DOCSLIB.ORG

Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2006 RIFE - 12 Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2006 2007 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE SERVICE FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2006 RIFE - 12 November 2007 1 This report was compiled by the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science on behalf of the Environment Agency, Environment and Heritage Service, Food Standards Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. Printed on paper made from a minimum 75% de-inked post-consumer waste. Photograph reproduced with kind permission of the Health Protection Agency © Crown Copyright, 2007 Requests for the reproduction of materials contained in this report and for other information should be addressed to: • In England and Wales, Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Team of the Environment Agency ([email protected]) or the Emergency Planning, Radiation and Incidents Division of the Food Standards Agency (radiological.surveillance@ foodstandards.gsi.gov.uk) • In Scotland, the Radioactive Substances Unit of SEPA ([email protected]) and • In Northern Ireland, the Industrial Pollution and Radiochemical Inspectorate of EHS ([email protected]) Contents Page LIST OF TABLES ...............................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................................7 PREFACE .......................................................................................................................................................................9 TECHNICAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................11 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................21 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................21 1.1.1 Purpose and scope of the monitoring programmes ...........................................................................21 1.1.2 Dose assessments .............................................................................................................................22 1.2 Disposals of radioactive waste ................................................................................................................22 1.2.1 Radioactive waste disposal from nuclear sites ....................................................................................22 1.2.2 International agreements and the UK discharge strategy ...................................................................24 1.2.3 Managing radioactive liabilities in the UK ..........................................................................................24 1.2.4 Regulator strategies and reviews .......................................................................................................25 1.2.5 Solid radioactive waste disposal at sea ..............................................................................................26 1.2.6 Other sources of radioactivity ............................................................................................................26 1.2.7 Food irradiation ................................................................................................................................27 2. Nuclear fuel production and reprocessing ....................................................................................................31 2.1 Capenhurst, Cheshire .............................................................................................................................32 2.2 Springfields, Lancashire ..........................................................................................................................33 2.3 Sellafield, Cumbria .................................................................................................................................36 2.3.1 Gaseous discharges ...........................................................................................................................36 2.3.2 Liquid discharges ..............................................................................................................................36 2.3.3 Monitoring of unusual pathways .......................................................................................................48 2.3.4 Doses to the public ...........................................................................................................................48 3. Research establishments ................................................................................................................................89 3.1 Culham, Oxfordshire ..............................................................................................................................90 3.2 Dounreay, Highland ................................................................................................................................90 3.3 Harwell, Oxfordshire ...............................................................................................................................92 3.4 Windscale, Cumbria ...............................................................................................................................93 3.5 Winfrith, Dorset ......................................................................................................................................93 3.6 Minor site ...............................................................................................................................................94 3.6.1 Imperial College Reactor Centre, Ascot, Berkshire .............................................................................94 3.6.2 Imperial Chemical Industries plc., Billingham, Cleveland ....................................................................94 3.6.3 Scottish Universities’ Environmental Research Centre, South Lanarkshire ...........................................94 4. Nuclear power stations ................................................................................................................................103 4.1 Berkeley, Gloucestershire and Oldbury, South Gloucestershire ..............................................................105 4.2 Bradwell, Essex .....................................................................................................................................107 4.3 Dungeness, Kent ..................................................................................................................................107 4.4 Hartlepool, Cleveland ...........................................................................................................................109 4.5 Heysham, Lancashire ............................................................................................................................110 4.6 Hinkley Point, Somerset ........................................................................................................................110 4.7 Sizewell, Suffolk ...................................................................................................................................111 4.8 Chapelcross, Dumfries and Galloway ....................................................................................................112 4.9 Hunterston, North Ayrshire ...................................................................................................................113 4.10 Torness, East Lothian ............................................................................................................................114 4.11 Trawsfynydd, Gwynedd ........................................................................................................................115 4.12 Wylfa, Isle of Anglesey ..........................................................................................................................117 5. Defence establishments ...............................................................................................................................147 5.1 Aldermaston, Berkshire .........................................................................................................................147 5.2 Barrow, Cumbria ..................................................................................................................................148 5.3 Derby, Derbyshire .................................................................................................................................148 5.4 Devonport, Devon ................................................................................................................................149 5.5 Faslane and Coulport, Argyll and Bute ..................................................................................................149 5.6 Holy Loch, Argyll and Bute ....................................................................................................................150 5.7 Rosyth, Fife ...........................................................................................................................................150 5.8
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Referendum on Separation for Scotland
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry into the referendum on separation for Scotland are included. List of written evidence Page 1 Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent 1 2 Francis Tusa, Editor, Defence Analysis 8 3 Professor Jo Shaw, University of Edinburgh 14 4 Dr Phillips O’Brien, Scottish Centre for War Studies, University of Glasgow 21 5 Electoral Commission 24 6 Rt Hon Michael Moore MP, Secretary of State for Scotland 28 7 Ministry of Defence 29 8 Brian Buchan, Chief Executive, Scottish Engineering 46 9 Babcock 47 Written evidence from Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent Introduction If Scotland were to become independent, its relationship with the United Kingdom would have to be defined in the fields of nationality law and immigration law and policy. This note offers a summary of the relationship between the Irish state1 and the United Kingdom in those fields, and some thoughts on possible implications for Scottish independence. 1. Nationality Law 1.1 The Irish case A new nationality The nationality law of a new state must necessarily provide for two matters: an initial population of nationals on the date of independence, and the acquisition and loss of nationality on an ongoing basis. In the case of the Irish state, the initial population was defined by Article 3 of the Irish Free State Constitution of 1922. Article 3 conferred Irish Free State citizenship upon a person if they were domiciled in the “area of the jurisdiction of the Irish Free State” on the date the state was founded (6 December 1922), provided (a) they had been resident in that area for the previous seven years, or (b) they or one of their parents had been born in “Ireland”.2 A full framework of nationality law, covering all aspects of acquisition and loss of nationality, was not then adopted until the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • HMNB Clyde Health and Safety Report 2009-10
    HM Naval Base Clyde I I Health & Safety Annual Report Safety, Health, Environment & Fire 2009/10 Progressing Positive, Pro-active Safety Culture During 2009/10 we made good progress In reallslng our Heallh and Safety objectives. which were bui~ on previous learning and improvement. and continued towards our ambition of ensuring that every person entering HMNB Clyde goes "home sate. every day·. • Our processes and procedures continued to be sharpened to reftect best practice. • All areas now hove robust. maturing Heallh and Safety improvement plans and we continue to challenge so that there is no place for complacency. • We put a special focus on Alcohol and Drugs through a tailored wellbeing programme. • We continued to invest in developing "leaders of Safety' through our IIF Programme which is the backbone of our behavioural approoch to solely • We encouraged one of the most comprehensive independent Peer reviews ever conducted at HMNB Clyde. A group of specialists from other sectors of the nuclear industry and representatives of regulatory organisations were invited to assess ou organisation and arrangements against their best practice and learning. Their report was positive and we are taking forward suggestions on further improving our safety performance. • To reach audiences Internally and externally. we organised or took port In events such as exhibitions and Road shows demonstrating our commilment to a positive safety culture. During the year under review. we finalised our new Solely Slrategy which sets out our long term objectives on Safety. Environment. Nuclear and Social practices that should be expected of the Base. For 2011/12 our objectives wUI be prloritised to ensure the highest of standards in improvement measures.
    [Show full text]
  • LLW Repository, Holmrook, Cumbria: Repository Development to Vault 11
    LLW Repository, Holmrook, Cumbria: Repository Development to Vault 11 Planning Statement RP/3400737/PROJ/00049 30th October 2015 LLW Repository Limited Low Level Waste Repository Site Holmrook Cumbria CA19 1XH United Kingdom Telephone: 019467 24800 Email: [email protected] © Copyright in this document belongs to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority This page is left blank intentionally. RP/3400737/PROJ/00049 LLW Repository Ltd: Repository Development to Vault 11 Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 The Applicant .......................................................................................... 5 1.2 The Application ....................................................................................... 5 1.3 Background ............................................................................................. 6 2 The Application Site and Surroundings ............................................................ 9 2.1 The Location ........................................................................................... 9 2.2 LLWR Site ............................................................................................... 9 3 Form and Content of Application .................................................................... 13 3.1 Pre-Application Advice .......................................................................... 14 4 Background to the Proposals ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Better Defence Estate November 2016 Amended Version: December 2016 Front Cover: a II (Army Cooperation) Squadron Typhoon in Front of the Squadron’S New HQ
    A Better Defence Estate November 2016 Amended version: December 2016 Front Cover: A II (Army Cooperation) Squadron Typhoon in front of the squadron’s new HQ. RAF Lossiemouth © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London T W9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Contents Preface by the Secretary of State for Defence and Chief of the Defence Staff .......................... 5 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Part A - Our Strategic Approach ................................................................................................................. 9 Part B – A Better Defence Estate Strategy ............................................................................................12 a. Royal Navy........................................................................................................................................14 b. Army ...................................................................................................................................................17 c. Royal Air Force ................................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Off-Site Emergency Planning and Prior Information Areas for HM Naval Base Clyde (Faslane)
    [Type text] Commodore M E Gayfer ADC Royal Navy Naval Base Commander (Clyde) Lomond Building Her Majesty’s Naval Base Clyde Redgrave Court Merton Road Helensburgh Bootle Argyll and Bute Merseyside L20 7HS G84 8HL Telephone: Email: Our Reference: TRIM Ref: 2017/22779 Unique Number: CNB70127 Date: 28th February 2017 RADIATION (EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION) REGULATIONS 2001 (REPPIR) – HMNB CLYDE (FASLANE) EMERGENCY PLANNING AND PRIOR INFORMATION AREAS Dear Commodore Gayfer, As you are aware, ONR has been re-determining the REPPIR off-site emergency planning area(1) and the area within which prior information shall be provided to the public(2) around the HMNB Clyde (Faslane) DNSR Authorised Site as prescribed in REPPIR regulations 9(1) and 16(1) respectively. On behalf of the Ministry of Defence (MOD), Naval Base Commander (Clyde) (NBC) has made a declaration to ONR that there is no change to the circumstances that might affect its Report of Assessment (RoA) for the naval submarine reactor plant. Our re-determination has been made in accordance with ONR’s principles and guidance for the determination(3) of such areas and this letter is to inform Navy Command, as the MOD duty-holder with responsibility under REPPIR for supplying prior information to members of the public around the HMNB Clyde (Faslane) DNSR Authorised Site, of the following: 1. ONR notes that, in accordance with the requirements of regulations 5 and 6, NBC has reviewed its Hazard Identification and Risk Evaluation (HIRE) and Report of Assessment (RoA) for the naval submarine reactor plant, and has submitted to ONR a declaration of no change of circumstances, as provided for under regulation 5(2).
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2019 25Th Edition
    Radioactivity in Food and the Environment,25th edition 2019 RIFE - 24 Radioactivity in Food and RIFE - 23 the Environment, 2018 .uk -ni.gov daera www. Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2017 2019 RIFE - 22 .uk -ni.gov daera www. 2018 .uk -ni.gov daera www. Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2016 2017 RIFE - 21 .uk -ni.gov daera www. 2016 Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2015 Summary of Radioactivity in Food Summary of Radioactivity and the Environment (2004–2016) RIFE - 20 - RIFE in Food and the Environment 2015 2004-2008 2003 Environment, the Radioactivity in Food and Food in Radioactivity Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2004 RIFE - 10 2004 Radioactivity in Food and Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2005 RIFE - 11 the Environment, 2006 RIFE - 12 t d d en an el Ir nm cy rn rn ro he vi rt Agen En No uk Radioactivity in v. RIFE - Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2007 13 the Environment, 2008 RIFE - 14 Food and ni-environment.go . the Environment, 2014 Environment, the Radioactivity in Food and and Food in Radioactivity www 2005 Ireland n Radioactivity in Food and Norther RIFE 2014 the Environment, 2009 ­ 15 Radioactivity in Food and 9 - RIFE Environment RIFE - 16 Agency the Environment, 2010 2006 2007 ni-environment.gov.uk Radioactivity in Food and www. RIFE - 17 Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2011 www. 2005 RIFEni-environment.gov.uk - 18Norther Environmentn Ireland the Environment, 2012 Agency RIFE - 19 - RIFE www. ni-environment.gov.uk Norther 2008 Environmentn Ireland Agency 2009 the Environment, 2004 Environment, the Radioactivity in Food and Food Radioactivityin in FoodRadioactivity and RIFE - 19 Radioactivity in Food and the Environment, 2013 RIFE - 20 www.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes a to J
    PCR Annexes A-C Submarine Dismantling Project (SDP) Post-Consultation Report on the Site for Interim Storage of Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste Annexes A to J July 2015 Contents A Consultation Press Release B Consultation Document Map C Exhibition Adverts D Local Workshop Reports E National Workshop Reports F Submissions from Organisations and Elected Representatives G Feedback Forms H Emails and Letters I Advisory Subgroup Reports J Statistical Breakdown Annex A: ISS Consultation Press Release PRESS RELEASE 134/2014 16 October 2014 MoD confirms sites for submarine dismantling consultations Five UK nuclear facilities have been confirmed as potential sites to store waste from decommissioned nuclear-powered submarines. A public consultation process will now help to determine which site is selected. The sites, which already hold radioactive materials, are either owned by MOD, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) or industry. They are: • the Atomic Weapons Establishment sites at Aldermaston and Burghfield in Berkshire which are owned by MOD and run by AWE plc; • Sellafield in west Cumbria, owned by the NDA; • Chapelcross in Dumfriesshire, owned by the NDA; • Capenhurst in Cheshire, which is run by Capenhurst Nuclear Services. Philip Dunne MP, Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology: “When the submarines in the Royal Navy fleet reach the end of their lives we need to dispose of them in a way that is safe, secure and environmentally sound. “This open and transparent public consultation process provides the opportunity to work closely with local communities near to potential sites to listen carefully to their views with the aim of delivering a solution that achieves these objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Habits Survey: HMNB Clyde (Faslane and Coulport)
    Radiological Habits Survey: HMNB Clyde (Faslane & Coulport) 2016 Public Report Radiological Habits Survey: HMNB Clyde (Faslane & Coulport) 2016 FF i ii Radiological Habits Survey: HMNB Clyde (Faslane & Coulport) 2016 Authors and Contributors: I. Dale, P. Smith, A. Tyler, A. Watterson, D. Copplestone, A. Varley, S. Bradley, L. Evans, P Bartie, M. Clarke, M. Blake, P. Hunter and R. Jepson External Reviewer: A. Elliott iii Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory & Occupational and Environmental Health Group Contents List of abbreviations and definitions .................................................................................................... viii Units ..................................................................................................................................................... viii Summary ................................................................................................................................................ ix 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Regulatory Context ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Definition of the Representative Person ................................................................................ 2 1.3 Dose Limits and Constraints .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Habits Survey Aim ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Defence in a Competitive Age
    Defence in a competitive age CP 411 Defence in a competitive age Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Defence by Command of Her Majesty March 2021 CP 411 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: SPOStrategy- [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-2462-6 CCS0221109268. 03/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office DEFENCE IN A COMPETITIVE AGE Foreword from the Secretary of State for Defence 01 Changing strategic context 05 02 The future battlefield 09 03 Our strategic approach 11 04 Evolving for the future 15 05 Defence’s contribution to Global Britain 27 06 Our workforce: our finest asset 35 07 Modernised forces for a competitive age 39 08 A stronger relationship with industry 61 09 Transforming our ways of working 65 Defence in a competitive age Foreword from the Secretary of State for Defence As a young officer, thirty years ago almost to the day, I was summoned to the drill square to have read aloud key decisions from the government’s defence review, Options for Change.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset for the Royal Marines? the Royal Marines and UK Amphibious Capability: Government Response to the Committee’S Third Report
    House of Commons Defence Committee Sunset for the Royal Marines? The Royal Marines and UK amphibious capability: Government Response to the Committee’s Third Report Sixth Special Report of Session 2017–19 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 May 2018 HC 1044 Published on 16 May 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) (Chair) Leo Docherty MP (Conservative, Aldershot) Martin Docherty-Hughes MP (Scottish National Party, West Dunbartonshire) Rt Hon Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh and Wickford) Graham P Jones MP (Labour, Hyndburn) Johnny Mercer MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Moor View) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Ruth Smeeth MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) Rt Hon John Spellar MP (Labour, Warley) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff Mark Etherton (Clerk), Dr Adam Evans (Second Clerk), Martin Chong, David Nicholas, Eleanor Scarnell, and Ian Thomson (Committee Specialists), Sarah Williams (Senior Committee Assistant) and Arvind Gunnoo (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • Consequence Reports
    Consequences Reports HMNB Clyde, RNAD Coulport and LochGoil Operational Berth HMNB Clyde Part 1 – Factual Information 1. Regulation 7(3) Schedule 4 Clause 1(a) - Name and address of the operator: a. Naval Base Commander Clyde (NBC(C)). b. Her Majesty’s Naval Base Clyde, Faslane, Helensburgh, Argyll and Bute, G84 8HL. 2. Regulation 7(3) Schedule 4 Clause 1(b) - Postal address of the premises where the radioactive substance will be processed, manufactured, used or stored, or where the facilities for processing, manufacture, use of storage exist: a. Her Majesty’s Naval Base Clyde, Faslane, Helensburgh, Argyll and Bute, G84 8HL. 3. Regulation 7(3) Schedule 4 Clause 1(c) - The date on which it is anticipated that the work with ionising radiation will commence or, if it has already commenced, a statement to that effect: a. HMNB(C) Faslane has worked with ionising radiation to provide technical, logistic and administrative support to nuclear-powered warships since 1963. Part 2 – Recommendations 1. Regulation 7(3) Schedule 4 Clause 2(a) - The proposed minimum geographical extent from the premises to be covered by the local authority’s off-site emergency plan: a. The proposed minimum geographical extent from the premises to be covered by the local authority’s detailed emergency plan is an area extending to a distance of 1.5 km from a submarine berth. b. An outline planning zone of 5 km has been determined for HMNB(C) Faslane by the Secretary of State for Defence in accordance with regulation 9(1)(c). 2. Regulation 7(3) Schedule 4 Clause 2(b) – The minimum distances to which urgent protective actions may need to be taken, marking against each distance the timescale for implementation of the relevant action; and Clause 3(a) – The recommended urgent protective actions to be taken within that zone, if any, together with timescales for the implementation of those actions.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Neptune Medical Centre
    Defence Medical Services HMS Neptune Medical Centre Quality Report HMNB Clyde Helensburgh Argyll & Bute Scotland Date of inspection visit: 21/6/2017 G84 8HL Date of publication: 21/8/2017 This report describes our judgement of the quality of care at this service. It is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, and information given to us from the provider and patients. Ratings Overall rating for this service Requires improvement Requires improvement Are services safe? Good Are services effective? Good Are services caring? Good Are services responsive to people’s needs? Requires improvement Are services well-led? HMS Neptune Medical Centre Quality Report 21/6/2017 1 Summary of findings Overall summary Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice We carried out an announced inspection at HMS Neptune Medical Centre on 21 June 2017. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement. Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows: • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events. • The practice had defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety. However use of alerts on the electronic patient record system was not fully utilised by all staff. • Data showed patient outcomes in some areas were lower compared to the national average. For example, the management and recall of diabetic patients. • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. However there was no formal system for guidance and this was not consistently discussed or shared. • Areas of staff training required updating to fully provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
    [Show full text]