Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 145/Tuesday, July 28, 2020/Notices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 28, 2020 / Notices 45377 liquidate entries containing subject Dated: July 21, 2020. response to a petition submitted by the merchandise exported by the companies Jeffrey I. Kessler, Center for Biological Diversity. After under review that we determine in the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and reviewing the best scientific and final results to be part of the China-wide Compliance. commercial data available, including the Status Review Report, we have entity at the China-wide rate of 236.00 Appendix I percent. Commerce intends to issue determined the species does not warrant assessment instructions to CBP 15 days List of Companies Failing To Demonstrate listing at this time. While the species Eligibility for a Separate Rate after the date of publication of the final has declined in abundance, it still results of this review in the Federal 1. Dandong Xinxing Carbon Co., Ltd. occupies its historical range, and Register.14 2. Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. population trends indicate 3. Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of subpopulations are stable or increasing Cash Deposit Requirements Haicheng City in most locations. We conclude that the 4. Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City dwarf seahorse is not currently in The following cash deposit 5. Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng City 6. Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co., danger of extinction throughout all or a requirements will be effective upon significant portion of its range and is not publication of the final results of this Ltd. 7. Henan Xintuo Refractory Co., Ltd. likely to become so within the review for shipments of subject 8. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories foreseeable future. merchandise from China entered, or 9. Liaoning Zhongmei High Temperature DATES: This finding was made on July withdrawn from warehouse, for Material Co., Ltd. 28, 2020. 10. Liaoning Zhongmei Holding Co., Ltd. consumption on or after the publication ADDRESSES: The dwarf seahorse Status 11. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd. date, as provided by sections Review Report associated with this 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 12. Shenglong Refractories Co., Ltd. 13. Tangshan Strong Refractories Co., Ltd. determination and its references are previously-investigated or reviewed 14. The Economic Trading Group Of available upon request from the Species Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not Haicheng Houying Corp. Ltd. Conservation Branch Chief, Protected listed above that received a separate rate 15. Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals, Co., Resources Division, NMFS Southeast in a prior segment of this proceeding, Ltd. Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue the cash deposit rate will continue to be 16. Yingkou Heping Sanhua Materials Co., South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, Attn: the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for Ltd. Dwarf Seahorse 12-month Finding. The all Chinese exporters of subject Appendix II report and references are also available merchandise that have not been found electronically at: https:// List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/ to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Decision Memorandum deposit rate will be that for the China- prplans/ID411.html. I. Summary FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: wide entity (i.e., 236.00 percent); and (3) II. Background for all non-Chinese exporters of subject III. Scope of the Order Adam Brame, NMFS Southeast Regional merchandise which have not received IV. Discussion of the Methodology Office, (727) 209–5958; or Celeste Stout, their own rate, the cash deposit rate will V. Recommendation NMFS Office of Protected Resources, be the rate applicable to the Chinese [FR Doc. 2020–16328 Filed 7–27–20; 8:45 am] 301–427–8436. exporter that supplied that non-Chinese BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: exporter. These deposit requirements, Background when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE On April 6, 2011, we received a petition from the Center for Biological Notification to Importers National Oceanic and Atmospheric Diversity to list the dwarf seahorse as Administration threatened or endangered under the This notice also serves as a reminder ESA. The petition asserted that (1) the to importers of their responsibility [Docket No. 200716–0193; RTID 0648– present or threatened destruction, under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a XA496] modification, or curtailment of habitat certificate regarding the reimbursement or range; (2) overutilization for of antidumping duties prior to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Notice of 12-Month Finding commercial, recreational, scientific, or liquidation of the relevant entries on a Petition To List the Dwarf educational purposes; (3) inadequacy of during this review period. Failure to Seahorse as Threatened or existing regulatory mechanisms; and (4) comply with this requirement could Endangered Under the Endangered other natural or manmade factors are result in Commerce’s presumption that Species Act affecting its continued existence and reimbursement of antidumping duties contributing to the dwarf seahorse’s occurred and the subsequent assessment AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries imperiled status. The petitioner also of double antidumping duties. Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and requested that critical habitat be Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), designated for this species concurrent Notification to Interested Parties Department of Commerce. with listing under the ESA. We are issuing and publishing these ACTION: Notice of 12-month finding and On May 4, 2012, NMFS published a preliminary results in accordance with availability of status review document. 90-day finding for dwarf seahorse with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, our determination that the petition SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce a 12- presented substantial scientific and and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and month finding and listing determination commercial information indicating that 351.221(b)(4). on a petition to list the dwarf seahorse the petitioned action may be warranted (Hippocampus zosterae) as threatened (77 FR 26478). We also requested 14 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: or endangered under the Endangered scientific and commercial information Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Species Act (ESA). We have completed from the public to inform a status (October 24, 2011). a status review of the dwarf seahorse in review of the species, as required by VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:43 Jul 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM 28JYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 45378 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 145 / Tuesday, July 28, 2020 / Notices section 4(b)(3)(a) of the ESA. we interpret an ‘‘endangered species’’ to and information summarized in the Specifically, we requested information be one that is presently in danger of Status Review Report (NMFS 2020) as pertaining to: (1) Historical and current extinction. A ‘‘threatened species,’’ on well as the results of the ERA. The ERA distribution and abundance of this the other hand, is not currently in analyzed demographic and listing species throughout its range; (2) danger of extinction but is likely to factors that could affect the status of the historical and current population status become so in the foreseeable future. In dwarf seahorse. Demographic factors and trends; (3) life history in marine other words, a key statutory difference considered included abundance, environments; (4) curio, traditional between a threatened and endangered population growth rate and medicine, and aquarium trade or other species is the timing of when a species productivity, spatial structure/ trade data; (5) any current or planned may be in danger of extinction, either connectivity, and diversity. We also activities that may adversely impact the presently (endangered) or in the identified threats under each of the five species; (6) historical and current foreseeable future (threatened). listing factors: (A) Present or threatened seagrass trends and status; (7) ongoing Under section 4(a)(1) of the ESA, we destruction, modification, or or planned efforts to protect and restore must determine whether any species is curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) the species and its seagrass habitats; (8) endangered or threatened due to any of overutilization of the species for management, regulatory, and the following five factors: (A) The commercial, recreational, scientific, or enforcement information; and (9) any present or threatened destruction, educational purposes; (C) disease or biological information on the species. modification, or curtailment of its predation; (D) inadequacy of existing We received information from the habitat or range; (B) overutilization for regulatory mechanisms; and (E) other public in response to the 90-day finding commercial, recreational, scientific, or natural or manmade factors affecting its and incorporated the information into educational purposes; (C) disease or continued existence. For purposes of both the Status Review Report (NMFS predation; (D) the inadequacy of our analysis, the identification of 2020) and this 12-month finding. existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) demographic or listing factors that could other natural or manmade factors impact a species negatively is not Listing Determinations Under the ESA affecting its continued existence. sufficient to compel a finding that ESA We are responsible for determining To determine whether