The English Chalk and London Clay: Two Remarkable British Bony Fish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The English Chalk and London Clay: Two Remarkable British Bony Fish Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 The English Chalk and London Clay: two remarkable British bony fish Lagersta¨tten MATT FRIEDMAN1*, HERMIONE T. BECKETT1, ROGER A. CLOSE1 & ZERINA JOHANSON2 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Park Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK 2Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: The Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Maastrichtian) Chalk Group and Eocene (Ypre- sian) London Clay Formation are two British marine deposits that yield globally significant assem- blages of fossil actinopterygian (ray-finned) fishes. Materials from these units, especially the Chalk, featured prominently in the work of Arthur Smith Woodward. Here we summarize the history of study of actinopterygian fossils from the Chalk and London Clay, review their geological and palaeoenvironmental context and provide updated faunal lists. The Chalk and London Clay are remarkable for preserving fossil fishes in three dimensions rather than as the flattened individ- uals familiar from many other famous Lagersta¨tten, as well as capturing detailed ‘snapshots’ of marine fish faunas that bracket the major taxonomic shift that took place near the Cretaceous– Palaeogene boundary. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. The Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian–Maastrichtian) symposium volume. Responsible for the world’s English Chalk and Eocene (Ypresian) London Clay finest collection of fossil fishes from these locali- are two fossiliferous British marine deposits that ties at what is now the Natural History Museum, are significant in the history of palaeontology gener- London, Smith Woodward produced numerous ac- ally, and palaeoichthyology specifically. Fossils counts of Chalk and London Clay specimens (e.g. from both units featured prominently in early contri- Woodward 1887a, b, 1888a–d, 1889a–e, 1891a, b, butions that played a major part in the develop- 1893a, b, 1894a, b, 1895a–c, 1898, 1899a–c, ment of modern geology and palaeontology (Luidii 1900a, b, 1901, 1902, 1903, 1905, 1906a, b, 1907a, (¼Lhuyd) 1699; Woodward 1729; Jacobs 1777a, b; b, 1908, 1909, 1911, 1912a, b, 1913, 1917, 1923, Mantell 1822; Agassiz 1833–44; Fig. 1; Owen & 1926, 1936; Woodward & Sherborn 1890, 1891), Bell 1849). Fossil fishes from the English Chalk naming numerous species in the process (see Smith served as touchstones in early debates on the succes- 2015). A handful of major contributions added to sion of assemblages through time (Agassiz 1833–44, understanding of fishes from these deposits in the 1859) and the rates of evolutionary change (Huxley decades following Smith Woodward’s death (body 1862, 1870; Woodward 1912a: 252; summarized fossils: Patterson 1964; Casier 1966; Goody 1969; in Patterson 1981) and, more recently, provided Forey 1973, 1977; otoliths: Stinton in Casier 1966; key ancient comparators in the discovery and inter- Stinton 1975–84). However, more recent contribu- pretation of the living coelacanth Latimeria (Smith tions have been more limited in their scope, focus- 1939; Woodward 1940). The popularity of fossil- ing on specific taxa or specimens (e.g. Forey 2004). hunting in the London Clay during the mid-1800s The actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes) of the led to James Bowerbank’s foundation of the Lon- Chalk and London Clay are notable not only for don Clay Club (1836–47), which would eventually their diversity, but also for their remarkable pre- give rise to the modern Palaeontographical Society servation. Unlike most fish faunas of comparable (Elliott 1970). age, in which specimens are preserved as greatly The English Chalk and London Clay provided flattened compression fossils, these British deposits ample material for study and description by Arthur yield three-dimensionally preserved specimens of Smith Woodward, the principal subject of this either whole individuals (Chalk) or heads (London From:Johanson, Z., Barrett, P. M., Richter,M.&Smith, M. (eds) Arthur Smith Woodward: His Life and Influence on Modern Vertebrate Palaeontology. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 430, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP430.18 # 2015 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 M. FRIEDMAN ET AL. Fig. 1. Historical representations of English Chalk and London Clay fossil fish specimens: (a) the Chalk taxon Halec, from Horsfield & Mantell (1824), The History and Antiquities of Lewes and Its Vicinity, Volume 1; (b)‘Beryx Lewesiensis from the Chalk, Lewes’ from Mantell (1851), Petrifactions and their Teachings; (c, d) the Chalk taxa Homonotichthys and Osmeroides, from Dixon (1850), The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex;(e) the Chalk taxon Ctenothrissa, from Smith Woodward (1901), Catalogue of Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV;(f) ‘Head of a Pike’ from the London Clay (probably Aulopopsis), from Douglas (1785), A Dissertation on the Antiquity of the Earth;(g) the London Clay taxon Teratichthys, from Ko¨nig (1825), Icones Fossilium Sectiles;(h) the head of the London Clay taxon Albula, from Smith Woodward (1901), Catalogue of Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV. Clay). Following in Smith Woodward’s footsteps, can only be applied to some specimens from the subsequent workers have realized the significance London Clay and, in these cases, must be completed of these fossils, applying acid preparation tech- with great care. Non-destructive computed tomog- niques to extract considerable detail on the skulls raphy (CT; Sutton et al. 2014) offers an approach of fishes from the Chalk (Patterson 1964; Goody to studying the remarkable fish fossils of the Chalk 1969; Forey 1973, 2004; Forey & Patterson 2006). and London Clay without any of the drawbacks Although powerful, this approach is not without associated with traditional preparation techniques its limitations. First-generation acid preparation (Fig. 2; Beckett & Friedman 2015). We are currently yielded detailed anatomical information, but the re-studying the ray-finned fishes of the Chalk and specimens themselves were rendered very delicate London Clay using CT scanning, with the principal and difficult to examine. The loss of positional goals of better documenting their anatomy, relation- information associated with the disarticulation of ships and, through the use of biomechanical models specimens during preparation was exacerbated by developed for living fishes (e.g. Hulsey & Wain- the loss of individual bones (e.g. the jaws of Diplo- wright 2002; Collar & Wainwright 2006), ecology. mystus in Forey 2004: fig. 2). More generally, this This contribution provides context for this ongoing preparation approach is limited by the nature of research, reviewing current understanding of fishes matrix encasing fossils; although acid preparation from these two exceptional deposits. Examination is very effective with fish fossils from the Chalk, it of actinopterygians from the Chalk and London Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 1, 2021 ENGLISH CHALK AND LONDON CLAY FISHES Fig. 2. Detail of fossil fish skulls from the Chalk Group and London Clay Formation revealed by computed tomography (CT): (a–c) Argillichthys toombsi, NHMUK PV P 42519, London Clay Formation, Sheppey, Kent; (d–f)‘Sardinioides’ illustrans, NHMUK PV P 3977, Chalk Group, Burham, Kent. Models show: bones (white) visible external to matrix (brown) before segmentation of CT data (panels a and d); fossil specimen with matrix completely removed (panels b and e); and model of fossil with jaws and palate removed to reveal the branchial (green) and ventral hyoid (pink) arches. Clay has been intermittent following the major SMUC, Sedgwick Museum, University of Cam- twentieth-century monographs of Smith Woodward bridge, Cambridge, UK. (1902, 1903, 1907a, 1908, 1909, 1911, 1912a) and Casier (1966) (both of which produced major increases in the number of named fish species Geological context: Chalk Group from the British record; see Lloyd & Friedman 2013: fig. 2), meaning that important updates are High sea-levels and low continental relief limited dispersed throughout a large body of specialist liter- clastic deposition to regions deep within modern ature. Our goal is to provide an accessible summary continental interiors during the Late Cretaceous of current understanding of the Chalk and London and early Palaeogene (Mortimore et al. 2001; Mor- Clay actinopterygian faunas by reviewing a history timore 2011). Deposition in the expansive shelf of their study, basic geological context and evolu- settings of this interval was dominated by slow tionary significance. We close with a prospectus accumulation of the calcitic skeletons of plank- for future research on these deposits, which are tonic coccolithophorid algae. The resulting pelagic rightly recognized as Lagersta¨tten that represent carbonate – chalk – represents a distinctive and exceptional windows to fish diversity in the Late widespread feature of the Late Cretaceous–early Cretaceous and Eocene (Casier 1966; Patterson Palaeogene sedimentary record, with units found 1993a, b; Lloyd & Friedman 2013). across northern and central Europe, central Asia, Australia and the western interior of North America (Mortimore 2011). Institutional abbreviations The British record
Recommended publications
  • (Early Palaeocene), Withers, 1914
    Meded. Werkgr. Tert. Kwart. Geol. 25(2-3) 175-196 2 figs, 1 pi. Leiden, oktober 1988 The biostratigraphy of the Geulhem Member (Early Palaeocene), with reference to the occurrence of Pycnolepas bruennichi Withers, 1914 (Crustacea, Cirripedia) by J.W.M. Jagt Venlo, The Netherlands and J.S.H. Collins London, United Kingdom Jagt, &J.S.H. Collins. The biostratigraphy of the Geulhem reference of Member (Early Palaeocene), with to the occurrence Pyc- nolepas bruennichi Withers, 1914 (Crustacea, Cirripedia).—Meded. Werkgr. Tert. Kwart. Geol., 25(2-3): 175-196, 2 figs, 1 pi. Leiden, October 1988. Valves of the brachylepadomorph cirripede Pycnolepas bruennichi Withers, 1914 are reported from the Early Palaeocene of the environs of Maastricht (The Netherlands and NE Belgium). The occurrenceof this distinctive species provides additional proof of a correlationof the with the in Maastricht Danish Danian Early Palaeocene the area. A discussion of the biostratigraphy of the Geulhem Member (Houthem Formation) from which the cirripede remains were collected is presented. It is concluded that P. bruennichi is restricted to strata of Palaeocene in Denmark well in the Early (Danian) age as as Maastrichtian type area (SE Netherlands, NE Belgium). John W.M. Jagt, 2de Maasveldstraat 47, 5921 JN Venlo, The Netherlands; J. S.H. Collins, 63 Oakhurst Grove, East Dulwich, Lon- don SE22 9AH, United Kingdom. Contents 176 Samenvatting, p. Introduction, p. 176 177 Systematic description, p. and distribution of P. 178 Stratigraphic geographic bruennichi, p. of the Geulhem 182 Stratigraphy Member, p. Conclusion, p. 190 191 Acknowledgements, p. References, p. 191. 176 Samenvatting De de Geulhem Kalksteen voorkomen biostratigrafie van (Vroeg Paleoceen) naar aanleiding van het 1914 van Pycnolepas bruennichi Withers, (Crustacea, Cirripedia).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of London, UK
    Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 123 (2012) 22–45 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Review paper Geology of London, UK a, b,c d e c Katherine R. Royse *, Mike de Freitas , William G. Burgess , John Cosgrove , Richard C. Ghail , f g h i j k Phil Gibbard , Chris King , Ursula Lawrence , Rory N. Mortimore , Hugh Owen , Jackie Skipper a British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK b First Steps Ltd, Unit 17 Hurlingham Studios, London SW6 3PA, UK c Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK d Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK e Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK f Cambridge Quaternary, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK g 16A Park Road, Bridport, Dorset, UK h Crossrail Ltd. 25 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5LQ, UK i University of Brighton & ChalkRock Ltd, 32 Prince Edwards Road, Lewes BN7 1BE, UK j Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK k Geotechnical Consulting Group (GCG), 52A Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BE, UK A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: The population of London is around 7 million. The infrastructure to support this makes London one of the Received 25 February 2011 most intensively investigated areas of upper crust. However construction work in London continues to Received in revised form 5 July 2011 reveal the presence of unexpected ground conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Shrinkage and Swelling Were First Recognised by Geotechnical Specialists Following the Dry Summer of 1947
    C:\Documents and Settings\adixon\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\7NFVY2G5\08-112 revised2.doc Modelling Volume Change Potential in the London Clay L. D. Jones & R. Terrington British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham. NG12 5GG UK (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract The London Clay Formation is particularly susceptible to shrink–swell behaviour that has resulted in a long history of foundation damage due to ground movement across the outcrop. Damage has cost up to £500 million in a single year. Underlying most of the Greater London area, the London Clay Formation is of major engineering importance as it is on and within this formation that the majority of the city’s infrastructure, buildings and underground services are constructed. The Volume Change Potential of a soil is the relative change in volume to be expected with changes in soil moisture content and the subsequent shrinkage or swelling can cause major damage to structures above or below ground. Detailed statistical and spatial analyses of data across the London Clay outcrop has revealed a significant geographical trend in the volume change potential of this deposit, confirming an overall increase from west to east, but also showing subtle trends with depth. This paper describes how this analysis was carried out and shows how such assessments can yield valuable information about shrink–swell behaviour not only of the London Clay but of similar shrink– swell prone argillaceous formations elsewhere. Introduction The effects of shrinkage and swelling of clay soils, with respect to foundation and building damage, were first recognised by geotechnical specialists following the dry summer of 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the London Basin
    Geology of the London Basin - 100 Million Years in the Making on 16 November 2018 Mr Philip Laurie first showed a geological map of London produced in 1848 by Stanford – the first of its kind. The Earth is 46,000 million years old, so much had happened before the London area made an appearance. The geological history of London started a hundred million years ago. For 60% of that time it has been under ice, causing sea levels to fall. He lives near the Ravensbourne, which rises south of the North Downs, runs through them and north to the Thames, emerging at Deptford Creek. How did it, and other rivers such as the Wandle, Darent and Medway, come to flow through the North Downs? At one time it was thought that there were faults in the chalk which gave them a way through, but this has been discounted. The Weald is now low lying, but when tectonic plate movement, mainly caused by Africa colliding with Europe, raised not only the Alps but buckled strata in northern Europe, a Wealden ridge was formed. An underlying chalk stratum buckled with high ridges at the South and North Downs and a dip under the Weald, squeezing up the soft sedimentary rocks between them to form the Ridge. Fast flowing streams from the ridge soon eroded channels in the chalk on their way to the sea. The ridge has since been eroding away (reducing river flows). They are ancient rivers. London is over a layer of cretaceous chalk about 40m down, which in turn is over gault clay.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Geology and Fossils of Essex
    An Introduction to the Geology and Fossils of Essex The Foundations of Essex The rocks of Essex that were formed before the Ice Age are described as the 'solid' or 'bedrock' geology. Much of the solid geology is concealed beneath unconsolidated sediments laid down during the Ice Age. These Ice Age sediments (sand, gravel etc.) are called 'superficial' or 'drift' deposits. The Oldest Rocks The geological story of Essex starts with rocks that are between 440 and 360 million years old. Dating from the Silurian and Devonian periods these rocks consist of hard, slaty shales, mudstones and sandstones and are over 300 metres below the surface. These rocks have been encountered in boreholes at many places in Essex and they represent a time in the distant past when the first animals were leaving the sea to colonise the land. Similar rocks can be seen at the surface in the Welsh Borderland. Lying on top of these ancient rocks is the Gault, a marly clay from a muddy sea that dates from the middle of the Cretaceous period. This means that, beneath Essex, there is a gap in the geological record that represents about 250 million years and includes the Triassic, Jurassic and early Cretaceous periods. After deposition of the Gault, sand spread into this sea to form a deposit called the Upper Greensand. At this time sea levels were rising leading to widespread flooding of the continents, these are the conditions under which the next rock was formed - the Chalk. The Chalk Chalk is effectively the starting point of our geological story as it is the oldest rock exposed at the surface in our county.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Marine Actinopterygian Assemblages from the Maastrichtian–Paleogene of the Pindos Unit in Eurytania, Greece Thodoris Argyriou, Donald Davesne
    Offshore marine actinopterygian assemblages from the Maastrichtian–Paleogene of the Pindos Unit in Eurytania, Greece Thodoris Argyriou, Donald Davesne To cite this version: Thodoris Argyriou, Donald Davesne. Offshore marine actinopterygian assemblages from the Maastrichtian–Paleogene of the Pindos Unit in Eurytania, Greece. PeerJ, PeerJ, 2021, 9, pp.e10676. 10.7717/peerj.10676. hal-03121049 HAL Id: hal-03121049 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03121049 Submitted on 26 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Offshore marine actinopterygian assemblages from the Maastrichtian–Paleogene of the Pindos Unit in Eurytania, Greece Thodoris Argyriou1 and Donald Davesne2,3 1 UMR 7207 (MNHN—Sorbonne Université—CNRS) Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie, Museum National d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 3 UMR 7205 (MNHN—Sorbonne Université—CNRS—EPHE), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, Museum National d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France ABSTRACT The fossil record of marine ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) from the time interval surrounding the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) extinction is scarce at a global scale, hampering our understanding of the impact, patterns and processes of extinction and recovery in the marine realm, and its role in the evolution of modern marine ichthyofaunas.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Diversified Late Cretaceous Fish Assemblage Revealed by Otoliths (Ripley Formation and Owl Creek Formation, Northeast Mississippi, Usa)
    Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 126(1): 111-155. March 2020 HIGHLY DIVERSIFIED LATE CRETACEOUS FISH ASSEMBLAGE REVEALED BY OTOLITHS (RIPLEY FORMATION AND OWL CREEK FORMATION, NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI, USA) GARY L. STRINGER1, WERNER SCHWARZHANS*2 , GEORGE PHILLIPS3 & ROGER LAMBERT4 1Museum of Natural History, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana 71209, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Mississippi Museum of Natural Science, 2148 Riverside Drive, Jackson, Mississippi 39202, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4North Mississippi Gem and Mineral Society, 1817 CR 700, Corinth, Mississippi, 38834, USA. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author To cite this article: Stringer G.L., Schwarzhans W., Phillips G. & Lambert R. (2020) - Highly diversified Late Cretaceous fish assemblage revealed by otoliths (Ripley Formation and Owl Creek Formation, Northeast Mississippi, USA). Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 126(1): 111-155. Keywords: Beryciformes; Holocentriformes; Aulopiformes; otolith; evolutionary implications; paleoecology. Abstract. Bulk sampling and extensive, systematic surface collecting of the Coon Creek Member of the Ripley Formation (early Maastrichtian) at the Blue Springs locality and primarily bulk sampling of the Owl Creek Formation (late Maastrichtian) at the Owl Creek type locality, both in northeast Mississippi, USA, have produced the largest and most highly diversified actinopterygian otolith (ear stone) assemblage described from the Mesozoic of North America. The 3,802 otoliths represent 30 taxa of bony fishes representing at least 22 families. In addition, there were two different morphological types of lapilli, which were not identifiable to species level.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambush Predator’ Guild – Are There Developmental Rules Underlying Body Shape Evolution in Ray-Finned Fishes? Erin E Maxwell1* and Laura AB Wilson2
    Maxwell and Wilson BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:265 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/265 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Regionalization of the axial skeleton in the ‘ambush predator’ guild – are there developmental rules underlying body shape evolution in ray-finned fishes? Erin E Maxwell1* and Laura AB Wilson2 Abstract Background: A long, slender body plan characterized by an elongate antorbital region and posterior displacement of the unpaired fins has evolved multiple times within ray-finned fishes, and is associated with ambush predation. The axial skeleton of ray-finned fishes is divided into abdominal and caudal regions, considered to be evolutionary modules. In this study, we test whether the convergent evolution of the ambush predator body plan is associated with predictable, regional changes in the axial skeleton, specifically whether the abdominal region is preferentially lengthened relative to the caudal region through the addition of vertebrae. We test this hypothesis in seven clades showing convergent evolution of this body plan, examining abdominal and caudal vertebral counts in over 300 living and fossil species. In four of these clades, we also examined the relationship between the fineness ratio and vertebral regionalization using phylogenetic independent contrasts. Results: We report that in five of the clades surveyed, Lepisosteidae, Esocidae, Belonidae, Sphyraenidae and Fistulariidae, vertebrae are added preferentially to the abdominal region. In Lepisosteidae, Esocidae, and Belonidae, increasing abdominal vertebral count was also significantly related to increasing fineness ratio, a measure of elongation. Two clades did not preferentially add abdominal vertebrae: Saurichthyidae and Aulostomidae. Both of these groups show the development of a novel caudal region anterior to the insertion of the anal fin, morphologically differentiated from more posterior caudal vertebrae.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Systematic Biology of Fossil and Living Bony-Tongue Fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei)
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 16(3): e180031, 2018 Journal homepage: www.scielo.br/ni DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20180031 Published online: 11 October 2018 (ISSN 1982-0224) Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Printed: 30 September 2018 (ISSN 1679-6225) Review article A review of the systematic biology of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei) Eric J. Hilton1 and Sébastien Lavoué2,3 The bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha, have been the focus of a great deal of morphological, systematic, and evolutio- nary study, due in part to their basal position among extant teleostean fishes. This group includes the mooneyes (Hiodontidae), knifefishes (Notopteridae), the abu (Gymnarchidae), elephantfishes (Mormyridae), arawanas and pirarucu (Osteoglossidae), and the African butterfly fish (Pantodontidae). This morphologically heterogeneous group also has a long and diverse fossil record, including taxa from all continents and both freshwater and marine deposits. The phylogenetic relationships among most extant osteoglossomorph families are widely agreed upon. However, there is still much to discover about the systematic biology of these fishes, particularly with regard to the phylogenetic affinities of several fossil taxa, within Mormyridae, and the position of Pantodon. In this paper we review the state of knowledge for osteoglossomorph fishes. We first provide an overview of the diversity of Osteoglossomorpha, and then discuss studies of the phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha from both morphological and molecular perspectives, as well as biogeographic analyses of the group. Finally, we offer our perspectives on future needs for research on the systematic biology of Osteoglossomorpha. Keywords: Biogeography, Osteoglossidae, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Taxonomy. Os peixes da Superordem Osteoglossomorpha têm sido foco de inúmeros estudos sobre a morfologia, sistemática e evo- lução, particularmente devido à sua posição basal dentre os peixes teleósteos.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Thames Basin Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 111: Northern Thames Basin Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 111: Northern Thames Basin Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper1, Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention3, we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) 2 knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeogene Diatomite Deposits in Denmark: Geological Investigations and Applied Aspects
    Palaeogene diatomite deposits in Denmark: geological investigations and applied aspects Stig A. Schack Pedersen The Danish term ‘moler’ is the name for a special and unique N 9°E marine deposit of Lower Eocene age found in the northern part of Denmark and the Danish North Sea. In the literature 57°N 57°N Denmark it is often referred to as mo-clay, the English translation of Thisted Feggeklit ‘moler’ – a whitish, powdery sediment that lithologically is a Thy Skarrehage Ejerslev clayey diatomite. The deposit, which is defined as the Fur Siltstrup Hanklit Formation, is also well known for its 180 volcanic ash beds, Limfjorden increasing in number towards the top of the formation Stærhøj (Pedersen & Surlyk 1983). Due to Pleistocene glaciotectonic Fur Knudeklint Fur deformations the diatomite deposits crop out at the surface in Nykøbing Junget the Limfjorden area (Gry 1940; Klint & Pedersen 1995; Ertebølle Pedersen 1996, 2000). Prior to the deformations the Fur Mors Formation was situated at about 50–100 m below sea level, Salling but during the deformations the diatomite was displaced 9°E 10 km upwards into glaciotectonic complexes. The complexes form elongate parallel hills up to 80 m a.s.l. in the western Lim - Fig. 1. Map of the western Limfjorden region with place names. Note the fjord region (Fig. 1). hilly landscapes on the islands of Mors and Fur. The clayey diatomite attracts attention because it is a valu- able raw material for production of insulation bricks and absorbing granulates, which are mainly used as cat litter. In Sedimentology of the Fur Formation addition, the exposed Fur Formation is a unique reference for The Fur Formation is c.
    [Show full text]