DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Integrity Assessments: Monitoring and Evaluation of Wildlife Areas in Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Integrity Assessments: Monitoring and Evaluation of Wildlife Areas in Washington ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS: MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF WILDLIFE AREAS IN WASHINGTON Michael A. Schroeder, Rex C. Crawford, F. Joseph Rocchio, D. John Pierce, and Matt Vander Haegen (this is just a draft list) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife August 2011 Draft 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 8 Overview of Ecological Integrity Assessments ........................................................................... 10 Definitions.............................................................................................................................. 11 Ecological Integrity .......................................................................................................... 11 Ecological Condition ....................................................................................................... 11 Desired Ecological Condition .......................................................................................... 11 Best Attainable Condition ................................................................................................ 11 Management Assessment Points ...................................................................................... 12 Importance of Ecological Classification ................................................................................ 12 Classification and Natural Range of Variation ................................................................ 12 National Vegetation Classification Standard ................................................................... 12 Integration of NVCS and Ecological Integrity Assessment ............................................ 13 Conceptual Ecological Models .............................................................................................. 14 Ecological Indicators and Metrics ......................................................................................... 14 Use of Indicators and Metrics in This Report .................................................................. 14 Selecting Metrics ............................................................................................................. 15 Three Level Approach to Metric Development ..................................................................... 16 Definitions of the Ecological Integrity Ranking Scale .......................................................... 19 Natural Range of Variation and Reference Conditions ......................................................... 21 Development of Metric Rankings .......................................................................................... 22 Stressor Checklist................................................................................................................... 22 Protocol for EIA metrics .............................................................................................................. 23 Landscape Context ................................................................................................................. 23 Buffer and Edge Length, Width, and Condition .............................................................. 23 Connectivity ..................................................................................................................... 26 Landscape Condition ....................................................................................................... 28 Relative and Absolute Size .............................................................................................. 29 Patch Diversity ................................................................................................................. 31 Vegetation Condition ............................................................................................................. 32 Cover of Native Species (Understory Plants) .................................................................. 32 Cover of Native Bunchgrass ............................................................................................ 33 Cover of Invasive Species ................................................................................................ 34 Cover of Native Increasers ............................................................................................... 35 Species Composition ........................................................................................................ 37 Shrub Cover ..................................................................................................................... 37 Canopy Cover and Condition .......................................................................................... 38 Regeneration of Woody Species ...................................................................................... 40 Course Woody Debris ...................................................................................................... 41 Organic Matter Accumulation ......................................................................................... 42 Biological Soil Crust ........................................................................................................ 43 Physicochemical and Hydrology ........................................................................................... 43 Soil Surface Condition ..................................................................................................... 43 Water Quality ................................................................................................................... 45 2 Water Source .................................................................................................................... 46 Channel and Streambank Stability ................................................................................... 46 Water Table ...................................................................................................................... 48 Hydrological Alteration ................................................................................................... 49 Hydroperiod ..................................................................................................................... 50 Hydrological Connectivity ............................................................................................... 51 Sand Dynamics ................................................................................................................ 53 Natural Disturbance Regime .................................................................................................. 53 Forest Pathogens .............................................................................................................. 53 Fire Condition Class ........................................................................................................ 54 On Site Land Use ............................................................................................................. 54 General Application of EIA ......................................................................................................... 56 Development of the EIA Model ............................................................................................. 56 Initial Development ......................................................................................................... 56 Field Testing .................................................................................................................... 56 Validation ......................................................................................................................... 57 General Application of the EIA for Monitoring and Assessment .......................................... 57 Communication and Reporting: The EIA Scorecard ....................................................... 58 Desired Ecological Conditions ........................................................................................ 60 Level 1 Assessment .......................................................................................................... 60 Level 2 Assessment .......................................................................................................... 62 Level 3 Assessment .......................................................................................................... 62 Integrated Monitoring Framework ................................................................................... 63 Specific Application of the EIA for Monitoring and Assessment ......................................... 64 Specific Ecosystems ......................................................................................................... 64 Specific Wildlife Areas .................................................................................................... 65 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................ 68 Appendix A: Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................. 89 Appendix B: Scientific Names ..................................................................................................... 92 Plants .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon
    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Kalmiopsis leachiana ISSN 1055-419X Volume 20, 2013 &ôùĄÿĂùñü KALMIOPSIS (irteen years, fourteen issues; that is the measure of how long Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2013 I’ve been editing Kalmiopsis. (is is longer than I’ve lived in any given house or worked for any employer. I attribute this longevity to the lack of deadlines and time clocks and the almost total freedom to create a journal that is a showcase for our state and society. (ose fourteen issues contained 60 articles, 50 book reviews, and 25 tributes to Fellows, for a total of 536 pages. I estimate about 350,000 words, an accumulation that records the stories of Oregon’s botanists, native )ora, and plant communities. No one knows how many hours, but who counts the hours for time spent doing what one enjoys? All in all, this editing gig has been quite an education for me. I can’t think of a more e*ective and enjoyable way to make new friends and learn about Oregon plants and related natural history than to edit the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Now it is time for me to move on, but +rst I o*er thanks to those before me who started the journal and those who worked with me: the FEJUPSJBMCPBSENFNCFST UIFBVUIPSTXIPTIBSFEUIFJSFYQFSUJTF UIFSFWJFXFST BOEUIF4UBUF#PBSETXIPTVQQPSUFENZXPSL* especially thank those who will follow me to keep this journal &ôùĄÿĂ$JOEZ3PDIÏ 1I% in print, to whom I also o*er my +les of pending manuscripts, UIFTFSWJDFTPGBOFYQFSJFODFEQBHFTFUUFS BSFMJBCMFQSJOUFSBOE &ôùĄÿĂùñü#ÿñĂô mailing service, and the opportunity of a lifetime: editing our +ne journal, Kalmiopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers Near Boise Cascade (Wenas) Campground (In the Upper
    Wildflowers Near Boise Cascade (Wenas) Campground (in the upper Wenas Valley) Boise Cascade Lands Yakima County, WA from a trip held May 24, 2019 T16N R16E S3; T17N R16E S34, S35 Updated: December 13, 2019 Common Name Scientific Name Family Ferns and Horsetails ____ Fragile Fern Cystopteris fragilis Cystopteridaceae Monocots - Sedges, Rushes, Grasses & Herbaceous Wildflowers ____ Tapertip Onion Allium accuminatum Amaryllidaceae ____ Common Camas Camassia quamash (ssp. maxima ?) Asparagaceae ____ Douglas' Brodiaea Triteleia grandiflora v. grandiflora Asparagaceae ____ Elk Sedge Carex geyeri Cyperaceae ____ Grass Widows Olsynium douglasii v. douglasii Iridaceae ____ Sagebrush Mariposa Calochortus macrocarpus ssp. macrocarpus Liliaceae ____ Yellow Bells Fritillaria pudica Liliaceae ____ Panicled Deathcamas Toxicoscordion paniculatum Melanthiaceae ____ Meadow Deathcamas Toxicosordion venenosum Melanthiaceae ____ Common Western Needlegrass Achnatherum (occidentale ssp. pubescens ?) Poaceae ____ Field Meadow Foxtail Alopecurus pratensis Poaceae ____ Smooth Brome Bromus inermis Poaceae ____ Cheatgrass Bromus tectorum Poaceae ____ Onepike Oatgrass Danthonia unispicata Poaceae ____ Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus elymoides Poaceae ____ Bulbous Bluegrass Poa bulbosa Poaceae ____ Bluebunch Wheatgrass Pseudoroegenaria spicata v. spicata Poaceae Trees and Shrubs ____ Blue Elderberry Sambucus cerulea Adoxaceae ____ Stiff Sagebrush Artemisia rigida Asteraceae ____ Gray Rabbitbrush Ericameria nauseosa v. speciosa Asteraceae ____ Shining Oregon Grape Berberis aquifolium Berberidaceae ____ Mountain Alder Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia Betulaceae ____ Common Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus v. laevigatus Caprifoliaceae ____ Kinnikinnik Arctostaphylos nevadensis ssp. nevadensis Ericaceae ____ Wax Currant Ribes cereum v. cereum Grossulariaceae ____ Fir Abies amabilis or A. grandis Pinaceae ____ Ponderosa Pine Pinus ponderosa v. ponderosa Pinaceae ____ Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii v. menziesii Pinaceae ____ Snowbrush Ceanothus velutinus v.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Award Recipients
    2021 Charles Redd Center Award Recipients Notification and instruction emails will be sent out to all applicants with specifics Annaley Naegle Redd Assistantship Phil S. Allen, Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, “Sub-alpine Wildflower Meadows as a Template for Water-Conserving Landscape Design” Richard A. Gill, Biology, Brigham Young University, “Biocrust Controls over Regional Carbon Cycling on the Colorado Plateau” Randy Larsen, Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, “Mountain Lions (Puma concolor), Human Recreation, and the Wildland-Urban Interface: Improving Conservation of an Iconic Species Native to the West” Riley Nelson, Biology, Brigham Young University, “The Bee-Killers: Taxonomy and Phylogenetics of the Robber Fly Genus Proctacanthus (Insecta: Diptera: Asilidae) with Special Reference to Those of Western North America” Sam St. Clair, Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, “Wildfire and Drought Impacts on Plant Invasions in the Western United States” Annaley Naegle Redd Student Award in Women’s History Amy Griffin, Interdisciplinary (Communications), Brigham Young University, “The Impact of Female Role Models in Television Media on the Perceived Electability of Women” Emily Larsen, History, University of Utah, “Artistic Frontiers: Women and the Making of the Utah Art Scene, 1880– 1950” Charles Redd Fellowship Award in Western American History David R M Beck, Native American Studies, University of Montana, “‘Bribed with Our Own Money,’ Federal Misuse of Tribal Funds in the Termination
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for Pollinators in Oregon
    TECHNICAL NOTES U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Portland, Oregon March 2008 PLANT MATERIALS No. 13 PLANTS FOR POLLINATORS IN OREGON Kathy Pendergrass, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Portland, Oregon Mace Vaughan, Conservation Director, Xerces Society, Portland, Oregon Joe Williams, Manager, NRCS, Plant Materials Center, Corvallis, Oregon Left – honey bee on camas flower (Pendergrass) Right – bumble bee on rabbit brush (Vaughan) The purpose of this technical note is to provide information about establishing, maintaining and enhancing habitat and food resources for native pollinators, particularly for native bees, in Riparian buffers, Windbreaks, Hedgerows, Alley cropping, Field borders, Filter strips, Waterways, Range plantings and other NRCS practices. We welcome your comments for improving any of the content of this publication for future editions. Please contact us! PLANTS FOR POLLINATORS IN OREGON Native pollinators are a vital part of our environment. Pollinators are essential for the reproduction of native plants, as well as many crops. Pollinators include some bird and bat species and a wide array of insect species, but bees are the most important for our agricultural landscapes. Native bees are becoming more important pollinators for crop plants in light of recent challenges to honey bee keepers across the U.S., namely Colony Collapse Disorder and the variety of other ailments honey bees face. As a group, pollinators are threatened world-wide by habitat loss and fragmentation, pesticides, introduced diseases and parasites. Habitat enhancement for pollinators can also support other beneficial insects. For example, maintaining native sources of nectar and pollen, as well as protecting or establishing nest sites, provides important resources for other insects which might parasitize or predate upon harmful crop pests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae Through Cucurbitaceae)
    The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) by George W. Douglas1, Gerald B. Straley2 and Del Meidinger3 1 George Douglas 2 Gerald Straley 3 Del Meidinger 6200 North Road Botanical Garden Research Branch R.R.#2 University of British Columbia B.C. Ministry of Forests Duncan, B.C. V9L 1N9 6501 S.W. Marine Drive 31 Bastion Square Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Victoria, B. C. V8W 3E7 April 1989 Ministry of Forests THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) Contributors: Dr. G.W. Douglas, Douglas Ecological Consultants Ltd., Duncan, B.C. — Aceraceae through Betulaceae Brassicaceae (except Arabis, Cardamine and Rorippa) through Cucurbitaceae. Mr. D. Meidinger, Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. — Gymnosperms. Dr. G.B. Straley, Botanical Garden, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C. — Boraginaceae, Arabis and Rorippa. With the cooperation of the Royal British Columbia Museum and the Botanical University of British Columbia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Dr. G.A. Allen for providing valuable suggestions during the initial stages of the project. Thanks are also due to Drs. G.A. Allen, A. Ceska and F. Ganders for reviewing taxonomically difficult groups. Mrs. O. Ceska reviewed the final draft of Part 1. Mr. G. Mulligan kindly searched the DAO herbarium and provided information on Brassicaceae. Dr. G. Argus helped with records from CAN. Louise Gronmyr and Jean Stringer kindly typed most of the contributions and helped in many ways in the production of the final manuscript which was typeset by Beth Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Guilds of Bees in Sagebrush Steppe: Comparing Bee Usage Of
    ABSTRACT: Healthy plant communities of the American sagebrush steppe consist of mostly wind-polli- • nated shrubs and grasses interspersed with a diverse mix of mostly spring-blooming, herbaceous perennial wildflowers. Native, nonsocial bees are their common floral visitors, but their floral associations and abundances are poorly known. Extrapolating from the few available pollination studies, bees are the primary pollinators needed for seed production. Bees, therefore, will underpin the success of ambitious seeding efforts to restore native forbs to impoverished sagebrush steppe communities following vast Floral Guilds of wildfires. This study quantitatively characterized the floral guilds of 17 prevalent wildflower species of the Great Basin that are, or could be, available for restoration seed mixes. More than 3800 bees repre- senting >170 species were sampled from >35,000 plants. Species of Osmia, Andrena, Bombus, Eucera, Bees in Sagebrush Halictus, and Lasioglossum bees prevailed. The most thoroughly collected floral guilds, at Balsamorhiza sagittata and Astragalus filipes, comprised 76 and 85 native bee species, respectively. Pollen-specialists Steppe: Comparing dominated guilds at Lomatium dissectum, Penstemon speciosus, and several congenerics. In contrast, the two native wildflowers used most often in sagebrush steppe seeding mixes—Achillea millefolium and Linum lewisii—attracted the fewest bees, most of them unimportant in the other floral guilds. Suc- Bee Usage of cessfully seeding more of the other wildflowers studied here would greatly improve degraded sagebrush Wildflowers steppe for its diverse native bee communities. Index terms: Apoidea, Asteraceae, Great Basin, oligolecty, restoration Available for Postfire INTRODUCTION twice a decade (Whisenant 1990). Massive Restoration wildfires are burning record acreages of the The American sagebrush steppe grows American West; two fires in 2007 together across the basins and foothills over much burned >500,000 ha of shrub-steppe and 1,3 James H.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Windplant #1 Botanical Resources Field Survey Prepared for Klickitat County Planning Department Bonneville Power Admi
    WASHINGTON WINDPLANT #1 BOTANICAL RESOURCES FIELD SURVEY PREPARED FOR KLICKITAT COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION APPENDIX B to Washington Windplant #1 EIS DECEMBER 1994 I I Table of Contents I 1.0 Introduction . 1 2.0 Study Methods . 1 I 2.1 Study Objectives and Pre-Survey Investigations . 1 2.1.1 Pre-survey Investigations . 2 2.1.2 Special Status Plant Species . 2 I 2.1.3 Native Plant Communities . 2 2.1.4 Plant Species of Potential Cultural Importance . 3 2.1.5 Habitat Types . 3 I 2.2 Field Survey Methodology . 5 3.0 Field Survey Results . 5 I 3.1 Habitat Types in the Project Area . 5 3.2 Special-Status Plant Species in Surveyed Corridors . 7 3.3 High-Quality Native Plant Communities in Surveyed Corridors . 7 3.3.1 Douglas' buckwheat/Sandberg's bluegrass (Eriogonum douglasii/ I Poa secunda) Community . 7 3.3.2 Bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg's bluegrass (Agropyron spicatum- Poa secunda) Lithosolic Phase Community . 7 I 3.3.3 Bluebunch wheatgrass-Idaho fescue (Agropyron spicatum-Festuca idahoensis Community . 8 3.3.4 Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana)and Oregon white oak-ponderosa I pine (Q. garryana-Pinus ponderosa) Woodland Communities . 8 3.3.5 Other Communities . 8 3.4 Plant Species of Potential Cultural Importance . 9 I 3.5 Wetlands . 10 4.0 Project Impacts . 10 I 4.1 Impacts on Plant Communities . 10 4.1.1 Overview . 10 4.1.2 Douglas' buckwheat/Sandberg' s bluegrass (Eriogonum douglasii/ I Poa secunda) Community . 12 4.1.3 Bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg' s bluegrass (Agropyron spicatum- Poa secunda and bluebunch wheatgrass-Idaho fescue (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Sage Notes September 2018
    Vol. 40 No. 3 September 2018 Newsletter of the Idaho Native Plant Society ● Promoting Interest in Idaho’s Native Flora INPS 2018 Annual Meeting in the Coeur d'Alene Mountains By Derek Antonelli, President, Calypso Chapter The Idaho Native Plant Society’s 2018 Annual Derek Antonelli. The morning’s walk was through Meeting was held in the beautiful Coeur d’Alene Settler’s Grove of Ancient Cedars. This grove of Mountains from Friday, June 29, through giant western red cedars (Thuja plicata) has been Monday, July 2. Fifty-seven people registered for established since the time of Columbus. The grove the four-day event, hosted by the Calypso Chapter. experienced a forest fire in 2015, and it was inter- We staged activities out of the U.S. Forest Service esting to see how resilient this habitat was to the Bumblebee Campground Group Site along the effects of fire. The afternoon walk was up Coal Little North Fork of the Coeur d’Alene River. The Creek and provided a good example of the mesic focus of the event was John Leiberg, a Swedish- forests of north Idaho. The birders in our group American pioneering botanical collector, forester, were impressed by the American dippers being and bryologist. Leiberg was responsible for docu- very active in the creek. menting floras throughout the Pacific Northwest, Saturday evening incorporated the official por- but particularly north Idaho. tions of the Annual Meeting. The evening started Activities began Friday. As people checked in, off with a dinner catered by the Snake Pit, a com- they were given the opportunity to participate in a pany that has been in business since the 1880s plant scavenger hunt.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit E: Botanical and Wildlife Resources
    E5.0 BOTANICAL AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES This section on the terrestrial resources (plants and wildlife) associated with the Klamath Hydroelectric Project (Project) contains the following elements: • A description of the existing botanical and wildlife resources in the study area (see Figure E5.1-1) • A discussion of agency consultation related to terrestrial resources • Summaries of the studies conducted by PacifiCorp on wildlife and vegetation • A summary of proposed enhancement measures • A discussion of continuing impacts E5.1 HISTORICAL TERRESTRIAL RESOURCES The terrestrial resources in the Project vicinity historically have been affected by humans for a long period of time. Much of the information on Native American use of the Klamath River Canyon comes from the archaeological investigations conducted by Gleason (2001). Native Americans have been part of the Klamath River ecosystem for at least the last 7,500 years (Gleason, 2001). The Upland Takelma, Shasta, Klamath, and Modoc tribes all used various portions of the study area; the Yurok Tribe historically used the lands along the Lower Klamath River. Before settlement by Europeans, Native Americans affected terrestrial resources through clearing vegetation for villages; harvesting plants and animals for food, medicine, and other uses; and using fire to manage vegetation. The most intensive uses occurred close to the river. Apparently, many of the flat terraces in the canyon were used at one time or another as village- sized settlements. The existing Topsy Grade Road is near the site of a Native American trail. Beginning in about 1870, homesteaders established ranches in the Klamath River Canyon. Apparently, the canyon was mostly unoccupied by any Native American tribes after this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 8-2016 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon James S. Kagan Portland State University Sue Vrilakas Portland State University, [email protected] John A. Christy Portland State University Eleanor P. Gaines Portland State University Lindsey Wise Portland State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 130 pp. This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors James S. Kagan, Sue Vrilakas, John A. Christy, Eleanor P. Gaines, Lindsey Wise, Cameron Pahl, and Kathy Howell This book is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub/25 RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER August 2016 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751,
    [Show full text]
  • TAXONOMY Plant Family Species Scientific Name GENERAL
    ESRM PLANT PROTOCOL Plant Propagation Protocol for Crocidium Multicaule ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/CRMU.pdf North American Distribution Washington State Distribution North American Map from USDA-NRCS Plants Database. Washington State Map from E-Flora B.C.4 TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Asteraceae Common Name Aster Family Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Crocidium Multicaule Hook. 3 Varieties N/A at this time Sub-species N/A at this time Cultivar N/A at this time Common Synonym(s) None8 Common Name(s) Common spring gold,4 spring gold, gold star 3 Species Code (as per CRMU7 USDA Plants database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range Canada, Oregon, California, Washington Ecological distribution Found in dry, sun exposed areas. Tend to be in shrub-steppe regions.8 Climate and elevation Dry, low elevation5 range Local habitat and Found on either side of the Cascade crest.8 Species not in danger, abundance abundant.8 Plant strategy type / For wetter areas the successional status is early seral, while on drier successional stage areas with more sunlight the successional stage is climax.5 Plant characteristic General: This is a vascular plant, a dicot annual forb or herb 2 grows between 5-30 cm tall. Leaves: Have hair between leaves and trunk of plant but otherwise is hairless. The leaves towards the base of the pant are round while leaves on the stem tend to be thinner and switch off.5 Flower: 8 to 13 flowers anywhere between 4-10 mm in length. PROPAGATION DETAILS Garry oak Ecosystems Native Plant Propagation Guidelines Note: Information from other sources included as well Ecotype Dry areas with plentiful sun exposure like cliff ledges, and open rocky areas.5 Propagation Goal Plants Propagation Method Seed propagation5 Product Type N/A at this time.
    [Show full text]