Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction MuscadineLayout 10/18/04 11:13 AM Page 8 AAES Research Report 974 Introduction The production of alternative or nontraditional crops is being explored by many small farmers as a way of increasing the value of their farming opera- tions. Although these crops are usually in fairly low demand, they are especial- ly suited for growing on farms with limited acreage and for use in niche mar- kets. Muscadines (Vitis rotundifolia Michx.) are grapes native to Arkansas that have tremendous undeveloped market potential as fresh fruit, in processed products, and for the production of nutraceuticals. Muscadines have the advan- tage of not being as seriously affected by disease or insects as other grape species grown in the South; therefore they can be produced with approximately one- half the sprays required by French-American Hybrid or Vitis labruscana grapes. Th ere has been interest from Arkansas wi n eries in expanding com m ercial p l a n t i n g s of mu s c adine gra pes in cen tral and sout h ern Arkansas regi ons wh ere these grapes can be successfully produced. Figure 2. Muscadines are native to Arkansas and have tremendous undeveloped market potential. For a number of years, the Grape and Wine Research Program in the Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, has been involved in work to identify the muscadine cultivars most suitable to commercial production in Arkansas, appropriate handling of these grapes, formulation and production of products from them, and markets for both fresh fruit and processed products. Because approximately 40% of the muscadine fruit is skin and seed, typically considered waste products, efforts are currently underway by some to develop seedless muscadines. Another alternative to reducing the percentage of the fruit that is lost as waste has been to identify uses for the press fraction from musca- dine processing. In recent years it has been found that muscadine seeds and skins contain a number of components--nutraceuticals--which benefit human health. Research to further identify the nutraceutical materials present in mus- 8 MuscadineLayout 10/18/04 11:13 AM Page 9 The Muscadine Experience: Adding Value to Enhance Profits cadine seeds and skins and ways to use and market these waste products is on- going. The Muscadine Grape Few individuals outside of the southern United States are familiar with muscadine grapes (Vitis rotundifolia) since they are native to the southeast United States and not marketed widely in other parts of the country. The grapes have thick skins, large seeds, and a unique, soft, musky-flavored pulp. Cultivars vary in color from almost white, referred to as bronze, to pink, red, blue, pur- ple, and nearly black. Common names for dark-fruited muscadines include bullace, bull grape, and bullet grape (Olien, 2001). The term “scuppernong,” often used to refer to all bronze-fruited varieties, is actually the name of a spe- cific muscadine cultivar. North Carolina claims credit as the place where muscadines were first discovered, citing a 1524 log book of French navigator Giovanni de Verrazano, who was exploring the Cape Fear River Valley, as the first recorded account of the grapes(Anon, 2000). A popular legend credits Sir Walter Raleigh’s colony with discovering the Scuppernong “mother-vine” on Roanoke Island in 1584 and spreading cuttings from it widely, including to the area of the Scuppernong River wh ere , in 1811, it was iden ti f i ed in a news p a per report as the “Scuppernong grape.” Other authorities believe the first discovery of mus- cadines occurred in the mid-18th century along the Scuppernong River and that cuttings from this planting were eventually carried to Roanoke Island, where they became known as the “mother-vine” (Olien, 2001). Although the grape’s history is somewhat unclear, it is known that there is a vine on Roanoke Island that has been in continuous cultivation for nearly 200 years, and today this historic vine has a trunk over two feet thick and covers half an acre. Figure 3. Muscadine cultivars vary in color from almost white or bronze to nearly black. Muscadine grapes need a long growing season since they usually require 100 days on the vine to mature the fruit (Olien, 2002). They grow best on fertile, s a n dy loams and alluvial soils and grow poorly on wet or heavy soi l s . 9 MuscadineLayout 10/18/04 11:13 AM Page 10 AAES Research Report 974 Muscadines are native to the region from Virginia to East Texas and south (Figure 4). Figure 4. Areas in gray represent regions of natu- ral muscadines distribution (Modified from Olien, 2002). Although muscadines grow wild throughout Arkansas (except in the northern counties), they were not produced commercially in the state until 1972 (Moore, 1972). Figures are not available regarding the total acreage of muscadine production in Arkansas; however, it is known that muscadine pro- cessing is occurring in Altus, in the Arkansas River Valley (Clark, 2001), and that there are commercial plantings for fresh market sales in several counties, most notably White County. The flavor and aroma of muscadine grapes are completely different from that of other grapes. The thick skins and seediness of the fruit along with their unique sensory characteristics are sometimes considered unappealing to consumers unfamiliar with these grapes (Leong, 2001). However, consumers who are accustomed to muscadines, or who have developed a taste for them, report that their unique characteristics make them a welcome alternative to the better known “California types” of grapes, giving them a unique niche in the grape market. Those thinking about starting a muscadine vineyard should be aware that they will face a number of marketing challenges unique to these grapes (Leong, 2001). These include: - lack of consumer familiarity with muscadines and muscadine prod- ucts, requiring consumer education and market development; - a restricted market for fresh fruit due to perishability issues and low demand in nontraditional marketing areas; - inadequate formal market standards to associate price and quality. Processing muscadines offers marketing alternatives for the fruit, but the production of muscadine grape products is small compared to that of Concord grapes. Wine continues to be a major market for muscadine grapes in the South. In recent years there has been an increase in interest, especially 10 MuscadineLayout 10/18/04 11:13 AM Page 11 The Muscadine Experience: Adding Value to Enhance Profits among small processors, for the establishment of a market for jam, jelly, and juice from muscadine grapes. However, because processors have not been able to find a reliable supply of a high quality processing muscadine cultivar, jam and jelly production generally has been limited to small specialty packs which do not require large quantities of grapes. Cultivar Selection and Production Considerations Developing a sound plan for marketing crops is critical to the success of any farming operation. Marketing decisions should drive the production dec i s i on s , not vi ce vers a . It is recom m en ded that produ cers iden tify and research marketing opportunities prior to producing a crop (Rainey, 2002). Arkansas is the home of two of the foremost commercial processors of muscadine products, Post Familie Vineyards and Winery and Wiederkehr Wine Cellars, Inc. Other wineries such as Mount Bethel Winery and Cowie Winery also produce muscadine wines. These processors may be willing to purchase muscadines from independent growers, provided the grapes are the appropri- ate varieties and are produced and handled to meet company specifications. If marketing product in this way is a desirable option, then it is important to con- tact the processor(s) prior to planting to ensure that the varieties and produc- tion procedures will be acceptable. Muscadine grapes are adapted to almost any well-drained, moderately fertile soil with a pH of 5.5 to 6.5. The minimum temperature the vines can withstand depends on their vine condition, as well as weather conditions prior to low temperature exposure. Fluctuations of temperatures from high to low can be as damaging as an absolute low temperature because grape vines tend to deaclimate (lose their winter hardiness). It is best to plant muscadines in regions where the temperatures rarely go lower than 0°F. Unlike other grape species and cultivars produced in Arkansas, the width between rows in muscadine vineyards may vary from 9 to 12 feet but is usually 12 feet (Noguera et al., 2004). The minimum spacing between vines in the row is 20 feet. This 9 x 20 foot spacing only requires 242 vines per acre, sig- nificantly fewer than the 544 to 623 plants per acre (depending on species and cultivar) required for Vitis vinifera, Vitis labruscana, and French-American Hybrid cultivars. In addition to information about the number of plants need- ed, Noguera et al. (2004) discuss other financial considerations for establishing a grape vineyard. There are two types of muscadine grape cultivars planted in Arkansas: pistillate, or female flowering types; and self-fertile, or perfect flowering types (Noguera et al., 2004). The pistillate vines have flowers that produce only ovaries (fruit) and contain no anthers or pollen. Pollen for these female flower- ing vines must be provided by interplanting these types with self-fertile plants. 11.
Recommended publications
  • Wine Grape Terminology- the Lingo of Viticulture
    Wine Grape Terminology- The Lingo of Viticulture Dr. Duke Elsner Small Fruit Educator Michigan State University Extension Traverse City, Michigan 2014 Wine Grape Vineyard Establishment Conference Viticulture Terminology Where to start? How far to go? – Until my time runs out! What are grapes? “…thornless, dark-stemmed, green- flowered, mostly shreddy-barked, high-climbing vines that climb by means of tendrils.” Cultivated species of grapes Vitis labrusca – Native to North America – Procumbent shoot growth habit – Concord, Niagara, dozens more Vitis vinifera – Eastern Europe, middle east – Upright shoot growth habit – Riesling, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Gewurztraminer, etc. Other important species of grapes Vitis aestivalis Summer grape Vitis riparia Riverbank grape Vitis rupestris Sand grape Vitis rotundifolia Muscadine grape Vitis cinerea Winter grape Variety A varient form of a wild plant that has been recognized as a true taxon ranking below sub- species. Cultivar A variety of a plant species originating and continuing in cultivation and given a name in modern language. Hybrid Cultivar A new cultivar resulting from the intentional crossing of selected cultivars, varieties or species. Hybrid Cultivar A new cultivar resulting from the intentional crossing of selected cultivars, varieties or species. Clone (clonal selection) A strain of grape cultivar that has been derived by asexual reproduction and presumably has a desirable characteristic that sets it apart from the “parent” variety. Pinot Noir = cultivar Pinot Noir Pommard = clone Grafted vine A vine produced by a “surgical” procedure that connects one or more desired fruiting cultivars onto a variety with desired root characteristics. Scion Above-graft part of a grafted vine, including leaf and fruit-bearing parts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muscadine Grape (Vitis Rotundifolia Michx)1 Peter C
    HS763 The Muscadine Grape (Vitis rotundifolia Michx)1 Peter C. Andersen, Ali Sarkhosh, Dustin Huff, and Jacque Breman2 Introduction from improved selections, and in fact, one that has been found in the Scuppernong River of North Carolina has The muscadine grape is native to the southeastern United been named ‘Scuppernong’. There are over 100 improved States and was the first native grape species to be cultivated cultivars of muscadine grapes that vary in size from 1/4 to in North America (Figure 1). The natural range of musca- 1 ½ inches in diameter and 4 to 15 grams in weight. Skin dine grapes extends from Delaware to central Florida and color ranges from light bronze to pink to purple to black. occurs in all states along the Gulf Coast to east Texas. It also Flesh is clear and translucent for all muscadine grape extends northward along the Mississippi River to Missouri. berries. Muscadine grapes will perform well throughout Florida, although performance is poor in calcareous soils or in soils with very poor drainage. Most scientists divide the Vitis ge- nus into two subgenera: Euvitis (the European, Vitis vinifera L. grapes and the American bunch grapes, Vitis labrusca L.) and the Muscadania grapes (muscadine grapes). There are three species within the Muscadania subgenera (Vitis munsoniana, Vitis popenoei and Vitis rotundifolia). Euvitis and Muscadania have somatic chromosome numbers of 38 and 40, respectively. Vines do best in deep, fertile soils, and they can often be found in adjacent riverbeds. Wild muscadine grapes are functionally dioecious due to incomplete stamen formation in female vines and incom- plete pistil formation in male vines.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Phylloxera-Resistant Grape Stocks in the Vinifera Regions of the United States
    2 5 1.0 :; 1111/2.8. 11111 . 1.0 3 2 Ii.,· 11111 . .2 W J.:.: ~ii£ I.IA.O :itL;:. IUiU I _2.0 '- " 1.1 1.1 LL:.&.:. I 1.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST GHART NAtiONAL BUREAU 1)[ srANDARDS·I96l·A NATIONAL aURE/,U OF STANDARDS-1963·A ==========~==~~~~~========== TECHNICAL BULLETIN No, 14G ~ FEBRUARY, 1930 UNITED STATES DEPAR TMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D, C, TESTING PHYLLOXERA-RESISTANT GRAPE STOCKS IN THE VINIFERA REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES By GEOHGEl C, HUSMANN, Pomolof/ist in ('harge of Grape Investigations, OJlice of Horticultural Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry CONTENTS PUg't' Pugo lulrotiucliotL ________ "__ ._. __ " 1 C'oopt'ratiw exprritllPut Yinr~'arrls-Cotltd, j'hrllo'"n' itl ClIliruruia lIlId in Enrol'''__ ;1 Ot'.Y~{,f\·ilIl' l\.xJlerim('nL viuf.lyard ..... __ MM. 12 E{u'lynllt'mpt~al rp('ul1:o;trttl'(iou uCviuc~'nrds :1 ' (lU~l~ri CX~)(\rillll'Ht \·irll'yurd. _______ .. _.... ~ 12 1+'.1('tOI':-; iII re:--istum'p ~_. _' .. _~ :; l..l\"Pl·U10rl' l'Xpl'rilllent. \~iIleynrd .. ~ __ ~_ .. __ 13 Kutllrc or ph~-lIo"'rn injnrr utHI iubcr,-;lt Lotli (-'.xpl.-'rimeut \·iucynrd___ ~~_, .. ~~~ ___ _ 13 ('!turaptl'l' of tItt' \'iltl~s _ . ~ ~ r ••' ••• __ • _ •• ~[uuntnin Yiew (-'xpcrime!lL vinl'yurd ___ _ H AdHpt:!I!OU to soil, clinmt", lind oUll'" Oakyi1l(' ('xpl-'rimeut. vineranL .... ________ _ 11 ('uud It lUn!, _ _~ ". _ . _ _, _ ~ ~ ~ _.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Program ASEV-ES Full.Pub
    American Society for Enology and Viticulture-Eastern Section 45th Annual Conference Virtual July 7-8, 2021 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.asev-es.org/ Conference Overview Eastern Standard Time Wednesday, July 7, 2021 Preconference 9:30-10:00 am Introductions and Welcome 10:00-10:15 am Invited Speaker 10:15-11:00 am Encouraging Promotion and Success in Grape and Wine Industries Doniella Winchell, Ohio Wine Producers ASEV-ES Technical Sessions & Student Presentation Competition 11:00 am-12:00 pm Break and View/Judge Posters 12:00-12:30 pm ASEV-ES Business Meeting 12:30-1:30 pm Break and View/Judge Posters 1:30-2:00 pm ASEV-ES Technical Sessions & Student Presentation Competition 2:00-3:30 pm ASEV-ES Poster Flash Talks & Poster Summaries 3:30-4:00 pm Concurrent Poster Sessions Breakout 4:00–5:00 pm Thursday, July 8, 2021 Preconference 9:30-10:00 am Introductions and Welcome 10:00-10:15 am Invited Panel 10:15 am-12:00 pm Future Grape Cultivars for Eastern North American Growers Panel: Dr. Matthew Clark, University of Minnesota, Dr. Joseph Fiola, University of Maryland Extension, Dr. Oliver Trap, Institute for Grapevine Breeding, and Dr. Daniel Ward, Rutgers University Break and View/Judge Posters 12:00-12:30 pm ASEV-ES Technical Sessions & Student Presentation Competition 12:30-1:30 pm Break and View Posters 1:30-2:00 pm ASEV-ES Technical Sessions & Student Presentation Competition 2:00-3:30 pm ASEV-ES Poster Flash Talks & Poster Summaries 3:30-4:00 pm Wines of the East Virtual Reception and Awards 4:00-5:00 pm ASEV-ES Conference Sponsors Sponsors are recognized throughout the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Sixtyfirst61 National Conference a Platform for Progress
    science sixtyfirst61 national conference a platform for progress 61st ASEV National Conference June 20–24, 2010 Washington State Convention Center Seattle, Washington USA TECHNICAL ABSTRACTS american society for enology and viticulture 2010 National Conference Technical Abstracts Oral Abstracts (Research Reports) Wednesday, June 23 Wine Microbiology ...............................................................................................41–43 Cultural Practices ..................................................................................................44–46 General Enology ....................................................................................................47–48 Irrigation/Soils/Nutrition ......................................................................................49–51 Thursday, June 24 Phenolics ...............................................................................................................52–54 Vine Composition and Environmental Viticulture ................................................55–57 Wine Aroma/Sensory ............................................................................................58–59 General Viticulture ................................................................................................60–61 Poster Abstracts (Research Reports) Wednesday, June 23 and Thursday, June 24 Enology .................................................................................................................62–72 Viticulture ............................................................................................................73–90
    [Show full text]
  • "The Muscadine Grape: Botany, Viticulture, History, and Current
    FEATURE The Muscadine Grape: Botany, Viticulture, History, and Current Industry William C. Olien1 U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Small Fruit Research Station, Box 287, Poplarville, MS 39470 The muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia grape found in India has similar characteristics is the name of a specific cultivar. Michx.) was the first American grape spe- to the Muscudinia (Syamal and Patel, 1953) The natural range of V. rotundifolia ex- cies to be cultivated. This fruit has a long and may reflect the pre-ice age distribution of tends from Delaware to central Florida and history in commercial and backyard culture. this group. along the Gulf of Mexico to eastern Texas Picking muscadines to enjoy as juice along Muscadinia grapes have 40 somatic chro- (L.H. Bailey Hortorium, 1976; Dearing, with muscadine pie on grandmother’s back mosomes (2x = 2n = 40) and are charac- 1938; Munson, 1909; Weaver, 1976). The porch has a strong place in childhood mem- terized by fruit borne in many clusters with species extends north along the Mississippi ories of many native Southerners. The oldest few berries per cluster, formation of an ab- River to Missouri and near the Appalachian and most consistent commercial interest in scission zone between the fruit and rachis, Mountains from the east and west. Temper- muscadines has been in wine, but juice and smooth thin bark that is adherent on young atures in this region seldom go lower than fresh fruit markets have also been devel- wood and separates in scales from older wood, - 12C and more rarely to - 18C (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Wine in North Carolina: Terroir, Site Selection Efficacy, and Implications for Pierce’S Disease Resistant Grape Varieties in the Southeastern U.S
    NOWLIN, JOHN W., Ph.D. The Geography of Wine in North Carolina: Terroir, Site Selection Efficacy, and Implications for Pierce’s Disease Resistant Grape Varieties in the Southeastern U.S. (2017) Directed by Dr. Rick Bunch 138 pp. North Carolina has a broad range of physical environments that produce wine from a breadth of grape species/varietals. Its wine industry has grown rapidly for over a decade and the nature of its climates, soils, and topography are varied and unique in the wine world, yet North Carolina remains relatively unknown outside of the Southeastern portion of the United States. In this study, North Carolina’s vineyards and their specific site characteristics were considered both on the basis of their terroir and the extent to which they followed extension agency advice on site selection. One characteristic risk of growing grapes in the Southeastern U.S. is a plant illness known as Pierce's Disease, which is deadly to the vines of Vitis vinifera parentage. This research used a novel method to reveal the dividing line between V. vinifera and Pierce’s Disease resistant grape variety suitability zones across the Southeast. The quantification of the physical elements of terroir and test of the effectiveness of vineyard site selection has revealed the character of North Carolina’s wine regions and commercial vineyards. In addition, the modeling of the Southeastern U.S. Pierce's Disease zone provided clarification on where Pierce’s Disease resistant winegrapes might present new wine industry options for vineyards across the Southeastern U.S. KEYWORDS: Wine, North Carolina; Southeastern U.S.; Terroir; GIS; Applied Geography; Viticulture; Site Selection; Site Suitability THE GEOGRAPHY OF WINE IN NORTH CAROLINA: TERROIR, SITE SELECTION EFFICACY, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PIERCE’S DISEASE RESISTANT GRAPE VARIETIES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Abstracts
    52nd Annual Meeting Technical Abstracts Oral and Poster Presentations The American Society for Enology and Viticulture San Diego, California June 28 - 30, 2001 Copyright © 2001. All abstracts herein appear as submitted by the author(s). The American Society for Enology and Viticulture is not responsible for incorrect listings or typographical errors. The ASEV Annual Meeting and related documents are the property of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture. Reproduction of any part of the ASEV Annual Meeting in any form without written consent is strictly prohibited. All presentations of any form are exclusive and released only to the ASEV and its recording contractor for reproduction in any format including electronic/internet distribution. The ASEV is not responsible for statements or opinions printed in its publications; they represent the views of the authors or persons to whom they are credited and are not binding on the ASEV as a whole. The mention of products or services in the ASEV 52nd Annual Meeting Technical Abstracts does not imply endorsement of these or other products. Alphabetical Listing of Presenting Authors These abstracts in approximate order of presentation as noted in our conference program. There are no abstracts for the Experimental Design Workshop. *indicates Poster Presentation Agosin, E. ............................................. 43 Kupina, S. ........................................... *54 Agüero, C. ............................... *74, *75 López, I............................................... *65
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Drivers of Muscadine Wine Purchase Decisions
    beverages Article Consumer Drivers of Muscadine Wine Purchase Decisions Bonnie Canziani *, Erick T. Byrd and James S. Boles Department of Marketing, Entrepreneurship, Hospitality, and Tourism, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA; [email protected] (E.T.B.); [email protected] (J.S.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +01-336-334-4471 Received: 5 October 2018; Accepted: 28 November 2018; Published: 3 December 2018 Abstract: Muscadine wine, fresh muscadine grapes, and other derivatives have enjoyed a heritage niche for decades in the Southeast. Muscadine growers in North Carolina in the United States (US) have asked whether the purchase of muscadine wine is linked to consumption of the fruit itself or even familiarity with other muscadine-based products in terms of spillover effects. The authors explored the interdependency between the market for fresh muscadine grapes and muscadine wine purchase. Consumer panel data were obtained from a State of North Carolina agency with oversight of the grape and wine industry; the agency contracted quota sampling of online consumers from six states in the US South. A total of 543 cases were used in the present study. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)® was employed in analysis. Results show that prior muscadine wine knowledge and knowledge of other muscadine products, e.g., jams, juices, smoothies, sauces, and health/beauty products were significant factors associated with buying muscadine wine. Beliefs about muscadine grapes as a healthy ingredient showed a slight influence, while direct experience with fresh muscadines and consumer attitudes towards buying local or US products were insignificant.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscadine (Vitis Rotundifolia Michx., Syn
    agriculture Review Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia Michx., syn. Muscandinia rotundifolia (Michx.) Small): The Resilient, Native Grape of the Southeastern U.S Cain C. Hickey 1,*, Erick D. Smith 2, Shanshan Cao 2 and Patrick Conner 2 1 Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, 322 Hoke Smith Building, Athens, GA 30602, USA 2 Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, 2360 Rainwater Road, Tifton, GA 31793, USA; [email protected] (E.D.S.); [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (P.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-706-542-1774 Received: 19 April 2019; Accepted: 15 June 2019; Published: 22 June 2019 Abstract: Angiosperms are well adapted to tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses in their native environment. However, the growth habit of native plants may not be suited for cultivation and their fruits may not be desirable for consumption. Adapting a plant for cultivation and commercial appeal through breeding and selection may accentuate weaknesses in pest tolerance. The transition of muscadine from a wild, native plant to a cultivated crop has taken place over the last 150 years. Early production primarily involved cloning elite wild selections; few pest management inputs were needed since the material was genetically similar to the native plant. Over time, emphasis was placed on the refinement of pruning, trellising, and other cultural inputs to increase productivity and commercial implementation. In turn, breeders developed newer cultivars with greater productivity and commercial appeal. Many modern muscadine cultivars remain tolerant to biotic pests and are adapted to a hot and humid climate. The primary focus of this review is to provide a descriptive context of muscadine as a native American, perennial fruit crop that requires minimal pest management in hot, humid climates relative to recently introduced European bunch grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Grape Chitinase Activities in Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon with Vitis Rotundifolia Cv
    Research Note Comparison of Grape Chitinase Activities in Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon with Vitis rotundifolia cv. Fry Steven Van Sluyter,l Michael J. D~rako,~and Christopher J. Halkides3* Abstract: Fungal resistance in Euvitis is generally correlated with levels of pathogenesis-related proteins such as chitinase. Vitis rotundifolia is resistant to many pathogens that affect Vitis vinifera; therefore, grape chitinase ac- tivities were compared in V rotundifolia cv. Fry and V vinifera cvs. Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay. Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay chitinase activities were approximately 130-fold and 80-fold higher than Fry activi- ties, respectively. Thus, the high pathogen resistance of Fry may be a result of factors other than chitinase. By sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), Fry berries had two chitinase isoforms, and at least one was not found in the V vinifera berries. Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay had four and five chitinase isoforms, respectively. Key words: chitinase, muscadine, pathogenesis, protein Vitis rotundifolia grapevines, commonly called musca- proteins consistently identified as chitinases and thau- dines, are native to the southeastern United States and are matin-like proteins (Derckel et al. 1998, Hayasaka et al. resistant to many diseases that affect Vitis vinifera, such 2001, Pocock et al. 2000, Salzman et al. 1998, Tattersall et as Xylella fastidiosa, Botrytis cinerea, and Plasmopara al. 1997). In comparisons among Euvitis cultivars of vary- viticola (Galet and Morton 1988, Staudt and Kassemeyer ing fungal susceptibility, positive correlations between 1995). The most striking physical differences between V. fungal resistance in the field and chitinase activities rotundifolia and V vinifera are that muscadine grapes are against synthetic substrates have been observed (Busam large with thick skins and that they grow in loose clusters et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule Overview
    Schedule Overview Date Time Session Topic Sunday August 1 6:00-9:00 PM Welcome reception (at Smith Opera House) Monday August 2 8:30-8:40 AM Opening Comments 8:40-10:05 AM Oral Session 1 Pest and Disease Resistance I 10:35-12:30 PM Oral Session 2 Pest and Disease Resistance II 12:30-1:30 PM (lunch at Scandling Center) 1:30-3:00 PM Poster Session 1 Berry quality; Adaptation to soils and climates; Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics; and Transgenic research 3:00-5:40 PM Oral Session 3 Grapevine Breeding: Techniques, Goals, and Strategies Tuesday August 3 8:00-10:10 AM Oral Session 4 Genomics, Transcriptomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics I 10:40-12:35 PM Oral Session 5 Genomics, Transcriptomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics II 12:15-1:15 PM (lunch at Scandling Center) 1:30-6:00 PM Field Tour of NYS Agricultural Experiment Station, USDA-ARS units 6:30 PM- ? "Dinosaur Bar B Que" at Station Pavilion Wednesday August 4 8:00-10:10 AM Oral Session 6 Abiotic and Biotic Stress Tolerance 10:40-12:35 PM Oral Session 7 Genetics of Fruit Quality & Transgenic Research 12:35-1:30 PM (lunch at Scandling Center) 1:30-3:00 PM Poster Session 2 Grapevine germplasm: Conservation and analysis; Breeding techniques, goals and strategies; Pest and disease resistance 4:00 PM Departure for evening banquet; winery stop en route 6:00 PM Arrival at Watkins Glen Harbor Hotel, reception, wine tasting 7:00 PM Dinner, entertainment by "Cool Club" 10:00 PM Return to Geneva Thursday August 5 8:00-10:00 AM Oral Session 8 Grapevine Genetic Resources - Parentage,
    [Show full text]