Project Proposal to the Adaptation Fund

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Proposal to the Adaptation Fund PROJECT PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Category: Regular Country: Namibia Title of Project: Community-based integrated farming systems for climate change adaptation Type of Implementing Entity: National Implementing Entity (NIE) Implementing Entity: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia (DRFN) Executing Entity: Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST) Amount of Financing Requested: USD 5,000,000 1 This comprehensively expanded version of an earlier proposal will assist vulnerable small-scale communal farmers in two regions of Namibia to implement adaptation actions and practices that strengthen their resilience and that of their farming systems to climate variability and change. The two regions, Omusati and Omaheke region, were selected to be models for climate change adaptation for other regions of the country. The proposed 5-year project has a budget of USD 5,000,000 and will be executed by Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST) with the Desert Research Foundation of Namibia (DRFN) as the Implementing Entity. The project approaches adaptation of the agricultural and natural resource-based sector in Namibia to climate change in a comprehensive manner that increases production efficiency and brings value-added products to market effectively, by investing in techniques, technologies and in people. At the community level, cross-cutting concepts are integrated to make communal farming systems more adaptive to climate change and variability. The project is expected to benefit indirectly approximately 22,658 or 13.5% of the total population in the selected constituencies of which 46.5 % are women, and 40% children. The primary focus of the proposed project is to strengthen the adaptive capacities of vulnerable communities, including women- headed households, and enhance resilience of their farming system to climate variability. The proposed project has three major components that complement and strengthen each other: • Component 1 entails improved ecosystem management by implementing climate- smart management and rehabilitation techniques that improve the fodder flow and ecological services provided by natural rangelands, thus making local pastoral and dry-land cropping communities more resilient against climate variability and change. • Component 2 entails the implementation of climate-smart production, management and value-addition techniques in local and regional crop and animal (wild game and livestock) production systems and value chains, to enhance the adaptive capacity of communities vulnerable to climate variability and change along the whole value chain. • Component 3 aims to strengthen the knowledge and skills of vulnerable communities required to adapt and become more resilient to climate change and variability, and the (operational) capacity of institutions to deliver services effectively, by building their capacity along the whole value chain(s) that they are involved in, as well as improve the capacity of institutions serving the farming sector to provide more effective services. Special care is taken to include marginalised communities in these interventions. If these interventions are successful in helping local communities in the two model regions adapt to climate change successfully, they can be rolled out to other regions of Namibia with a fair chance of success. In terms of impact, the proposed project is categorised as Category B, meaning that there are hardly any adverse environmental or social impacts. The project is also congruent to national developmental strategies and policies, and is considered to meet all the major outcomes of the Results Framework and the Environmental, Social and Gender principles of the Adaptation Fund. Furthermore, the project takes the Sustainable Development Goals into consideration, in particular Goal 15, which pertains to “managed forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss” and with special emphasis on Goal 5, regarding gender equality and empowerment of women-headed households. 2 Abbreviations and acronyms AF: Adaptation Fund AF RF: Adaptation Fund Results Framework AFOLU: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Uses (sector) AMTA: Agricultural Marketing and Trade Agency of Namibia CA: Conservation Agriculture CPP-ISLM: Country Pilot Partnership for Integrated Sustainable Land Management DA: Designated Authority DAPEES: Directorate of Agricultural Production, Extension and Engineering Services DoF: Directorate of Forestry DRFN: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia EE: Executing Entity ESG: Environmental, social and gender FA: Farmers’ Academy GCM: Global Climate Model GDP: Gross domestic product IPCC: Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change IPM: Integrated pest management ISLM: Integrated Sustainable Land Management LEDA: Local Economic Development Agency MAWF: Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry MET: Ministry of Environment and Tourism NCA: Northern Communal Areas NDP: National Development Plan NGO: Non-governmental organization NIE: National Implementing Entity NPC: National Planning Commission NRMPS: Namibia National Rangeland Management Policy and Strategy 3 NTA: Namibia Training Authority NUST: Namibia University of Science and Technology PC: Project Component PL: Project Leader PSU: Projects Services Unit RC: Regional Council SMEs: Small and medium-sized enterprises SRM: Sustainable rangeland management UNFCCC: United Nations Framework on Climate Change Convention VCF: Veterinary Cordon Fence 4 Contents PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION ................................ ...........................................................1 1. Socio-economic, climatic and environmental background ............................... 9 2. Climate change models and scenarios ............................................................... 10 3. The climate change-induced problem ................................................................. 13 4. Project location ..................................................................................................... 16 A. Project objectives ........................................................................................................23 B. Project components and financing ............................................................................28 C. Projected calendar .......................................................................................................34 PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION ...................................................................................... 35 A. Project components ....................................................................................................35 1. Component 1: Improve ecosystem management ............................................... 35 2. Component 2: Climate-Smart crop and animal production systems ................ 60 3. Component 3: Individual and Institutional capacity development .................... 82 B. Economic, social and environmental benefits ..........................................................92 C. Cost-effectiveness .....................................................................................................100 D. National sustainable development strategies ......................................................... 108 E. National technical standards .................................................................................... 111 G. Duplication with other funding sources ................................................................... 116 H. Learning and knowledge management .................................................................... 121 I. Consultative process ................................................................................................123 J. Sustainability of the project outcomes .................................................................... 136 K. Environmental and social impacts and risks ........................................................... 137 PART III: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................. 145 A. Arrangements for project implementation ............................................................... 145 B. Financial and project risk management ................................................................... 149 C. Environmental and social risk management ........................................................... 151 D. Monitoring and evaluation ........................................................................................153 5 E. Results framework .....................................................................................................157 F. Alignment with the Results Framework of the Adaptation Fund ........................... 163 G. Detailed budget ..........................................................................................................166 H. Disbursement schedule ............................................................................................ 177 I. References .................................................................................................................179 PART IV: ENDORSEMENT BY GOVERNMENT AND CERTIFICATION BY THE IMPLEMENTING ENTITY ....................................................................................... 183 ANNEXURES ......................................................................................................................... 184 6 Tables Table 1: Adverse effects of climate change on crop and livestock
Recommended publications
  • GUIDE to CIVIL SOCIETY in NAMIBIA 3Rd Edition
    GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA GUIDE TO 3Rd Edition 3Rd Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono and Naita Marowa PJ Rejoice Compiled by GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA 3rd Edition AN OVERVIEW OF THE MANDATE AND ACTIVITIES OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN NAMIBIA Compiled by Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono GUIDE TO CIVIL SOCIETY IN NAMIBIA COMPILED BY: Rejoice PJ Marowa and Naita Hishoono PUBLISHED BY: Namibia Institute for Democracy FUNDED BY: Hanns Seidel Foundation Namibia COPYRIGHT: 2018 Namibia Institute for Democracy. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means electronical or mechanical including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission of the publisher. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: K22 Communications/Afterschool PRINTED BY : John Meinert Printing ISBN: 978-99916-865-5-4 PHYSICAL ADDRESS House of Democracy 70-72 Dr. Frans Indongo Street Windhoek West P.O. Box 11956, Klein Windhoek Windhoek, Namibia EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.nid.org.na You may forward the completed questionnaire at the end of this guide to NID or contact NID for inclusion in possible future editions of this guide Foreword A vibrant civil society is the cornerstone of educated, safe, clean, involved and spiritually each community and of our Democracy. uplifted. Namibia’s constitution gives us, the citizens and inhabitants, the freedom and mandate CSOs spearheaded Namibia’s Independence to get involved in our governing process. process. As watchdogs we hold our elected The 3rd Edition of the Guide to Civil Society representatives accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Namibia (3)
    AFB/PPRC.17/14 18 September 2015 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Seventeenth Meeting Bonn, Germany, 6-7 October 2015 Agenda Item 6 i) PROPOSAL FOR NAMIBIA (3) AFB/PPRC.17/14 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (OPG, Annex 4) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Scraping the Pot”: San in Namibia Two Decades After Independence Bibliography
    Annex Annex A: Sites visited for the field research Region # of sites Sites Date Caprivi (eastern) 5 Marakavan, Bito, Waya Waya, Kyarecan and Mulanga 5-12 August 2012 Caprivi (western 4 Omega 1, Mushashane and Mushangara 23-31 October 2011 – i.e. Bwabwata National Park) Mashambo 31 May 2012 Kavango 4 Likwaterera and Wiwi 10-18 April 2012 Xeidang and Ndama 1-9 May 2012 Oshana 1 Okaukuejo 8-12 December 2011 Kunene 1 Outjo (Etosha Poort) 6-9 February 2012 Oshikoto 3 Oshivelo 16-20 July 2012 Tsintsabis and Farm Six (both visited twice) 16-18 April 2012 and 28-30 June 2012 Ohangwena 6 Ekoka and Ouholamo 22-29 April 2012 Oshikoha and Onane 21-28 May 2012 Omukukutu and Omiishi 18-25 June 2012 Omaheke 6 Skoonheid October 2011 Gobabis (Epako) 14-17 February 2012 Blouberg 2-5 April 2012 Corridors 13 and 17 3-9 June 2012 Otjinene 9-12 September 2012 Omusati 4 Okatseidhi and Amarika 3-10 July 2012 Okathakanguti and Okapya 18-26 September 2012 Otjozondjupa 8 Tsumkwe and Nyae Nyae Conservancy (||Xa|hoba and 7-15 November 2011 N‡animh) N‡a Jaqna Conservancy (Mangetti Dune, Luhebo and 30 January to Omatako) 5 February 2012 Vergenoeg 21-23 July 2012 Uitkoms 22 July 2012 Total 42 Field research period: 23 October 2011 to 26 September 2012 Bibliography 631 Annex B: Stakeholder interviews Name of Interviewee Institution and/or position Date Place Windhoek (Khomas Region) Lara Diez, Wendy Viall Nyae Nyae Development Foundation of Namibia (NNDFN) 7/12/2011 NNDFN office Sam Mayinoti Independent consultant 2/10/2012 LAC office Aaron Classe Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), Division of San Development 31/1/2013 OPM John Walters Ombudsman Namibia 25/2/2013 Office of the Ombudsman Nelago S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Muesee Kazapua Also Said Yesterday That Madikizela-Mandela Deserves a Street to Be Named After Her
    11111 Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia Media Monitoring on Urban Development in Namibia is a service provided by Development Workshop Namibia (DWN), a Namibian NGO with a focus on sustainable urban development and poverty reduction. DWN is part of a world-wide network of Development Workshop (DW) organisations with centres in Canada, Angola and France, and offices in Vietnam and Burkino Faso. It was founded in the 1970s by three architect students in the UK and has been funded by non- governmental organisations, private citizens, and national and international development organisations. In Namibia, DWN’s activities focus on urban related research, effective urban planning for the urban poor, solutions to informal settlements, water & sanitation, and projects specifically targeting disadvantaged segments of the urban youth. Through 40 years of engagement on urban issues mainly in Africa and Asia, the DW network of organisations has acquired significant institutional knowledge and capacity and is well integrated in regional and international networks. The Namibian media provide an important source of information on urban development processes in the country, highlighting current events, opportunities and challenges. The media further provide insight into the different views and perceptions of a variety of actors, be it from government, non- government, private sector, and individuals that reside in Namibia’s towns and settlements. It is therefore hoped that DWN’s Media Monitoring service will provide insights into those different views, with potential use for a variety of institutions and decision-makers that work in the urban environment in Namibia. The Media Monitoring service is currently provided on a monthly basis and monitors the following newspapers: The Namibian, Republikein, Namibian Sun, New Era, Windhoek Observer, Confidente, and Informante.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D.C
    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION THE HERERO PEOPLE’S REPARATIONS CORPORATION, : a District of Columbia Corporation : 1625 K Street, NW, #102 : Washington, D.C. 20006 : : THE HEREROS, : a Tribe and Ethnic and Racial Group, : by and through its Paramount Chief : By Paramount Chief Riruako : Paramount Chief K. Riruako : P.O. Box 60991 Katutura : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Mburumba Getzen Kerina : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Kurundiro Kapuuo : Case No. 01-0004447 Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Judge Jackson Calendar 2 Cornelia Tjaveondja : Next Scheduled Event: P.O. Box 24861 : Initial Scheduling Conference Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : September 18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Moses Nguarambuka : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Hilde Kazakoka Kamberipa : SQ66 Genesis Street : P.O. Box 61831 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Festus Korukuve : P.O. Box 50 : Opuuo (Otuzemba), Namibia : Uezuvanjo Tjihavgc : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Ujeuetu Tjihange : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Moses Katuuo : P.O. Box 930 : Gobabis, Namibia 9000 : Levy K. O. Nganjone : P.O. Box 309 : Gobabis, Namibia : Festus Ndjai : Opuuo, Namibia : Hoomajo Jjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Uelembuia Tjinawba : Okandombo : Okunene Region, Namibia : Jararaihe Tjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Hangekaoua Mbinge : Opuuo, Namibia : Ehrens Jeja : Box 210 : Omaruru : Omatjete, Namibia : Nathanael Uakumbua : Box 211 : Omaruru, Namibia : Rudolph Kauzuu : Box 210 : Omatjete : Omaruru, Namibia : 2 Jaendekua Kapika : Opuuo, Namibia : Ben Mbeuserua : P.O. Box 224 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Felix Kokati : Box 47 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Samuel Upendura : Oyinene : Omaheke Region, Namibia : Majoor Festus Kamburona : P.O. 1131 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Uetavera Tjirambi : Okonmgo : Okanene Region, Namibia : Julius Katjingisiua : P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (MDR) Tuberculosis in Ohangwena Region, Namibia
    Prevention of development and spread of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Ohangwena region, Namibia Johannes Ndeutapo Hango Namibia 45th International Course in Health Development September 22, 2008 œ September 11, 2009 KIT (ROYAL TROPICAL INSTITUTE) Development Policy & Practice/ Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam itle Prevention of development and spread of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Ohangwena region, Namibia A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Public Health by Johannes Ndeutapo Hango Namibia Declaration: Where other people‘s work has been used (either from printed source, internet or any other source) this has been carefully acknowledged and referenced in accordance with departmental requirements. This thesis Prevention of development and spread of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Ohangwena region, Namibia is my own work. Signature: _______________ 45th International Course in Health Development (ICHD) September 22, 2008 œ September 11, 2009 KIT (Royal Tropical Institute)/ Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands September 2009 Organized by: KIT (Royal Tropical Institute), Development Policy & Practice Amsterdam, The Netherlands In co-operation with: Vrije University Amsterdam/ free University of Amsterdam (VU) Amsterdam, The Netherlands Dedication This work is dedicated to my wife Josephine, son Joy and two daughters Jane and Janet / [ [ ! ! L / . Ç Ç b Ç / t $ h $ D $ Ç. h / t t ( W *w ( $ ! , - $ ! - $ { , - / { 0 - ( a - - L 2 2 [ 2 3 Y 2 /I!tÇ9w " C$ $ % $ C a *ó5w8Ç. 9 $ Ç : a ; $ I $$ 9 / $ w a *ó5w8Ç. $ { $ ! >0 8 /*5{Ç? $ $ ! > ? $ $ / Ü 0 $ $ ( w a 5w8Ç. $ $$ / a *ó5w8Ç. b / $$ { / $$ ! >0 8 /*5{Ç? ( $$$ ! > ? - $$/ Ü 0 - $$( w a 5w8Ç.
    [Show full text]
  • Kunene Regional Development Profile 2015
    Kunene Regional Council Kunene Regional Development Profile2015 The Ultimate Frontier Foreword 1 Foreword The Kunene Regional Devel- all regional stakeholders. These issues inhabitants and wildlife, but to areas opment Profile is one of the include, rural infrastructural develop- beyond our region, through exploring regional strategic documents ment, poverty and hunger, unemploy- and exposing everything Kunene has which profiles who we are as ment, especially youth, regional eco- to offer. the Great Kunene Region, what nomic growth, HIV/AIDS pandemic, I believe that if we rally together as a we can offer in terms of current domestic or gender based violence and team, the aspirations and ambitions of service delivery (strengths), our illegal poaching of our wildlife. our inhabitants outlined in this docu- regional economic perform- ment can be easily transformed into ances, opportunities, challenges It must be understood clearly to all of successful implementation of socio and and constraints. us as inhabitants of this Great Kunene, economic development in our region, and Namibians at large, that our re- which will guarantee job creation, In my personal capacity as the Region- gional vision has been aligned with our economic growth, peace and political al Governor of Kunene Region and a national vision. Taking into account stability. Regional Political Head Representative the current impact of development in of the government, I strongly believe our region, we have a lot that we need With these remarks, it is my honor and that the initiation
    [Show full text]
  • Kunene Toolkit
    LET’S ACT TO ADAPT Dealing with Climate Change A community information toolkit on adaptation A resource package developed for farmers and natural resource users in the Kunene Region, Namibia September 2011 A project implemented by the Ministry of Environment & Tourism LET’S ACT TO ADAPT • Dealing with Climate Change Page 1 Africa Adaptation Programme – Namibia Project (AAP-NAM) implemented by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism Prepared by: Integrated Environmental Consultants Namibia (IECN) Integrated Environmental Consultants Namibia Artwork by: Nicky Marais Layout by: Haiko Bruns English version edited by: WordNet Otjiherero translation by: Nathanael K. Mbaeva Nama/Damara translation by: Laurentius Davids Printed by: John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd ISBN 978-99945-0-025-3 Funded by the Government of Japan through UNDP Acknowledgements: The development of this toolkit draws heavily from a large number of consultations and reviews. Farmers and Regional Council representatives of selected constituencies in the Kunene Region of Namibia are thanked for their participation and vigorous inputs. For Kunene Region consultations took place in Opuwo and Kamanjab constituencies. Page 2 LET’S ACT TO ADAPT • Dealing with Climate Change Contents Why is climate change an important issue for farmers and natural resource users in the Kunene Region? ...........................................................................................................................................4 About this information toolkit ................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Understanding Damara / ‡Nūkhoen and ||Ubun Indigeneity
    13 • Understanding Damara / ‡Nūkhoen and ||Ubun indigeneity and marginalisation in Namibia Sian Sullivan and Welhemina Suro Ganuses1 • 1 Introduction In historical and ethnographic texts for Namibia, Damara / ‡N khoen peoples are usually understood to be amongst the territory’s “oldest” or “original” inhabitants.2 Similarly, histories written or narrated by Damara / ‡N khoen peoples include their self-identification as original inhabitants of large swathes of Namibia’s 1 Contribution statement: Sian Sullivan has drafted the text of this chapter and carried out the literature review, with all field research and Khoekhoegowab-English translations and interpretations being carried out with Welhemina Suro Ganuses from Sesfontein / !Nani|aus. We have worked together on and off since meeting in 1994. The authors’ stipend for this work is being directed to support the Future Pasts Trust, currently being established with local trustees to support heritage activities in Sesfontein / !Nani|aus and surrounding areas, particularly by the Hoanib Cultural Group (see https://www.futurepasts.net/future-pasts-trust). 2 See, for example, Goldblatt, Isaak, South West Africa From the Beginning of the 19th Century, Juta & Co. Ltd, Cape Town, 1971; Lau, Brigitte, A Critique of the Historical Sources and Historiography Relating to the ‘Damaras’ in Precolonial Namibia, BA History Dissertation, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 1979; Fuller, Ben, Institutional Appropriation and Social Change Among Agropastoralists in Central Namibia 1916–1988, PhD Dissertation,
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Republic of Namibia
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$10.40 WINDHOEK - 9 November 2009 No. 4375 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICES No. 222 General election for the President: List of duly nominated candidates for office of President: Electoral Act, 1992 ............................................................................................................................................... 1 No. 223 General election for the President and members of the National Assembly: Notification of polling stations: Electoral Act, 1992 ................................................................................................................. 3 No. 224 General election for members of the National Assembly: Publication of party lists: Electoral Act, 1992 23 No. 225 General election for election of the President and members of the National Assembly: Notification of the final voters’ register: Electoral Act, 1992 ....................................................................................... 58 ________________ Government Notices ELECTORAL COMMISSION No. 222 2009 GENERAL ELECTION FOR THE PRESIDENT: LIST OF DULY NOMINATED CANDIDATES FOR OFFICE OF PRESIDENT: ELECTORAL ACT, 1992 In terms of section 57(3) of the Electoral Act, 1992 (Act No. 24 of 1992), and for the purpose of the general election for the office of President to be held on 27 November 2009 and 28 November 2009, notice is given that - (a) the name of each political party which has duly nominated a candidate to take part in the election for the office of President is set out in Column
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Republic of Namibia
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$4.00 WINDHOEK - 1 October 2015 No. 5846 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 33 Determination of date and place for submission of nominations of candidates, polling day and notifi- cation of names of returning officers for the general election of members of regional councils and members of local authority councils: Electoral Act, 2014 (Act No. 5 of 2014) .................................... 1 ________________ Proclamation by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 33 2015 DETERMINATION OF DATE AND PLACE FOR SUBMISSION OF NOMINATIONS OF CANDIDATES, POLLING DAY AND NOTIFICATION OF NAMES OF RETURNING OFFICERS FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF REGIONAL COUNCILS AND MEMBERS OF LOCAL AUTHORITY COUNCILS: ELECTORAL ACT, 2014 (ACT NO. 5 OF 2014) Under the powers vested in me by section 64(1) of the Electoral Act, 2014 (Act No. 5 of 2014) read with section 81 of that Act, I make known that, in respect of the general election of members of all regional councils and of members of all local authority councils - (a) I have, on the recommendation of the Electoral Commission of Namibia, determined Friday, 16 October 2015 as the day on which a public sitting must take place - (i) in each constituency, indicated in column 2 of Schedule A, for the submission of nominations of candidates for election as member of the regional council in respect of that constituency; and 2 Government Gazette 1 October 2015 5846 (ii) in each local authority area, indicated in column 2 of Schedule B, for the submission of
    [Show full text]