DOCSLIB.ORG

External Textual Sources Neo Hittite States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
External Textual Sources Neo Hittite States EXTERNAL TEXTUAL SOURCES NEOHITTITE STATES Kenneth A. Kitchen University of Liverpool 1. Timescale Th e narratives of 1–2 Kings include some three main direct mentions of “Hittites” in their narratives, two under Solomon, and one under the Omrides (ca. 970–840 BCE), in somewhat over a century. In diff ering contexts, two of these allusions link Egypt and the Hittites in one con- tinuum each time. In all three cases, the Hittites concerned are those now termed ‘Neo-Hittites’; in North Syria and South-East Anatolia they spoke and wrote in Late Luwian with Luwian hieroglyphs, the so-called ‘Hittite hieroglyphs’, and drew upon the old imperial Hittite cultural tra- dition. Th ese states and inscriptions lasted from ca. 1180/70 BCE down to ca. 650 at latest, most having been eliminated by Assyria by ca. 700. 2. Extent and Nature of Textual Sources From the later 19th century down to the present, ever-increasing num- bers of the so-called Hittite hieroglyphic inscriptions on walls, stelae and statues have been discovered, and as rock inscriptions in these areas. Scattered portable examples have also turned up as far away as Assyria and in Babylon. Th eir Late Luwian language is Indo-European (like cuneiform Hittite and Luwian). Th e pictorial script expresses syl- lables (mainly consonant + vowels a, i, or u), alphabetic a, i, and u, and closed syllables by adding an “r-tick” to consonant + a-signs. Th ere are over 160 logograms or word-signs, to which syllabic (phonetic) signs can be added, to spell out part or all of a word. A massive three-part corpus containing almost all the accessible inscriptions (other than seals, for separate treatment) with introduc- tions, translations and notes, and a volume of plates, has been issued in exemplary fashion by J. D. Hawkins,1 along with the detailed 1 J. D. Hawkins, Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions, I, Parts 1–3 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2000). 366 kenneth a. kitchen publication of the Karatepe texts by Çambel.2 In this corpus we have over 220 inscriptions from 10 main Neo-Hittite kingdoms, besides a shower of minor fragments. Th is is about ten times the amount of early West-Semitic monumental texts (Old Aramaic, Phoenician, Hebrew/ Moabite) currently available, and is an important resource of the fi rst rank for the culture and local history of North Syria and SE Anatolia ca. 1180–680 BCE, and for the whole of Levantine cultures (including biblical) during that epoch.3 3. The Historical and Cultural Backdrop When the central power-base of the great Hittite Empire in central Anatolia ceased to function ca. 1180/70 BCE, and the line of its Great Kings ceased to rule, then the rulers of two of its major dominions set themselves up as more localised Great Kings instead, each with their group of vassal-rulers. Th us, in SE Anatolia, along the Taurus Moun- tains and into Cilicia, the Great Kings of Tarhuntassa (later, Tabal) ruled over a series of vassals, 24 of them by the time of Shalmane- ser III. Far away from Mesopotamia, and within mountain-fastnesses, this ‘mini-empire’ could long remain independent of either Phrygian threats from the north, or Assyrian interference from the south-east, until well into the 1st millennium. Th e Great Kings of Carchemish initially laid claim to dominion over several local neighbours: Melid, Gurgum and Kummuh to the north; briefl y over Masuwari (later Bit- Adini) and Guzan out east of the Euphrates; over the future Ya’diya/ Sam’al westward; and over Unqi/Patina and Hamath southward. How- ever, between about 1000 and 920, these all broke away as independent states, and the rulers of Carchemish changed style to become simply “King of Carchemish” – aft er some 200 years, the ‘Great’ had gone, with the end of this second mini-empire. Th e growing infl ux of (and control by) Arameans was at once also a factor in this change and in turn led to the very brief rise (ca. 1020–990) of a third mini-empire, that of Aram-Zobah (based on Bit-Rehob) under the Hadadezer of David’s 2 H. Çambel, Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions, II (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999). 3 K. A. Kitchen, “Th e Hieroglyphic Inscriptions of the Neo-Hittite States (ca. 1200–700 BC): A Fresh Source of Background to the Hebrew Bible,” in R. P. Gordon and J. C. A. de Moor (eds.), Th e Old Testament in Its World (OTS, 52; Leiden: Brill, 2005)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 09,David's Victories and Officers.Pdf
    II Samuel 8:1-18 Lesson #9, David‟s victories and officers The Israelites were surrounded by powerful enemies who had a special hatred of their nation. David, like the Messiah after him must destroy all of his and his people‟s enemies (Lk 20:43). II Samuel 8 tells us of victorious wars against the Philistines, against Moab, against Zobah, against Syria, against Amalek, and against Edom. All these successful conquests are explained in this way: „The Lord gave victory to David wherever he went (II Samuel 8:6,14).1 8:1-14, These verses outline the expansion of David‟s kingdom under the hand of the Lord (v:6,14). Israel‟s major enemies were all defeated as David‟s kingdom extended N, S, E, and W. See I Chronicles 18:1-13. This conquering before the event of chap. 7 (see 7:1) MacArthur Study Bible II Sam 8:1, Now after this it came about that David [1.] v:1, chief city. According to I Chr 18:1, defeated the Philistines and subdued them; and What was probably the chief city of the David took control of the chief city (Metheg Philistines? Ammah) from the hand of the Philistines. 2 He defeated Moab, and measured them with the [2.] v:2, Find Moab on your map, page #4 line, making them lie down on the ground; and he and write a description of it‟s location measured two lines to put to death and one full line to keep alive. And the Moabites became servants to David, bringing tribute.
    [Show full text]
  • First Capitals of Armenia and Georgia: Armawir and Armazi (Problems of Early Ethnic Associations)
    First Capitals of Armenia and Georgia: Armawir and Armazi (Problems of Early Ethnic Associations) Armen Petrosyan Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Yerevan The foundation legends of the first capitals of Armenia and Georgia – Armawir and Armazi – have several common features. A specific cult of the moon god is attested in both cities in the triadic temples along with the supreme thunder god and the sun god. The names of Armawir and Armazi may be associated with the Anatolian Arma- ‘moon (god).’ The Armenian ethnonym (exonym) Armen may also be derived from the same stem. The sacred character of cultic localities is extremely enduring. The cults were changed, but the localities kept their sacred character for millennia. At the transition to a new religious system the new cults were often simply imposed on the old ones (e.g., the old temple was renamed after a new deity, or the new temple was built on the site or near the ruins of the old one). The new deities inherited the characteristics of the old ones, or, one may say, the old cults were simply renamed, which could have been accompanied by some changes of the cult practices. Evidently, in the new system more or less comparable images were chosen to replace the old ones: similarity of functions, rituals, names, concurrence of days of cult, etc (Petrosyan 2006: 4 f.; Petrosyan 2007a: 175).1 On the other hand, in the course of religious changes, old gods often descend to the lower level of epic heroes. Thus, the heroes of the Armenian ethnogonic legends and the epic “Daredevils of Sasun” are derived from ancient local gods: e.g., Sanasar, who obtains the 1For numerous examples of preservation of pre-Urartian and Urartian holy places in medieval Armenia, see, e.g., Hmayakyan and Sanamyan 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • The Empires of the Bible from the Confusion of Tongues to the Babylonian Captivity
    The Empires of the Bible from the Confusion of Tongues to the Babylonian Captivity Alonzo T. Jones 1904 Copyright © 2015, Ellen G. White Estate, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS iii..................................................................................................................... PREFACE (1897 edition) iv................................................................................................................ INTRODUCTION v.................................................................................................................................. THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE BIBLE vi....................................................................................... THE ORIGINAL AND ULTIMATE GOVERNMENT viii........................................................ THE ORIGIN OF EVIL x.................................................................................................................. THE TWO WAYS xiii........................................................................................................................ ORIGIN OF MONARCHY xv.......................................................................................................... ORIGIN OF THE STATE AND EMPIRE xvii............................................................................ EMPIRE IN UNDISPUTED SWAY xviii..................................................................................... INTRODUCTION xx......................................................................................................................... ECCLESIASTICAL
    [Show full text]
  • From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East
    REVOLUTIONIZING REVOLUTIONIZING Mark Altaweel and Andrea Squitieri and Andrea Mark Altaweel From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East This book investigates the long-term continuity of large-scale states and empires, and its effect on the Near East’s social fabric, including the fundamental changes that occurred to major social institutions. Its geographical coverage spans, from east to west, modern- day Libya and Egypt to Central Asia, and from north to south, Anatolia to southern Arabia, incorporating modern-day Oman and Yemen. Its temporal coverage spans from the late eighth century BCE to the seventh century CE during the rise of Islam and collapse of the Sasanian Empire. The authors argue that the persistence of large states and empires starting in the eighth/ seventh centuries BCE, which continued for many centuries, led to new socio-political structures and institutions emerging in the Near East. The primary processes that enabled this emergence were large-scale and long-distance movements, or population migrations. These patterns of social developments are analysed under different aspects: settlement patterns, urban structure, material culture, trade, governance, language spread and religion, all pointing at population movement as the main catalyst for social change. This book’s argument Mark Altaweel is framed within a larger theoretical framework termed as ‘universalism’, a theory that explains WORLD A many of the social transformations that happened to societies in the Near East, starting from Andrea Squitieri the Neo-Assyrian period and continuing for centuries. Among other infl uences, the effects of these transformations are today manifested in modern languages, concepts of government, universal religions and monetized and globalized economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuove Scoperte Nella Melid Neo-Hittita 
    Acc. Sc. Torino Quaderni, 28 (2017), 105-122, 10 Þ gg. ©,0(5&2/('Î'(//¶$&&$'(0,$ª 1XRYHVFRSHUWHQHOOD0HOLGQHRKLWWLWD 0ൺඋංඈ/ංඏൾඋൺඇං 5LDVVXQWR Dopo quarant’anni di interruzione, la Missione Archeologica della Sapienza Università di Roma ha ripreso lo scavo dell’area nord del- la collina di Arslantepe, antica Melid, presso l’odierna città di Malatya, in Turchia orientale. La lunga interruzione era dovuta alla necessità di concentrare le risorse nello scavo delle fasi più antiche: i complessi mo- numentali del Tardo Calcolitico e Tardo Uruk (IV mill. a.C.) e la sequenza completa dell’Antico Bronzo (III mill. a.C.). Si tratta di un ritorno alle origini dello scavo di Arslantepe «La collina del leone » così denominata dal leone in pietra, parte della porta della cittadella, che emergeva in super Þ cie. Il progetto della nostra ripresa ha dunque un duplice inten- to: dare alla Porta dei Leoni un contesto topogra Þ co e stratigra Þ co che tuttora le manca; e poi scendere ai livelli inferiori, per colmare il lungo periodo intercorso tra la distruzione della Porta Imperiale e la costruzio- ne della Porta dei Leoni. La campagna del 2008 ha raggiunto il primo scopo: ora sappiamo dunque che la Porta dei Leoni fu costruita alla Þ ne del IX secolo e distrutta alla Þ ne dell’VIII (appunto da Sargon II). La campagna del 2009 ha a ৼ rontato il secondo problema, scendendo al di sotto del salone a pilastri, rimuovendone una fase precedente, incon- trando poi insediamenti di squatters istallati sul rudere del grande muro di cinta post-imperiale, bruciato da un colossale incendio.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Aramaic (Beyond Babel a Handbook Of
    ARAMAIC Frederick E. Greenspahn Aramaic is unique among the languages relevant to biblical studies in that, like Hebrew, it is found both within and beyond the canon. Not only are several sections of the “Hebrew” Bible (most notably Daniel and Ezra) written in Aramaic, but so are several important bodies of texts outside of the Bible that are relevant to understanding it. The name “Aramaic” comes from the Bible itself. It reports that the lead- ers of Judah asked an Assyrian general who was besieging the city of Jerusalem toward the end of the eighth century to speak to them in )araÅ mîta rather than Judean (i.e., Hebrew) so that the general population would not understand what was being said (2 Kgs 18:26 = Isa 36:11). The term is also found in Dan 2:4 and Ezra 4:7, where it indicates the shift from Hebrew to Aramaic that takes place in those verses, and in one of the papyri from Ele- phantine.1 Early Greek sources identify the language as “Syrian,”2 except at Dan 2:26, where the Old Greek uses the term “Chaldean.”3 The name is taken from that of the Aramean people, who are first mentioned by that name in the eleventh century B.C.E., when the Assyrian emperor Tiglath-pileser I reports having encountered them during a mili- tary campaign in Syria.4 There they created several small kingdoms that reached as far east as the Persian Gulf; several of these are mentioned in the Bible, including Beth-rehob, Damascus, Geshur, Hamath, Maacah, Tob, and Zobah.
    [Show full text]
  • ON LUWIANS and HITTITES*) Itamar SINGER
    8367_BIOR_05_5-6_01 30-01-2006 09:10 Pagina 412 429 BIBLIOTHECA ORIENTALIS LXII N° 5-6, september-december 2005 430 ON LUWIANS AND HITTITES*) Itamar SINGER (Tel Aviv) “History is written by the victors” is well demonstrated in ancient Anatolia. Most authorities would agree that Luwian was spoken by at least as many people as Hittite, yet books on the Hittites can easily fill up a library, whereas the reviewed monograph is the first to be entirely dedicated to the Luwians (except for dictionaries). Two ponderous cir- cumstances have teamed together to create this dispropor- tional picture, one inherent, the other accidental. For much of their common history the Hittites dominated the Luwian- speaking areas of Anatolia and, as a great power, they left behind extensive archives fitting their stature. The effects of this political disparity are further intensified by the fortu- itousness of discovery. Not a single tablet was found as yet in the vast territories in which Luwian was spoken (as the main language). To be sure, there must be cuneiform tablets buried in the major sites of western Anatolia, since letters sent from there have been found in Hattusa.1) Ironically, even the first Anatolian tablet to be published in the late 19th cen- tury was sent from the Land of Arzawa in the heart of Luwian-speaking Anatolia. But then, this letter, which was discovered in 1887 at Tell el-Amarna in Egypt, was written *)MELCHERT, H. C. (ed.) The Luwians. HdO 1-68. E.J. Brill Publish- ers, Leiden, 2003. (24 cm, XX, 383). ISBN 90 04 13009 8; ISSN 0169- 9423.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for a Method of Cultural Landscape Character Assessment: a Research on the Context, Method and Results for the Cappadocia Landscape, Turkey
    A PROPOSAL FOR A METHOD OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT: A RESEARCH ON THE CONTEXT, METHOD AND RESULTS FOR THE CAPPADOCIA LANDSCAPE, TURKEY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ZEYNEP TUNA YÜNCÜ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN RESTORATION IN ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2015 Approval of the thesis: A PROPOSAL FOR A METHOD OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT: A RESEARCH ON THE CONTEXT, METHOD AND RESULTS FOR THE CAPPADOCIA LANDSCAPE, TURKEY submitted by ZEYNEP TUNA YÜNCÜ in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Restoration, Department of Architecture, Middle East Technical University by, Prof.Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences _________________ Prof.Dr. T. Elvan Altan Head of Department, Architecture _________________ Prof.Dr. Neriman Şahin Güçhan Supervisor, Department of Architecture, METU _________________ Examining Committee Members: Assoc.Prof.Dr. A.Güliz Bilgin Altınöz Department of Architecture, METU _________________ Prof.Dr. Neriman Şahin Güçhan Department of Architecture, METU _________________ Prof.Dr. Ömür Bakırer Department of Architecture, METU _________________ Prof.Dr. İclal Dinçer Dept. of City and Regional Planning, Yıldız Teknik Uni. ________________ Prof.Dr. Vedat Toprak Dept.of Geological Engineering, METU _________________ Date: 11.09.2015 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Anadolunun Tarihi Coğrafyasi
    ANADOLUNUN TARİHİ COĞRAFYASI KÜLTÜREL MİRAS VE TURİZM AÇIK ÖĞRETİM PROGRAMI DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ METİN ALPARSLAN İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ AÇIK VE UZAKTAN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ KÜLTÜREL MİRAS VE TURİZM AÇIK ÖĞRETİM PROGRAMI ANADOLU’NUN TARİHİ COĞRAFYASI DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ METİN ALPARSLAN 1 ÖNSÖZ Tarihin iki öğesi vardır: zaman ve mekân. Zaman kavramı kısaca kronoloji olarak da tanımlamamız mümkündür. Kronoloji sayesinde olayların sırasını ve bunun sonucunda tarih için vazgeçilmez olan neden-sonuç ilişkisini doğru bir şekilde oluşturmamız mümkün olabiliyor. Diğer bir şekilde söyleyecek olursak tarihi tam anlamıyla anlayabilmek için tarihin meydana geldiği yeri, yani coğrafyasını iyi bilmemiz ve onun olaylar üzerindeki etkisini iyi hesaplayabilmemiz gerekir. 2 İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ.......................................................................................................................................2 İÇİNDEKİLER...........................................................................................................................3 KISALTMALAR........................................................................................................................8 YAZAR NOTU...........................................................................................................................9 1. Tarihi Coğrafya'ya Giriş ………………………………………………………………...10 1.1. Tarihi Coğrafya Nedir?...............................................................................................16 1.2. Tarihi Coğrafya’nın
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Old Testament
    God, His People & the Messiah: A Survey of Old Testament 20 – DAVID & THE NATIONS (2 SAMUEL 8:1-10:19; 1 CHRONICLES 18:1-19:19) I. David’s Campaigns (2 Samuel 8:1-18; 1 Chronicles 18:1-17) A. The Philistines Defeated (2 Samuel 8:1; 1 Chronicles 18:1) - David attacked the Philistines and completely subdued them. B. Moab Subdued (2 Samuel 8:2; 1 Chronicles 18:2) - David defeated Moab, making them his servants as they brought him tribute. - In defeating them, David had every two out of three prisoners killed and enslaved the third. C. The Defeat of the Arameans (2 Samuel 8:3-14; 1 Chronicles 18:3-13) - David defeated the Aramean kingdom of Zobah to the north of Damascus. - He took many prisoners and hamstrung the horses with the exception of 100 chariots. - David defeated the Syrians when they came to aid the kingdom of Zobah. - The Syrians became David’s servants and he placed garrisons in Syria. - David also took shields of gold and a large amount of bronze from their cities. - The king of Aramean kingdom of Tol sent tribute through his son and became David’s vassal. - All of the treasures that David received from the nations were dedicated to the Lord. - David made a name for himself when he killed 18,000 Syrians in the Valley of Salt. - He placed garrisons throughout all Edom as they also became David’s servants. D. David’s Administration (2 Samuel 8:15-18; 1 Chronicles 18:14-17) - The writer lists all those who served David in administering the kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamath in the Iron Age: the Inscriptions
    Syria Archéologie, art et histoire IV | 2016 Le fleuve rebelle Hamath in the Iron age: the Inscriptions John David Hawkins Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/syria/4887 DOI: 10.4000/syria.4887 ISSN: 2076-8435 Publisher IFPO - Institut français du Proche-Orient Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2016 Number of pages: 183-190 ISBN: 978-2-35159-725-5 ISSN: 0039-7946 Electronic reference John David Hawkins, « Hamath in the Iron age: the Inscriptions », Syria [Online], IV | 2016, Online since 01 December 2018, connection on 07 May 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/syria/4887 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/syria.4887 © Presses IFPO HAMATH IN THE IRON AGE: THE INSCRIPTIONS John David HAWKINS Résumé – Les incriptions découvertes à Hamath et sur son territoire et qui documentent ses souverains au début de l’âge du Fer correspondent à une série de monuments en louvite hiéroglyphique datés du XIe au IXe s. av. J.-C., une unique stèle araméenne du VIIIe s. et quatre stèles assyriennes du début et de la fin du VIIIe s. Deux des souverains peuvent être identifiés avec des princes de Hamath nommés dans les inscriptions royales assyriennes, Irhuleni et Zakur, et un autre dans une lettre akkadienne que lui écrivit un roi de Anat sur le moyen Euphrate, Rudamu. Autant de références importantes pour faire le lien entre la chronologie du royaume de Hamath et le système fiable de datation de l’Assyrie. Mots-clés – Hamath, Anat, sources louvites et assyriennes, rois, XXe-VIIIe s., Irhuleni, Zakur, Rudamu Abstract - The inscriptions found in Hamath and its territory documenting its rulers in the early Iron Age include a series of Hieroglyphic Luwian monuments extending from the 11th to 9th cent.
    [Show full text]
  • H 02-UP-011 Assyria Io02
    he Hebrew Bible records the history of ancient Israel reign. In three different inscriptions, Shalmaneser III and Judah, relating that the two kingdoms were recounts that he received tribute from Tyre, Sidon, and united under Saul (ca. 1000 B.C.) Jehu, son of Omri, in his 18th year, tand became politically separate fol- usually figured as 841 B.C. Thus, Jehu, lowing Solomon’s death (ca. 935 B.C.). the next Israelite king to whom the The division continued until the Assyrians refer, appears in the same Assyrians, whose empire was expand- order as described in the Bible. But he ing during that period, exiled Israel is identified as ruling a place with a in the late eighth century B.C. different geographic name, Bit Omri But the goal of the Bible was not to (the house of Omri). record history, and the text does not One of Shalmaneser III’s final edi- shy away from theological explana- tions of annals, the Black Obelisk, tions for events. Given this problem- contains another reference to Jehu. In atic relationship between sacred the second row of figures from the interpretation and historical accura- top, Jehu is depicted with the caption, cy, historians welcomed the discovery “Tribute of Iaua (Jehu), son of Omri. of ancient Assyrian cuneiform docu- Silver, gold, a golden bowl, a golden ments that refer to people and places beaker, golden goblets, pitchers of mentioned in the Bible. Discovered gold, lead, staves for the hand of the in the 19th century, these historical king, javelins, I received from him.”As records are now being used by schol- scholar Michele Marcus points out, ars to corroborate and augment the Jehu’s placement on this monument biblical text, especially the Bible’s indicates that his importance for the COPYRIGHT THE BRITISH MUSEUM “historical books” of Kings.
    [Show full text]