DOCSLIB.ORG

Oatmeal Opp to TRO 7.1.12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oatmeal Opp to TRO 7.1.12 Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document23 Filed07/01/12 Page1 of 30 1 Kurt Opsahl (SBN 191303) [email protected] 2 Matthew Zimmerman (SBN 212423) 3 [email protected] Corynne McSherry (SBN 221504) 4 [email protected] ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 5 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 6 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 7 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 8 Venkat Balasubramani (SBN 189192) [email protected] 9 Focal PLLC 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 10 Seattle, WA 98104 11 Telephone: (206) 529-4827 Facsimile: (206) 260-3966 12 Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Inman 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 CHARLES CARREON, ) Case No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC ) 18 Plaintiff, ) ) 19 DEFENDANT MATTHEW INMAN’S v. ) ) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S 20 ) APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY MATTHEW INMAN, INDIEGOGO, INC., ) RESTRAINING ORDER 21 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, AND AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, ) ) Date: TBD 22 and Does 1 – 100, ) Defendants, Time: TBD ) Courtroom: 5 – 17th Floor 23 ) and ) Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 24 ) KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the ) 25 State of California, ) ) 26 A Person To Be Joined If ) ) 27 Feasible Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 )) 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC INMAN’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document23 Filed07/01/12 Page2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 II. STATEMENT OF FACTS ......................................................................................................... 2 3 4 A. Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 5 B. The Lawsuit ....................................................................................................................... 6 6 III. ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................ 7 7 A. Mr. Carreon is Not Likely to Succeed on the Merits. ....................................................... 7 8 1. The First Amendment Fully Protects Mr. Inman’s Fundraising Campaign ............ 8 9 (a) Mr. Inman is Engaged in Non-Commercial Speech ........................................ 9 10 (b) Mr. Inman’s BLGCB Campaign is Protected Speech ..................................... 9 11 2. Mr. Carreon’s Section 17500 Claim Also Fails as a Matter of Law ...................... 11 12 (a) Mr. Inman is Not a Commercial Fundraiser .................................................. 11 13 (b) Mr. Inman Did Not Make Any Misrepresentations ...................................... 12 14 (c) Mr. Carreon’s Donation Does Not Give Him an Injury in Fact Necessary 15 for a Section 17500 Claim ............................................................................ 15 16 3. Mr. Carreon Does Not Have Standing to Assert a Violation of Government 17 Code 12599. ........................................................................................................... 16 18 B. Mr. Carreon Is Not Likely To Suffer Irreparable Harm In The Absence Of Preliminary Relief ......................................................................................................... 19 19 1. Possibility of Harm is Not Sufficient ..................................................................... 20 20 2. Mr. Carreon Has Only a Financial Injury .............................................................. 21 21 3. An Injunction is Not an Available Remedy ........................................................... 21 22 C. The Balance of Equities Tips in Mr. Inman’s Favor ....................................................... 22 23 24 D. An Injunction Is Not In The Public Interest .................................................................... 23 25 E. Mr. Carreon is Required to Obtain a Bond ...................................................................... 23 26 IV. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 23 27 28 i No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC INMAN’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document23 Filed07/01/12 Page3 of 30 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 1 FEDERAL CASES 2 3 Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) ............................................................................................................. 12 4 Bridges v. California, 5 314 U.S. 252 (1941) ............................................................................................................... 9 6 Campbell Soup Co. v. ConAgra, Inc., 7 977 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1992) ................................................................................................... 21 8 Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971) ............................................................................................................... 10 9 Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Def. & Educ. Fund, Inc., 10 473 U.S. 788 (1985) ............................................................................................................... 9 11 Dworkin v. Hustler Magazine, 12 867 F. 2d 1188 (9th Cir. 1989) ............................................................................................. 10 13 eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, 547 U.S. 388 (2006) ............................................................................................................. 21 14 15 Goldie’s Bookstore, Inc. v. Superior Court, 739 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1984) ................................................................................................ 21 16 Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 17 485 U.S. 46 (1988) ......................................................................................................... 10, 11 18 Illinois ex rel. Madigan v. Telemarketing Assocs., Inc., 19 538 U.S. 600 (2003) ............................................................................................................. 15 20 Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm’n v. NFL, 634 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1980) ........................................................................................ 21, 22 21 22 NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982) ....................................................................................................... 10, 11 23 Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc., 24 944 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1991) ................................................................................................ 21 25 Riley v. Nat’l Fed’n of Blind of N.C., Inc., 26 487 U.S. 781 (1988) ......................................................................................................... 9, 15 27 Sammartano v. First Judicial Dist. Ct., 303 F.3d 959 (9th Cir. 2002) ................................................................................................ 22 28 ii No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC INMAN’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document23 Filed07/01/12 Page4 of 30 United States v. Assoc’d Press, 1 52 F. Supp. 362 (S.D.N.Y. 1943), aff’d, 326 U.S. 1 (1945) ................................................. 11 2 Vill. of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 3 444 U.S. 620 (1980) ............................................................................................................... 9 4 Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008) ....................................................................................................... 7, 20, 23 5 6 STATE CASES 7 Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 135 Cal. App. 4th 663 (2006) ............................................................................................... 22 8 Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Superior Court, 9 137 Cal. App. 4th 842 (2006) ............................................................................................... 17 10 Hardman v. Feinstein, 11 195 Cal. App. 3d 157 (1987) ................................................................................................ 18 12 Holt v. College of Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons, 61 Cal. 2d 750 (1964) ..................................................................................................... 17, 18 13 14 In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal. 4th 298 (2009) .................................................................................................... 16, 21 15 Kasky v. Nike, Inc., 16 45 P.3d 243 (Cal. 2002) .......................................................................................................... 9 17 Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court, 18 51 Cal. 4th 310 (2011) .......................................................................................................... 16 19 L.B. Research & Education Foundation v. UCLA Foundation, 130 Cal. App. 4th 171 (2005) ............................................................................................... 18 20 21 Mirkin v. Wasserman, 5 Cal. 4th 1082 (1993) .......................................................................................................... 16 22 Patton v. Sherwood, 23 152 Cal. App. 4th 339 (2007) ............................................................................................... 18 24 San Diego etc. Boy Scouts of America v. City of Escondido, 25 14 Cal. App. 3d 189 (1971) .................................................................................................. 18 26 27 28 iii No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Counseling and Legal Strategy in the Digital Age Fall 2015 Seminar
    Bavitz, Christopher Ritvo, Dalia Counseling and Legal Strategy in the Digital Age Fall 2015 seminar Counseling and Legal Strategy in the Digital Age CLASS #1 Monday, September 14, 2015 Introduction: Clients' Goals, Lawyers' Tools, and Solving Problems Overview: • Assessing clients' primary goals and needs • Legal "issue spotting" meets practical "need spotting" • Counseling to avoid legal problems and legal threats • Ways to solve problems other than through litigation • Strategic considerations in threatening, avoiding, pursuing and defending litigation • Sending and responding to takedown notices, cease and desist letters and other threats Required Readings: Grimmelmann • Grimmelmann, pp. 57-66 ("Technical Primer: The Internet") • Grimmelmann, pp. 530-539 ("Section 512," Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. 572 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (N.D. Cal. 2008)) Cease & Desist Letters and Responses • October 17, 2007 cease & desist letter from Wal-Mart (counsel: Gary J. Rinkerman, Baker & Hostetler LLP) to BFADS.NET, read all • Platinum Equity LLC-San Diego Reader Dispute: 1. Don Bauder, " If You Use This, I'll Sue (Links to an external site.)," San Diego Weekly Reader, July 15, 2009, read all 2. June 26, 2009 cease & desist letter (Links to an external site.) from Platinum Equity LLC (counsel: Martin D. Singer, Lavely & Singer) to San Diego Reader, read all • December 6, 2011 letter (Links to an external site.) from Facebook (counsel: Joseph Cutler, Perkins Coie) to Hunter Moore, read all Bavitz, Christopher Ritvo, Dalia Counseling and Legal Strategy in the Digital Age Fall 2015 seminar • Louis Vuitton - Penn Law Intellectual Property Group controversy: 1. February 29, 2012 cease & desist letter (Links to an external site.) from Louis Vuitton (counsel: Michael Pantalony) to Dean Michael Fitts, read all 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Oatmeal, Bears, and Npes: Ensuring Fair, Effective, and Affordable Copyright Enforcement Through Copyright Insurance Evan Mcalpine
    Intellectual Property Brief Volume 4 | Issue 3 Article 2 7-10-2013 Of Oatmeal, Bears, and NPEs: Ensuring Fair, Effective, and Affordable Copyright Enforcement Through Copyright Insurance Evan McAlpine Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/ipbrief Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation McAlpine, Evan. "Of Oatmeal, Bears, and NPEs: Ensuring Fair, Effective, and Affordable Copyright Enforcement Through Copyright Insurance." Intellectual Property Brief 4, no. 3 (2013): 19-35. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Intellectual Property Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Of Oatmeal, Bears, and NPEs: Ensuring Fair, Effective, and Affordable Copyright Enforcement Through Copyright Insurance This article is available in Intellectual Property Brief: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/ipbrief/vol4/iss3/2 Of Oatmeal, Bears, and NPEs: Ensuring Fair, Effective, and Affordable Copyright Enforcement Through Copyright Insurance by Evan McAlpine1 1ABSTRACT link-backs or attribution. Accordingly, he requested the site’s administrator remove the infringing copies via a Increasing copyright infringement and DMCA takedown notice.6 high litigation costs have left many independent After fruitlessly sending
    [Show full text]
  • Dowthwaite, Liz (2018) Crowdfunding Webcomics
    CROWDFUNDING WEBCOMICS: THE ROLE OF INCENTIVES AND RECIPROCITY IN MONETISING FREE CONTENT Liz Dowthwaite Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2017 Liz Dowthwaite Crowdfunding Webcomics: The Role of Incentives and Reciprocity in Monetising Free Content Thesis submitted to the School of Engineering, University of Nottingham, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. © September 2017 Supervisors: Robert J Houghton Alexa Spence Richard Mortier i To my parents, and James. ii Doug Savage, 2007 http://www.savagechickens.com/2007/05/morgan-freeman.html “They’re not paying for the content. They’re paying for the people.” Jack Conte, founder of Patreon “We ascribe to the idealistic notion that audiences don’t pay for things because they’re forced to, but because they care about the stuff that they love and want it to continue to grow.” Hank Green, founder of Subbable iii CROWDFUNDING WEBCOMICS – LIZ DOWTHWAITE – AUGUST 2017 ABSTRACT The recent phenomenon of internet-based crowdfunding has enabled the creators of new products and media to share and finance their work via networks of fans and similarly-minded people instead of having to rely on established corporate intermediaries and traditional business models. This thesis examines how the creators of free content, specifically webcomics, are able to monetise their work and find financial success through crowdfunding and what factors, social and psychological, support this process. Consistent with crowdfunding being both a large-scale social process yet based on the interactions of individuals (albeit en mass), this topic was explored at both micro- and macro-level combining methods from individual interviews through to mass scraping of data and large-scale questionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Storytelling Era: Digital Work and Professional Identity in the North American Comic Book Industry
    A New Storytelling Era: Digital Work and Professional Identity in the North American Comic Book Industry By Troy Mayes Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Media, The University of Adelaide January 2016 Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................. vii Statement ............................................................................................ ix Acknowledgements ............................................................................. x List of Figures ..................................................................................... xi Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background and Context .......................................................... 2 1.3 Theoretical and Analytic Framework ..................................... 13 1.4 Research Questions and Focus ............................................. 15 1.5 Overview of the Methodology ................................................. 17 1.6 Significance .............................................................................. 18 1.7 Conclusion and Thesis Outline .............................................. 20 Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework and Methodology ..................... 21 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 21
    [Show full text]
  • I Driverless Vehicles' Potential Influence on Cyclist and Pedestrian
    Driverless Vehicles’ Potential Influence on Cyclist and Pedestrian Facility Preferences THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Julian Armstrong Blau, BA Graduate Program in City and Regional Planning The Ohio State University 2015 Master's Examination Committee: Gulsah Akar, advisor Jack Nasar Jason Sudy i Copyright by Michael Julian Armstrong Blau 2015 ii Abstract Research in the field of autonomous vehicle technology focuses on the enhanced safety and convenience it will likely convey to vehicle occupants. This thesis seeks to establish a new and equally important line of inquiry that addresses the same implications for cyclists and pedestrians. It is well-established that motorized traffic volume and speed have a strong influence on non-motorized agents’ behavior and facility preference but whether this will continue to be the case in a driverless environment remains unknown. A stated-preference survey was crafted asking respondents to select their preferred facility in various scenarios with and without the presence of driverless vehicles and on street types of varying motorized traffic volumes and speeds. An ordered logit model was estimated to illustrate that street type had a very strong influence on cyclists’ preferences for more separated facilities as traffic volume and speed increased. The presence of driverless vehicles significantly amplified this trend. Preferences for bike intersection features, pedestrian facilities, and pedestrian crossing behavior are also examined. Infrastructure and policy recommendations are presented as well as suggestions for future research in this nascent field of study.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2014 NASFA Shuttle
    Te Shutle August 2014 The Next NASFA Meeting is Saturday 16 August 2014 at the Regular Location d Oyez, Oyez d ! RIP Louise Kennedy The next NASFA Meeting will be 6P Saturday 16 August by Mike Kennedy 2014, at the regular meeting location—the Madison campus of ! Willowbrook Baptist Church (old Wilson Lumber Company I thought a considerable time about whether to run an building) at 7105 Highway 72W (aka University Drive). obituary for my mother in this issue. Most local folks—and Please see the map on page 2 if you need help finding it. many who aren’t—were informed by various means within AUGUST PROGRAM the first 24 hours. Still, there are some Shuttle readers who Unfortunately, the previously-planned program by Les John- may want to know and who haven’t heard in other ways. So, son fell prey to a conflict. Les has asked for a rain check and despite this being the hardest thing I’ve ever written, here will talk about Mars Exploration and Rescue Mode (his latest goes. book) at a to-be-determined future date. The new program for Louise Maples Kennedy died on Monday 4 August 2014. August is TBD at press time. She is survived by me; my brother, Jim; Jim’s wife, Tracey; AUGUST ATMM and their two sons, Joshua and Aaron. Mom was one of nine The After-The-Meeting Meeting host is TBD at press time, children and was the last survivor of her siblings. She was but there’s a high probability that it will take place at the buried Thursday 7 August beside Dad, William David “Bill” church.
    [Show full text]
  • GOETZ FITZPATRICK LLP RONALD D. COLEMAN Rcoleman@Goetzfitz
    Case 2:12-cv-08443-GW-MRW Document 35 Filed 01/11/13 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:468 1 GOETZ FITZPATRICK LLP RONALD D. COLEMAN 2 [email protected] One Penn Plaza, Suite 4401 3 New York, NY 10119 Telephone: 212.695.8100 4 Facsimile: 212.629.4013 5 Counsel for Defendant JOHN PATRICK FREY 6 7 BROWN WHITE & NEWHOUSE LLP KENNETH P. WHITE (Bar No. 238052) 8 [email protected] 333 South Hope Street, 40th Floor 9 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406 Telephone: 213. 613.0500 10 Facsimile: 213.613.0550 11 Local Counsel for Defendant JOHN PATRICK FREY 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 NADIA NAFFE, an individual, Case No.: CV12-08443-GW (MRWx) 16 Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. George H. Wu 17 v. 18 JOHN PATRICK FREY, an individual, DEFENDANT JOHN PATRICK and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, FREY’S NOTICE OF MOTION 19 a municipal entity, AND MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND THROUGH SEVENTH 20 Defendants. CAUSES OF ACTION OF THE FIRST AMEND COMPLAINT 21 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1) 22 23 Hearing Date: February 14, 2013 Time: 8:30 a.m. 24 Courtroom: 10 25 Complaint Filed: October 2, 2012 26 27 28 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(1) 773086.1 RLG 077 Case 2:12-cv-08443-GW-MRW Document 35 Filed 01/11/13 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:469 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 14, 2013, at 8:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Enlightened Entrepreneurship: the Success of Elon Musk
    Enlightened entrepreneurship: the success of Elon Musk Department of Economics & Business Chair of Entrepreneurship, Technology and Innovation Supervisor: Professor Andrea Prencipe Candidate: Mathias Mair ID 180631 Academic year 2015/2016 1 Table of contents: Introduction 1- What is entrepreneurship? 1.1- History of entrepreneurship 1.2- Behavioural patterns in entrepreneurs 1.3- Communication fundamentals in entrepreneurs 1.4- Financing 2- History of Musk’s rise, his life and career 2.1- Early life 2.2- Career beginnings: Zip2 and PayPal 2.3- SpaceX: the multiplanetary dream 2.4- The transportation adventure: Tesla Motors 2.5- The transportation adventure: Hyperloop 2.6- Solar City and Open AI 3- List of Musk’s keys to success 3.1- Main points of his philosophy 3.2- Family, philanthropy and awards 4- Conclusion 5- Bibliography 2 Introduction The purpose of this thesis is to analyse in depth the strategies, methods and actions that allowed Elon Musk to place himself as a top tier entrepreneur. Starting from the true meaning of entrepreneurship, I moved into taking to account the points in common between Musk and what a nowadays entrepreneur needs to be capable of. I followed by underlining the focal achievements reached in his career and what he might have used to get to reach his goals, mostly his personality traits. At last I demonstrated how he affected the culture of this days and how he rewrote the definition of pathfinder in the entrepreneurial world. 1 What is entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship is defined as the process of starting and running a business in a strategic way in order to make a profit from a product or service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uses and Gratifications Behind Farmers Using Twitter
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Theses from the College of Journalism and Journalism and Mass Communications, College Mass Communications of 5-2011 An iPhone in a Haystack: The Uses and Gratifications Behind Farmers Using Twitter Sarah Van Dalsem University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismdiss Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, and the Mass Communication Commons Van Dalsem, Sarah, "An iPhone in a Haystack: The Uses and Gratifications Behind armersF Using Twitter" (2011). Theses from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications. 11. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismdiss/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journalism and Mass Communications, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AN IPHONE IN A HAYSTACK: THE USES AND GRATIFICATIONS BEHIND FARMERS USING TWITTER by Sarah Van Dalsem A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: Journalism and Mass Communications Under the Supervision of Professor Sue Burzynski Bullard Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2011 AN IPHONE IN A HAYSTACK: THE USES AND GRATIFICATIONS BEHIND FARMERS USING TWITTER Sarah Van Dalsem, M.A. University of Nebraska, 2011 Adviser: Sue Burzynski Bullard The fast-growing social media site, Twitter, is growing in popularity among Americans from all walks of life, including farmers who are using it to share information with other farmers and consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • (SBN 159477) Rtang
    Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document22-1 Filed07/01/12 Page1 of 3 1 DURIE TANGRI LLP RAGESH K. TANGRI (SBN 159477) 2 [email protected] MARK A. LEMLEY (SBN 155830) 3 [email protected] EUGENE NOVIKOV (SBN 251316) 4 [email protected] 217 Leidesdorff Street 5 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 6 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 7 Attorneys for Defendant INDIEGOGO, INC. 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 CHARLES CARREON, Case No. 3:12-cv-03112-EMC 13 Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF RAGESH TANGRI 14 v. 15 MATTHEW INMAN; INDIEGOGO, INC.; NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION; 16 AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY; AND DOES 17 1-100, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF RAGESH K. TANGRI / CASE NO. 3:12-CV-03112-EMC Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document22-1 Filed07/01/12 Page2 of 3 1 I, Ragesh Tangri, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a member of the State Bar of California and counsel of record for Defendant 3 Indiegogo Inc. in the above-captioned litigation. 4 2. On June 28, 2012, at 4:55 p.m., Plaintiff Charles Carreon served an application for a 5 temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. A 6 true and correct copy of the email transmitting Carreon’s papers is attached to this declaration as Exhibit 7 A. 8 3. At 7:02 p.m. that evening, Carreon served a revised version of his supporting declaration 9 and exhibits.
    [Show full text]
  • Gov.Uscourts.Cand.256114.25.0.Pdf Download
    Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document25 Filed07/01/12 Page1 of 5 1 Kurt Opsahl (SBN 191303) [email protected] 2 Matthew Zimmerman (SBN 212423) 3 [email protected] Corynne McSherry (SBN 221504) 4 [email protected] ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 5 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 6 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 7 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 8 Venkat Balasubramani (SBN 189192) [email protected] 9 Focal PLLC 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 10 Seattle, WA 98104 11 Telephone: (206) 529-4827 Facsimile: (206) 260-3966 12 Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Inman 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 CHARLES CARREON, ) Case No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC ) 18 Plaintiff, ) ) 19 DECLARATION OF KURT OPSAHL IN v. ) ) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S 20 ) APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY MATTHEW INMAN, INDIEGOGO, INC., ) RESTRAINING ORDER 21 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, AND AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, ) ) Date: TBD 22 and Does 1 – 100, ) Defendants, Time: TBD ) Courtroom: 5 – 17th Floor 23 ) and ) Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 24 ) KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the ) 25 State of California, ) ) 26 A Person To Be Joined If ) ) 27 Feasible Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 )) 28 No.: 12-cv-3112-EMC OPSAHL DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Case3:12-cv-03112-EMC Document25 Filed07/01/12 Page2 of 5 1 I, Kurt Opsahl, of full age, certify, declare and state: 2 1. I am an attorney at law, duly licensed and admitted to practice in the State of 3 California.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BINDEX 09/12/2017 1:17:21 Page 284 Index A AIR MILES, 251–252 Accuracy, speed vs., 201–202 Al-Asady, Zaid, 193 Actions, by leaders, 19 Alexis, Michael, 199 Activism, on social media, Alexis, Michaela, 38, 150 256–258 Algar, Trevor, 237 AdBlocker, 164–165 ALS Association (ALSA), ADT Canada, 12–14 256–258 Advertising: “ALS Ice Bucket Challenge,” changes in creation of, 225 256–258 false, 110–111 Amazon, 275–277 on Google Home, 27 Amazon.com, 134 Super Bowl,COPYRIGHTED 140 Amazon MATERIAL Go, 276 Advertising campaigns, plagiarism American Airlines, 188–189 in, 112–115 American Cancer Society, 102 Advisors: Anderson, Ami, 96 and crowdfunding platforms, 135 Andrew, Jill, 98 seeking out, 63 Apple, 1, 2, 162–163 Agrawal, Miki, 62 ARF David Ogilvy Awards, 196 AirBnb, 206 Artwork, online theft of, 36–38 284 BINDEX 09/12/2017 1:17:21 Page 285 Index 285 Ashley Home Furniture Store, Beautification app, at Samsung, 73–74 78–79 Associated Press, 39 Beauty and the Beast (film), 26–27 Astley, Amy, 117 Be Bangles, 143–145 Atari, 93, 94 Belhouse, Nadine, 150 Atomic Spark Video, 159–160 Benefit corporations, 22 Attention: Bensi, 90 to broader market, 188–189 Benson, Michael, 170–173 to positive social media postings, Best Western, 206–208 254–255 Bezos, Jeff, 196, 275–277 Attleboro, Massachusetts, 96 Big Ass Fans, 75 Audience: Big Cheese Club promotion, 122 building, via social media, 101 Bissell, 232 for Super Bowl Bissell, Kathy, 232 advertisements, 140 BitTorrent, 212–213 Audits, company, 6–8 Blaskie, Erin, 24–25 Australia Post, 143–145 Bloomberg, 89, 275 Autism, Chuck E.
    [Show full text]