GSSHA—Large Watershed Hydrology Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GSSHA—Large Watershed Hydrology Study GSSHA—Large Watershed Hydrollogy Study Galveston Island, TX Watershed 1. Modelliing Projject Overviiew Purpose This project demonstrates how the overland boundary conditions capability in GSSHA is used to model coastal storm surges after a cyclone event. The purpose of this project was to compare GSSHA results with actual inundation depths reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the same cyclone event in Galveston Island, TX. This model can be used in future studies to show how overland boundary conditions in GSSHA accurately simulate storm surge events. Model Background The model is located in Galveston Island, Texas as shown in Figure 1. As we are not simulating overland flow, the watershed doesn’t have an outlet location where outflow will be measured; instead, it has boundary conditions. Because the northern section of the island is the most populated, this was the area used for the model, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 1: Watershed Area Figure 2: Delineated Watershed The boundary conditions were added to represent the storm surge caused by Hurricane Ike on Galveston Island in September 2008. Hurricane Ike originated from a tropical wave off the west coast of Africa. Ike made landfall across Great Inagua Island (Bahamas) as a category 4 hurricane and then into the Northeast Coast of Cuba as a category 3 hurricane. Ike crossed Cuba overnight, and emerged into the Caribbean Sea the morning of September 8 th heading to the Gulf of Mexico. By Sept 11, Ike’s tropical storm wind swath was approximately 450 miles wide with a hurricane force wind swath of 180 miles. Ike made landfall on Galveston Island at 2:10 am September 13th as a strong category 2. Ike's large wind swath, along with the fact that it piled water over the shallowest portion of the Gulf, lead to much higher than normal storm surge flooding along the Upper Texas and Louisiana Coasts. (http://www.srh.noaa.gov/lch/ike/ikemain.php ) Ike is directly responsible for 103 deaths across Hispaniola, Cuba, and parts of the United States Gulf Coast. Extensive damage from strong winds, storm surge, and rainfall occurred over Hispaniola, the Turks and Caicos Islands, the southern Bahamas, Cuba, and the U.S. Gulf Coast from Florida to Texas. Additional deaths and significant damage occurred across parts of the Ohio Valley and southeastern Canada after Ike lost tropical characteristics. The Insurance Services Office estimates that the insured damage (not including inland flooding or storm surge) from Ike in Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas is $9.7 billion dollars. The National Flood Insurance Program estimates that insured losses from inland flooding and storm surge is $489.5 million in the same three states. Using these preliminary figures, total damage is estimated at about $19.3 billion dollars. These estimates suggest that Ike is the fourth costliest hurricane to affect the United States, after Hurricanes Katrina (2005), Andrew (1992), and Wilma (2005). (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL092008_Ike.pdf ) To determine the effectiveness of GSSHA in modeling storm surges, we calibrated the model with maximum observed inundation depths on Galveston Island using Hurricane Ike storm surges. The observed depths are shown in Figure 3. This map was generated by the NOAA National Weather Service Forecast Office. Figure 3: Inundation Depths in Galveston County. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/hgx/projects/ike08/inundation.htm Data Acquisition and Model Setup We downloaded several datasets to create a GSSHA model of this watershed. The following data were required to develop the model, most of which were obtained using the web service tools in WMS: 1. Land use data: This data was obtained from webgis.com and this particular dataset was placed on the WMS Web Service Catalog site so it could be downloaded from any copy of WMS 8.2 or later. Figure 4 shows Land Use polygons for Galveston Watershed which were used to create land use and combined index maps for determining properties such as overland Manning’s roughness in the watershed. INDUSTRIAL CROPLAND AND PASTURE STREAMS AND CANALS COMMERCIAL AND NON FORESTED WETLAND SERVICES RESIDENTIAL TRANSPORTATION LAKE Figure 4: Land Use Map for Galveston Island Watershed 2. Soil type and texture data: detailed county soil survey geographic (SSURGO) data was obtained from the NRCS. The soil texture for each polygon was obtained from the soil polygons in the SSURGO database. This texture is normally used to determine GSSHA soil infiltration parameters. Even though we gathered this data, for this model we did not use Soil type Data to create index maps because in this specific scenario of extreme flood simulation in GSSHA, the infiltration is minimal. 3. Elevation data: 10-meter resolution elevation data was available in this area from the USGS seamless elevation dataset. This data was downloaded directly from WMS. These elevations were used to determine the model extent and to create 2D grid cell elevations in the GSSHA hydrologic model. Figure 5 shows the watershed elevations symbolized by different colors, with red representing the elevation closest to sea level. Figure 5: Watershed Elevations 4. Topographic and aerial photography data: Digital raster graphic (DRG) topographic maps were obtained from the Microsoft terraserver web service client in WMS. Digital orthophoto quads (DOQ) aerial photographs were also obtained from this same service. The purpose of these maps was to identify outlet locations and other key features within the watershed (Figure 6). Figure 6: View of delineated watershed over topographic map of Galveston Island 5. Precipitation data: Because we are not simulating the effect of rainfall alone on the watershed and because precipitation is minimal compared to the storm surge caused by Hurricane Ike, a uniform intensity of 10.5 mm/hr was entered for a total of 24 hours of rain. This data was obtained form NOAA National Weather Service Forecast Office, which reported it as a Rainfall Contour Map developed for Harris County, as shown in Figure 7. Galveston Island is located South East of Harris County and these rainfall values were used as a reference for Galveston Island. Figure 7: 48-Hour Rainfall for Sept. 12-14, 2008 measured by the Harris County Flood Control District, TX http://www.srh.noaa.gov/hgx/projects/ike08/HurricaneIkeRainfall.html 6. Storm Surge Data: Historical storm surge data for the state of Texas was retrieved from the NOAA Tides and Currents website: http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/station_retrieve.shtml?type=Historic+Tide+Data . Figure 8 shows the observation stations along the coast of Texas. We gathered data from two tide gauges, namely: Galveston Pier 21 (29° 18.6' N, 94° 47.6' W) and Galveston Pleasure Pier (29° 17.1' N, 94° 47.3' W) located within the island and shown inside red boxes in Figure 8. In the selection of the tide gauges we had to take into account that some of them, mostly the ones located within our watershed or within Hurricane Ike radius, failed due to strong winds. In addition, some of the gauges did not have data available from Sept 12 to Sept 15, 2008. Figure 8: Meteorological Stations along the coast of Texas. http://tidesonline.nos.noaa.gov/geographic.html Figure 9 and Figure 10 show storm surge plots for the two different tide gauges. Note in Figure 9 that peak storm surge values are missing due to gauge failure. These values were estimated using Galveston Pleasure Pier gauge as a reference. Figure 9: Storm Surge Data for Galveston Pier 21 Station Figure 10: Storm Surge Data for Galveston Pleasure Pier Station After obtaining all the data described above, we developed the model using the WMS hydrologic modeling wizard. First, the basin was delineated with an outlet located between Galveston Sewage Disposal Plant and Pier 41 in the west shore of the island as shown in Figure 11. This was just a preliminary delineation to be used to delineate a greater area of the island. With the create arc tool we extended the watershed boundaries to the extent where we needed it, as shown in Figure 12. We did not define stream parameters, redistribute the vertices on the streams or smooth streams in the watershed because the model did not require a stream outlet hydrograph. Figure 11: Preliminary Delineated Watershed We created a 60 by 60 meter 2D grid that conformed to the DEM elevations. After the grid was created, we defined the simulation time and the time step, as well as the Land Use index map shown in Figure 13, entered mapping table parameters, and processed the precipitation data described above. Figure 12: Final Watershed Extent Figure 13: Land Use Index Map 7. Boundary Conditions Setup: We set two boundary conditions in the model, one representing storm surge caused by Hurricane Ike on the gulf side of the island and one boundary condition for the bay side of the island. The boundary condition on the gulf was entered from the cell south of Greens Bayou with the following coordinates: 29 °15’55.29” N and 94°49’46.58” W. The boundary conditions extend to the farthest point east in the jetties with coordinates: 29 °14’48.82” N and 94°42’58.92” W as shown in Figure 14. The boundary conditions were set to variable depth and the storm surge time series from Galveston Pleasure Pier gauge (Station ID 8771510) were used. This storm surge data can be found at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/station_retrieve.shtml?type=Historic+Tide+Data Boundary conditions on the bay side of Galveston Island started from the end point of the gulf side boundary condition (in the jetties) with coordinates 29 °14’48.82” N and 94°42’58.92” to the Seawall south with coordinates: 29 °17’23.52” N and 94°52’11.98” W as shown in Figure 14.
Recommended publications
  • Caribou/Poker Creek Research Watershed
    Conceptualizing Peatlands in a Physically-Based Spatially Distributed Hydrologic Model Charles W. Downer and Mark D. Wahl Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center HS10.8 A.370. European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2017,Vienna, Austria Moss/Peat as Vegetative Abstract Soils at Caribou/Poker Creeks Research Watershed Land Cover at Caribou/Poker Creeks Research Watershed Roughness 0.18 Vegetation Conceptualization 0.16 As part of a research effort focused on climate change effects on permafrost near • Increased the overland roughness Fairbanks, Alaska, it becam e apparent t hat peat soils, overlain by thick sphagnum values of the peat and sphagnum 0.14 m oss, had a considerable effect on the overall hydrology. Peat lands represent a well beyond the range associat ed 0.12 with the forested landuse. 0.10 confounding mixture of vegetation, soils, and w at er t hat present challenges for Data • Failed to m at ch the timing of the conceptualizing and parametrizing hydrologic models. We employed the Gridded 0.08 peak and overall shape of the Su r f ac e Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis Model (GSSHA) in our analysis of the 0.06 observed hydrograph. Caribou Poker Creek Experimental Watershed (CPCRW). Th e model enables 0.04 simulation of surface w at er and groundwater interactions, as well as soil • Over lan d flow equations with 0.02 temperature and frozen ground effects on subsurface w at er movement. A sit e increased roughness poorly represent the lat eral fluxes 0 visit exposed the presence of surface w at er flows indicating a mixed basin t hat 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Time would require both surface and subsurface simulation capability to properly through the peat .
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Watershed and Water Quality Tools for Nutrient Fate and Transport
    EPA 600/R-19/232 | December 2019 | www.epa.gov/research A Review of Watershed and Water Quality Tools for Nutrient Fate and Transport Office of Research and Development Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response | Groundwater Characterization & Remediation Division EPA 600/R-19/232 December 2019 A Review of Watershed and Water Quality Tools for Nutrient Fate and Transport Tadesse Sinshaw National Research Council Resident Research Associate United States Environmental Protection Agency Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Center 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK 74820, USA Lifeng Yuan National Research Council Resident Research Associate United States Environmental Protection Agency Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Center 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK 74820, USA Kenneth J. Forshay Project Officer United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response Groundwater Characterization and Remediation Division 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK 74820, USA Office of Research and Development Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response | Groundwater Characterization & Remediation Division Disclaimer This document has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. This technical report presents the result of work directed by Project Officer Kenneth J. Forshay (EPA). The research described in this report has been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency including support for National Research Council Research Associateship Program Fellows Tadesse Sinshaw and Lifeng Yuan. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Quality Assurance This work was performed under an EPA-approved quality assurance project plan, “A Review of Tools for Nutrient Fate and Transport Simulation,” (QA ID #: G-GWERD- 0031787-QP-1-1), approved September 24, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • A Distributed Watershed Hydrologic, Sediment, Nutrient Transport and Fate Model Zhonglong Zhang BTS, U.S
    Engineering Conferences International ECI Digital Archives Fifty Years Of Watershed Modeling - Past, Present Proceedings And Future 2012 A Distributed Watershed Hydrologic, Sediment, Nutrient Transport and Fate Model Zhonglong Zhang BTS, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, USA Billy E. Johnson U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, USA Charles W. Downer U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, USA Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.engconfintl.org/watershed Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Zhonglong Zhang, Billy E. Johnson, and Charles W. Downer, "A Distributed Watershed Hydrologic, Sediment, Nutrient Transport and Fate Model" in "Fifty Years Of Watershed Modeling - Past, Present And Future", A.S. Donigian, AQUA TERRA onC sultants; Richard Field, US EPA (retired); Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2013). http://dc.engconfintl.org/watershed/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Proceedings at ECI Digital Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fifty Years Of Watershed Modeling - Past, Present And Future by an authorized administrator of ECI Digital Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Distributed Watershed Hydrologic, Sediment, Nutrient Transport and Fate Model Zhonglong Zhanga, Billy E. Johnsonb and Charles W. Downer b a. BTS, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180 (Email: [email protected]) b. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180 (Email: [email protected], [email protected]) 1 Overview 2 Hydrologic Simulation 5 Coupling Hydrology, Sediment and Nutrient Simulation Modules A distributed watershed hydrologic, sediment, nutrient transport and fate model - GSSHA Mass Transport was developed at U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration of GSSHA Hydrology at Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed by Charles W
    ERDC TN-SWWRP-08-x March 2008 Demonstration of GSSHA Hydrology at Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed By Charles W. Downer PURPOSE: The purpose of this System-Wide Water Resources (SWWRP) technical note is to describe the application of the Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) model at the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW). The purpose of applying the model at this site was to confirm that the hydrologic portions of the code were working properly and were able to achieve accurate results. Application of GSSHA at this site also allows the current model to be compared and contrasted with the performance of previous versions of the model. BACKGROUND: GSSHA is a physics-based, distributed-parameter, hydrology and transport code. As part of SWWRP, the GSSHA model has undergone a series of major improvements and additions including changes to the stream hydraulics, soil moisture accounting, and sediment transport portions of the model. While these additions and improvements enhance the model’s ability to perform additional analysis, it is essential that the new methods and enhanced model be tested to assure that the model is functioning as desired and that the model can reproduce historic results at an equal or superior level to previous versions of GSSHA. The GCEW, a small (21.2-km2) agricultural watershed located in northeast Mississippi, has been the test bed for many features of the GSSHA model. The watershed is instrumented to measure rainfall, hydrometeorological variables, soil moisture, and stream water and sediment discharge (Figure 1). Legend Streamflow gage with rain gage 6 SCAN Station 9 12 5 8 11 Rain gage 3 10 2 4 7 13 14 Scale (m) 1 1000 0 5001000 N Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Transport Modelling in Shallow Waters: a Review on Approaches, Models and Applications
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Erosion and Sediment Transport Modelling in Shallow Waters: A Review on Approaches, Models and Applications Mohammad Hajigholizadeh 1,* ID , Assefa M. Melesse 2 ID and Hector R. Fuentes 3 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 W Flagler Street, EC3781, Miami, FL 33174, USA 2 Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, AHC-5-390, 11200 SW 8th Street Miami, FL 33199, USA; melessea@fiu.edu 3 Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 W Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174, USA; fuentes@fiu.edu * Correspondence: mhaji002@fiu.edu; Tel.: +1-305-905-3409 Received: 16 January 2018; Accepted: 10 March 2018; Published: 14 March 2018 Abstract: The erosion and sediment transport processes in shallow waters, which are discussed in this paper, begin when water droplets hit the soil surface. The transport mechanism caused by the consequent rainfall-runoff process determines the amount of generated sediment that can be transferred downslope. Many significant studies and models are performed to investigate these processes, which differ in terms of their effecting factors, approaches, inputs and outputs, model structure and the manner that these processes represent. This paper attempts to review the related literature concerning sediment transport modelling in shallow waters. A classification based on the representational processes of the soil erosion and sediment transport models (empirical, conceptual, physical and hybrid) is adopted, and the commonly-used models and their characteristics are listed. This review is expected to be of interest to researchers and soil and water conservation managers who are working on erosion and sediment transport phenomena in shallow waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Watershed Modeling with GSSHA June 20-23 National Water Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    Workshop on Watershed Modeling with GSSHA June 20-23 National Water Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama You will learn the basics of: • Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) model, developed at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research and Development Center and the University of Wyoming • Dept. of Defense Watershed Modeling System (WMS), developed by Aquaveo LLC • Spatial data needed to estimate distributed GSSHA model parameters, including data requirements, basics of GSSHA/WMS and how to find and use spatial geographic data to develop GSSHA models using the WMS Hydrologic Model Wizard. The GSSHA model with WMS support constitutes a complete watershed analysis system that can be used for a variety of hydrologic science and engineering computation and design evaluation, such as flood simulation, hydrologic impacts of land use change, best management practice design, and testing of flood mitigation measures. Course Layout: Through a combination of lectures and experiential applications, the course features the spatially distributed modeling components of this system. The course begins with an overview of the capabilities of the WMS to ensure maximum benefit from the hands-on portions of the class. Attendees will learn to use WMS to set up GSSHA models that include overland flow, infiltration, distributed rainfall, hydraulic structures, continuous simulations, flood inundation mapping, and groundwater/surface water interaction. Outcome: Having completed this course, attendees will gain a working knowledge of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) GSSHA model that is supported by the Watershed Modeling System (WMS) graphical user interface software. Attendees will also understand how, when, and why to apply the tools to specific studies as well as understand input data requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • ERDC TN-SWWRP-10-3, Improved Soil Erosion and Sediment
    ERDC TN-SWWRP-10-3 August 2010 Improved Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport in GS SHA by Charles W. Downer, Fred L. Ogden, Nawa Pradhan, Siqing Liu, and Aaron R. Byrd PURPOSE: To describe the new sediment transport formulation in GSSHA and demonstrate the improved capability in predicting storm-total sediment runoff using a research-quality data set. BACKGROUND: GSSHA simulates overland soil erosion and outputs erosion and deposition for any size class of particles smaller than gravel with specific gravities greater than 1.0. The model first calculates particle detachment by raindrops and surface runoff, and then calculates the transport capacity of surface runoff using one of three user-selected transport equations. The actual sediment transport is determined by comparing the amount of detached soil and the trans- port capacity of surface runoff. Depending on particle size, soil transported to channels is treated either as wash load or bed load, with sizes less than the user specified value of sand treated as wash load and larger sizes treated as bed load. The original GSSHA sediment transport formula- tion was hard-coded to simulate only three size classes of sediment (sand, silt, and clay), each with a specific gravity of silicate minerals (S=2.65). The new GSSHA erosion routines have been generalized to allow simulation of arbitrary size classes smaller than gravels, each with unique specific gravity. Ogden and Heilig (2001) performed a detailed investigation of the CASC2D erosion formulation (Johnson 1997, 2000) and found that it greatly over-predicts storm-total sediment yield for events that are considerably larger than the event used to calibrate the model.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resource Software APPLICATION OVERVIEW and REVIEW Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    APPLICATION OVERVIEW AND REVIEW Public Disclosure Authorized Water Resource Software APPLICATION OVERVIEW AND REVIEW Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized By Carter Borden, Anju Gaur and Chabungbam R. Singh March 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 Water Resource Software 2 APPLICATION OVERVIEW AND REVIEW Water Resource Software APPLICATION OVERVIEW AND REVIEW By Carter Borden, Anju Gaur and Chabungbam R. Singh March 2016 3 Water Resource Software Acknowledgements Many individuals and organization have supported this analysis. Specific contributions of note include water resources software developers Deltares, DHI, eWater, NIH, SEI, and USGS responded to a software questionnaire outlining the functionality and applications of their products. Individuals at the Government of India’s Central Water Commission and National Institute of Hydrology provided valuable comments on their experience of WRS applications in India. Kees Bons provided further clarification of the Deltares software functionality. Apruban Mukherjee and Anil Vyas provided additional information on USACE HEC software. Finally, Dr. Daniele Tonina provided a thorough and comprehensive review of the document. 4 APPLICATION OVERVIEW AND REVIEW OVERVIEW The National Hydrology Project (NHP) is an initiative by the Government of India’s Ministry of Water Resources and the World Bank to develop hydro-meteorological monitoring systems and provide scientifically-based tools and design aids to assist implementing agencies in the effective water resources planning
    [Show full text]
  • GSSHA Initial Overland Flow Model Setup Setup and Run a Basic GSSHA Model with Overland Flow
    v. 9.1 WMS 9.1 Tutorial GSSHA – Modeling Basics – GSSHA Initial Overland Flow Model Setup Setup and run a basic GSSHA model with overland flow Objectives Learn how to delineate a watershed and then setup and run a GSSHA model with a simple overland flow simulation without using the hydrologic modeling wizard. Prerequisite Tutorials Required Components Time GSSHA – WMS Basics – Data 30-60 minutes Loading DEMs Drainage Contour Options Map Images Hydrology Projection Systems 2D Grid GSSHA Page 1 of 15 © Aquaveo 2012 1 Contents 1 Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 3 Importing DEM Data .......................................................................................................... 2 4 Computing Flow Directions and Flow Accumulations .................................................... 4 5 Delineating the Watershed ................................................................................................. 4 6 2D grid generation............................................................................................................... 5 7 Job Control Setup ............................................................................................................... 6 8 Uniform Index Map Setup .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Distributed Source Contaminant Transport Model for Military Installations
    DEVELOPMENT OF A DISTRIBUTED SOURCE CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MODEL FOR MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Billy Johnson1, Research Civil Engineer, Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180, [email protected]; Zhonglong Zhang2, Senior Scientist, SpecPro Inc., 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180, [email protected] Abstract Given the complex nature of surface water and groundwater interaction, as well as the spatial nature of contaminant distribution, a distributed source contaminant transport model is needed to accurately account for the movement of water and contaminants through the various landscape media where more simplistic models are not applicable, or are homogeneous which is not appropriate for the heterogeneous nature of distributed sources. This paper will discuss the current state of contaminant fate and transport development activities, by the Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), for the overland, upper soil zone layer, and channel regimes for inclusion within the Gridded Surface Sub-Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) model. The contaminant modules are being developed to specifically handle Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX) and Trinitrotoluene (TNT), however, the formulations are being described in a physical way such that other contaminants of concern will be able to be modeled by the system. The contaminant modules will account for each contaminant in the solid, adsorbed, dissolved, and vapor phases. In addition, parent and child products will be accounted for in the formulations. Finally, model validation studies for Camp Shelby are currently underway. This paper will discuss the current state of these validation studies and any future development activities being planned.
    [Show full text]
  • Physically, Fully-Distributed Hydrologic Simulations Driven by GPM Satellite Rainfall Over an Urbanizing Arid Catchment in Saudi Arabia
    water Article Physically, Fully-Distributed Hydrologic Simulations Driven by GPM Satellite Rainfall over an Urbanizing Arid Catchment in Saudi Arabia Hatim O. Sharif 1,*, Muhammad Al-Zahrani 2 and Almoutaz El Hassan 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Water Research Group, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-210-458-6478 Academic Editors: Hongjie Xie and Y. Jun Xu Received: 4 December 2016; Accepted: 22 February 2017; Published: 24 February 2017 Abstract: A physically-based, distributed-parameter hydrologic model was used to simulate a recent flood event in the city of Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia to gain a better understanding of the runoff generation and spatial distribution of flooding. The city is located in a very arid catchment. Flooding of the city is influenced by the presence of three major tributaries that join the main channel in and around the heavily urbanized area. The Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (IMERG) rainfall product was used due to lack of detailed ground observations. To overcome the heavy computational demand, the catchment was divided into three sub-catchments with a variable model grid resolution. The model was run on three sub-catchments separately, without losing hydrologic connectivity among the sub-catchments. Uncalibrated and calibrated satellite products were used producing different estimates of the predicted runoff. The runoff simulations demonstrated that 85% of the flooding was generated in the urbanized portion of the catchments for the simulated flood.
    [Show full text]
  • (OHD) Strategic Science Plan
    April 2010 Office of Hydrologic Development Hydrology Laboratory Strategic Science Plan OHD-HL Strategic Science Plan Executive Summary Executive Summary This Strategic Science Plan (Plan) establishes the directions for research in hy- drology at the Hydrology Laboratory of the Office of Hydrologic Development. It first establishes a cross-reference between the Plan and NOAA, NWS, OHD policy documents, and to the National Research Council reviews of relevant NWS programs, especially those recommending the development of a strategic science plan for hydrologic research at the NWS. Furthermore, the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS) article by Welles et al. (2007) high- lights the need for hydrologic forecast verification, and how this verification should be a driving force for new model development. A main section of the document is dedicated to the verification topic. This document is intended to be a “living document” to be updated on an annual basis. The Plan follows closely the outline of the Integrated Water Science Team re- port. In each section the Plan offers several subsections: where we are, in which it details what the state of the science at OHD is; where we want to be, where the Plan sets the new directions or reaffirms existing directions; what are the chal- lenges to get there, and a road map to reach those goals. The highlights of the Plan are: The Plan directs the research on hydrologic modeling seeking: • A more expeditious and cost-effective approach by reducing the effort re- quired in model calibration while keeping reliability in model forecasts. • Improvements in forecast lead-time and accuracy.
    [Show full text]