DOCSLIB.ORG

Williams Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Williams Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Williams Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 2335-039 Maine Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 APPLICATION .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF ACTION AND NEED FOR POWER ......................................... 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action .......................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Need for Power .............................................................................................. 3 1.3 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ................................. 3 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ......................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Clean Water Act ............................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act ................................................................................ 5 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ..................................................................... 5 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act ............................................................... 6 1.4 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT ................................................................ 6 1.4.1 Scoping .......................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Interventions .................................................................................................. 7 1.4.3 Comments on the Application ....................................................................... 7 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ................................................. 8 2.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ............................................................................ 8 2.1.1 Existing Project Facilities .............................................................................. 8 2.1.2 Project Safety .............................................................................................. 10 2.1.3 Existing Project Operation .......................................................................... 10 2.2 APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL ............................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Proposed Operation and Environmental Measures ..................................... 11 2.2.2 Mandatory Conditions ................................................................................. 12 2.3 STAFF ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................... 12 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 13 2.4.1 Issuing Non-power License ......................................................................... 13 2.4.2 Federal Government Takeover of the Project ............................................. 13 2.4.3 Retiring the Project ...................................................................................... 13 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 14 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER BASIN ............... 14 3.2 SCOPE OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS ........................................ 15 3.2.1 Geographic Scope ........................................................................................ 15 3.2.2 Temporal Scope ........................................................................................... 16 3.3 PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION ALTERNATIVES ............................... 16 3.3.1 Aquatic Resources ....................................................................................... 16 i 3.3.2 Terrestrial Resources ................................................................................... 47 3.3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................... 52 3.3.4 Land Use and Recreation ............................................................................ 55 3.3.5 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................... 61 4.0 DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS .................................................................... 64 4.1 POWER AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT .......................... 65 4.2 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................. 66 4.2.1 No-Action Alternative ................................................................................. 67 4.2.2 White Pine Hydro’s Proposal ...................................................................... 67 4.2.3 Staff Alternative .......................................................................................... 68 4.3 COST OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES .................................................. 69 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. 74 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT AND RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................ 74 5.1.1 Additional Measures Recommended by Staff ............................................. 75 5.1.2 Measures Not Recommended ...................................................................... 79 5.1.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 80 5.2 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS ......................................................... 81 5.3 SUMMARY OF SECTION 10(j) RECOMMENDATIONS ............................. 81 5.4 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLANS ..................................... 83 6.0 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .................................................... 84 7.0 LITERATURE CITED ....................................................................................... 85 8.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ...................................................................................... 90 APPENDIX A .................................................................................................................. A-1 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the Williams Project and other dams in the Kennebec River Basin (Source: staff). ............................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2. Williams Project site plan (Source: license application, as modified by staff). .. 9 Figure 3. Hourly discharge data for the Wyman and Williams Projects in 2012 (Source: staff analysis of operation data provided in White Pine Hydro's April 29, 2016, filing). ........................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 4. Areas sampled in the impoundment during the electrofishing surveys. The tributaries sampled during the survey are not shown (Source: Figure 2.2-1 from White Pine Hydro’s initial study report (ISR) filed June 23, 2014).......................... 21 Figure 5. Areas sampled downstream of the project dam during the electrofishing surveys. The tributaries sampled during the survey are not shown (Source: ISR Figure 2.2-2, filed June 23, 2014). ............................................................................ 22 Figure 6. Annual returns of adult Atlantic salmon to U.S. rivers. "Natural" fish were spawned in rivers, and "hatchery" fish were produced in hatcheries and stocked as part of restoration programs. "ISW" and "2SW" indicate how many winters the fish spent in the ocean before returning to spawn (Source: USASAC, 2015). ............... 25 Figure 7. Locations salmonids occupied during the telemetry study (Source: ISR Figure 2.2-55, filed June 23, 2014). ...................................................................................... 29 Figure 8. Down ramping rate frequency based on the 2007 through 2012 operation data (Source: staff analysis of project operation data filed April 29, 2016). ................... 39 Figure 9. Monthly mean number of times down ramping rates exceeded 0.2 fph based on the 2007 through 2012 operation data. Due to missing data, the mean for July through December was based on data from five years (2008 was excluded) (Source: staff analysis of project operation data filed April 29, 2016). ................................... 39 Figure 10. Comparison of re-regulated flow in the Kennebec River at Madison (USGS gage no. 1047150) to unregulated flow in the Carrabassett River (USGS gage no. 1047000) from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014. .......................................... 43 Figure 11. Kennebec River and overflow channel downstream of the Williams Project. The figure shows the transect and centerline streambed elevation (i.e., “longitudinal cross
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Smallest Republic : Indian Stream Carl Gustafson
    Document généré le 1 oct. 2021 04:41 Histoire Québec The World's Smallest Republic : Indian Stream Carl Gustafson Volume 16, numéro 2, 2010 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/66139ac Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Les Éditions Histoire Québec La Fédération des sociétés d’histoire du Québec ISSN 1201-4710 (imprimé) 1923-2101 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Gustafson, C. (2010). The World's Smallest Republic : Indian Stream. Histoire Québec, 16(2), 36–40. Tous droits réservés © Les Éditions Histoire Québec, 2010 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ Histoire Québec Vol 16, no2:Layout 1 10-10-28 15:49 Page 36 HISTOIRE QUÉBEC VOLUME 16 NUMÉRO 2 2010 The World’s Smallest Republic : Indian Stream by Carl Gustafson Rev. Carl Gustafson (1908-97) spent almost his entire life in the Eastern Townships. He attended school in Waterville and went on to McGill University, where he graduated with degrees in Arts and Divinity. He was ordained by the United Church of Canada and served many congregations in the Townships over a span of more than half a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-1975 Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game, "Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975" (1975). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 301. https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/301 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game 284 State Street, Augusta, Maine 04330 0££K) auie^M 'e+snSny '+994S 9+p+S VQZ FISHING LICENSES Commissioner of Indian Affairs stating that the person described is an awe0 pue sauaijsij pupguj jo juauupiedaQ auip^Aj Indian and a member of that tribe. For this purpose, an Indian shall RESIDENT NONRESIDENT be any member on tribal lists of the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy 16 years and older . $ 6.50 Season: age 16 and older $15.50 Tribes, or a person on the membership list of the Association of Combination ............. 10.50 12-15 years inclusive .. 2.50 Aroostook Indians and who has resided in Maine for at least 5 years. ‘ 3-day . ’ 6.50 15-day* “ ........................ 10.50 “ Leave or furlough . 2.50 7-day ................................. 7.50 3-day ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Crossings Like Habitat Connectivity, Streams Require Continuity to Support the Movement of Aquatic Organisms
    MANAGING STATE LANDS FOR WILDLIFE Stream Crossings Like habitat connectivity, streams require continuity to support the movement of aquatic organisms. Many species need different habitats for feeding, breeding, and shelter. The ability to move up or down stream is required for the natural dispersal of individuals. Disruption of stream continuity can result in the loss and degradation of habitat, block wildlife movement, and disrupt the ecological processes that occur in streams over time. Intersections of streams and roads—or stream crossings—have been historically designed to pass water under a road without consideration of stream continuity. Flow variability, natural sediment transport, and aquatic organism passage are overlooked. Characteristic problems of culverts include undersized, shallow, or perched crossings resulting in low or high flow, unnatural bed materials, scouring, erosion, clogging, and ponding. Bridges generally have a lesser impact on streams but, if improperly designed, can still result in sediment deposition and/or streambed degradation. Good stream crossing for wildlife are also good for people. Proper design and placement reduce erosion and damage to roads, infrastructure, and personal property. Click here for more information on Fish and Game’s Fish Habitat Program. Click here for New Hampshire’s Stream Crossing Guidelines and related resources from New Hampshire’s Department of Environmental Services. Mascoma WMA (Canaan) This property contained a 15 foot culvert used to cross the 60-80 foot wide Mascoma River that bisects the property. The culvert was installed by the former landowner. The constriction caused by the culvert led to significant riverbank erosion both up and downstream, forced the river to change course, and deterred fish passage.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Granite State Ambassadors Great North Woods
    New Hampshire Granite State Ambassadors www.NHGraniteStateAmbassadors.org Regional Resource & Referral Guide: Great North Woods Region Use this document filled with local referrals from Granite State Ambassadors & State Welcome Center attendants as an informational starting point for guest referrals. For business referrals, please reference your local brochures & guides. Hidden Gems: ● Baby Flume Gorge, 1212 NH 26 West, Dixville Notch – short walk inside Dixville Notch State Park to a waterfall within a small, narrow gorge. The Cascade Brook Falls are across the road about ¼ mile. (https://www.nhstateparks.org/visit/state-parks/dixville-notch-state- park) ● Beaver Brook Falls, NH 145, Colebrook – About 2.5 miles north of Colebrook on the right- hand side of the road. (https://www.chamberofthenorthcountry.com/blog/best-bets-north- country-waterfalls) ● Pondcherry Wildlife Refuge, Airport Rd., Whitefield – Off NH 115, hiking trails, owned and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in partnership with NH Audubon and NH Department of Fish and Game. (http://www.nhaudubon.org/pondicherry-wildlife-refuge/) ● Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge and NH 16 North along the Thirteen Mile Woods for moose watching and beautiful landscapes. (https://www.fws.gov/refuge/umbagog/) Curiosity: ● North Hill Cemetery, off NH 145, Stewartstown Hollow in Stewartstown – Grave of Metallak was the last Indian living in NH who had not gone to Canada or assimilated into early 19th century American culture. https://www.chamberofthenorthcountry.com/historical- attractions.html) ● 45th Parallel, NH 145, Clarksville – Located in triangular plot at junction of NH 145 and Clarksville Pond Road. At this point you stand at longitude 71 degrees, 24 degrees west from Greenwich, England and half-way between the equator and the north pole.
    [Show full text]
  • People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 2003 People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J. Michor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Michor, Daniel J., "People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine" (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 188. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/188 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVlRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE BY Daniel J. Michor B.A. University of Wisconsin, 2000 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2003 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor of History, Advisor Howard Segal, Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology Alexander Huryn, Associate Professor of Aquatic Entomology PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE By Daniel J. Michor Thesis Advisor: Dr. Richard Judd An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) May, 2003 The quality of a river affects the tributaries, lakes, and estuary it feeds; it affects the wildlife and vegetation that depend on the river for energy, nutrients, and habitat, and also affects the human community in the form of use, access, pride, and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States 1960
    Surface Water Supply of the United States 1960 Part 1 -A. North Atlantic Slope Basins, Maine to Connecticut Prepared under the direction of E. L. HENDRICKS, Chief, Surface Water Branch GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1701 Prepared in cooperation with the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and with other agencies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. PREFACE This report was prepared by the Geological Survey in coopera­ tion with the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and with other agencies, by personnel of the Water Resources Division, L. B. Leopold, chief, under the general direction of E. L. Hendricks, chief, Surface Water Branch, and F. J. Flynn, chief, Basic Records Section. The data were collected and computed under supervision of dis­ trict engineers, Surface Water Branch, as follows: D. F. Dougherty............................................................. Albany, N. Y. G. S. Hayes................................................................. Augusta, Maine John Horton................................................................. Hartford, Conn. C. E. Knox................................................................... Boston, Mass, HI CALENDAR FOR WATER YEAR 1960
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Breaching of the Edwards Dam, July 1, 1999 The Kennebec River is the third largest river in Maine consolidating the flows from many large lakes in north-central Maine, then flowing south through agricultural areas and small towns and cities of the central part of the state to merge with the Androscoggin River at Merrymeeting Bay. Introduction Geography The Kennebec River originates at Moosehead Lake flowing 145 miles to Merrymeeting Bay where it joins the Androscoggin River, then to the Atlantic Ocean at Phippsburg and Georgetown. The upper Kennebec flows from Moosehead Lake about 4 miles before reaching Indian Pond, the first of many impoundments. Flowing out of Indian Pond through Harris Dam, a major hydroelectric station, its passes through the Kennebec gorge then runs south draining into Wyman Lake, and through Wyman Dam, another large hydroelectric impoundment. From there it passes through urban and industrial areas of Madison, Skowhegan, Waterville-Winslow, and, with the Biomonitoring Retrospective 78 Maine DEPLW1999-26 Dec. 1999 removal of the Edwards Dam in Augusta in July, 1999, the Kennebec head of tide now occurs between Augusta and Sidney. The river eventually empties into Merrymeeting Bay in Richmond. Six major tributaries enter the river: the Moose River is the major tributary of Moosehead Lake, Dead River, Sandy River, Sebasticook River, Messalonskee Stream and Cobbosseecontee Stream. The basin covers approximately 5,893 square miles with approximately 3,850 miles of rivers and streams. Basin Summary Statistics Biomonitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Maine State Legislature
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) STATE OF MAINE 117TH LEGISLATURE SECOND REGULAR SESSION A REVIEW OF STATE DAM ABANDONMENT AND REGISTRATION LAWS AND FEDERAL DAM LICENSING LAWS Staff Study January 1996 Prepared at the request of the Legislative Council Staff: Jill Ippoliti, Legislative Analyst John G. Kelley, Legislative Analyst Office of Policy & Legal Analysis 13 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333, Rm.101/107/135 (207) 287-1670 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Sunnnary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Part A: Questions and answers concerning Maine dams and state laws relating to dams ................................................................................................................ 5 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5 B. Background on dams in Maine ..................................................................................... 5 C. Dam maintenance ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    NEW ENGLAND CLEAN ENERGY CONNECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-2155 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY WASHINGTON, DC JANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................. V FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ V TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... V ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ VII 1. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PRESIDENTIAL PERMITS .................................................................................................... 2 1.2 SCOPE OF DOE’S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ................................................................ 2 1.3 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS .......................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above-Referenced Standard Individual Permit Application [i.e., CENAE-RDC; NAE-2017-01342]” (July 7, 2020) and Environmental Assessment Addendum; Central Maine Power Company (CMP); New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC); File No. NAE-2017-01342
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Upper Connecticut River Valley of New Hampshire, 1750-1820
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2012 From Forest to Freshet: The Development of the Upper Connecticut River Valley of New Hampshire, 1750-1820 Madeleine Beihl University of New Hampshire - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Beihl, Madeleine, "From Forest to Freshet: The Development of the Upper Connecticut River Valley of New Hampshire, 1750-1820" (2012). Honors Theses and Capstones. 32. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/32 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Forest to Freshet: The Development of the Upper Connecticut River Valley of New Hampshire 1750-1820 Madeleine Beihl Senior Honors Thesis University of New Hampshire Spring 2012 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 The Early Years, Pre-1750 .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Maine Woods: 1902 Edition (Title: in Pine Tree Jungles) Bangor and Aroostook Railroad
    Bangor Public Library Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl Maine Railroad Publications Railroads in Bangor and Vicinity 1902 In the Maine Woods: 1902 Edition (Title: In Pine Tree Jungles) Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Follow this and additional works at: http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/railroad_pubs Recommended Citation Bangor and Aroostook Railroad, "In the Maine Woods: 1902 Edition (Title: In Pine Tree Jungles)" (1902). Maine Railroad Publications. 28. http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/railroad_pubs/28 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Railroads in Bangor and Vicinity at Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Railroad Publications by an authorized administrator of Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright ;902 By the Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. A copy of this book will be sent to any address on receipt of ten cents by GEo. M. IloUGHToN, Traffic '.tanager, Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co., Bangor, Maine. WRITTEN A!'ill ARRANGt:I> nv FREI> II. CLIFFORD, BA!'iGUR, MF. ' CONTENTS. Page ON THE \\'AY IN •....... 7 \VHERE BIG FIS!! ARE PLENTY 9 FISH LAWS IN BRIEF . ..... 39 TABLE OF B. & A. FISHING WATERS How HUDNUTT lIELl'ED, A STORY BY HOLMAN F. DAY 49 WHERE THE BIG GAME HIDE SS SHIPMENT OF GAME, 1901 ... GAME LAWS IN BRIEF ......... THE llIGl!-SHOULDERED Hu:>:T, A STORY RY \\'INFH:l.D M. THOMPSON..... 79 JUNGLE VOYAGES HY CA:-OOE ••••... .. .. Ss CA~IPING AND CANOEING . .......... II3 EQl'IPMENT ...•.......•.....•••••..•...................•.....•........ 117 \Vo~IES IN THE \\'oons, BY .MARY AI.DES IIOPKISS .........•...........
    [Show full text]