This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 30 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK

The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Jewish Cultures

Laurence Roth, Nadia Valman

Literary Studies

Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 Marc Caplan Published online on: 15 Sep 2014

How to cite :- Marc Caplan. 15 Sep 2014, Literary Studies from: The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Jewish Cultures Routledge Accessed on: 30 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203497470.ch3

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT

Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms

This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 F3hm) ytesm oe,we osdrn h otmoaysuyo eihliterature, Jewish of study contemporary the considering when must token, one same the By 8F03.html). o eihClueadSine nBri.Tog hswsthe was this Though Berlin. in Science) primarily and Culture As Jewish for Scriptures. Hebrew the text: Jewish a originally was the institutions, what ecclesiastical (Christian) with begins such igmvst h oa o os a oy oaki ekosayhn bu iaet truck cigarette a about anything knows he if ask 401. to route Tony, Fat on boss, hijacked mob local the visits Wiggum in rcntuto,o ainlcluetne ni h ae16st ou nteideological the on concrete focus exten- to more 1960s an any late as as the study culture modern until literary tended national in culture of a literature national function of of of The creation construction, study integral nation-imagining). or the an the sion, (or in was and nation-building act Yiddish outset, in an or very exercise constitutive Hebrew the as comparison, as from by such was Israel, languages culture Hebrew In Jewish academic forms. in of literary literature component modern modern or of ideology, study political the the American life, extended Studies. often everyday nonetheless of American 1970s practice African and 1960s and the of Jewish minority Latino during American restricting legacy in Studies among quotas Jewish growth consciousness in of analogous ethnic divisions lifting of academic an the growth parallels to the this response as a well groups; as constitutes hiring, and and 1970s, enrollment and Christian, 1960s the implicitly from often thought general, Jewish from within distinct strains non-rational languages heresy. with or vernacular it along messianism, in German), one, mysticism, conducted (or as rabbinic Maimonides, Ladino culture such and or Jewish or Rashi Yiddish contemporary as Christian as Jewish such of thinkers a such classical exclusion Jewish on than deliberate medieval and the primarily rather Midrash, to focusing and focus, Talmud by as historicist preoccupations such a texts and presumptions with previous culture replicated Jewish inquiry of academic study an as the Studies of Jewish replicated establishment Yale 1819 of and the institutionalization Harvard with as began modern such The colleges American requirements. pioneering these and Hebrew, Biblical of study “ hr sa al psd of episode early an is There eiiaeBusinessmen Legitimate nteAeia cdm,teetbiheto eihSuisdprmnsadprograms and departments Studies Jewish of establishment the academy, American the In fi isncatdsJudentums des Wissenschaft s ask, rst “ IEAYSTUDIES LITERARY hti literature? is What “ ’ What oilClub. Social s h Simpsons The ’ truck? a s yfcsn nJws eiiu utr ahrta the than rather culture religious Jewish on focusing by ” acCaplan Marc fi rmahsoia esetv,tesuyo ieaueas literature of study the perspective, historical a From ” s uoenuieste eeddctdi att the to part in dedicated were universities European rst eenfrClu n isncatdsJudentums des Wissenschaft und Cultur für Verein ” n a hl etnsbrtee oieChief Police there, bar tends he while day One nwihBr ae o tama a at job a takes Bart which in a oycgl ele (www.snpp.com/episodes/ replies cagily Tony Fat 3 47 “ eiiu studies religious fi s raiainddctdt the to dedicated organization rst ” departments fi agu,the hangout, a — ae mostly dates (Society — Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 hmwr ietyivle ntepeaaino h volume the of preparation the in involved directly were whom n ftems biu n retted odvlpi h aeo eihStudies Jewish of wake the in develop to trends urgent and obvious most the of One (1914 Goldin Judah by edited anthology an is period study this the in century twentieth Studies the national of much other e for of often therefore, aesthetic cultures texts US, the the Jewish academic than or of the rather Israel project, in in Whether national contemporaneously literatures. the institutionalized to usefulness being purported criteria its literature, of functions icpiaye disciplinary ugs ro ote17s erwhdbe tde nAeia n uoenuniversities Jewishness European the and to connection American no in with studied sometimes Studies, (the been Biblical of had of perspective Hebrew a 1970s, from primarily the to Prior guages. pknlnug.Teipc ndapr eihcncoseso h 97SxDyWar Six-Day 1967 the of consciousness Jewish diaspora intensi on radically impact which The language. spoken erigwr tl e n setal netd ubro vnsadted aeintervened have trends higher and the of events how institutions of for to number account Jews A that untested. of of then essentially access consideration since and unrestricted unlimited new the the still and both were academy, when learning the moment, within historical perspective. culture their Jewish of Jewish professed products a as from them or identify languages Jewish in written drama or poetry, lyric di far rlxt n perplexity. and prolixity e be could that the receive to contributors his writer of Hebrew most and the only Goldin on what the Clearly, meditation date Israel. two-page of (to State a Agnon contribu- the is one of Y. literature) context The Sh. yeshiva. in author, Lithuanian Prize the belletristic liturgical Nobel of a medieval culture by the Hellenists, and tion Jewish storytelling, and among historiography, thought Spinoza on revelation Hasidic mysticism, essays of Jewish are classical concept entirely fact, poetry, not the in but uprising, of, comments); consists Maccabean introductory collection the the by What also taken Hebrew. tion under- read ten could to whom taught of he none seminar 1960s, a late explains, for he the reader introduction in the course University in a Yale Elsewhere as at life students began graduate collection this volume, Expression upsso hti eeal aldliterature called generally sion. is what of purposes aec n rnnito fmdr erwaahoitclyfrltria purposes liturgical the for adopt anachronistically to Hebrew programs modern pedagogy of religious pronunciation and and synagogues cadence diaspora many prompted example, eak aeue h word the used have I remarks oenHbe ieauesann rmisoiiswt edl ohrSforim Mocher Mendele with origins its from o spanning 1835 volume c. This Abramovitsh, literature 1975). Y. (Alter (Sh. Alter Hebrew Robert by modern translated and edited anthology in tainly lvto fmdr erwltrtr a h 95pbiainof publication 1975 the was literature Hebrew modern of elevation ersnaie n xeln,dcmn lutaigtemjrted nAeia Jewish American in trends major the illustrating document excellent, and representative, A omk hsosraini o ocnenGli rhscneprre,btmrl to merely but contemporaries, his or Goldin condemn to not is observation this make To ff … rn rmteciia td fmdr ieayfrssc stenvl h autobiography, the novel, the as such forms literary modern of study critical the from erent fi fl o h otpr,i stu,teesy elwt set fltrtr hnetedirec- the (hence literature of aspects with deal essays the true, is it part, most the For s afo)teBbia ao n fe ihltl eeec oHbe samodern, a as Hebrew to reference little with often and canon Biblical the of) half rst ecdacag nti tts nisiuinltrs aese oettwr the toward moment watershed a terms, institutional In status. this in change a uenced Gli 90 96.A odnwie napssrp ohsonitouto o the for introduction own his to postscript a in writes Goldin As 1976). 1970; (Goldin ffl rsec a enters fmdr ieaysuisfcsn nJws lan- Jewish on focusing studies literary modern of rise the been has orescence ff cieysmaie nasnl elcoe nhlg otecreteaof era current the to anthology well-chosen single a in summarized ectively eihltrtr n eihlanguages Jewish and literature Jewish ff fi cdpeieyterliterariness. their precisely aced dAeia n uoenJws identi Jewish European and American ed – 97 n .L eez(1852 Peretz L. Y. and 1917) ‘ expression fi l fJws ieaysuishsgn rma endeavor an from gone has studies literary Jewish of eld acCaplan Marc ’ ’ rtqeo eiin atnBuber Martin religion, of critique s “ sakn fsotad ti neddt ev the serve to intended is It shorthand. of kind a as ntetteo h oueadteeintroductory these and volume the of title the In — 48 nta vn,w r icsigltrr expres- literary discussing are we event, that in – 95 ocneprr salssuch Israelis contemporary to 1915) — Kaddish en yteterm the by meant ” fi oenHbe Literature Hebrew Modern ainwt salad for and, Israel with cation Gli 90 96 xiii). 1976: 1970; (Goldin ryri h te)new (then) the in prayer halakha – 8,titled 98), ff ’ — elmto of reclamation s rta a) the law), (ritual rdacnnof canon a ered e,i n,of any, if few, “ literature h Jewish The ’ original — cer- ,an ” — is Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 eto oenJws ieauewst eev ids o aiia aois nashtco the of aesthetic an Sadan parodies, from satirical departure for radical Yiddish reserve this to use Given was every- to grotesque. literature reluctance the Jewish and describing modern shame, for of anxiety, vehicle ment profound natural of expressed the writers merit despised was its aesthetic a Jews, Yiddish the Ashkenazic though the of doubted language; lacked life never literary day Hebrew writers a Where as life, literature. it contemporary creating Hebrew using describe and to Yiddish challenges broke, to between distinctive He resources discontinuities their culture. semantic radical era, Jewish the modern modern a stressing the to and by in Yiddish mentor system, and his academic (1902 Hebrew from Israeli Sadan in however, literature Dov the belletristic philologist of of Israeli product centrality the a of As of student Sforim. a (rebellious) study Mocher as Mendele the and author for intellectual Hebrew) public blueprint a a Disguised as generation Traveler Both past 1939). the (b. for Oz literature. provided Amos Hebrew has and modern Alter 1936) professor, (b. Yehoshua university B. A. as icon Miron Hebrew, literary America in and English, Yiddish vernacular between emnadRsin ore.Atog osiuu ubro h leading the of number conspicuous a Although sources. Russian) philosophy and German continental humanities or the of re-de theory, study of the whole process themselves, the a establishing for be in were resonance was each professors with generally can two scholars, these they two when project, these moment intellectual between larger drawn much be fi this can a of contrast of primarily originators instructive aspect the between one as career but credited is his York. New respectively, dividing in ture, University and Miron Columbia Jerusalem, at in in Yiddish University decades on Hebrew scholarship the three at English-language literature primarily next Hebrew on the scholarship Hebrew-language for resulted that otmoaiso es fhwteltrtr ecniescnrbtst agrhsoia or historical lectures larger of his a book of to excellent views contributes brief, critical considers the his he to example, literature reference For the little how project. in of aesthetic result sense often a can or criticism contemporaries his for this maintained of literature consequence Jewish of discourse. scholars this similarly, explicitly with era, addressed relationship that them often-ambivalent During of none writing. an almost their outset in the topics at Jewish Jews, were movement fractious and diverse o rtcs,adhsonwiighsfeunl mlydaproa,ee doycai aeon take Israeli idiosyncratic in even root personal, took e a reacted employed a considerable have frequently exerted to has theory has theory, writing Bible literary psychoanalytical own the in his that trends and fact subsequent criticism, evident which rather to the Structuralism illustrate to Kafka, signi Franz and Joyce James rciuns n rgetr hrce fmdr eihielge swl steashtc of aesthetics the as well the as to ideologies contributed Jewish Miron have modern modernism. that of Jewish-language fault-lines character formal fragmentary and and linguistic, fractiousness psychological, the of uni examination a of mythos ff l fmdr eihltrr tde,oe h usino ieayter.A rcsl the precisely At theory. literary of question the over studies, literary Jewish modern of eld rudtesm ieteIreishlrDnMrnpbihdhis published Miron Dan scholar Israeli the time same the Around hs o ohAtradMrn lhuhtesuyo oenHbe n ids litera- Yiddish and Hebrew modern of study the although Miron, and Alter both for Thus, le,freape a lotcmltl irgre hsetr ocpullnsae The landscape. conceptual entire this disregarded completely almost has example, for Alter, r lgn ednso h erwpe amNha ilk(1873 Bialik Nahman Haim poet Hebrew the of readings elegant ers — fi atin cant identi zhargon fi fl di aiu trtosa otsrcuaim eosrcin omls,critical formalism, deconstruction, post-structuralism, as iterations various in ed ec ntetehcnuyltrtr.Mrn ycnrs,cm faejs sthe as just age of came contrast, by Miron, literature. twentieth-century on uence fi Mrn17) eoe oteYdihwiig fteblnul(ids and (Yiddish bilingual the of writings Yiddish the to devoted 1973), (Miron dJws utr htbltrdtetlooyo ins a eoean become has Zionism of teleology the bolstered that culture Jewish ed o eiu nelculproe.Tentrlcneunefrtedevelop- the for consequence natural The purposes. intellectual serious for — ouigo nyhl fMendele of half only on focusing fi — fi ’ l fsuyi h otmoaysne oehls,an Nonetheless, sense. contemporary the in study of eld aerhstu enmc oehaiyeggdwith engaged heavily more much been thus has career s igisl ne h in the under itself ning eie rmrl rmFec adscnaiyfrom secondarily (and French from primarily derived ieaystudies Literary ff c.Wa ea,teeoe sarssac othe to resistance a as therefore, began, What ect. 49 ’ oino osrcieinterdependence constructive a of notion s ’ uptwspr falre strategy larger a of part was output s ’ eiint uls book a publish to decision s fl – ec fanwtertcllex- theoretical new a of uence 9,Mrnto sagvnthe given a as took Miron 89), ao n Creativity and Canon fi s oki English, in book rst – 94,tgte with together 1934), fi ue nthis in gures (2000) — in A Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 a ihu om n od n akeswsuo h aeo h epAdteSii fGod of Spirit the deep/And the waters of Bible face the Hebrew the of upon the face was the of darkness upon verse and moved void; second and the form, reads without was Lakish Resh sage third-century and languages multiple rabbah of juxtaposition radical if stra- constructive analogical the contiguity, and and temporalities. ones, contingency logical play, over rhetorical tegies also but intertextuality, emphasizes eto a orcgiemdahntmrl sagneo abnccmetr,btas a also but commentary, rabbinic of genre a as itself merely unto not method midrash recognize hermeneutic to was lection taeyfrapyn t irs sol aaoi nacnign,poiinlsne ti alle- is It sense. provisional contingent, hermeneutical a is single in a intent parabolic mandate the Benjamin to only Walter contemporaries, nor is in text, his precisely Midrash Biblical gorical it. and the applying of Lakish for meaning Resh literal strategy from a establish volume, to particular neither this of in one is contained which reading, a such In Geo is phenomenon the The this between theory. 1980s literary of of the modern anthology practice example since contemporary of emerged the important study and has to the (Rabbinics) relationship most is texts to however, reciprocal Jewish languages question, integral of a this body or which Jewish canonical understanding in fundamental of in ways as means whether literature the One seen of consider unresolved. modern question be remains the can of such curriculum, literatures as study Studies literature Jewish Jewish the of the seen in study component the have integral decades an as three established last the While Alter than theory literary of questions htrisaei h el fthings of realm the in are ruins what etr tefi h oiia rsso t rptd author nonetheless (reputed) an eschatology, its with an messianic of as in crisis well in political as here culminating the canon, stands while in Biblical verse that, itself the Biblical centers history of the Jewish rest the Thus, of with absent. understanding relationship is critical substitutes reciprocally is language intimate, It which 178). for 1998: revelation (Benjamin language of itativeness, Bialik, Mendele, as belles-lettres. Hebrew, such particularly authors and Jewish, belletristic of his of state to current consideration century the a mid-nineteenth or the is Aleichem from Sholem it criticism Kafka, as literary Jewish-language contemporaries, of own history a much as neapeo o,adwy irs ucin seieti h compendium the in evident is functions midrash why, and how, of example An Haman a waste was n h at a ihu form without was earth the And stegetde antb lme,s n antpub[h nqiy fthis of iniquity] [the plumb cannot one so read, plumbed, you as be cannot State. deep wicked great the as oto nteGdo Israel. of God the Israel, in ordering portion decrees, its with Israel oa mieudrwoeocpto h eihkndmhdfle n70 in fallen had kingdom Jewish the occupation whose under Empire Roman h ags n otsigni most and largest the , irs n Literature and Midrash EtV,14). (Est.VI, Jr V 23); IV, (Jer. n h prto h odsalrs pnhim upon rest shall Lord the of spirit the And n h prto o moved God of spirit the And ieayter n abnchermeneutics rabbinic and theory Literary 1 n darkness And n void and fi HrmnadBdc 96.Tesatn rms fti col- this of premise starting The 1986). Budick and (Hartman atrbii omnayt h oko eei.Teethe There Genesis. of Book the to commentary rabbinic cant — fi ” ” ecmeig uulyecuieitrrttoso h verse the of interpretations exclusive mutually competing, ve ’ pntefc ftedeep the of face the Upon n ht napsmdr reading, postmodern a in that, one understanding s Gn ,2) I, (Gen. ’ ”— ;hsrcn book, recent his s; srpeetn h alnes ahrta h author- the than rather fallenness, the representing as yblzsMda[Persia]: Media symbolizes acCaplan Marc yblzsBabylonia: symbolizes yblzsGec,wihdree h ysof eyes the darkened which Greece, symbolizes “ rt ntehr fa xta o aeno have you that ox an of horn the on Write 50 irs Rabbah Midrash — sfollows: as hsaldst h prto h Messiah, the of spirit the to alludes this : —“ “ logocentric ’ leoisae nteramo thoughts, of realm the in are, Allegories speci s ff rmCniut oContiguity to Continuity From e ata n afr Budick Sanford and Hartman rey Ia I 2). XI, (Isa. Feda 98 93 17) 1983: 1938; (Freedman fi circumstance. c ” eedteerh n oit lo and earth, the beheld I — nyb eal,bcuethe because default, by only hswce tt [the State wicked this hyhsee obring to hastened they fi —“ s n foremost and rst n h earth the And CE :just ]: 21) is (2010), Bereshis 2 ’ s Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 h ahso prsin ersin n upeso u loiscetv oeta,a elas well as potential, creative its also e but its suppression of Yiddish and ambiguities and repression, the Russian oppression, of between pathos relationship the the recognizing Slavicists culture or scholars, tern-trained a ieiebogtt ih e nomto n esetv nJws iei h Soviet the academic in this life to addition Jewish In on 2009). Moss con perspective 2006; political a Shternshis the 2004; and of, Shneer scholars independent 2000; information Western-trained and new younger, after, of light formulated work Union to the brought then, likewise Since 2001). has Krutikov 1999; Kerler 1999; coaso usa ieauehv undt ids,adi odigtershlrhphas of result scholarship a As their 2012). Glaser doing to 2011; Russian Murav so from 2010; (Safran in going e around by and way these modernization other Jewish Yiddish, the European than to East rather Yiddish, of turned trend have characteristic a literature reversed Russian of scholars ids salnug fscholarship of language a as Yiddish coaseuae nEsenErp oteWs,adteedo h odWr hc brought which War, Cold the of in end an the brought Soviet and which of West, 1991, reappraisal the a to in about Europe Union Eastern Soviet in the educated of scholars dissolution the particularly academy, fYdihltrtr ruh rat facia experience archival of breadth a brought literature Yiddish of h hp fJws ieayshlrhphsas enin been also has scholarship literary Jewish of shape The ssc rvddpattoeso eosrcinwt rcro rpofetfrterown their for prooftext or precursor a and with head, Budick their and deconstruction Hartman on of In thought practitioners theories. Western provided of assumptions such methodological as the turns quietly tradition, rma xlctyNrhArcnadJws esetv.I e In perspective. language Jewish French and the in African working North of burdens explicitly postcolonial an the particularly from and Origin language of of Prosthesis blems the or, Other: the in midrash of the presence practice, the rabbinic its (Kabala), in within mysticism covered midrash Jewish topics of Milton and John the descriptions midrash and methodological between such Derrida, and theorists interrelationship Jacques literary historical and alongside include Kermode, appear Idel pages Frank Moshe Budick, and Hartman, Dan, Joseph as Stern, David Goldin, Judah agaeaogohr,teicroaino utpelnusi ytm nasnl agae and signi language, achieve single to a languages in systems all linguistic of multiple inability of repre- the incorporation his become the that others, Algeria among so Vichy-controlled language story, in speci life II of War own only World his not during from age sentative midrash of a coming constructs experiences Derrida narrative, autobiographical Derrida philosophy, in autobiographical encountered Western even be subjective, to from explicitly is theory shift more this deconstructive a of and in example religion, One turn politics, perspective. larger of questions a toward presaged practice signi critical most the distinguish speci to and the continues in theory scholarship literary sophisticated with encounter the the Rabbinics, in scholarship ensuing Celan. Paul and Agnon, none ihmdriy u loo h hlspia aeo language of fate philosophical the of also but modernity, with encounter sti re xml eosrts irs,oeaigprle oteWsenphilosophical Western the to parallel operating midrash, demonstrates, example brief this As h nescino irs ihpsmdr hoypoe ob uulypoutv for productive mutually be to proved theory postmodern with midrash of intersection The — ff orts fi n a oet eonz h opeiyo eihlf ne omns:ntjust not communism: under life Jewish of complexity the recognize to come can one al h ae aero aqe erd,teipii cnwegeto irs sa as midrash of acknowledgment implicit the Derrida, Jacques of career later the cally — ’ oty n us-irsi ednsof readings quasi-midrashic and poetry, s hte rmshlr culytandi Soviet in trained actually scholars from whether ff rst comdt h mlcbedmnso oaiains.By totalitarianism. of demands implacable the accommodate to orts fi fi – ntne fpsclnaiy ainldsoain rteJewish the or dislocation, national postcoloniality, of instances c l fRbiisadtesbeun aeo eosrcin For deconstruction. of fate subsequent the and Rabbinics of eld eihclueaogshlr fltrtr.Sve-rie scholars Soviet-trained literature. of scholars among culture Jewish mrigltrr histories literary Emerging fi l,wehri h ntdSae rIre.Frdeconstruction, For Israel. or States United the in whether eld, ’ nhlg,acrigy coaso abncltrtr uhas such literature rabbinic of scholars accordingly, anthology, s Dria19;19) hr h uhrcniestepro- the considers author the where 1998), 1996; (Derrida — htfwWsentandshlr ol ac (Estraikh match could scholars Western-trained few that ieaystudies Literary fi cation. 51 oisnCrusoe Robinson fl ecdb itrcleet usd the outside events historical by uenced fl – cso h odWr(Veidlinger War Cold the of icts ids utr,yugrWes- younger culture, Yiddish — ff c,rte hno than rather ect, swl scmoti using in comfort as well as og usBre,Kafka, Borges, Luis Jorge , ’ essay s — h lcmn fone of placement the “ Détente, ooigaimof Monolingualism ff fi rn an ering atand cant ” fl several xof ux Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 ceie mrcnscey otpesnl,tecneto utcluaima thsbeen a monolingual has surprisingly it a as exceptions few multiculturalism with of been has concept States the United pressingly, the in Most employed society. American acterized bowl otat eas h oit a enblnul(nls n rnh itrcly n t various its and by historically, Canada, French) In and color. (English of bilingual people been and insisting has whites to society between respect Americanist the society with previous American because and language, of in contrast, to rhetoric opposition respect homogenizing binary with the a practices resist on their to reiterated claimed only it it as discourses, much as therefore and cultures independent several possessing Jewish nation single ethnic canon. a of literary of American reclamation concept revised the a including in Studies, inclusion for Jewish candidates within as politics authors identity of growth 98.Nntees h urclmo utcluaimi h Sieial in inevitably US the been in once multiculturalism had of Jews curriculum where the insu ameliorate: Nonetheless, being 1998). to assimilated for most having sought its for life at it ostensibly appeared academic prejudice rhetoric multiculturalist from the new excluded the reiterate Jews, to to respect complacent With ethnicity. an as Jews usaadEsenErp nadto oteUie tts aaa n Israel. and Canada, States, United journal the the to addition of in incorporate practice Europe to studies Eastern the literary Jewish and of in geography Russia the expanded as moreover has It explicit, literature. Hebrew or scholarship, language epnet t hleg frcoighsbcm h inleeti eihSuiso h last the of Studies Jewish The in event historicity. literary signal and the of become focus vernacularity, has a culture, reckoning decades. via of material two of masterworks challenge hegemony performance, of its the to canon of as response restrictive seen questions a was around what by challenge study over-dominated to culture seeking literary historicism, new a the and theory, queer academy American the in trend larger a consideration, of topics and resources, scholars, aiyErpa mirnst h ntdSae,quali pri- States, other United or Jews, the diversity whether of to of establishment “ question immigrants the the concerned European curriculums, debates marily such academic which American to in extent requirements the To ambivalent. was eeaiigSoviet re-examining utr fcneprr ids tde,ti eeomn a nete h td fYiddish of study the unsettled has comparison development conventional this a from Studies, literature Yiddish contemporary of 2009). culture Moss in Soviet the 2004; murdered in (Shneer were stronger writers West much Yiddish remained the Yiddish leading in its of the than closed memory and cultural Union state continued 1930s, the the the 1950s, Although of early Hebrew. end the the of promoted by use vigorously institutions Jews; the and Yiddish toward actively prohibited state policy and the language Revolution institutions, Soviet October of Yiddish-language the consequence following codi explicit years twenty an had the is in literature Leninism Yiddish on early focus of that the students for premise fact historical ideological destroyed as an established have period they and the modernity, Jewish of record conceptual bu h oiiso ieaysuist naaei utr hthdgonwayo the of weary grown had that culture academic an to studies Studies deconstruction. with literary associated arcana of and abstraction politics the about di somewhat a multicultural h term The ttesm iea h rare the as time same the At swt rtclter,terl fJw n eihcluei the in culture Jewish and Jews of role the theory, critical with As nadto oitgaigRsintandadSaiitoine coasit h academic the into scholars Slavicist-oriented and Russian-trained integrating to addition In ” ” ekn orpaetevnrbeiaeof image venerable the replace to seeking nteU nlddapoce uha foetim rtclrc hoy edrstudies, gender theory, race critical Afrocentrism, as such approaches included UK the in — h neil ttso ids santoa agaefrerySve es Indeed, Jews. early-Soviet for language national a as Yiddish of status indelible the “ ” multiculturalism ff rn es,Cnd n ra rti,a well as Britain, Great and Canada sense, erent pk oet ako lrt ntenwdsoreta h itrclsau of status historical the than discourse new the in clarity of lack a to more spoke – ids utr,teeshlr aercntutdavs miia and empirical vast a reconstructed have scholars these culture, Yiddish ” fi dsuyo oenJws ieauercie e nuinof infusion new a received literature Jewish modern of study ed nteUie ttshsbe inmrpiaiybcuethe because primarily misnomer a been has States United the in o well too oErpa n ht mrcnscey(il tal. et (Biale society American white and European to — acCaplan Marc hte mlct si h aeo Miron of case the in as implicit, whether ffi 52 inl uoen o hyrse exclusion risked they now European, ciently “ h etn pot melting the “ Multiculturalism fi da su as ed — nrdcdanwsto debates of set new a introduced — fi ”— dadltrSaiimhad Stalinism later and ed h eahrof metaphor the “ ” ffi utcluaimdebates multiculturalism ee ovnigychar- convincingly never Prooftexts nteU and US the in ciently — “ Other ihmodern with fl ecdthe uenced ’ “ English- s “ — h salad the ” Cultural n in and obe to ff air, ” Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 oeta utr raoaywti mrcnmliutrls icus,weesi a be can it whereas a discourse, signifying as multiculturalist seen American of be autonomy can within literature the anomaly oriented Jewish identi maintaining less of or around US, study rupture than the the reasons, in potential sphere these than public For distinct the communities. ethnically in ethnic and diversity movement diverse multiculturalist representing linguistically the around recently, more more much arrived been whole has the on have populations immigrant ncommunities on meit hni ot mrc.Frti itrclrao,a ela h hoeia a theoretical of the as experience well more as much Their reason, origin historical of patterns. this sites For to America. immigration connection North ongoing in intertwined their than and immediate and recent, more diaspora, much was immigration imperialism, of US tory from Distinct studies. cultural and studies fisfudn coaswt speci with scholars founding its of icus anandamc oeitrainls esetv hnisAeia rCanadian or American its than perspective in internationalist most Its more counterparts. much a maintained discourse nthe in diversity. toward Goldstein moves Eric various in been Identity have discussed American there and deftly Studies, Race, hegemony outset, most Jews, American the Whiteness: white debate, From the of scholarly of inarguable. Price part respect contentious as every reckoned a were in Jews been provoked when, has and whether, decades of two question past the the over cul- culture constitutive Jewish common as the Britain are work Great this and of Atlantic. States, argument Black a the United elective to the features, Central Caribbean, tural modernity. global the to in phenomena diaspora African the Consciousness Modern and nity Literature uigtenntet etr,tercgiino oen oteplinSpadccluehas culture Sephardic post-expulsion modern, of signi recognition lagged the century, nineteenth the during convivencia ( Judeo-Arabic Iberia or medieval Aramaic, of 2004; Hebrew, culture in 2001, belletristic exclusively (Parush and written philosophical, culture rabbinical, Ashkenazic the Although in Yiddish and literature Hebrew Jewish shaping of in 1997). readers semiotics Seidman women social of role the the and as made such have questions scholars meta-textual Moreover, examining writer). bilingual (a Baron signi Dvora and writers), Yiddish Kreitman, Singer ids n erw oee,nwwr nSpadcsuisnwicue oko modern on work includes now studies Sephardic in work new However, Hebrew. and Yiddish tde ic h r of era the since Studies Kreitman Singer Esther Orly writers), Ravikovitch, Dahlia been Hebrew Hareven, had Shulamith signi (all Goldberg, ideologies literature Lea and Jewish Castel-Bloom (Bluwstein), of strategies Rahel study as these the such after for writers recovered decade has (Sokolo a criticism studies than literary literary less mainstream no into mid-1980s, integrated the in began nteU,mawie h td fJws ieaueeegdi h otx fpostcolonial of context the in emerged literature Jewish of study the meanwhile, UK, the In n motn eeomn vrteps w eae a entegot fgne studies gender of growth the been has decades two past the over development important One in the turn, In h einnso ehri tde saohrapc fdiversi of aspect another is Studies Sephardic of beginnings The fi fi atcnrbtost edrdudrtnigo oenJws ieayclueby culture literary Jewish modern of understanding gendered a to contributions cant — fi da rmr xml,ee ucs tr,o aainmulticulturalism. Canadian of story, success a even example, primary a as ed l fJws ieaue steeiosof editors the As literature. Jewish of eld ei rpi,RklKr,CaaRsnab ak eft-usa al including (all, Heifetz-Tussman Malka Rosenfarb, Chava Korn, Rokhl Dropkin, Celia 19)nt,the note, (1992) rcdn h pns nusto nmtdlbrlJws siain nEurope in aspirations Jewish liberal animated Inquisition Spanish the preceding fi atybhn h ou nAheai utr n t isoa n t ieaue in literatures its and diaspora, its and culture Ashkenazic on focus the behind cantly — fl rmrl African primarily ec htvrosmliutrls icusshv xre ntesuyof study the on exerted have discourses multiculturalist various that uence ffi fl isncatdsJudentums des Wissenschaft eta oki hsrseti alGilroy Paul is respect this in work uential iis n ntutv otat ewe h eihdapr n the and diaspora Jewish the between contrasts instructive and nities, fi s nlnso eiitapoc oJws ieaysuisonly studies literary Jewish to approach feminist a of inklings rst 19) hc identi which (1993), fi – tad fBiihMrimadGasinaayi,this analysis, Gramscian and Marxism British of strands c aiba n ninsubcontinental Indian and Caribbean ieaystudies Literary 53 “ multiculturalism, n h da faJewish a of ideal the and , edradTx nMdr erwadYiddish and Hebrew Modern in Text and Gender 20) enhl,wti the within Meanwhile, (2006). fi ff stepltclft n utrlpatcsof practices cultural and fate political the es ta.19) ic hnhwvr feminist however, then Since 1992). al. et — a enapecuaini Jewish in preoccupation a been has — ” fi h itro sa Bashevis Isaac of sister the ainwti eihStudies. Jewish within cation otooilsuisfocused studies postcolonial ’ s fi atYdihadHebrew and Yiddish cant h lc tatc Moder- Atlantic: Black The — – htsae his- a shared that Muslim fi al-Andalus l fJewish of eld ’ book s – Christian ffi liations The ) — Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 rtcMcalKae a rudi rvctv essay provocative a in argued has ‘ Kramer Michael critic otn rteauthor the or content enclr uha nls,Fec,o emn(o xml,Ribu 99 aul 2009; Samuels 1999; Reizbaum example, (for national German in Jews or about French, and Sucho by English, written as literature of such scholars, vernaculars individual to mean may that whatever etei h ado sal ttesm ie i rms rusfrardclyAmerican radically a for argues premise his a time, no essentially same with the writers At equating implicitly Israel. literature, of Jewish of Land democratization the in settle signi a recognize can one regard, this In surrounding the from signi and prestigious new languages most empires the four these Hungarian), or of or three dissolution Jewish Czech, among the Polish, Where choice following as a Yiddish. and such had Yiddish, and languages empires German, Hebrew national literature Austrian or Ladino modernity, or Russian between Ashkenazic Czarist parity (Hebrew, the of of sense in languages a intellectuals primary seek not the should and one Studies, Jewish contemporary models. Spanish and ground- 2005), Hebrew, the French, (Lehmann with as Empire comparatively well Empires Ottoman as Ottoman 2011), and the Russian (Borovaya in study, belles-lettres comparative culture and cross-cultural rabbinic breaking journalism theatre, and Ladino Ladino modern in writing religious o eeya eihwies u raoso eihltrtr.Adyt fade a if yet, And literature. Jewish of creators Cahan but Abraham or writers, Agnon, Y. Jewish Sh. Sforim, as Mocher Mendele merely to however measure not steeped, equal in authors count with would language. peoplehood and Jewish practice, or religious learning, religion Jewish Jewish in the critically, for sympathy even practice linguistic Jewish poles of two forms these Other between English). somewhere Jewish secular located of are varieties most (e.g. the traits of marginal concentration di argued, high that a has characteristics with Hary those linguistic Benjamin from distinct linguist stretching continuum prominent the a As on Jewish written. varieties in all language and among continuum spoken variability have a and interconnectedness “ Jews stress the that today understand languages to models scholars French. the philological allows culture, was Jewish that and realm, modern use linguistic within belletristic language diversity sophisticated the ethnic and most in linguistic particularly the quantify to diaspora, attempting Sephardic than modern Rather the of language utrlmressc slnug,tee rmr eaal uhra net eet this Beneath intent. authorial in debatably an detect more moreover or can theme, one Jewish thesis, language, Jewish of inclusive of irrespective as write, question cheeringly people the such Jewish broadly whatever markers more is and literature cultural criticism, Jewish literary that declaring Jewish by of identity, knot Gordian the cuts essay “ insi mrc feeysrn nJws utr,ee t otuna most its even culture, Jewish in strand every of embrace Zionistic osqec n osiunso nidvsbe fitnil,Jwsns;hscapoigo every of in championing participant his a Jewishness; as intangible, writer if Jewish-originated indivisible, an of constituents and consequence fexiles of Jewish hsi h h dao h eihlnusi pcrmi epu.I losu opaeJewish place to us allows It helpful. is spectrum linguistic Jewish the of idea the why is This a freturn of law lhuhtesuyo ehri utr sawloeadln vru opnn of component overdue long and welcome a is culture Sephardic of study the Although codn otelgco hsesy ahne et oi atra,o lrc Lispector Clarice or Pasternak, Boris West, Nathanael essay, this of logic the to According ff ’ ” 01 imnadZps19) tprastefrhs xrm,teIsraeli the extreme, furthest the perhaps At 1997). Zipes and Gilman 2011; Question ttehato ins n eihmsinctogt swl stecneprr Israeli contemporary the as well as thought, messianic Jewish and Zionist of heart the at ” rnigctznhpt n esnal odmntaeJws rgn ekn to seeking origins Jewish demonstrate to able person any to citizenship granting ”— that ’ sa ‘ dominant ffi any ito,cut as counts liation, Sen20) n okta osdr otmoayLdn poetry Ladino contemporary considers that work and 2004), (Stein eodJws languages Jewish Beyond oko ieauewitnb eihpro,rgrls fits of regardless person, Jewish a by written literature of work ’ agaevreis(..Ydih otoewt nyfwand few only with those to Yiddish) (e.g. varieties language fi atintensi cant “ acCaplan Marc aigJw oen h ids n aioPesi the in Press Ladino and Yiddish the Modern: Jews Making eihliterature Jewish “ Jewish 54 ” Hr 01 44). 2011: (Hary ff rnit hmlnusial n culturally and linguistically them erentiate ” fi aino neeti h eihcharacter, Jewish the in interest of cation ieaue(rmr20) nasne this sense, a In 2001). (Kramer literature —“ fl ” ec nKramer on uence al omn ohthe both mind to calls ae ieayHsoy n the and History, Literary Race, ffi itdapcs sthe as aspects, liated ’ huh fthe of thought s “ ingathering ffi – American ito or liation fi fi ning cant Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 hl rvln oadpriiaigi nitrainlwriter di international the an in split participating and to traveling while rdcsosi h raino eihltrtr,tepleo dniyi omltossuch formulations in identity of his pulse as the well as literature, literature, Jewish world of in American contemporaries creation his as the of many in like predecessors Shammas, Anton like writer a h de the primarily stories depicting parallel Hebrew, in two written tells literature: author considering it Israeli worth or characters, is Arab, It Arabic-speaking signi Jewish, Israel? and variously, in Hebrew, of, culture notion in non-Jewish) Shammas (i.e., novel that Arab a challenge of the and predicament translations the Arabic, on English in poetry includes work ih ugs,teeoe htjs sBnai ayhspooe a proposed has Hary Benjamin to as solution just his that therefore, signi framed suggest, is might has up Kramer takes radically essay his However question texts? the traditional quandary, this of study intensive nor e been otherwise have they which from history a and land a in American Latin how American or where the then as languages, such Jewish historically authors of locate use one the is might literature Jewish of characteristic otoms n hn oa fa of today think one must too so Arab an novel for the be States, might genre this of appeal h aeo oho hs oe tutrs h aeecutrfrpsmdrit uhas such postmodernists for encounter same Shammas multiplicity. the in home structures, at in power being homelessness of and these loss prospect of of the sense suggests both a Shammas in of resulted liberating face had the modernists advertising the Jewish for for occasion modernity the and provides tradition modernism, contrast literary o in of modernity, crisis possibilities global and with angst encounter the the which to for postmodernism, cosmopolitan a with aiirt ihteJws eta rdto hti a oeitmt n nxrcbeta the language. than Jewish inextricable a and in intimate working more not far authors is that Jewish tradition most textual of Jewish writing the Shammas with forms, familiarity storytelling a Arabic and its Hebrew between in yet, And author. French, to relationship own rfudprle oDerrida to parallel profound rtcs nAgohn Jewish literary astute Anglophone most the of on much produced have criticism who Budick, Miller Emily and Wirth-Nesher Hana 1928 a salo o,miti oenlfsye hrceie ete ytaiinlrlgosobservance religious traditional by neither characterized lifestyles modern maintain not, or Israel culture snnJws u oehls erwsekn.Utmtl,wa stemaigof meaning the is what population use Israeli therefore Ultimately, the and Hebrew-speaking. Israel, of percent of nonetheless outside 20 but approximately live while non-Jewish world life, the is daily in their Jews in as languages identifying non-Jewish people de the be of must, percent and 60 might, literature Jewish how ffi ffi h aiysg,freape sapiiee er npsclna ieaue atclryin particularly literature, postcolonial in genre privileged a is example, for saga, family The Shammas rmri ato oei fAeia-onIreishlr,icuigms prominently most including scholars, Israeli American-born of coterie a of part is Kramer itos utpstos n agae nwihJws ieauemgtb identi be might literature Jewish which in languages and juxtapositions, liations, itosit nayrelation. uneasy into liations fi ids-nls-erwDictionary Yiddish-English-Hebrew ’ ” w aiyhsoy n nioi con fteauthor the of account ironic an and history, family own s iino eihltrtr,btmr ral o h enn fJwsns ssc.One such. as Jewishness of meaning the for broadly more but literature, Jewish of nition or ff “ ’ rnebtenpsclna n otoenltrr icus Sams1986). (Shammas discourse literary postmodern and postcolonial between erence – oe,i nitn admwt Kramer with tandem unwitting in novel, s eihidentity Jewish Arab ff rdb utpentoaiis agae,adsye.I h none between encounter the If styles. and languages, nationalities, multiple by ered ’ fi lyo dniis agae eprlt,adgneidct t contemporaneity its indicate genre and temporality, language, identities, of play s to,snea er tsre odaaieadsosse people dispossessed a dramatize to serves it genre a as since ction, – sal,lk Derrida like Israeli, fl etmseyo erwiima ela t ihyalsv interplay allusive richly its as well as idiom Hebrew of mastery uent ” ’ ’ n oe t date), (to novel one s hssin thesis s Arabesques hntegetmjrt fpol dniyn sJw,wehrin whether Jews, as identifying people of majority great the when – mrcnltrtr flate. of literature American “ eihltrr spectrum, literary Jewish ’ sFranco utb esrda h yhn htbigthese bring that hyphens the at measured be must , – ooigaimo h Other the of Monolingualism sal rtr h oehls eie oa nteUnited the in today resides nonetheless who writer, Israeli switni agaeta osnot does that language a in written is ieaystudies Literary fi 55 e eodJws agae.Tdy oethan more Today, languages. Jewish beyond ned – aheinJwsns,o lxne Harkavy Alexander or Jewishness, Maghrebian – Arab Arabeskot fi atntjs o h rbesi oe for poses it problems the for just not cant – ’ — sa,teeoepssteqeto of question the poses therefore essay, s sal rtrAtnSams whose Shammas, Anton writer Israeli ’ oe eel nisondislocation own its in reveals novel s aiysaga family a ’ sconferenceinIowa ( “ Arabesques, ” alI English It Call ’ htcnicuetemultiple the include can that usi fapatmcousin phantom a of pursuit s ff uta erd ecie his describes Derrida as just : “ cd oee vdn the evident However aced. eihlnusi spectrum, linguistic Jewish fi ” ’ s tvl eeln the retelling ctively 96,psst any to poses 1986), fi to hso thus ction “ — fi (Wirth-Nesher belong atesy in essays cant ’ httogether that rootedness s fi d o a For ed. “ ” Jewish ff oits to r a ers ’ ” s Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 edtruhalre igitc itrcl n utrlsre fa of series cultural and historical, linguistic, larger a through read ncnrs oti ou na on focus this to contrast In English- ostensibly within tensions linguistic the of study insightful an language is example, for 2006), ntttoa icpiet h mato rtclter otepoieaino utcluaimin multiculturalism of proliferation the to aspects theory its critical of of impact all the to discipline institutional works these ways, dia- complementary a In via another. culture Jewish American the one “ of American in with meaning ethnicity that the encounter of with demonstrate examples agonistic struggle preeminent common often as a logical, Americans, in Jewish engage States, and United Americans African how of literature. this (intercut?) undercut Conversation and inform languages, other among fJws efhte,teiaeo h eihbd,mtso eihitliec,adthe and intelligence, Jewish of myths in body, greatest Jewish The history. the medical with of culture image Jewish of the intersection self-hatred, Jewish of in her has culture, research Jewish her these Kir- of although in Barbara each studies; topics of in tourism on methodology work and primarily The studies, focused life. museum the been everyday up studies, in of opening performance topics practice in study they culture, to pioneering the as order been and in theory has law critical culture, also and shenblatt-Gimblett of history, popular has literature, assumptions culture, philosophy, thinking and of visual New study techniques the the 2011). in 2004; using developed Finkelman (Roth have studies, 2008; languages middlebrow cultural Omer-Sherman to to from addition and attention emerged in particular Baskind image-texts pay 2008; and that Ben-Ari reception, studies audience with writing, spectrum, subcultural literary Jewish a of n rtn rmtenntet n wnit etre nErp,Ire,adteAmericas the and this Israel, in Europe, Work 2013). in writers al. centuries neglected et of Hess twentieth number 2005; and Weinbaum good nineteenth 2002; a (Eshed recovered the has from that writing studies and literary cultural mass and popular evsv n auay n ntr ohtepoiec fti e icus swl sthe as culture. well or as language, discourse literature, new of study this methodological essential the reformulating of constitutes as prominence seen what be the about can Studies questions both Jewish to turn studies cultural in extraordinary of centrality and an to salutary, life and everyday pervasive of practice the Shandler analyzing of degree, mandate studies cultural the pursues German a xre nthe on exerted has h nentoa ouaiyo contemporary of popularity international the Je in evident is methodology Such other. the informs methodology one Shandler that so writer studies belletristic a authors be Jewish to on Freud perspectives new even or study, ain ohfo n oYdih h oilg fYdihlnug eaoy h s of use the pedagogy, language Yiddish ( of kitsch Yiddish-language sociology trans- of the contemporary popularity purview the Yiddish, its speakers, to non-native in among includes and Yiddish and from Holocaust, both the following lations Yiddish of status the American, htec fteedvlpet demonstrates developments these of each What iial in Similarly – ’ s eihclue mn h oista i eerhhssae r nlddterhetoric the included are shaped has research his that topics the Among culture. Jewish fi detrsi idsln:Psvraua agaeadCulture and Language Postvernacular Yiddishland: in Adventures to yJws rtr,rvaigt htetn coso erwadYiddish, and Hebrew of echoes extent what to revealing writers, Jewish by ction ” Bdc 98 soeo h ettetet fpeieytemliutrlquestion multicultural the precisely of treatments best the of one is 1998) (Budick ras or fl — eta stewr fteclua itra adrGla,piaiyon primarily Gilman, Sander historian cultural the of work the is uential ’ sin sacmo tutr ntercn itr fJws ieaysuy rma from study; literary Jewish of history recent the in structure common a is “ fi Jewish, fl l fJws ieauehsntbe oo to been not has literature Jewish of eld ec ntewhole the on uence ” ih o,admiddlebrow and low, High, “ u nisustldngtainwt ohidenti both with negotiation unsettled its in but — canonical fi ls hte naJws otx rnot. or context Jewish a in whether elds, u ahrt sals eirct ewe ieayadcultural and literary between reciprocity a establish to rather but fi to a enihrdsigihdnresnilzdas essentialized nor distinguished neither be can ction ” de acCaplan Marc fi iino eltitcltrtr sadynamic a is literature belletristic of nition klezmer fi 56 l fcneprr ids tde a been has Studies Yiddish contemporary of eld — — nes ntecs fGla,oeconsiders one Gilman, of case the in unless, rmtebgnigo eihSuisa an as Studies Jewish of beginning the from ui.Atog h ou fti research this of focus the Although music. fi fl lso eihehorpy visual ethnography, Jewish of elds ec xed oteter and theory the to extends uence fi l locnrbtst thinking to contributes also eld ff ffi rnwde new er fl itosadruptures. and liations ec aho hs scholars these of each uence lcsadJw nLiterary in Jews and Blacks 20) hc examines which (2006), fi iin fliterary of nitions fi ain utbe must cations tschotschkes fi fi l of eld ,and ), ction, ff rey Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 akn,Smnh,adOe-hra,Rnn(2008) Ranen Omer-Sherman, and Samantha, Baskind, —— (1975) Robert Alter, (1998) Jacques Derrida, culture, Jewish is extent what since to culture Canaan: Jewish of constituted fact land the in the de has both on that been sights changes questions has his of that de culture series set however way a Jewish Abraham is a Biblical which process in the in this of theories way the heart within the and the scholars and methodologies discourse, discourse new new a inherited assimilated of reception have the Studies in belatedness of position td fmdr eihltrtr easuyo eihclue n o a tb h td of study the be it can how and both? culture, be Jewish inevitably of must study it a when be literature, literature modern Jewish modern of study e-r,N (2008) N. Ben-Ari, Geo Hartman, ejmn atr(1998) Walter Benjamin, tacetv mlaaino t urudn utrswt t atin past its with cultures surrounding its of amalgamation creative a it hma,Atn(2001) Anton Shammas, io,Dn(2010) Dan Miron, (1986) (eds) Barbara Harshav, and Benjamin Harshav, Tetasainhr di here translation The 2 between connection The 1 Press. lan- of meaning the into inquiry identi brief cultural elegant, frustrating lucid, and stunningly creating in A guage Press. University Stanford Stanford: Translation, Press. University Rutgers N.J.: Brunswick, the beginnings of the experience toward Jewish slouches a to it how as writing of modernity of example global of an inevitability consciousness postmodern. good a the the as transform of demonstrating is and This shape while expectations. can expression, world these literary subvert and and trespass linguistic determine that y,A,Slsne,M,adSmoi .(d.,Asedm onBnaisPbihn opn,pp. Company, Publishing Benjamins John Amsterdam: (eds.), D. Simeoni, and 1 M., Shlesinger, A., Pym, motn coa fteesbet okn ntecneprr era. contemporary the in Jewish working of signi subjects history these the modern of the as on scholar views important well of summation as magisterial and literature monumental The Press. University nudrtnigo ieaymdrim n necletitouto omdr ids literature, Yiddish modern to signi introduction as excellent signi well the an as for and perspectives made critical modernism, ever invaluable literary case including best of The understanding Press. an California of University keley: thought rabbinic when happened what theory. of overview pristine A Press. rte n otclual signi culturally most and written h mlctoso hsbook this of implications The en etadconsidered. and felt being – v nti es,se(r ahr er)BbDylan, Bob hear!) rather, (or, see verse, this on o (2000) 18. hu — void ao n raiiy oenWiigadteAtoiyo Scripture of Authority the and Writing Modern Creativity: and Canon fi ” e,auiu,atnmu,adidpnetpeoeo,adt htetn is extent what to and phenomenon, independent and autonomous, unique, a ned, ff — e .adSnodBdc (1986) Budick Sanford and H. rey in and eodDsrpieTasainSuis netgtosi oaet ienToury Gideon to Homage in Investigations Studies: Translation Descriptive Beyond rmCniut oCniut:Twr e eihLtrr Thinking Literary Jewish New a Toward Contiguity: to Continuity From “ oua asPouto ntePrpey Socio Periphery: the in Production Mass Popular oenHbe Literature Hebrew Modern va ’ h ooigaimo h te:o,TePoteso Origin of Prostheis The or, Other: the of Monolingualism The ya Arabesques h rgno emnTai Drama Tragic German of Origin The vh ff r elgbyfo h ulse eso.Framr otmoaymidrash contemporary more a For version. published the from negligibly ers ill “ u void ’ , civmn o sal utr,Jws utr,adAa utr r still are culture Arab and culture, Jewish culture, Israeli for achievement s fi “ ac fltrr rtcs nJws agae rmtesnl most single the from languages Jewish in criticism literary of cance rn.Vva dn ekly nvriyo aionaPes h best The Press. California of University Berkeley: Eden. Vivian Trans. , hyhastened. they ” fi atnvlwitndrn h 90 naJws agae Hebrew. language, Jewish a in 1980s the during written novel cant and seta reading Essential “ Bibliography hastens e ok era House. Behrman York: New , ieaystudies Literary Notes fi ” ” ain tilsrtstesrcue fpltcldomination political of structures the illustrates it cation, 57 “ sa nrnltbe n oehtfre,wr play; word forced, somewhat and untranslatable, an is irs n Literature and Midrash prto h Water the on Spirit mrcnYdihPer:ABlnulAnthology Bilingual A Poetry: Yiddish American h eihGahcNvl rtclApproaches Critical Novel: Graphic Jewish The fi athsoia documentation. historical cant rnl yJh bbre odn Verso. London: Obsborne, John by Transl. . fi - oiia ednisi Subversive in Tendencies Political s aecnatwt postmodern with contact made rst ” e ae:Yl University Yale Haven: New , Dln2006). (Dylan e ae:Yl University Yale Haven: New , fi ac fYdihper to poetry Yiddish of cance fl ecs o a the can How uences? fi rn.PtikMensah. Patrick Trans. , e n tde.At studied. and ned tnod Stanford Stanford: , fi l fJewish of eld or,G., Toury, , New , Ber- , Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 il,Dvd acisy ihe,adHshl uanh(d. (1998) (eds.) Susannah Heschel, and Michael, Galchinsky, David, Biale, ooaa la(2011) Olga Borovaya, erd,Jcus(96 1998) (1996; Jacques Derrida, (1998) M. Emily Budick, rtkv .(2001) M. Krutikov, se,E (2002) E. Eshed, (2006) Bob Dylan, io,D 17;1996) (1973; D. Miron, (2005) Matthias Lehmann, odn ua 17;1976) (1970; Judah Goldin, 1983). (1938; H. Dr. Rabbi Freedman, (2011) Yoel Finkelman, odti,Ei .(2006) L. Eric Goldstein, (1999) G. Estraikh, ata,Geo Hartman, (1986) (eds.) Barbara Harshav, and Benjamin Harshav, rmr ihe (2001) Michael Kramer, (2013) (1999) Nadia Dov-Ber Valman, Kerler, and Maurice, Samuels, M., Jonathan Hess, —— lsr mla(2012) Amelia Glaser, (1993) Paul (1997) (eds.) Gilroy, Jack Zipes, and L. Sander Gilman, ay ejmn(2011) Benjamin Hary, os ent .(2009), B. Kenneth Moss, oh arne(2004) Laurence Roth, (1999) Marilyn Reizbaum, arn arel (2010) Gabriella Safran, ua,Hrit(2011) Harriet Murav, auh rs(01 2004) (2001; Iris Parush, aul,Muie(2009) Maurice Samuels, Multiculturalism Press. Press. University Indiana Bloomington: 287 nvriyPress. University nvriyPress. University Press. versity Press. nvriyo aionaPress. California of University Press. University ..(d.,AnAbr I rne nttt nul p 43 pp. Annual, Institute Frankel MI: Arbor, Ann (eds.), J.L. yaue Y yaueUiest Press. University Syracuse NY: Syracuse, Bookshop Press. University 1096 Culture, Press. Soncino The London: Freedman, doxy h tr fIreipop Israeli of story the Reader Press. nvriyPress. University nvriyPress. University uoenJws Society Jewish European aiona tnodUiest Press. University Stanford California: fHradUiest Press. University Harvard of tnodUiest Press University Stanford (2010) – otn cdmcSuisPress. Studies Academic Boston: , 349. tnod tnodUiest Press. University Stanford Stanford: , vntn L otwsenUiest Press. University Northwestern IL: Evanston, , rmCniut oCniut:Twr e eihLtrr Thinking Literary Jewish New a Toward Contiguity: to Continuity From ff – e .adBdc,Snod(1986) Sanford Budick, and H. rey ekly nvriyo aionaPress. California of University Berkeley: , 1996 itra ve- Mi-tarzan oitYdih agaePann n igitcDevelopment Linguistic and Planning Language Yiddish: Soviet oenTimes Modern h lc tatc oent n oenConsciousness Modern and Modernity Atlantic: Black The ids ito n h rsso oent,1905 Modernity, of Crisis the and Fiction Yiddish e ae:Yl nvriyPress. University Yale Haven: New , esadUriin nRussia in Ukrainians and Jews oenLdn utr:Pes elsLtrs n hae nteLt toa Empire Ottoman Late the in Theater and Lettres, Belles Press, Culture: Ladino Modern ui rmaSedn ri:Jws ieauei otRvlto Russia Post-Revolution in Literature Jewish Train: Speeding a From Music adrn ol h Dybbuk The Soul: Wandering “ h rgn fMdr ieayYiddish Literary Modern of Origins The trbr,Say tas) ata,M:Badi nvriyPress. University Brandeis MA: Waltham, (trans.), Saadya Sternberg, , rvle igie:TeRs fMdr ids ito nteNntet Century Nineteenth the in Fiction Yiddish Modern of Rise The Disguised: Traveller A eihRnisnei h usa Revolution Russian the in Renaissance Jewish tityKse edn:PplrLtrtr n h odto fCneprr Ortho- Contemporary of Condition the and Literature Popular Reading: Kosher Strictly lcsadJw nLtrr Conversation Literary in Jews and Blacks “ npcigJw:Aeia eihDtcieStories Detective Jewish American Jews: Inspecting edn eihWmn agnlt n oenzto nNntet-etr Eastern Nineteenth-Century in Modernization and Marginality Women: Jewish Reading Religiolect, fi ae ieayHsoy n the and History, Literary Race, netn h salt:Jws ito nteNntet-etr France Nineteenth-Century the in Fiction Jewish Israelite: the Inventing h rc fWiees es ae n mrcnIdentity American and Race, Jews, Whiteness: of Price The to] e vv ae [Hebrew]. Bavel Aviv: Tel ction], ae Joyce James aioRbii ieaueadOtmnSpadcCulture Sephardic Ottoman and Literature Rabbinic Ladino h eihExpression Jewish The ooigaimo h te,o,TePotei fOrigin of Prosthesis The or, Other, the of Monolingualism ’ dzeg asprse asfu applrtha- ha-popularit ha-sifrut shel Ha-sipur zbeng: ad e ok oubaRecords. Columbia York: New , ” ’ uacOther Judaic s in rtclTrsi eihLnug Studies Language Jewish in Terms Critical irs Rabbah Midrash acCaplan Marc e ae:Yl nvriyPress. University Yale Haven: New , aeCmaint eihWiigadTogti German in Thought and Writing Jewish to Companion Yale ’ ieayBrelns rmteStt art h Petersburg the to Fair Shtetl the From Borderlands: Literary s tnod tnodUiest Press. University Stanford Stanford: , 58 ’ mrcnYdihPer:ABlnulAnthology Bilingual A Poetry: Yiddish American rao,S An-Sky S. Creator, s irs n Literature and Midrash oueOe rnltdb ab r H. Dr. Rabbi by Translated One. Volume , ‘ Jewish abig Egad:CmrdeUniversity Cambridge [England]: Cambridge , e ok lrno Press. Clarendon York: New , – 45. abig,M:HradUiest Press. University Harvard MA: Cambridge, , ’ Question, – ieenhCnuyJws ieaue A Literature: Jewish Nineteenth-Century 1914 nie/usdr mrcnJw and Jews American Insider/Outsider: e rnwc,N:Rutgers NJ: Brunswick, New , abig,M:BlnpPress Belknap MA: Cambridge, , e ae:Yl University Yale Haven: New , tnod ai:Safr Uni- Stanford Calif: Stanford, , xod[nln] Clarendon [England]: Oxford , ’ abig,Ms:Harvard Mass: Cambridge, , Ivrit ” Prooftexts tnod A Stanford CA: Stanford, . oih .adMiller, and A. Norich, , Fo aznt Zbeng: to Tarzan [From ,Stanford,CA:Stanford loigo:Indiana Bloomington: , rneo:Princeton Princeton: , o.2,N.3: No. 21, Vol. , Stanford: , Stanford, , Berkeley: , , , Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 20:12 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203497470, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203497470.ch3 hma,Atn(1988) Anton Shammas, (1997) Naomi Seidman, hnlr Je Shandler, her ai (2004) David Shneer, henhs na(2006) Anna Shternshis, Sokolo Sucho ti,SrhArvy (2004) Abrevaya Sarah Stein, edigr ete (2000) Jettrey Veidlinger, enam ay (2005) Batya Weinbaum, it-ehr aa(2006) Hana Wirth-Nesher, nvriyo aionaPress. California of University fClfri Press. California of nvriyPress. University loigo:IdaaUiest Press. University Indiana Bloomington: erwadYdihLiterature Yiddish and Hebrew fPnslai Press. Pennsylvania of Empires nin nvriyPress. University Indiana tde nAeia eihLiterature Jewish American in Studies rneo nvriyPress. University Princeton ff ff ai (2011) David , am . enr neLpds n oih nt es)(1992) (eds.) Anita Norich, and Lapidus, Anne Lerner, B., Naomi , loigo:IdaaUiest Press. University Indiana Bloomington: , ff e (2006). rey ids n h raino oitJws utr,1918 Culture, Jewish Soviet of Creation the and Yiddish Kafka detrsi idsln:Psvraua agaeadCulture and Language Postvernacular Yiddishland: in Adventures Arabesques araeMd nHae:TeSxa oiiso erwadYiddish and Hebrew of Politics Sexual The Heaven: in Made Marriage A h ocwSaeYdihTetr eihClueo h oitStage Soviet the on Culture Jewish Theater: Yiddish State Moscow The oitadKse:Jws oua utr nteSve no,1923 Union, Soviet the in Culture Popular Jewish Kosher: and Soviet “ al ..SiF:Ps-ainls xlrto o esi ue Space? Outer in Jews for Exploration Post-Nationalist Fi: Sci U.S. Early ’ eihLnugs h idnOens fTradition of Openness Hidden The Languages: Jewish s alI nls:TeLnugso eihAeia Literature American Jewish of Languages The English: It Call aigJw oen h ids n aioPesi h usa n Ottoman and Russian the in Press Ladino and Yiddish the Modern: Jews Making e ok eihTelgclSmnr fAmerica. of Seminary Theological Jewish York: New , e ok apr&Row. & Harper York: New , o.2:180 24: Vol. , ieaystudies Literary – 59 201. – 1930 edradTx nModern in Text and Gender hldlha University Philadelphia: , abig:Cambridge Cambridge: , ekly University Berkeley: , rneo,NJ: Princeton, , Bloomington: , Berkeley: , – 1939 ” ,