Guarding Shariah from Liberalism: a Critical Overview on Liberal Islam Network in Indonesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guarding Shariah from Liberalism: a Critical Overview on Liberal Islam Network in Indonesia See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348019487 GUARDING SHARIAH FROM LIBERALISM: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW ON LIBERAL ISLAM NETWORK IN INDONESIA Conference Paper · December 2020 CITATIONS READ 0 1 2 authors: Mualimin Mochammad Sahid Malki Ahmad Nasir USIM | Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia Universitas Islam Bandung 100 PUBLICATIONS 12 CITATIONS 15 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: article View project Modul Adat Perpatih Patuh Syariah di Malaysia View project All content following this page was uploaded by Mualimin Mochammad Sahid on 31 December 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The 3rd International Conference of the Postgraduate Students and Academics in Syariah and Law 2020 (INPAC 2020) "Syariah and Law Approach in Solving Contemporary Issues" GUARDING SHARIAH FROM LIBERALISM: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW ON LIBERAL ISLAM NETWORK IN INDONESIA i*Mualimin Mochammad Sahid, iiMalki Ahmad Nasir iFaculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) iiFaculty of Dakwah, Universitas Islam Bandung (UNISBA) *(Corresponding Author) Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The history has witnessed different efforts from other parties to go against Islam as a religion of peace. Through its teachings and values, Islam appears as a religion that propagates universal message of mercy and peace for all mankind regardless their race, colour and religion. Shariah as a law containing all guidance for Muslims in their daily life must be put above everything. However, challenges faced by Islam in different parts of the world have been occurring until today such secularism, liberalism, and other concepts and thoughts. This paper aims at explaining how Shariah can be guarded from the threat of liberalism which occurred in Indonesia through the movement called Jaringan Islam Liberal (Liberal Islam Network, abbreviated as JIL). The paper elaborates in details main issues related to the network which include among others: history its emergence, key figures, concepts and activities, as well as its missions and agenda. Based on qualitative method of research using library research referring to primary and secondary resources gathered, the paper analyse the concept and thoughts followed and disseminated by the Liberal Islam Network followers and further study their movement in order to expose the faults and deviations as portrayed by this movement which emerged for the first time in early 2001. Among the results of the research are as follow: The Liberal Islam Network (JIL) was a result of Modernity and its philosophical thought which influenced young Indonesian Muslims. It is funded by Western foundations and disseminates the ideas of Secularization, Westernization, Pluralism, Inclusivism, and Feminism, and Liberalism. Finally, the paper asserts that to guard Shariah from deviated thoughts is to understand Islam from the true interpretation of Islam by reliable Muslim Scholars. Keywords: Shariah, Liberalism, Liberal Islam Network, JIL, overview Introduction Islam is a monotheistic religion and teachings of obedience to Allah SWT and His Messenger, who teaches truth and goodness to humanity. Islam specifically means submission to Allah SWT, but also it includes all forms of goodness and perfection. And since Islam has represented all forms of virtue, then it must also have included the value of freedom, namely freedom in a more appropriate and correct meaning according to its size, not freedom in an unlimited sense, because freedom without limits is certainly only worthy of being possessed by the creator which is not burdened with the gift of reason. Freedom according to Islam is freedom to choose something as long as the choice is still within the scope of the truth, namely the truth desired by Allah SWT as in the guidance of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Muslims are free to choose any role or position in their lives, as long as it is not a role or position that is prohibited by Islam itself, because indeed the diversity of roles or positions within the Muslim body will actually make them complement each other and strengthen each other. So, basically, Muslims themselves already have the basic rights in the form of freedom in choosing their own way of life, which is a way of life under the auspices of Islam. They are always free to choose the various roles available within the scope of Islamic truth. So that, precisely when Islam is imbued with the term liberal, which means 'free', it is precisely at that moment that the meaning of freedom in Islam seems to still have flaws, as if, so far Islam has not been able to free its people from bondage, and as if -the affix is an expression of protest over the imperfection of 108 The 3rd International Conference of the Postgraduate Students and Academics in Syariah and Law 2020 (INPAC 2020) "Syariah and Law Approach in Solving Contemporary Issues" Islam, even though Islam itself has been declared its perfection by Allah SWT. Therefore, when Islam is precisely imbued with such liberal terms, then basically it is not Islam in the true and perfect sense. And in this case, the Liberal Network 'Islam' is a group that imposes that liberal term on Islam. This group consists of people who yearn for 'freedom' within the scope of the Islamic religion. It is a community of freedom lovers who prioritize the use of reason in an effort to interpret the values of Islamic teachings. They believe that any teachings in Islam that are not in accordance with the calculation of human reason will have to be criticized or even have to be replaced with new and different patterns if necessary. it is this group that always prioritizes the rules of reason, even if they have to put aside the basic rules that have been mentioned in the Qur'an and as-Sunnah. The Facts of Liberalism In Indonesia Indonesia is home to the largest Muslim communities in the world. (BPS, 2010) Although 88% of its population is Muslim, Indonesia is not an Islamic state. Moreover, the Indonesian Muslims are well-known for their moderation and being tolerant regardless the existence of local Islamic groups that are involved in the violent religious conflicts in the recent days. These groups insist on the implementation of Islamic law in the post-authoritarian President Soeharto era. After the emergence of global issue (i.e. Modernity) in the West and its diffusion all over the world, including Indonesia and - like other countries was affected by this dangerous idea which many Muslims are not aware of the real agenda and goals behind it. (Effendy, 2003) As a result, the issue of moderation of Islam in Indonesia emerged. This is not merely because of historical factors, but it is also the result of ongoing debates on how to reconcile Islam with modernity, as well as increasing number of young people of Indonesia who are studying in the Western universities, and also who are influenced in which they brought the 'new' ideas when going back to their home land. This paper deals with the Liberal Islam Network (Jaringan Islam Liberal JIL) through discussing the history of its emergence, concepts, deviations propagated by its activists and followers, as well as refutations on these deviations. (Assyaukanie, 2014) The network (JIL) emerged in the middle of 2001 as a forum to disseminate liberal interpretations of Islam. It seems through the name (liberal) and (Islam) that, there is confusion or even wrong understanding when Islam is mixed with liberalism. That is because Islam literally means submission, i.e. the submission to ALLAH's commands; while on the other hand, Liberalism holds the meaning of freedom in everything. It is very unfortunate that The Liberal Islam Network (JIL) has interpreted Islam wrongly due to the limitation of genuine Islamic knowledge of its activists who have been influenced very much by western thoughts and philosophy. In other word, it can simply be said that the followers, participants, and activists of this network do not have enough, good, and proper Islamic knowledge to understand Islam. Or it is due to the influence of western philosophical thought which is usually contradicted to Islam. There are some learned, scholars and activists who demonstrate their arguments in order to show their understanding wrongly or not enough and proper knowledge on Islam, such as (Saifullah, 2018) This wrong and deviated understanding can be seen through their slogans when trying to disseminate the concept of Liberal Islam, as follow: (http://islamlib.com/en/aboutus.php). "-The openness of ijtihad's gates in the entire aspects,- emphasize on the ethical- religious spirit, not the literal meaning of the text, the relative, open, and plural truth, stand behind the minorities and the oppressed,- freedom of belief and faith,- the separation of ukhrawi (heavenly) vis-à-vis duniawi (worldly) authority, and the religious vis-à-vis political authority". The ideas proposed by JIL activists mostly deal with the compatibility of Islam and democracy, interpretation and explanation to these current issues, they are completely adopting Western understanding or affected by western ideology. (Nasir, 2004) Therefore, it is not strange if they are facing a lot of rejections and refusals from conservative Muslims in Indonesia who want to save Islam from any deviation and to rectify wrong understanding towards the teaching of Islam. 109 The 3rd International Conference of the Postgraduate Students and Academics in Syariah and Law 2020 (INPAC 2020) "Syariah and Law Approach in Solving Contemporary Issues" Due to anxiety of many Muslims in Indonesia towards the danger of thoughts brought by The Liberal Islam Network (JIL), it is very important to highlight the issues raised by this network and to explain the right stand how Muslims should know.
Recommended publications
  • The Formation of Liberal and Anti-Liberal Islamic Legal Thinking in Indonesia Akh
    Akh. Muzakki IS EDUCATION DETERMINANT? The Formation of Liberal and Anti-liberal Islamic Legal Thinking in Indonesia Akh. Muzakki The University of Queensland, Australia Abstract: Liberalism and anti-liberalism are two increasing- ly prominent but staunchly opposing streams of Islamic legal thinking in Indonesia. This article analyses the formation of each of the two through an examination of the role of formal education. It focuses on organic intellectuals during two periods, the New Order and the reformasi. Challenging the strongly-held thesis of the determinant role of education, this article argues that both liberal and anti-liberal Islamic legal thinking in Indonesia is a result of not only the intellectual formation in the sense of academic training and access to education and knowledge, but also the sociological background and exposure in building a new epistemic community in an urban context. As a theoretical understanding of sociolo- gical background and exposure, the concept of epistemic community deserves to be taken as an analytical framework in addition to education for the analysis of the formation of the two contesting bents of Islamic legal thinking in Indonesia. Keywords: Liberalism, anti-liberalism, Islamic legal think- ing, education, epistemic community. Introduction In his controversial speech entitled “The Necessity of Islamic Renewal Thinking and the Problem of the Integration of the Ummah” on 2 January 1970, Madjid argued for a dynamic approach to Islam which requires reinterpretation of Islamic teachings in context with place and time. In more elaborate ways, he further argued that Islamic values move in line with the spirit of humanitarianism which promotes 280 JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Volume 01, Number 02, December 2007 Is Education Determinant? the dignity of Mankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Sejarah Munculnya Pemikiran Islam Liberal Di Indonesia 1970-2015 the Birth of Liberal Islamic Thought in Indonesia 1970 - 2015
    Sejarah Munculnya Pemikiran Islam Liberal…(Samsudin dan Nina Herlina Lubis) 483 SEJARAH MUNCULNYA PEMIKIRAN ISLAM LIBERAL DI INDONESIA 1970-2015 THE BIRTH OF LIBERAL ISLAMIC THOUGHT IN INDONESIA 1970 - 2015 Samsudin dan Nina Herlina Lubis Universitas Padjajaran, Indonesia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Naskah Diterima: 15 April 2019 Naskah Direvisi: 20 September 2019 Naskah Disetujui : 28 September 2019 DOI: 10.30959/patanjala.v11i3.522 Abstrak Kemajuan yang dicapai oleh negara Barat dalam bidang ilmu pengetahuan, teknologi, dan ekonomi, berakar pada trilogi liberalisme, pluralisme, dan sekularisme. Atas dasar itulah, beberapa tokoh Islam Indonesia ingin memajukan umatnya dengan trilogi tersebut. Dalam perjalanannya, tokoh Islam seperti Nurcholish Madjid dan Ulil Abshar menuai kritik dari Rasjidi dan Atiyan Ali. Puncaknya adalah ketika MUI mengeluarkan fatwa mengharamkan Islam liberal. Bagaimana gambaran sejarah masuk Islam liberal di Indonesia? Mengapa terjadi polemik Islam liberal di Indonesia? Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, metode yang digunakan adalah metode sejarah, meliputi heuristik, kritik, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, sejarah Islam liberal di Indonesia terbagi ke dalam empat tahap, yaitu: Tahap awal ketika masih menyatu dengan pemikiran neo-modernisme. Kedua, pembentukan enam paradigma Islam liberal. Ketiga adanya kritik dan evaluasi pemikiran Islam liberal. Kemudian sebab terjadinya polemk pemikiran Islam liberal disebabkan oleh perbedaan paradigma berfikir dan metodologi memahami ajaran Islam dalam melihat realitas yang terjadi di masyarakat pada masa kontemporer. Kata kunci: Islam liberal, sejarah, tokoh liberal, polemik. Abstract The progress achieved by Western countries in the fields of science, technology and economics is rooted in liberalism, pluralism and secularism. For this reason, some Indonesian Muslim intellectuals want to reform their people accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • PERGERAKAN JARINGAN ISLAM LIBERAL (JIL) DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2001-2005 Cahyaningrum Tri Agus Tina
    1 PERGERAKAN JARINGAN ISLAM LIBERAL (JIL) DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2001-2005 Cahyaningrum Tri Agus Tina Abstract This article aim to explain some light on liberal Islamic movements in Indonesia, with specific reference to the Liberal Islam Network (JIL). The background formation of Liberal Islam Network is the strengthening influence of orientalists in Islamic studies and the rise of fundamentalist Islamic groups that tend to be radical in overcome the problem post new order. Liberal Islam Network which initiated Ulil Abshar Abdalla and active on March 8, 2001. Liberal Islamic thought are reflected in several important agenda of JIL, which include: the political agenda (secularism), religious pluralism, emancipation of women, freedom of opinion and freedom of expression. Liberal Islamic thought development strategies implemented with financial assistance of The Asia Foundation through study and discussion forums, print media such as Gatra, Tempo, Jawa Pos to electronic media (radio news agency 68H) and internet with the official website www.islamlib.com. The effect of Liberal Islam Network in Indonesia is a confirmation of theology the secular state idea and religious pluralism. The aims of Liberal Islam Network to promote the ideals of civil society (freedom of civil society), the development would have a response and critique of various parties. PENDAHULUAN Sekularisme sebagai akar liberalisme masuk ke Indonesia melalui proses penjajahan, khususnya oleh pemerintah Belanda. Prinsip negara sekular telah menjadi dasar pemerintah untuk bersikap netral terhadap agama, artinya tidak memihak salah satu agama atau mencampuri urusan agama (Aqib Suminto, 1985: 27). Setelah kedatangan Snouck Hurgronje, pemerintah Hindia- Belanda mempunyai kebijakan yang jelas mengenai masalah Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Godly Nationalism in Indonesia
    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2014;56(3):591–621. 0010-4175/14 # Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2014 doi:10.1017/S0010417514000267 Productive Intolerance: Godly Nationalism in Indonesia JEREMY MENCHIK International Relations, Boston University In Islamic jurisprudence one of the duties of the state is hirasatud-din wa siyasatud- dunya: guarding religion and managing the world. Guarding religion from the people who would tarnish, damage, and destroy it. In Indonesia, there is religious freedom but there cannot be freedom to defile religions that are followed by other citizens, either by harassment, undermining doctrine, or through activities that cause social con- flict as was done by the deviant sects. ——Maman Abdurrahman, Chair of Persatuan Islam (Persis)1 INTRODUCTION Since the fall of President Soeharto in 1998, Indonesia has played host to a curious form of internecine conflict: Islamist vigilante groups have been attack- ing members of a small, socially marginal Muslim sect called Ahmadiyah. Ahmadiyah is a controversial sect with followers around the globe. Many Sunni Muslims charge that Ahmadis are not true Muslims due to their belief that their founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, was a prophet. The vigilantes claim that Ahmadiyah is damaging Islam by propagating the belief that another prophet came after Muhammad and have dubbed Ahmadiyah a “deviant sect,” invoking a 1965 presidential decree that demands all Indone- sians adhere to one of the six religions sanctioned by the state: Islam, Acknowledgments: This article is based on two years of field research in Indonesia, from Septem- ber 2008 to October 2010. Archival material is from the National Library, the National Archive, and the archived publications of the organizations Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and Persatuan Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Studies and Islamic Education in Contemporary Southeast Asia
    ISLAMIC STUDIES AND ISLAMIC EDUCATION IN CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA i ii ISLAMIC STUDIES AND ISLAMIC EDUCATION IN CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA Editors KAMARUZZAMAN BUSTAMAM-AHMAD PATRICK JORY YAYASAN ILMUWAN iii Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-In-Publication Data Islamic studies and Islamic education in contemporary Southeast Asia / editors: Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad, Patrick Jory ISBN 978-983-44372-3-7 (pbk.) 1. Islamic religious education--Southeast Asia. 2. Islam--Education--Southeast Asia. I. Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad. II. Jory, Patrick. 297.77 First Printed 2011 © 2011 Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad & Patrick Jory Publisher: Yayasan Ilmuwan D-0-3A, Setiawangsa Business Suites, Taman Setiawangsa, 54200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – for example, electronic, photocopy, recording – without prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed review. The opinions expressed in this publication is the personal views of the authors, and do not necessary reflect the opinion of the publisher. Layout and cover design: Hafizuldin bin Satar Font: Goudy Old Style Font size: 11 pt Printer: Gemilang Press Sdn Bhd iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS his book grew out of a three-day workshop jointly held by the Regional Studies TProgram, Walailak University, and the Department of Cross-Cultural and Re- gional Studies, Copenhagen University, in Nakhon Si Thammarat, southern Thai- land, in 2006. The theme of the workshop was, “Voices of Islam in Europe and Southeast Asia”. Its aim was to gather leading scholars in the fields of Islamic Stud- ies from diverse disciplinary backgrounds to discuss contemporary developments in the study of Islam and Muslim societies in these two regions.
    [Show full text]
  • SOEHARTO INDONESIAN ISLAM: Examining the Intellectual Base of Liberal and Anti-Liberal Islamic Movement
    CURRENT DEBATES IN THE POST- SOEHARTO INDONESIAN ISLAM: Examining the Intellectual Base of Liberal and Anti-liberal Islamic Movement Akh. Muzakki State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia; PhD student at the School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics (HPRC), the University of Queensland, Australia Abstract This article discusses intensively the current debate between those who support and against liberalism within pluralized Indonesian Muslims. The two groups are represented by JIL (Jaringan Islam Liberal) and MD (Media Dakwah). The author compares three fundamental aspects of religious interpretations: epistemological assumptions, methodological framework, and subject-matter. Epistemological assumptions deal with philosophical foundations that are employed by JIL and MD as principles to understand Islam. Methodological framework means the way the two groups understand and interpret Islam and its teaching based on their philosophical foundations. In terms of subject-matter, the author discusses six issues, namely (1) ijtihad; (2) approaches to text; (3) the meaning of truth; (4) the minority and the oppressed; (5) freedom of religion; and (6) mundane and spiritual authority. From the three fundamental aspects of religious interpretations that are compared, the author concludes that JIL is a group of Muslims who understand Islam by implementing liberalism, while MD (DDII) represents a group of Muslim who promote conservatism, purification, and anti-liberalism within Indonesian Islam. Keyword: pluralism, liberalism, purification, religious interpretation Akh. Muzakki A. Introduction Following the fall of Soeharto from power in 1998, Indonesians began to enjoy the power of free speech. People developed almost all public discourses, religious, social, and political, without fear of state retaliation.
    [Show full text]
  • REASONING of LIBERAL ISLAM: a STUDY on ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES in LIBERAL ISLAM NETWORK JAKARTA Yusa‘ Farchan :: 180-198
    Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion Volume 01 No. 02 December 2016 ISSN : 2502 ± 5465 / e-ISSN: 2443 ± 3859 Accredited by LIPI Number: 752/AU2/P2MI-LIPI/08/2016 Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion Volume 01 No. 02 December 2016 Analisa is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Office of Religious Research and Development Ministry of Religious Affairs Semarang Indonesia. Analisa has been accredited by Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI/the Indonesian Institute of science) as an academic journal. It was stated in a decree number: 752/AU2/P2MI-LIPI/08/2016. This journal specializes in these three aspects; religious life, religious education, religious text and heritage. Analisa aims to provide information on social and religious issues through publication of research based articles and critical analysis articles. Analisa has been published twice a year in Indonesian since 1996 and started from 2016 Analisa is fully published in English as a preparation to be an international journal. Since 2015, Analisa has become Crossref member, therefore all articles published by Analisa will have unique DOI number. Advisory Editorial Koeswinarno Religious Research and Development, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Semarang, Indonesia Editor in Chief Sulaiman Religious Research and Development, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Semarang, Indonesia International Editorial Boards Florian Pohl, Emory University, United State of America Alberto Gomes, La Trobe University, Melbourne Australia Nico J.G. Kaptein, Leiden University, Leiden
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Publications on Indonesian Islam
    Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Vol. 167, no. 1 (2011), pp. 140-153 URL: http://www.kitlv-journals.nl/index.php/btlv URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-101379 Copyright: content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ISSN: 0006-2294 REVIEW ESSAY LUTHFI ASSYAUKANIE Recent publications on Indonesian Islam Abdurrahman Wahid (ed.), Ilusi negara Islam: Ekspansi gerakan Islam transnasional di Indonesia. Jakarta: Wahid Institute, 2009, 321 pp. ISBN 9789799873774. Adian Husaini, Membendung arus liberalisme di Indonesia: Kumpulan catatan akhir pekan. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2009, price IDR 67,500 (paperback). Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Islam dalam bingkai keindonesiaan dan kema- nusiaan: Sebuah refleksi sejarah. Bandung: Maarif institute for Culture and Humanity, 2009, 338 pp. ISBN 9789794335567. Daud Rasyid, Melawan sekularisme. Jakarta: Usamah Press, xii + 194 pp. ISBN 9789791982801. Haedar Nashir, Gerakan Islam syariat: Reproduksi salafiyah ide- ologis di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Agama dan Peradaban Muhammadiyah, xxxvii + 652 pp. ISBN 9789792605044. Husein Muhammad, Islam agama ramah perempuan: Pembelaan kiai pesantren. Yogyakarta: LKiS, Cirebon: Fahmina Institute, 2004, lxvi + 344 pp.ISBN 979338171x, price IDR 35,500. M. Imdadun Rahmat, Arus baru Islam radikal: Transmisi revival- isme Islam Timur Tengah ke Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2005, xx + 384 pp. ISBN 9797810739, price IDR 44,800. M. Zaki Mubarak, Genealogi Islam radikal di Indonesia: Gerakan, pemikiran dan prospek demokrasi. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2008, xxvii + 384 pp. ISBN 9793330716. Siti Musdah Mulia, Menuju kemandirian politik perempuan: Upaya mengakhiri depolitisasi perempuan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Kibar Press, xx + 369 pp. ISBN 979-9885663, price IDR 48,000. Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 07:46:11AM via free access Book reviews 141 Sukron Kamil and Chaider S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of #Indonesiatanpajil Youth Movement and the Fall of Liberal Islam on Cyberspace Akmal* University of Indonesia Email: [email protected]
    The Rise of #IndonesiaTanpaJIL Youth Movement and the Fall of Liberal Islam on Cyberspace Akmal* University of Indonesia Email: [email protected] controversy. Several Muslim scholars consider it as nothing more than a continuation of the concepts previously delivered by Nurcholish Madjid or Harun was brought by its supporters to cyberspace, namely through the social media. This strategy has resulted in a rather dramatic change, prompting the emergence to be effective in discrediting the liberal Islam movement. Through observations and the measures it has taken to confront the liberal Islam. This work will also highlight several developments in the liberal Islam movement itself, resulting in the conclusion that liberal Islam is in fact can be seen as a discourse that has failed to develop in the cyberspace. Keywords: Indonesia. kontroversi. Banyak sarjana Muslim menganggapnya hanya sebatas kelanjutan Jl. Margonda Raya, Pondok Cina, Kecamatan Beji, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16424. Volume 15, Number 2, November 2019, 363-374 364 Akmal yaitu melalui media sosial. Strategi ini telah menghasilkan perubahan yang agak dramatis, mendorong munculnya gerakan pemuda Muslim yang menyebut gerakan Islam liberal. Melalui pengamatan di dunia maya, penelitian ini berupaya untuk menghadapi Islam liberal. Karya ini juga akan berupaya menyoroti sejumlah perkembangan dalam pergerakan Islam liberal itu sendiri, sehingga menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa Islam liberal pada kenyataannya dapat dipandang sebagai sebuah wacana yang telah gagal berkembang di dunia maya. Kata Kunci Indonesia. ince its emergence in Indonesia in the early 2000s, liberal Islam has always been a topic of controversy. Several Muslim Sscholars have put forward criticisms of liberal Islam through various articles in the mass media, scientific papers and books.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab Iii Jaringan Islam Liberal Dan Karakter Pemikirannya
    62 BAB III JARINGAN ISLAM LIBERAL DAN KARAKTER PEMIKIRANNYA Dalam bab II peneliti menjelaskan secara luas kajian teori tentang gender, seksualitas dan LGBT yang menjadi subyek penelitian. Selanjutnya pada bab III ini peneliti akan mendiskripsikan obyek penelitian secara detail, yaitu tentang profile Jaringan Islam Liberal khususnya pada komunitas di jalan Utan Kayu. Harapan yang nantinya peneliti dapatkan pada pembahasan bab III ini adalah sejarah munculnya dan karakteristik Jaringan Islam Liberal, yang hingga saat ini semakin popular dengan pemikiran Islam kontemporer yang dianggap kontroversial oleh masyarakat Islam umumnya. A. Latar Belakang Kelahiran Jaringan Islam Liberal JIL merupakan lembaga non pemerintah yang memiliki konsen utama di bidang pemikiran sosial keagamaan. Kemunculan organisasi ini di awal tahun 2001 lebih didorong oleh kenyataan menguatnya kelompok-kelompok fundamentalisme Islam di Indonesia. Kemunculan paham fundamentalisme ini tampak semakin menghawatirkan ketika diikuti dengan munculnya laskar-laskar digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 63 Islam, dengan menggunakan atribut-atribut Islam justru memprovokasi masyarakat untuk melakukan tindak-tindak kekerasan.108 Hal tersebut menstimulus JIL yang dimotori oleh sejumlah kaum muda, dengan berlatarbelakang pesantren namun berpandangan liberal, mengibarkan tekad untuk memfokuskan kegiatan pada tiga aspek utama. Pertama, membendung munculnya fundamentalisme Islam. Kedua, mencegah munculnya kekerasan yang mengatasnamakan agama (Islam). Ketiga, mengembangkan demokrasi, mempromosikan pentingnya menghargai HAM dan mengembangkan paham Islam Liberal yang toleran, pluralis dan emansipatif.109 Nama “Islam Liberal “ menggambarkan prinsip-prinsip yang dianut, yaitu Islam yang menekankan kebebasan pribadi dan pembebasan dari struktur sosial politik yang menindas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mu'tazilites, Harun Nasution and the Liberal Islam Network
    Liberal Islam in Indonesia – From Revelation to Reason and Freedom: the Mu’tazilites, Harun Nasution and the Liberal Islam Network Philip John Gill Bool Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts by Research (by Thesis Only) February 2010 Faculty of Arts, Asia Institute, Indonesian Program The University of Melbourne i Abstract This thesis is a study of liberal Islam in Indonesia. In particular, it is an examination of how freedom and reason have been expressed in the Mu’tazilite movement of the 8th century, in the writings of the 20th century Indonesian Muslim scholar, educator and neo‐Mu’tazilite Harun Nasution and in the principles and program of the Liberal Islam Network formed in Jakarta in 2001. According to Asaf Fyzee, who in all probability first coined the term ‘liberal Islam’, freedom is humanity’s greatest gift. Writing in 1963, he asserted that Islam as a religious doctrine does not allow freedom of thought and that unless it does so, the faith will continue to be fossilized. Noted scholars of liberal Islam, Charles Kurzman and Leonard Binder, have also observed that there is a perception that freedom and Islam are not compatible. It will be argued here that in fact freedom and reason have occupied a significant if often unorthodox position in Islam since at least the 8th century in the theology of the Mu’tazilite movement. It is the Mu’tazilites who should be the starting point for any study of liberal Islam rather than developments in the faith since the 18th century, upon which scholars such as Binder and Kurzman have focused.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interplay Between U.S. Foreign Policy and Political
    THE BROOK I NG S PROJEC T ON U.S. RELA ti ON S W it H T HE IS LAM I C WORLD WORKING PAPER Number 3, September 2008 THE IN T ERPLAY BE T WEEN U.S. FORE I GN POL I CY AND POLitiCAL IS LAM IN PO st -SOEHAR T O INDONE si A M. Syafi’i Anwar at BROOKINGS Saban Center or Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World (IWR) Working Papers present prelim- inary conclusions or work-in-progress based on research by Saban Center (IWR) scholars. Working papers are meant to stimulate de- bate and discussion on difficult policy questions. As with all Brook- ings papers, Working Papers do not necessarily reflect the views of the Saban Center, the Brookings Institution, or the Institution’s board of trustees. All Saban Center (IWR) Working Papers are available online at www.brookings.edu/sabancenter, and comments are welcome. Other Saban Center (IWR) Working Papers include: The Conquest of Muslim Hearts and Minds? Perspectives on U.S. Re- form and Public Diplomacy Strategies by Abdelwahab el-Affendi Arab and American Think Tanks: New Possibilities for Cooperation? New Engines for Reform? by Ezzat Ibrahim T HE SA B AN CEN T ER F OR MI DDLE EA st POL I CY A T BROOKINGS iii About the Author Mohammad Syafi’i Anwar is the Execu- representing a group of Asian states. The experts tive Director of ICIP (International Center for Is- finished a study on international complementary lam and Pluralism). Prior to his current position, standard with regard to “Racism, Racial Discrimi- Anwar was Editor-in-Chief of two leading Islamic nation, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance.” He magazines in Indonesia (Panji Masyarakat, 1986- was also Ford Foundation Visiting Fellow at The 1988) and Ummat (1995-1999).
    [Show full text]