DOCSLIB.ORG

Building the Iranian Military

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building the Iranian Military Building the Iranian Military UNDERSTANDING TEHRAN’S DEFENSE ACQUISITION AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DECISION-MAKING J. Matthew McInnis April 2017 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 UNDERSTANDING THE IRANIAN MILITARY BUDGET ................................................ 4 UNDERSTANDING IRAN’S DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE AND ACQUISITION .................12 TOWARD A MODEL OF IRI ACQUISITION AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DECISION-MAKING ...........................................................................................18 CONCLUSION: FUTURE TRENDS .......................................................................... 23 ABOUT THE AUTHOR ........................................................................................ 25 NOTES ............................................................................................................ 26 i Executive Summary his study examines how the Islamic Republic of conflict, official defense expenditure as a percentage TIran (IRI) makes defense budgetary decisions, of GDP tends to drop to 2.5 percent or below.3 explores current and future military spending trends, The full scope of the IRGC’s gray budget spend- and assesses Iran’s military industrial base and pro- ing is uncertain but likely represents an additional curement efforts. The principle factors that drive 50 to 100 percent of military outlays.4 This makes total the IRI’s decision-making for weapons development defense spending as a percentage of GDP 4 to 5 per- and acquisition can help form an analytic framework cent most years, although it can be higher.5 During for policymakers seeking to better understand Iran’s peak unconventional operational periods, such as unique procurement and military production pat- when Iran focused on countering the US in Iraq in the terns. With this approach, policymakers can antici- 2000s or the current Syrian civil war, it reaches up to pate which military domains the Iranian military will 6 percent or more.6 most likely invest resources, taking into consideration Iran’s defense industrial base is large and diverse, realistic levels of projected funding and likely require- but it is insufficient in meeting all of Tehran’s stra- ments tied to threat perceptions. tegic requirements. Much of the base is built around The IRI’s annual defense budget does not include the production of missiles, anti-access/area-denial the significant resources the Islamic Revolutionary (A2/AD) naval weapons, and unconventional capabil- Guard Corps (IRGC) generates and expends off the ities for its proxy and asymmetric warfare activities, books or commercial activities that support their as well as to promote deterrence.7 Recent conflicts operations and procurements activities beyond their in Iraq and Syria highlight this orientation’s inher- official allocations. However, the amount the Iranian ent limitations, showing the need for improved expe- leadership will be able and willing to spend on its ditionary warfare capabilities, close air support, and defense and military activities, especially the relative logistics support that may drive future modernization. scale of resources available for Tehran to acquire or Tehran must rely on Russia and other foreign chan- develop new weapons, can be reasonably estimated at nels for procurement and sustainment of advanced any gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate if the conventional capabilities that its own military indus- regime’s threat perceptions are generally understood. tries cannot produce. This is particularly true for air Iran’s military expenditure fluctuation highly cor- defense systems, armor, fighter aircraft, cruise mis- relates to Iran’s GDP, which in turn highly correlates siles, and large submarines.8 Iran looks to indigenize to oil prices. Estimated percentage of GDP dedicated production of military weapons and other platforms to defense spending is, arguably, the optimal way of whenever possible, due to both the state’s relative iso- gauging the IRI’s fiscal prioritization of the military lation and the leadership’s ideological preferences to and for assessing past and future defense growth. avoid dependence on foreign manufacturing for its Official spending on defense averages between 2.5 and defense.9 The IRI will likely continue to maintain cer- 3.0 percent of GDP since the Iran-Iraq War.1 During tain legacy pre-1979 conventional weapon platforms, periods with fear of regime-threatening conventional particularly its aging air force, if technically and stra- military conflict, official defense spending tends to tegically feasible. rise above 3.0 percent of GDP.2 During periods with Tehran will likely prefer spending new resources on minimal fear of regime-threatening conventional proven domestic production or promising research 1 BUILDING THE IRANIAN MILITARY J. MATTHEW MCINNIS and development activities for critical weapon plat- ability to increase defense expenditure: the price of forms, based on analyses of the IRI’s decision-making oil, the rate of GDP growth, and the amount of assets patterns for procurement and domestic production. recovered under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of The IRI will minimize foreign acquisition unless Action (JCPOA).11 After sanctions lift, Tehran will there is a strong likelihood that Iran’s defense indus- likely accelerate procurement and modernization tries will soon be capable of producing such a system in all its military domains, and it may try to achieve indigenously through technology transfer or reverse real gains in building a blue-water navy. A recapital- engineering. ization of its air force or army over the next decade Without a real change in threat perceptions, is doubtful. US policymakers should understand that there will likely be political resistance to pushing debates about what Tehran’s increasingly offensive official military spending above 2.5 percent of GDP military would look like are still underway and driven and total defense spending above 5 or 6 percent of predominately by two factors: threat perceptions GDP (including the gray budget) once Syria and Iraq and resources. Washington and its allies should also operations de-escalate.10 If Iran’s economy grows at recognize they have an enormous capacity to influ- around 4 percent a year, as expected in the near term, ence Iran’s military spending levels and allocations Tehran should still have the resources to improve its by affecting both the regime’s threat calculus and the conventional forces. Three factors dictate Tehran’s foreign investment climate. 2 Introduction he Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) is on the cusp Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, this strategy seems to Tof making significant decisions about what it be the consensus among military leaders, the execu- wants to be as a state and what it wants its military tive branch, and legislators. However, given increas- to become following the implementation of the Joint ing concerns with Khamenei’s health, it is unknown Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). In my pre- if or how a new ayatollah would shift Iran’s approach. vious report, Iranian Concepts of Warfare, I laid out This report examines how Iran makes such deci- an argument that Tehran may have begun shifting its sions about military procurement and production. view on warfare and that it is appropriate and ideologi- Specifically, it attempts to assess: cally acceptable now for the IRI to seek offensive capa- bilities and doctrines in addition to defensive ones. • How should we understand Iranian defense This represents profound change in Tehran’s narrative spending? since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, but it fits well com- ing from a leadership more confident at home and see- • What are the current and future military budget ing evolving threats in its neighborhood. trends? If Iran plans to place a much greater emphasis on conventional offensive weapons than it has in the • What are the strengths and weaknesses of Iran’s past, this will likely require greater resources or a dif- military industrial base? ferent allocation of resources than it has traditionally provided for its military. Historically, unconventional • What drives IRI decision-making on weapons forces dominated Iran’s military and were relatively development and acquisition? inexpensive to maintain. As a result, Iran’s industrial base is not optimized for constructing, equipping, and The study concludes by exploring Tehran’s likely deploying a large conventional force. paths to modernize its military, post JCPOA. Most of However, the JCPOA does provide new finan- these choices are still upcoming, which should offer cial means and, eventually, access to additional mil- policymakers the opportunity to shape the military itary weapons and technology that may allow Iran balance and threat picture in the Persian Gulf and to undergo a real military transformation. Under greater Middle East region. 3 Understanding the Iranian Military Budget s previously discussed in Iranian Concepts of Others maintain that Iran should pursue policies that A Warfare, the IRI approaches economic decision- are more autarkic to ensure that threats of future making through a heavily statist approach. This reflects embargoes and sanctions will have minimal effect.13 the Marxist influences of Ayatollah Khomeini and other This debate is perhaps the biggest economic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iran's Evolving Military Forces
    CSIS_______________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775-3270 To download further data: CSIS.ORG To contact author: [email protected] Iran's Evolving Military Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy July 2004 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Cordesman: Iran's Military forces 7/15/2004 Page ii Table of Contents I. IRAN AND THE GULF MILITARY BALANCE: THE “FOUR CORNERED” BALANCING ACT..........1 The Dynamics of the Gulf Military Balance ..........................................................................................................1 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE NORTH GULF ........................................................................................................................2 II. IRAN’S ERRATIC MILITARY MODERNIZATION.......................................................................................9 THE IRANIAN ARMY ...................................................................................................................................................9 THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS CORPS (PASDARAN).................................................................................14 THE QUDS (QODS) FORCES ......................................................................................................................................15 THE BASIJ AND OTHER PARAMILITARY FORCES ......................................................................................................15 THE IRANIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah's Syrian Quagmire
    Hezbollah’s Syrian Quagmire BY MATTHEW LEVITT ezbollah – Lebanon’s Party of God – is many things. It is one of the dominant political parties in Lebanon, as well as a social and religious movement catering first and fore- Hmost (though not exclusively) to Lebanon’s Shi’a community. Hezbollah is also Lebanon’s largest militia, the only one to maintain its weapons and rebrand its armed elements as an “Islamic resistance” in response to the terms of the Taif Accord, which ended Lebanon’s civil war and called for all militias to disarm.1 While the various wings of the group are intended to complement one another, the reality is often messier. In part, that has to do with compartmen- talization of the group’s covert activities. But it is also a factor of the group’s multiple identities – Lebanese, pan-Shi’a, pro-Iranian – and the group’s multiple and sometimes competing goals tied to these different identities. Hezbollah insists that it is Lebanese first, but in fact, it is an organization that always acts out of its self-interests above its purported Lebanese interests. According to the U.S. Treasury Department, Hezbollah also has an “expansive global network” that “is sending money and operatives to carry out terrorist attacks around the world.”2 Over the past few years, a series of events has exposed some of Hezbollah’s covert and militant enterprises in the region and around the world, challenging the group’s standing at home and abroad. Hezbollah operatives have been indicted for the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri by the UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) in The Hague,3 arrested on charges of plotting attacks in Nigeria,4 and convicted on similar charges in Thailand and Cyprus.5 Hezbollah’s criminal enterprises, including drug running and money laundering from South America to Africa to the Middle East, have been targeted by law enforcement and regulatory agen- cies.
    [Show full text]
  • A WAY FORWARD with IRAN? Options for Crafting a U.S. Strategy
    A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? Options for Crafting a U.S. Strategy THE SOUFAN CENTER FEBRUARY 2021 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? Options for Crafting a U.S. Strategy THE SOUFAN CENTER FEBRUARY 2021 Cover photo: Associated Press Photo/Photographer: Mohammad Berno 2 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY CONTENTS List of Abbreviations 4 List of Figures 5 Key Findings 6 How Did We Reach This Point? 7 Roots of the U.S.-Iran Relationship 9 The Results of the Maximum Pressure Policy 13 Any Change in Iranian Behavior? 21 Biden Administration Policy and Implementation Options 31 Conclusion 48 Contributors 49 About The Soufan Center 51 3 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BPD Barrels Per Day FTO Foreign Terrorist Organization GCC Gulf Cooperation Council IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ICBM Intercontinental Ballistic Missile IMF International Monetary Fund IMSC International Maritime Security Construct INARA Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act INSTEX Instrument for Supporting Trade Exchanges IRGC Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps IRGC-QF Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps - Qods Force JCPOA Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action MBD Million Barrels Per Day PMF Popular Mobilization Forces SRE Significant Reduction Exception 4 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S. STRATEGY LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Iran Annual GDP Growth and Change in Crude Oil Exports 18 Figure 2: Economic Effects of Maximum Pressure 19 Figure 3: Armed Factions Supported by Iran 25 Figure 4: Comparison of Iran Nuclear Program with JCPOA Limitations 28 5 A WAY FORWARD WITH IRAN? OPTIONS FOR CRAFTING A U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UNSC Res 2231
    United Nations S/RES/2231 (2015) Security Council Distr.: General 20 July 2015 Resolution 2231 (2015) th Adopted by the Security Council at its 7488 meeting, on 20 July 2015 The Security Council, Recalling the Statement of its President, S/PRST/2006/15, and its resolutions 1696 (2006), 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008), 1835 (2008), and 1929 (2010), Reaffirming its commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the need for all States Party to that Treaty to comply fully with their obligations, and recalling the right of States Party, in conformity with Articles I and II of that Treaty, to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination, Emphasizing the importance of political and diplomatic efforts to find a negotiated solution guaranteeing that Iran’s nuclear programme is exclusively for peaceful purposes, and noting that such a solution would benefit nuclear non-proliferation, Welcoming diplomatic efforts by China, France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, the United States, the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Iran to reach a comprehensive, long-term and proper solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, culminating in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) concluded on 14 July 2015, (S/2015/544, as attached as Annex A to this resolution) and the establishment of the Joint Commission, Welcoming Iran’s reaffirmation in the JCPOA that it will under no circumstances ever seek, develop
    [Show full text]
  • Design Characteristics of Iran's Ballistic and Cruise Missiles
    Design Characteristics of Iran’s Ballistic and Cruise Missiles Last update: January 2013 Missile Nato or Type/ Length Diameter Payload Range (km) Accuracy ‐ Propellant Guidance Other Name System (m) (m) (kg)/warhead CEP (m) /Stages Artillery* Hasib/Fajr‐11* Rocket artillery (O) 0.83 0.107 6; HE 8.5 ‐ Solid Spin stabilized Falaq‐12* Rocket artillery (O) 1.29 0.244 50; HE 10 Solid Spin stabilized Falaq‐23* Rocket artillery (O) 1.82 0.333 120; HE 11 Solid Spin stabilized Arash‐14* Rocket artillery (O) 2.8 0.122 18.3; HE 21.5 Solid Spin stabilized Arash‐25* Rocket artillery (O) 3.2 0.122 18.3; HE 30 Solid Spin stabilized Arash‐36* Rocket artillery (O) 2 0.122 18.3; HE 18 Solid Spin stabilized Shahin‐17* Rocket artillery (O) 2.9 0.33 190; HE 13 Solid Spin stabilized Shahin‐28* Rocket artillery (O) 3.9 0.33 190; HE 20 Solid Spin stabilized Oghab9* Rocket artillery (O) 4.82 0.233 70; HE 40 Solid Spin stabilized Fajr‐310* Rocket artillery (O) 5.2 0.24 45; HE 45 Solid Spin stabilized Fajr‐511* Rocket artillery (O) 6.6 0.33 90; HE 75 Solid Spin stabilized Falaq‐112* Rocket artillery (O) 1.38 0.24 50; HE 10 Solid Spin stabilized Falaq‐213* Rocket artillery (O) 1.8 0.333 60; HE 11 Solid Spin stabilized Nazeat‐614* Rocket artillery (O) 6.3 0.355 150; HE 100 Solid Spin stabilized Nazeat15* Rocket artillery (O) 5.9 0.355 150; HE 120 Solid Spin stabilized Zelzal‐116* Iran‐130 Rocket artillery (O) 8.3 0.61 500‐600; HE 100‐125 Solid Spin stabilized Zelzal‐1A17* Mushak‐120 Rocket artillery (O) 8.3 0.61 500‐600; HE 160 Solid Spin stabilized Nazeat‐1018* Mushak‐160 Rocket artillery (O) 8.3 0.45 250; HE 150 Solid Spin stabilized Related content is available on the website for the Nuclear Threat Initiative, www.nti.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the Strait of Hormuz: Varying Levels of Lnterdiction
    NPS ARCHIVE 1997.12 ESQUIVEL, J. NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS IRAN AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ: VARYING LEVELS OF LNTERDICTION by James M. Esquivel December, 1997 Co-Advisors: Terry D. Johnson Ahmad Ghoreishi Thesis Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited E6895 KNOX LIBRARY DUDLEY SCHOOL *VAL POSTGRADUATE .dONTEREY CA 93943-5101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1 204, Arlington, VA 22202^302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-01 88) Washington DC 20503 AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) REPORT DATE REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1997 Master's Thesis IRAN AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ: VARYING LEVELS OF INTERDICTION 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Esquivel, James M. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION Monterey CA 93943-5000 REPORT NUMBER SPONSOPJNG/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 1 . SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 1 1 . SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Deterring Iran After the Nuclear Deal
    MARCH 2017 COVER PHOTO NIEL HESTER | FLICKR 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 202 887 0200 | www.csis.org Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301 459 3366 | www.rowman.com Deterring Iran After the Nuclear Deal PROJECT DIRECTORS AND EDITORS Kathleen H. Hicks Melissa G. Dalton CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Melissa G. Dalton Thomas Karako Jon B. Alterman J. Matthew McInnis Michael Connell Hijab Shah Michael Eisenstadt Michael Sulmeyer ISBN 978-1-4422-7993-3 Farideh Farhi Ian Williams Kathleen H. Hicks 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington,Ë|xHSLEOCy279933z DC 20036v*:+:!:+:! 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Blank MARCH 2017 Deterring Iran after the Nuclear Deal PROJ ECT DIRECTORS AND EDITORS Kathleen H. Hicks Melissa G. Dalton CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Melissa G. Dalton Thomas Karako Jon B. Alterman J. Matthew McInnis Michael Connell Hijab Shah Michael Eisenstadt Michael Sulmeyer Farideh Farhi Ian Williams Kathleen H. Hicks Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 594-68742_ch00_6P.indd 1 3/13/17 7:13 AM About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. T oday, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organ ization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah's Missiles and Rockets
    JULY 2017 CSIS BRIEFS CSIS Hezbollah’s Missiles and Rockets An Overview By Shaan Shaikh and Ian Williams JULY 2018 THE ISSUE Hezbollah is the world’s most heavily armed non-state actor, with a large and diverse stockpile of unguided artillery rockets, as well as ballistic, antiair, antitank, and antiship missiles. Hezbollah views its rocket and missile arsenal as its primary deterrent against Israeli military action, while also useful for quick retaliatory strikes and longer military engagements. Hezbollah’s unguided rocket arsenal has increased significantly since the 2006 Lebanon War, and the party’s increased role in the Syrian conflict raises concerns about its acquisition of more sophisticated standoff and precision-guided missiles, whether from Syria, Iran, or Russia. This brief provides a summary of the acquisition history, capabilities, and use of these forces. CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & middle east INTERNATIONAL STUDIES program CSIS BRIEFS | WWW.CSIS.ORG | 1 ezbollah is a Lebanese political party public source information and does not cover certain topics and militant group with close ties to such as rocket strategies, evolution, or storage locations. Iran and Syria’s Assad regime. It is the This brief instead focuses on the acquisition history, world’s most heavily armed non-state capabilities, and use of these forces. actor—aptly described as “a militia trained like an army and equipped LAND ATTACK MISSILES AND ROCKETS like a state.”1 This is especially true Hwith regard to its missile and rocket forces, which Hezbollah 107 AND 122 MM KATYUSHA ROCKETS has arrayed against Israel in vast quantities. The party’s arsenal is comprised primarily of small, man- portable, unguided artillery rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Men in Baghdad
    IRAQ Iran’s men in Baghdad Three Iranian-backed Shi’ite militias have together become the most powerful military force in Iraq BY BABAK DEHGHANPISHEH BAGHDAD, NOVEMBER 12, 2014 PULITZER PRIZE ENTRY INTERNATIONAL REPORTING 1 IRAQ IRAN’S MEN IN BAGHDAD mong the thousands of militia fighters who flocked to northern Iraq to battle militant Agroup Islamic State over the summer was Qais al-Khazali. Like the fighters, Khazali wore green camouflage. But he also sported a shoulder-strapped pistol and sunglasses and was flanked by armed bodyguards. When he was not on the battlefield, the 40-year-old Iraqi donned the robes and white turban of a cleric. Khazali is the head of a militia called Asaib Ahl al-Haq that is backed by Iran. Thanks to his position he is one of the most feared and respected militia leaders in Iraq, and one of Iran’s most important POWER: Iranian-backed Qais Khazali, leader of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, votes representatives in the country. in Iraq’s parliamentary election in April. Below, members of his group His militia is one of three small Iraqi Shi’ite carry coffins of fighters killed during clashes with Islamic State in July. On armies, all backed by Iran, which together have the cover, a fighter from the Badr Brigades guards a checkpoint seized become the most powerful military force in Iraq since from Islamic State militants outside Amerli in early September. REUTERS/ the collapse of the national army in June. AHMED JADALLAH (ABOVE, COVER); REUTERS/ALAA AL-MARJANI (BELOW) Alongside Asaib Ahl al-Haq, there are the Badr Brigades, formed in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq War, and the younger and more secretive Kataib Hezbollah.
    [Show full text]
  • Badr Brigade
    Badr Organization Type of Organization: militia, political party, religious, social services provider, terrorist, transnational, violent Ideologies and Affiliations: Iranian-sponsored, Islamist, jihadist, Khomeinist, Shiite Place(s) of Origin: Iraq Year of Origin: 19831 Founder(s): Iraqi Shiites loyal to the al-Hakim Shiite clerical dynasty,2 with the help of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)3 Place(s) of Operation: Iraq, Syria 4 Also Known As: 5 • Badr Brigade 6 • Badr Brigades 7 • Badr Corps 8 • Badr Organization of Reconstruction and Development 9 • Badr Organisation in Iraq 10 • Martyr Mohamed Baqir al-Sadr Forces 1 Jon Lee Anderson, “The Candidate,” New Yorker, February 2, 2004, http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/02/02/the-candidate-3; Mahan Abedin, “Dossier: The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI),” Middle East Intelligence Bulletin, 5 (October 2003): 10, http://www.meforum.org/meib/articles/0310_iraqd.htm. 2 Eli Lake, “Iran's Militias Are Taking Over Iraq’s Army,” Bloomberg View, February 3, 2015, http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-02-03/exclusive-iran-s-militias-are-taking-over-iraq-s-army. 3 Kenneth Katzman, “Iran’s Activities and Influence in Iraq,” Congressional Research Service, June 4, 2009, http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA501453. 4 Michael Knights, “Iran’s Foreign Legion: The Role of Iraqi Shiite Militias in Syria,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, June 23, 2013, http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/irans-foreign-legion-the-role-
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-98-176 China B-279891
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Joint Economic GAO Committee, U.S. Senate June 1998 CHINA Military Imports From the United States and the European Union Since the 1989 Embargoes GAO/NSIAD-98-176 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-279891 June 16, 1998 The Honorable James Saxton Chairman, Joint Economic Committee United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: In June 1989, the United States and the members of the European Union 1 embargoed the sale of military items to China to protest China’s massacre of demonstrators in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. You have expressed concern regarding continued Chinese access to foreign technology over the past decade, despite these embargoes. As requested, we identified (1) the terms of the EU embargo and the extent of EU military sales to China since 1989, (2) the terms of the U.S. embargo and the extent of U.S. military sales to China since 1989, and (3) the potential role that such EU and U.S. sales could play in addressing China’s defense needs. In conducting this review, we focused on military items—items that would be included on the U.S. Munitions List. This list includes both lethal items (such as missiles) and nonlethal items (such as military radars) that cannot be exported without a license.2 Because the data in this report was developed from unclassified sources, its completeness and accuracy may be subject to some uncertainty. The context for China’s foreign military imports during the 1990s lies in Background China’s recent military modernization efforts.3 Until the mid-1980s, China’s military doctrine focused on defeating technologically superior invading forces by trading territory for time and employing China’s vast reserves of manpower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Institute for Near East Policy August
    THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY n AUGUST 2020 n PN84 PHOTO CREDIT: REUTERS © 2020 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. FARZIN NADIMI n April 22, 2020, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force (IRGC-ASF) Olaunched its first-ever satellite, the Nour-1, into orbit. The launch, conducted from a desert platform near Shahrud, about 210 miles northeast of Tehran, employed Iran’s new Qased (“messenger”) space- launch vehicle (SLV). In broad terms, the launch showed the risks of lifting arms restrictions on Iran, a pursuit in which the Islamic Republic enjoys support from potential arms-trade partners Russia and China. Practically, lifting the embargo could facilitate Iran’s unhindered access to dual-use materials and other components used to produce small satellites with military or even terrorist applications. Beyond this, the IRGC’s emerging military space program proves its ambition to field larger solid-propellant missiles. Britain, France, and Germany—the EU-3 signatories of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the 2015 Iran nuclear deal is known—support upholding the arms embargo until 2023. The United States, which has withdrawn from the deal, started a process on August 20, 2020, that could lead to a snapback of all UN sanctions enacted since 2006.1 The IRGC’s Qased space-launch vehicle, shown at the Shahrud site The Qased-1, for its part, succeeded over its three in April. stages in placing the very small Nour-1 satellite in a near circular low earth orbit (LEO) of about 425 km. The first stage involved an off-the-shelf Shahab-3/ Ghadr liquid-fuel missile, although without the warhead section, produced by the Iranian Ministry of Defense.2 According to ASF commander Gen.
    [Show full text]