DOCSLIB.ORG

Pesticide Standards Reference Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Techlab - Matériaux de référence certifiés et Equipements de laboratoire - www.techlab.fr Pesticide Standards Reference Guide AccuStandard® TECHLAB www.techlab.fr Tél. (33) 03 87 75 54 29 Techlab - Matériaux de référence certifiés et Equipements de laboratoire - www.techlab.fr Over 6,000 Standards from Abamectin to Ziram Welcome to AccuStandard's Pesticide Desk Reference Guide This guide includes the following for each individual Pesticide: ■ Chemical name ■ Structure ■ CAS number ■ Molecular formula ■ Molecular weight ■ Physical state Included for most: ■ Solvent solubility ■ Specific gravity ■ Melting or Boiling point ■ Flash point ■ Common Synonyms A CAS number index is included for easy reference on page 75. 700 pesticides are available as single component solutions and neats. Also included are standards for over 50 EPA and international methods. AccuStandard is recognized for the widest range of Reference Standards. Organics Inorganics ■ QC Standards ■ Explosives ■ ICP ■ PCBs ■ Fuels & Hydrocarbons ■ ICP/MS ■ PBDEs ■ Plastic Additives ■ AA ■ Dioxins ■ Allergens ■ Ion Chrom ■ PAHs ■ Dyes ■ EPA Methods ■ Pesticides ■ EPA Methods ■ Wet Chemistry ■ VOCs ■ Petrochemicals ■ OrganoMetallics ■ Phthalates (including 100 ASTM methods) ■ Custom Formulations and much more. Master Catalog © AccuStandard, Inc. 2010 TECHLAB www.techlab.fr Tél. (33) 03 87 75 54 29 Techlab - Matériaux de référence certifiés et Equipements de laboratoire - www.techlab.fr Table of Contents Individual Neats and Solutions 1-74 CAS Number Index 75 Triazines and Metabolites 76 Pesticide & Herbicide Kits 77 EPA Pesticide Method - Table of Content 78 CLPs 79 EPA Method 500 Series 79-88 EPA Method 600 Series 89-92 EPA Method 1300 Series 93 EPA Method 1600 Series 94-97 EPA Method 8000 Series 98-104 EU Methods and other Methodologies 105-108 ISO Guide 34 with Scope of Accredition 109-110 Contact us for Synthesis of rare Pesticides and Metabolites Visit our website to search for additional pesticide formulations or contact our Technical Service Department TECHLAB www.techlab.fr Tél. (33) 03 87 75 54 29 Techlab - Matériaux de référence certifiés et Equipements de laboratoire - www.techlab.fr Purchasing Pesticide Standards Buying an Analytical Reference Standard in Solution Rather than Making it from Neats Good scientific operations, and also many auditors, urge analytical chemists to purchase analytical reference standards from a manufacturer of standards that is accredited to ISO 17025. There are three reasons for this: 1. Safety - Using solutions rather than neats reduces the laboratory personnel’s intensity and frequency of exposure to chemicals. The less time a person is exposed to chemicals, the less risk for accidents. Further, neats are usually not fully consumed in a single use, rather, they are partially used, then stored, and then used again. This increases the potential for exposure from the chemical (as well as the risk of contamination, cost of expired dates and disposal and other risks). 2. Certification - AccuStandard is accredited to quality certifications including ISO 9001:2008, ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO Guide 34 for producing and certifying chemical reference standards. In addition, the customer’s ISO certification and laboratory procedures often require that an independent party manufacture calibration standards (rather than being manufactured by the customer’s laboratory). This promotes sound scientific conclusions and true independence of standards. 3. Savings - Even if a larger amount of a neat is the same price as the same chemical in solution, using the neat compound is not cheaper than using solutions. Dilution and sample preparation time is required. Purchasing Neat Pesticides There are two ways to purchase neat standards: 1) exact weight and 2) nominal weight. With exact weight, the standards will ship with the exact weight (to 3 significant figures) taped on the label over the nominal weight. For example, the label on a vial of 5 milligrams of a neat will have the nominal weight (5 mg) printed on the label. Over it will be taped the printout from the balance indicating the exact weight (for example, 0.005 g). There is a small additional charge for this service. To order, indicate on the order “X-WT” as a separate line item under the catalog number of the neat you wish to purchase. If “X-WT” is not specified on the order, the neat standards ship with a nominal weight shown on the label. AccuStandard routinely overfills each vial by up to 10%. Tranfering Small Amounts of Neats, the procedure is as follows: 1. Wipe the outside of the vial (containing the Standard) clean and dry (including the cap). 2. Weigh the entire unit on an analytical balance. Record the weight to the nearest 0.1 mg. 3. Carefully transfer the contents to a volumetric flask using a suitable solvent. Rinse the cap and vial several times to assure a complete transfer. 4. Dry inside and outside of the vial and cap with mild heat or inert gas. 5. Weigh the empty dry vial and cap on the same analytical balance to the nearest 0.1 mg. The difference is amount of material transferred. TECHLAB www.techlab.fr Tél. (33) 03 87 75 54 29 Techlab - Matériaux de référence certifiés et Equipements de laboratoire - www.techlab.fr Pesticide Standards P-615 - Abamectin Abamectin Acetamiprid Acifluorfen methyl ester P-820 - Acetamiprid H H3C N-((6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl)-N’-cyano-N- Methyl 5-(2-Chloro-alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-P-246 - Acifluorfen methyl ester H H CH3 H HO R OH O O methylethanimidamide o-tolyloxy)-2-nitrobenzoate O O O H CH3 CH3 H H H H H H CH3 O OCH3 OCH3 H3C + H H CN F3C N - O O N N O (i) R = CH(CH ) H 3 2 OH O CH3 O CH Cl N 3 C O CH Cl O (ii) R = H3C CH2CH3 H 3 H H CAS 135410-20-7 MFC10 HC1110ClNH114ClN4 MW 222.67 OH 3 C15H9ClF3NO5 PS S SOL H, D, AMol. SG Wt.: 1.33 222.67 g/cm MP 98 - 99 °C CAS 50594-67-7 MFMol. C 15Wt.:H9 ClF375.683NO5 MW 375.69 PS S SG 1.47 g/cm3 MP N/A BP 392 °C CAS 71751-41-2 MF C H O / C H O BP ~350 °C FP 167 °C 48 72 14 47 70 14 FP 191 °C MW 873.09 / 859.06 PS S SOL T, A, IPA Matrix Cat. No. Unit SG 1.18 g/cm3 MP 165 °C BP N/A FP >150 °C Matrix Cat. No. Unit 100 µg/mL in AcCN P-820S-CN 1 mL Matrix Cat. No. Unit Neat P-246N 10 mg Neat P-615N 10 mg P-465 - Acetochlor 100 µg/mL in MeOH P-246S 1 mL Acetochlor 100 µg/mL in MeOH P-615S 1 mL 2-Chloro-N-ethoxymethyl-6’-ethylacet-o-toluidide Acrinathrin CH3 Abate (S)-(alpha)-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (Z)-(1R,3S)-2,2- O dimethyl-3-[2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1-trifluoromethylethoxy- O,O,O’O’-TetramethylP-101 - Abate/Temephos O,O’-thiodi-p-phenylene P-842 - Acrinathrin carbonyl)vinyl]cyclopropanecarboxylate bis(phosphorothioate) Cl N CH3 H3C CH 3 O O CH H C O CF3 H H 3 3 H3C O C C C F3C CN S P O OSP CH O O 3 CAS 34256-82-1 MF C1414HH20ClNO20ClNO2 2 MW 269.77 C O Mol. Wt.: 269.77 3 O O PS L SOL MeOH, A, EA SG 1.12 g/cm MP 11 °C O H H H CH BP 172 °C FP N/A 3 C26H21F6NO5 S Matrix Cat. No. Unit Mol. Wt.: 541.44 CAS 101007-06-1 MF C H F NO MW 541.44 CAS 3383-96-8 MF C16H20O6P2S3 MW 466.47 Neat P-465N 10 mg 26 21 6 5 3 PS S SOL H, E, A SG 1.38 g/cm3 MP 81 °C PS S SOL H SG 1.32C 16g/cmH20O6P 2 SMP3 30 °C BP 120 °C FP N/A Mol. Wt.: 466.47 100 µg/mL in MeOH P-465S 1 mL BP ~230 °C FP >230 °C Matrix Cat. No. Unit Matrix Cat. No. Unit Neat P-101N 10 mg Acifluorfen ∆ 100 µg/mL in AcCN P-842S-CN 1 mL P-245 - Acifluorfen 100 µg/mL in MeOH P-101S 1 mL 5-(2-Chloro-alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-o-tolyloxy)- 2-nitrobenzoic acid Admiral see Pyriproxyfen Affirm see Abamectin Acarol see Bromopropylate O OH Agritox see Trichloronate Accent see Nicosulfuron F3C NO2 P-102 - Alachlor P-200 - Acephate Alachlor Acephate 2-Chloro-2’,6’-diethyl-N-methoxymethylacetanilide O,S-Dimethyl acetylphosphoramidothioate O O Cl CAS 50594-66-6 MF C H ClF NO MW 383.65 H3C Cl O C14H147ClF63NO53 5 O N O PS S SOL A, H SGMol. 1.47 Wt.: g/cm 361.663 MP 124 - 125 °C BP 422 °C FP 209 °C OP NH H3C CH3 Matrix Cat. No. Unit S Neat P-245N 10 mg CAS 15972-60-8 MF C H ClNO MW 269.77 C H14 ClNO20 2 100 µg/mL in MeOH P-245S 1 mL 3 14 20 2 CAS 30560-19-1 MF C4H10NO3PS MW 183.17 PS S SG 1.12 g/cmMol. MP Wt.: 39 269.77 - 42 °C BP 404 °C C34H10NO3PS PS S SG 1.35 g/cmMol. MPWt.: 88 183.17 °C BP N/A FP N/A 100 µg/mL in AcCN P-245S-CN 1 mL FP 198 °C Matrix Cat. No. Unit Matrix Cat. No. Unit Neat P-200N 10 mg Neat P-102N 10 mg 100 µg/mL in Acetone P-200S-A 1 mL 100 µg/mL in MeOH P-102S 1 mL Property Key Solubility Key (SOL) CAS Chemical Abstract A Acetone Service Number CN Acetonitrile (AcCN) MF Molecular Formula D Methlyene chloride MW Molecular Weight DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide PS Physical State EA Ethyl acetate ∆ Pesticides containing a carboxyl group will autoesterify (Solid, Liquid) H Hexane in MeOH.
Recommended publications
  • EMPENTHRIN Product-Type 18 (Insecticide)

    EMPENTHRIN Product-Type 18 (Insecticide)

    Regulation (EU) n°528/2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products Evaluation of active substances Assessment Report EMPENTHRIN Product-Type 18 (Insecticide) March 2019 (revised version) RMS = Belgium Competent EMPENTHRIN Assessment Authority Report: Report Belgium March 2018 Table of Contents 1 STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND PURPOSE ..................................................................... 3 1.1 PRINCIPLE OF EVALUATION ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 PROCEDURE FOLLOWED ............................................................................................................................ 3 2 OVERALL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 5 2.1 PRESENTATION OF THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE ............................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Identity, Physico-Chemical Properties & Methods of Analysis ...................................................... 5 2.1.2 Intended Uses and Efficacy ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1.3 Classification and Labelling ..........................................................................................................
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
  • Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA

    Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA

    Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net).
  • Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D

    Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D

    Weed Science 2010 58:351–354 Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D. Velini, Maria L. B. Trindade, Luis Rodrigo M. Barberis, and Stephen O. Duke* As all herbicides act on pathways or processes crucial to plants, in an inhibitory or stimulatory way, low doses of any herbicide might be used to beneficially modulate plant growth, development, or composition. Glyphosate, the most used herbicide in the world, is widely applied at low rates to ripen sugarcane. Low rates of glyphosate also can stimulate plant growth (this effect is called hormesis). When applied at recommended rates for weed control, glyphosate can inhibit rust diseases in glyphosate-resistant wheat and soybean. Fluridone blocks carotenoid biosynthesis by inhibition of phytoene desaturase and is effective in reducing the production of abscisic acid in drought-stressed plants. Among the acetolactate synthase inhibitors, sulfometuron-methyl is widely used to ripen sugarcane and imidazolinones can be used to suppress turf species growth. The application of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors can trigger plant defenses against pathogens. Glufosinate, a glutamine synthetase inhibitor, is also known to improve the control of plant diseases. Auxin agonists (i.e., dicamba and 2,4-D) are effective, low-cost plant growth regulators. Currently, auxin agonists are still used in tissue cultures to induce somatic embryogenesis and to control fruit ripening, to reduce drop of fruits, to enlarge fruit size, or to extend the harvest period in citrus orchards. At low doses, triazine herbicides stimulate growth through beneficial effects on nitrogen metabolism and through auxin-like effects. Thus, sublethal doses of several herbicides have applications other than weed control.
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries

    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries

    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
  • B Commission Regulation (Eu)

    B Commission Regulation (Eu)

    02010R0037 — EN — 29.09.2018 — 035.001 — 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document ►B COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 15, 20.1.2010, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EU) No 758/2010 of 24 August 2010 L 223 37 25.8.2010 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 759/2010 of 24 August 2010 L 223 39 25.8.2010 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 761/2010 of 25 August 2010 L 224 1 26.8.2010 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 890/2010 of 8 October 2010 L 266 1 9.10.2010 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 914/2010 of 12 October 2010 L 269 5 13.10.2010 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 362/2011 of 13 April 2011 L 100 26 14.4.2011 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 363/2011 of 13 April 2011 L 100 28 14.4.2011 ►M8 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2012 of 1 L 30 1 2.2.2012 February 2012 ►M9 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2012 of 1 L 30 4 2.2.2012 February 2012 ►M10 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 86/2012 of 1 L 30 6 2.2.2012 February 2012 ►M11 Commission
  • Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil

    Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil

    Acifluorfen Sorption, Degradation, and Mobility in a Mississippi Delta Soil L. A. Gaston* and M. A. Locke ABSTRACT repulsion effects, acifluorfen is sorbed by soil or soil Potential surface water and groundwater contaminants include her- constituents (Pusino et al., 1991; Ruggiero et al., 1992; bicides that are applied postemergence. Although applied to the plant Pusino et al., 1993; Gennari et al., 1994b; NeÁgre et al., canopy, a portion of any application reaches the soil either directly 1995; Locke et al., 1997). Although the extent of sorp- or via subsequent foliar washoff. This study examined sorption, degra- tion in soil is generally proportional to OC content dation, and mobility of the postemergence herbicide acifluorfen (5-[2- (Gennari et al., 1994b; NeÁgre et al., 1995; Locke et al., chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid) in Dundee 1997), sorption likely involves processes other than par- silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic, Aeric Ochraqualf) taken titioning between aqueous and organic matter phases. from conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) field plots. Homogeneous In particular, acifluorfen forms complexes with divalent surface and subsurface samples were used in the sorption and degrada- tion studies; intact soil columns (30 cm long and 10 cm diam.) were and trivalent cations (Pusino et al., 1991; Pusino et al., used in the mobility study. Batch sorption isotherms were nonlinear 1993) that may be sorbed or precipitated. Complex for- (Freundlich model) and sorption paralleled organic C (OC) content. mation and subsequent sorption may partially account All tillage by depth combinations of soil exhibited a time-dependent for increased acifluorfen sorption with decreasing soil approach to sorption equilibrium that was well described by a two- pH or increasing cation exchange capacity (Pusino et site equilibrium±kinetic model.
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) § 455.61

    40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) § 455.61

    § 455.61 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) from: the operation of employee show- § 455.64 Effluent limitations guidelines ers and laundry facilities; the testing representing the degree of effluent of fire protection equipment; the test- reduction attainable by the applica- ing and emergency operation of safety tion of the best available tech- showers and eye washes; or storm nology economically achievable water. (BAT). (d) The provisions of this subpart do Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 not apply to wastewater discharges through 125.32, any existing point from the repackaging of microorga- source subject to this subpart must nisms or Group 1 Mixtures, as defined achieve effluent limitations rep- under § 455.10, or non-agricultural pes- resenting the degree of effluent reduc- ticide products. tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi- § 455.61 Special definitions. cally achievable: There shall be no dis- Process wastewater, for this subpart, charge of process wastewater pollut- means all wastewater except for sani- ants. tary water and those wastewaters ex- § 455.65 New source performance cluded from the applicability of the standards (NSPS). rule in § 455.60. Any new source subject to this sub- § 455.62 Effluent limitations guidelines part which discharges process waste- representing the degree of effluent water pollutants must meet the fol- reduction attainable by the applica- lowing standards: There shall be no dis- tion of the best practicable pollut- charge of process wastewater pollut- ant control technology (BPT). ants. Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point § 455.66 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).
  • Report Name:Ukraine's Mrls for Veterinary Drugs

    Report Name:Ukraine's Mrls for Veterinary Drugs

    Voluntary Report – Voluntary - Public Distribution Date: November 05,2020 Report Number: UP2020-0051 Report Name: Ukraine's MRLs for Veterinary Drugs Country: Ukraine Post: Kyiv Report Category: FAIRS Subject Report Prepared By: Oleksandr Tarassevych Approved By: Robin Gray Report Highlights: Ukraine adopted several maximum residue levels (MRLs) for veterinary drugs, coccidiostats and histomonostats in food products of animal origin. Ukraine also adopted a list of drugs residues that are not allowed in food products. THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY The Office of Agricultural Affairs of USDA/Foreign Agricultural Service in Kyiv, Ukraine prepared this report for U.S. exporters of domestic food and agricultural products. While every possible care was taken in the preparation of this report, information provided may not be completely accurate either because policies have changed since the time this report was written, or because clear and consistent information about these policies was not available. It is highly recommended U.S. exporters verify the full set of import requirements with their foreign customers, who are normally best equipped to research such matters with local authorities, before any goods are shipped. This FAIRS Subject Report accompanies other reports on Maximum, Residue Limits established by Ukraine in 2020. Related reports could be found under the following links: 1.) Ukraine's MRLs for Microbiological Contaminants_Kyiv_Ukraine_04-27-2020 2.) Ukraine's MRLs for Certain Contaminants_Kyiv_Ukraine_03-06-2020 Food Products of animal origin and/or ingredients of animal origin are not permitted in the Ukrainian market if they contain certain veterinary drugs residues in excess of the maximum residue levels established in Tables 1 and 2.
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES

    INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES

    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
  • Degradation of Benthiocarb in Soils As Affected by Soil Conditions*

    Degradation of Benthiocarb in Soils As Affected by Soil Conditions*

    J. Pesticide Sci. 2, 7-16 (1977) Degradation of Benthiocarb in Soils as Affected by Soil Conditions* Yasuo NAKAMURA, ** Kanji ISHIKAWA** and Shozo KUWATSUKA Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464, Japan (Received May 22, 1976) Some factors affecting the degradation of 14C-benthiocarb (S-4-chlorobenzylN, N- diethylthiocarbamate) labelled at the benzene-ring in soils were studied. The degra- dation rates of 14C-benthiocarb in three different soils under upland, oxidative flooded and reductive flooded conditions were compared. 14C-Benthiocarb wasrapidly degraded under oxidative conditions, but slowly under reductive conditions. Very small differences in the degradation rates were observed among different soils. Under oxidative conditions 14C-carbon dioxide was liberated remarkably with the degrada- tion of 14C-benthiocarb. The degradation was remarkably retarded by sterilizing the soils. The repeated application of benthiocarb, or its incorporation into the soil with simetryne, CNP or propanil had no significant effect on the degradation rate. Benthiocarb (Saturn(R),S-4-chlorobenzyl N, N-diethylthiolcarbamate), alone or in combing MATERIALS AND METHODS tion with simetryne, prometryne and CNP, is 1. Chemicals extensively used to control weeds mainly in 14C-Benthiocarb labelled at the benzene-ring paddy fields. was used as in the previous study. U The In the previous paper, ' the persistence of specific activity was 3. 21 mCi/mmole and the benthiocarb and its degradation products in radioactive purity was more than 99%. Non- a soil were reported, and its degradation path- radioactive pure chemicals were also described ways were also proposed. The behavior of the in the previous reports.
  • Appendix a Analysis of Products with Two Or More Active Ingredients

    Appendix a Analysis of Products with Two Or More Active Ingredients

    APPENDIX A ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS WITH TWO OR MORE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS The Agency does not routinely include, in its risk assessments, an evaluation of mixtures of active ingredients, either those mixtures of multiple active ingredients in product formulations or those in the applicator’s tank. In the case of the product formulations of active ingredients (that is, a registered product containing more than one active ingredient), each active ingredient is subject to an individual risk assessment for regulatory decision regarding the active ingredient on a particular use site. If effects data are available for a formulated product containing more than one active ingredient, they may be used qualitatively or quantitatively1 2. There are no product LD50 values, with associated 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) available for glyphosate. As discussed in USEPA (2000) a quantitative component-based evaluation of mixture toxicity requires data of appropriate quality for each component of a mixture. In this mixture evaluation an LD50 with associated 95% CI is needed for the formulated product. The same quality of data is also required for each component of the mixture. Given that the formulated products for glyphosate do not have LD50 data available it is not possible to undertake a quantitative or qualitative analysis for potential interactive effects. However, because the active ingredients are not expected to have similar mechanisms of action, metabolites, or toxicokinetic behavior, it is reasonable to conclude that an assumption of dose-addition would be inappropriate. Consequently, an assessment based on the toxicity of glyphosate is the only reasonable approach that employs the available data to address the potential acute risks of the formulated products.