University of California Riverside
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Regulation of Gene Expression in the Drosophila Olfactory System Varies Widely With Stimulus, Duration, Age, and Development A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cell, Molecular, and Developmental Biology by Christi Ann Scott March 2019 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Anandasankar Ray, Chairperson Dr. Anupama Dahanukar Dr. Karine Le Roch Dr. Patricia Springer Copyright by Christi Ann Scott 2019 The Dissertation of Christi Ann Scott is approved: _______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Scientific contributions: The text of this dissertation is in part reproduced with permission of the Liscensor through PLSclear as is appears in: Scott, Christi A., and Anupama Dahanukar. 2014. “Sensory Coding of Olfaction and Taste.” Behavioral Genetics of the Fly (Drosophila Melanogaster) 2: 49. Dr. Anupama Dahanukar planned and co-wrote the chapter. This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. I am grateful to the following collaborators who contributed to work in this dissertation: Dr. Anandasankar Ray supervised and directed the research that forms the basis for this dissertation. Dr. Crystal Pontrello contributed equally to the design and library preparations for the brain activity regulated gene (ARG) experiments and performed the memory experiments. Dr. Anupama Dahanukar contributed to the planning and funding of the brain ARG project. For the diacetyl experiments, Dr. Sachiko Haga-Yamanaka performed the biochemical assays, cell culture assays, neurodegeneration assays. Dr. Sarah Perry prepared some of the transcriptome libraries. Dr. Crystal Pontrello performed some of the mouse experiments. Dr. Meera Goh Nair helped to plan and assisted with the mouse exposure experiments. For the axon guidance work, Dr. Christine Pham prepared the RNA for the pdm3 mutant experiments. I would like to thank Dr. Thomas Girke for guidance in bioinformatics analysis used in all RNA-seq experiments. iv Personal acknowledgements: I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. Anandasankar Ray for his unwavering support during my graduate school tenure. Anand, your enthusiasm for science is both unparalleled and infectious. Every time I struggled with any aspect of my research, one meeting in your office left me feeling like I was on my way to a Nobel prize. I will forever be grateful to you for your wild ideas and your guidance. My dissertation committee has been very supportive throughout graduate school. Thank you to Dr. Anupama Dahanukar for your continued support of my research. I value all of our regular conversations both science and non-science alike. Thank you to Dr. Karine Le Roch and Dr. Patricia Springer. I appreciate all of the time you have committed and the clear feedback you always provided. Thank you Dr. Crystal Pontrello, my bench mate for so many years. When we first started our project, I don’t think either of us quite knew how it would turn out. After all of these years and all of our reanalysis, I am so glad that I had a teammate that never gave up. Though I could go on, I’ll end it here because I don’t want this to be an agarose situation. I am grateful to the members of the Ray and Dahanukar labs for all of our scientific discussions and the non-stop entertainment. Tom “Good” Guda, I am thankful for all of the work you put in to keep our lab running and your daily positive attitude. And a special shout-out to my lunch buddies over the years: Adriana, Arun, Greg, Mikkal, Perry, Sean Michael Boyle, and Zev. My midday break wouldn’t have been the same without each of you. I’d also like to thank my new-age pen pals, MamaD and Bear. I hope to reunite with you in person one day, but getting to know you was a definite highlight. Thank you v also to Taylor Swift. These projects began with Speak Now and continued through the Reputation era. Much of the work presented here was done to the tune of “Enchanted” and “Style” ,among others and “Don’t Blame Me” has fueled much of the writing process. To my family, thank you for putting up with my never-ending college career. Mom, thank you for always supporting my education, starting with walking me to school everyday in kindergarten. I’m pretty sure this solidifies my spot as your favorite child. Thank you to my brothers and sisters: Jimmy, Jill, Mrrto, Brian, Melissa, Michelle, Andy, Lindsey, Ashley, and Billy and my 22 (and counting) nieces and nephews, with a special shout-out to Jessica and Aiden for coming to my defense. Thank you to the Rowden/Alexander family especially Tommy, Cyndi and Glenn for always making me feel like part of the family over the holidays. Thank you to my additional extended family, the Medina/Lomeli/Dillon/Franco group. Again, you guys never fail to make me feel as though I’m part of the family and I look forward to many more parties and trips to Mexico. Thank you to Irma Medina for always welcoming me into your home. Tu comida y tu amor ayudarme a todo, muchas gracias. I have been lucky to have two lifelong best friends, who I love more than I can say. Adriana Lomeli, I am so grateful I had someone to share this experience with. Whether you were supporting my work or with me swatching eyeshadows in Sephora, being your best friend is rewarding every day. And finally to my original ride-or-die, Leah Timme. From BC to PhD, I couldn’t have asked for a better partner to see me through it. It’s been a great 20 (!) years, I can’t wait for the next 20. vi For my father Pop, I’d like to think you’d place this 2nd among your proudest moments. We both know my first tuna takes the top spot. I miss you every day. vii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Regulation of Gene Expression in the Drosophila Olfactory System Varies Widely With Stimulus, Duration, Age, and Development by Christi Ann Scott Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Cell, Molecular, and Developmental Biology University of California, Riverside, March 2019 Dr. Anandasankar Ray, Chairperson The Drosophila olfactory system is an ideal model for the investigation of principles of gene regulation in the nervous system. Within this system, we characterize gene expression changes in response to short-term and long-term exposure to odorants. Additionally, we examine the contributions of two transcription factors to the development of this chemosensory system. Short-term exposure to odorants and light leads to neural activation and induction of activity regulated genes (ARGs). ARG induction in neurons in can lead to long-term changes at the level of the synapse. Such alterations in synaptic structure/function are thought to underlie important cellular processes such as synaptic plasticity and long-term memory formation. We have conducted a genome-wide study of genes in the Drosophila central nervous system induced after brief periods of sensory stimulation and have identified 352 genes whose viii expression increases in response to neural activity. The regulation of these genes is altered with increasing age. Furthermore, we demonstrate that loss of a histone deacetylase alters neuronal response to sensory stimuli, suggesting a mechanism of epigenetic regulation. We extended our transcriptome analysis to the fly antenna and found that the genes increased in response to fruit odorants differ significantly from the genes induced by the repellent DEET. In response to long-term exposure to the odorant diacetyl, we find that dramatic changes in gene expression can, in part, be attributed to inhibition of histone deacetylases. This non-traditional action of diacetyl slows neurodegeneration in the fly model for Huntington’s Disease. We conclude with an analysis of two transcription factors acj6 and pdm3 and find they regulated proper chemosensory receptor and axon guidance gene expression in the developing Drosophila olfactory system. ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………iv DEDICATION………………………………………...………………………………………….vii LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………xii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………xiii CHAPTER I. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ORGANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DROSOPHILA OLFACTORY SYSTEM…………………………………………………1 Overview…………………………………………………………………………………1 Chemosensory neurons and receptors……………………………………………….2 Central representation of chemosensory activity…………………………………….8 Sophisticated processing by chemosensory neurons……………………………..15 Development of the olfactory system………………………………………………..18 Concluding remarks…………………………………………………………………...21 References……………………………………………………………………………..23 Figures………………………………………………………………………………….31 Tables…………………………………………………………………………………...35 CHAPTER II. DYSREGULATION OF THE SENSORY ACTIVITY-REGULATED TRANSCRIPTOME IN THE BRAIN WITH AGING OR HDAC6 KNOCKOUT…………...40 Overview………………………………………………………………………………..40 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..41 Results………………………………………………………………………………….42 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………49 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………………..52 References……………………………………………………………………………..56 Figures………………………………………………………………………………….60 Tables…………………………………………………………………………………...87 CHAPTER III. ACTIVITY-REGULATED GENE