hydrogen bonding. Single-particle studies, however, do not reveal an “acceptor- processes.[26,27] dominating” scenario based on analysis of instantaneous intensity, bleaching For charge-transfer processes, having kinetics, and photoblinking, indicating that the direct interaction of these CDs a precise control over the interactions may affect their photophysical properties in the bulk state due to formation of between the two components is of hierarchical structural assemblies.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Donor and Acceptor Utilization by Halorespiring Bacteria'
    Electron donor andaccepto r utilizationb y halorespiring bacteria Maurice L.G.C. Luijten CENTRALS LANDBOUWCATALOGUS 0000 0950 9080 Promotoren Prof.dr .W.M . de Vos Hoogleraar ind eMicrobiologi c Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr .ir .A.J.M .Stam s Persoonlijk hoogleraar bij hetlaboratoriu mvoo r Microbiologic Laboratorium voor Microbiologic, Wageningen Universiteit Copromotoren Dr.G .Schra a Universitair docent Laboratorium voor Microbiologic, Wageningen Universiteit Dr.A.A.M . Langenhoff Senior researcher/project leader Milieubiotechnologie, TNO-MEP Promotiecommissie Prof. E.J.Bouwe r John's Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA Prof.dr .C .Hollige r EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Dr.F .Volkerin g Tauw bv, Deventer, Nederland Prof. dr.ir .W.H . Rulkens Wageningen Universteit Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool SENSE (Netherlands Research School forth e Socio-Economic andNatura l Sciences ofth e Environment). LV''-:- v. •:-:::'.Ifir Electron donor and acceptor utilizationb y halorespiring bacteria Maurice L.G.C.Luijte n Proefschrift Terverkrijgin g van de graadva n doctor opgeza gva n derecto r magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, prof. dr. ir. L. Speelman, inhe t openbaar te verdedigen opvrijda g 11 juni 2004 desnamiddag s te half twee in deAula . \ '\ i ocXi ^ Electron donor and acceptor utilization byhalorespirin g bacteria Maurice L.G.C. Luijten Ph.D.thesi sWageninge n University, Wageningen, The Netherlands 2004 ISBN 90-5804-067-1 Front cover: Modified EMpictur e ofSulfurospirillum halorespirans PCE-M2 — ry ' Stellingen 1.El k nadeel heb zijn voordeel. Dit proefschrift. 2. De ene volledige reductie van PCE is de andere nog niet. Dit proefschrift. 3. Sectorale communicatie reikt niet ver genoeg. HRH the Prince of Orange, Wat.
    [Show full text]
  • A Structural Basis of Light Energy and Electron Transfer in Biology*
    The EMBO Journal vol.8 no.8 pp.2125-2147, 1989 NOBEL LECTURE A structural basis of light energy and electron transfer in biology* Robert Huber bacterial phycobilisomes and blue oxidases. A wealth of structural and functional data is available for these three Max-Planck-Institut fiir Biochemie, D-8033 Martinsried, FRG systems, which make them uniquely appropriate examples *Dedicated to Christa. from which to derive general principles of light energy and electron transfer in biological materials. Indeed, there are Aspects of intramolecular light energy and electron few systems known in sufficient detail for such purposes. transfer will be discussed for three protein-cofactor [The strucure of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centre complexes, whose three-dimensional structures have been (RC) is closely related to the R. viridis RC (Allen et al., elucidated by X-ray crystallography: components of light- 1986, 1987; Chang et al., 1986). A green bacterial harvesting cyanobacterial phycobilisomes; the purple bacteriochlorophyll-a-containing light-harvesting protein is bacterial reaction centre; and the blue multi-copper well defined in structure (Tronrud et al., 1986) but not in oxidases. A wealth of functional data is available for these function. In the multihaem cytochromes (Pierrot et al., 1982; systems which allows specific correlations between Higuchi et al., 1984) the existence/or significance of intra- structure and function and general conclusions about molecular electron transfer is unclear.] light energy and electron transfer in biological materials We strive to understand the underlying physical principles to be made. of light and electron conduction in biological materials with considerable hope for success as these processes appear to be more tractable than other biological reactions, which involve diffusive motions of substrates and products and Introduction intramolecular motions.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Donor Limitation of the Biosphere Before the Origin of Oxygenic Photosynthesis
    9 Chapter 1 ELECTRON DONOR LIMITATION OF THE BIOSPHERE BEFORE THE ORIGIN OF OXYGENIC PHOTOSYNTHESIS Ward, Lewis M., Birger Rasmussen, and Woodward W. Fischer. In preparation. Abstract: The evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, and the resulting oxygenation of the atmosphere ~2.3 billion years ago, was the single largest shift in the size and structure of the biosphere since the origin of life. Oxygen-fueled metabolisms are highly energetic, and drove the evolution of complex life in Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic time, and oxygenic photosynthesis itself came to dominate primary productivity on the surface of the Earth. Perhaps more revolutionary than the introduction of molecular oxygen, oxygenic photosynthesis introduced the ability for life to utilize water—an essentially infinite electron donor—for autotrophy. Before the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, the biosphere was supported by anaerobic metabolisms such as methanogenesis, acetogenesis, and anoxygenic photosynthesis. In addition to being less energetic than oxygen-based metabolisms, these early autotrophic processes depend on geologically supplied electron donors such as molecular hydrogen and ferrous iron as a source of electrons for reducing CO2 to organic carbon. As a result, the geological fluxes of electron donors may have served as a fundamental limitation to the productivity of the early biosphere, rather than nutrients like phosphate or fixed nitrogen as today. Here, we integrate estimates for the geological fluxes of electron donor compounds, phosphate, and fixed nitrogen to determine the fundamental limits to pre-oxygen productivity. We demonstrate that even if iron 10 oxidation was occurring, it was a relatively minor fuel for productivity compared to molecular hydrogen. Furthermore, we show that fluxes of fixed nitrogen and phosphate were substantially in excess of rates of productivity allowed by the supply of electron donor compounds, even in the absence of biological nitrogen fixation.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Yields for Oxygenic and Anoxygenic Photosynthesis in The
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 74, No. 5, pp. 2152-2156, May 1977 Microbiology Quantum yields for oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis in the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria limnetica (blue-green algae/photosystem I growth/phototrophic evolution/H2S photooxidation) A. OREN*, E. PADAN*, AND M. AVRONt *Department of Microbiological Chemistry, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel; and tWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Communicated by C. Stacy French, February 11, 1977 ABSTRACT A comparison of the quantum yield spectra the missing link between bacterial type and plant type photo- of the oxygenic (H20 as the electron donor) with the anoxygenic trophic metabolic patterns. (H2S as the electron donor) photosynthesis of the cyanobacte- In the with 0. rium, Oscillatoria limnetica reveals that anoxygenic photo- present work limnetica, the quantum yield synthesis is driven by photosystem I only. The highest quantum spectra of the oxygenic and anoxygenic photoassimilation of yields of the latter (maximum; 0.059 CO2 molecules/quantum CO2 were analyzed in order to unravel the pattern by which of absorbed light) were obtained with wavelengths which the absorbed spectrum is used in the two types of photosynthesis preferentially excite photosystem I (<550, >650) in which and to deduce the interrelationship between photosystem I and chlorophyll a and-carotenoids are the major pigments. The II in such an organism. addition of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)1,1-dimethylurea had no effect on anoxygenic photosynthesis, and no enhancement in quantum efficiency was observed by a superimposition of light prefer- MATERIALS AND METHODS entially exciting photosystem II. Cyanobacterial Strain and Culture Conditions. The 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Photosynthesis
    Photosynthesis Photosynthesis is the process by which plants, some bacteria and some protistans use the energy from sunlight to produce glucose from carbon dioxide and water. This glucose can be converted into pyruvate which releases adenosine triphosphate (ATP) by cellular respiration. Oxygen is also formed. Photosynthesis may be summarised by the word equation: carbon dioxide + water glucose + oxygen The conversion of usable sunlight energy into chemical energy is associated with the action of the green pigment chlorophyll. Chlorophyll is a complex molecule. Several modifications of chlorophyll occur among plants and other photosynthetic organisms. All photosynthetic organisms have chlorophyll a. Accessory pigments absorb energy that chlorophyll a does not absorb. Accessory pigments include chlorophyll b (also c, d, and e in algae and protistans), xanthophylls, and carotenoids (such as beta-carotene). Chlorophyll a absorbs its energy from the violet-blue and reddish orange-red wavelengths, and little from the intermediate (green-yellow-orange) wavelengths. Chlorophyll All chlorophylls have: • a lipid-soluble hydrocarbon tail (C20H39 -) • a flat hydrophilic head with a magnesium ion at its centre; different chlorophylls have different side-groups on the head The tail and head are linked by an ester bond. Leaves and leaf structure Plants are the only photosynthetic organisms to have leaves (and not all plants have leaves). A leaf may be viewed as a solar collector crammed full of photosynthetic cells. The raw materials of photosynthesis, water and carbon dioxide, enter the cells of the leaf, and the products of photosynthesis, sugar and oxygen, leave the leaf. Water enters the root and is transported up to the leaves through specialized plant cells known as xylem vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSARY of TERMS USED in BIOINORGANIC CHEMISTRY* GLOSSARY of TERMS USED in BIOINORGANIC CHEMISTRY (IUPAC Recommendations 1997)
    Pure &App/. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 6, pp. 1251-1303, 1997. Printed in Great Britain. Q 1997 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY INORGANIC CHEMISTRY DIVISION WORKING PARTY ON IUPAC GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN BIOINORGANIC CHEMISTRY* GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN BIOINORGANIC CHEMISTRY (IUPAC Recommendations 1997) Prepared for publication by M. W. G. DE BOLSTER Vakgroep Organische en Anorganische Chemie, Faculteit der Scheikunde, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands *Membership of the Working Party during the preparation of this report (1992-96) was as follows: Chairman: M. W. G. de Bolster (Netherlands); Members: R. Cammack (UK); D. N. Coucouvanis (USA); J. Reedijk (Netherlands); C. Veeger (Netherlands). Republication or reproduction of this report or its storage and/or dissemination by electronic means is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgement, with full reference to the source along with use of the copyright symbol 0,the name IUPAC and the year of publication are prominently visible. Publication of a translation into another language is subject to the additional condition of prior approval from the relevant IUPAC National Adhering Organization. Glossary of terms used in bioinorganic chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 1997) Abstract: The glossary contains definitions and (where needed) explanatory notes for about 400 terms used in the multidisciplinary field of bioinorganic chemistry. A need has been recognized for globally acceptable definitions of terms in this field and this glossary was compiled with the objective of fulfilling this need. It is by no means a comprehensive dictionary. The terms selected were those considered essential and/or widely used.
    [Show full text]