Ocean Life, Bioenergetics and Metabolism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Comparing Aerobic Vs. Anaerobic Respiration
Comparing Aerobic vs. Anaerobic Respiration Objective: Students will compare the two types of cellular respiration: aerobic respiration and anaerobic respiration (fermentation). Students will note similarities and differences between the two processes including when, where, and how each process occurs. Students will develop a concept map using Inspiration indicating the criteria for aerobic and anaerobic respiration. This concept map will indicate: Three similarities between the two processes. Two types of cells that perform each process. Location in the cell where each process occurs. Oxygen requirements for each process. Reactants and products for each process. Energy output for each process. Two different types of anaerobic respiration. Reactants and products for each. Types of cells that perform each process. Introduction: This activity will follow a fermentation (anaerobic respiration) lab using yeast. This lab will address the process of alcoholic fermentation. Students will perform push-ups to experience lactic acid build-up in muscle cells. These activities will gain interest in the process of anaerobic respiration. Students will have already studied the detailed process of aerobic cellular respiration. Procedure: Students will work in pairs or trios to answer questions (as seen in benchmarks) on aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Students will use previous notes and lab activities to summarize main ideas for aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Individually, students will create a concept map using Inspiration to further integrate and separate the two processes. Accommodations: Instructions will be provided in written format as well as read orally. Instructions will also be on an overhead. One example will be provided for students on how to summarize data. -
Glycolysis/Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas Pathway (EMP Pathway)
Reaspiration iving cells require a continuous supply of energy for maintaining various life activities. This energy is obtained by oxidizing the organic compounds (carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids) Lin the cells. This process of harvesting chemical energy for metabolic activities in the form of ATP by oxidising the food molecules is called ‘respiration’. The most common substrate used in respiration for oxidation is glucose. Factor affecting the respiration (1) Oxygen Content of the Atmosphere: The percentage of oxygen in the surrounding atmosphere greatly influence the rate of respiration. But reduction of the oxygen content of the air, however, causes no significant lowering in the respiratory rate until the percentage drops to about 10%. With the increase of oxygen concentration in the atmosphere, the rate of respiration also increases, but this effect is not as accelerating as might be expected. In certain plants, like rice, on removal of oxygen the rate of respiration in terms of total carbon dioxide produced actually increases. This indicates that anaerobic respiration comes into action when oxygen is no longer available and that the plant, if it has to make up for the relative inefficiency of this system, has to respire faster. (2) Effect of Temperature: Like most chemical reactions, the rate of respiration is greatly influenced by temperature. If the rise is at a much higher starting temperature, say between 20° and 30°C, then the Q 10 may fall below 2. In certain cases the rate of respiration increases at lower temperature. increase in the rate of respiration is primarily due to increase in the quantity of respirable materials (such as soluble carbohydrates) which tend to accumulate in Irish potato at temperature slightly above 0°C. -
The Electron Transport Chain in Anaerobically Functioning Eukaryotes
rl BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA II BBt ELSEVIER Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1365 (1998) 71-78 The electron transport chain in anaerobically functioning eukaryotes Aloysius G.M. Tielens*, Jaap J. Van Hellemond Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry and Institute for Biomembranes, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80176, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 27 January 1998; received in revised form 26 February 1998; accepted 2 March 1998 Abstract Many lower eukaryotes can survive anaerobic conditions via a fermentation pathway that involves the use of the reduction of endogenously produced fumarate as electron sink. This fumarate reduction is linked to electron transport in an especially adapted, anaerobically functioning electron-transport chain. An aerobic energy metabolism with Krebs cycle activity is accompanied by electron transfer from succinate to ubiquinone via complex II of the respiratory chain. On the other hand, in an anaerobic metabolism, where fumarate functions as terminal electron acceptor, electrons are transferred from rhodoquinone to fumarate, which is the reversed direction. Ubiquinone cannot replace rhodoquinone in the process of fumarate reduction in vivo, as ubiquinone can only accept electrons from complex II and cannot donate them to fumarate. Rhodoquinone, with its lower redox potential than ubiquinone, is capable of donating electrons to fumarate. Eukaryotic fumarate reductases were shown to interact with rhodoquinone (a benzoquinone), whereas most prokaryotic fumarate reductases interact with the naphtoquinones mena- quinone and demethylmenaquinone. Fumarate reductase, the enzyme essential for the anaerobic functioning of many eukaryotes, is structurally very similar to succinate dehydrogenase, the Krebs cycle enzyme catalysing the reverse reaction. In prokaryotes these enzymes are differentially expressed depending on the external conditions. -
The History of Carbon Monoxide Intoxication
medicina Review The History of Carbon Monoxide Intoxication Ioannis-Fivos Megas 1 , Justus P. Beier 2 and Gerrit Grieb 1,2,* 1 Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhoehe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089 Berlin, Germany; fi[email protected] 2 Burn Center, Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Intoxication with carbon monoxide in organisms needing oxygen has probably existed on Earth as long as fire and its smoke. What was observed in antiquity and the Middle Ages, and usually ended fatally, was first successfully treated in the last century. Since then, diagnostics and treatments have undergone exciting developments, in particular specific treatments such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy. In this review, different historic aspects of the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of carbon monoxide intoxication are described and discussed. Keywords: carbon monoxide; CO intoxication; COHb; inhalation injury 1. Introduction and Overview Intoxication with carbon monoxide in organisms needing oxygen for survival has probably existed on Earth as long as fire and its smoke. Whenever the respiratory tract of living beings comes into contact with the smoke from a flame, CO intoxication and/or in- Citation: Megas, I.-F.; Beier, J.P.; halation injury may take place. Although the therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide has Grieb, G. The History of Carbon also been increasingly studied in recent history [1], the toxic effects historically dominate a Monoxide Intoxication. Medicina 2021, 57, 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ much longer period of time. medicina57050400 As a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas, CO is produced by the incomplete combus- tion of hydrocarbons and poses an invisible danger. -
Biol 1020: Photosynthesis
Chapter 10: Photosynthesis Energy and Carbon Sources Electromagnetic Spectrum and Light Chloroplasts Photosynthesis Overview Light Reactions C3 Cycle Photorespiration Supplemental Carbon Fixation: C4 and CAM pathways . • List and differentiate the 4 possible groups of organisms based on how they obtain energy and useful carbon. Classification by Energy and Carbon Sources energy source chemotrophs can only get energy directly from chemical compounds phototrophs can get energy directly from light (these organisms can use chemical compounds as energy sources as well) . Classification by Energy and Carbon Sources carbon source autotrophs can fix carbon dioxide, thus they can use CO2 as a carbon source heterotrophs cannot fix CO2; they use organic molecules from other organisms as a carbon source . Classification by Energy and Carbon Sources combined, these leads to 4 possible groups: photoautotrophs – carry out photosynthesis use light energy to fix CO2 store energy in chemical bonds of organic molecules includes green plants, algae, and some bacteria photoheterotrophs – use light energy but cannot fix CO2; some nonsulfur purple bacteria chemoautotrophs – obtain energy from reduced inorganic molecules and use some of it to fix CO2; some bacteria chemoheterotrophs – use organic molecules as both carbon and energy sources dependent completely on other organisms for energy capture and carbon fixation includes all animals, all fungi, most protists, and most bacteria . • List and differentiate the 4 possible groups of -
Arenicola Marina During Low Tide
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published June 15 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Sulfide stress and tolerance in the lugworm Arenicola marina during low tide Susanne Volkel, Kerstin Hauschild, Manfred K. Grieshaber Institut fiir Zoologie, Lehrstuhl fur Tierphysiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universitat, Universitatsstr. 1, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany ABSTRACT: In the present study environmental sulfide concentrations in the vicinity of and within burrows of the lugworm Arenicola marina during tidal exposure are presented. Sulfide concentrations in the pore water of the sediment ranged from 0.4 to 252 pM. During 4 h of tidal exposure no significant changes of pore water sulfide concentrations were observed. Up to 32 pM sulfide were measured in the water of lugworm burrows. During 4 h of low tide the percentage of burrows containing sulfide increased from 20 to 50% in July and from 36 to 77% in October A significant increase of median sulfide concentrations from 0 to 14.5 pM was observed after 5 h of emersion. Sulfide and thiosulfate concentrations in the coelomic fluid and succinate, alanopine and strombine levels in the body wall musculature of freshly caught A. marina were measured. During 4 h of tidal exposure in July the percentage of lugworms containing sulfide and maximal sulfide concentrations increased from 17 % and 5.4 pM to 62% and 150 pM, respectively. A significant increase of median sulfide concentrations was observed after 2 and 3 h of emersion. In October, changes of sulfide concentrations were less pronounced. Median thiosulfate concentrations were 18 to 32 FM in July and 7 to 12 ~.IMin October No significant changes were observed during tidal exposure. -
Bioenergetics and Metabolism Mitochondria Chloroplasts
Bioenergetics and metabolism Mitochondria Chloroplasts Peroxisomes B. Balen Chemiosmosis common pathway of mitochondria, chloroplasts and prokaryotes to harness energy for biological purposes → chemiosmotic coupling – ATP synthesis (chemi) + membrane transport (osmosis) Prokaryotes – plasma membrane → ATP production Eukaryotes – plasma membrane → transport processes – membranes of cell compartments – energy-converting organelles → production of ATP • Mitochondria – fungi, animals, plants • Plastids (chloroplasts) – plants The essential requirements for chemiosmosis source of high-energy e- membrane with embedded proton pump and ATP synthase energy from sunlight or the pump harnesses the energy of e- transfer to pump H+→ oxidation of foodstuffs is proton gradient across the membrane used to create H+ gradient + across a membrane H gradient serves as an energy store that can be used to drive ATP synthesis Figures 14-1; 14-2 Molecular Biology of the Cell (© Garland Science 2008) Electron transport processes (A) mitochondrion converts energy from chemical fuels (B) chloroplast converts energy from sunlight → electron-motive force generated by the 2 photosystems enables the chloroplast to drive electron transfer from H2O to carbohydrate → chloroplast electron transfer is opposite of electron transfer in a mitochondrion Figure 14-3 Molecular Biology of the Cell (© Garland Science 2008) Carbohydrate molecules and O2 are products of the chloroplast and inputs for the mitochondrion Figure 2-41; 2-76 Molecular Biology of the Cell (© Garland -
1 [ Reading for Lecture 7] (1) 2Nd Law of Thermodynamics: Entropy
[ Reading for lecture 7] (1) 2nd law of thermodynamics: Entropy Increases Life Decreases it’s own entropy – at the expense of the rest of the universe Most globally – takes photons (low entropy – straight line !) and converts them ultimately into heat (high entropy), with all of life in- between. To do this, life needs to gather, store and manipulate sources of Free-Energy Free energy can be thought of as the “currency” of life. Any reaction that requires free energy input (eg. making DNA from nucleic acids, doing mechanical work, building a protonmotive force) must be “paid for” by coupling to a reaction that releases free energy. This lecture: Types of biological free-energy, ways and mechanisms in which they are interconverted. These processes are essentially what life is. 1 Types of biological free-energy 2 Protonmotive force (pmf) [Protonmotive Force] (3) Electrical potential plus concentration gradient, H+ or “protons”. (see lecture 6) nb. Nernst potential is the voltage when pmf is zero, at equilibrium. Pmf is a measure of how far from equilibrium the membrane is –the “driving force” for proton transport across the membrane. Generated by active transport of protons across the membrane Free-energy sources: absorption of photons, break-down of food. pH gradient (chemical potential) is necessary if the pmf is to do significant work Very few protons need to be pumped to establish the membrane voltage, BUT… Just like charging a battery, you need to provide current as well as voltage. pH gradient also increases the free energy per proton –diffusion as well as voltage drives protons. -
Acute Stimulation of White Adipocyte Respiration by PKA-Induced Lipolysis Einav Yehuda-Shnaidman,1 Ben Buehrer,2 Jingbo Pi,1 Naresh Kumar,3 and Sheila Collins1,4
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Acute Stimulation of White Adipocyte Respiration by PKA-Induced Lipolysis Einav Yehuda-Shnaidman,1 Ben Buehrer,2 Jingbo Pi,1 Naresh Kumar,3 and Sheila Collins1,4 OBJECTIVE—We examined the effect of -adrenergic receptor BAT and WAT is different. Brown adipocytes possess a (AR) activation and cAMP-elevating agents on respiration and rich complement of mitochondria and are the only cell mitochondrial uncoupling in human adipocytes and probed the type to express uncoupling protein (UCP1). After cate- underlying molecular mechanisms. cholamine stimulation of the -adrenergic receptors  RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Oxygen consumption ( ARs), UCP1 activation (by the released FAs) increases rate (OCR, aerobic respiration) and extracellular acidification the proton conductance of the inner mitochondrial mem- rate (ECAR, anaerobic respiration) were examined in response brane (IMM) and dissipates the electrochemical proton to isoproterenol (ISO), forskolin (FSK), and dibutyryl-cAMP gradient that is the driving force for ATP synthesis in a (DB), coupled with measurements of mitochondrial depolariza- process termed “mitochondrial uncoupling” (rev. in 1,2). tion, lipolysis, kinase activities, and gene targeting or knock- Catecholamine stimulation also increases Ucp1 gene ex- down approaches. pression and mitochondrial mass, altogether resulting in RESULTS—ISO, FSK, or DB rapidly increased oxidative and robust oxidation of FAs for heat production and energy glycolytic respiration together with mitochondrial depolarization expenditure. White adipocytes have fewer mitochondria in human and mouse white adipocytes. The increase in OCR was and negligible amounts of UCP1. Upon AR stimulation of oligomycin-insensitive and contingent on cAMP-dependent pro- WAT, FAs liberated by lipolysis are mostly released into tein kinase A (PKA)-induced lipolysis. -
Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria's Response to Extreme Ph Environments and the Effect of Their Activities on Microbial Corrosion
applied sciences Review Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria’s Response to Extreme pH Environments and the Effect of Their Activities on Microbial Corrosion Thi Thuy Tien Tran 1 , Krishnan Kannoorpatti 1,* , Anna Padovan 2 and Suresh Thennadil 1 1 Energy and Resources Institute, College of Engineering, Information Technology and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia; [email protected] (T.T.T.T.); [email protected] (S.T.) 2 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, College of Engineering, Information Technology and Environment, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are dominant species causing corrosion of various types of materials. However, they also play a beneficial role in bioremediation due to their tolerance of extreme pH conditions. The application of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in bioremediation and control methods for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in extreme pH environments requires an understanding of the microbial activities in these conditions. Recent studies have found that in order to survive and grow in high alkaline/acidic condition, SRB have developed several strategies to combat the environmental challenges. The strategies mainly include maintaining pH homeostasis in the cytoplasm and adjusting metabolic activities leading to changes in environmental pH. The change in pH of the environment and microbial activities in such conditions can have a Citation: Tran, T.T.T.; Kannoorpatti, significant impact on the microbial corrosion of materials. These bacteria strategies to combat extreme K.; Padovan, A.; Thennadil, S. pH environments and their effect on microbial corrosion are presented and discussed. -
Biotransformation: Basic Concepts (1)
Chapter 5 Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Elimination of Toxics Biotransformation: Basic Concepts (1) • Renal excretion of chemicals Biotransformation: Basic Concepts (2) • Biological basis for xenobiotic metabolism: – To convert lipid-soluble, non-polar, non-excretable forms of chemicals to water-soluble, polar forms that are excretable in bile and urine. – The transformation process may take place as a result of the interaction of the toxic substance with enzymes found primarily in the cell endoplasmic reticulum, cytoplasm, and mitochondria. – The liver is the primary organ where biotransformation occurs. Biotransformation: Basic Concepts (3) Biotransformation: Basic Concepts (4) • Interaction with these enzymes may change the toxicant to either a less or a more toxic form. • Generally, biotransformation occurs in two phases. – Phase I involves catabolic reactions that break down the toxicant into various components. • Catabolic reactions include oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis. – Oxidation occurs when a molecule combines with oxygen, loses hydrogen, or loses one or more electrons. – Reduction occurs when a molecule combines with hydrogen, loses oxygen, or gains one or more electrons. – Hydrolysis is the process in which a chemical compound is split into smaller molecules by reacting with water. • In most cases these reactions make the chemical less toxic, more water soluble, and easier to excrete. Biotransformation: Basic Concepts (5) – Phase II reactions involves the binding of molecules to either the original toxic molecule or the toxic molecule metabolite derived from the Phase I reactions. The final product is usually water soluble and, therefore, easier to excrete from the body. • Phase II reactions include glucuronidation, sulfation, acetylation, methylation, conjugation with glutathione, and conjugation with amino acids (such as glycine, taurine, and glutamic acid). -
Anomalies in Coral Reef Community Metabolism and Their Potential Importance in the Reef CO2 Source-Sink Debate
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 6566–6569, May 1998 Population Biology Anomalies in coral reef community metabolism and their potential importance in the reef CO2 source-sink debate JOHN R. M. CHISHOLM* AND DAVID J. BARNES Australian Institute of Marine Science, Private Mail Bag No. 3, Mail Centre, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia Communicated by Andrew A. Benson, University of California, San Diego, CA, March 20, 1998 (received for review September 23, 1997) ABSTRACT It is not certain whether coral reefs are ratio of photosynthesis to respiration on unperturbed reefs sources of or sinks for atmospheric CO2. Air–sea exchange of over 24 h is considered to be close to unity (10). CO2 over reefs has been measured directly and inferred from In March 1996, we made an expedition to Lizard Island, changes in the seawater carbonate equilibrium. Such mea- northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Fig. 1), to measure surements have provided conflicting results. We provide changes in the O2 concentration and pH of seawater flowing community metabolic data that indicate that large changes in across a 300-m section of the reef flat by using a floating CO2 concentration can occur in coral reef waters via biogeo- instrument package (11–14). Measurements were made in chemical processes not directly associated with photosynthe- March when tides permitted the instrument package to float sis, respiration, calcification, and CaCO3 dissolution. These freely over the reef flat, a short distance above the benthos. processes can significantly distort estimates of reef calcifica- On arriving at Lizard Island, we encountered environmental tion and net productivity and obscure the contribution of coral conditions that we had not anticipated.