D.CORAL

STUDIESONNOVELIMMUNOGENICPROTEINSOF

CLOSTRIDIUMCHAUVOEI

DĐDEMCORAL

METU,2009 DECEMBER2009

STUDIESONNOVELIMMUNOGENICPROTEINSOF CHAUVOEI ATHESISSUBMITTEDTO THEGRADUATESCHOOLOFNATURALANDAPPLIEDSCIENCES OF MIDDLEEASTTECHNICALUNIVERSITY BY DĐDEMCORAL INPARTIALFULFILLMENTOFTHEREQUIREMENTS FOR THEDEGREEOFMASTEROFSCIENCE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY DECEMBER2009

Approvalofthethesis: STUDIESONNOVELIMMUNOGENICPROTEINSOF CLOSTRIDIUMCHAUVOEI submitted by DĐDEM CORAL in partial fulfillment of the requirementsforthedegreeof MasterofScienceBiotechnology Department,MiddleEastTechnicalUniversity by, Prof.Dr.CananÖzgen Dean,GraduateSchoolof NaturalandAppliedSciences Prof.Dr.ĐnciEroğlu HeadofDepartment, Biotechnology Prof.Dr.GülayÖzcengiz Supervisor, BiologyDept.,METU Prof.Dr.UfukBakır CoSupervisor, ChemistryEng.Dept.,METU ExaminingCommitteeMembers: Assoc.ProfDr.SertaçÖnde BiologyDept.,METU Prof.Dr.GülayÖzcengiz BiologyDept.,METU Assoc.ProfDr.AyeGülGözen BiologyDept.,METU Assoc.Prof.Dr.BülentĐçgen BiologyDept.,KırıkkaleUniversity Assist.Prof.Dr.ÇağdaSon BiologyDept.,METU Date:11.12.2009

I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethicalconduct.Ialsodeclarethat,asrequiredbytheserulesand conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results thatarenotoriginaltothiswork.

Name,Lastname:DidemCoral

Signature:

iii

ABSTRACT STUDIESONNOVELIMMUNOGENICPROTEINSOF

CLOSTRIDIUMCHAUVOEI

CoralDidem

M.Sc.,DepartmentofBiotechnology

Supervisor:Prof.Dr.GülayÖzcengiz

Cosupervisor:Prof.Dr.UfukBakır

December2009,82pages

Clostridiumchauvoei isagrampositive,sporeforminganaerobicbacterium. Itisthepathogenicagentof,adiseasecausingserioustoxemiaand highmortalityincattle,sheepandmanyotherdomesticandwildanimals.It is considered the most important Clostridium producing economic losses in livestock. Typically, animals infected with blackleg die rapidly without any signsofillness.Animalsquicklydiewithin12to48hoursaftercontracting the disease. Therefore, the control of this disease is done by commercial vaccines consisting of whole formolized cultures. Immunity against C. chauvoei is associated with whole cell, including its somatic and flagellar antigens while in other clostridial diseases, protective immunity is obtained bytheuseofvaccinescontainingtoxoids.Moreover,itisessentialtoobtain newinformationaboutthesomaticantigensof C.chauvoei .

iv

Proteomics is the study of the proteome, the protein complement of the genome. The proteome has been defined as the entire complement of proteins expressed by a cell, organism, or tissue type, and accordingly, proteomics is the study of this complement expressed at a given time or undercertainenvironmentalconditions.2DEwithImmobilizedpHGradients (IPGs) combined with protein identification by Mass Spectrometry (MS) is currently the workhorse for proteomics. Much of information about immunogeniccomponentcanbederivedfromproteomicscoupledtoWestern blotting,namelyimmunoproteomics. Ourstudyconstitutesthefirstimmunoproteomicanalysisof C.chauvoei to identifycandidateimmunogenicantigensfordevelopmentofnewvaccines. Analyses were performed by Western blot and dot blot techniques against thewholecellextractproteinsof C.chauvoei separatedby2DE.Firstly,the growthconditionsoftwodifferentstrains, C.chauvoei ATCC11957and C. chauvoei 20 were optimized. After mice immunization studies with experimental vaccines prepared, sera were obtained for evaluation of the immunoglobulin G antibody level by ELISA. After high level of antibody responsedetermination,1DE,2DEandimmunoblotstudieswereperformed forthecharacterizationofimmunogenicproteins. Inthestudy,atotalof460proteinspotscouldbedetectedonthe2DEgels bythehelpofDelta2Dimageanalysissoftwareand30ofthemwerereacted with polyclonal antibodies against inactivated whole cells of C. chauvoei. Amongthese30spots,and8ofthemcouldbecharacterizedbyMALDITOF MSanalyses.Ofthese8spotsrevealedfourdifferentgeneproducts(distinct ORFs).Ornithinedecarboxylase,methionineadenosyltransferase,glucose6 phosphate isomerase, and flagellin protein FliB (C) are the characterized proteins. Glucose6phosphate isomerase has been identified as an

v

immunogenic protein for a pathogenic microbe and in C. chauvoei for the first time. Methionine adenosyltransferase and ornithine decarboxylation were identified as immunogenic for C. chauvoei for the first time. The last defined protein is the flagellin protein FliB(C) which is known to be major immunogenicproteinof C.chauvoei . Keywords:Protein,Proteome, Clostridium chauvoei, 2DE,ImmobilizedpH Gradients , MALDI TOF MS, Immunoproteomics, Immunoblotting, Western Blot,DotBlot,ELISA.

vi

ÖZ

CLOSTRIDIUMCHAUVOEI’NĐNYENĐĐMMUNOJENĐKPROTEĐNLERĐ ÜZERĐNEÇALIMALAR

Coral,Didem

YüksekLisansBiyoteknolojiBölümü

TezYöneticisi:Prof.Dr.GülayÖzcengiz

OrtakTezYöneticisi:Prof.Dr.UfukBakır

Aralık2009,82sayfa

Clostridiumchauvoei ,grampozitif,sporlu,anaerobikbirbakteritürüdür.Bu bakteri,cidditoksemiketkisiolanvebüyükbahayvan,koyunvediğerevcil veyabanihayvanlardayüksekorandaölümenedenolanyanıkarahastalığının etkeni olarak bilinmektedir. Çiftliklerde ekonomik olarak kayba yol açan en önemli Clostridium türünün C. chauvoei olduğu düünülmektedir. Genel olarak, enfeksiyona yakalanan hayvanlar, hiçbir belirti göstermeden 1248 saat içinde ani bir ekilde ölürler. Bu nedenle, hastalığın kontrolünde aı tercih edilmektedir. Bu aılar, toksoid içeren diğer Clostridium türleri için kullanılan aılardan farklı olarak, formalin ile inaktive edilmi, hücresel ve flajellaantigenlerideiçerenaılardır.Bununlaberaber,bubakterininhücresel antijenleriiçinyenibilgilereihtiyaçduyulmaktadır.

vii

Proteom çalıması olan proteomik, genomun protein seviyesinde ifadesi için tamamlayıcısıdır. Proteom, hücre, doku yada organizma tarafından üretilen bütün proteinler olarak tanımlanmaktadır ve buna göre, proteomik belirli zaman ve belirli çevre koullarında üretilen bütün proteinlere ait global bir çalımadır.2DEveIPG(ImmobilizedpHGradient)lerinproteintanımlaması için MALDI TOF MS analizleri ile birleimi proteomik’in en geleneksel araçlarıdır. Patojenlerin immunojenik yapılarıyla ilgili en kapsamlı bilgi, proteomik teknolojisinin, Western blot analiziyle birlemesini içeren, immunoproteomikyöntemlerleeldeedilebilir. Buçalıma, C.chauvoei içinyeniaılarıngelitirilmesindekullanılabilecekaı adayı antijenlerin tanımlanması amacıyla yapılan ilk C. chauvoei immunoproteomik analizini içermektedir. C. chauvoei’ nin tam hücre ekstratının 2DE’de ayrılmı proteinlerine karı Western blot ve dot blot tekniklerikullanılarakanalizlergerçekletirilmitir.Buamaçla,ikifarklısuun (C. chauvoei ATCCvePendik)üremekoullarıoptimizeedilmivehazırlanan tam hücre deneysel aılarla farelerde yapılan immunizasyon çalımaları sonrasında ELISA yöntemiyle IgG antikor düzeyleri incelenmitir. Yüksek oranda antikor yanıtı oluumunun belirlenmesinden sonra immunogen proteinleritanımlamakiçin1DE,2DEveimmunblotçalımalarıyapılmıtır. Çalımamızda 2DE jellerinden Delta2D görüntü analiz yazılımı kullanılarak 460proteinspotubelirlenmitirve30spotC.chauvoei’nininaktiftamhücre poliklonal antikorları ile immunreaksiyon vermitir. Bu 30 spotun 8 tanesi MALDITOFMSileanalizedilmitir.Bu8spotun4farklıgenürününü(farklı ORF’leri) temsil ettiği görülmütür. Ornitin dekarboksilaz, metionin adenosiltransferaz, glukoz6fosfat isomeraz, ve flagellin protein FliB (C) proteinleri tanımlanan proteinlerdir. Bunlardan glukoz6fosfat isomeraz ilk

viii

kez patojenik bir organizmada immunojenik protein olarak bulunmutur. Diğer yandan, bu çalımada tanımlanan immunojenik proteinlerinden methioninadenosiltransferazveornitindekarboksilaz’ınimmunojenikolduğu C. chauvoei özelinde ilk kez bu çalımada gösterilmitir. Son olarak, C. chauvoei’ninenimmunojenikproteiniolarakbilinenflagellinproteinFliB(C) tanımlanmıtır. Anahtar kelimeler: Protein, Proteom, Clostridium chauvoei, 2DE, IPG (Immobilized pH Gradient) , MALDI TOF MS, Immunoproteomik, Đmmunoblotting,Westernblot,Dotblot,ELISA.

ix

ToMyGrandmother

x

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Iwouldliketoexpressmysincerestappreciationtomysupervisor,Prof. Dr.GülayÖzcengiz.Hervaluableguidance,contributions,detailedcomments andinsighthavebeenofgreatvaluetome.IwouldalsoliketothankDr. Erkan Özcengiz for deep guidance, encouragement and invaluable help in completionofmythesis.

IwouldliketothankHandeSelamoğluforherpatience,understanding, greatfriendshipandadvices.Icouldnothavewishedbettercollaborator.My specialthanksgotoLütfiyeÖzdirekandĐsmailÖğülürfortheirendlesshelp, toleranceandgreatfriendship.Iamsurewewillalwaystogetherinourlife.

IwouldliketothankVolkanYıldırımforspendingsomuchtimeinMS analysisofmydataandhispatienceinansweringmyquestions.Iwouldalso thank to the group in the University of Greifswald Department Of Microbiology for making available all the equipment for MALDITOF MS analysis.

I would also like to express my great gratitude to the people in proteome group, Burcu Tefon, Elvin Đcan and Aslı Aras Takın for endless help and guidance. Very special thanks to my lab mates Orhan Özcan, AslıhanKurt,SezerOkay,ErkamGündoğdu,EmrahAltındi,GülizVanlı,Elif Tekin, Çiğdem Yılmaz and Eser Ünsaldı for their great friendship and cooperation.

Iwouldliketoexpressmyheartfultomygrandmother,GüngörReyhan and my parents, Cihan Coral and Semiha Reyhan for their kind understanding,patienceandendlesssupportduringmyschoollife.

And never enough thanks to one, my husband M.Özgür ahin. It is invaluabletohavehiminmylifeandfeelhissupportalwayswithme.

xi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ...... iv

ÖZ ...... vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...... xi

TABLEOFCONTENTS ...... xii

CHAPTERS

1INTRODUCTION ...... 1

1.1 Genus Clostridium ...... 1

1.2 VeterinaryClostridialDiseases ...... 3

1.3 C.chauvoei andBlackleg ...... 8

1.4 BlacklegVaccine ...... 11

1.5 VirulenceFactorsof C.chauvoei ...... 13

1.5.1 Flagella ...... 13

1.5.2 Toxins ...... 13

1.6 Proteomics...... 16

1.6.1 WhyProteomics?...... 17

1.6.2 ProteomicTool...... 18

1.6.3 StepsinProteomeWork...... 18

1.7 ImmunoproteomicsofPathogenic ...... 21

1.7.1 Immunoproteomicapproachestopathogenic Species ...... 24

1.8 AimandScopeofthepresentstudy ...... 26

2MATERIALSANDMETHODS ...... 27 xii

2.1 BacterialStrainsandMaintanance ...... 27

2.2 CultureMedia ...... 27

2.3 BuffersandSolutions...... 27

2.4 ChemicalsandEnzymes...... 28

2.5 CultureConditions ...... 28

2.6 HemolyticAssay...... 28

2.7 PreparationsofProteinSamplesfor1DE,2DEand ELISAStudies...... 30

2.7.1 WholeCultureLysate ...... 30

2.7.2 Sonication...... 30

2.7.3 WholeCellExtraction ...... 30

2.8 ProteinEstimation ...... 31

2.9 1DgelElectrophoresisandWesternBlotting ...... 33

2.10 Preparationof C.chauvoei Vaccines...... 35

2.11 ImmunizationforELISAandImmunoblotAnalysis...... 36

2.12 ELISA ...... 36

2.13 2DPAGEand2DEWesternBlotting...... 37

2.14 Dotblot...... 38

2.15 Evaluationof2DEData...... 38

2.16 Proteinidentification ...... 38

2.17 DatabaseSearches ...... 39

3RESULTSANDDISCUSSION...... 40

3.1 CulturalGrowth ...... 40

3.2 HemolysinActivity ...... 41

3.3 AntibodyResponse ...... 43

xiii

3.4 ProteinProfilesin1DEandImmunoblots ...... 44

3.5 PreparationofProteomeSamplesfor2DE ...... 50

3.6 ProteomesandImmunoproteomesof C.chauvoei ...... 51

3.7 EvaluationofImmunogenicProteins...... 58

3.7.1 MethionineAdenosyltransferase...... 58

3.7.2 Glucose6phosphateIsomerase ...... 59

3.7.3 OrnithineDecarboxylase ...... 61

3.7.4 Flagellin ...... 61

4CONCLUSION ...... 64

REFERENCES ...... 66

APPENDICES ...... 74

xiv

LISTOFTABLES

Table1. Pathogenicclostridialdiseasessummary ...... 4 Table2. PreparationofStandardsforBradfordAssay ...... 32 Table3. SDSPolyacrylamideGelPreparation ...... 33 Table4. Listofidentifiedimmunogenicwholecellproteinsof C.chouvoei ATCC11957 ...... 57

xv

LISTOFFIGURES

Figure1: Stainedpusfromamixedanaerobicinfection.Atleastthree differentclostridiaareapparent...... 2 Figure2: C.chauvoei sporesinatissuesmear.Theyareoval,centralto subterminalandbulgethemothercell.Thecitron(lemonshaped)formsare characterisitic(Gramstainx1000)(Quinn,1994)...... 8 Figure3:Thecourseofgrowth( ◊)of C.chauvoei ATCC11957andpH change(□)...... 41 Figure4:Growthof C. chauvoei andexpressionofhemolysinactivityas functionaloftime...... 42 Figure5: IgGlevelsinducedby C.chauvoei strainsasdeterminedbyELISA testswhenmicewereimmunizedwithexperimentalvaccinesofstrainsATCC 11957and20...... 44 Figure6: Silverstained1DESDSPAGEgelofwholeculturelysateof C. chauvoei ATCC11957(A)andWesternblotanalysisofwholeculturelysates of C.chauvoei ATCC11957byusingserumobtainedfrommiceimmunized with C.chauvoei ATCC119571daygrownformalininactivatedwholecell vaccine(B)...... 46 Figure7:Silverstained1DESDSPAGEgelofwholeculturelysateof C. chauvoei 20(A)andWesternblotanalysisofwholeculturelysateof C. chauvoei20byusingserumobtainedfrommiceimmunizedwith C.chauvoei ATCC119571daygrownformalininactivatedculturevaccine(B)...... 47 Figure8: Westernblotanalysisofwholeculturelysatesofboth C.chauvoei ATCC11957and C.chauvoei 20byusingserumobtainedfrommice immunizedwith C.chauvoei 201daygrownformalininactivatedwholecell vaccine...... 48 Figure9: SilverstainedSDSPAGEgelofwholeculturelysatesof C. chauvoei ATCC11957atdifferenttimesduringcultivation...... 49 Figure10:Areference2DEmap(mastergel)oftotalproteomeof C.chauvoei ATCC11957(pI310)...... 54 Figure11:Westernblotanalysisofthewholecellproteomeof C.chauvoei ATCC11957. The immunogenicproteinsareidentifiedincircle .Theserum wasobtainedfrommiceimmunizedwithinactivatedwholecells of C. chauvoei ATCC11957...... 55 Figure12:Representationofidentifiedimmunogenicproteinsof C. chauvoei ATCC119572DEgel...... 56

xvi

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Genus Clostridium

Clostridia are sporeforming, obligatory anaerobic bacteria in the Phylum . Most clostridia will not grow under aerobic conditions and vegetativecellsarekilledbyexposuretoO 2,buttheendosporesofmany species are extremely sturdy and survive extended boiling in water and exposuretoair.Sporesgerminateunderconditionsfavorableforvegetative growth, such as anaerobiosis and presence of organic substrates. They usually stain gram positive especially in young cultures. Cells are rod shaped with rounded or pointed ends. For motility, peritrichous flagella usuallypresent.Theyformovalorsphericalendosporeswhichdistendthe cellterminallyorsubterminally.(Cato etal .,1986)

1

Figure1:Stainedpusfromamixedanaerobicinfection.Atleastthree differentclostridiaareapparent.

Thisgenuscomprisesabout150metabolicallydiversespeciesofanaerobes that are widespread in the environment. They are found in soil, sewage, marine sediments, and the intestinal tracts of humans and other animals andindecayinganimalandplantproducts.Becauseoftheubiquityofthese organisms,theyfindtheirwayintowounds,foods,andfeedsandsomeare pathogenicforanimals,usuallybutnotalwaysmediatedbytheirtoxins. Fromtheevolutionaryperspective,clostridiaareconsideredtobethemost ancientbacteria.Itisbelievedthatpresentday Mollicutes ( Eubacteria )have evolved regressively (i.e., by genome reduction) from grampositive clostridialike ancestors with a low GC content in DNA. Several species of clostridia (e.g., C. perfringens , C. botulinum , and C . tetani ) are known opportunistic toxinproducing pathogens in animals and humans. Some speciesarecapableofproducingorganicsolvents(acetone,ethanol,etc), molecular hydrogen and other useful compounds. There are also species that can fix molecular nitrogen and thus are important participants in biologicalturnaroundofnitrogencompoundsinnature.20of83 Clostridium specieslistedinBergey’sManualofSystemicBacteriologyarepathogenicor

2

elseencounteredclinicalorenvironmentalspecimensrelatingtoillnessor infectionsinhumansorotheranimals(Cato etal .,1986). 1.2 VeterinaryClostridialDiseases Veterinary Clostridial diseases are usually acute and are not contagious. Thus, common predisposing causes result in to outbreaks. The bacteria responsiblearefrequentlyfoundinsoilwithhighorganiccontentaswellas intestinal tracts of healthy animals. They are very resistant to the many environmentalconditions,andorganismsareabletoliedormantforyears. The source of the infection is almost always their presence in the environment,notanotheranimal(Kayne etal .,2004).

The important veterinary clostridial diseases are; Blackleg caused by C. chauvoei , Bacillary haemoglobinuria caused by C. haemolyticum , tetanus causedby C.tetani, malignantedema,braxycausedby C. septicum ,black diseasecausedby C. novyi typeB,pulpykidneyorovereatingdisease caused by C. perfringens type D, lamb dysentery caused by C. perfringens typeB,bigheadandmalignantedemacausedby C. novyi typeA,struckcausedby C. perfringens typeC,abomasitiscausedby C. sordellii ,andbotulismcausedby C. botulinum .Ineachcase,oneor more exotoxins or bacterial membrane proteins lead to the pathogenesis.TheseorganismsarelistedinTable1,alongwiththeir majortoxinsandtheiractivitiesandthediseasestheycause.

3

Table1.Pathogenicclostridialdiseasessummary

Clostridium MajorToxins/ Protein Activity Disease Host Species Size(kDa) AntigenicProteins

C. tetani Neurotoxin 150 Tetanus Tetanus Horses,ruminants, humansandother animals Tetanolysin 48 OxygenLabilehemolysin

4 4 C. botulinum Neurotoxin 150 Botulism Botulism Manyanimalspeciesand man ComponentI 50 ADPribosylation (typesAF) Binding ComponentII 105 Binding C. chauvoei Flagella 47 Majorvirulancefactor Blackleg Cattle,sheep,pigs

Hemolysin 27 Oxygenlabilehemolysin

Table1 Cont’d

Clostridium MajorToxins/ Protein Activity Disease Host Species Size(kDa) AntigenicProteins

C. septicum Alpha 46 Lethal,necrosis,hemolytic Malignant Cattle,Sheep,pigs Edema, Sheep Braxy,

5 5

C. novyi

TypeA Alpha 280 Lethal,edematizing, Sheep Bigheadoframs cytotoxicactivity Beta 43 PhospholipaseC,lecithinase Cattle, Gasgangrene activity sheep

Gamma 30 PhospholipaseC,hemolysis TypeB Alpha 280 Lethal,edematizing, Sheep, Black Disease (Necrotic cytotoxicactivity cattle hepatitis) Beta 43 PhospholipaseC,lecithinase activity

Table1 Cont’d

Clostridium MajorToxins/ Protein Activity Disease Host Species Size(kDa) AntigenicProteins

C. Beta 45 PhosholipaseC,hemolysin Cattle, BacillaryHaemoglobuniria haemolyticum sheep

C. sordelli Alpha 43 PhospholipaseC Cattle, Gasgangrene Beta Lethal sheep, HT(hemorogictoksin) 300 horses 6 6 LT(lethaltoxin) 240 Hemolysin 43 Oxygenlabilehemolysin

C. perfringens

TypeB Alpha 43 Alpha Lambs Lambdysentery (under3 Beta 40 Beta yearsold)

Enterotoxemia Beta2 28 Beta2 Neonatal calves, Epsilon 40 Lethal,permease/ foals enterotoxemia

Table1 Cont’d

Clostridium MajorToxins/ Protein Activity Disease Host Species Size(kDa) AntigenicProteins

TypeC Alpha 43 Phospholipase Piglets, Haemorrhagic C/myonecrosis calves, enterotoxemia Beta 40 Lethal,necrotic/ enterotoxemia foals, Struck lambs Beta2 28 Necroticentiritis Adult 7 7 sheep

Chickens

TypeD Alpha 43 Phospholipase Sheep Pulpykidneydiseases C/myonecrosis Epsilon 40 Lethal,permease/ Goat, enterotoxemia calves

ToxinB 360470 Cytotoxin/AAPMC

(ConstructedfromHatheway,1990;Quinn,1994)

1.3 C.chauvoei andBlackleg

C.chauvoei isagrampositive,motile,obligatelyanaerobicrodthatproduces subterminalorsubcentralspores(HirshD. etal., 2004) Clostridiumchauvoei requires strict anaerobic conditions and media rich in cysteine and water solublevitamins(Dwight etal .,2004)

Figure 2: C. chauvoei spores in a tissue smear. They are oval, central to subterminalandbulgethemothercell.Thecitron(lemonshaped)formsare characterisitic(Gramstainx1000)(Quinn,1994).

C.chauvoei and C.septicum aresimilarorganismsandconsideredbysome authors as the members of the same species (MacLennan, 1962; Willis, 1969).Theyaredifficulttodistinguishfromeachotheronthebasisoftheir physiologicalandtoxigeniccharacteristics.Theorganismsaregrampositive rods (often gram negative in older cultures). Both organisms ferment

8

glucose,fructose,lactose,maltose,andmannose.Bothproduce aceticand butyric acids as metabolic end products. It has been reported that long chains of bacilli or long filaments in the serous cavities and on the liver surface in infected animals are formed by C. septicum, but not by C. chauvoei (Heller,1920;Willis,1969). The major distinction is the difference in the diseases they cause. These organismswereencounteredearlyinthehistoryofmicrobiologybecauseof their involvement in diseases of cattle and sheep (Heller, 1920). In the middle of the 19th century, blackleg (Rauschbrand, Gerausch, charbon symptomatique) and malignant edema were confused with anthrax (Milzbrand, charbon). All three diseases under their various names were considered as variants of one and the same disease. Bollinger reported in 1875thatnumerousshortbacteriaobservedmicroscopicallyintissuesfrom cattle dying from Gerausch had no similarity what so ever with the filamentous anthrax bacillus. Arloing, Cornevin, and Thomas described the blackleg organism in some detail in 1880. The name Clostridium chauvoei was given in honor of the French veterinarian Auguste Chauveau (Willis, 1969). C.chauvoei belongstothehistotoxicclostridiaanditisthepathogenicagent ofblackleg,isadiseasecharacterizedbyemphysematousinflammationand serohemorrhagiccontentinlargemusclemasses,anditisclassifiedasone of the gangrenes. It causes serious toxemia and high mortality in cattle, sheepandmanyotherruminantsassociatedwithsporecontaminatedsoil.It is considered the most important clostridium producing economic losses in livestock(SmithandWilliams,1984;Corpus etal .,2008).Animalsotherthan ruminants are rarely infected. Young growing ruminants on pasture are especiallysensitiveto C.chauvoei .Survivalof C. chauvoei insoilmaybea

9

significant factor, since the disease occurs yearafteryear on the same premises,usuallyinwellfedcattlelessthan3yearsold.Theseclostridiaare normallypresentinthedigestivetract ofmanyanimals,andenterthesoil from the carcasses of animals that die of clostridial infection. The bacteria existinhighnumbersinsoilwherecattlegraze.Thisinfectionbeginswhen the susceptible animal ingests the endospores. The endospores then cross over the gastrointestinal tract and enter the bloodstream. Endospores are deposited in tissue throughout the animal body. They lie dormant in the tissue until they become activated and trigger the disease. Under certain conditions such as bruising of muscle, these organisms begin to multiply, produce toxins and other antigenic components that may be highly fatal (Richey,2004). Conditions favoring spore germination, bacterial growth, and toxin productioncauseformation oflocallesionsmarkedbyedema,hemorrhage and, myofibrillar necrosis. The centers of lesions become dry, dark emphysematous due to bacterial fermentation, while the periphery edematous and hemoragic. A rancid butter odor is typical (Hirsh D. et al ., 2004). The mechanism of infection is not clearly understood, but ingestion is probably the most common route of exposure in cattle: various tissues, especially skeletal muscle, are seeded with spores from the intestine. The organism remains dormant until the muscle provides conditions that favor germination, multiplication, and toxin production (Floyd, 1994). Clinically, thereishighfever,anorexia,anddepressionacutelamenessanddeath.The onsetissudden.Animalsmaybefounddeadwithoutpremonitorysigns.

10

1.4 BlacklegVaccine Sincethediseaseisoftenrapidlyfatalandusuallyaffectscattle6monthsto 2 year of age, vaccination is accepted as cheap insurance. Commercial vaccines consisting of whole formalized cultures are used for controlling of the disease. These vaccines are generally presented as polyvalent formulations with other clostridia species (Crichton et al ., 1990). Intramuscular injection of clostridial vaccines causes significant damage to muscle so that blackleg vaccines are recommended to administer subcutaneously (under the skin) in the neck area. Injection in this area prevents injection site damage. Many clostridial vaccines require revaccination 4 to 6 week following the initial treatment (Compendium of BeefProducts,1993).Thesewholeformalizedculturevaccinesaresuccessful inprotectionoftheanimals. Immunity of C . chauvoei is considered to be mainly somatic and flagellar antigensbeingthemostwidelystudiedforthevaccinedevelopment.Since blacklegisconsideredanenzooticdisease,theincorporationoflocalstrains with high immunoprotective capacity in vaccine formulations is encouraged (ChandlerandHamilton,1975;Tamura etal .,1984;Matter etal .,2001). The commercial vaccines must meet strict legal requirements stated by current pharmacopeia and manufacturing regulations. Current standards (BritishPharmacopeia(Veterinary)1985)forvaccinescontaining C.chauvoei require a potency test based on a challenge assay in guineapigs. Most veterinary clostridial vaccines are multi component, requiring assays in rabbitstotestthepotencyofcomponentsotherthan C.chauvoei .Potency tests for vaccines against the exotoxin producing species of clostridia are basedonmeasuringtheantitoxicresponseinducedbythevaccineinrabbits.

11

The individual antitoxins produced by the rabbits are assayed in mice by comparing the specific toxin neutralizing activity of the test sera with the neutralizingactivityofreferenceseraofdefinedpotency.Asimmunityto C. chauvoei isgenerallyconsideredtobeantibacterialratherthanantitoxic,an assay of the type used to measure the response to an exotoxin is inappropriate.Asaresult,potencytestsforvaccinescontaining C.chauvoei antigens are based on a challenge assay in guineapigs (Crichton et al ., 1990;Morris,2005).

For the production of C. chauvoei vaccine, it is essential that a well characterizedseedstraincapableofyieldingsafeandimmunogenicvaccine that meets the requirements as laid down in the British Pharmacopoeia (Veterinary), 1985, have been used. Organisms which grow during the course of infection in animals possess full antigenic components. This full antigenic pattern has been maintained as nearly as possible in any seed straintobeusedforproductionofvaccine.Repeatedpassageoforganisms in artificial medium results in loss of both virulence and antigenicity so keeping cultures within three passages in artificial media from the original seed obtained from infected cattle, sheep or guinea pigs is necessary. For thisreason,alargestockoffreezedriedseedisprepared.Productionof C. chauvoei vaccine is required to be based on seedlot systems. It is crucial thattheseedlotsaresubjectedtoafullrangeofcontroltests,i.e.identity, safetyandpotency,priortouseinvaccineproduction.

12

1.5 VirulenceFactorsof C.chauvoei 1.5.1 Flagella Flagella are best known for their role in bacterial motility. In certain pathogenic bacteria, flagella also appear to play an important role in the interactionoftheparasitewithitsanimalhost.Manystudiesontheflagella of Vibrio cholerae (Attride and Rowley, 1983), Salmonella typhimurium (Carsiotis etal .,1984), Pseudomonasaeruginosa (Montie etal .,1982)and Campylobacterjejuni (Morooka etal .,1995)suggestedthattheflagellamay beimportantasavirulencefactorinthepathogenesisofinfectioncausedby theseorganisms.Moreover,thestudiesoftheflagellaof V. cholerae (Yancey et al ., 1979) and P . aeruginosa (Montie et al ., 1987) suggest that flagella mayelicitprotectiveantibodiesagainsttherespectiveinfections. C. chauvoei is peritrichously flagellated. Moussa (1959) reported that C. chauvoei possessedasingleOantigen,andcouldbedividedintotwogroups based on two Hantigens which were distinct from those of Clostridium septicum . Overthepastfewyears,ithasbeenshownthattheflagellaof C.chauvoei areimportantasaprotectiveantigenflagellaandithasbeenconsideredas one of the protective antigens contained in the vaccine against blackleg (Tamura etal .,1984). 1.5.2 Toxins C.chauvoeiproduces atleastfivesolubleantigens(toxins)thatincludean oxygenstablehemolysin(alpha),aDnase(beta),ahyaluronidase(gamma),

13

an oxygen labile hemolysin (delta) and a neuroaminidase (Cortinas et al ., 1999). These toxins and other factors have been associated with pathogenicityof C. chauvoei. 1.5.2.1 Hemolysin Bacteriaareknowntoproducehemolysin,whichmaylyseerythrocytesfrom various species of animals. Studies have shown that hemolysinproducing bacteria are more virulent to animals than hemolysin lacking bacteria (Cavalieri and Snyder, 1982; Smith and Linggood, 1971). It is well known that C. chauvoei produces hemolysin in the culture medium (Bruner and Gillespie,1966).Thehemolysinissuspectedasoneofthevirulencefactors of C. chauvoei infection in animals. Some of the biological characteristics were reported by Moussa (1958) and Kerrin (1934) that hemolysin of C. chauvoei wasfilterable,heatlabile,activelyantigenicandcanbeprecipitated byammoniumsulfate.Hang’ombe etal .(2006)reportedthemolecularmass ofhemolysin,determinedbySDSPAGE,wasfoundtobeapproximately27 kDa. Hemolysis produced by the delta toxin occurs more rapidly than that producedbythealphatoxin(Hatheway,1990). 1.5.2.2 Betatoxin ThebetatoxinfromthisorganismisaDNase.PrincewillandOakley(1976) foundthatthebetatoxinisheatstable,activatedorinhibitedbymetalions, inhibited by chelating agents, and having precipitability with ammonium sulfate. The betatoxin may be responsible for degenaration of muscle cell nuclei(Ramachandran,1969). To

14

1.5.2.3 Gammatoxin The gammatoxin of C. chauvoei is a hyaluronidase, an enzyme that hydrolyzes glycosidic bonds between Nacetylglucosamine and glucuronic acid residues of hyaluronic acid which is the base substance in connective tissue. Bacterial hyaluronidases are produced by a number of pathogenic Grampositivebacteriathatinitiateinfectionsattheskinormucosalsurfaces. Grampositiveorganismscapableofproducinghyaluronidaseincludevarious species of Streptococcus , Staphylococcus , Peptostreptococcus , Propionibacterium , Streptomyces and Clostridium .Amongthe staphylococci , hyaluronidase production has been shown for pathogenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus hyicus subsp. hyicus (Skalka, 1985).Most,ifnotall,oftheseGrampositivegeneracapableofelaborating hyaluronidase are able to cause infections initiated at a mucosal or skin surface of either humans or animals. Many pathogenic bacteria able to establish infections at the mucosal or skin surface produce the enzyme hyaluronidase. Since hyaluronate is a major constituent of the ground substance of most connective tissues, particularly the skin, hyaluronidase may be an essential component in enabling the spread of the pathogens fromaninitialsiteofinfection(Hynes,andWalton,1999)Theroleplayedby thistoxininthepathogenesisofblacklegisalsoundefined. 1.5.2.4 Neuraminidase The neuraminidase of C. chauvoei removes sialic acid residues from glycoconjugates on cell walls of eucaryotic cells resulting in distruptions of theintercellularmatrix.ThemolecularweightofC.chauvoei neuraminidase is65kDaanditisreportedthatnativeenzymeexistasadimericproteinas 135 kDa protein (Useh et al ., 2006). It is reported that C. chauvoei

15

neuraminidase has the capacity to hydrolyse red blood cells and it could accountforthehypovolemiaobservedinblackleg(Singh etal .,1993;Useh etal .,2006). 1.6 Proteomics Proteomics is the study of the proteome, the protein complement of the genome. The terms “proteomics” and “proteome” were coined by Marc Wilkinsandcolleaguesin1995,mirrortheterms“genomics”and“genome” andproteomicswasdefinedasthelargescalecharacterizationoftheentire proteincomplementofacellline,tissue,ororganism. Theproteomics,nowevokesnotonlyalltheproteinsinanygivencell,but also the set of all different proteins, the interactions between them, the structural description of proteins and their higherorder complexes (Tyers and Mann, 2003). Different proteins include not only the primary polypeptidescreatedbytheindividualgenes,butalsoallthecoandpost translational modifications of a protein. Different proteins can occur in differentcelltypesanddifferentsubcellularcompartmentsandtherecanbe differencesinproteincompositionandconcentrationforadistinctcelltypeat differentlifestagesorduringanyfunctionalprocesstakingplaceinthecell. Therefore,itisclearthattheproteomeisfarmorecomplexthanthegenome (Gauss etal .,1999).Theterminusgenomeis“usedtorefertoallthegenes carriedbyasinglegamete”(KingandStansfield,1990)and,itisstaticsince it represents the blueprint for all cellular properties that a cell is able to develop. In contrast, the proteome is highly dynamic and much more complex than the genome. It differs from one cell type to another qualitativelyaswellasquantitatively,and,moreover,dependsonthecourse oftime(Gauss etal .,1999).

16

1.6.1 WhyProteomics? Analyzinggeneexpressiononthetranscriptlevelandextrapolatingthatdata to the protein level is not sufficient. There are a number of reasons why genesequenceinformationdoesnotprovideacompleteprofileofaprotein’s abundanceoritsfinalstructureandstateofactivity(Banks etal .,2000;Celis etal .,2000). Verification of a gene product by proteomic methods is an important first step in “annotating the genome.” Proteins are frequently the functional moleculesand,therefore,theyreflectdifferencesingeneexpression.Genes may be present, they may be mutated, but they are not necessarily transcribed. Some messages are transcribed but not translated, and the numberofmRNAcopiesdoesnotnecessarilyreflectthenumberoffunctional proteinmolecules(AndersonandSeilhamer,1997).Inaddition, proteomics addresses problems that cannot be approached by DNA analysis, namely, relative abundance of the protein product, posttranslational modification, subcellular localization, turnover, interaction with other proteins as well as functionalaspects(Celis etal .,2000). It is therefore not surprising that proteome analysis has become a key enablingtechnologyintheemergingscienceofsystemsbiology.Proteomics maybedefinedasthedirectqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofthefull complementofproteinspresentinanorganism,tissue,orcellunderagiven set of physiological or environmental conditions. The advantage of proteomics lies in the ability to directly examine the biomolecules and assemblies of biomolecules that are most responsible for the function of biologicalsystems.

17

1.6.2 ProteomicTool Theproteomictechnologyiscomplex,andcomprisesaplethoraofstateof the art techniques to resolve (high resolution twodimensional gels), quantitate (phosphorimager, special scanners), identify and characterize proteins (microsequencing, mass spectrometry), as well as to store (two dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D PAGE) databases; http://biobase/dk/cgibin/celis;http://expasy.hcuge.ch/ sprot/sprottop.html) communicate and interlink protein and DNA sequence and mapping information(bioinformatics)(Celis etal .,1998;Dunn,2000;Humpheryand Smith,1997;Huber,1997). Formanyyears,highresolution2DPAGEhasbeenthetechniqueofchoice foranalyzingtheproteincompositionofcells,tissuesandfluids,aswellas forstudyingchangesinglobalpatternsofgeneexpressionelicitedbyawide array of effectors (Dunn, 2000; Celis, 1984). The technique, which was originally described by O'Farrell (O'Farrell, 1975) and Klose (Klose, 1975), separatesproteinsbothintermsoftheirisoelectricpoint(pI)andmolecular weightandprovideshighresolutionforproteinanalysis. 1.6.3 StepsinProteomeWork

1.6.3.1 IsoelectricFocusingandImmobilizedpHGradient Isoelectric focusing (IEF) is an electrophoretic method which separates proteinsaccordingtotheirisoelectricpoints(pI)(O'Farrell,1975).Itmakes useofthepropertyofproteinsthattheirnetchargesaredeterminedbythe pHoftheirlocalenvironments.Proteinscarrynegative,positiveorzeronet charge,dependingontheirsurroundingpHlevel.Thenetchargeofaprotein

18

isthesumofallthepositiveandnegativechargesofRgroups(aminoacid side chains) and amino and carboxyltermini. Isoelectric point (pI) is the specificpHwherethenetchargeofaproteiniszero.Proteinsarepositively charged with pH values below their pI and negativelycharged with pH values above their pI. Proteins show considerable variation in isoelectric points,butpIvaluesusuallyfallintherangeofpH312.Ifthenetchargeof a protein is plotted versus the pH of its environment, the resulting curve intersectsthexaxisatitspI. ThepresenceofthepHgradientisessentialtotheIEFmethod.InthepH gradient,proteinsmovetowardtheelectrodewiththeoppositechargeand theproteinwilleitherpickuporloseprotons.Asitdoes,itsnetchargeand mobility will decrease and the protein slow down. Migration stops when protein will arrive at the point in the pH gradient equaling its pI. When a proteindiffusesawayfromitspI,itsuddenlygainschargeandmovesback toitspIposition.Thisiscalled“focusing”effectofIEF,whichconcentrates proteins at their pIs and permits proteins to be separated on the basis of verysmallchargedifferences. For many years the 2D PAGE technology relied on the use of carrier ampholytes (amphoteric compounds) to establish the pH gradient. Carrier ampholytes are small, soluble amphoteric molecules with a high buffering capacity near their pI. Carrier ampholytes are composed of hundreds of individual polymeric molecules with their pIs spanning a specific pH range. However, this technique has proven to be difficult because of the lack of reproducibility created by uncontrollable variations in the batches of ampholytesusedtogeneratethepHgradients.Lately,withtheintroduction ofimmobilizedpHgradients(IPGs)(Bjellqvist etal .,1982;Görg etal .,2000), whichareintegralpartofthepolyacrylamidematrix,ithasbeenpossibleto

19

obtainfocusingpatternsthatcanbeeasilyreproduced.IPGsavoidsomeof theproblemsassociatedwithcarrierampholytessuchascathodicdriftand endosmosis,allowahigherloadingcapacityformicropreparative runs,and provide increased charge resolution when narrow pH gradients (0.03 pH unit/cm)areused(Görg etal .,2000,Corthals,2000). Afterthefirstdimensioniscompleted,theseconddimensionisachievedon the base of protein size using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis(SDSPAGE). 1.6.3.2 ProteinDetectionandImageAnalysis Protein detection and visualization following 2 Dimensional Electrophoresis (2DE) are carried out using nonfluorescent stains such as Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB); although this method is quick and easy and also compatiblewithMSanalysis,ithaslimitedsensitivity(200500ngofprotein perspot).Alternatively,silverstainingis100timesmoresensitivethanCBB and can detect up to 0.1 ng of protein per spot (Rabilloud, 1999). Fluorescentstainsbasedonuseoffluorescentcompoundareknowntohave much larger linear dynamic range and are, therefore, more sensitive than nonfluorescentdetectionmethods.

1.6.3.3 MassSpectrometryAnalysis Methods of protein identification have included immunoblotting, Edman peptide sequencing, amino acid composition and more recently the use of massspectrometry.Thelattertechnique,whichreliesonthecomparisonof peptide mass fingerprints, is fast and requires only picomol amounts of proteins(Celis etal. ,2000).

20

The basic principle of mass spectrometry (MS) is to generate ions from sampleofacompound,toseparatetheseionsbytheirmasstochargeratio (m/z)andtodetectthemqualitativelyandquantitativelybytheirrespective m/z and abundance. Mass spectrometers can be divided into three fundamental parts, namely the ionization source, the analyzer, and the detector.Thesamplehastobeintroducedintotheionizationsourceofthe instrument. Once inside the ionization source, the sample molecules are ionized,becauseionsareeasiertomanipulatethanneutralmolecules.These ionsareextractedintotheanalyzerregionofthemassspectrometerwhere theyareseparatedaccordingto their mass(m)tocharge(z)ratios(m/z). Althoughtherearefewavailabletechniques,atimeofflight(TOF)isoneof the simplest mass analyzer. It measures the m/z ratio of an ion by determiningthetimerequiredforittotransversethelengthofaflighttube. From the MS/MS scan, after subtracting the backgrounds, amino acid sequenceinformationforthepeptideisobtainedwiththeaidofsoftware. TheinformationobtainedisthenusedtosearchDNAandproteindatabases (SWISSPROT,FASTA;MOWSE,ProFound,PepFrag,PepSea,andsoon).

¢

¡ Immunoproteomics ofPathogenicBacteria Immunoproteomics could be defined as the combination of any proteomic technologywithanimmunologicaldatapresentation.Itsdevelopmentisvital in an age where it is increasingly becoming urgent to identify disease biomarkers and pathogenic target antigens for the development of new drugs and vaccines (Steel et al ., 2005). Among the current proteomic techniques available, 2DE has often been chosen as the working tool in immunoproteomic applications in combination with Western blot (Klade, 2002).

21

Immunoproteomics takes advantage of the fact that higher organisms contain a highly sophisticated immune system that has the ability to distinguish ‘normal’ (self) from ‘abnormal’ (nonself) proteins. Proteins that areregardedasnonselfbytheimmunesystemarecalledantigens(antibody generators) and can be defined as proteinsthat bind to immune receptors and elicit an immune response (Alberts et al ., 2002). For diagnostic purposes, it is important that circulating antibodies reflect a molecular imprintofthoseantigens.Thekeyissueinimmunoproteomicsistovisualize what is seen by the immune system during the diseases (Tjalsma et al. , 2007). Vaccinationofindividualshasbeenpracticedformanyyearsandhasbeen one of the most effective methods of controlling infectious diseases. Louis Pasteur,whodevelopedthefirstvaccineagainstrabies,establishedin1881 the basic paradigm for vaccine development, which included the isolation, inactivation and injection of the causative microorganism. Unfortunately, even the success of the vaccine production methods and studies, society continues to suffer multibillion dollar economic losses annually due to infectious diseases. One of the reasons for that development of infectious diseasesisthattheantibioticresistancyofthebacteriathatwerepreviously susceptibletothelargearmoryofantibiotics(Hiramatsu etal .,2001;WHO, 2001; Appelbaum, 2002; Walsh, 2003). The other reason is progressive manipulationsandaggressivetreatmentswhichcauseimmunologicaldefense suppressionsanditmakestheinfectiousmoreseriousandmoredifficultto treat.Thelossesoccurinallanimalspeciesaswellasinhumans. According to a report by the WHO, infections by microorganisms are globally responsible more than 15 million deaths each year. In order to further reducetheselosses,themultidisciplinaryapproachestodevelopbetterand safer vaccines are employed. The disciplines include on advances in

22

molecularbiology,chemistry,pharmacy,immunology,genomics,proteomics, and fermentation techniques. In the last decade, a revolution in vaccine designhasemergedfromtheuseofpostgenomictechnologies(Serrutoand Rappuoli,2006;Khan etal .,2006). Allexistingvaccinesarebasedonkilledorliveattenuatedmicroorganismsor subunitvaccines.Theformertwoclassesarebasedonthewholecellsofthe pathogen, while subunit vaccines based on selected antigens and their respectivegenesarerecognizedasthesafesttype,althoughtheirefficacyis lowerthanthosecomprisedofwholeattenuatedcells.Theimportantpointin thedevelopmentofeffectivesubunitvaccinesisthechoiceoftheantigens. For more than 100 years, diverse strategies have been applied to select candidates for subunit vaccine construction. In the beginning of the 20th century, bacterial virulence factors were identified, mainly by biochemical approaches.Inthesecondhalfofthe20thcentury,progressinthefieldof vaccinology was possible owing to application of new recombinant DNA technologies.Anotherstepforwardinmicrobiologyandmedicinetookplace at the end of 20th century in 1995, when the first bacterial genome (Haemophilus influenza ) was sequenced. Presently, the complete genetic informationofapproximately1000bacterialstrainsisavailableaccordingto Genomes Online Database (2009). Development of rapid sequencing methodscombinedwithnovelbioinformaticshasrevolutionizedthestudyof bacterialpathogenesisandfacilitatedthedevelopmentofanewstrategyfor identification of novel antigens, termed “reverse vaccinology”. Proteomics, largescaleanalysisofcellularproteins,isapowerfultoolforstudyingprotein identification,localization,modifications,functionandpossibleinteractionsor complexes they can form. By this time, proteome databases of diverse pathogenic microorganisms including Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Helicobacterpylori , Salmonellaenterica , Bacillusanthracis andmanyothers

23

wereestablished.Muchofinformationaboutimmunogeniccomponentscan bederivedfromimmunoproteomicswhichhasbeensuccessfullyappliedfor thediscoveryofantigensfromvariousbacterialpathogens.Usingproteomics and immunoproteomics as a supporting approach ensures the reduction of thenumberofvaccinecandidates,indicatingthemostabundantandhighly seropositiveproteinsforthefuturestudies(Katarzyna etal. ,2009). 1.7.1 ImmunoproteomicapproachestopathogenicClostridia Species Proteomemapsofsequencedorganismareimportantresearchtoolsforthe authentication of hypothetical proteins, the identification of components of differentcellularproteomefractionsandforyieldinginformationconcerning the occurrence and abundance of proteins. Such proteome maps in the public domain have been generated for many pathogens and are of great value in identifying new virulence factors and the antigens of potential diagnostic and curative value against infections with pathogens. Despite a sudden spurt of activity towards proteomic characterization of bacterial pathogens, for unknown reasons, clostridia have largely been ignored. C. difficile and C .perfringens aretheonlyclostridialspeciesforwhichanalysis ofproteomeandimmunoproteomehasbeencarriedouttosomeextentso (Calabi etal .,2002;Drudy etal .,2004;Pecine etal .,2005).

C.difficile ,anintestinalpathogen,isfrequentlyrecoveredfromthehospital environment. Patients and hospital staff have been implicated as a major sourceofnosocomialacquisition(McFarland etal .,1989).Thereareknown virulencefactorsandmainonesarethetoxinsA(TcdA)andB(TcdB),which are expressed by the bacterium in the gastrointestinal tract. These toxins mediatedestructionoftheintegrityoftheepithelialcellbarrierandinducea

24

variety of physiological effects on intestinal cells (Just & Gerhard, 2004; Poxton et al ., 2001; Voth & Ballard, 2005). The other potential candidate proteinsfortheseactivitiesincludethesurfacelayerproteins(SLPs)(Calabi et al ., 2001), flagella (Tasteyre et al ., 2000), the chaperone GroEL (Hennequin etal .,2001),thefibronectinbindingproteins(Hennequinetal., 2003) and the adhesion protein Cwp66 (Waligora et al ., 2001). Recently, Wright et al., (2008) focused on immunoproteomic study of C. difficile to identifysuchproteinsthatareimmunoreactiveinhumans.Cellwallproteins wereseparatedby2DPAGE,andimmunoreactiveproteinswererevealedby reaction with patient sera. The identity of immunoreactive proteins was established by MS. Fortytwo different proteins were identified in total. All patientserareactedwithatleastonecomponentofthesurfacelayerprotein (SLP), four reacted with both components (high and lowmolecularmass SLPs), and five reacted with one other cell wall protein, suggesting that theseareimmunodominantantigens(Wright etal .,2008).Infurtherstudies, theroleoftheseproteinsaspotentialvaccinecandidatesandtheirrolesin pathogenesisshouldbeinvestigated. C.perfringens isamedicallyimportantclostridialpathogenandanetiological agent,causingseveraldiseasesinhumansandanimals;theformerincludes gas gangrene, food poisoning, necrotizing enterocolitis of infants and enteritis necroticans (MacLennan, 1943; Titball and Rood, 2001). A total of 22surfacelocalizedproteinsand10cellenvelopeproteinswereidentifiedby proteomicanalysisof C. perfringens ATCC13124.Inthestudy,twomedia, CookMeatMedia(CMM)andtryptoseyeastextractglucosemedium(TYGM), werecompared andgrowthonCMMresultedinoverexpressionofseveral proteins of which 11 most prominent ones have been identified. Choloylglycine hydrolase family protein (SP2), glutamate synthase (SP3), sucrose6phosphate dehydrogenase (SP4), and ornithine

25

carbamoyltransferase (SP15) were found to be immunogenic cell surface proteinsasrevealedbytheWesternblotanalysisof2DEseparatedsurface proteins. Ornithine carbamoyltransferase identified in this study can be putative vaccine candidates as it was overexpressed in CMM grown cells. Thelatterisimmunogenic,andtheirhomologsinotherpathogenicbacteria have been shown to be immunogenic/virulence factor. In addition phosphoglycerate kinase, NacetylmuramoylLalanine amidase, and translation elongation factor Tu and EFG could also be putative vaccine candidates as they were abundant on the cell surface fraction and their homologsinotherGrampositivepathogenicbacteriahavebeenshowntobe immunogenic/virulencedeterminants(Alam etal .,2009).

1.8 AimandScopeofthepresentstudy Theaimofthepresentstudywastocharacterizeimmunogenicproteinsof C. chauvoei andinvestigatenovelimmunogenicproteinsbyusing1DEand2 DEfollowedbyimmunoblottechniquesandMALDITOFMSanalysis.Inorder tocharacterizetheseproteins,theoptimumgrowthmediumcompositionand corresponding growth curve in this medium was determined. After immunizationofthemicewiththeinactivatedwholecellcultureinoptimized growthmedia,serawereobtainedfortheevaluationofantibodyresponse. Thefirstimmunoproteomemapof C.chauvoei wasconstructedwiththeaim of providing further insight into the immunogenicity of this pathogen and improvementofnewvaccines.

26

CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 BacterialStrainsandMaintenance The strain of C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 which was isolated from blackleg sheep and C. chauvoei 20 which was obtained from Pendik Veterinary Institute were used in this study. The strains were kindly provided for this studybyDr.ErkanÖzcengiz(VBRVaccineRes.Co.,Ankara).Forlongterm maintenance, the bacteria grown in Modified Clostridia Medium, M12V, in ananearobicjar(appendixA)for24hwerepreservedin20%glycerol,at 80°C. 2.2 CultureMedia The composition and the preparation of the culture media are given in AppendixA. 2.3 BuffersandSolutions Buffers,solutions,theircompositionandpreparationarelistedinAppendixB.

27

2.4 ChemicalsandEnzymes ThechemicalsandtheirsuppliersarelistedinAppendixC. 2.5 CultureConditions C.chauvoei strainswereculturedinourimprovedClostridialmedium,M12 V.Theorganismwasincubatedasprecultureandgrownovernightat37°C inananaerobicjar.Then,itwasinoculatedtosubculturefor16hunderthe sameconditions.Thedayafter,theorganismwasinoculatedfreshlytoa2L fermentor (Sartorius BBI Systems, Melshungen, Germany) with 1.5 L of culturemediumwhichwasautoclavedat121°Cfor30min.TheBsolution ofthemediumandvitaminsolutionwerepassedthroughfilters(0.2)µmfor sterilizationandaddedshortlybeforetheinoculation.Thepercentageofthe inoculum was 1% (v/v). Culture was incubated at 37°C with free pH evolutionafteradjustedtopH7.5byusing2.5MNaOH.pHwasobserved fromthedisplayscreenofthefermentor.Theanaerobicconditionsrequired for growth of C. chauvoei was met by nitrogen tubes. Culture growth was monitored by optical density determinations at 630 nm (OD 630 ) with spectrophotometer(Hitachi,Japan). 2.6 HemolyticAssay C. chauvoei strains were cultured in the clostridia medium, M12V in the fermentor. Starting from the growth, necessary amount of culture sample wastakenforbothhemolyticassayandopticaldensityobservationatevery twohourtilltheendofthesecondday.Aftereachsampling,theculturewas centrifuged at 9000 rpm at 4°C for 20 minutes and the supernatant was

28

stored at 4°C. At the end of culturing in the fermentor, all samples were usedinhemolysintest. Amousewasbledforthetest.Thebloodwastakento0.1ml%3.8citrate solutiontopreventcoagulationoftheblood.Thebloodsamplewaswashed 2 times with phosphatebuffered saline (PBS; 10 mM NaHPO4 [pH 7.2], 5 mMKCl,145mMNaCl,0.1%glucose)bycentrifugationat3000rpmfor5 minutes at room temperature. Then, 0.1 ml of blood pellet was taken and dilutedin10mlPBS,whichbecame1%erythrocytesolution.

HemolyticassaytestwasperformedasdescribedbyBallard etal., 1991and Hang’ombe et al., 2006 with slight modifications. The sample was diluted withPBSintoafinalvolumeof200µlinthefirsttube,andtotheremaining tubes, 100 µl of PBS was added. Serial 1:2 dilutions were performed by removing 100 µl of the first dilution, adding it to 100 µl of PBS in a subsequent tube, and mixing thoroughly. This was repeated until 7 to 8 dilutions had been made. To each tube, 100 µl of an erythrocyte solution was added, and the tubes were incubated at 37°C for 2 h and then centrifugedat1000rpmfor5minatroomtemperature.Theabsorbanceof thesupernatantwasmeasuredat595nm.PBSand1%TritonX100solution were used as control. In PBS, there have to be no hemolytic activity, so supernatantofthistubewasusedasblank.Ontheotherhand,1%Triton X100has100%hemolyticactivitiesinmouseerythrocytes. Results were evaluated as positive and negative according to blank and the highest dilution that gave positive value accepted as hemolytic unit (HU) of the sample.

29

2.7 PreparationsofProteinSamplesfor1DE,2DEandELISA Studies 2.7.1 WholeCultureLysate C.chauvoei strainswereculturedinM12Vmedium.Cultureswerediluted 1:1inrehydrationbuffer.Sampleswerevortexed5minandtheywereput into ice. These were repeated for 3 times. The protein concentration was measuredandproteinsampleswerestoredat20°C.Theseproteinsamples wereusedin1DESDSPAGEstudies.

2.7.2 Sonication Sonication was performed as described by Mattar et al ., 2001 with slight modifications. C. chauvoei was cultured in M12V medium. Cultures were centrifugedat9000rpmat4°Cfor20minandwashedtwicewithphosphate salinebuffer(PBS).ThenthecellsweredisruptedusingaVibraCellsonicator (ColeParmer Ultrasonic Proccessor,USA), for 4 min at 20 kHz in a discontinuous way (50% duty cycles) while being cooled in an icewater bath. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 13000 rpm for 20 min. The protein concentration was measured and protein samples were storedat20°C.TheseproteinsampleswereusedinELISAstudies. 2.7.3 WholeCellExtraction

ProteinextractionwasperformedasdescribedbyAltındi etal .,2008with slightmodifications.Forthepreparationofwholecelllysates,thecellswere collectedandsuspendedincoldTEbufferandspinnedat9000rpmfor20 min at 4°C in a centrifuge. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml 0.04 M

30

lysosyme in TE buffer and incubated at 37°C at water bath for 35 min, followedbyacentrifugationat13000rpmfor20minat4°C.Thepelletwas solubilized in 8M urea, vortexed at 4°C for 30 min. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 23000 rpm for 1 h at 4°C. The protein concentration was measured by using modified Bradford method. These proteinsampleswereusedin2DESDSPAGEstudies. 2.8 ProteinEstimation Todeterminetotalproteinconcentrations,theBradfordassaydescribedby RamagliandRodrigez(1985)wasused.TheBradfordassay,acolorimetric proteinassay,isbasedonanabsorbanceshiftinthedyeCoomassiewhen the previously red form coomassie reagent changes and stabilizes into coomassiebluebythebindingofprotein.1mg/mlBovineSerumAlbumin (BSA)proteinisusedtopreparecalibration curves.Bradfordstockreagent was diluted 1:5 volume and filtered by using Whatman No.1 filter paper. Standards and samples were prepared as shown in Table 2 in duplicate. Blankwaspreparedbyusingbufferthatproteinsolubilizesin.Spectroscopic readings were done at 595 nm and calibration curve of absorbance versus proteinconcentrationinmicrogramwasdrawn.

31

Table2.PreparationofStandardsforBradfordAssay

BSA dH 2O Bradford1X

2µl 98µl 900µl

4µl 96µl 900µl

6µl 94µl 900µl

8µl 92µl 900µl

10µl 90µl 900µl

Sample dH 2O Bradford

2µl 98µl 900µl

Blank dH 2O Bradford

2µl 98µl 900µl

For 2DE studies, Bradford assay was slightly different. While extracted proteins were solubilized in 8 M urea, calibration curve was prepared by usingamixtureofBSAand8Mureain1:1ratioandthe8Mureawasused asblank.

32

2.9 1DgelElectrophoresisandWesternBlotting A vertical mini electrophoresis apparatus was used for SDSPAGE. SDS PolyacrylamidegelwaspreparedasshowninTable3.Proteinstobeloaded werediluted3:1ratioina4XLaemmlisamplebufferandputintoheatblock at 90°C for 1 min. Samples were loaded 20 µg/well tothegelandrunin running buffer at 16 mA until loading dye reaches end of the gel. Pre stainingproteinmarker(Fermentas)wasloaded3µltoawell. Table3.SDSPolyacrylamideGelPreparation

StackingGel SeparatingGel

0.125MTris,pH 0.375MTris,pH 6.8 8.8

Monomerconcentration 4.5% 12%

Acrylamide/bis 1.3ml 4ml dH 2O 6.1ml 3.35ml

1.5MTrisHCl,pH8.8 2.5ml

0.5MTrisHCl,pH6.8 2.5ml

10%(w/v)SDS 100 µl 100 µl

10% Ammoniumpersulphate 50 µl 50 µl (fresh) 10 µl 5 µl TEMED

TOTALMONOMER 10ml 10ml

33

SDSPAGEGelswerestainedeitherbyCoomassieBlueG250(Neuhoff etal ., 1988) or Silver Staining method (Switzer et al ., 1979). For coomassie staining, the gel was removed from the cassette and placed into a tray containingfixingsolution.Thegelwassoakedinthissolutionatleast1hour. Then, the gel was soaked in appropriate volume of freshly prepared CoomassieBlueG250stainafterelectrophoresis.Thegelwasputin200ml CCB dye solution then 50 ml methanol wasadded andthe gel was kept in thissolutionfor24to48h.ThegelwaswashedwithdH 2Ountilproteinspots areclearlyvisible. Forsilverstaining,thegelwasremovedfromthecassetteandplacedintoa traycontainingappropriatevolumeoffixingsolution.Thegelwassoakedin thissolutionatleast1h.Then,thefixativesolutionwasdiscardedandthe gel was washed in 50% ethanol for 20 min. This step was repeated at 3 times.Afterwashingstep,enoughvolumeofthepretreatmentsolutionwas addedandgentlyrotatedfor1min.Thegelwaswashedtwice,20seach time in distilled water. Then, impregnate solution was added and gel was shakedfor20min.Thegelwaswashedtwice,20seachtimeindistilled water.Thegelwasrinsedshortlywiththedevelopingsolution.Thereaction was terminated with stop solution as soon as the desired intensity of the bandswasreached.ThesolutionsarelistedintheAppendixB. Western blotting was performed as described by Towbin et al ., 1979 with slightmodifications.Whatman(3D)papersandnitrocellulosesheet(Biorad) cutto thesizeofSDSPAGEgelwereprewetintransferbufferandplaced onto semidry gel electrophoresis apparatus (Cleaver Scientific, England). 6 whatman papers were put onto bottom. Then, nitrocellulose membrane sheet was put and nonstained gel was placed onto it. Finally, 6 whatman papers were the upper side. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose

34

membrane sheet at 1.5 µA / cm 2 for 1.5 h. The nitrocellulose sheet was incubated2hat37C°in10%skimmilkforblockingpurposestoprevent nonspecific binding of serum. After blocking, nitrocellulose sheet was washed 3 times in TBS with 0.5% Tween20 (TTBS). Membrane was then incubated for 1 h at room temperature in Mouse antiC. chauvoei serum diluted(1:200)in5%skimmilkwithconstantshaking.Afterthisincubation, membranewaswashed3times(5min)inTTBSandincubated1hatroom temperature with Alkaline Phosphadase conjugated antimouse IgG (Sigma St. Louis, MO, USA) which is diluted (1:15000) in 5% skim milk. Then, membranewaswashed3times(5min)inTBSsolution.BioradAPSubstrate kit was used for detection of proteins colorimetrically. Membrane was incubated in substrate solution prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions1040minuntilproteinbandsarevisible.Colordevelopmentwas stoppedwithdH 2O. 2.10 Preparationof C.chauvoei Vaccines Amonovalentvaccinecontainedtheformalintreatedwholecultureofboth C. chauvoei strainswereprepared. C.chauvoei strainswereculturedin2L fermentor as mentioned before and 400 ml culture samples were taken inactivatedbyaddingformaldehydeinapercentageof%0.4andincubated at37°Cforaweek.Inactivityandsterilitytestswereappliedbyinoculation of inactive cultures to the Thioglycolate medium (BD), Nutrient Broth medium(NB)andNutrientAgarmedium(NA)for3days.Nogrowthmeant that the cultures were sterile and inactivated. Then, formalin inactivated wholecultureswereconcentratedabout20timesbyusing10kDacassette incrossflowapparatus(Sartorious,Germany).Theseconcentratedcultures wereadsorbedaluminiumhydroxidegel(alhydrogel)asadjuvantinacertain ratios.Vaccineswerestoredat4°C.

35

2.11 ImmunizationforELISAandImmunoblotAnalysis Five,1820gBALB/cmicewereimmunizedtwicesubcutaneouslywith0.5ml of prepared vaccines at 2week intervals. Two weeks after the final immunization, all mice were bled and blood samples were collected. These blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min and sera were collected, pooled and stored at 20°C. These sera were used inELISA and immunoblotanalysis. 2.12 ELISA ELISAs were performed in 96well microELISA plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA,USA).WellsofELISAplateswerecoatedovernightat4°Cwith200µl perwellofsonicatedproteinsataconcentrationof20µgml 1inbicarbonate bufferpH9.6.Thewellswerewashed3timeswithsalinecontaining0.05% Tween20,andthen100µlofserumwasseriallydilutedwithPBScontaining 2%fetalcalfserumand0.05%Tween20,startingfrom1:50.Theserawere allowed to incubate for 2 h at room temperature. After being washed, the wells were incubated with 100 µl Alkaline Phosphatase conjugated anti mouse IGg (1:1000 dilution in same diluent as mouse sera) (Sigma St. Louis,MO,USA)for2hatroomtemperature.Thewellswerewashedand incubatedwith100µlofsubstratesolutionkit(Biorad)for30minatroom temperature in the dark and color development was terminated with 50 µl 1MNaOHsolution.Theopticaldensity(OD)ofeachwellwasobservedwith microplatereader(Rayto,Germany)at490nm.Negativereferenceserum ofmousewasusedasareactivitycontrol.

36

2.13 2DPAGEand2DEWesternBlotting IPGstripswerepassivelyrehydratedbyapplying380µlofrehydrationbuffer (8M urea, 2M thiourea, 1% w/v CHAPS, 20 mm DTT and 0.5% v/v ampholyte 310) containing 400 µg protein sample for 15 h . IEF was performedwithcommerciallyavailableIPGstrips(17cm,pH3–10,BioRad) andtheProteanIEFCell(BioRad,USA).Rehydratedstripsweretakentothe IEFprocess.Stripswerecoveredwithglycerolandwetfilterpaperswereput into the IEF chamber and these papers were changed atleast2timesto preventthedryingofthegel.ThefollowingvoltageprofilewasusedforIEF: 5h50V;5h70V;1h100V;1h300V;1h600V;2h1000V;2h3000V; 2h5000Vfollowedbyalinearincreaseto8000V.Thefinalphaseof8000V wasterminatedafter50000Vh.TheIPGstripswereequilibratedfor30min each in 5mL of solution 1 (6M urea, 50mM TrisHCl (pH 8.8), 30% v/v glycerin,2%w/vSDS,50mgDTT)andthenin5mLofsolution2(6Murea, 50mM TrisHCl (pH 8.8), 30% v/v glycerin, 2% w/v SDS, 225mg iodacetamide. In the first equilibration step, DTT (1%) is added to the equilibrationbufferforproperunfoldingofproteins,andiodoacetamide(4%) during the second step to remove excess DTT held responsible for "point streaking" during silver staining (Gorg et al ., 2004). The isolated proteins were separated in 12% acrylamide/bisacrylamide gels with a BioRad Cell system (BioRad,USA),applyingapproximately25mAper gel.Tovisualize theseparatedproteins,eachgelwasstainedwithcolloidalCoomassieblue (Neuhoff etal .,1988).TheprocedureusedforWesternblottingof2DEgels wasthesameasthatusedfor1DEWesternblotting.

37

2.14 Dotblot

TheimmunoreactivityofeachspotthatgavepositivesignalinWesternblot analysiswasverifiedthroughtheirexcisionfrom2DEgelsfollowedbydot blotting.Eachspotwascutbythehelpofatipofmicropipetteandincubated overnightwith200µldestainingsolutionintheVbottomedmicrotiterplates with constant shaking. Spots were tested dublicately. After removing destainingsolution,thespotswerewashedwithdistilledwaterfor10min. 200µl10%SDSwasaddingtoeachwellafterremovingwater andplate was shaked for 10 min. Then, spots were put into the nitrocellulose membrane for transfer. The procedure used for dot blotting after transfer wasthesameasthatusedforWesternblotting.

2.15 Evaluationof2DEData Coomassiestainedgelsweredigitizedbyusingascanner(HPScanjet4070 Photosmartscanner,USA).Spotpatternanalyseswereaccomplishedbyusing the2DEimageanalysissoftwareDelta2Dversion3.4(Decodon,Germany). 2.16 Proteinidentification The identifications were accomplished by mass spectrometry according to established protocols. Briefly, protein spots were excised from stained 2D gels,destainedanddigestedwithtrypsin(Promega,Madison,WI,USA)and for extraction of peptides, the gel pieces were covered with 60 µl 0.1% o trifluoroaceticacidin50%CH 3CNandincubatedfor30minat40 C.Peptide solutions were mixed with an equal volume of saturated αcyano3 hydroxycinnamic acid solution in 50% acetonitrile0.1% trifluoroacetic acid

38

(v/v)andappliedtoasampleplateforMALDITOFMS.Massanalyseswere carriedoutontheProteomeAnalyzer4700(AppliedBiosystems,FosterCity, CA, USA). The three most abundant peptides in each MS spectrum were chosenforMS/MSexperiment.Theresultingsequencedatawereincludedfor thedatabasesearchtoincreasethereliabilityofproteinidentification.Mass accuracywasusuallyinarangebetween10and30ppm.

2.17 DatabaseSearches

The peak lists of each protein spot were analyzed with the aid of “PMF” and “MS/MS Ion Search” engines of MASCOT software (http://www.matrixscience.com/ ). The searches considered oxidation of methionine and modification of cysteine by carbamidomethylation as well aspartialcleavageleavingoneinternalcleavagesite.Oftheresultsgiven by the MASCOT software, those having a probability score value higher than 53 were considered for successful protein identification. The spots weresearchedinNCBIdatabasewiththehelpofMASCOTsoftware.

39

CHAPTER 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 CulturalGrowth The cultural growth optimization was made for the C. chauvoei in a fermentor system. Growth of C. chauvoei was monitored during a time courseof48h.Fermentationwasat37°Cwithanagitationrateof250rpm. Cultures were incubated without pH control after the medium pH was adjustedtopH7.5beforetheinoculationsincethegrowthwasmuchpoorer whenthepHwascontrolled.While C.chauvoei producesaceticandbutyric acids as metabolic end products during growth, the pH of the culture dropped drastically during log growth time until stationary phase and then remainedconstantwithafinalpH4.8and5.0.DecreaseinpHisadisplayof growth due to acidic byproducts released by C. chauvoei . The pH of the medium which is left uncontrolled during fermentor studies was used to follow up bacterial growth in another measure. The relationship between bacterialgrowthanddecreaseinpHisshowninFigure3.

The growth was exponential for about 58 h but its start point was dependentonthelagphasewhichcouldlastfor12hours.Itwasimportant that C. chauvoei cells from a logarithmicphase culture were used for inoculation and it should not be exposed to oxygen before inoculation to

40

fermentor. Maximum growth was attained in late logarithmic phase. The culturewasthenlysed,followedbyalongstationaryphase.

8 3 7 2,5 6 2 5

pH 4 1,5 pH 3 1 Growth

2 (OD630) density Cell 0,5 1 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Time(h)

Figure 3: The course of growth (◊) of C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 and pH change(□).

3.2 HemolysinActivity Hemolysin activity was measured from cellfree supernatants at intervals between 2 and 72 hours. Highest titres were observed at late logarithmic phase corresponding to 10 to 12.5 h of incubation (Figure 4). The activity sharply declined and no hemolytic activity was observed after 48 h which was the late stationary phase. However, as based on the 1DE Western

41

blotting data in Figure 4, we observed hemolysin (27 kDa protein) in all 3 daysinwholeculturelysateof C.chauvoei .Therefore,weconcludedthatthe production ofhemolysinactivityinthe C.chauvoei culturemainlyoccurred during the log phase growth and terminated at the transition from log to stationarygrowthphases,howevertheproteinisnotdegraded,butitonly loosesitsactivityduringthelatestationaryphase.

3 70

2,5 60 50 2 40 Growth 1,5 30 Hemolysin activity 1 20 Cell Density (OD630)

0,5 10 Hemolysin activity (HU)

0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time(h) Figure 4: Growth of C. chauvoei and expression of hemolysin activity as functionaloftime.

42

3.3 AntibodyResponse ToevaluatetheIgGlevelsoftheseraofmiceimmunizedwithC.chauvoei vaccines,ELISAtestswereperformedasmentioninSection2.12.Sonicated cellsofboth C.chauvoei ATCC11957and20strainswereusedascoating antigens and sera collected from animals immunized with experimental vaccines of ATCC 11957 and 20. Each serum was reacted with its own antigen and cross reactivity was also determined. According to the results that are shown in Figure 5, immunized sera had a high titer of IgG. Therefore, it was demonstrated that these sera were appropriate for 1DE and2DEimmunoblottinganalysesofthisstudy.

43

Figure5: IgGlevelsinducedby C.chauvoei strainsasdeterminedbyELISA testswhenmicewereimmunizedwithexperimentalvaccinesofstrainsATCC 11957and20. 3.4 ProteinProfilesin1DEandImmunoblots Before2DEanalyses,the1,2,and3dayswholeculturelysatesamplesof two strains subjected to SDSPAGE and immunoreactivity in Western blotting. The protein profiles, analyzed by one dimensional, Silver stained SDSPAGEgels(Figure6Aand7A)showedhighnumberofproteinbands (2025)thatrangedfrom150to15kDainsize.Theproteinprofilesofthe two C.chauvoei strainsweresimilar.Alsoproteinprofilesoftheculturesof different age were almost the same. In addition, Figure 9 shows protein patternofwholeculturelysatesof C. chauvoei ATCC11957strainatdifferent

44

timesduringculture.Sampleswereloadedinequalvolumes(20µg)toeach well,buttheproteinamountswerenotcalibrated.Therefore,theevaluation of this data was only qualitative. There were not exactly reflecting any significantdifferencesinproteinprofileatdifferenthoursoftheculture. Determination of immunoreactivity of proteins, Western blotting was performed for both strain extracts. Serum that obtained from immunized mice was used. In addition to homolog reactivity, cross reactions between two strains were observed. Figure 6 and 7 show the results of Western blotting by using C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 immunization serum. Figure 8 shows the Western blot analysis result of two strains extracts by using C. chauvoei 20immunizationserum. The46kDaflagellaprotein,knowntobeimmunogenic(Tamuraetal.,1984; Tamura and Tanaka, 1984), verified in our1DE Western blot analyses for both strains. Besides that, 27 kDa hemolysin protein, suspected to be a major virulence factor (Hang’ombe et al ., 2006), also appeared 1DE Westernblotanalysesforbothstrains(Figure6B,7Band8).Moreover,six bands of relative molecular masses of 135, 130, 105,91,70and60kDa wererecognizedbysera.Inpreviousstudies,Matter etal .,(2001)showed that 130, 91 and 72 kDa proteins of C. chauvoei 10092, 8, 5078 and 17 strainswereimmunogenic.Wehavealsofoundimmonogenicproteinswith similarsizesin C.chauvoei ATCC11957and20strainsinourWesternblot analyses.Theseproteinsshouldfurtherbeidentifiedtoclarifytheirfunctions inpathogenicityof Clostridiumchauvoei strains.

45

4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1

250 250 150 135 kDa 100 75 130 kDa 130 105 kDa 95 50 91 kDa

70 kDa 72 37 60 kDa

55 46kDa

flagellin 25

20 36 27kDa

hemolysin

28 15

AB

Figure 6: Silverstained 1DE SDSPAGE gel of whole culture lysate of C. chauvoei ATCC11957(A)andWesternblotanalysisofwholeculturelysates of C.chauvoei ATCC11957byusingserumobtainedfrommiceimmunized with C. chauvoei ATCC 119571 day grown formalin inactivated whole cell vaccine(B).ForAandB;thelane1representedtheprestainedmarkerand thelanes2to4represented1,2,and3daysculturesof C.chauvoei ATCC 11957,respectively.

46

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

250 250 135 kDa 130 130 kDa 130 100 105 kDa 100 70 91 kDa 70 70 kDa

55 60 kDa 55

46 kDa 35 flagellin 35

27 27kDa 27 flagellin

15 15

A B

Figure 7: Silverstained 1DE SDSPAGE gel of whole culture lysate of C. chauvoei 20 (A) and Western blot analysis of whole culture lysate of C. chauvoei 20byusingserumobtainedfrommiceimmunizedwithC.chauvoei ATCC119571daygrownformalininactivatedculturevaccine(B).ForAand B; the lane 1 represented the prestained marker and the lanes 2 to 4 represented1,2,and3daysculturesofC.chauvoei20,respectively.

47

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

250 135 kDa 130 kDa 130 105 kDa 100 91 kDa 70 kDa 70 60kDa 55 46 kDa flagellin

35

27kDa flagellin 27

15

10

Figure8: Westernblotanalysisofwholeculturelysatesofboth C.chauvoei ATCC 11957 and C. chauvoei 20 by using serum obtained from mice immunizedwithC.chauvoei 201daygrownformalininactivatedwholecell vaccine. The lane 1 represented the prestained marker. The lanes 2 to 4 represented 1, 2, and 3 day cultures of C. chauvoei ATCC 11957, respectively. The lanes 5 to 7 represented 1, 2, and 3 day cultures of C. chauvoei 20,respectively.

48

Marker 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

250 kDa

150 kDa

100 kDa

75 kDa

50 kDa

37 kDa

25 kDa

20 kDa

15 kDa

Figure 9: Silverstained SDSPAGE gel of whole culture lysates of C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 at different times during cultivation. The lanes 17 represented 8, 10, 12, 14, 20, 24, 48 and 72 h whole culture lysates, respectively.

49

3.5 PreparationofProteomeSamplesfor2DE Oneofthemostimportantstepsinthe2DEPAGEtechnologyispreparation of proteome samples. Due to the diversity of proteome samples, the best combinationofstepsandreagentsmustbedeterminedempiricallyforeach sample type. Whole cell extracts of C. chauvoei was obtained by both sonicationmethoddetailedinsection2.7.2andwholecellextractionmethod ofAltındietal (2008)asdetailedinpart2.7.3.Ithasbeendemonstrated,in previousstudies,whichtheproteinprofilesfromsonicatedcellsshowedless bandsin1DESDSPAGEgelsthanwholecell(ChandlerandGulasekharam, 1974).Similarly,betterpatternandbetterfocusingofproteinswereachieved by whole cell extraction method of Altındi et al ., 2008 than sonication method in our study. In this method, the protein samples must be freshly prepared and should be no warmer than 30 oC to avoid carbomylation reaction which causes incorrect results in MALDITOF analysis due to urea (Westermeier et al ., 2002). Even by using this method, there were some focusing problems which appeared as horizontal streaks in 2DE gels. Commonly,2DEexperimentsbeginwithextractionintoasolutioncontaining atleast7Murea.Solubilizationofbacterialsurface(cellwallandmembrane associatedproteins)for2DEischallenging,particularlyinthecaseofGram positivebacteria.Thisisprimarilyduetostrongproteinassociationwiththe cellwallpeptidoglycanandproteinhydrophobicity.Wesolubilizedwholecell proteins for 2DE from the Grampositive pathogen C. chauvoei using 8M urea instead of 7M that is used for gramnegative bacteria. Moreover, centrifugationinhighspeed(23000rpm)for1hwasaddedtotheprotocol to remove insoluble material and also remove possible contamination of DNase, RNase, salt and lipid by the help of urea in the buffer. These contaminationsandinsolublematerialcouldbethereasonofstreaksinthe

50

gels. Therefore, after these optimizations, the protein separation on 2DE gelswashighlygood. 3.6 ProteomeandImmunoproteomeof C.chauvoei Theprofileofwholecellproteinsof C.chauvoeiATCC11957 separatedby2 DEgelbyusingIPGstripsinapHrangefrom310forthefirstdimensionand stainedbyComassieG250isshowninFigure9.Atotalof460proteinspots could be detected on the 2DE gels by the help of Delta2D (Decodon, Germany) image analysing software. 30 of them reacted with polyclonal antibodies against inactivated whole cells of C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 (Figure 11). Among these 30 proteins, 17 (34 spots as a total from the mastergelduplicates)couldbecutandanalyzedbyMALDITOFMSand8of themcouldbecharacterized.Ofthese8spots,4correspondedto C.chauvoei flagellinproteinFliB(C)whichisknowntobemajorimmunogenicprotein.The reason for multiple spots for this protein is likely post translational modificationeventssuchasenzymaticcleavageorchemicalmodifications. It has been reported in the literature that the protective antigens of C. chauvoei areplacedonflagellaandcellwallsofthebacterium(Chandlerand Hamilton,1975).Then,itwasreportedthattheflagellaof C.chauvoei are important for protective immunity in mice in that purified flagella elicit a protective effect, and nonflagellated mutants give 100fold less protective immunitythantheflagellatedparentalstrain(Tamura etal .,1984;Tamura and Tanaka, 1984). On the other hand, Tamura and Tanaka (1984) have demonstratedthatantiflagellarserumpreventsbacterialgrowthintheliver, but not in infected muscle against intramuscular challenge with calcium chloride activated spores in normal mice. They suggested that the anti flagellarserumexertsitseffectinanopsonicfunctionandthatopsonised C.

51

chauvoei is eliminated mainly by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Passive immunizationstudieswereperformedtoseewhetherantigensmaybeuseful as protective immunogens (Tamura and Tanaka, 1984; Chandler, 1975; Menzies and Kernodle, 1996). Micallizzi and Guzman (1997) showed that passive immunization of mice provided by antiflagellar sera elicits 75% protection.Inaddition,Tanaka etal .(1997)reportedthatvaccineswithpoor flagella, which were prepared by dilution or heat treatment of vaccines showedlowerprotectiveeffectsinthemouseprotectiontest.Inconclusion, flagella of C. chauvoei have shown a good performance in terms of protection,soitisahighlyimmunogenicproteinbyitself. Asverifiedbyour results,flagellacanbeagoodvaccinecandidatefor C.chauvoei . On the other hand, 2 protein entries, methionine adenosyltransferase and glucose6phosphateisomerase,matchedwellwiththoseofotherClostridium specieswhichare Clostridium botulinum Bfand Clostridium sp.7_2_43FAA, respectively. 2 proteins which existed in multiple spots corresponded to another bacterial protein, ornithine decarboxylase and this protein matched with Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. Carotovorum WPP14. This protein was detected in two spots on the gel, indicating posttranslational modification. Therefore, these 3 proteins constituted novel immunogenic proteins for C. chauvoei . The characterized proteins were listed in Table 5 andshowninFigure12. Wellseparated master gel presented in Figure 10 constituted first experimental reference proteome map for C. chauvoei from which we obtained first immunoproteomic study for C. chauvoei . In the study, 4 immunogenic proteins were identified in 8 spots of which 3 immunogenic proteinsarenovelfor C.chauvoei .Besides,theidentificationofeveryother immunogenicproteinspotshasnotyetbeenaccomplished.Genomeproject

52

of C.chauvoei hasbeenrecentlycompletedbythegroupofHattoriinTokyo University,howeveritisstillindraftformandnotpublishedyetaccordingto GenomesOnlineDatabase(GOLD)(2009).Untilnow,theproteomestudies of C.chauvoei havebeencarriedoutonNCBI’sgeneralproteindatabases. Thestudiesareunderwaytodefinethewholeproteomeofthe organism, whichwillformabasisforphysiologicalproteomicstudiesofthepathogen whichisplannedtobethenextstepofthecurrentresearch.Forthefuture studies,weareplanningtocomparethetheoreticalproteomemap,whichis derivedfromthegenomesequenceoftheorganism,withtheexperimental results. We will integrate the genetic information with data obtained from proteinstudiesof C.chauvoei inordertoconfirmtheimmunogenicproteins by epitope prediction. Therefore, availability of complete genome of C. chauvoei will provide us more accurate, more reliable, high percentile and fastproteinidentificationinthefuture.

53

Figure10:Areference2DEmap(mastergel)oftotalproteomeof C.chauvoei ATCC11957(pI310).

54

Figure11:Westernblotanalysisofthewholecellproteomeof C.chauvoei ATCC 11957. The immunogenic proteins are identified in circle . The serum was obtained from mice immunized with inactivated whole cells of C. chauvoei ATCC11957.

55

Figure12:Representationofidentifiedimmunogenicproteinsof C. chauvoei ATCC119572DEgel.

56

Table4.Listofidentifiedimmunogenicwholecellproteinsof C.chauvoeiATCC11957

Accession Protein Peptide Protein Multiple ProteinName Species Number ProteinMW pI Count Score spots

Ornithine Pectobacterium decarboxylase carotovorum subsp. gi|227327684 80202,5781 5,58 6 129 2 carotovorum WPP14

Methionine Clostridium gi|168184770 41927,7109 5,8 9 169 1 57 57 adenosyltransferase botulinumBf

Glucose6phosphate Clostridiumsp. isomerase 7_2_43FAA gi|254517666 49930,2383 5,22 12 272 1

Flagellinprotein Clostridium gi|19910959 43518,1289 6,17 22 459 4 FliB(C) chauvoei

The cellular functions, involvement in pathogenesis and the potential as a vaccine candidate of the immunogenic proteins of C. chauvoei identified in thisworkarediscussedinnextsection. 3.7 EvaluationofImmunogenicProteins 3.7.1 MethionineAdenosyltransferase Methionine adenosyltransferases (MATs), also called Sadenosylmethionine synthetase, are the family of enzymes that synthesize the main biological methyl donor, Sadenosylmethionine (AdoMet) from Lmethionine and ATP (Catoni, 1953). Methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) catalyzes the synthesisofsadenosylmethionine(AdoMet),ametabolitethatplaysamajor role in the metabolism of cells in all living organisms (Tabor and Tabor, 1984) and it is a key compound in the transmethylation reactions (Lu, 2000). It is an intermediary in the transsulfuration pathway to cysteine, which is one of the three amino acids involved in glutathione and trypanothionesynthesis(FairlambandCerami1992;Mato etal .,2002;Tabor andTabor,1985).Inaddition,AI2proteinwhichisanautoinducerprotein inquorumsensingactivityisproducedfromsadenosylmethionine.Quorum sensing,orthecontrolofgeneexpressioninresponsetocelldensityandit has been shown that many pathogens use quorum sensing to regulate virulence. Quorum sensing involves the production and detection of extracellular signalling molecules called autoinducers. It is used by both Gramnegative and Grampositive bacteria to regulate a variety of physiological functions. In general, Gramnegative bacteria use acylated homoserine lactones as autoinducers while Grampositive bacteria use processed oligopeptides to communicate. On the other hand, highly conserved luxS homologueshavenowbeenidentifiedinbothGramnegative

58

and Grampositive bacteria species including Escherichia coli , Salmonella typhimurium , Salmonella typhi , Salmonella paratyphi , Haemophilus influenzae , Helicobacterpylori , Bacillussubtilis , Borreliaburgdorferi , Neisseria meningitidis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Yersinia pestis , Campylobacter jejuni , Vibrio cholerae, Deinococcus radiodurans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Enterococcus faecalis , Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium difficile, Shewanella putrefaciens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pasteurellamultocida (Surette etal .,1999)Mostof thespeciesofbacteria possessing a luxS gene have been shown to produce AI2 activity (Bonnie and Bassler, 1999). This result suggests that communication via an AI2 signal response system could be a common mechanism (Bassler, 1999; Surette etal .,1999;Bassleretal.,1997).AI2hasbeenshowntocontrola variety of cellular processes, such as production of pathogenicity factors in Streptococcuspyogenes (Lyon etal .,2001),toxinproductionin Clostridium perfringens (Ohtani et al ., 2002), and formation of mixed biofilm between the two oral bacteria Streptococcus gordonii and Porphyromonas gingivalis (Mcnab etal .,2003).

The immunogenicity of S adenosylmethionine synthatase was previously shown in a H. pylori immunoproteomics study (Lin et al ., 2006) and also Altındi etal .(2009)showedthatthisenzymeisanimmunogenicproteinof Bordetellapertussis inimmunoproteomicsstudies.Herein,wedemonstrated thatitisanimmunogenicproteinof C.chauvoei . 3.7.2 Glucose6phosphateIsomerase Glucose6phosphateisomerase(GPI)orphosphoglucoseisomerase(PGI)is universally distributed among eukaryotes, bacteria and some archaea. It

59

catalyzesthereversibleisomerizationofglucose6phosphateandfructose6 phosphate,whichisanessentialreactioninvolvedinbothcatabolicglycolysis andanabolicgluconeogenesis.ManyGPIshavebeenreportedfromplantsto animals and GPI has been one of the evidences for evolution theory (Grauvogel etal .,2007;Katz,1996). IthasbeenreportedthatGPIsareinvolvedinmanymetabolicpathways,for example,theymaybeoneofthemessengerstoresponsetothestimulation ofenvironmentfactorssuchasnitrateinplants(Munjral etal .,2007;Wang etal .,2003),andGPIsalsoactasanautocrinemotilityfactor(AMF)thatcan promote tumor cells metastasis and invasion by binding to their receptors (AMFR)inanimals(Chiu etal .,2008;Funasaka,2007).AstudybyPazour et al .(2005)showedthattheflagellarproteomeof Chlamydomonasreinhardtii (C. reinhardtii ) contained most of enzymes of the glycolytic pathway, suggesting GPIs, a ratelimiting enzyme in glycolytic pathway, may be related to the flagella of C. reinhardtii (Pazour et al ., 2005). While Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is an eukaryotic organism, a homology may be consideredbetweentwoGPIproteinsof C.reinhardtiiandC .chauvoei .For thatreason,flagellaproteinof C.chauvoei canalsoberelatedtoglucose6 phosphate isomerase. Besides that, motif searches can lead to important functions of proteins. Motif found in GPI enzyme of Vibrio vulnificus , a pathogenicbacteria,includesflagellarbasalbodyrodproteinssignatureand thissupportsourtheory(Richard,2004). Our study was the first implication of the existence of this protein in the immunoproteomeofabacterialpathogen.

60

3.7.3 OrnithineDecarboxylase Polyamines constitute a class of positively charged molecules found in all organisms. They are required for cell growth and reported to have various functions in stabilizing DNA or membrane structure, and in resistance to oxidative stress. Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) catalyzes the decarboxylation of Lornithine to form diamine putrescine, a rate limiting step in the polyamine synthesis pathway (Williams et al ., 1992). The expression of ODC is activated in macrophages by infection with S. typhimurium or treatment with S. typhimurium derived LPS (Prosser et al ., 1984).Moreover, Helicobacterpylori infectioncauseschronicinflammationof thegastricmucosathatresultfromanineffectiveimmuneresponse.Ithas been demonstrated that one underlying mechanism is induction of macrophage apoptosis mediated by polyamines. The transcription factor c Mychasbeenlinkedtoinductionofornithinedecarboxylase(ODC),therate limitingenzymeinpolyaminesynthesis(Cheng etal .,2005) Bailey etal .(2000)studiedonaknockoutstrainof Stagonospora (Septoria ) nodorum lacking the single ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) allele and pathogenicitystudiesonthesemutantsshowedthattheyaregreatlyreduced invirulencecomparedwithnondisruptedtransformants. The present article constitutes the first report on the immunogenicity of ornithinedecarboxylasefor C.chauvoei . 3.7.4 Flagellin The flagellum is the appendage responsible for motility in the majority of bacterialspecies.Thestructureofabacterialflagellumcanbedividedinto

61

three parts: the basal body, the hook and the flagellar protein. Flagellin is thestructuralproteinthatformsthemajorportionofflagellarfilaments.The flagellarfilamentiscomposedofapproximately20000subunitsofaunique protein, known as flagellin (Ramos et al ., 2004). Although most of the secreted flagellin is usually assembled in the flagellum, flagellin can also accumulate in the bacterial environment as a result of leaks and spillover duringtheconstructionofflagellae(Komoriya etal .,1999).Flagellarmotility allows bacteria to respond to favourable or unfavourable stimuli in their environment, and is also strongly related to the infectivity of some pathogenicbacteria(Finlay etal .,1997;Kersten etal .,2001). Flagella have been implicated as virulence determinants in several enteric pathogens.TheflagellaappeartobenecessaryforVibriocholerae toattach itself to the intestinal mucosa to deliver its toxin efficiently (Attridge and Rowley, 1983; Guentzel, and Berry, 1975). Immunization with crude flagellumvaccinesdecreasesthenumberofradiolabeledvibriosattachedto themucosaeofchallengedrabbits(Yancey etal .,1979).Flagellahavebeen reported to enhance pathogenicity in Salmonella typhimurium (Carsiotis et al., 1984;Weinstein etal., 1984),probablybyincreasingsurvivaltimewithin macrophages.Moreover,thegroups ofmiceimmunizedwith Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellarantigenpreparationsshowedhighersurvivalrateswhen theywerechallengedlocallyintheburnedarea,andtheprotectionappears tobeduetoimmobilizationofthemicroorganismsintheburnedskintissue (Holder etal .,1982).Motilityfunctionsof Helicobacterpylori ,Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibriocholerae arecrucialforinfectionofthestomach,lungs andintestinalmucosa,respectively (DrakeandMontie,1988 ; Ottemannand Lowenthal,2002;KrukonisandDiRita,2003).Colonizationofrabbitappendix by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium also depends on accessibility and motility (Marchetti, et al ., 2004). Because motility increases the

62

occurrence of host–pathogen interactions, this feature contributes to the main role of the flagellum in pathogenesis. Crude flagella from the opportunisticpathogen Clostridiumdifficile bindtocecalmucusofgermfree mice(Tasteyreetal .,2001).Inaddition,nonflagellated C.difficile associate withthececaltissueataratethatis10foldlowerthanthatofaflagellated strain,highlightingtheinvivoroleofflagellainadherencetomucus.

Inthisstudy,theflagellinfliB(C)proteinof C.chauvoei ATCC11957strain was identified as 43.5 kDa protein. It is smaller than that obtained with different strains used in other previous studies. Genero et al . (1999) determined the C. chauvoei strain 5078 flagella protein as a 47 kDa one. While C.chauvoei Okinawastrainflagellarproteinwasdefinedas56kDaby Tamura et al . (1995), it was found as 46 kDa by Kojima et al . (1999). Besides that, it was reported that DNA sequence analysis of C. chauvoei Okinawa strain fliC gene encoding the flagellin protein revealed an open readingframeof413aminoacidresidueswithacalculatedmolecularmass of 43,8 kDa (Kojima et al ., 2000). There might be some strain based differences.Moreover,ourstudyisthefirstproteomicstudyof C.chauvoei and first MS analysis of its immunoreactive proteins. Therefore, any discrepanciesbetweenexperimentalandtheoreticalmassesmighthavebeen causedbyposttranslationalproteolyticprocessingandmodifications.Strain basedvariationsthathavebeenfrequentlyencounteredmustalsobetaken intoaccount.

63

CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION

• Hemolysinproteinhasbeensuspectedtobeamajorvirulencefactor of C. chauvoei . In the study, hemolysin activity of the strains C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 and 20 were observed highest at the late logaritmicandearlystationaryphases.Therewasalmostnohemolytic activity to be remained during the late stationary phase though the proteinstillexistedincultures.Therefore,experimentalvaccineswere preparedbyusingonedaygrowninactivatedwholecellswhichwere expectedtocontainhemolysin.

• Antibody response evaluation by ELISA indicates that sera obtained frommiceimmunizedwithexperimentalvaccineshadahightiterof IgG.Asexpected,theseserawereeffectivelyusedinimmunoblotting analysis.

• 1DE SDSPAGE and Western blot analysis for protein profiles of C. chauvoei ATCC 11957 and 20 strains showed that there is no significantdifferencebetweenthesestrainswithrespecttotheprotein profile.Also,theageoftherespectiveculturesdidnotinfluencethe proteinprofiles.

64

• In the present, study, first successful 2DE gel representation of C. chauvoei was constructed and a total of 460 protein spots could be detected.

• Thepresentstudyconstitutedthefirstimmunoproteomicsanalysisof C. chauvoei . A total of 4 immunoreactive proteins o f C . chauvoei (ornithine decarboxylase, methionine adenosyltransferase, glucose6 phosphate isomerase, and flagellin FliB (C)) protein were identified. Glucose6phosphateisomerasewasidentifiedasimmunogenicasthe firsttimeinapathogenicmicrobeandmethionineadenosyltransferase and ornithine decarboxylation were identified as immunogenic for C . chauvoei forthefirsttime.OtheridentifiedproteinflagellinFliB(C)is known to be major protective antigen and virulence factor of C. chauvoei . This protein appeared in 4 parallel spots, strongly suggesting posttranslational charge modification of this protein. Furtherworkmustbeperformedwiththeseantigenicproteinsinorder todetermineiftheygenerateaprotectiveimmuneresponseeitherby aloneorindifferentcombinations .

65

REFERENCES

Alam SI, Bansod S, Kumar RB, SenguptaN and Singh L (2009) Differential proteomic analysis of Clostridium perfringens ATCC13124; identification of dominant, surface and structure associated proteins. BMC Microbiol 9: 162. AlbertsB,JohnsonA,LewisJ,RaffM etall :MolecularBiologyofthe Cell ,Edition:4,GarlandScience,NewYorkandLondon, 2002 . Altindi E¸ Burcu ET, Yildirim V, Ozcengiz E, Becherc D, Hecker M andOzcengizG(2008) Immunoproteomicanalysisof Bordetellapertussis andidentificationofnewimmunogenicproteins. Vaccine 27: 5428. AndersonLandSeilhamerJ(1997) AcomparisonofselectedmRNAand proteinabundancesinhumanliver. Electrophoresis 18: 533537. Anderson NL, Matheson AD and Steiner S (2000) Proteomics: applications in basic and applied biology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 11: 408412. Bailey A, Mueller E and Bowyer P (2000) Ornithine Decarboxylase of Stagonospora(Septoria)nodorumIsRequiredforVirulencetowardWheat. J BiolChem 275: 142427. BanksRE,DunnMJ,HochstrasserDF, etal.(2000) Proteomics:new perspectives,newbiomedicalopportunities. TheLancet 356: 17491756. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology , vol. 1. The Williams & WilkinsCo.,Baltimore. Bassler BL, Greenberg EP, Stevens AM: Crossspecies induction of luminescence in the quorum sensing bacterium Vibrio harveyi . J Bacteriol 1997, 179 :40434045. BasslerBL(1999) Amultichanneltwocomponentsignalingrelaycontrols quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi . In Cell–Cell Signaling in Bacteria . ASM , 259273.

66

BjellqvistB,EkK,RighettiPG,GianazzaE,GörgA,WestermeierR and Postel W (1982) Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: principle, methodology and some applications. J Biochem Biophys Methods 6: 317339. Bollinger O (1875) Beitrag zur Kenntnis des sogenantes 'Gerausches,"' einerangeblichenMilzbrandform. DschZTiermedVerglPathol 1: 297299. BrötzOesterhelt H, Bandow E and Labischinski H (2004) Bacterial ProteomicsandItsRoleinAntibacterialDrugDiscovery. MassSpectromRev 24: 54965. Bruner DW and Gillespie JH: Hagan’s Infectious Diseases of DomesticAnimals ,Edition:5,pp361367,CornellUniversityPress,Ithaca andLondon, 1996 . CalabiEandFairweatherN(2002) Patternsofsequenceconservationin theSlayerproteinsandrelatedsequencesin Clostridiumdifficile . JBacteriol 184: 38863897. Cato EP, George WL and Finegold SM: Genus Clostridium Prazmowski 1880,23AL,pp11411200.InP.SneathHA,MairNS,SharpeMEandHolt GE(ed.), 1986 . Cavalieri SJ and Snyder IS (1982) Effect of Escherichia coli alpha hemolysin on human peripheral leukocyte viability in vitro. Infect Immun 36: 45561. Celis JE and Bravo R : Twodimensional Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins: MethodsandApplications,AcademicPress,NewYork, 1984 . Celis JE, Ostergaard M, Jensen NA, et al. (1998) Human and mouse proteomicdatabases:novelresourcesintheproteinuniverse. Federationof EuropeanBiochemicalSocieties 430: 6472. Celis JE, Kruhoffer M, Gromova I, et al. (2000) Gene expression profiling: monitoring transcription and translation products using DNA microarrays and proteomics. Federation of European Biochemical Societies 480: 216. ChandlerHMandGulasekharamJ.(1974) Theprotectivestrainof Clostridiumchauvoeiincludinganevaluationofitsflagellaasaprotective antigen. J.Gen.Appl.Microbiol 84 :128134.

67

ChandlerHMandHamiltonRC(1975) Thepreparationofimmunogenic cell walls from highly protective strain of Clostridium chauvoei . J Gen Microbiol 88: 2735. Cheng Y, Chaturvedi R, Asim M, Bussie FI, Xu H, Casero RA and Wilson KT (2005) Helicobacter pylori induced Macrophage Apoptosis Requires Activation of Ornithine Decarboxylase by cMyc. J Biol Chem 280: 224926. Chiu CG, StPierre P, Nabi IR, et al (2008) Autocrine motility factor receptor:aclinicalreview. ExpertRevAnticancerTher 8: 207217. CompendiumofBeefProducts(1993) NorthAmericanCompendiums, PortHuron,MI. CorthalsGL,WasingerVC,HochstrasserDFandSanchezJC(2000) The dynamic range of protein expression: a challenge for proteomic research. Electrophoresis 21: 11041115. Cortinas TI, Mattar MA and Stefanini de Guzman AM (1999) Alpha and beta toxin activities in local strains of Clostridium chauvoei . Anaerobe 5: 2979. CrichtonR,SolomonJandBartonAM(1990) Developmentofenzyme linked immunosorbent assay for measuring the potency of vaccines containing Clostridiumchauvoei antigen. Biologicals 18: 4954. DrudyD,CalabiE,KyneL,SougioultzisS,KellyE,FairweatherNand Kelly CP (2004) Human antibody response to surface layer proteins in Clostridiumdifficile infection. FEMSImmunolMedMicrobiol 41: 237242. Floyd Jr JG: Blackleg and other clostridial diseases in cattle, AlabamaCooperativeExtensionSystem,ANR0888,1994. Funasaka T and Raz A (2007) The role of autocrine motility factor in tumorandtumormicroenvironment. CancerMetastasisRev 26: 725735. GaussC , KalkumM,LöweM,LehrachHandKloseJ(1999) Analysis of the mouse proteome. (I) Brain proteins: separation by twodimensional electrophoresis and identification by mass spectrometry and genetic variation. Electrophoresis 20: 575600.

68

Görg A, Weiss W and Dunn MJ (2004) Current twodimensional electrophoresistechnologyforproteomics. Proteomics 4: 366585. GörgA,ObermaierC,BoguthG,HarderA,ScheibeB,WildgruberR andWeissW(2000) Thecurrentstateoftwodimensionalelectrophoresis withimmobilizedpHgradients. Electrophoresis 21: 10371053. Grauvogel C, Brinkmann H and Petersen J (2007) Evolution of the glucose6phosphate isomerase: the plasticity of primary metabolism in photosyntheticeukaryotes. MolBiolEvol 24: 16111621. HathewayC(1990)ToxigenicClostridia, ClinicalMicrobiologyReviews 66 68 Hang'ombeBM,IsogaiE,LunguJ,MubitaC,NambotaA,KirisawaR, Kimura K and Isogai H (2000) Detection and characterization of Clostridium species in soil of Zambia. Comp Immun Microbiol Infect Dis 23: 277284. Heller HH (1920) Aetiology of acute gangrenous infections of animals: a discussion of blackleg, braxy, malignant oedema and whale septicemia. J InfectDis 27: 385451. Hirsh DC, Maclachlan NJ and Walker RL : Veterinary Microbiology, Edition:2,p206,WileyBlackwell, 2004 . Katz LA (1996) Transkingdom transfer of the phosphoglucose isomerase gene. JMolEvol 43: 453459. Kerrin JC (1934) The haemolytic and toxic activities of filtrates of Cl . chauvoei . JPatholBacteriol 38: 21929. King RC and Stansfield WD : A Dictionary of Genetics, p 129, Oxford UniversityPress,NewYork,Oxford, 1990 . KhanAS,MujerCV,AlefantisTG,ConnollyJP,MayrUB,WalcherP, et al. (2006) Proteomics and bioinformatics strategies to design countermeasuresagainstinfectioustreatagents. JChemInfModel 46: 111 5. Klade CS (2002) Proteomics approaches towards antigen discovery and vaccinedevelopment. CurrOpinMolTher 4: 216223.

69

Kojima A, Uchida I, Sekizaki T, Sasaki Y, Ogikuba Y, Kijima M, TamuraY(2000) CloningandexpressionofageneencodingtheFlagellin ofClostridiumchauvoei.VeterinaryMicrobiology 76 :359372 LaemmliUK(1970) Cleavageofstructuralproteinsduringtheassemblyof theheadofbacteriophageT4. Nature 227: 680685. Lyon,W.R.,J.C.Madden,J.C.Levin,J.L.Stein,andM.G.Caparon (2001) Mutationof luxS affectsgrowthandvirulencefactorexpressionin Streptococcus pyogenes.Mol.Microbiol. 42: 145–157. O'Farrell PH (1975) High resolution twodimensional electrophoresis of proteins.JBiolChem.250: 40074021. Ohtani,K.,H.Hayashi,andT.Shimizu(2002) The luxS geneisinvolved incellcellsignallingfortoxinproductionin Clostridiumperfringens.Mol. Microbiol. 44: 171–179. McFarland LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RYY and Stamm WE (1989) Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 320: 204210. MacLennanJD(1943) AnaerobicinfectionsofwarwoundsintheMiddle East. Lancet ii: 123126. MacLennan J D (1962) The histotoxic clostridial infections of man. BacteriolRev 26: 177276. McNab,R.,S.K.Ford,A.ElSabaeny,B.Barbieri,G.S.Cook,andR. J. Lamont (2003) LuxSbased signaling in Streptococcus gordonii : autoinducer2 controlscarbohydratemetabolismandbiofilmformationwith Porphyromonas gingivalis.J.Bacteriol . 185: 274–284. Moussa RS (1958) Complexity of toxins from Clostridium septicum and Clostridiumchauvoei . JBacteriol 76: 53845. Moussa RS (1959) Antigenic formulae for Clostridium septicum and Clostridiumchauvoei . JPatholBacteriol 77: 34150. MunjralN,GuptaAKandKaurN(2007) Studiesonglucosemetabolizing enzymes in cytosolic and bacteroidal fractions of mungbean ( Vigna radiata L.)andlentil( Lensculinaris L.)nodules. IndianJBiochemBiophys 44: 186 189.

70

Neuhoff, V., Arold, N., Taube, D., Ehrhardt, W. (1988). Improved stainingofproteinsinpolyacrylamidegelsincludingisoelectricfocusinggels withclearbackgroundatnanogramsensitivityusingCoomassieBrilliantBlue G250andR250. Electrophoresis 9:255–262. Pazour GJ, Agrin N, Leszyk J, et al (2005) Proteomic analysis of a eukaryoticcilium. JCellBiol 170: 103113. Princewill TJ and Oakley CL (1976) Deoxyribonucleases and hyaluronidases of Clostridium septicum and Clostridium chauvoei . III. Relationshipbetweenthetwoorganisms. MedLabSci 33: 110118. ProsserFH,SchmidtCJ,NicholsSVandNicholsWK(1984) Induction of ornithine decarboxylase, RNA, and protein synthesis in macrophage cell lanesstimulatedbyimmunoadjuvants. JCellPhysiol 120: 7582. Quinn P.J : Clinical veterinary microbiology: Chap.17, pp.191202. Elsevier HealthSciences, 1994 . RabilloudT(1999) SilverStainingof2Delectrophoresisgels. Methodsin MolecularBiology 112: 297305. RamachandranS(1969) Haemolyticactivitiesof Cl.Chauvoei . IndianVet J.46: 75468.

RamagliLSandRodriquezLV(1985). Quantificationofmicrogramamountof proteinin2dimensionalPAGEsamplebuffer. Electrophoresis . 6:559563.

RichardGP(2004). Structuralandfunctionalanalysesofphosphoglucose isomerase from Vibrio vulnificus and its lysyl aminopeptidase activity. BiochimicaetBiophysicaActa.1702 :89–102.

Richey EJ : Clostridial (blackleg) diseases of cattle, VM48 Series, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, UniversityofFlorida, 2004 .

Serruto D and Rappuoli R (2006) Postgenomic vaccine development. FEBSLett 580: 298592. SinghKP,PariharNSandTripathiBN(1993) Pathologyofexperimental Clostridiumchauvoei infectioninhillbulls. IndianVetJ 70: 511551.

71

SkalkaB(1985) Hyaluronidasetestinthediagnosisofstaphylococci. Vet.Med.(Prague) 30 :373378.

Smith HW and Linggood MA (1971) Observations on the pathogenic propertiesoftheK88,HlyandEntplasmidsof E.coli withparticularreference toporcinediarrhea. JMedMicrobiol 4: 46785. Smith LD and Williams BL : Clostridium chauvoei in the Pathogenic AnaerobicBacteria,Edition:3,pp164190,CharlesC.Thomas,Springfield, IL, 1984 . SuretteMG,MillerMB,BasslerBL: Quorumsensingin Escherichiacoli , Salmonellatyphimurium and Vibrioharveyi :anewfamilyof genesinvolved inautoinducerproduction. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 1999, 96 :16391644. Steel LF, Haab BB and Hanash SM (2005) Methods of comparative proteomic profiling for disease diagnostics. J Chromatogr, B, Anal Technol BiomedLifeSci 815: 275284. Switzer, R.C., Merril, C.R., Shifrin, S(1979). A highly sensitive silver stain for detecting proteins and peptides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem . 98: 12317.

Tamura Y, Minamoto N and Tanaka S (1984) Demonstration of protective antigen carried by Clostridium chauvoei . Microbiol Immunol 43: 612616. TitballRWandRoodJ : Clostridiumperfringens woundinfection. Molecular Medical Microbiology, pp 18751904, Sussman M. Newcastle, United Kingdom:AcademicPress; 2001 . Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: Procedure and some applications (ribosomal proteins/radioimmunoassay/fluorescent antibody assay/peroxidaseconjugated antibody/autoradiography). Biochemistry 76 : 43504354 Tyers M and Mann M (2003) From genomics to proteomics. Nature 422: 1937.

72

Wang R, Okamoto M, Xing X, et al (2003) Microarray analysis of the nitrateresponseinArabidopsisrootsandshootsrevealsover1,000rapidly respondinggenesandnewlinkagestoglucose,trehalose6phosphate,iron, andsulfatemetabolism. PlantPhysiol 132: 556567. Williams LJ, Barnett GR, Ristow JL, Pitkin J, Perriere M and Davis RH (1992) Ornithine decarboxylase gene of Neurospora crassa : Isolation, sequence, and polyaminemediated regulation of its mRNA. Mol Cell Biol 12: 347359. Willis AT : Clostridia of wound infection, Butterworths,London, 19

73

APPENDIX A Composition and PreparationofCultureMedia

M12VMEDIUM ASOLUTION (Autoclaveseparately) Tryptone10g/l YeastExtract5g/l NaCl5g/l SolubleStarch1g/l Peptone4g/l CasaminoAcids6g/l pH:7,6 BSOLUTION (Filtersterilization) LCysteineHCl6g/l Dextrose0.6g/l VITAMINSOLUTION (Filtersterilization)(4,4mlto1Lmedium)

74

Calciumpantothenate4mg ThiaminHCL1mg PyridoxineHCl1mg Riboflavin1mg Biotinsolution90µl Ethanol4.6ml

H2013.1ml BiotinSolution:2,5mg/mlBiotin NutrientBrothMedium(NB) BeefExtract3g/l Peptone5g/l pH:6,8±0,2 NutrientAgarMedium(NA) BeefExtract3g/l Peptone5g/l Agar20g/l pH:6,8±0,2

75

APPENDIX B

SolutionsandBuffers CoomassieBrilliantBlue(CBB)StainingSolutions CoomassieBrilliantBlue(CBB)StockSolution CoomassieBrilliantBlueG2505g dH 2O100ml FixationSolution 40%Ethanol125ml 10%AceticAcid25ml

50%dH 2O100ml CCBDyeSolution Ammoniumsulfate100g 85%phosphoricacid12ml CBBstocksolution20ml Distilledwateraddto1000ml

76

CCBStainingSolution CCBdyesolution200ml Methanol50ml SilverStainingSolutions FixationSolution 50%Methanol100ml 12%AceticAcid24ml 0.05%Formaldehyde100µl PretreatmentSolution 0.02%SodiumThiosulfate ImpregnateSolution

0.2%AgNO3

DevelopmentSolution 2.25%SodiumThiosulfate 0.05%Formaldehyde 2%Pretreatmentsolution

77

StopSolution %50Methanol %12AceticAcid SDSPAGESOLUTIONS Acrylamide/Bis Acrylamide146g N.N’MethylenebisAcrylamide 4g Distilledwaterto500mL.Filteredandstoredat4C.Protectedformlight. TrisHCl(1.5M) Trisbase54.45g dH 2O 150ml pHisadjustedto8.8withHCl,distilledwaterto300mLandstoredat4°C. TrisHCl(0.5M) Trisbase 6g dH 2O60ml pHisadjustedto6.8withHCl,distilledwaterto100mLandstoredat4 °C. TrisEDTABuffer(TE) Tris10mM EDTA 1mM

78

pHisadjustedto8.0withHCl. RunningBuffer(5X) Trisbase 15g Glycine 72g SDS 5g Distilledwaterto1LStoredat4°C. SampleBuffer dH 2O3ml TrisHCl(0.5M)1ml Glycerol1.6ml SDS(10%)0.4ml βmercaptoethanol0.4ml Bromophenolblue(0.5%,w/v)(inwater)0.4mL WESTERNandDOTBLOTSOLUTIONS TransferBuffer Methanol200ml TrisBase3,63g Glycine14,4g SDS 0,37g dH 2Oupto1Liter

79

TBS TrisBase2,42g NaCl 29,24g DestainingSolution Methanol100ml GlacialAceticacid100ml dH 2O800ml BradfordReagent5X

%85H 3PO 4100ml Methanol50ml ComassieblueG100mg dH 2Oupto200ml

RehaydrationBuffer

Urea8M

Thiourea2M

Ampholite0,2M

DTT28mM

CHAPS2%m/v

dH 2Oupto10ml

80

APPENDIX C

ChemicalsandTheirSuppliers

ChemicalsChemicalSupplier

AceticacidMerck AcetoneMerck AcrylamideSigma AmmoniumsulphateMerck AmpholanespH(310)Fluka BeefExtractBD BisacryamideSigma BiotinSigma BovineSerumAlbumin(BSA)Sigma CalciumpantothenateSigma CasaminoAcidsBD

CH 3CNApplichem CHAPSMerck ComassieBrillantBlueG250Sigma DTTFluka DextroseBD EthanolMerck GlycerolMerck GlycineMerck

81

HCIMerck IPGstripsBIORAD

KH 2PO 4 Merck MethanolMerck

MgSO 4 7H 2OMerck MolecularWeightStandardFermentas NaOHMerck NH4ClMerck Peptone BD PyridoxineHClFluka RiboflavinSigma SDSSigma SolubleStarchBD TEMEDSigma TFAApplichem ThiamineHCL Fluka ThioureaFluka Trichloroaceticacid(TCA)Merck TrisHCISigma TryptoneBD UreaFluka YeastExtractBD

82