DOCSLIB.ORG

Dangerousness and Incapacitation: a Predictive Evaluation of Sentencing Policy Reform in California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dangerousness and Incapacitation: a Predictive Evaluation of Sentencing Policy Reform in California The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Dangerousness and Incapacitation: A Predictive Evaluation of Sentencing Policy Reform in California Author(s): Kathleen Auerhahn Document No.: 189734 Date Received: August 20, 2001 Award Number: 99-IJ-CX-0043 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. I UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Dangerousness and Incapacitation: A Predictive Evaluation of Sentencing Policy Reform in California A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology Kathleen Auerhahn September, 2000 PROPERTY OF National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Box 6000 Dissertation Committee: Rockville, MD 20849-6000~TI' Dr. Robert A. Hanneman, Chair Dr. Austin T. Turk Dr. Shaun Bowler This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. I copyright by Kathleen Auerhahn 2000 d 1 1 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The Dissertation of Kathleen Auerhahn is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside I This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Acknowledgments While the author is primarily responsible for the contents of any dissertation, a project of this magnitude never represents only the efforts of one person. Along the way, many others helped me in various ways, some of which are evident in these pages, and others, while not necessarily apparent, were nonetheless instrumental in the completion of this work, if only through their contribution in the effort to preserve my sanity. I would like to thank the following individuals: First, I am hugely indebted to Bob Hanneman, for all of his support throughout the years. He is without question the finest teacher I have ever known. Words cannot express the debt I owe to Bob, for shaping me as a scholar, and a teacher - and he also contributed mightily to the preservation of my sanity over these years. Throughout my time at UC Riverside, Austin Turk has taught, guided, and challenged me to be a better theorist and scholar. A seemingly innocuous notation on the margin of a manuscript would sometimes send me reeling off into weeks of research - which would manifest itself as a single sentence or note in the manuscript, but one that ultimately became essential to the argument I was making. He’s been doing this to me and other students for years. I hope the others appreciate and grow from it as much as I have. I am grateful to Bob Figlio for the time I was able to work with him. Although I missed his input at the last stages of my dissertation due to his leaving UCR, I am grateful to have had the opportunity to learn so much from him while I had the chance. iv This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Thanks also to Shaun Bowler, who I managed to trick into giving me a lot of help and guidance throughout the project. I would like to thank the sociology department staff for their assistance over the years: Renee DeGuire, Anna Wire, Terry DeAnda, Cathy Carlson, and Robin Whittington. Anna Wire deserves extra thanks, not just for the myriad ways in which she assists the graduate students, but for being such a wonderful and supportive friend. I am also especially grateful to Robin Whittington for her extensive assistance in securing and administering funding for my project. To avoid making crucial and embarrassing omissions (and to protect the innocent), I will refrain from listing the names of friends and family who supported and encouraged me in various ways. They know who they are, and they have all my thanks. It’s been a long hard road, and my friends and family have been instrumental in getting me through it. Validation data were provided by the California Criminal Justice Statistics Center (CJSC) and the California Department of Corrections. Linda Nance of the CJSC was especially helpful. I am also grateful to Helen Ross and Alexis Alvarez, who provided invaluable last-minute assistance with data entry. This project was supported by grant number 1999-IJ-CX-0043, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. V This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Dangerousness and Incapacitation: A Predictive Evaluation of Sentencing Policy Reform in California Kathleen Auerhahn Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Sociology University of California, Riverside, September, 2000 Dr. Robert A. Hanneman, Chair In the last three decades, the United States has witnessed explosive growth in prison populations. At the same time, an unprecedented amount of sentencing reform activity has taken place. Many have argued that the primary objective of criminal punishment in recent years has been the incapacitation of dangerous criminal sin order to ensure the public safety. Nowhere is this more evident than in California, where the most far-reaching and widely implemented Three-Strikes habitual offender law was passed in 1994, following a period of twenty years of unprecedented growth in the state’s incarcerated population. The passage of Three Strikes represents the culmination of several decades’ worth of criminal sentencing policy reform in the state. Although individual reforms may have been constructed to serve diverse ends, it is worthwhile to examine the cumulative effects of these reforms with respect to selective incapacitation. It is also important to consider the systemic nature of the criminal justice system, in that structural constraints (such as facility capacity) may have an effect on the implementation vi This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. and outcome of specific reforms. Existing data and statistical methods are inadequate to examine the systemic effects of reforms with respect to the incapacitation of dangerous criminals. The methodological strategies employed differ from those used in prior research both in terms of a new approach to the conceptualization of dangerousness and the evaluation criteria of selective incapacitation policies, as well as the use of simulation modeling in order to reproduce and evaluate the California criminal justice system. The retrospective analyses indicate that these policies have not been terribly successful in terms of selecting the most dangerous offenders for incarceration. Prospective analyses conducted using the simulation methodology construct “possible futures” for the California criminal justice system under a variety of sentencing structures and policies, including geriatric release and narrowing of Three Strikes eligibility. These analyses indicate that California’s Three Strikes law will not function as an effective means for incapacitating dangerous offenders, and offer alternatives that aim to guide policy makers in the direction of constructing and implementing sentencing policies that will be successful at targeting and incapacitating dangerous offenders, vii This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Table of Contents Chapter One Introduction Page 1 Chapter Two Criminal Punishment in Civil Society: Page 25 Purpose and Method Chapter Three Criminal Sentencing Policy and Page 64 Paradigm Change in California Chapter Four Selective Incapacitation Page 100 Chapter Five Dangerousness Page 122 Chapter Six Assessing the Level of Dangerousness in Page 146 the California Criminal Justice System Chapter Seven Modeling the California Criminal Justice Page 17 1 System, Part I : Reproducing and Evaluating the Past Chapter Eight Modeling the California Criminal Justice Page 222 System, Part 11 : Predictive Evaluation Chapter Nine Conclusion: Choosing California’s Page 261 Future Technical Appendix Data Sources and Estimation Procedures Page 300 ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE WIRE: Crime, Law and Policy LAW 810-511
    UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SPRING 2016 SYLLABUS Course: THE WIRE: Crime, Law and Policy LAW 810-511 Instructor: Professor Robert Bogomolny Office: Al 1105 Email: [email protected] Days/Time: Wednesday 10-11:50 a.m. Location: TBA Course Description: This course explores legal and policy issues raised by David Simon's critically acclaimed HBO series The Wire. Among the topics explored will be searches, confessions, police manipulation of crime statistics, race and the criminal justice system, prosecutor's incentives for charging and dismissing cases, honesty and accountability of law enforcement, government power and access in the war on drugs, and the distribution of resources in the criminal justice system. *Before enrolling in this course, please be advised that (1) The Wire contains a considerable amount of violence, adult content, and offensive language, (2) this course will require you to invest a significant amount of time outside of class to watch the entire series; and (3) this class is not blind graded. If any of the aforementioned presents a problem, you should not enroll in this course. Course Materials: The Wire: Crime, Law and Policy ISBN # 9781611641968 The Wire (Seasons 1 through 5)* *We have 2 copies in the law school library to check out and Langsdale has another one. You can also view it on HBOGO at http://www.hbogo.com/#search&browseMode=browseGrid?searchTerm=the%20wire/ Episodes are at http://www.hbogo.com/#series/browse&assetID=GORO1D596?assetType=SERIES?browseMod e=browseGrid?browseID=category.INDB464/ It’s free with an HBO subscription or $15 a month 1 It’s also available to subscribers of Amazon Prime.
    [Show full text]
  • Office for Victims of Crime
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office for Victims of Crime Office for Victims of Crime Report to the Nation 2001 Fiscal Years 1999 and 2000 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street NW. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Deborah J. Daniels Assistant Attorney General John W. Gillis Director, Office for Victims of Crime Office of Justice Programs World Wide Web Home Page www.ojp.usdoj.gov Office for Victims of Crime World Wide Web Home Page www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc For grant and funding information contact U.S. Department of Justice Response Center 1–800–421–6770 OVC Resource Center 1–800–627–6872 TTY: 1–877–712–9279 OVC Resource Center Home Page www.ncjrs.org NCJ 189205 The Office for Victims of Crime is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Victims of Crime Act of 1984, as amended: A Report to the President, the Congress, AND THE NATION Office for Victims of Crime Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice This report covers activities undertaken by the Office for Victims of Crime and its grantees with Crime Victims Fund revenues during Fiscal Years 1999–2000. Acknowledgments he Office for Victims of Crime gratefully acknowledges the work of Ashley Oliver Barrett, who analyzed data and numerous project T summaries to prepare the final draft of this Report to the Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Troubling the Waters for Healing of the Church
    Troub s ling ter the Wa for Healing of the Church A journey for White Christians from privilege to partnership Leaders Guide and Participants Handouts Troubling the Waters for Healing of the Church A journey for White Christians from privilege to partnership Credits The Commission for Multicultural Ministries of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America would like to thank and acknowledge the following people for their involvement in this project: Development Team Joyce Caldwell, project coordinator and lead writer Paul Benz, co-facilitator and secondary writer Project Support Tamara Borland Consultation Team Valerian Ahles Marilyn Liden Bode Sharon Eaton Matthew Ernst Maria Hall Lucy Kolin Marc Miller Roberta (Bobby) Parish Larry Peterson Hank Suhr Frankie Sweetnam Project Director D. Christine May Graphic Designer Sharon Schuster Logo Art Marilyn Liden Bode Pilot events of this resource took place in Seattle, Washington; New Brunswick, New Jersey; and Ames, Iowa. We give special thanks to the many contributions of Lutheran Human Relations Association (LHRA) to this work. The study and application of the story of The Good Samaritan in Luke 10 and of Peter and Cornelius in Acts 10 and 11 were developed by LHRA . The worksheets on the Cultural Pyramid, Levels of Racism, Racial Identity Development, and Levels of Congregational Development are also used with thanks and appreciation for the research and program development of LHRA. The Commission for Multicultural Ministries recognizes and celebrates the Lutheran Human Relations Association for over 50 years of work against racism. The Commission for Multicultural Ministries acknowledges and thanks Thrivent Financial for Lutherans for providing the grant to make this project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • ESP-History-Overview.Pdf
    EASTERN STATE PENITENTIARY A N A TIONAL HIST ORIC LANDMARK 1. History of Eastern State Penitentiary, Philadelphia In the ambitious age of reform following the American Revolution, the new nation aspired to change profoundly its public institutions, and to set an example for the world in social development. Every type of institution that we are familiar with today—educational, medical and governmental—was revolutionized in these years by the rational and humanistic principles of the Enlightenment. Of all of the radical innovations born in this era, American democracy was, of course, the most influ- ential. The second major intellectual export was prison design and reform. Most eighteenth century prisons were simply large holding pens. Groups of adults and children, men and women, and petty thieves and murderers, sorted out their own affairs behind locked doors. Physical punishment and mutilation were common, and abuse of the prisoners by the guards and overseers was assumed. In 1787, a group of well-known and powerful Philadelphians convened in the home of Benjamin Franklin. The members of The Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons expressed growing concern with the conditions in American and European prisons. Dr. Benjamin Rush spoke on the Society’s goal, to see the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania set the international standard in prison design. He proposed a radical idea: to build a true penitentiary, a prison designed to create genuine regret and penitence in the criminal’s heart. The concept grew from Enlightenment thinking, but no government had successfully carried out such a program. It took the Society more than thirty years to convince the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to build the kind of prison it suggested: a revolutionary new building on farmland outside Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMALE GENITAL CUTTING the Global North and South
    Copyright © The authors, 2020 Cover by Nille Leander and Sara Johnsdotter ISBN 978-91-7877-123-3 (print) ISBN 978-91-7877-124-0 (pdf) DOI 10.24834/isbn.9789178771240 Published by the Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies, Malmö University Printed at Holmbergs, Malmö 2020 FEMALE GENITAL CUTTING The Global North and South Edited by Sara Johnsdotter The publication can be accessed at mau.diva-portal.org (PDF) Contents Sara Johnsdotter & R. Elise B. Johansen Introduction 7 Ellen Gruenbaum Tensions and Movements: Female Genital Cutting in the Global North and South, Then and Now 23 Lisen Dellenborg The Significance of Engagement — Challenges for Ethnographers and Healthcare Givers in Understanding Human Vulnerability 59 Emmaleena Käkelä Rethinking Female Genital Cutting: From Culturalist to Structuralist Framework for Challenging Violence Against Women 79 Maria Väkiparta Young Men Against FGM/C in Somaliland: Discursively Negotiating Violence, Gender Norms, and Gender Order 103 Inger-Lise Lien Is the Ritual of Female Genital Mutilation an Event that Will Generate a Traumatic Stress Reaction for Cut Children? Cases from The Gambia, Eritrea and Somalia 131 Lisen Dellenborg & Maria Frederika Malmström Listening to the Real Agents of Change: Female Circumcision/Cutting, Female Genital Mutilation and Human Rights 159 R. Elise B. Johansen, in collaboration with Amira Jama Mohammed Ibrahim, Naeema Saeed Sheekh Mohammed, Khadra Yasien Ahmed, Abdirizak Mohamud, Ibrahim Sheick Mohammed Ahmed, & Omar Nur Gaal Methodological Reflections on the Engagement
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Encounter with Death
    The Human Encounter With Death by STANISLAV GROF, M.D. & JOAN HALIFAX, PH.D. with a Foreword by ELISABETH KÜBLER-ROSS, M.D D 492 / A Dutton Paperback / $3.95 / In Canada $4.75 Stanislav Grof, M.D., and Joan Halifax, Ph.D., have a unique authority and competence in the interpretation of the human encounter with death. Theirs is an extraordin­ ary range of experience, in clinical research with psyche- delic substances, in cross-cultural and medical anthropology, and in the analysis of Oriental and archaic literatures. Their pioneering work with psychedelics ad­ ministered to individuals dying of cancer opened domains of experience that proved to be nearly identical to those al­ ready mapped in the "Books of the Dead," those mystical visionary accounts of the posthumous journeys of the soul. The Grof/Halifax book and these ancient resources both show the imminent experience of death as a continuation of what had been the hidden aspect of the experience of life. —Joseph Campbell The authors have assisted persons dying of cancer in tran­ scending the anxiety and anger around their personal fate. Using psychedelics, they have guided the patients to death- rebirth experiences that resemble transformation rites practiced in a variety of cultures. Physician and medical anthropologist join here in recreating an old art—the art of dying. —June Singer The Human Encounter With Death is the latest of many re­ cent publications in the newly evolving field of thanatology. It is, however, a quite different kind of book—one that be­ longs in every library of anyone who seriously tries to un­ derstand the phenomenon we call death.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners of Solitude: Bringing History to Bear on Prison Health Policy Margaret Charleroy and Hilary Marland
    Prisoners of Solitude: Bringing History to Bear on Prison Health Policy Margaret Charleroy and Hilary Marland Season two of the popular prison drama Orange is the New Black opens in a small concrete cell, no larger than a parking space. The cell is windowless and sparsely furnished; it holds a toilet, a sink and a limp bed. The only distinguishing feature we see is a mural of smeared egg, made by the cell's resident, the show's protagonist Piper Chapman. When a correctional officer arrives at this solitary confinement cell, he wakes her, and mocks her egg fresco. “This is art,” she insists. “This is a yellow warbler drinking out of a daffodil.” Her rambling suggests the confusion and disorientation associated with inmates in solitary confinement, who often become dazed after only a few days in isolation. As the scene continues, we see Piper exhibit further symptoms associated with both short- and long-term solitary confinement—memory loss, inability to reason, mood swings, anxiety—all indicating mental deterioration and impaired mental health. In this and other episodes, we begin to see solitary confinement as the greatest villain in the show, more villainous than any character a writer could create. The new and growing trend of television prison dramas like Orange is the New Black brings the issue of solitary confinement, along with other issues related to incarceration, to a more general audience, exposing very real problems in the failing contemporary prison system, not just in America, but worldwide. The show's success leads us to ask how history, alongside fictional dramas and contemporary case reports, can draw attention to the issue of solitary confinement.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Procedure, the Police, and the Wire As Dissent
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship 2018 Criminal Procedure, the Police, and The irW e as Dissent I. Bennett aC pers Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation 2018 U. Chi. Legal F. 65 (2018) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. Criminal Procedure, the Police, and The Wire as Dissent Bennett Caperst The Wire is rich with metaphors. There is the physical wire in the opening credits, a metaphor for surveillance more generally. There is the metaphor of the wire in the sense of a modern tightrope-another filmic work, Man on a Wire,1 comes to mind-where any minute one can lose one's balance. There is even the metaphor of the wire in the 2 sense that the criminal justice system is all connected or networked. Indeed, thinking about our criminal justice system as a complex net- work allows us to see that many of the perceived flaws in the criminal justice system-racial disparities in charging3 and sentencing,4 and t Visiting Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law (Fall 2017); Stanley A. August Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. B.A. Princeton University; J.D. Columbia Law School. Assistant U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York 1995-2004. E-mail: bennett.capers @brooklaw.edu. ' See generally MAN ON A WIRE (Magnolia Pictures 2008) (documentary about Phillipe Pet- it's successful attempt, on August 7, 1974, to walk on a wire suspended between the towers of the World Trade Center; his act would later be described as the "artistic crime of the century").
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes
    Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law September 9, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32040 Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes Summary Federal mandatory minimum sentencing statutes limit the discretion of a sentencing court to impose a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment or the death penalty. They have a long history and come in several varieties: the not-less-than, the flat sentence, and piggyback versions. Federal courts may refrain from imposing an otherwise required statutory mandatory minimum sentence when requested by the prosecution on the basis of substantial assistance toward the prosecution of others. First-time, low-level, non-violent offenders may be able to avoid the mandatory minimums under the Controlled Substances Acts, if they are completely forthcoming. The most common imposed federal mandatory minimum sentences arise under the Controlled Substance and Controlled Substance Import and Export Acts, the provisions punishing the presence of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence or drug trafficking offense, the Armed Career Criminal Act, various sex crimes include child pornography, and aggravated identity theft. Critics argue that mandatory minimums undermine the rationale and operation of the federal sentencing guidelines which are designed to eliminate unwarranted sentencing disparity. Counter arguments suggest that the guidelines themselves operate to undermine individual sentencing discretion and that the ills attributed to other mandatory minimums are more appropriately assigned to prosecutorial discretion or other sources. State and federal mandatory minimums have come under constitutional attack on several grounds over the years, and have generally survived.
    [Show full text]
  • Punishment & Society
    Punishment & Society http://pun.sagepub.com/ Risk, responsibility and reconfiguration : Penal adaptation and misadaptation Fergus McNeill, Nicola Burns, Simon Halliday, Neil Hutton and Cyrus Tata Punishment & Society 2009 11: 419 DOI: 10.1177/1462474509341153 The online version of this article can be found at: http://pun.sagepub.com/content/11/4/419 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Punishment & Society can be found at: Email Alerts: http://pun.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://pun.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://pun.sagepub.com/content/11/4/419.refs.html >> Version of Record - Aug 14, 2009 What is This? Downloaded from pun.sagepub.com at Glasgow University Library on November 15, 2012 Copyright © The Author(s), 2009. Reprints and permissions: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/ journalsPermissions.nav 1462-4745; Vol 11(4): 419–442 DOI: 10.1177/1462474509341153 PUNISHMENT & SOCIETY Risk, responsibility and reconfiguration Penal adaptation and misadaptation FERGUS MCNEILL, NICOLA BURNS, SIMON HALLIDAY, NEIL HUTTON AND CYRUS TATA University of Glasgow, University of Glasgow, University of Strathclyde, University of Strathclyde and University of Strathclyde, UK Abstract This article draws on the findings of an ethnographic study of social enquiry and sentencing in the Scottish courts. It explores the nature of the practice of social enquiry (that is, of social workers preparing reports to assist sentencers) and explores the extent to which this practice is being reconfigured in line with the recent accounts of penal transformation. In so doing, we problematize and explore what we term the ‘govern- mentality gap’; meaning, a lacuna in the existing penological scholarship which concerns the contingent relationships between changing governmental rationalities and technologies on the one hand and the construction of penality-in-practice on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wire the Complete Guide
    The Wire The Complete Guide PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:03:03 UTC Contents Articles Overview 1 The Wire 1 David Simon 24 Writers and directors 36 Awards and nominations 38 Seasons and episodes 42 List of The Wire episodes 42 Season 1 46 Season 2 54 Season 3 61 Season 4 70 Season 5 79 Characters 86 List of The Wire characters 86 Police 95 Police of The Wire 95 Jimmy McNulty 118 Kima Greggs 124 Bunk Moreland 128 Lester Freamon 131 Herc Hauk 135 Roland Pryzbylewski 138 Ellis Carver 141 Leander Sydnor 145 Beadie Russell 147 Cedric Daniels 150 William Rawls 156 Ervin Burrell 160 Stanislaus Valchek 165 Jay Landsman 168 Law enforcement 172 Law enforcement characters of The Wire 172 Rhonda Pearlman 178 Maurice Levy 181 Street-level characters 184 Street-level characters of The Wire 184 Omar Little 190 Bubbles 196 Dennis "Cutty" Wise 199 Stringer Bell 202 Avon Barksdale 206 Marlo Stanfield 212 Proposition Joe 218 Spiros Vondas 222 The Greek 224 Chris Partlow 226 Snoop (The Wire) 230 Wee-Bey Brice 232 Bodie Broadus 235 Poot Carr 239 D'Angelo Barksdale 242 Cheese Wagstaff 245 Wallace 247 Docks 249 Characters from the docks of The Wire 249 Frank Sobotka 254 Nick Sobotka 256 Ziggy Sobotka 258 Sergei Malatov 261 Politicians 263 Politicians of The Wire 263 Tommy Carcetti 271 Clarence Royce 275 Clay Davis 279 Norman Wilson 282 School 284 School system of The Wire 284 Howard "Bunny" Colvin 290 Michael Lee 293 Duquan "Dukie" Weems 296 Namond Brice 298 Randy Wagstaff 301 Journalists 304 Journalists of The Wire 304 Augustus Haynes 309 Scott Templeton 312 Alma Gutierrez 315 Miscellany 317 And All the Pieces Matter — Five Years of Music from The Wire 317 References Article Sources and Contributors 320 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 324 Article Licenses License 325 1 Overview The Wire The Wire Second season intertitle Genre Crime drama Format Serial drama Created by David Simon Starring Dominic West John Doman Idris Elba Frankie Faison Larry Gilliard, Jr.
    [Show full text]