Proposed Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Site Selection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proposed Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Site Selection P ROPOSED D WIGHT D. E ISENHOWER M EMORIAL S ITE S ELECTION E NVIRONMENTAL A SSESSMENT Washington, D.C. Responsible Federal Agency: Prepared in Association With: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE J UNE 2006 P ROPOSED D WIGHT D. E ISENHOWER M EMORIAL S ITE S ELECTION E NVIRONMENTAL A SSESSMENT Washington, D.C. Responsible Federal Agency: National Park Service (NPS) Prepared in association with: Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission (EMC) Cooperating Agencies: National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) General Services Administration (GSA) Abstract: The National Park Service and the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission have prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the establishment of a national memorial to Dwight D. Eisenhower on the preferred site of Maryland Avenue, SW at Independence Avenue between 4th and 6th Streets, SW near the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. This EA identifies the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Alternative, the development of the preferred site of the Eisenhower Memorial (not yet designed), together with a No Action Alternative. Recommended mitigation measures are provided for the Proposed Alternative. The NPS has prepared this EA consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA [40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1500-1508 (1986)], as amended, National Park Service (NPS) Director’s Order #12 (DO-12), and Public Law (PL) 99-652 (the Commemorative Works Act of 1986), PL 106-79, and PL 107-117. In conjunction with this EA, this proposed memorial is undergoing a review of potential effects on historic resources consistent with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The current status of the ongoing Section 106 consultation process is summarized in this EA. Send direct comments on the EA to: Glenn DeMarr at NPS Email: [email protected] Fax: 202-619-7420 PEPC: http://parkplanning.nps.gov/nama J UNE 2006 Rocco C. Siciliano Representative Dennis Moore Chairman D/Kansas Senator Daniel K. Inouye Representative Jerry Moran D/Hawaii R/Kansas Vice Chairman Representative Mac Thornberry Senator Jack Reed R/Texas D/Rhode Island D. David Eisenhower Senator Pat Roberts R/Kansas Alfred Geduldig Senator Ted Stevens Susan Banes Harris R/Alaska Representative Leonard L. Boswell D/Iowa DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER MEMORIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION 3.2 Cultural Resources....................................................3-9 3.2.1 Archaeological Resources ............................3-9 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................1-1 3.2.2 Historic Resources .....................................3-10 1.2 Project Background ..................................................1-4 3.2.3 Visual Resources ........................................3-12 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action .............1-6 1.4 Relevance of Eisenhower to the Preferred Site.........1-7 3.3 Transportation Systems ..........................................3-18 1.5 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination ......1-11 3.3.1 Roadways and Intersections…………........3-18 1.6 Environmental Issues Considered ..........................1-12 3.3.2 Vehicular Traffic………….........................3-20 1.7 Cumulative Relationship to Nearby Projects .........1-12 3.3.3 Parking…………........................................3-23 3.3.4 Transit Systems...........................................3-25 3.3.5 Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation....................3-27 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 3.4 Physical and Natural Resources .............................3-29 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................2-1 3.4.1 Air Quality..................................................3-29 2.2 Background on the Memorial Site Selection ...........2-1 3.4.2 Noise Levels................................................3-29 2.3 Roadway Configuration Alternatives ……………...2-9 3.4.3 Water Resources.........................................3-30 2.4 Proposed Alternative .............................................2-15 3.4.4 Geophysical Resources...............................3-32 2.5 No Action Alternative ............................................2-20 3.4.5 Biological Resources..................................3-34 3.5 Urban Systems .......................................................3-36 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.5.1 Utilities........................................................3-36 3.5.2 Solid Waste ................................................3-38 3.1 Socio-Economic Resources .....................................3-1 3.5.3 Hazardous Materials and Waste .................3-38 3.1.1 Land Use and Ownership .............................3-1 3.1.2 Planning Policies ..........................................3-3 3.1.3 Community Facilities……………………....3-7 3.1.4 Visitation.......................................................3-8 3.1.5 Economic and Fiscal Resources....................3-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS i DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER MEMORIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 5.0 APPENDIX 4.1 Socio-Economic Resources......................................4-1 5.1 References 4.1.1 Land Use and Ownership..............................4-1 5.2 Preparers 4.1.2 Planning Policies...........................................4-3 5.3 Distribution List 4.1.3 Community Facilities....................................4-4 5.4 Traffic Impact Study Summary Table 4.1.4 Visitation.......................................................4-4 5.5 List of Acronyms 4.1.5 Economic and Fiscal Resources....................4-5 5.6 EMC Site Selection Report (Referenced) 4.2 Cultural Resources....................................................4-6 4.2.1 Archaeological Resources.............................4-6 4.2.2 Historic Resources........................................4-7 4.2.3 Visual Resources...........................................4-8 4.3 Transportation Systems...........................................4-11 4.3.1 Roadways and Intersections .......................4-11 4.3.2 Vehicular Traffic ........................................4-12 4.3.3 Parking ......................................................4-15 4.3.4 Transit Systems...........................................4-17 4.3.5 Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation....................4-17 4.4 Physical and Natural Resources..............................4-19 4.4.1 Air Quality..................................................4-19 4.4.2 Noise Levels................................................4-20 4.4.3 Water Resources.........................................4-21 4.4.4 Geophysical Resources...............................4-22 4.4.5 Biological Resources..................................4-23 4.5 Urban Systems ........................................................4-25 4.5.1 Utilities........................................................4-25 4.5.2 Solid Waste ................................................4-27 4.5.3 Hazardous Materials and Waste .................4-27 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER MEMORIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LIST OF FIGURES 1-1 Project Location Map................................................1-2 1-2 Preferred Site and Surrounding Area .......................1-3 1-3 Thematic Context of the Preferred Site ....................1-8 2-1 Boundaries of Memorial Areas I and II ...................2-2 2-2 Map of Sites Considered for the Memorial Site ......2-6 2-3 Memorials and Museum Master Plan Roadway Alternative...............................................................2-11 2-4 MD Avenue Dominant Roadway Alternative.........2-14 2-5 Aerial Photograph of Preferred Memorial Site ......2-16 2-6 Development Framework for the Preferred Memorial Site .........................................................................2-19 3-1 Surrounding Uses of the Preferred Memorial Site ...3-2 3-2 Property Ownership of the Preferred Memorial Site 3-4 3-3 Roadways of the Preferred Memorial Site .............3-19 3-4 Parking and Roadway Circulation ........................3-24 3-5 Transit Access to the Preferred Memorial Site ......3-26 3-6 Utility Diagram of the Preferred Memorial Site ....3-37 4-1 Trip Distribution and Assignment ..........................4-11 LIST OF TABLES 2-1 Sites Considered for the Eisenhower Memorial .......2-5 3-1 Roadway Traffic Volumes......................................3-20 3-2 Existing Peak Traffic Volumes...............................3-21 3-2 2006 ADT Volumes and Roadway Capacity..........3-22 4-1 Peak Traffic on Maryland Avenue Segment...........4-12 TABLE OF CONTENTS iii SECTION 1.0 P URPOSE AND N EED DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER MEMORIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION The memorial’s location “within Area I as depicted on the map referred to in section 8908(a) of title 40” was approved upon the 1.1 Introduction enactment of Public Law 109-220 on May 5, 2006. The NPS, in association with the EMC, has prepared this EA consistent with The National Park Service (NPS) and the Eisenhower Memorial the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as Commission (EMC) propose to establish a national memorial to amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Dwight D. Eisenhower on a site located at Maryland and regulations implementing NEPA [40 Code of Federal Independence Avenues in southwest Washington, D.C. (see Regulations (CFR) 1500-1508 (1986)], as amended, and National Figure 1-1). The EMC, created in
Recommended publications
  • Air and Space Museum to Undergo Major Construction
    January 2018 Circulation 13,000 FREE PAUL "SOUTH" TAYLOR DESERVES HIS PRAISE Page 2 CIRCULATOR Coming Back to SW? Page 3 Air and Space Museum to Undergo Major Construction OP-ED: he first major construction project years. • $250 million: fundraising goal AMIDON IS THE for the Air and Space Museum will • All 23 galleries and presentation spac- • 1,441: newly displayed artifacts T start this summer. es will be transformed. • 7: years scheduled for completion PLACE TO BE • The museum is raising $250 mil- • 0: days closed for construction The facts: lion through private donations to fund The museum has released artist ren- Page 4 • This is the first major construction the future galleries. derings highlighting the exciting changes project for the building in Southwest • The project also includes the complete to come. These renderings (above) rep- Washington, DC, since its opening 41 re-facing of the exterior stone, replace- resent the first nine galleries scheduled years ago. ment of outdated mechanical systems, for renovation. New galleries will be orga- • Visitors will start seeing changes to the and other improvements supported by nized by theme, helping you find your museum in summer 2018. federal funding. favorite stories and make connections COMMUNITY • The museum will remain open through across eras. the project by dividing the construction By the numbers: All information and images courtesy of CALENDAR into two major phases. • 13,000 – stone slabs replaced the Smithsonian National Air and Space • The project is scheduled to take seven • 23: new galleries or presentation spaces Museum. Page 6 MRS. THURGOOD MARSHALL & HER HUSBAND Page 8 FIND US ONLINE AT THESOUTHWESTER.COM, OR @THESOUTHWESTER @THESOUTHWESTER /THESOUTHWESTERDC Published by the Southwest Neighborhood Assembly, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites Street Address Index
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES STREET ADDRESS INDEX UPDATED TO OCTOBER 31, 2014 NUMBERED STREETS Half Street, SW 1360 ........................................................................................ Syphax School 1st Street, NE between East Capitol Street and Maryland Avenue ................ Supreme Court 100 block ................................................................................. Capitol Hill HD between Constitution Avenue and C Street, west side ............ Senate Office Building and M Street, southeast corner ................................................ Woodward & Lothrop Warehouse 1st Street, NW 320 .......................................................................................... Federal Home Loan Bank Board 2122 ........................................................................................ Samuel Gompers House 2400 ........................................................................................ Fire Alarm Headquarters between Bryant Street and Michigan Avenue ......................... McMillan Park Reservoir 1st Street, SE between East Capitol Street and Independence Avenue .......... Library of Congress between Independence Avenue and C Street, west side .......... House Office Building 300 block, even numbers ......................................................... Capitol Hill HD 400 through 500 blocks ........................................................... Capitol Hill HD 1st Street, SW 734 .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 No. 4 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was and our debates, that You would be re- OFFICE OF THE CLERK, called to order by the Speaker pro tem- vealed and exalted among the people. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, pore (Mr. SWALWELL). We pray these things in the strength Washington, DC, January 5, 2021. of Your holy name. Hon. NANCY PELOSI, f Speaker, House of Representatives, Amen. DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Washington, DC. PRO TEMPORE f DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- THE JOURNAL of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representa- fore the House the following commu- tives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed nication from the Speaker: The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- envelope received from the White House on ant to section 5(a)(1)(A) of House Reso- January 5, 2021 at 5:05 p.m., said to contain WASHINGTON, DC, January 6, 2021. lution 8, the Journal of the last day’s a message from the President regarding ad- I hereby appoint the Honorable ERIC proceedings is approved. ditional steps addressing the threat posed by SWALWELL to act as Speaker pro tempore on applications and other software developed or f this day. controlled by Chinese companies. With best wishes, I am, NANCY PELOSI, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The GW Law Student's Housing Guide
    The GW Law Student’s Housing Guide: Created by Students for Students A publication of the GW Law Student Ambassadors The George Washington University Law School Washington, D.C. Table of Contents WASHINGTON, D.C. Foggy Bottom and the Surrounding Area ..............................................................4 Adams Morgan ...........................................................................................................18 Capitol Hill ...................................................................................................................19 Cleveland Park/Woodley Park ................................................................................20 Columbia Heights .....................................................................................................21 Downtown ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22 Dupont Circle �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������23 Georgetown ...............................................................................................................24 Logan Circle ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25 Tenleytown/American University ............................................................................26 U Street �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������27 Van Ness ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������28
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Exciting Neighborhood in the History of the Nation's Capital
    where DC meets waterfront experiences The Most Exciting Neighborhood in the History of the Nation’s Capital The Wharf is reestablishing Washington, DC, as a true DINE, SEE A SHOW & SHOP AT THE WHARF waterfront city and destination. This remarkable mile-long The best in dining and entertainment are finding a new home at neighborhood along the Washington Channel of the Potomac The Wharf, which offers more than 20 restaurants and food River brings dazzling water views, hot new restaurants, year- concepts from fine dining to casual cafes and on-the-go round entertainment, and waterside style all together in one gourmet on the waterfront. The reimagined Wharf stays true to inspiring location. The Wharf, situated along the District of its roots with the renovation and expansion of DC’s iconic Columbia’s Southwest Waterfront just blocks south of the Municipal Fish Market, the oldest continuously operating fish National Mall, is easily accessible to the region. Opened in market in the US. In addition, The Wharf features iconic shops October 2017, The Wharf features world-class residences, and convenient services including Politics and Prose, District offices, hotels, shops, restaurants, cultural, private event, Hardware and Bike, Anchor on board with West Marine, Harper marina, and public spaces, including waterfront parks, Macaw, and more. promenades, piers, and docks. Phase 2 delivers in 2022. The Wharf is also becoming DC’s premier entertainment EXPLORE THE WHARF destination. The entertainment scene is anchored by The Anthem, a concert and events venue with a variable capacity The Wharf reconnects Washington, DC, to its waterfront from 2,500 to 6,000 people that is operated by IMP, owners of on the Potomac River.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotels Nearby
    HOTELS NEARBY Washington Marriott at Metro Center ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 775 12th St NW, Washington, DC 20005 Settle in to one of our beautifully appointed rooms and suites, which showcase deluxe bedding and views of D.C. Closest metro station: Metro Center Just a short metro ride to the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center Visit website InterContinental The Willard ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1401 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004 Elegant landmark property featuring an ornate lobby, an acclaimed bar, fine dining & a luxe spa. Closest metro station: Metro Center Walking distance to the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center Visit website JW Marriott Hotel ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1331 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004 Understated rooms & suites in an upscale hotel with a casual grill & a lounge, plus an indoor pool. Closest metro station: Federal Triangle Walking distance to the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center View website Hyatt Place Washington D.C./White House ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1522 K St NW, Washington, D.C., 20005 Hyatt Place Washington DC/White House features a rooftop bar with views of the city and a 24-hour fitness center. Each room at Washington DC Hyatt Place offers a 42” flat- screen HDTV, a sofa bed and a refrigerator. Closest metro station: Farragut West (Orange, Blue, Silver); Farragut North (Red) Walking distance to the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center View website Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 815 14th Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20005 All rooms and suites have been recently renovated with modern décor, and boast amenities including complimentary WiFi, an ergonomic desk chair, Garden Sleep System™ bed, refrigerator and microwave.
    [Show full text]
  • White House U.S
    Connecticut Department To Farragut West of Veterans To McPherson Square Metro station Ave Affairs Metro station blue, orange, and silver lines St. John’s blue, orange, and silver lines 16th Street Church Ave Vermont H Street Decatur Von Steuben Kosciuszko House statue statue White House U.S. Court of Historical LAFAYETTE Appeals and Association Baruch U.S. Court Bench of of Claims New Executive Inspiration Jackson Office Building statue White House Conference Pennsylvania Ave PARK Center Treasury Jackson Place Renwick Blair-Lee Rochambeau Lafayette Madison Place Annex Gallery House statue statue New York Ave Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest Northeast Gate Gate Gallatin G Street NORTH LAWN statue G Street To Metro Center Metro station blue, orange, silver, and red lines Dwight D. Eisenhower Department 17th Street Executive Office of the Treasury 15th Street Building White House Liberty Bell Replica F Street F Street East Executive Park West Executive Ave West To SOUTH Octagon Hamilton House statue Pennsylvania Ave State Place Alexander Hamilton North Southwest Southeast Gate Place New York Ave Gate Enter here for tours by SHERMAN reservation only First Division PERSHING PARK Monument Sherman statue To Federal Triangle Corcoran Metro station Gallery of Art LAWN blue, orange, and PARK silver lines E Street E Street Pennsylvania Ave E Street South Butt–Millet Ellipse Visitor American Fountain Pavilion White House Visitor Center National Zero Red Cross Milestone Enter under blue awnings National Christmas Tree D Street Daughters of Boy Scout the American Memorial Revolution ELLIPSE Original Patentees C Street Memorial Department of Commerce Organization of American States Second Division Bulfinch Memorial Bulfinch Gatehouse Gatehouse Haupt Fountains Haupt Fountains To Lincoln and To Smithsonian Vietnam Veterans Institution Memorials Constitution Avenue Lock To World War II, To Washington Monument Keepers F.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY OFFICE MONTHLY November 2017
    (305) 503-9077 FAMILY OFFICE MONTHLY November 2017 Upcoming Family Office Conferences in 2017-18 Family Office Super Summit elcome to the November edition of Family Office Monthly. We are gearing up for th W the biggest family office conference of the year: the annual Family Office Super December 5-6 , 2017 Summit in Miami, Florida. For four years, the Family Office Super Summit has been the Miami, FL largest gathering of family offices, high-net-worth individuals, and institutional investors. Leading into North America's premier art festival, Art Basel, this family office conference is www.FamilyOffices.com/ an unparalleled opportunity to hear from the leaders in this industry--while enjoying all of Super Miami's luxury and charms. Capital Raising If you plan on attending our upcoming conferences, especially next month's Family Office Bootcamps Super Summit, we encourage you to RSVP as a Charter Member in the new login platform online at www.FamilyOffices.com/Login. If you are not yet a Charter Member, be sure and visit www.FamilyOffices.com/Association to learn why membership keeps growing year February 2017: after year. Houston, TX Synovus Hires Exec to Lead High-Earners in NY and CT Chicago, IL Family Office Unit Consider Moving South Synovus has made a major acquisition to lead In the simmering controversy over tax Miami, FL its family office arm: Jamie Nicholson. reform (or tax cuts), few are shedding tears Atlanta, GA Nicholson comes from Truxton Trust, where for hedge fund managers and other high- she worked for ten years advising high-net- earners that might have to pay more under worth clients on complex..Page 2 an altered tax code.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2012 · Volume 5, Issue 3
    Park News National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper of National Mall and Memorial Parks March 2012 · Volume 5, Issue 3 Activities 2 Cherry Blossom Festival 4 Plan Your Visit 8 Cherry Blossom Centennial Cherry Tree Rebellion Ranger Brad Berger Ranger JoAnn Garcia arch 27, 2012 marks the 100th anniversary isitors strolling to the Thomas Jefferson Me- Mof the ceremonial planting of Japanese Vmorial along the Tidal Basin when the cherry flowering cherry trees along the Tidal Basin by trees are in full bloom enjoy a spectacular view. First Lady Helen Taft and the Viscountess Chinda, Yet the story behind the scenery and the memorial wife of the Japanese Ambassador. From her first is filled with turmoil and controversy. Loud pro- visit to Japan in 1885, noted authority on Asian tests against the building of the memorial and the culture and newspaper correspondent Eliza R. removal of the cherished trees resulted in a great Scidmore advocated the planting of such trees battle by several Washingtonians. in the nation’s capital. The years turned into In 1912, First Lady Helen Taft and the Vis- decades in her quest to beautify the city. Despite countess Chinda, wife of the Japanese Ambassa- her lack of success, this was a formative time for dor, planted the first two Yoshino cherry trees on Washington, D.C., as a series of damaging floods the north end of the Tidal Basin. Originally there underscored the need for dredging the Potomac city we know today. The city, taking its cue from were 3,020 cherry trees of 12 different varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones of the National Mall
    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Waterfront Redevelopment
    SOUTHWEST WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT STAGE 2 PUD – PHASE I HOFFMAN-STRUEVER WATERFRONT, L.L.C. APPLICATION TO THE D.C. ZONING COMMISSION FOR A SECOND STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STATEMENT OF THE APPLICANT February 3, 2012 Submitted by: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 2099 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-3000 Norman M. Glasgow, Jr. Mary Carolyn Brown ZONING COMMISSION Counsel for the Applicant District of Columbia ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 11-03A District of Columbia CASE NO.11-03A 2 EXHIBIT NO.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE .......................................................................................................................................... iii DEVELOPMENT TEAM ...................................................................................................................... v LIST OF EXHIBITS ........................................................................................................................... viii I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 A. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 B. The Applicant and Development Team .......................................................................... 2 II. APPROVED STAGE 1 PUD DEVELOPMENT PARAMETER ............................................................. 4 III. PROPOSED VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-2009 Town Report
    2 2008 2009 0 0 East Windsor 8 Connecticut / 2 0 0 9 ANNUAL REPORT NOTES ABOUT EAST WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT ________________________________________________ ast Windsor was originally settled by farmers in the 17th Century. They were drawn by the even topography and fertile soils of the Connecticut River Val- ________________________________________________ ley. Even today, farming makes up a significant part of our economy. In fact, ________________________________________________ the character of East Windsor is derived from the agricultural land and open Espace which lends our town its rural charm. We are comprised of five villages, Broad ________________________________________________ Brook, Melrose, Scantic, Warehouse Point, and Windsorville. While combined for gov- ________________________________________________ ernment and education convenience, each village is able to retain its own unique identity. ________________________________________________ With a population approaching 10,000, and a land area of 26.3 square miles, East ________________________________________________ Windsor also offers ample opportunity for business and industry to grow. Situated on ________________________________________________ the east side of the Connecticut River, our town lies nearly equal distance between Hartford, Connecticut and Springfield, Massachusetts. We are located minutes from ________________________________________________ Bradley International Airport on Route 5 with fast and easy access to and from I-91. ________________________________________________
    [Show full text]