Catabolism: Energy Release and Conservation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nitrobacter As an Indicator of Toxicity in Wastewater
State Water Survey Division WATER QUALITY SECTION AT Illinois Department of PEORIA, ILLINOIS Energy and Natural Resources SWS Contract Report 326 NITROBACTER AS AN INDICATOR OF TOXICITY IN WASTEWATER by Wuncheng Wang and Paula Reed Prepared for and funded by the Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources September 1983 CONTENTS PAGE Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Scope of study 3 Acknowledgments 3 Literature review 3 Microbial nitrification 3 Influence of toxicants on nitrification 5 Materials and methods 10 Culture 10 Methods 11 Results 12 Preliminary tests 13 Metal toxicity 13 Organic compounds toxicity 16 Time effect 22 Discussion 22 References 27 NITROBACTER AS AN INDICATOR OF TOXICITY IN WASTEWATER by Wuncheng Wang and Paula Reed ABSTRACT This report presents the results of a study of the use of Nitrobacter as an indicator of toxicity. Nitrobacter are strictly aerobic, autotrophic, and slow growing bacteria. Because they convert nitrite to nitrate, the effects that toxins have on them can be detected easily by monitoring changes in their nitrite consumption rate. The bacterial cultures were obtained from two sources — the Peoria and Princeton (Illinois) wastewater treatment plants — and tests were con• ducted to determine the effects on the cultures of inorganic ions and organic compounds. The inorganic ions included cadmium, copper, lead, and nickel. The organic compounds were phenol, chlorophenol (three derivatives), dichlo- rophenol (two derivatives), and trichlorophenol. The bioassay procedure is relatively simple and the results are repro• ducible . The effects of these chemical compounds on Nitrobacter were not dramatic. For example, of the compounds tested, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol was the most toxic to Nitrobacter. -
The Switch from Fermentation to Respiration in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is Regulated by the Ert1 Transcriptional Activator/Repressor
INVESTIGATION The Switch from Fermentation to Respiration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Regulated by the Ert1 Transcriptional Activator/Repressor Najla Gasmi,* Pierre-Etienne Jacques,† Natalia Klimova,† Xiao Guo,§ Alessandra Ricciardi,§ François Robert,†,** and Bernard Turcotte*,‡,§,1 ‡Department of Medicine, *Department of Biochemistry, and §Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1A1, †Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada H2W 1R7, and **Département de Médecine, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7 ABSTRACT In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, fermentation is the major pathway for energy production, even under aerobic conditions. However, when glucose becomes scarce, ethanol produced during fermentation is used as a carbon source, requiring a shift to respiration. This adaptation results in massive reprogramming of gene expression. Increased expression of genes for gluconeogenesis and the glyoxylate cycle is observed upon a shift to ethanol and, conversely, expression of some fermentation genes is reduced. The zinc cluster proteins Cat8, Sip4, and Rds2, as well as Adr1, have been shown to mediate this reprogramming of gene expression. In this study, we have characterized the gene YBR239C encoding a putative zinc cluster protein and it was named ERT1 (ethanol regulated transcription factor 1). ChIP-chip analysis showed that Ert1 binds to a limited number of targets in the presence of glucose. The strongest enrichment was observed at the promoter of PCK1 encoding an important gluconeogenic enzyme. With ethanol as the carbon source, enrichment was observed with many additional genes involved in gluconeogenesis and mitochondrial function. Use of lacZ reporters and quantitative RT-PCR analyses demonstrated that Ert1 regulates expression of its target genes in a manner that is highly redundant with other regulators of gluconeogenesis. -
Amphibolic Nature of Krebs Cycle
Amphibolic nature of Krebs Cycle How what we are is what we eat • In aerobic organisms, the citric acid cycle is an amphibolic pathway, one that serves in both catabolic and anabolic processes. • Since the citric acid does both synthesis (anabolic) and breakdown (catabolic) activities, it is called an amphibolic pathway • The citric acid cycle is amphibolic (i.e it is both anabolic and catabolic in its function). • It is said to be an AMPHIBOLIC pathway, because it functions in both degradative or catabolic and biosynthetic or anabolic reactions (amphi = both) A central metabolic pathway or amphibolic pathway is a set of reactions which permit the interconversion of several metabolites, and represents the end of the catabolism and the beginning of anabolism • The KREBS CYCLE or citric acid cycle is a series of reactions that degrades acetyl CoA to yield carbon dioxide, and energy, which is used to produce NADH, H+ and FADH. • The KREBS CYCLE connects the catabolic pathways that begin with the digestion and degradation of foods in stages 1 and 2 with the oxidation of substrates in stage 3 that generates most of the energy for ATP synthesis. • The citric acid cycle is the final common pathway in the oxidation of fuel molecules. In stage 3 of metabolism, citric acid is a final common catabolic intermediate in the form of acetylCoA. • This is why the citric acid cycle is called a central metabolic pathway. Anaplerosis and Cataplerosis Anaplerosis is a series of enzymatic reactions in which metabolic intermediates enter the citric acid cycle from the cytosol. Cataplerosis is the opposite, a process where intermediates leave the citric acid cycle and enter the cytosol. -
Comparing Aerobic Vs. Anaerobic Respiration
Comparing Aerobic vs. Anaerobic Respiration Objective: Students will compare the two types of cellular respiration: aerobic respiration and anaerobic respiration (fermentation). Students will note similarities and differences between the two processes including when, where, and how each process occurs. Students will develop a concept map using Inspiration indicating the criteria for aerobic and anaerobic respiration. This concept map will indicate: Three similarities between the two processes. Two types of cells that perform each process. Location in the cell where each process occurs. Oxygen requirements for each process. Reactants and products for each process. Energy output for each process. Two different types of anaerobic respiration. Reactants and products for each. Types of cells that perform each process. Introduction: This activity will follow a fermentation (anaerobic respiration) lab using yeast. This lab will address the process of alcoholic fermentation. Students will perform push-ups to experience lactic acid build-up in muscle cells. These activities will gain interest in the process of anaerobic respiration. Students will have already studied the detailed process of aerobic cellular respiration. Procedure: Students will work in pairs or trios to answer questions (as seen in benchmarks) on aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Students will use previous notes and lab activities to summarize main ideas for aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Individually, students will create a concept map using Inspiration to further integrate and separate the two processes. Accommodations: Instructions will be provided in written format as well as read orally. Instructions will also be on an overhead. One example will be provided for students on how to summarize data. -
Glycolysis/Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas Pathway (EMP Pathway)
Reaspiration iving cells require a continuous supply of energy for maintaining various life activities. This energy is obtained by oxidizing the organic compounds (carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids) Lin the cells. This process of harvesting chemical energy for metabolic activities in the form of ATP by oxidising the food molecules is called ‘respiration’. The most common substrate used in respiration for oxidation is glucose. Factor affecting the respiration (1) Oxygen Content of the Atmosphere: The percentage of oxygen in the surrounding atmosphere greatly influence the rate of respiration. But reduction of the oxygen content of the air, however, causes no significant lowering in the respiratory rate until the percentage drops to about 10%. With the increase of oxygen concentration in the atmosphere, the rate of respiration also increases, but this effect is not as accelerating as might be expected. In certain plants, like rice, on removal of oxygen the rate of respiration in terms of total carbon dioxide produced actually increases. This indicates that anaerobic respiration comes into action when oxygen is no longer available and that the plant, if it has to make up for the relative inefficiency of this system, has to respire faster. (2) Effect of Temperature: Like most chemical reactions, the rate of respiration is greatly influenced by temperature. If the rise is at a much higher starting temperature, say between 20° and 30°C, then the Q 10 may fall below 2. In certain cases the rate of respiration increases at lower temperature. increase in the rate of respiration is primarily due to increase in the quantity of respirable materials (such as soluble carbohydrates) which tend to accumulate in Irish potato at temperature slightly above 0°C. -
Exam #2 Review
Exam #2 Review Exam #2 will cover all the material that has been presented in class since Exam #1 and up through the metabolism introduction. This includes eukaryotic cell structure / function, transport, the closed system growth curve, enzymes and the introduction to metabolism. As always, it is best to begin by studying your notes and then after you feel your study is complete, take some time to look through this review. I. Eukaryotic cell structure / function A. There is a great deal of variance among eukaryotic cells - from protozoan cells to yeast cells to human cells. Fungi and protists (classically split into algae and protozoa) are eukaryotic representatives of the microbial world. B. Structure of the eukaryotic cell. 1. Cytoskeleton - provides structure and shape of cell, three components: a. Microtubules - largest element of cytoskeleton, composed of hollow cylinders of tubulin, form mitotic spindles, cilia and flagella and cell “highways”. b. Microfilaments - smallest element of cytoskeleton, composed of actin, involved in motion (pseudopod formation). c. Intermediate filaments - very stable structural element, play a supportive role, composed of proteins including keratin. Practice: Microfilaments a. are a component of the cytoskeleton. b. are long, twisted polymers of a protein called actin. c. form eukaryotic flagella. d. are made of tubulin. e. a and b f. c and d 2. Nucleus a. Bound by both an inner and outer membrane. The space between the two membranes is called the perinuclear space. The membrane has large nuclear pores through which proteins can pass (Why is this important?) b. Linear pieces of DNA are packaged by wrapping one and three quarters times around a histone octamer to form a core particle. -
Anoxygenic Photosynthesis in Photolithotrophic Sulfur Bacteria and Their Role in Detoxication of Hydrogen Sulfide
antioxidants Review Anoxygenic Photosynthesis in Photolithotrophic Sulfur Bacteria and Their Role in Detoxication of Hydrogen Sulfide Ivan Kushkevych 1,* , Veronika Bosáková 1,2 , Monika Vítˇezová 1 and Simon K.-M. R. Rittmann 3,* 1 Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (M.V.) 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic 3 Archaea Physiology & Biotechnology Group, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Universität Wien, 1090 Vienna, Austria * Correspondence: [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (S.K.-M.R.R.); Tel.: +420-549-495-315 (I.K.); +431-427-776-513 (S.K.-M.R.R.) Abstract: Hydrogen sulfide is a toxic compound that can affect various groups of water microorgan- isms. Photolithotrophic sulfur bacteria including Chromatiaceae and Chlorobiaceae are able to convert inorganic substrate (hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide) into organic matter deriving energy from photosynthesis. This process takes place in the absence of molecular oxygen and is referred to as anoxygenic photosynthesis, in which exogenous electron donors are needed. These donors may be reduced sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide. This paper deals with the description of this metabolic process, representatives of the above-mentioned families, and discusses the possibility using anoxygenic phototrophic microorganisms for the detoxification of toxic hydrogen sulfide. Moreover, their general characteristics, morphology, metabolism, and taxonomy are described as Citation: Kushkevych, I.; Bosáková, well as the conditions for isolation and cultivation of these microorganisms will be presented. V.; Vítˇezová,M.; Rittmann, S.K.-M.R. -
7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: the “METABOLISM” of ECOSYSTEMS
7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: THE “METABOLISM” OF ECOSYSTEMS Ecologists use the term “productivity” to refer to the process through which an assemblage of organisms (e.g. a trophic level or ecosystem assimilates carbon. Primary producers (autotrophs) do this through photosynthesis; Secondary producers (heterotrophs) do it through the assimilation of the organic carbon in their food. Remember that all organic carbon in the food web is ultimately derived from primary production. DEFINITIONS Primary Productivity: Rate of conversion of CO2 to organic carbon (photosynthesis) per unit surface area of the earth, expressed either in terns of weight of carbon, or the equivalent calories e.g., g C m-2 year-1 Kcal m-2 year-1 Primary Production: Same as primary productivity, but usually expressed for a whole ecosystem e.g., tons year-1 for a lake, cornfield, forest, etc. NET vs. GROSS: For plants: Some of the organic carbon generated in plants through photosynthesis (using solar energy) is oxidized back to CO2 (releasing energy) through the respiration of the plants – RA. Gross Primary Production: (GPP) = Total amount of CO2 reduced to organic carbon by the plants per unit time Autotrophic Respiration: (RA) = Total amount of organic carbon that is respired (oxidized to CO2) by plants per unit time Net Primary Production (NPP) = GPP – RA The amount of organic carbon produced by plants that is not consumed by their own respiration. It is the increase in the plant biomass in the absence of herbivores. For an entire ecosystem: Some of the NPP of the plants is consumed (and respired) by herbivores and decomposers and oxidized back to CO2 (RH). -
Novel Industrial Bioprocesses for Production of Key Valuable Steroid Precursors from Phytosterol
Novel industrial bioprocesses for production of key valuable steroid precursors from phytosterol Project acronym: MySterI (Mycobacterial Steroids for Industry) Project no: EIB.12.010 Name: Carlos Barreiro ERA‐IB‐2 final conference, Berlin, 16./17.02.2016 Project partners 2 Research Centres 2 Universities 1 SME 1 Large Enterprise Project acronym: MySterI ERA‐IB‐2 Final conference, Berlin, 16./17.02.2016 www.era‐ib.net P1: INBIOTEC Project partners • P1: COORDINATOR: Asociación de investigación‐ INBIOTEC‐Instituto de Biotecnología de León (Research Centre). León (Spain). • Dr. Carlos Barreiro, Dr. Antonio Rodríguez‐García, Dr. Alberto Sola‐Landa MySterI tasks of INBOTEC: ‐Genome sequencing Mycobacterium sp NRRL B‐3805 ‐Genome mining and annotation ‐Transcriptomics (microarrays, RNAseq) ‐Proteomics (secretome analysis) • Total project budget: 93 000 € Project acronym: MySterI ERA‐IB‐2 Final conference, Berlin, 16./17.02.2016 www.era‐ib.net P2: Pharmins ltd. Project partners • P2: Pharmins Ltd. (SME) Pushchino (Russian Federation) • Dr. Marina Donova MySterI tasks of Pharmins: ‐Genome sequencing Mycobacterium sp NRRL B‐3805 ‐Biochemical characterization of proteins ‐Sterol conversion by modified mycobacterial strains ‐Two‐steps fermentation to obtain 11‐α‐OH‐AD ‐Modification of 11α‐hydroxylase enzymes • Total project budget: 123 743 € Project acronym: MySterI ERA‐IB‐2 Final conference, Berlin, 16./17.02.2016 www.era‐ib.net P3: University of York Project partners • P3: University of York (University) York (UK) • Professor Maggie Smith, Dr Jessica Loraine MySterI tasks of U. of York: ‐Genome sequencing Mycobacterium sp NRRL B‐3805 ‐Genetic tools and strain development ‐Development of DNA transformation procedures ‐Development of gene knock‐out techniques ‐Development of promoters to control gene expression • Total project budget: 312 246€ Project acronym: MySterI ERA‐IB‐2 Final conference, Berlin, 16./17.02.2016 www.era‐ib.net P4: Stiftelsen SINTEF Project partners • P4: Stiftelsen SINTEF (Research centre). -
The Electron Transport Chain in Anaerobically Functioning Eukaryotes
rl BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA II BBt ELSEVIER Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1365 (1998) 71-78 The electron transport chain in anaerobically functioning eukaryotes Aloysius G.M. Tielens*, Jaap J. Van Hellemond Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry and Institute for Biomembranes, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80176, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 27 January 1998; received in revised form 26 February 1998; accepted 2 March 1998 Abstract Many lower eukaryotes can survive anaerobic conditions via a fermentation pathway that involves the use of the reduction of endogenously produced fumarate as electron sink. This fumarate reduction is linked to electron transport in an especially adapted, anaerobically functioning electron-transport chain. An aerobic energy metabolism with Krebs cycle activity is accompanied by electron transfer from succinate to ubiquinone via complex II of the respiratory chain. On the other hand, in an anaerobic metabolism, where fumarate functions as terminal electron acceptor, electrons are transferred from rhodoquinone to fumarate, which is the reversed direction. Ubiquinone cannot replace rhodoquinone in the process of fumarate reduction in vivo, as ubiquinone can only accept electrons from complex II and cannot donate them to fumarate. Rhodoquinone, with its lower redox potential than ubiquinone, is capable of donating electrons to fumarate. Eukaryotic fumarate reductases were shown to interact with rhodoquinone (a benzoquinone), whereas most prokaryotic fumarate reductases interact with the naphtoquinones mena- quinone and demethylmenaquinone. Fumarate reductase, the enzyme essential for the anaerobic functioning of many eukaryotes, is structurally very similar to succinate dehydrogenase, the Krebs cycle enzyme catalysing the reverse reaction. In prokaryotes these enzymes are differentially expressed depending on the external conditions. -
Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-Rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/428698; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M. Ward1,2,3*, Airi Idei4, Mayuko Nakagawa2,5, Yuichiro Ueno2,5,6, Woodward W. 4 Fischer3, Shawn E. McGlynn2* 5 6 1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 7 2. Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8550, Japan 8 3. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9 91125 USA 10 4. Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, 11 Japan 12 5. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 13 152-8551, Japan 14 6. Department of Subsurface Geobiological Analysis and Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth 15 Science and Technology, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan 16 Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] 17 18 Abstract 19 Hydrothermal systems, including terrestrial hot springs, contain diverse and systematic 20 arrays of geochemical conditions that vary over short spatial scales due to progressive interaction 21 between the reducing hydrothermal fluids, the oxygenated atmosphere, and in some cases 22 seawater. At Jinata Onsen, on Shikinejima Island, Japan, an intertidal, anoxic, iron- and 23 hydrogen-rich hot spring mixes with the oxygenated atmosphere and sulfate-rich seawater over 24 short spatial scales, creating an enormous range of redox environments over a distance ~10 m. -
Biol 1020: Photosynthesis
Chapter 10: Photosynthesis Energy and Carbon Sources Electromagnetic Spectrum and Light Chloroplasts Photosynthesis Overview Light Reactions C3 Cycle Photorespiration Supplemental Carbon Fixation: C4 and CAM pathways . • List and differentiate the 4 possible groups of organisms based on how they obtain energy and useful carbon. Classification by Energy and Carbon Sources energy source chemotrophs can only get energy directly from chemical compounds phototrophs can get energy directly from light (these organisms can use chemical compounds as energy sources as well) . Classification by Energy and Carbon Sources carbon source autotrophs can fix carbon dioxide, thus they can use CO2 as a carbon source heterotrophs cannot fix CO2; they use organic molecules from other organisms as a carbon source . Classification by Energy and Carbon Sources combined, these leads to 4 possible groups: photoautotrophs – carry out photosynthesis use light energy to fix CO2 store energy in chemical bonds of organic molecules includes green plants, algae, and some bacteria photoheterotrophs – use light energy but cannot fix CO2; some nonsulfur purple bacteria chemoautotrophs – obtain energy from reduced inorganic molecules and use some of it to fix CO2; some bacteria chemoheterotrophs – use organic molecules as both carbon and energy sources dependent completely on other organisms for energy capture and carbon fixation includes all animals, all fungi, most protists, and most bacteria . • List and differentiate the 4 possible groups of