Greece 2019 International Religious Freedom Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mali 2018 International Religious Freedom Report
MALI 2018 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution prohibits religious discrimination and grants individuals freedom of religion in conformity with the law. The law criminalizes abuses against religious freedom. On January 31, the government adopted a new national Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) strategy that included interfaith efforts and promotion of religious tolerance. The Ministry of Religious Affairs and Worship was responsible for administering the national CVE strategy, in addition to promoting religious tolerance and coordinating national religious activities such as pilgrimages and religious holidays for followers of all religions. Terrorist groups used violence and launched attacks against civilians, security forces, peacekeepers, and others they reportedly perceived as not adhering to their interpretation of Islam. In the center of the country, affiliates of Jamaat Nasr al- Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) attacked multiple towns in Mopti Region, threatening Christian, Muslim, and traditional religious communities, reportedly for heresy. Muslim religious leaders condemned extremist interpretations of sharia, and non- Muslim religious leaders condemned religious extremism. Some Christian missionaries expressed concern about the increased influence in remote areas of organizations they characterized as violent and extremist. Religious leaders, including Muslims and Catholics, jointly called for peace among all faiths at a celebration marking Eid al-Fitr in June hosted by President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita. In January Muslim, Protestant, and Catholic religious leaders called for peace and solidary among faiths at a conference organized by the youth of the Protestant community. The president of the High Islamic Council of Mali (HCI) and other notable religious leaders announced the necessity for all religious leaders to work toward national unity and social cohesion. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 4 April 2019
United Nations A/RES/73/285 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 April 2019 Seventy-third session Agenda item 72 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 2 April 2019 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/73/L.79 and A/73/L.79/Add.1)] 73/285. Combating terrorism and other acts of violence based on religion or belief The General Assembly, Recalling that all States have pledged themselves, under the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1 to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, Recalling also its relevant resolutions, including resolution 73/164 of 17 December 2018 on combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief, and resolution 73/176 of 17 December 2018 on freedom of religion or belief, Reaffirming that discrimination against human beings on the grounds of religion or belief constitutes an affront to human dignity and a disavowal of the principles of the Charter, Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination and violence on the basis of religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and effective protection of the law, Recalling that States have the primary responsibility to promote and protect human rights, including the human rights of persons belonging to religious minorities, including their right to exercise their religion or belief freely, Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance and discrimination and acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief, __________________ 1 Resolution 217 A (III). -
The Greek New Right and the Eve of Conservative Populism
The Visio Journal ● Volume 4 ● 2019 The Greek New Right and the Eve of Conservative Populism By Athanasios Grammenos* The economic crisis in the Eurozone and its dire consequences for Greece terminated the post-1974 political consensus, which was based on a pro-European and democratic concord. The collapse of the social-democratic Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) in 2012 allowed space for the radical Left to become the new pole of the political system. To this advancement, the conservatives, being the other pole, responded with a prompt enlargement attempt to the populist right-wing, engulfing several elements of the New Right. This new political order had had evident effects on the party’s social and economic agenda, escalating the political debate at the expense of established liberal principles. While in opposition (2015-2019), New Democracy (ND), member of the European Peo- ple’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament, voted against a series of liberal bills (gender issues, separation of Church and State, the Macedonian issue, etc.) giving out positions with authoritarian and populist essence. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the rise of the New Right in Greece (2012-2019) in both rhetoric and practice, and its consequences for law institutions, human rights and foreign affairs. It is argued that ND, currently holding office, has been occupied by deeply conservative elements as a response to the rise of the radical Left, adopting occasionally ultra-conservative positions in a wide range of social issues. Although the case of Greece is unlike to those in other European countries, nevertheless, to the extent to which the preservation of traditional hierarchies come into question, the political platform of the Greek New Right, which has embedded authoritarian attitudes cultivating an anti-liberal sub-culture to the party’s voters, is in accordance with several European conservative movements like in Hungary, Austria or Czechia. -
1.10 Religious Privilege, Tolerance and Discrimination (Part 2) – What Are They?
EXPLORING SECULARISM THEME 1. CORE PRINCIPLES 1.10 Religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination (part 2) – What are they? BACKGROUND Concepts of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination are central to secularism. They come up in other resources and can be brought up in almost any discussion of religion in public life. Resources 1.10 and 1.11 address these directly and encourage students to engage with different viewpoints on these central terms. The resource contains three stimuli; the first defines these key terms, the second provides examples and the third compares privilege and discrimination. The exercises assess students’ background knowledge and invite discussion of the examples and differing opinions on the key concepts. SUBJECTS Politics | Religion & Belief Education | Citizenship | SMSC | Fundamental British Values KEY QUESTIONS • What are religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination? LEARNING Basic OUTCOMES Students should demonstrate they can: • Understand the basic principles of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination. • Identify and comment on the role of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination in simplistic examples of conflicts involving religion and the rights of others. Advanced In addition to the basic learning outcomes, students should demonstrate they can: • Critically reflect on the principles of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination, drawing on a range of outside examples. • Offer nuanced comments on the role of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination in a range of social debates involving religion and the rights of others. LINKS Resource page: ExploringSecularism.org/110-religious-privilege-toleranc STIMULUS Stimulus #1 (Principles) What are religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination? Privilege, tolerance and discrimination are key concepts within sociology and social justice. -
Secretary-General of the United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism
Remarks by Mr. Vladimir Voronkov, Under- Secretary-General of the United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism “Countering Terrorism and other acts of Violence based on Religion or Belief: Fostering Tolerance and Inclusivity” 24 June 2019 Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to thank Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi and Ambassador Feridun Hadi Sinirlioğlu for organizing this important event and inviting UNOCT to partner. I also welcome Archobisp Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations. In recent months, we have witnessed horrific attacks against places of worship that have claimed many innocent lives, spread fear, and contributed to growing polarization and intolerance around the world. Many of these attacks have sought to exploit existing religious tensions and grievances. There has also been an alarming rise in hate speech, xenophobia and other forms of bigotry, which can incite violence. For instance, we have seen a resurgence of anti-Semitism and Neo-Nazi organizations, while attacks on Muslims in several societies are on the rise. These worrying developments raise much broader questions for the international community related to our efforts to maintain peace and security. 1 How can we promote tolerance and peaceful co-existence in an era of globalization when there are unprecedented human interactions taking place, both online and offline, across boundaries of faith and culture? Are our societies ready to cope with a hyper-connected world? And most importantly, how can we work together to promote tolerant and inclusive societies in unstable and fragile environments? These are critical questions, for which, unfortunately, we do not seem to have a definite answer. -
A/69/261 General Assembly
United Nations A/69/261 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 August 2014 Original: English Sixty-ninth session Item 69 (b) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms Elimination of all forms of religious intolerance Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly the interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, submitted in accordance with General Assembly resolution 68/170. * A/69/150. 14-58756 (E) 250814 *1458756* A/69/261 Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Summary In the present report, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, provides an overview of his mandate activities since the submission of the previous report to the General Assembly (A/68/290), including his reports to the Human Rights Council and on country visits, as well as communications and highlights of presentations and consultations. The Special Rapporteur then focuses on means to eliminate religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace, a theme which he thinks warrants more systematic attention. The sources of religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace can be manifold and include prejudices existing among employers, employees or customers, restrictive interpretations of corporate identity or a general fear of religious diversity. After clarifying that the human right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief also relates to manifestations of religious diversity in the workplace, the Special Rapporteur particularly deals with measures of “reasonable accommodation” that may be needed to overcome discrimination. -
European Commission
COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 13 juin 2014 CALENDRIER du 16 au 22 juin 2014 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 16 juin M. José Manuel Durão BARROSO est en visite à Santander, Espagne Ms Viviane REDING in Albufeira, Portugal: Attends working lunch with Ms Paula TEIXEIRA DA CRUZ, Minister for Justice of Portugal Mr Siim KALLAS delivers keynote speech at the 10th ITS European Congress in Helsinki, Finland Ms Neelie KROES visits South Korea and Australia (16-20/06) Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ opens the new Slovak Research Office in Brussels Mr Janez POTOČNIK in London, United-Kingdom: gives a lecture on New Environmentalism and Circular Economy at University College London Institute for Sustainable Resources with Mr Dan ROGERSON, UK Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for water, forestry, rural affairs and resource management Ms Maria DAMANAKI in Washington, USA: meets with Dr Kathryn SULLIVAN, Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator; speaks at the International Oceans Conference Mr Günther H. OETTINGER in Bratislava, Slovakia: meets Mr Tomáš MALATINSKÝ, Minister of Economy of the Slovak Republic; participates in the European Nuclear Energy Forum (ENEF) Mr Johannes HAHN in Thüringen, Germany: gives a keynote speech at the "Innovation 2020" Forum Ms Connie HEDEGAARD on mission to Sofia, Bulgaria Mr Štefan FÜLE visits Turkey Mr László ANDOR delivers keynote speech at the conference "From active inclusion to social investment" organised by the European Economic and Social Committee and Eurofound Mr László ANDOR delivers a speech on the social dimension of EMU in Athens, Greece Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM attends a seminar on visa policy in Brussels; participates in the EU Radicalisation Awareness Network Annual Meeting Mardi 17 juin M. -
A Qualitative Study of the Competitiveness of the Port of Thessaloniki
Erasmus University Rotterdam MSc in Maritime Economics and Logistics 2019/2020 A qualitative study of the competitiveness of the port of Thessaloniki By Tsioukanaras Paraskevas Copyright Tsioukanaras Paraskevas 1 Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest appreciation and love to my parents and my brother who did not only financed my studies but underpinned me mentally throughout the whole year and inspired me to keep on trying on pursuing a career in the maritime industry. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, professor Elvira Haezendonck who entrusted me to carry out this study and facilitated me in the process of making it. I would also like to thank the MEL office and the professors of the whole program for their help during my studies. I would like to acknowledge the help of many of my fellow students with whom we spent this year and worked hard during all the academical year. Special thanks to Ioanna Christodoulou, Prithvin Leonard, Elisabeth Mathisen, Nikolas Pantagias and Alex Karalis should be attributed. Last but not least, i am extremely grateful to all the experts who participated in my study by giving out in-person interviews and contributing substantially to the current qualitative research. 2 Abstract Nowadays ports are facing a fast-changing environment which imposes many alterations to their functions. As ports are trying to adopt to these circumstances, they search for ways that can enhance their competitiveness so as to get ahead of competition. The current paper puts the second biggest port of Greece, namely the port of Thessaloniki, under scope and efforts to find out how its competitiveness can increase. -
Religious Tolerance - Intolerance in India
RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE - INTOLERANCE IN INDIA Dr. Xavier Kochuparampil India is the cradle of four world religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and Jainism. Two other world religions, namely Christianity and Islam came to this country in the first century of their existence. For centuries Christians were living in India side by side with the vast majority of non-Christians, mainly Hindus. Though known for centuries as a land of religious tolerance and non-violence, in India communal disharmony, religious intolerance, fundamentalism, and all kinds of violence are on the increase. Why this paradigm shift in the attitude of the Indian people? This short article is an attempt to understand some of the new trends in the realm of communal harmony in India. A Democratic Republic The question of religious tolerance or intolerance depends very much on the encounter between the different religions that co-exist in the same land. For centuries Indians have lived in a religiously pluralistic society. Though all the major religions of the world have their followers in India, Hinduism is the most dominant religion of India with about 80 % of the whole population of about 950 million. Yet one has to acknowledge the fact that the Indian nation is not constitutionally Hindu nation like the numerous Islamic or Christian nations of the world. Constitutionally India remains a democratic sovereign republic where all religions are of equal status. Moreover, the so-called minority communities (religions) do enjoy certain constitutionally granted privileges. Attitude of Tolerance The traditional Hindu attitude to Christianity and Islam was one of tolerance. The existence of the small community of Christians in South India from the very first century of Christianity is the best proof for this attitude of tolerance in Hinduism. -
Annual Report - Fiscal Year
ANNUAL REPORT - FISCAL YEAR 2004 THESSALONIKI PORT AUTHORITY sa JUNE 2005 THESSALONIKI PORT AUTHORITY sa JUNE 2005 ANNUAL REPORT - FISCAL YEAR 2004 THESSALONIKI PORT AUTHORITY sa Table of Contents Summary of Published Financial Data of ThPA SA………………………………….…………… pg. 09 CHAPTER 1 Information about the Annual Report & the Company’s Auditors……………………………… pg. 12 1.1. General.……………………………………………………………………………… pg. 12 1.2. Responsible for the edition.………………………………………………………… pg. 12 1.3. Certified Auditors…………………………………………………………………… pg. 13 1.4. Tax Audits…………………………………………………………………………… pg. 13 CHAPTER 2 Shareholders’ rights………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 15 2.1. General………………………………………………………………………………. pg. 15 2.2. Special Rights of the Shareholders or Third Parties………………………………… pg. 16 2.3. Dividend Collection…………………………………………………………………. pg. 18 2.4. Dividend Taxation…………………………………………………………………… pg. 18 CHAPTER 3 Stock Market Information for the Company’s Share…………………………………………….. pg. 20 CHAPTER 4 Information about the Company……………………….………………………….……….……… pg. 24 4.1. General Information………………………………………………………………… pg. 24 page 4.2. Company History…………………………….………….……….…………….…… pg. 25 4.3. Information about the capital….……….………………….……………………… pg. 26 4.4. Description of the Port………….……………………………….………………… pg. 32 4.5. Scope of activities. ………………….…………….…………………….………… pg. 33 4.6. Construction of Works and Procurements ……………….…………….……….… pg. 44 4.7. Pricing Policy …………………………….………………………………………… pg. 44 4.8. Fixed assets………………………………………………………………………… pg. 45 4.9. IT projects…………………….…………………….…………….………………… -
PDF: First Two Groups of New Members of Cabinet Sworn in on Tuesday In
5 Ιανουαρίου 2021 First two groups of new members of cabinet sworn in on Tuesday in Greece Ξένες γλώσσες / In English The second group of new members of the cabinet, following a reshuffle, arrived at the presidential mansion to be sworn in at 11:45 on Tuesday, in the presence of President of the Hellenic Republic Katerina Sakellaropoulou and Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis. As for the first group, before entering the presidential mansion they each did a rapid test for coronavirus as a precaution. The second group includes Thodoris Livanios, who was appointed deputy minister to the prime minister, Christos Tarantilis who takes over from Stelios Petsas as government spokesperson, Zetta Makri and Angelos Syriggos, who have been appointed as deputy education ministers, Maria Syreggela, as deputy labour minister, and Giorgos Kotsiras, as a deputy justice minister. Archbishop of Athens and All Greece Ieronymos did not conduct the ceremony for the second group, who are all deputy ministers. Earlier, the first six of the new ministers and deputy ministers joining the government or switching portfolios were sworn in by Archbishop Ieronymos at the presidential mansion at 11:00, in the presence of President Sakellaropoulou and the prime minister. The new members of cabinet were split up into three groups for the swearing-in ceremony, as a measure to protect against the spread of Covid-19. The first group included Kostis Hatzidakis, the new labour minister, Kostas Skrekas who is taking over the environment ministry, Makis Voridis who will lead the interior ministry, Spilios Livanos who is the new rural development minister, Vassilis Kontozamanis who has become alternate health minister and Stelios Petsas, who is now alternate interior minister. -
Golden Dawn and the Right-Wing Extremism in Greece
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Golden Dawn and the Right-Wing Extremism in Greece Lymouris, Nikolaos November 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106463/ MPRA Paper No. 106463, posted 08 Mar 2021 07:42 UTC Golden Dawn and the Right-Wing Extremism in Greece Dr Nikolaos Lymouris London School of Economics - Introduction There is an ongoing controversy as to whether extreme right has been a longstanding political phenomenon in Greece or whether it is associated with the ongoing economic crisis. The first view suggests that the extreme right ideology has been an integral part of modern Greek political history because of its tradition of far-right dictatorships. The other view emphasizes the fact that the extreme right in Greece never actually existed simply because of the lack of a nationalist middle class. In effect, the emergence of Golden Dawn is simply an epiphenomenon of the economic crisis. At the same time, a broad new trend was adopted not only by the mass media but also -unfortunately– the academia in order to expand – by using false criteria - the political boundaries of the extreme right, to characterize as many parties as possible as extreme right. In any case, the years after the fall of the Greek junta (from 1974 until today) there are mainly two right-wing parties in the Greek political life: the “United Nationalist Movement” (ENEK in its Greek acronym), a fridge organisation acted during the mid 80’s and has ceased to exist, and the Golden Dawn, whose electoral success provoked an important political and social debate.