Isolation of Chemotactic Sulfate Reducing Bacteria
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
July 31, 2007 Ana Gutiérrez-Preciado Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Microbial Diversity Course Marine Biological Laboratories, Woods Hole, MA Isolation of chemotactic sulfate reducing bacteria. Abstract Different enrichments are used to isolate sulfate reducers using H2, lactate, butaryte and ethanol as electron donors. Pure cultures were never obtained. Sulfate reducers were always obtain as well as acetogenes. This could be because the sulfate reducers that are being isolated need acetate to reduce sulfate. Chemotaxis Assays were used in order to get insights of which electron donors and electron acceptor are preferred by the isolated sulfate reducers. Finally, enrichment for iron reducers was made and inoculated with our sulfate reducers culture. Growth was present in the iron media, but whether these organisms are iron reducers remains to be determined. Introduction Sulfate is the most oxidized form of Sulfur, is one of the major anions in water and is used by sulfate reducing bacteria a group that is phylogenetically widespread. The end product of sulfate reduction is H2S (1). Many organisms (plants, algae, fungi and most bacteria) use assimilative sulfate reduction to form sulfide to get sulfur as a source for biosynthesis (i.e., synthesize amino acids). The ability to use sulfate as an electron acceptor for energy-generating processes, however, involves the large-scale reduction of 2- SO4 , which is restricted to sulfate reducers. In dissimilative sulfate reduction, sulfide is excreted (1). H2, lactate, and pyruvate are widely used as electron donors by a variety of sulfate reducers, whilst other electron donors, such as, ethanol (and other alcohols), fumarate, malate, choline, acetate, propionate, butyrate, long-chain fatty acids, benzoate, indole and hexadecane have more restricted use (1). (Figure taken from (1)) Due to the high concentration of sulfate in seawater, sulfate reducers play a dominant role in the complete degradation of organic matter in anaerobic marine systems. Phylogenetically, the sulfate reducers are found among the δ Proteobacteria (Desulfovibrio spp.), Archaea (Archeoglobus spp.) and Clostridium-Bacillus subphylum (Desulfotomaculum spp.). Questions: 2- 2- 0 1. What are the bacteria sensing? SO4 ? SO3 ? S2O3? S ? H2S? 2. Are these compounds chemoattractant? Or chemorepelent? 3. Which electron donors are chemoattractant? Lactate? H2? Butyrate? Ethanol? Acetate? 4. If I get any sulfate reducers… 4.1. Are they also Iron reducers? Sampling For the enrichments we already have of sulfate reducers (Group 4), a sample was taken from Trunk River on Jun 19th, 2007, in the deep sediments. Enrichment The sample that was taken contained ~15 cm of water and ~15 of sediments in depth. Samples from the sediment were taken to look for anaerobic organisms. The enrichments were settled with marine water and with two electron donors: H2 and methanol. Six enrichments were done with seawater media with: 1. H2 + CO2 2. H2 + CO2 +BES 3. H2 + CO2 +Na2SO4 4. MeOH 5. MeOH + BES 6. MeOH + Na2SO4 Enrichments will be monitored periodically for the production of methane (by Gas Chromatography) and acetate (via HPLC). The production of sulfide will be detected by a chemical assay or by Hydrogen Sulfide Microsensors (Unisense). Basal anaerobic modular seawater medium (see lab manual Microbial Diversity 2007). Only the 3rd enrichment was used, because it is enriching for sulfate reducers. Isolation of pure cultures Isolation of these organisms was done by two approaches. First, plating in Agar plates with the media described above. As a second approach, we employed plating the 3rd media on a solid surface. Silica plates were chosen since agar is not useful substrate for direct plating of marine samples (because of the prevalence of agar-degrading organisms). These plates were incubated under strictly anaerobic conditions in a custom built anaerobic incubator at 30°C. Characterization of isolated organisms Characterization will be done in three ways: 1. 12 isolated bacterial colonies will be chosen from the silica plates. 16S rRNA sequences will be determined via PCR amplification (2) and sequencing. Phylogenetic relationships will be determined with ARB (3). 2. Different substrates will be provided to the bacteria to see which the best for its growth is. Test for elector donors, such as Lactate, Butyrate and Ethanol will be made. 3. Chemotaxis Assays (described below) Chemotaxis Assays In chemotaxis assays, glass capillaries are loaded with defined substrate solutions, inserted in a suspension of motile microorganisms, and the accumulation of cells at the opening of or within the capillary is monitored by direct or indirect methods (4). This new modified method described by Overmann J (see ref (4)) was used for parallel testing of a large number of different chemoattractants within the same bacterial sample. Flat rectangular glass capillaries with a length of 50 mm, an inside diameter of 0.1 x 1.0 mm, and a capacity of 5 µl (Vitrocom, Mountain Lakes, NJ) were used for looking at the microscope. These capillaries fit exactly into the opening of the chemotaxis chamber (that consists of a bottle that can be filled with 20 ml of the sample and is closed with plasticine for anoxic incubations). The specific geometry of these capillaries permits a direct light microscopic examination of their contents (4). In this case, glass capillaries will be loaded with the propionate, butyrate, lacatate 2- and ethanol as electron donors. Electron acceptors, such as sulfate (SO4 ), were also tested. Additionally, elemental sulfur (S0) as well as taurine, cysteine and thiosulfate were tested. Stock solutions of these test substrates were prepared at a concentration of 100 mM. These solutions were sterilized by filtering them in the anaerobic chamber. Posterior dilutions were made in order to have the chemoattractants at a final concentration of 1 mM. Capillaries are filled with diluted test substances by capillary action, sealed at one end with plasticine (Idena, Berlin, Germany), and inserted directly into the microscopic chamber so that their open ends extend well into the sample. This creates a gradient of the tested compound. At least two parallels will be used per substrate, one flat capillary for direct. Each chemotaxis assay also comprises two control capillaries, which are filled with sterile culture supernatant or sample water. This technique permits a rapid screening of a limited number of chemoattractants. For more details on this technique, see ref (4). Results 12 colonies were picked from silica and agar plates and transfer into sea water based medium with NaSO4 and a head space of H2/CO2. silica plate agar plate Only one tube grew from a colony I picked from Group 3 agar plate. The original sample was taken from Trunk River. The “pure” culture was observed at the microscope revealing two cell types: HPLC analysis revealed that they were producing acetate: The 15.537 peak indicates acetate presence at a 24.551 mM concentration. This indicates presence of acetogenes in the culture. The 14.310 peak indicates formate presence. This makes sense because formate is an intermediate of the acetyl CoA pathway. The concentration of the formate was not determined. Cells were lysed by the freeze thaw method and PCR amplification of the 16 S rRNA region was done using the 8F and 1492R primers (5). Since different cell types were observed, a clone library was made out of this DNA using the invitrogen TOPO TA cloning kit. Sequencing was done at the Mitch Sogin lab. Returned sequences reveal that no sulfate reducers were present in this culture, but rather only acetogenes were found. This tree was constructed by Maximum Likelihood using the ARB software (3). These five sequences belong to three different acetogenes, as revealed by neighbor joining similarity matrices using the ARB software (3): 5 A06 D06 1.000000 E05 0.983968 0.982533 E06 0.998127 0.998148 0.985915 H06 0.984252 0.982906 1.000000 0.986193 D06 is equal to A06, and H06 is equal to E06. No chemotaxis assay was performed with this culture Since there was no detectable growth on the “pure” culture tubes, I sampled again Trunk River and Sippewissett. Trunk River: Sippewissett: Chemotaxis assays were performed using the first two environmental samples from Trunk River and the first one from Sippewissett. The capillary tubes were use to extract the cells and lyse them using the freeze thaw protocol for further 16S rRNA PCR amplification (5). Micrographs from Chemotactic Assay on Trunk River environmental sample: Control capillary tube Taurine capillary tube Cyano present in ALL capillary Sulphur capillary tube tubes Enrichments The Basal anaerobic modular seawater medium was slightly modified. Ferrous sulfate was used instead of sodium sulfate. The only reducing agent used was cysteine, and it was added doubling the amount described in the lab manual Microbial Diversity 2007. Three different media of this kind was made, by varying the electron donors: lactate, butyrate and ethanol. Ferrous sulfate changes colour when sulfate is reduced to sulfide. So we chose this because colour will indicate us growth. The problem we found was that some environmental samples already contained sulfide, changing the color of the enrichment immediately after inoculation: Since tubes are incubated horizontally (to increase the surface of contact with the H2/CO2 headspace), tubes were vigorously shaking and let them precipitate for half an hour and then look for growth: