DOCSLIB.ORG

Landscape Institute Entry Standards and Competency Framework – Additional Landscape Competencies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landscape Institute Entry Standards and Competency Framework – Additional Landscape Competencies Landscape InstituteI DECEMBER 2020 Landscape Institute entry standards and competency framework – Additional landscape competencies BACKGROUNDLandscape Institute PAPER entry standards competency framework – Additional landscape competencies December 2020 1 Chartered Member – Competency Requirements Additional Landscape Competencies Level A Expert Members will be required to meet a selection of these competencies based on their knowledge and experience Level B Accomplished Level C Able Level D Understanding All applicants All applicants for chartered membership must achieve Arboriculture all Core Landscape Competencies and five Additional and Landscape Competencies (16 competencies in total) woodland to the following levels: 9 competencies to Level B (this must include Contract administration Sustainability, Climate and Resilience) and; 7 competencies to Level C Contract management Choices must: Be no more than 1 from: Design Design – garden – landscape • Contract administration (must be taken to level B by (all sectors) anyone wishing to work as a Contract Administrator) • Contract management Design Digital And no more than 2 from: – public realm technologies • Design – garden • Design – landscape Education and Funding • Design – public realm knowledge exchange and finance Habitats and Heritage Chartered Landscape Architect Pathway species landscapes/places Subject to the requirements for all applicants those wishing to use the title Chartered Landscape Architect must Landscape Landscape construction assessment (materials and systems) include in their choices: A minimum of 1 at Level B from: Landscape Landscape Landscape planning • Design – garden ecology engineering and/or policy • Design – landscape • Design – public realm Landscapes/places and Management of Master people (including tourism) landscapes Planning A minimum of 2 (at Level B or C ) from: Natural resources and Parks Place • Contract administration or Contract management ecosystems services management management • Landscape assessment • Landscape construction (materials and systems) Planting and Procurement and Protected • Landscape planning and/or policy horticulture tendering landscapes/places • Master planning • Planting and horticulture Soil management, Visualisation and Water • Procurement and tendering conservation and improvement photography management • Visualisation and photography • Water management Common across all landscape sectors, these competencies define the unique nature of our profession. All future members will be required to meet them at some level. Creative problem Healthy Inclusive Landscapes solving places environments as systems Core Landscape competencies Other Landscape Physical and social Planning, legal, specialisms context of sites/ policy and regulatory and industry structure places/landscapes compliance Quality of Research Stakeholder and/or Sustainability, Climate landscape and analysis community engagement and Resilience These competencies are common across all professional sectors. Professional competencies Communication, negotiation, Data Digital Economic systems influencing and engagement management practice and context Members need to achieve all competencies at levels indicated: Equality and Governance of societies Health and Management of organisations diversity (legal and political) safety and services Level B Level C People management Professional judgement, Project Team working and Level D and leadership ethics and values management collaboration 2 Technician – Competency Requirements Additional Landscape Competencies Members will be required to meet a selection of these competencies Level A Expert based on their knowledge and experience Level B Accomplished Level C Able Level D Understanding All applicants All applicants for Technician Membership must achieve all the Core Landscape Competencies and either one or Arboriculture two Additional Landscape Competencies to the following and woodland levels: 7 to Level D Contract AND EITHER: administration 5 to Level C (which must include Sustainability, Climate and Resilience) Contract OR: management 1 to Level B and 3 to Level C (one of the Level C choices must be Sustainability, Climate and Resilience) Design Design – garden – landscape Choices must: (all sectors) Be no more than 1 from: • Contract administration (must be taken to level B Design Digital by anyone wishing to work as a Contract Administrator) – public realm technologies • Contract management Education and Funding And no more than 1 from: knowledge exchange and finance • Design – garden • Design – landscape Habitats and Heritage • Design – public realm species landscapes/places Landscape Landscape construction assessment (materials and systems) Landscape Landscape Landscape planning ecology engineering and/or policy Landscapes/places and Management of Master people (including tourism) landscapes Planning Natural resources and Parks Place ecosystems services management management Planting and Procurement and Protected horticulture tendering landscapes/places Soil management, Visualisation and Water conservation and improvement photography management Common across all landscape sectors, these competencies define the unique nature of our profession. All future members will be required to meet them at some level. Creative problem Healthy Inclusive Landscapes solving places environments as systems Core Landscape Other Landscape Physical and social Planning, legal, competencies specialisms context of sites/ policy and regulatory and industry structure places/landscapes compliance Quality of Research Stakeholder and/or Sustainability, Climate landscape and analysis community engagement and Resilience These competencies are common across all professional sectors. Professional competencies Communication, negotiation, Data Digital Economic systems influencing and engagement management practice and context Members need to achieve all competencies at levels indicated: Equality and Governance of societies Health and Professional judgement, diversity (legal and political) safety ethics and values Level D Project Team working and Level C management collaboration Plus one from the list to Level C 3 Additional Landscape Competencies (in alphabetical order) Level A – Level B – Level C – Level D – Competency Description Understanding Able Accomplished Expert Arboriculture Recognises the importance Understands the underlying Can work within a team Has a proven track Is an authority on the and woodland of trees and woodland principles, legislation and and contribute to the record of delivering integration of landscape as part of both urban best practice of tree and delivery of projects relevant projects. Can level thinking in tree and and rural landscapes woodland management. requiring tree and provide leadership and woodland management. including their ecological, Recognises the social and woodland management. supervision in the delivery Promotes and educates economic, socio-cultural environmental benefits Independently make of complex schemes on the functions, benefits and aesthetic roles. of trees and factors decisions on basic working alongside other and integration of trees Considers the principles which influence their planning and management professionals. Evaluates and woodland within the of silviculture, including management. to consider common and offers critical and urban and rural landscape. species selection according influencing factors strategic thinking in Provides strategic level to site conditions, artificial situations with unique and advice to national bodies. and natural regeneration uncommon factors. of woodlands and interventions. Creates management plans. To be competent you will Demonstrate Can: Can: Are called upon to: need to demonstrate understanding of: • Work with assistance • Demonstrate a track • Contribute to new that in relation to your • The significance of as part of a project team record of successful and research and thinking landscape specialism you: legislation regarding the including specialists to relevant projects on management of trees protection of trees and determine appropriate • Lead and supervise a and woodland woodland management of existing project team engaged • Advise on the • Key principles of policy trees and woodland in the planning and formulation of standards, and best practice for • Make decisions on management of existing policy and/or best trees and woodland in species selection for a trees and woodland practice at a national the planning process range of basic sites and • Formulate complex and/or international level • The varying functions climates planting schemes • Provide training and and services that trees • Effectively plan projects which balance a range guidance to others on the and woodland offer involving trees and of objectives and appropriate management within a range of settings woodland with regard to constraints and planting of trees and and contexts relevant legislation and • Oversee and ensure woodland • A range of common processes compliance with required • Use the position of an tree species and • Seek and appoint legislation, standards expert to promote the characteristics specialist consultants and best practice benefits of trees and • The importance of when appropriate, • Communicate and woodland to society and correct species choice including sourcing and demonstrate an the environment and planting specification evaluating proposals understanding of • Provide expert advice for trees and woodland • Specify appropriate complex tree and on the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape Engineering, Protecting Soil, and Runoff Storm Water
    Chapter 27 Landscape Engineering, Protecting Soil, and Runoff Storm Water Mehmet Cetin Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55812 1. Introduction Landscape engineering thinks about the application of mathematics and science to the creation of convenient outdoor living areas. These outdoor living areas are a consequence of the design and the construction process made feasible by landscape architects through landscape contractors. Beside landscape engineer’s interested in containing site grading and drainage, earthwork calculations, and watersheds [1,12,13]. Landscape engineers employ engineering knowledge when designing and building spaces. They demand to know how to interpret contour maps which shows elevations and surface configuration by means of contour line sand and also consider how to interpret 2-D images, compute angles and grading requirements for pavements, parking lots, bridges, roads and other structures. Beside they understand the amount of fill needed for specific areas and figure out how water runoff and flow should affect their designs. Developing and improving for landscape engineering [1,3,13,14] 1. Stormwater management: building up bioswales, landscape materials used to gather and install runoff, rain gardens and porous asphalt. 2. Mitigation of the urban heat island effect: diminishing the quantity of paved surfaces, building up green roofs and green walls, and using building materials with low reflectivity. 3. Wildlife habitat: protecting habitat and building up green roofs and rain gardens. 4. Social spaces: areas for walking, biking, gathering and eating. 5. Transportation: growth expanding pedestrian accessibility, limiting vehicle speeds and encouraging the use of public transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Design
    ECOLOGY and DESIGN Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education 2006 Report and Proposal The AIA Committee on the Environment Cover photos (clockwise) Cornell University's entry in the 2005 Solar Decathlon included an edible garden. This team earned second place overall in the competition. Photo by Stefano Paltera/Solar Decathlon Students collaborating in John Quale's ecoMOD course (University of Virginia), which received special recognition in this report (see page 61). Photo by ecoMOD Students in Jim Wasley's Green Design Studio and Professional Practice Seminar (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) prepare to present to their client; this course was one of the three Ecological Literacy in Architecture Education grant recipients (see page 50). Photo by Jim Wasley ECOLOGY and DESIGN Ecological by Kira Gould, Assoc. AIA Literacy in Lance Hosey, AIA, LEED AP Architecture with contributions by Kathleen Bakewell, LEED AP Education Kate Bojsza, Assoc. AIA 2006 Report Peter Hind , Assoc. AIA Greg Mella, AIA, LEED AP and Proposal Matthew Wolf for the Tides Foundation Kendeda Sustainability Fund The contents of this report represent the views and opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the American Institute of Architects (AIA). The AIA supports the research efforts of the AIA’s Committee on the Environment (COTE) and understands that the contents of this report may reflect the views of the leadership of AIA COTE, but the views are not necessarily those of the staff and/or managers of the Institute. The AIA Committee
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Solutions in Hydraulic Engineering
    ACE Solutions in Hydraulic Engineering 2020 2018/10 www.geoace.com About ACE Geosynthetics Index • Professional Services • ACE Solutions in Hydraulic Engineering • ACE Solutions 1. Beach Nourishment 2. Groynes and Jetties 3. Sediment Dredging 4. Seawalls and Bulkheads 5. Levees and Dikes 6. Pier Scour Protection 7. Revetments Founded in March 1996, ACE Geosynthetics is now a leader in high-performance products, including geogrids, geotextiles, 8. Flood Detention Taiwan's geosynthetics industry and offers professional and geotextile tubes, vegetative nets, drainage materials, and innovative solutions for the global engineering market, landscaping and hydraulic materials. In addition to the ISO9001 including collapse site remediation, slope and retaining wall quality management system certification, the TAF (Taiwan • ACE Products engineering, weak foundation improvements, slope erosion Accreditation Foundation) certified laboratory has been further control, road engineering, environmental protection, maritime established to strictly control product quality. At the same time, it • Why Choose ACE Geosynthetics? engineering, riverbank protection, etc. In the past ten years, has actively obtained product certification from various countries our outstanding design and application performance of and is currently one of the manufacturers with the most complete • ACE Geosynthetics EcoPark geosynthetic materials have been repeatedly recognized by set of global product certification systems. Meanwhile, in 2003, a International Achievement Awards from Industrial Fabrics professional engineering design team has been established to Association International, and the number of obtained awards provide engineering planning and design integration and is among the best among global competitors. Currently, the application services. We continue to strengthen our vertical countries to which the Company exports its products and integration capabilities from product development, manufacturing, services span more than 70 countries across five continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Mining Land-Use Planning and Design
    Post-mining Land-nse Planning and Design: a Multiplicity of Choices and Options by Jon Bryan Burley Abstract. Surface mine reclamation planning and design is a topic of interest to landowners, reclamation specialists, citizen groups, and regulatory agencies. Over the past eleven years an international group of 30 land-use planning and design reclamation specialists developed a 50 I page camera-ready manuscript concerning post-mining land-use planning and design. This collaborative group notes that efficient and effective post-mining land-use planning and design requires an understanding of the possible configurations affiliated with the landscape, training in the fundamentals of planning and design, and skill in the technological tools of planning and design. Post-mining land-use planning and design usually demands that the reclamation specialist be proficient in detail design, site design, site planning, landscape planning, and design development. In addition, the reclamation specialist who works upon a post-mining land-use plan should be familiar with mining, mineral processing, mining operations, land-use zoning, local ordinances, and site development regulations. Finally, reclamation specialists should be well acquainted with the characteristics and requirements of each general land-use type and be capable in orchestrating these land-use types in a multiple land-use setting. Additional Key Words: landscape architecture, urban planning, design process, design programming, resource development, mine engineering Introduction addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • The George Wright Forum
    The World Heritage Convention and the National Park Service BM'^^CTatafiafisga The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 30 number 1 • 2013 Origins Founded in 1980, die George Wright Society is organized for the purposes of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communication, im­ proving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicated to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natural parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides ave­ nues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to be the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural re­ source management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors Brent A. Mitchell, President • Newbury, Massachusetts John Waithaka, Vice President • Nepean, Ontario David J. Parsons, Secretary • Florence, Montana Gary E. Davis, Treasurer • Thousand Oaks, California Nathalie Gagnon • Ottawa, Ontario Barrett Kennedy • Baton Rouge, Louisiana Jerry M. Mitchell • Littleton, Colorado FrankJ. Priznar • Laytonsville, Maryland Ryan Sharp • Richmond, Kentucky Jan W. van Wagtendonk • El Portal, California Lynn Wilson • Cobble Hill, British Columbia Graduate Student Liaison to the Board CarenaJ. van Riper • College Station, Texas Executive Office David Harmon, Executive Director / Co-editor, The George Wright Forum Emily Dekker-Fiala, Conference Coordinator Rebecca Conard, Co-editor, The George Wright Forum P.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Architecture (LARC) 1
    Landscape Architecture (LARC) 1 Landscape Architecture (LARC) Courses LARC 0841. Sustainable Design. 3 Credit Hours. What's the big deal about global warming and how should we respond to it? Explore the issues and underlying causes. See how contemporary designers from Germany, Netherlands, UK and Japan are responding to scientific knowledge with sustainable designs for buildings, cars, towns and parks. Develop your own creative project to reduce the greenhouse effect. Have you ever wondered about what happens to local abandoned factories and degraded streams and rivers? Philadelphia is a national hotbed for sustainable design. Visit local restoration sites, modern "green" buildings, parks that reclaim waste water and transformed industrial parks to see firsthand what is happening in our area. Learn how design is transforming to propel us toward a low waste, energy conserving society in the 21st century. NOTE: This course fulfills a Science & Technology (GS) requirement for students under GenEd and Science & Technology Second Level (SB) for students under Core. This course should not be taken by students who have successfully completed LARC 1013. Course Attributes: GS Repeatability: This course may not be repeated for additional credits. LARC 0852. Green vs. Gray: Improving and Sustaining Urban Ecosystems. 3 Credit Hours. Explores urban ecosystems and methods of improving and sustaining urban environments using the City of Philadelphia as a living laboratory. Students learn about urban ecology, urban field experiments, and the work required to sustain green infrastructure within a city landscape. As a Community- Based Learning (CBL) course, students engage in ten hours of field work and environmental stewardship which can range from the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society's Tree Tender training, tree planting, restoring urban ecological systems and vacant lots, working in sustainable urban agriculture and/or greening school rooftops.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Carhart Helped to Conceptualize and Implement the Cooperative Association Idea While Employed with the Forest Service
    ARCHITECTS OF COLORADO BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Architect: Carhart, Arthur H. Birth/Death Dates: 1892-1978 Practice Dates: 1916-1962 Firms: O.C. Simonds USDA Forest Service McCrary, Culley and Carhart Biographical Information The U.S. Forest Service hired Arthur H. Carhart as its first full-time landscape architect on March 1, 1919. His appointment as a “recreation engineer” marked official agency recognition of the importance of planning and managing its recreational resources to meet public demands. Carhart’s tenure with the Forest Service set in motion the comprehensive planning, multiple- use, and wilderness planning initiatives that eventually resulted in federal regulation and law. Carhart developed the first forest-wide comprehensive recreation plan in the nation for the San Isabel National Forest in Colorado. This plan provided a thorough and practical framework and a set of solutions to address the booming outdoor recreational needs of the post World War I public in the national forests. His plan considered the impacts of the automobile on forest visitation numbers and the scenic driving and campground needs engendered by automobile tourism in the national forests. The San Isabel National Forest Recreation Plan, developed by Carhart in 1919 and 1920, encompassed a 1.5 million acre area. Over a period of twenty years, several different forest administrations implemented the plan with some minor modifications, a testament to its inherent strength. Perhaps Carhart’s unique contribution to the practice of outdoor recreational planning was his fusion of theoretical academic naturalistic concepts with “city planning and zoning” techniques to create a practical application of these theories and techniques, amplified on a large scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Viii Closure and Reclamation
    108 TOWARDS ZERO HARM – A COMPENDIUM OF PAPERS PREPARED FOR THE GLOBAL TAILINGS REVIEW TOWARDS ZERO HARM – A COMPENDIUM OF PAPERS PREPARED FOR THE GLOBAL TAILINGS REVIEW 109 MANAGEMENT OF TAILINGS: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE CHAPTER VIII CLOSURE AND RECLAMATION Gord McKenna, Geotechnical Engineer and Landform Designer, McKenna Geotechnical Inc, Adjunct Professor, University of Alberta Dirk Van Zyl*, Professor of Mining Engineering, Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE Tailings landforms are an enduring legacy of many Worldwide, many mines have one or more active or mining landscapes – the design and construction inactive tailings facilities. Each tailings facility is a of these facilities to perform well for the next mining landform that is already part of the permanent millennium is just as great a challenge and effort landscape, and which will require reclamation as as is maintaining operational dam safety. This part of mining’s commitment to be a temporary chapter provides an overview of leading practices use of the land and to enable individual mines to for design, construction, deposition, stabilisation, leave a positive mining legacy. Each of these tailings decommissioning, capping, reclamation, and aftercare landforms must be sited, designed, constructed/ for tailings facilities. It builds on the work detailed in filled, decommissioned, stabilised, reclaimed, Sustainable design and post-closure performance of and deregulated as dams, relinquished and then tailings dams (ICOLD 2013). maintained over the long-term by landowners or regulatory agencies. Where the relinquishment cannot An important advance in mine closure design is the be accomplished, ongoing maintenance will be framework of landform design — a new concept that responsibility of the mine owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Architecture
    Department of Landscape Architecture Periodic Program Review Submitted January 2011 Self Study Goal V: Engage Kentuckians and others in partnerships to elevate the quality of life. ‐‐ University of Kentucky Mission Statement Landscape Architectural Accreditation Board SELF EVALUATION REPORT 2002‐2008 Department of Landscape Architecture University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Lexington, Kentucky TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Self-Evaluation Report Information Sheet. 1 1. History of the Program...........................................3 2. Response to Previous LAAB Review................................5 3. Current Strengths. .............................................7 4. Current Weaknesses............................................8 5. Persons Who Participated in Preparing this Report. 9 1.0 Program Mission & Objectives....................................1 0 1.1 Program Mission and Objectives. 1 0 1.2 Relationship of Program to Institution.. 1 2 1.3 Progress toward Attainment.............................1 5 1.4 Plans for Improvement.................................1 5 1.5 Program Disclosure. ..................................1 6 2.0 Governance & Administration. ...................................1 7 2.1 Administrative Organization. 1 7 2.2 Administration, Teaching and Research Staff. 2 0 2.3 Policies and Procedures................................2 0 2.4 Equal Opportunity.....................................2 5 2.5 Faculty Number. .....................................2 6 2.6 Previous and Present Faculty.. 2 7 2.7 Student/Faculty Ratio..................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space, Public Health and Bodily Metaphor in the Landscape of Urban Park History
    ‘The Lungs of the City’: Green Space, Public Health and Bodily Metaphor in the Landscape of Urban Park History KAREN R. JONES School of History University of Kent Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NX, UK Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT New machinery, factory systems and a burgeoning population made the nine- teenth century the era of the city. It also represented the coming of age of the city park. Across Europe and North America, elite spaces were opened to pub- lic access and new areas dedicated as ‘parks for the people.’ This paper offers a brief tour of green spaces across three iconic metropolitan sites – London, Paris and New York – to consider how the axioms of recreation, industrial modernity and public health operated in specific urban contexts. Of particular note is the fact that park planners embraced an holistic vision, often articulated via bodily metaphors, that incorporated both social and environmental aspects: thus behind apparently nostalgic visions for a pre-industrial bucolic greenery lay irrefutably modern approaches to urban planning that presaged twenty and twenty-first century holistic experiments in garden cities and ‘living homes.’ Also central to this study is the idea of the park as a liminal space and an eminently readable landscape: an evolving site of translation, negotiation and transformatioFn that highlights the fertile ground of cross-disciplinary study and the benefits of a complex ecological history that involves close examina- tion of place, action and imagery. KEYWORDS Parks, city, public health, gardens, medicine Environment and History 24 (2018): 39–58. doi: 10.3197/096734018X15137949591837? = username OPEN ACCESS (Creative$REMOTE_ASSR Commons CC-BY = IP 4.0 address License) Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:04:50 = Date & Time 40 KAREN R.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Solutions in Geotechnical Engineering
    ACE Solutions in Geotechnical Engineering 2020 www.geoace.com About ACE Geosynthetics Index • Professional Services • ACE Solutions in Geotechnical Engineering • ACE Solutions 1. Landslide Remediation and Road Rehabilitation 2. Geosynthetic Reinforced Slope and Retaining Wall 3. Basal Reinforcement 4. Slope Erosion Control 5. Debris Control Embankment • ACE Products Founded in March 1996, ACE Geosynthetics is now a leader in performance products, including geogrids, geotextiles, geotextile • Why Choose ACE Geosynthetics? Taiwan's geosynthetics industry and offers professional and tubes, vegetative nets, drainage materials, and landscaping and innovative solutions for the global engineering market, including hydraulic materials. In addition to the ISO9001 quality collapse site remediation, slope and retaining wall engineering, management system certification, the TAF (Taiwan Accreditation • ACE Geosynthetics EcoPark weak foundation improvements, slope erosion control, road Foundation) certified laboratory has been further established to engineering, environmental protection, maritime engineering, strictly control product quality. At the same time, it has actively riverbank protection, etc. In the past ten years, the Company's obtained product certification from various countries and is outstanding design and application performance of geosynthetic currently one of the manufacturers with the most complete set of materials have been repeatedly recognized by International global product certification systems. Meanwhile, in 2003, a Achievement Awards from Industrial Fabrics Association professional engineering design team has been established to International, and the number of awards obtained by the Company provide engineering planning and design integration and is among the best among global competitors. Currently, the application services. We continue to strengthen our vertical countries to which the Company exports its products and services integration capabilities from product development, manufacturing, span more than 70 countries across five continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Bioengineering for Upland Slope Stabilization
    Research Report Research Project WA-RD 491.1 Soil Bioengineering for Slopes SOIL BIOENGINEERING FOR UPLAND SLOPE STABILIZATION by Lisa Lewis Sandra L. Salisbury Principal Investigator Landscape Designer USDA Forest Service Washington State Department of Transportation National Riparian Service Team Roadside and Site Development Unit Bureau of Land Management Office PO Box 47329 PO Box 550 Olympia, WA 98504-7329 Prineville, Oregon 97754 Shannon Hagen Research Assistant Washington State Department of Transportation Roadside and Site Development Unit PO Box 47329 Olympia, WA 98504-7329 Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 University District Building 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Mark Maurer, L.A., Roadside and Site Development Manager February 2001 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 491.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE SOIL BIOENGINEERING FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION February 2001 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Lisa Lewis, Shannon Hagen, and Sandra Salisbury 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Lisa Lewis National Riparian Service Team 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. USDA, Forest Service c/o Bureau of Land Management PO Box 550 Prineville, OR 97754 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Washington State Department of Transportation Research Report PO Box 47329 Olympia, Washington 98504-7370 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Program Manager: Jim Schafer 360-705-7971 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with WSDOT, National Riparian Service Team (USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Natural Resource Conservation Service), Washington State Department of Ecology, and the Washington Conservation Corps.
    [Show full text]