WSHEMA State Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WSHEMA State Overview WSHEMA State Overview Presented by: Bernie Kushnir State Equipment Manager Wyoming Department of Transportation June 11, 2014 History of WSHEMA • Early in 1969, the State Highway Equipment/Fleet Managers from Oregon and Arizona were discussing, by phone, some equipment matters. During the discussion, the Arizona manager who was new to the job indicated that it would be great if many states could get together and discuss these matters simultaneously. • The State Highway Equipment Managers from Washington, Oregon and California were participating in a short program on equipment at a Western Association of State Highway Officials’ meeting. The subject of a Western Equipment Group meeting surfaced again and they said ‘let’s do it’. With the blessing of the State Highway Engineers from local states, the first WSHEMA group met and organized in the fall of 1969 in a hotel at the San Francisco airport. Equipment Managers from Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Hawaii attended the first meeting. 2 History of WSHEMA • On a rotational basis, WSHEMA has met every year since 1969 in various states. States that are currently a part of the Association are: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Prior to the formation of the Southeastern Group, Texas participated as part of the Western Group from the mid 70’s to the mid 80’s. • The members of the association are made up the of the principal State Highway (DOT) Equipment Fleet Managers. Fleet Operations and Repair Managers and/or Equipment Supply – Purchasing Managers also attend. The emphasis of the Group, initially, was to focus on Fleet related matters that included operation, shop management, specifications, warranties, parts, supplies and personnel. A principal area of concern was conflicting and marginal information from manufacturers and suppliers. 3 History of WSHEMA • The meetings were to be free of any personnel from manufacturing and supply industries, unless they were asked to attend for a specific subject. Upon completion of the subject addressed, these industry representatives had to leave the meeting. Also, this Group/Association would NOT be a part of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) program. State Highway and DOT administrators agreed that they best stand alone, for many reasons. • Members saw the advantages of their Western Group/Association and assisted other states with the formation of other Groups/Associations. 4 Low and High Elevations by State Low Point High Point State Elevation Location Elevation Location Alaska Sea Level Pacific Ocean 20,320 ft. Mt. McKinley Arizona 72 ft. Colorado River 12,637 ft. Humphrey Peak California (282 ft.) Death Valley 14,505 ft. Mt. Whitney Colorado 3,317 ft. Arikaree River 14,440 ft. Mt. Elbert Hawaii Sea Level Pacific Ocean 13,796 ft. Mauna Kea Idaho 713 ft. Lewiston, ID 12,662 ft. Borah Park Oregon Sea Level Pacific Ocean 11,249 ft. Mt. Hood Montana 1,804 ft. Kootenah River 12,807 ft. Granite Peak Nevada 481 ft. Colorado River 13,147 ft. Boundary Peak New Mexico 2,844 ft. Red Bluff Reservoir 13,167 ft. Wheeler Peak Utah 2,180 ft. Beaver Dam Wash 13,518 ft. Kings Peak Washington Sea Level Pacific Ocean 14,411 ft. Mt. Ranier Wyoming 3,101 ft. Belle Fourche River 13,809 ft. Gannett Peak 5 State Information State Square Miles Population Lane-Miles* Alaska 663,268 735,132 14,800 Arizona 113,990 6,626,624 27,722 California 163,000 38,332,521 49,000 Colorado 104,094 5,268,367 23,061 Hawaii 10,931 1,404,054 2,450 Idaho 83,570 1,595,728 12,000 Oregon 98,381 3,899,353 19,089 Montana 147,042 1,005,141 24,500 Nevada 110,622 2,758,931 13,368 New Mexico 121,589 2,085,538 30,781 Utah 84,899 2,900,822 17,968 Washington 71,300 6,971,406 20,000 Wyoming 97,814 582,658 15,577 *Lane-miles measure the total distance of all roadway lanes. 6 United States = 3,794,000 Square Miles WSHEMA = 1,870,500 Square Miles 7 ALASKA ALASKA 8 ARIZONA ARIZONA 9 CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 10 COLORADO COLORADO 11 HAWAII HAWAII 12 IDAHO IDAHO 13 MONTANA MONTANA 14 NEVADA NEVADA 15 NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO 16 OREGON OREGON 17 UTAH UTAH 18 WASHINGTON WASHINGTON 19 WYOMING WYOMING 20 2013 WSHEMA Conference - Utah 21 Thank you! Bernie Kushnir State Equipment Manager Wyoming Department of Transportation 5300 Bishop Blvd., Cheyenne, WY 82009 307-777-4061 [email protected] 22 .
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • High-Elevation Five Needle Pine Cone Collections in California and Nevada
    High-elevation white pine cone collections from the Great Basin of Nevada, California, & Utah on National Forest, Bureau of Land Management, National Park, and State lands, 2009 – 2013. Collected 40-50 cones/tree. 2009 (all on NFS land): 3 sites # trees Schell Creek Range, Cave Mtn., NV Pinus longaeva 100 Spring Mtns., Lee Canyon, NV Pinus longaeva 100 White Mtns., Boundary Peak, NV Pinus longaeva 100 2010 (all on NFS land except as noted): 7 sites Carson Range, Mt. Rose, NV Pinus albicaulis 23 Hawkins Peak, CA Pinus albicaulis 26 Luther Creek, CA Pinus lambertiana 15 Monitor Pass, CA Pinus lambertiana 25 Pine Forest Range, NV [BLM] Pinus albicaulis 20 Sweetwater Mtns., NV Pinus albicaulis 20 Wassuk Range, Corey Pk., NV [BLM] Pinus albicaulis 25 2011 (all on NFS land except as noted): 13 sites Fish Creek Range, NV [BLM] Pinus flexilis 25 Fish Creek Range, NV [BLM] Pinus longaeva 25 Grant Range, NV Pinus flexilis 25 Highland Range, NV [BLM] Pinus longaeva 25 Independence Mtns., NV Pinus albicaulis 17 Jarbidge Mtns., NV Pinus albicaulis 25 Pequop Mtns., NV [BLM] Pinus longaeva 25 Ruby Mtns., Lamoille Canyon, NV Pinus albicaulis 25 Ruby Mtns., Lamoille Canyon, NV Pinus flexilis 20 Schell Creek Range, Cave Mtn., NV Pinus flexilis 25 Sweetwater Mtns., NV Pinus flexilis 25 White Pine Range, Mt. Hamilton, NV Pinus flexilis 25 White Pine Range, Mt. Hamilton, NV Pinus longaeva 25 2012 (all on NFS land except as noted): 9 sites Black Mountain, Inyo NF, CA Pinus longaeva 23 Carson Range, LTBMU, NV Pinus albicaulis 25 Egan Range, Toiyabe NF, NV Pinus longaeva 25 Emma Lake, Toiyabe NF, CA Pinus albicaulis 25 Happy Valley, Fishlake NF, UT Pinus longaeva 25 Inyo Mtns., Tamarack Canyon, CA Pinus longaeva 25 Leavitt Lake, Toiyabe NF, CA Pinus albicaulis 25 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINT 48-Peak Challenge
    48-Peak Challenge SEPTEMBER 1ST - DECEMBER 9TH ATTEMPT TO CLIMB TO ALL OF THE HIGHEST POINTS EACH WALL CLIMB IS 47 FEET IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES Katahdin (5,268 feet) Mount Rainier (14,411 feet) WA Eagle Mountain (2,301 feet) ME Mount Arvon (1,978 feet) Mount Mansfield (4,393 feet) Mount Hood (11,239 feet) Mount Washington (6,288 feet) MT White Butte (3,506 feet) ND VT MN Granite Peak (12,799 feet) NH Mount Marcy (5,344 feet) Borah Peak (12,662 feet) OR Timms Hill (1,951 feet) WI NY MA ID Gannett Peak (13,804 feet) SD CT Hawkeye Point (1,670 feet) RI MI Charles Mount (1,235 feet) WY Harney Peak (7,242 feet) Mount Davis (3,213 feet) PA CT: Mount Frissell (2,372 feet) IA NJ DE: Ebright Azimuth (442 feet) Panorama Point (5,426 feet) Campbell Hill (1,549 feet) Kings Peak (13,528 feet) MA: Mount Greylock (3,487 feet) NE OH MD DE MD: Backbone Mountain (3360 feet) Spruce Knob (4,861 feet) NV IN NJ: High Point (1,803 feet) Boundary Peak (13,140 feet) IL Mount Elbert (14,433 feet) Mount Sunflower (4,039 feet) Hoosier Hill (1,257 feet) WV RI: Jerimoth Hill (812 feet) UT CO VA Mount Whitney (14,498 feet) Black Mountain (4,139 feet) KS Mount Rogers (5,729 feet) CA MO KY Taum Sauk Mountain (1,772 feet) Mount Mitchell (6,684 feet) Humphreys Peak (12,633 feet) Wheeler Peak (12,633 feet) Clingmans Dome (6,643 feet) NC Sassafras Mountain (3,554 feet) Black Mesa (4,973 feet) TN Woodall Mountain (806 Feet) OK AR SC AZ NM Magazine Mountain (2,753 feet) Brasstown Bald (4,784 feet) GA AL Driskill Mountain (535MS feet) Cheaha Mountain (2,405 feet) Guadalupe Peak (8,749 feet) TX LA Britton Hill (345 feet) FL Start the challenge by reaching the peak of Britton Hill, Florida, the lowest state peak, with just seven climbs (345 feet).
    [Show full text]
  • National Geographic's National Conservation Lands 15Th
    P ow ear Pt. Barr d B 5 ay Bellingham Ross Lake E ison Bay Harr PACIFIC NORT S HWES Cape Flattery t San Juan T N ra Islands AT i I LisburneCape N o t SAN JUAN ISLANDS ONAL S r t h S l o p e of CE P Ju N IC a NATIONAL MONUMENT T e F N 9058 ft KMt. Isto Cape Alava n R CANADA KCopper Butte n 61 m d A l . lvill 27 e a L B o e F I d F U.S. C u L 7135 ft t M o Central Arctic c o d R a 2175 m O K h i r l g Management o e r k k e O E Priest o a e 2 C Area G t d O 101 i L. e r K N l . A n S P S R l 95 as K i e r E a 93 Ma o ot Central Arctic a i p z a L i e l b Management KGlacier Pk. Lake E a 97 b W IS A 15 ue Mt. Olympus K l N r Area STEESE 10541 ft D S Chelan m o CANADA 7965 ft i 89 Cape Prince NATIONAL 3213 m C 2 u uk 2428 m 2 u n k Franklin D. l L Lake Elwell d CONSERVATION U.S. s A of Wales u r R R Roosevelt o K oy AREA Y Bureau of Land Management e C h K u L lle N I ei h AT 191 Seward k Lake 2 Or s ION IC TRAIL 2 o A d R 395 Pen i A O L.
    [Show full text]
  • Comment on Recommended Wilderness!
    Comment on Recommended Wilderness! A primer for writing your own comments to the Forest Service OVERVIEW The Salmon-Challis National Forest is the largest forest in the state, and contains some of its wildest remaining unroaded areas, such as the Lost River Range, Pioneer Mountains, and Lemhi Range. Forest planning is the process through which the Forest Service determines which areas ​ ​ have the highest and best wilderness value and thus should be considered by Congress for future conservation. The Forest Service would like to know if you think that any specific areas on ​ the Salmon-Challis should be recommended for formal wilderness protection. Federally ​ ​ designated wilderness remains the gold standard for protecting wild places on our public lands! HOW YOU CAN HELP: SPEAK UP TODAY! If you have 5 minutes... Use the webmap commenting tool to write a quick comment linked to a particular area, or write a ​ ​ general comment in support of recommended wilderness through the ICL Take Action center. ​ ​ If you have 15 minutes... Write multiple comments through the webmap tool or a longer comment through the Take Action ​ ​ ​ page where you share a meaningful experience you’ve had in the wilderness evaluation areas. ​ ​ ​ If you have 30 minutes... Write a more detailed comment that shares personal stories and touches upon several areas under consideration for recommended wilderness. Submit via email ([email protected]). ​ ​ COMMENT WRITING TIPS ● Make it personal. Personal stories are more powerful because they show that you have a ​ tangible connection to these places. Draw upon your own experiences to express why certain places are important to you and why they should be recommended as wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Ttu Gs0001 000144.Pdf (9.792Mb)
    NOT FOR CIRCULATION Elevations and Distances in the United States The information in this booklet was compiled to answer inquiries received by the U.S. Geological Survey from students; teachers; writers; editors; pub­ lishers of encyclopedias, almanacs, and other reference books; and people in many other fields of work. The elevations of features and distances between points in the United States were determined from surveys and topographic maps of the U.S. Geological Survey or obtained from other sources. In most cases, the elevations were determined from surveys and from 1:24,000- and 1 :25,000-scale, 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle maps. In Alaska, infor­ mation was taken from 1:63,360-scale, 15-minute topographic quadrangle maps. In a few cases, data were obtained from older, 1:62,500-scale, 15-minute maps; these maps are being replaced with larger-scale 7.5-minute coverage. Further information about U.S. Geological Survey products can be obtained from: U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Science In­ formation Center, 507 National Center! Reston, VA 22092 or phone 703-860-6045. 3 Elevations of the 50 Largest Cities (by population, 1980 Census) City State Rank High Low feet feet New York New York 410 Sea Level 1 Chicago Illinois 2 673 579 Los Angeles California 3 5,074 Sea Level Philadelphia Pennsylvania 4 441 Sea Level Houston Texas 5 83 Sea Level Detroit Michigan 6 672 1575 Dallas Texas 7 686 390 San Diego California 8 823 Sea Level Phoenix Arizona 9 1,160 1,058 Baltimore Maryland 10 489 Sea Level San Antonio Texas 11 1,000 505 Indianapolis Indiana 12 845 664 San Francisco California 13 934 Sea Level Memphis Tennessee 14 335 195 Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Plan Revision Zone Idaho Panhandle National Forests
    95 21 6 R 32 W R 31 W R 34 W R 33 W R 3 E R 1 W R 1 E R 2 E R 44 E R 45 E R 5 W B R I T I S H R 4 W C O L U M B I A, R 3 W C A N A D A R 2 W Porthill Blue Joe Mountain Canida Peak Stein Mountain Harvey Mountain Eastport 3 5a Mission Mountain Border Mountain 1b A Northwest W A S H I N G T O N I D A H O 5b Hogue Mountain Peak N O Copper Mountain T 65 N A Little Snowy Top Hall Mountain H 6 k T 37 N T 64 N T Salmo Mountain e 3 e r R 2 E A R 34 W C e N 1b o J D 3 e Silver Mountain Italian Peak I u O T 40 N 1b l k e B 1 5a Saddle Mountain r e 3 C 95 h M Grass Mountain i t Gypsy Peak Continental Mountain S m 2b k Lone Tree Peak e 6 Salmo Priest e Shorty Peak r 6 5 C 6 5a Garver Mountain Leola Peak s s 5 1b a 5 Shedroof Mountain r G re e k Ruby Mountain C w 5 C o Northwest 1b U Tungsten Mountain p Peak p i o s s n 6 e i r M C P 5 r e ek Bethlehem Mountain 1e r Trapper Peak Rock Candy Mountain i e Red Top 6 s k t e Prouty Peak R e Bussard Mountain i r M T 64 N v r e e k k C C e o 3 e r r e r n y a C e d o i C y r e e Eneas Peak n k R a r Green Bonnet Mountain Queen Mountain i Joe Peak 5 C a v T 64 N T 36 N g P e r Thunder Mountain n K 1b o Parker Peak R 3 E R 34 W Phoebe Tip L o T 39 N 1b o 6 1a t Fisher Peak e Hensley Hill n 4a a 5a i S A L M O R Lake Mountain i v 1b 1b e r 2b P R I E S T 5 6 Wall Mountain 2b H BOUNDARY COUNTY Farnham Peak u g h e BONNER COUNTY 5 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Elevations and Distances in the United
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 241 333 SE 044 120 TITLE Elevations and Distances in the United States. INSTITUTION Geological Survey (Dept. of Interior), Reston, Va. PUB DATE 80 NOTE 13p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Geographic Materials (133) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Charts; *Distance; Earth Science; *Geographic Location; Geography; *Height; Instructional Materials; Physical Divisions (Geographic); *Physical Geography; *Proximity; Secondary Education; Tables (Data); Topography; Urban Areas IDENTIFIERS PF Project; Rocky Mountains; *United States ABSTRACT One of a series of general interest publications on science topics, the booklet proviees those interested in elevations and distances with a nontechnical introduction to the subject. The entire document consists of statistical charts depicting the nation's 50 largest cities, extreme and mean elevations, elevations of named summits over 14,000 feet above sea level, elevations of selected summits east of the Rocky Mountains, distances from extreme points to geographic centers, and lengths of United States boundaries. The elevations of features and distances between pbints in the United States were determined from surveys and topographic maps of the U.S. Geological Survey. (LH) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** . r Mee Notion's principal conservation agency, the Department AIthe *hider hoe responsibility for most of our nationally owned -MOM lends sad n,.twal ammo. This includes fostering the Elevations 'MN* Use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and ilitillie,:ermervinj the emoironmentsi and cultural values of our and Distances Malone parks sad.historlcM places, and providing for the enjoy- s _meat of life tha.: oh outdoor recrecion.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Peak Ascent the High Point of Nevada Trip Notes
    Boundary Peak Ascent The High Point of Nevada Trip Notes 2.18 Boundary Peak Ascent Since Boundary Peak straddles the border between Nevada and California it can be debated if it is truly a Nevada Peak, but it is accepted as being the high point of Nevada. (The highest point totally within the state is Wheeler Peak near Ely.) What cannot be debated is that it is a great desert peak climb complete with wild horses, expansive views and bristlecone pines. And at 13,140 feet in height it is on par with many Sierra Peaks and is a tremendous viewpoint looking far to the east over the seemingly endless basins and ranges of Nevada. Our route is primarily a use trail, or no trail at all, with talus hopping and easy scrambling. Itinerary The ascent can be done in a long day but we prefer to camp the night before near the base to reduce the driving time on our ascent day. A 4x4 vehicle is also needed to make the closest approach and we arrange that for you - no need to try and coax the Prius up a bad road. Since we drive to about 9850 feet and then hike from there any time you can spend beforehand camping at 7-8,000 feet will also significantly aid in your acclimatization. Day 1: Meet in Bishop and then drive to a car camp at about 8000 feet in Queen Canyon north of Benton just over the border into Nevada. This is about a 50 mile drive from Bishop.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012 Official Highway Map Highway 21 3 Wells (1,515)
    to SUSANVILLE 78 mi. to PYRAMID LAKE 23 mi. to PYRAMID LAKE 18 mi. to TONOPAH 189 mi. to ST GEORGE 98 mi. LAKE TAHOE REGION 2 445 Snow Desert National Wildlife Range 0246810 mi Peavine Spanish Springs Mtn 95 Peak LEMMON Airport Indian El 8266 4 Road Conditions 5 RenoStead 6 445 Reservation Floyd Lamb 04 812 16 km Airport EAGLE Park Phone (Toll Free)............................ DR 5 3 C Nellis A RD 2 3 N RD LEMMON 4 2 Y 1.3 100 106 O Air Force DR BLVD N Outside Nevada.....................(877) NVROADS RED ROCK RD ECHO AVE 425 2 Sparks VALLEY Base 58 (877) 687- 6237 3 KYLE CANYON10 North TAHOE WY 98 DR GRAND 1.2 Las Vegas Verdi TETON R Web Site............................www.nvroads.com Mogul BLVD 157 D 3 to FERNLEY 17 mi. LEAR AI 1 River BLVD 12.8 395 BLVD BELTW Stampede MILITARY ELKHORN 215 AY Reno T WY 93 r 1.7 to QUINCY 53 mi. Reservoir uc e LA POSADA DR Las Vegas Dunes Radio Frequencies 4 Reno-Tahoe k e HUALAP 12 54 6.4 604 MOYA DURANGO S Airport RD P 3 PKWY E BLVD E Recreation Lands Carson City ........................................1610 AM NATIONAL 7 ALIANTE CENTENNIAL PKWY DW TEYANA NORTHERN A 6 1 CENTENNIAL 52 Y 103 BLV 2 BLVD PABCO Lake Tahoe...........................................530 AM ST RD 11 VD 10.3 D Verdi Peak 395 STEAD BLVD ANN RD BL Las Vegas Las Vegas ..........................................1610 AM El 8444 ANN RD Independence to SUSANVILLE 72 mi. Motor HUMBOLDT- HOLLYWOOD BLVD STOREY 2.3 H O Lake 89 SIERRA WASHOE PACIFIC IG RD Reno ....................................................530 AM N VIR H DR N Speedway Nellis 32 NION 10 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusive Content
    EXCLUSIVE CONTENT EDITORS’ PICKS GET INSPIRED, GET INFORMED, AND GET GOING WITH OUR FAVORITE LONG READS FROM 2014-2019. schoolteacher. Her shoulder-length brown hair bordered full, rose-colored cheeks and wild, hungry-looking eyes. She car- ried a small backpack, loaded with a beat-up sleeping bag, a one-person tent, a Therm-a-Rest, a wispy rain jacket and wool baselayers, a compact headlamp, 6 liters of water, and snack food pre-portioned into small meals. The next morning, June 8, 2013, Barney, Sandy, and Anish piled into the Manns’ Prius at 5 a.m., and drove the 75 miles to the trailhead in Campo, California, near the Mexican border. Nobody spoke as they pulled up to the monu- ment, four weathered pillars of wood at the start of the PCT. More than 2,500 trail miles—crossing desert, forest, canyons, and mountain after moun- tain—lie between this spot and Canada. As Anish had told the Manns, she planned to hike that dis- tance faster than anybody ever had. She gathered her belongings while Sandy took a few photos and said goodbye. “She seemed very confident, but there was no braggadocio,” Sandy recalls. At 6:27 a.m., Anish signed the trail register: Well, here goes. To Canada. –Anish. In the previous two months, hundreds of hik- ers had signed the register. But Anish wasn’t like them, and none of them knew she was coming. In time, everyone on the trail would know her name. She wasn’t like the rest of them. ¶ They knew that.
    [Show full text]