State Library of South Australia Jd Somerville Oral History Collection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Library of South Australia Jd Somerville Oral History Collection STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 582 Full transcript of SIR MARK OLIPHANT CEREMONY on 18 August 2000 at Bonython Hall Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library OH 582 SIR MARK OLIPHANT CEREMONY NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was donated to the State Library. It was not created by the J.D. Somerville Oral History Collection and does not necessarily conform to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. This transcript had not been proofread prior to donation to the State Library and has not yet been proofread since. Researchers are cautioned not to accept the spelling of proper names and unusual words and can expect to find typographical errors as well. 2 J.D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION, MORTLOCK LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIANA: INTERVIEW NO. OH 582 ABC radio recording of Sir Mark Oliphant Memorial Ceremony held at Bonython Hall, The University of Adelaide, on 18th August 2000. TAPE 1 SIDE A ANNOUNCER – You’re with 891 ABC Adelaide, and now we cross to Neil Wiese at The University of Adelaide for the Memorial Ceremony for Sir Mark Oliphant. WIESE – Good morning, and welcome to Bonython Hall where today many eminent South Australians are gathered to pay tribute to Sir Mark Oliphant. It is appropriate that the ceremony is being held here, at The University of Adelaide, where in 1919 Sir Mark began studying Physics. Now, as an agnostic, Sir Mark did not want a church service, so we’re here today for a memorial ceremony and to hear from those who want to pay tribute to this great South Australian. Members of Sir Mark Oliphant’s family are being seated in the hall, the last to be seated Ms Vivienne Wilson and Dr Keith Powell, Mr Michael and Mrs Peppi Lawson, Mrs Monica Oliphant, Ms Michelle Oliphant, Ms Katherine Oliphant and Mr Tony Reith and their child, Anna. Invited guests have been arriving here at Bonython Hall since just after nine this morning to the strains of Mozart, Vivaldi, Bach and Handel by the Zephyr String Quartet. Today’s memorial ceremony is being led by Dr Harry Medlin, Visiting Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Physics, and Emeritus Senior Deputy Chancellor at The University of Adelaide. Now, amongst some of the guests here today we have four Premiers. We have the current Premier, John Olsen, the immediate past Premier, Dean Brown, and also John Bannon and Dr David Tonkin, a former Premier. And we also have the former Governor of South Australia, Sir Keith Seaman and Lady Seaman, and another former Governor of South Australia, Sir Donald Dunstan and Lady Dunstan. And we also have a number of Members of State Parliament. And the people are gathered here now; the Bonython Hall is full, and the scenes that we’re seeing here are quite moving. Now, after the War, it’s interesting to note that Sir Mark returned to the University of Birmingham, where he continued as Professor of Physics and helped build the proton synchrotron. You may recall there in 1950 he was approached by the newly-established Australian National University to become the first Director of the ANU Research School of Physical Sciences. He accepted, and he returned to Australia with his family. Now, establishing the Australian Academy of Science was just one of Sir Mark’s proudest achievements. He realised, upon his return to Australia in 1950, that Australia had no voice, no international voice, in the scientific arena. 3 And now let’s just enjoy some of that music while we await the speakers. (Music continues for several minutes.) Would you please stand for the arrival of the Oliphant family? Amongst this morning’s speakers will be John Olsen, the Premier of South Australia, and the current Governor of South Australia, Sir Eric Neal. JD DR HARRY MEDLIN, Master of Ceremonies Ladies and gentlemen, welcome. The members of the Oliphant family who are here today are Sir Mark’s daughter, Vivienne Wilson, with Keith Powell, her son, Michael, and his wife Peppi, Sir Mark’s daughter-in-law, Monica Oliphant, and her children, Michelle Oliphant, Katherine Oliphant with her husband, Tony Wright, and Sir Mark’s great-grandchild, Hannah. Well, I taught both Monica and her late husband Michael, Sir Mark’s son, here in Adelaide. Sir Mark and I had many contacts over the years, but I mention only two, and both were during centenaries. The first was in 1974, the year of the centenary of this great university, and in the middle of Sir Mark’s term as Governor. He attended many, if not all, of the formal occasions that ran from March through to October in that year. The second was in 1986, the centenary of the appointment of Sir William Bragg, later Nobel laureate, together with his son, Sir Laurence Bragg, as the Elder Professor of Mathematics in Experimental Physics, with the appointment dating from the 1st of March 1886. Sir Mark and I attended the centenary lectures in this great hall by Professors Frank Close, Freeman Dyson and Paul Davies, and by Stephen Bragg, grandson of Sir William. Well, having graduated as he did, in 1923, with first class honours in Physics, and having worked as a demonstrator with Professor Sir Kerr Grant in 1926 and 1927, Sir Mark was our oldest living graduate and our oldest living former staff member. Ladies and gentlemen, I welcome all of the distinguished guests, together with all friends and colleagues here and elsewhere today. The order of today’s ceremony is as shown in the program. The first tribute today is to be given by the Honourable John Olsen, Premier of South Australia. Mr Olsen. THE HONOURABLE JOHN OLSEN, Premier of South Australia The Oliphant family and descendants, His Excellency, Sir Eric Neal, Lady Neal, Leader of the 4 Opposition, Ministers, ladies and gentlemen. Born in the year of Federation, Marcus Laurence Elwin Oliphant was, like his nation, within sight of the Centenary when he passed away last month. He lived through an extraordinary century, the likes of which the world had never seen before, and few people could have appreciated the fact as fully as Sir Mark Oliphant himself. He was a man who embraced progress and placed himself at the vanguard of change. And what changes he saw! He lived through the century that took us from dreams of flight to the moon, from the box brownie to the digital handicam, from the Overland Telegraph to the World Wide Web, and from trench warfare to the nuclear madness of mutually assured destruction. Sir Mark Oliphant regretted some applications of science, particularly his role in developing the atom bomb, but that was what made this brilliant scientist even more laudable. He embraced change, but warned of its consequences. He encouraged progress, but realised the need for conservation. He loved science, but he never valued it above humanity. Growing up in Adelaide in the Adelaide Hills, Mark Oliphant had the benefit of a strong family life. Mark and his brothers attended public school. His father was a dedicated public servant, and his mother worked hard to maintain a good home life. He studied hard because he wanted to learn, and what a lesson he then leaves for the rest of us an honest toiler from a school in the Adelaide Hills, who worked hard and made the most of his talents forging a career at the forefront of world scientific endeavours. As a youth, Mark Oliphant endured the frustration and disappointment applying for jobs and missing out. He worked hard at jobs he didn’t enjoy, but he kept at it and he kept his sights high. This was a man who had the self-confidence to believe he could be a nuclear physicist, yet he had the humility to spend his days stacking books onto library shelves so he could pay his way through university. At this very university, the young Oliphant’s enthusiasm for learning grew. He allowed himself to be inspired by people around him. His biographers cite a debate the young Mark Oliphant witnessed involving the great geologist and Antarctic explorer, Sir Douglas Mawson. And what a momentous night that seems now Mawson and Oliphant in the same room here at the university, discussing, no doubt, the great theories of the 5 day. Of course, at that time Mawson was a hero, Oliphant unknown, but now together they stand as scientific heroes of Adelaide, Australia, the world. In his early twenties, Oliphant left Adelaide with his young wife, Rose, to take up a scholarship at Cambridge, joining the world’s leading laboratory in experimental physics. And even today, in the post-nuclear age, many of us are mystified by the term ‘nuclear physics’. It seems so difficult to some of us, so abstract, so incomprehensible. It certainly holds a beauty that attracted, however, Mark Oliphant. He and his colleagues were investigating the very building blocks of matter. Their immensely challenging quest was aimed simply at discovering how the substance of the universe was structured.
Recommended publications
  • Media Release
    MEDIA RELEASE 7 February 2017 Premier awards Tennyson Medal at SACE Merit Ceremony The Premier of South Australia, the Hon. Jay Weatherill MP, awarded the prestigious Tennyson Medal for excellence in English Studies to 2016 Year 12 graduate, Ashleigh Jones at the SACE Merit Ceremony at Government House today. The ceremony, in its twenty-ninth year, saw 996 students awarded with 1302 subject merits for outstanding achievement in SACE Stage 2 subjects. Subject merits are awarded to students who gain an overall subject grade of A+ and demonstrate exceptional achievement in that subject. As part of the Merit Ceremony, His Excellency the Hon. Hieu Van Le AC, the Governor of South Australia, presented the following awards: Governor of South Australia Commendation for outstanding overall achievement in the SACE (twenty-five recipients in 2016) Governor of South Australia Commendation — Aboriginal Student SACE Award for the Aboriginal student with the highest overall achievement in the SACE Governor of South Australia Commendation – Excellence in Modified SACE Award for the student with an identified intellectual disability who demonstrates outstanding achievement exclusively through SACE modified subjects. The Tennyson Medal dates back to 1901 when the former Governor of South Australia, Lord Tennyson, established the Tennyson Medal to encourage the study of English literature. The long list of recipients includes the late John Bannon AO, 39th Premier of South Australia, who was awarded the medal in 1961. For her Year 12 English Studies, Ashleigh studied works by Henrik Ibsen (A Doll’s House), Zhang Yimou who directed Raise the Red Lantern, and Tennessee Williams (The Glass Menagerie).
    [Show full text]
  • Rutherford's Nuclear World: the Story of the Discovery of the Nuc
    Rutherford's Nuclear World: The Story of the Discovery of the Nuc... http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/rutherford/sections/atop-physic... HOME SECTIONS CREDITS EXHIBIT HALL ABOUT US rutherford's explore the atom learn more more history of learn about aip's nuclear world with rutherford about this site physics exhibits history programs Atop the Physics Wave ShareShareShareShareShareMore 9 RUTHERFORD BACK IN CAMBRIDGE, 1919–1937 Sections ← Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next → In 1962, John Cockcroft (1897–1967) reflected back on the “Miraculous Year” ( Annus mirabilis ) of 1932 in the Cavendish Laboratory: “One month it was the neutron, another month the transmutation of the light elements; in another the creation of radiation of matter in the form of pairs of positive and negative electrons was made visible to us by Professor Blackett's cloud chamber, with its tracks curled some to the left and some to the right by powerful magnetic fields.” Rutherford reigned over the Cavendish Lab from 1919 until his death in 1937. The Cavendish Lab in the 1920s and 30s is often cited as the beginning of modern “big science.” Dozens of researchers worked in teams on interrelated problems. Yet much of the work there used simple, inexpensive devices — the sort of thing Rutherford is famous for. And the lab had many competitors: in Paris, Berlin, and even in the U.S. Rutherford became Cavendish Professor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory in 1919, following the It is tempting to simplify a complicated story. Rutherford directed the Cavendish Lab footsteps of J.J. Thomson. Rutherford died in 1937, having led a first wave of discovery of the atom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia
    Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia Clare Parker BMusSt, BA(Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Discipline of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Adelaide. August 2013 ii Contents Contents ii Abstract iv Declaration vi Acknowledgements vii List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures x A Note on Terms xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: ‘The Practice of Sound Morality’ 21 Policing Abortion and Homosexuality 24 Public Conversation 36 The Wowser State 44 Chapter 2: A Path to Abortion Law Reform 56 The 1930s: Doctors, Court Cases and Activism 57 World War II 65 The Effects of Thalidomide 70 Reform in Britain: A Seven Month Catalyst for South Australia 79 Chapter 3: The Abortion Debates 87 The Medical Profession 90 The Churches 94 Activism 102 Public Opinion and the Media 112 The Parliamentary Debates 118 Voting Patterns 129 iii Chapter 4: A Path to Homosexual Law Reform 139 Professional Publications and Prohibited Literature 140 Homosexual Visibility in Australia 150 The Death of Dr Duncan 160 Chapter 5: The Homosexuality Debates 166 Activism 167 The Churches and the Medical Profession 179 The Media and Public Opinion 185 The Parliamentary Debates 190 1973 to 1975 206 Conclusion 211 Moral Law Reform and the Public Interest 211 Progressive Reform in South Australia 220 The Slippery Slope 230 Bibliography 232 iv Abstract This thesis examines the circumstances that permitted South Australia’s pioneering legalisation of abortion and male homosexual acts in 1969 and 1972. It asks how and why, at that time in South Australian history, the state’s parliament was willing and able to relax controls over behaviours that were traditionally considered immoral.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette
    No. 80 3145 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 24 JUNE 1999 CONTENTS Page Page Accident Towing Roster Scheme Regulations 1984— Public Sector Management Act 1995—Notices..................................................................3215 Notice...............................................................................................................................3159 Real Property Act 1886—Notice.........................................................................................3217 Acts Assented To...................................................................................................................3146 REGULATIONS Appointments, Resignations, Etc...........................................................................................3156 Evidence Act 1929—(No. 120 of 1999).........................................................................3272 Corporations and District Councils—Notices.......................................................................3285 Explosives Act 1936—(No. 121 of 1999).......................................................................3273 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notices.........................................................................................3157 Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988— Dairy Industry Act 1992—Notice........................................................................................3183 (No. 122 of 1999)..........................................................................................................3274
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of ASSEMBLY Page 2215 HOUSE of ASSEMBLY Thursday 25 November 2010 the SPEAKER (Hon
    Confidential and Subject to Revision Thursday 25 November 2010 HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Page 2215 HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Thursday 25 November 2010 The SPEAKER (Hon. L.R. Breuer) took the chair at 11:01 and read prayers. UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE (TRUST PROPERTY) AMENDMENT BILL Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (10:32): Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the University of Adelaide Act 1971. Read a first time. Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (10:33): I move: That this bill be now read a second time. I move the University of Adelaide (Trust Property) Amendment Bill with a heavy heart. However, it is supported by the Liberal opposition and I am pleased to have its support. It is a bill to amend the University of Adelaide Act 1971. Members will be aware that the University of Adelaide was established by an act of this parliament, the first in South Australia and the third in Australia. It has a proud and respected history as an institution in this state. In 2003, the structure and independence of the governance of our universities was debated as a result of introduced bills for our three public universities in South Australia by then minister Lomax-Smith and supported by the opposition. An essential element of that bill was to provide greater autonomy in the handling of the university's own affairs, including its financial affairs and, in particular, the capacity to be able to buy, sell, lease, encumber or deal with its assets, and particularly real property. However, the reform retained in it an obligation to secure cabinet approval for very substantial property it owned, including the North Terrace precinct, Roseworthy and Waite campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice Chancellor and Chancellor's Re
    Vice Chancellor and Chancellor’s dedication of the Bradley Building Time: 10:00am - 12:00 noon Date: Monday 29 March 2021 Place: MOD. Lecture Gallery Vice Chancellor and Chancellor’s re-dedication of the Bradley building CHANCELLOR OPENS PROCEEDINGS • Your Excellency the Honourable Hieu Van Le AC Governor of South Australia; • Mr Matt Cowdrey OAM Member of Parliament, representing the State Minister for Education, Mr John Gardner MP; • Dr Susan Close Member of Parliament; • Emeritus Professor Bruce King and his daughter, Laura; • Denise’s sons James, David and Patrick; 1 | Page Vice Chancellor and Chancellor’s re-dedication of the Bradley building • The Hon Sir Eric Neal AC CVO DUniv – it’s always good to see you at a UniSA event Sir Eric; • And while I had hoped to welcome one of my predecessors and Denise Bradley‘s Chancellor, Professor David Klingberg, we are instead joined by his delightful wife Maggie, and it’s good to see you too Maggie. • Good morning and welcome to all of you, our distinguished guests, donors, supporters and partners of the University; • I am enormously proud to welcome you all to this important event, one that has been a long time in the planning, but one that has been impacted by many of the inconveniences that COVID-19 has brought us. 2 | Page Vice Chancellor and Chancellor’s re-dedication of the Bradley building • Not least of which were the border closures that prevented Denise Bradley’s loved ones being here earlier. • And it’s important that they are here, along with all of you, because this building, the largest ever capital project in UniSA’s history, • is being re-dedicated to honour one of this nation’s greatest educators, and one of our greatest educational leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Great White Noise
    GREAT WHITE NOISE Mark Davis For my fourteenth birthday my parents gav e me a small paperback by someone called Hugh Stretton. I’d never heard of Hugh Stretton and the book looked very enigmatic and not very exciting. It was called Ideas for Australian Cities. I opened it to find, amid the text, some maps and alternative plans for parts of Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney and Adelaide. Now this was more exciting. At fourteen I was very inter- ested in the ways towns were set out, and I spent my spare time drawing alternative plans for all the towns we had ever lived in on large sheets of paper my parents smuggled home from the art department at the school where they worked. When I stopped looking at the pictures and began to read, I became even more excited. It hit me that Hugh Stretton wasn’t just an isolated indi- vidual who happened to be interested in Australian cities, but 183 © Mark Davis. Deposited to the University of Melbourne ePrints Repository with permission of Melbourne University Publishing.Unauthorised reproduced prohibited. was one of a group of people who thought and wrote about such things. I knew this because in the book he entered into debates and discussed other people’s ideas as well as his own. What’s more, they seemed to do it for a living. As a lower- middle-class kid who grew up in country towns, I figured that there were people who planned towns and designed bridges and made laws and thought up ideas, but I’d never met any of them.We knew no academics, lawyers, planners or engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • North Terrace Campus
    A F GRID Physics, Discipline of H7 Physics, G Aboriginal Programs (Wirltu Yarlu) H4 Schulz, L1 Facility Bookings Ph 8313 5151 F7 Union House, L4 Physiology, Discipline of E17 Medical School South, L4 Aboriginal Studies in Music (CASM) H4 Schulz, L6 Financial Services S2 Rundle Mall Plaza, L3 Planning & Performance Reporting S2 Rundle Mall Plaza, L3 Accommodation Service F7 Union House, L4 Forensic Odontology Unit J6 Oliphant, L4 Policy & Appeals, Student L10 Kenneth Wills, L5 Accounts Payable Section S2 Rundle Mall Plaza, L3 French Studies, Department of L14 Napier, L8 Politics & International Studies, Dept. of L14 Napier, G Acute Care Medicine, Discipline of RAH Eleanor Harrald, L5 Population Health, School of R1 178 North Terrace, L11 G Adelaidean Q16 Freemason’s Hall, L2 Post Office K11 Hub Central, L4 Adelaide Graduate Centre W8 115 Grenfell St, L6 Gender Studies & Social Analysis, Prayer Room (Muslim) F7 Union house, L6 Adelaide Health Simulation & Skills Ctre. D17 Medical School North, B Department of L14 Napier, L1 Q11 231 North Tce, G Adelaide Microscopy D17 Medical School North, B General Practice, Discipline of R1 178 North Tce, L11 Professions (Faculty Office) R14 Nexus10 Tower, L11 Adelaide Research & Innovation (ARI) W8 115 Grenfell St, L14 Geography, Environment & Population, Professions First Year Learning Ctre. R14 Nexus10 Tower, G All enquiries visit Adelaide Unicare Pty Ltd R1 178 North Tce, L11 Department of L14 Napier, G Professions Student Hub Q14 Marjoribanks Wing, G&L1 Ask Adelaide Adelaide University Union F7 Union
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution Or Black Hole?
    Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Author Tiernan, Anne-Maree Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Department of Politics and Public Policy DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3587 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367746 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Ministerial Staff under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Anne-Maree Tiernan BA (Australian National University) BComm (Hons) (Griffith University) Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2004 Abstract This thesis traces the development of the ministerial staffing system in Australian Commonwealth government from 1972 to the present. It explores four aspects of its contemporary operations that are potentially problematic. These are: the accountability of ministerial staff, their conduct and behaviour, the adequacy of current arrangements for managing and controlling the staff, and their fit within a Westminster-style political system. In the thirty years since its formal introduction by the Whitlam government, the ministerial staffing system has evolved to become a powerful new political institution within the Australian core executive. Its growing importance is reflected in the significant growth in ministerial staff numbers, in their increasing seniority and status, and in the progressive expansion of their role and influence. There is now broad acceptance that ministerial staff play necessary and legitimate roles, assisting overloaded ministers to cope with the unrelenting demands of their jobs. However, recent controversies involving ministerial staff indicate that concerns persist about their accountability, about their role and conduct, and about their impact on the system of advice and support to ministers and prime ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018
    AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Parliament in the Periphery: Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018* Mark Dean Research Associate, Australian Industrial Transformation Institute, Flinders University of South Australia * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract This article examines the sixteen years of Labor government in South Australia from 2002 to 2018. With reference to industry policy and strategy in the context of deindustrialisation, it analyses the impact and implications of policy choices made under Premiers Mike Rann and Jay Weatherill in attempts to progress South Australia beyond its growing status as a ‘rustbelt state’. Previous research has shown how, despite half of Labor’s term in office as a minority government and Rann’s apparent disregard for the Parliament, the executive’s ‘third way’ brand of policymaking was a powerful force in shaping the State’s development. This article approaches this contention from a new perspective to suggest that although this approach produced innovative policy outcomes, these were a vehicle for neo-liberal transformations to the State’s institutions. In strategically avoiding much legislative scrutiny, the Rann and Weatherill governments’ brand of policymaking was arguably unable to produce a coordinated response to South Australia’s deindustrialisation in a State historically shaped by more interventionist government and a clear role for the legislature. In undermining public services and hollowing out policy, the Rann and Wethearill governments reflected the path dependency of responses to earlier neo-liberal reforms, further entrenching neo-liberal responses to social and economic crisis and aiding a smooth transition to Liberal government in 2018. INTRODUCTION For sixteen years, from March 2002 to March 2018, South Australia was governed by the Labor Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel, Suburb, Cosmos
    The View from Above from Below: Novel, Suburb, Cosmos Brigid Rooney HROUGH CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES OF CAMERA AND FLIGHT, THE VIEW FROM ABOVE directs the opening chapter of The Australian Ugliness (1960), Melbourne- T based Robin Boyd’s famous critique of urban and suburban aesthetic forms. By 1960, such aerial vision was nothing new, but the arrival in 1956 of the Boeing jet meant air-travel was about to eclipse the sea voyage, conquering what Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey famously termed ‘the tyranny of distance’, and ushering in the era of mass tourism. This development naturalised and popularised an aesthetics of panorama that also organises the representation of suburbia. Boyd re-stages the aerial view successively. The visitor’s first approach to Australia is from the north. Moving from Darwin to Bourke, the visitor crosses over country ‘burnt brown and patchy, like a tender sunburnt skin, with sections of darker brown and blood red and blisters of lighter ochre’; his camera-eye view takes in the ‘red backland of Australia’ which ‘looks from the air satisfyingly like its own maps’ (Boyd 18). The arrival of Boyd’s hypothetical visitor, as noted, is staged twice, in the second instance tracking the plane’s approach ‘from across the Pacific’ over 1950s pre- Opera-House Sydney. From the long high view, urban Australia presents a vision of ‘continuity, unity and the promise of comfort in the mushroom roofs and the bright background of tended green’. Momentarily, suburban sprawl figures the ‘love of home’, with ‘great speckled carpets spread wide around every © Australian Humanities Review 60 (November 2016).
    [Show full text]