Nelenite, a Manganese Arsenosilicate of the Friedelite Group, Polymorphous with Schallerite, from Franklin, New Jersey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nelenite, a Manganese Arsenosilicate of the Friedelite Group, Polymorphous with Schallerite, from Franklin, New Jersey MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE, JUNE 1984, VOL. 48, PP. 271-5 Nelenite, a manganese arsenosilicate of the friedelite group, polymorphous with schallerite, from Franklin, New Jersey PETE J. DUNN Department of Mineral Sciences, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA AND DONALD R. PEACOR Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA ABSTRACT. Nelenite, (Mn,Fe)16Si1203o(OH)'4[As~+06 typically related to schallerite. We have examined (OHh], is a polymorph of schallerite and a member of the this material in light of current knowledge of the friedelite group. X-ray diffraction patterns can be indexed crystal chemistry of friedelite and schallerite and on a supercell with a = 13.418(5) and c = 85.48(8) A, have found it to be a unique and valid species. The space group R3m, but by analogy with TEM results on mcGillite and friedelite, the structure is based on a old name,jerroschallerite, is a misnomer in that this one-layer monoclinic cell with a 23.240, b 13.418, material is not the Fe-analogue of schallerite and = = does not have the schallerite structure. Hence, we c = 7.382 A, {3= 105.21°, and space group C21m. Chemi- cal analysis yields Si02 31.12, FeO 17.12, MgO 0.12, have renamed it to avoid confusion. ZnO 3.63, MnO 29.22, As203 12.46, H20 6.42, sum = We take pleasure in naming this new mineral 100.09 %. Analysis of a number of samples indicates that nelenite in honour of Joseph A. Nelen, Chemist at Fe substitutes for Mn up to 5.8 of the 16 octahedrally the Smithsonian Insitution, in recognition of his coordinated cations, but that the Si: As ratio is constant. contributions to the chemistry of minerals, in The strongest lines in the X-ray powder diffraction particular his analytical studies of the complex pattern (d, 1110) are: 2.552,/00; 2.878,70; 1.677,60; 3.55,60; arsenosilicates of manganese which are found at 1.723,50. Nelenite is brown in colour with a vitreous luster and Franklin and Sterling Hill. The name and the perfect {OOOI}cleavage, which easily distinguishes it from species were approved by the IMA Commission on schallerite. The Mohs' hardness is approximately 5. The New Minerals and Mineral Names, prior to pub- density is 3.45 g/cm3 (calc.) and 3.46 g/cm3 (obs.). Nelenite lication. The holotype material is deposited in the is uniaxial negative with E = 1.700 and w = 1.718 (both Smithsonian Institution under catalog no. C6219. 10.004). Nelenite was formerly known asferroschallerite, Co type samples are in the Smithsonian Institution which is a misnomer. It was found in the Franklin Mine, under catalog no. R7824 and at Harvard University Franklin, Sussex County, New Jersey, in the 1920s. It under catalog no. H 92791-a. Additional speci- occurs in several parageneses, associated with actinolite, mens repose in the private collections of John tirodite, albite, garnet, feldspars, and several members of Baum, John Kolic, and in the Spex-Gerstmann the stilpnomelane group in coarse-grained assemblages with pegmatitic texture and a breccia likely derived from collection. this rock. Nelenite is named in honour of Joseph A. Nelen, Designation of the holotype is non-ambiguous chemist at the Smithsonian Institution. due to Lawson Bauer's habit of writing the chemi- cal analysis directly on the unused portion of the A SCHALLERITE-LIKE mineral was described by analysed sample. We note here that the cotype Bauerand Berman (1930) and namedferroschaller- samples R7824 and H-92791-a are identical in all itein allusion to the high iron content, relative to details to the holotype, are extremely close in manganese, and the chemical similarity to schaller- composition, and all three can be fitted together, ite, Mn16Si12030(OH)14[As~+06(OHh]' It was indicating they were once a single sample. We re-examined by Frondel and Bauer (1953), who retain the terms holotype and cotype, even though considered it to be a variety of friedelite, MngSi6 they may seem to be redundant because of the 0ls(OH)10' considered at that time to be poly- reconstruction, so as to indicate precisely which @ Copyright the Mineralogical Society 272 P. J. DUNN AND D. R. PEA COR fragment of this breccia was used for crystallo- and mcGillite was shown (Donnay et al., 1980) to be graphic and physical and optical measurements. an apparent twelve-layer polytype with c = 85.66A Physical and optical properties. Nelenite is light (although it differs in composition in having 2CI to medium brown in colour and transparent, with replacing 2(OH)). Dunn et al. (1981) showed that no apparent colour-zoning. The cleavage is perfect, specimens of friedelite, which supposedly were parallel to {0001}, and is developed only with three-layer polytypes, gave mcGillite-like diffrac- moderate difficulty. Cleavage plates are flat and tion patterns, and thus these phases differed only in highly lustrous, and it is this quality and appear- composition in the anion sites, but not in the nature ance of the cleavage that immediately distinguishes of their polytypic repeats, although diffuseness in nelenite from the other members of the friedelite the diffraction pattern of friedelite indicated dis- group, which have cleavage fragments with slightly order in the stacking sequence. or grossly warped and curved surfaces. The streak Iijima (1982a, b) has shown, using high-resolution is light brown. The hardness (Mohs) is approxi- TEM lattice imaging techniques in which the mately 5. The lustre of cleavage surfaces is vitreous; sequences of layers are directly imaged, that the that of fracture surfaces is slightly resinous and mcGillite crystal structure is actually a complex decidedly duller than cleavage surface lustre. The stacking of several polytypes. The basic repeat unit density, determined using heavy liquid techniques, consists of one of two kinds of layer, both of which is 3.46 g/cm3, in excellent agreement with the have monoclinic geometry and which are desig- calculated value of 3.45 g/cm3 and 3.44 g/cm3 value nated IMl and 1M2' A third layer type, which is obtained by Bauer and Berman (1930). theoretically possible, was not observed. Iijima Optically, nelenite is uniaxial (-) with indices notes that the 1M 1 layer (which has space group of refraction e = 1.700 and w = 1.718 C:1::0.004), C2/m) is dominant and that it is repeated with measured in sodium light. It occasionally exhibits regular occurrences of 120° rotation twinning on biaxial behaviour with 2V near 0° and is pleochroic (001), giving rise to a variety of poly types. This layer with e = colourless and w = light brown. Nelenite has dimensions a = 23.279, b = 13.498, c = is not discernibly fluorescent in ultraviolet radia- 7.390 A, and fJ = 105.3°. A critical point is that tion, nor is it phosphorescent. Iijima implies that the two-layer polytype has a X -ray crystallography. Single crystal photographs structure that is not identical to that of schallerite; of nelenite were obtained using precession camera he notes that the relation between the three-layer techniques. These photographs are nearly identical polytype (which is trigonal) and friedelite (which is to those described by Dunn et al. (1981) for trigonal) remains to be investigated. The significant friedelite which, in turn, are nearly identical to conclusion is that because nelenite is shown to be those of mcGillite (Donnay et al., 1980). The isostructural with friedelite, its structure must be principal differences are that photographs of based largely on the IM1 layers. Such units are friedelite and nelenite exhibit diffuseness in reflec- different from those of schallerite. The relation tions, which are spread out parallel to c*, while between schallerite and friedeIite is therefore not a mcGillite gives sharp reflections. The relations in polytypic one, sensu strictu. diffraction patterns were noted by direct compari- Ozawa et al. (1983) have observed similar rela- son of equivalent photographs obtained for the tions for friedelite and mcGillite, obtaining dimen- different species. The structures of nelenite and sions for a one-layer monoclinic unit cell close to friedelite thus appear to be identical and, in turn, those of Iijima. They further note that friedelite is identical to that of mcGilIite except that they are the disordered equivalent of mcGillite. The status relatively disordered in stacking sequence. As the of mcGillite, friedelite and, by analogy, nelenite true symmetry of mcGilIite and friedelite (and thus appears to be well established. therefore nelenite) is a complex matter that is not Because the single-crystal X-ray diffraction unambiguously determinable by X-ray diffraction patterns of nelenite, mcGillite, and friedelite are alone, we give here a discussion of the relations nearly identical, nelenite must also have a structure among these closely related phases. based on a one-layer unit. Donnay et al. (1980) Manganpyrosmalite, schallerite, and friedelite interpreted the X-ray diffraction data for mcGillite were until recently thought to be simple polytypes as being due to a twelve-layer hexagonal polytype of MnsSi60 ls(OH)lO (with schallerite having having a very pronounced substructure with A = some essential As) (Frondel and Bauer, 1953). All a/4 and C = c/4. Because of that pseudosymmetry, were thought to be hexagonal with a ~ 13.4 A and indexing of powder diffraction data on the basis of with values of c that are multiples of 7.15 A, the the IMl unit cell parameters gives rise to multiple thickness of a single layer. Manganpyrosmalite, indices for most reflections, such that the para- schallerite, and friedelite were interpreted to have meters of the monoclinic cell cannot be refined by one-, two-, and three-layer structures, respectively, least-squares.
Recommended publications
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • New Mineral Names*
    American Mineralogist, Volume 77, pages II16-1 121, 1992 NEW MINERAL NAMES* JonN L. J,lrvrnon CANMET, 555 Booth Street,Ottawa, Ontario KlA 0G1, Canada Jacrr Pvztnwtcz Institute of Geological Sciences,University of Wroclaw, Cybulskiego30, 50-205 Wroclaw, Poland Camerolaite* wt0/0, corresponding to Na, ,u(ZnoroMnOo,o)ro ro - .4.03HrO, H. Sarp, P. Perroud (1991) (Ti38sNb0 07Fe' 04),3 e6Si8 08Or8 ideally Nau- Camerolaite,CuoAlr- . [HSbO.,SO4](OH),0(CO3). 2HrO, a new mineral from ZnTioSirO,, 4H,O. The mineral contains0.18-0.22 wto/o Cap Garonne mine, Var, France.Neues Jahrb. Mineral. F. Occurs as fan-shaped intergrowths of long prismatic Mon.,481-486. crystals,elongate [001], flattened [100], up to 7 mm long and 0.1 mm thick. Transparent, white to colorless,some Electron microprobe (ave. of eight) and CHN analyses grains with a silver tint; vitreous luster, elastic, crushes (for CO, and HrO) gaveCuO 40.56,AlrO3 14.54,SbrO5 into thin fibers along the elongation; uneven, splintery 13.55,SO3 4.75, CO2 6.26,F{2O 20.00, sum 99.66wto/o, fracture, white streak, yellow-green luminescencein the correspondingto Cu.,6,4,1, jeSo Co O,n ide- eesb' ol eeHrs 5, oo, electronmicroprobe beam, hardness 517-571 (ave.544) ally CuoAlr[HSbO4,SO4XOH),0(CO3).2HrO.Occurs as kglmm2 with a 20-g load (Mohs 5.5-6), no cleavage,{010} tufts and radiating aggregates(0.5-2 mm) of transparent, parting. D-"u" : 2.90, D"ut": 2.95 g/cm3 with Z : 2. blue-greenacicular crystalsup to 0.5 mm long and show- Colorlessin transmitted light, nonpleochroic, straight ex- ing {100} and {001}, flattenedon {100}, elongate[010].
    [Show full text]
  • (Mg,Mn2+,Fe2+,Zn)48 Lennilenapeite
    2+ 2+ K6 7(Mg; Mn ; Fe ; Zn)48 ¡ Lennilenapeite (Si; Al)72(O; OH)216 ² 16H2O c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Triclinic. Point Group: n.d. As platy crystals forming dense aggregates, to 1 cm; as drusy coatings. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Perfect on 001 , imperfect on hk0 . Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 3 D(meas.) = 2.72 D(calc.) = nf.d. g f g » Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Dark brown, light green; black in aggregates. Streak: Brown. Luster: Vitreous to resinous. Optical Class: Biaxial ({); pseudouniaxial ({). Pleochroism: Strong; X = light brown to colorless; Y = Z = dark brown. Absorption: Y = Z > X. ® = 1.553(2) ¯ = 1.594(4) ° = 1.594(4) 2V(meas.) = 0± Cell Data: Space Group: n.d. a = 21.9(1) b = n.d. c = n.d. ® = n.d. ¯ = n.d. ° = n.d. Z = 1 X-ray Powder Pattern: Franklin, New Jersey, USA. 12.11 (100), 2.582 (40), 2.734 (30), 2.365 (30), 1.593 (30), 1.578 (30), 4.07 (20) Chemistry: (1) (2) SiO2 44.5 45.11 Al2O3 5.4 4.79 Fe2O3 5.9 7.15 FeO 6.4 7.32 MnO 11.6 6.22 ZnO 6.3 4.92 MgO 7.0 11.39 CaO trace 0.59 BaO 1.3 0.91 K2O 3.0 2.76 Na2O 0.2 0.38 H2O 8.4 [8.46] Total 100.0 [100.00] 2+ 3+ (1) Franklin, New Jersey, USA; by electron microprobe, Fe :Fe and H2O separately determined, total recalculated to 100.0% from 102.2%; corresponds to 2+ 3+ 3+ (K5:36Ba0:71Na0:54)§=6:61(Mg14:63Mn13:78Fe7:50Zn6:52Fe5:57)§=48:00(Si62:42Al8:93Fe0:65)§=72:00 [O171:29(OH)44:71]§=216:00 ² 16:94H2O: (2) Do.; H2O by di®erence, corresponds to (K4:79Na1:01 2+ 3+ 3+ Ca0:86Ba0:48)§=7:14(Mg23:12Fe8:33Mn7:17Zn4:95Fe4:43)§=48:00(Si61:42Al7:69Fe2:89)§=72:00 [O170:33(OH)45:67]§=216:00 ² 15:57H2O: Polymorphism & Series: Forms a series with franklinphilite.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,480,729 B2 Atanasoska Et Al
    US008480729B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,480,729 B2 Atanasoska et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 9, 2013 (54) MEDICAL DEVICES CONTAINING SILICATE 2003/0093107 A1 5/2003 Parsonage et al. AND CARBON PARTICLES 2003. O133865 A1 7/2003 Smalley et al. 2003/0143350 A1* 7/2003 Jimenez ....................... 428,352 2003/0171257 A1 9, 2003 Stirblet al. (75) Inventors: Liliana Atanasoska, Edina, MN (US); 2003. O180472 A1 9, 2003 Zhou et al. Jan Weber, Maastrichet (NL); John 2003/0185985 A1 10, 2003 Bronikowski et al. Jianhua Chen, Plymouth, MN (US); 2003/0236514 A1 12/2003 Schwarz 2004/003.8007 A1 2/2004 Kotov et al. Daniel J. Horn, Shoreview, MN (US) 2004/OO73251 A1 4/2004 Weber 2004/O136896 A1 7/2004 Liu et al. (73) Assignee: Boston Science Scimed, Inc., Maple 2004/0266063 Al 12/2004 Montgomery et al. Grove, MN (US) 2005, OO38498 A1 2/2005 Dubrow et al. 2005, 0124976 A1* 6/2005 Devens et al. ................ 604,523 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 2005, 0140261 A1 6, 2005 Gilad patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2005/0152891 A1* 7/2005 Toone et al. .................. 424,125 2005, 0181015 A1 8/2005 Zhong U.S.C. 154(b) by 954 days. 2005/0208100 A1 9, 2005 Weber et al. 2005/0260355 A1 11/2005 Weber et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/205,647 2006/0051535 A1 3/2006 Arney et al. 2007/O154513 A1 7/2007 Atanasoska et al. (22) Filed: Sep. 5, 2008 2007/02O7182 A1 9, 2007 Weber 2009/0104386 A1* 4/2009 Barrera et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0093986 A1 Bramoulle Et Al
    US 2012O093986A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0093986 A1 Bramoulle et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 19, 2012 (54) METHOD FOR PRODUCING HIGHLY (30) Foreign Application Priority Data PALATABLE DRY CAT FOOD Jun. 19, 2009 (EP) .................................. O9305580.4 (76) Inventors: Loic Bramoulle, Sarzeau (FR): Publication Classification Isabelle Guiller, Le Tour Du Parc (51) Int. Cl. (FR); Julien Ruaud. Pleucadeuc A23K L/18 (2006.01) (FR) A23P I/08 (2006.01) A23PI/2 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 13/378,856 (52) U.S. Cl. ......... 426/302: 426/442: 426/656: 426/531; 426/650 (57) ABSTRACT (22) PCT Filed: Jun. 15, 2010 The present invention relates to a method for producing highly palatable dry cat foods, by providing dry cat food (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2010/0584.05 preparations having specific compositions and/or texture properties, and by adding thereto palatability enhancers, so as S371 (c)(1), to obtain highly palatable dry cat foods. Preferably, the (2), (4) Date: Dec. 16, 2011 present invention provides highly palatable dry cat foods having a rigidity below or equal to about 100 N/mm. Also is Related U.S. Application Data the present invention related to a method for increasing the palatability effect of a liquid palatability enhancer for use in (60) Provisional application No. 61/218,765, filed on Jun. dry cat food preparation, and to kits useful for enhancing 19, 2009. palatability of dry cat foods. Patent Application Publication Apr. 19, 2012 Sheet 1 of 4 US 2012/0093986 A1 A) FIGURE 1 Patent Application Publication Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • 31St Annual Franklin-Sterling Mineral Exhibit
    granklin-Sterling al The Fluorescent Mineral Capitol of the World p Sat. & Sun., Oct. 3rd & 4th, 1987 c3,- .. ._ Sponsored by KIWANIS CLUB OF FRANKLIN FRANKLIN, NEW JERSEY MINERAL FREE, EDUCATIONAL, NON-PROFIT MINERAL MUSEUM O IN MEMORIUM LEE. S. ARESON w 1916 - 1987 Collector - Student - Missionary of Franklin N.J. History & Minerals C Honorary Member FOMS A Member North Jersey Min. Soc. S JENNIE ARESON E TEL. (914) 343-5051 21 IRWIN AVENUE MIDDLETOWN, NEW YORK 10940 eemohe tones mmmor, !POPP.) AMOIMOPOPOPPPOnOPOPOPPg,Mg ssos s ossossosossossosssss sssossoostssosesssossssssss The FRANKLIN - STERLING HILL MINERALS Edited from various sources by John L. Baum, Curator of the Franklin Mineral Museum, August, 1987, following the nomenclature of the 1983 Glossary of Mineral Species, and with special thanks to Dr. Pete J. Dunn. Acanthite Cahnite Fayalite Acmite Calcite Feitknechtite Actinolite Canavesite Ferrimolybdite Adamite Carrollite Ferristilpnomelane Adelite Caryopilite Ferroaxinite Akrochordite Celestine Flinkite Albite Celsian Fluoborite Allactite Cerussite Fluorapatite Allanite Chabazite Fluorapophyllite Alleghanyite Chalcocite Fluorite Almandine Chalcophanite Forsterite Analcime Chalcopyrite Franklinite Anatase Chamosite Friedelite Andradite Charlesite Anglesite Chlorophoenicite Gageite Anhydrite Chondrodite Gahnite Annabergite Chrysocolla Galena Anorthite Chrysotile Ganomalite Anorthoclase Clinochlore Ganophyllite Anthophyllite* Clinochry3otile Genthelvite Antigorite Clinoclase Gersdorffite Aragonite Clinohedrite Gerstmannite Arsenic
    [Show full text]
  • Brattforsite, Mn19(Aso3)12Cl2, a New Arsenite Mineral Related to Magnussonite, from Brattforsgruvan, Nordmark, Värmland, Sweden
    Mineralogy and Petrology (2021) 115:595–609 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-021-00749-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Brattforsite, Mn19(AsO3)12Cl2, a new arsenite mineral related to magnussonite, from Brattforsgruvan, Nordmark, Värmland, Sweden Dan Holtstam1 & Cristian Biagioni2 & Ulf Hålenius1 Received: 21 December 2020 /Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published online: 26 May 2021 # The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 Abstract Brattforsite is an approved mineral (IMA2019-127), with ideal formula Mn19(AsO3)12Cl2. Associated minerals in the type specimen from the Brattfors mine, Nordmark (Värmland, Sweden) include jacobsite, alleghanyite, phlogopite, calcite and dolomite. Brattforsite, forming subhedral, mostly equant crystals up to 0.5 mm across, is orange to reddish-brown with a white streak, and translucent with a resinous to vitreous lustre. The fracture is uneven to subconchoidal, and no cleavage is observed. It is very weakly pleochroic in yellow, optically biaxial (–)with2V = 44(5)° and has calculated mean refractive index of 1.981. Measured and calculated density values are 4.49(1) and 4.54(1) g·cm− 3, respectively. Chemical analyses yields (in wt%): MgO 0.62, CaO 1.26, MnO 48.66, FeO 0.13, As2O3 46.72, Cl 2.61, H2Ocalc 0.07, O ≡ Cl –0.59, sum 99.49, corresponding to the empirical formula (Mn17.67Ca0.58Mg0.40Fe0.05)∑18.70As12.17O35.90Cl1.90(OH)0.20, based on 38 (O + Cl + OH) atoms per formula unit. The five strongest Bragg peaks in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern are [d (Å), I (%), (hkl)]: 2.843,100, (4 44); 2.828, 99, (444); 1.731, 32, (880); 2.448, 28, (800); 1.739, 25, (088).
    [Show full text]
  • IMA–CNMNC Approved Mineral Symbols
    Mineralogical Magazine (2021), 85, 291–320 doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43 Article IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols Laurence N. Warr* Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany Abstract Several text symbol lists for common rock-forming minerals have been published over the last 40 years, but no internationally agreed standard has yet been established. This contribution presents the first International Mineralogical Association (IMA) Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) approved collection of 5744 mineral name abbreviations by combining four methods of nomenclature based on the Kretz symbol approach. The collection incorporates 991 previously defined abbreviations for mineral groups and species and presents a further 4753 new symbols that cover all currently listed IMA minerals. Adopting IMA– CNMNC approved symbols is considered a necessary step in standardising abbreviations by employing a system compatible with that used for symbolising the chemical elements. Keywords: nomenclature, mineral names, symbols, abbreviations, groups, species, elements, IMA, CNMNC (Received 28 November 2020; accepted 14 May 2021; Accepted Manuscript published online: 18 May 2021; Associate Editor: Anthony R Kampf) Introduction used collection proposed by Whitney and Evans (2010). Despite the availability of recommended abbreviations for the commonly Using text symbols for abbreviating the scientific names of the studied mineral species, to date < 18% of mineral names recog- chemical elements
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Index
    ALPHABETICAL INDEX Names of authors are printed in SMALLCAPITALS, subjects in lower-case roman, and localities in italics; book reviews are placed at the end. ACKERMAND, D., see HERD, R. K., 401 BURGESS, W. G., see EDMUNDS, W. M., 407 ADAMS, J. W., see FOORD, E. E., 97 BUSECK, P. R., and CLARK, J., Zaisho meteorite, 229 Aegirine, New South Wales, titanian, in teschenite sill, 529 Calcite, New South Wales, contrasting habits, 519 Aenigmatites, Greenland, 9 CANADA, NOVA SCOTIA, East Kemptville, triplite, 142 Aikinite, Scotland, 88 CANTERFORD, J. H., TSAMBOURAKIS,G., and LAMBERT, B., ALLEN, D., polishing geological specimens, 298 dypingite, 437 Amphibole, nomenclature computerization, 211; Green- Caratiite, Italy, new mineral, 537; crystal structure, 541 land, 8, 329; India, 190; New South Wales, 172; sub- CAWTHORN, R. G., see DAVIES, G., 469 calcic, Fe-rich, in meta-dolerites, 47; Oman, 16 Celadonite, Lake District, 113 ANDERSEN, T. B., zoned garnets from Norway, 21 Chalcophanite, Western Australia, low-Zn content, 556 ANDREWS, J. N., see EDMUNDS, W. M., 407 CHEN, T. T., see PAAR, W. H., 283 ANTENUCC1, D., see FRANSOLET, A.-M., 373 Chloritoid, Turkey, regional assemblages, 159 Anthoinite, Tasmania, 397 CLARK, A. H., see KONTAK, D. J., 547 Aragonite-calcite associations, New South Wales, 519 CLARK, A. M., FEJER, E. E., and COUVER, A. G., caratiite, ASHWORTH, J. R., and EVIRGEN, M. M., chloritoid assem- new mineral, 537; -- -- and JONES, G. C., sweetite, blages in Turkey, 159 new mineral, 267 Augite, 485 CLARK, D. R., see WILSON, M. J., 127 AUSTRALIA,lithiophorite, 383; YEW SOUTHWALES, Broken CLARK, J., see BUSECK, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Gabrielgonzalomachadocorr19.Pdf
    GABRIEL GONZALO MACHADO . CORRELATIONS BETWEEN GEOLOGICAL TRACK AND BENTONITE QUALITY IN THE MERCOSUR TRADE BLOCK São Paulo 2019 GABRIEL GONZALO MACHADO CORRELATIONS BETWEEN GEOLOGICAL TRACK AND BENTONITE QUALITY IN THE MERCOSUR TRADE BLOCK A thesis presented to the post graduation program of the mineral engineering & of the Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo as a requirement for the degree of Doctor of Science São Paulo 2019 GABRIEL GONZALO MACHADO CORRELATIONS BETWEEN GEOLOGICAL TRACK AND BENTONITE QUALITY IN THE MERCOSUR TRADE BLOCK A thesis presented to the post graduation program of the mineral engineering & of the Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo as a requirement for the degree of Doctor of Science Advisor: Prof. Dr. Henrique Kahn Co-advisor: Prof. Dr. Francisco Valenzuela Diaz São Paulo 2019 Dedicated to my pillar during these tough four years; with love to you Josefina. ACKOWLEDGEMENTS In early 2015, the author of this thesis arrived to Sao Paulo as a foreigner embracing this challenging research project, without the support and guidance of everyone listed below, it would have been impossible to successfully achieve this enterprise, to all of them, I own eternal gratitude. My advisor Prof. Henrique Kahn opened the door to the LCT and with it, came a wonderful team of researchers to aid me, for that I thank Juliana, Daniel, Renato, Carina, Manuela, Saulo, Guilherme, Fabrizzio, Paulo, Ilda, Ingled, Lino, Juscelino, Erilio, Adhemar, Fernanda, Thais, Gislayne, Mavinier. In the mining engineering department, I thank Eliana, Prof. Laurindo, Prof. Arthur, Prof. Homero, Fernanda, Alfredo, Juninho, Josi, Wellington, Jatoba, Andre Baradel and Yinka.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulae of Selected Arsenic Minerals Are Listed in Chapter 2, APPENDIX 1 (P
    INDEX Arsenic minerals (in which As is essential to the crystal structure) Formulae of selected arsenic minerals are listed in Chapter 2, APPENDIX 1 (p. 174-183). abernathyite 145 274, 280-282, 295, 297, 301, adamite 23, 31, 39, 44, 115, 116, 118, 240, 304, 317, 350, 355-357, 359, 243, 311, 474, 476, 594, 610-615, 361, 366, 436, 473-475, 477, 620, 624, 627 483, 486, 490-492, 494-497, adelite 23, 111, 112, 476, 477, 519 537, 539, 542, 544, 546, 549, aerugite 130 554, 559, 561-564, 567, 571, agardite 75, 111, 624 574-578, 581, 624 akrochordite 23, 88, 95, 96 arsenovanmeersscheite 145 alarsite 26, 84, 85, 90 arsentsumebite 95, 610-613, 624 algodonite 23 arsenuranospathite 145 alacranite 28, 29 arsenuranylite 145 allactite 23, 24, 104, 124 arthurite 120, 121, 144, 474, 476 alumopharmacosiderite 39, 43, 75, 109 asbecasite 24, 133, 139 andyrobertsite 100, 101, 624 asselbornite 145 angelellite 26, 33, 36, 118, 312, 348, 364 atelestite 128 annabergite 23, 26, 48, 51, 57, 69, attikaite 75, 144 73-76, 96, 274, 476, 627 auriacusite 118 arakiite 143, 144 austinite 23, 112, 244, 474, 476, 594, ardennite 25 612, 613, 620, 624, 627 arhbarite 107 barahonaite-(Al) 75, 144, 146 armangite 23, 131, 138, 141, 142 barahonaite-(Fe) 146 arsenbrackebuschite 95, 624 barian tomichite 140 arsendescloizite 112, 476, 624 bariopharmacosiderite 23, 33, 34, 109 arsenic, native or elemental 3, 4, 218, baumhauerite 23 248, 266, 272, 274, bayldonite 65, 67, 74, 75, 97, 244, 476, 357, 475, 476, 612 594, 602, 603, 610-613, arseniopleite 23, 122 617-619, 621, 624, 627 arseniosiderite
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Chemistry, Petrogenesis And
    695 The CanadinnM ineralo gi st Vol. 31,pp. 695-710(1993) PYROSMALITEIN CANADIANPRECAMBRIAN SULFIDE DEPOSITS: MINERALCHEMISTRY, PETROGENESIS AND SIGNIFICANCE YLIANMING PAN, MICHAEL E. FLEET, ROBERT L. BARNER E-llPYUAN CIIEN Depanmentof Geology,University of WesternOntario, Lnilon, OntarioN6A 587 ABSTRACT Pyrosmalite-seriesminerals [(Fe,Mn)sSi6Or5(OH,Cl)10]are reportedfrom metamorphosedsulfide depositsin three Canidian Precambrianmining camps: Matagami, Quebec (Archean, Zn-Cu-Ag-Au), Manitouwadge, Ontario (Archean' Cu-Zn-Ag-Au) and ThompsonNickel Belt, Manitoba (hoterozoic, Ni-Au-PGE). As a result of electron-nricroprobedata, pyrosmaliteis found to form a continuoussolid-solution series from a value of Mn/(Fe + Mn) of 0.08 to 0.85, and is n sink for bi. texturat characteristicsand elementpartitioning indicatetlat pyrosmalitecrystallized during both regional metamorphism and late-stagehyttrothermal activity. However, the initial Cl-emichment in the host lithologies may have occurred during seafloorhy&othermal alterationas an integral part of the syngeneticore-forming processes for the associatedbase-metal nin- eralization.Identification of pyrosmalitein volcanogenicmassive sulfide flfMS) depositsprovides further supaortfor a brine- pool model for ore genesisind suggeststhat the precious-metalmineralization commonly associatedwith these sulfide depositsmay havebeen related to Cl-rich fluids. Keywords:pyrosmalite-series minerals, (Fe,I\4n) solid solution, Cl-enrichment,Canadian hecambrian suLfrdedeposits, brine- pool model,precious-metal
    [Show full text]