Alberta's Oil Sands: an Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alberta's Oil Sands: an Overview Alberta’s Oil Sands: An Overview Presented by Jim Carter to FEI Canada Jasper, Alberta June 2008 Oil sand A unique resource • Oil sand a mixture of bitumen, sand, water and clay • Two methods of viable recovery today: ¾In-situ—wells below 80 metres ¾Surface mining— accounts for most activity to date Oil sands in three deposits The Syncrude Mildred Lake plant site Athabasca Fort McMurray Peace River Cold Lake Edmonton Calgary Source: Athabasca Oil Sands Developers Oil Sands Related Projects Syncrude ConocoPhillips Suncor TransCanada JACOS Devon Imperial Oil Petro-Canada EnCana Opti/Nexen ATHABASCA CNRL Total E&P Atco TransAlta Fort McMurray Albian Sands Shell Husky Synenco PEACE RIVER Whitesands Kinder Morgan Fort Hills MEG Energy Connacher Birch Mountain Enbridge Korean Nat’l Oil COLD LAKE UTS North American Value Creation Edmonton EnCana CNRL Shell Calgary Imperial Husky EnCana Suncor CNRL Petrovera Shell Construction Capital Expenditure Forecast – New Records Predicted for Alberta Oil Sands 2007 Forecast: All Alberta oil sands projects including mines, insitu, upgraders, pipelines and co-gen plants. 100% all announced & discounted cases. 30,000 $47B spent to date 1996 - 2006 $83B forecast for 2007 – 2012 - Discounted 25,000 $124B forecast for 2007 – 2012 - All Announced Actual Forecast 20,000 15,000 $ million Cdn million $ 10,000 5,000 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Construction Capital Expenditure Construction Capital Expenditure Discounted Construction Capital - Actual Source: CAPP & Nichols Applied Management Forecast of Sustaining Capital & Operating Costs An Ongoing Mega Project for the Life of the Resource 2007 Forecast: All Alberta oil sands related projects – including mines, insitu, upgraders, pipeline and co-gen plants. 100% all announced case. 30,000 Sustaining Capital: 25,000 Year 2007 - $2.0B Year 2017 - $5.0 B Actual Forecast Operating Costs: 20,000 Year 2007 – $9.0 B Year 2017 - $22.6 B 15,000 $ million Cdn million $ Operating Costs 10,000 5,000 Sustaining Capital - 3 0 13 0 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sustaining Capital Operating Costs Alberta Oil Sands – Forecast of Combined Expenditures: Opex to Double Current Capex in the Next 10 Years 45,000 40,000 2007 Forecast: All Alberta oil sands relate upgraders, pipeline an 35,000 30,000 Construction Capital Operating 25,000 Costs Sustaining Capital $ million20,000 Cdn 2007 TOTAL $15.8B 15,000 d co-gen plants. 10 $9.0B 2017 10,000 $2.0B $7.3B $26.8B $22.6B 5,000 $5.0B $34.9B Actual Forecast d projects – including - 0% all announced case. Source: CAPP, Nichols Applied Management 1996 1997 1998 1999 mines, insitu, 2000 Sustaining2001 Capital 2002 2003 Construction Capital 2004 Operating200 Costs5 2006 2007 2008 Operating Costs Construction2009 Capital Expenditure 2010 2011 2012 Sustaining Capital 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Alberta Oil Sands Bitumen Production Forecast – At Least Triple in 10 Years 5,000 4,500 2007 Forecast: All Albe 4,000 Year 2006 – 1.1 M bpd Year 2017 – 3.1 M bpd (discounted case) 3,500 Year 2017 – 4.4 M bpd (100% case 3,000 2,500 rta oil sands projects 2,000 '000 Barrels per Day 1,500 1,000 500 ) 0 Actual Forecast 1996 Source: CAPP & Nichols1997 Applied Management 100% All Announced1998 Bitumen Production 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Discounted Bitumen Production 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 A 2013 ctual Bitumen Production 2014 2015 2016 2017 The rise of the oil sands industry Conventional vs. Oil Sands Production 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 Oil Sands 1,000 thousand barrels per day per barrels thousand 500 Conventional Oil 0 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Continuing Benefits: Oil Sands Permanent Operations Jobs – Wood Buffalo Region 25,000 2007 Forecast: Cumulative permanent oper located in the Wood Buffal 20,000 1998 15,000 2007 2017 ~ 6,600 people directly ~ Over 5,000 new jobs ~ 18,500 new jobs 10,000 5,000 o Region (does not incl Cumulative New Operations Jobs ~ nearly tripemployed by oil sands ~ nearly double 1998 jobs 0 le 1998 jobs ations jobs for oil sands projects Source: Nichols Applied Management 1998 Actual Forecast 1999 ude construction jobs). 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Wood Buffalo Urban Population Forecast 140,000 • • 2007 Forecast – Urban Popul 120,000 Does not include over 20,000 100,000 RIWG’s population forecast process has been approved by a third party audit performed 80,000 by Deloitte Touche Population 60,000 40,000 ation – Fort McMurray Urba workers currently in work 20,000 Actual Forecast 0 1996 Source: RMWB Census & Nichols Applied Management 1997 n Service Area/Saprae Creek camps and hotels/motels 1998 1999 Census-Fort McMurray/Saprae Cr. 2000 67,067 2001 Average annual 2002 population increase of 9% over past 7 years and 2003 expected average 2004 through to 2010 2005 2006 2007 Discounted2008 Case 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Development Case 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Wood Buffalo Urban Housing Demand Forecast 2007 Cumulative housing demand forecast for Fort McMurray 35,000 Current Avg. SF House Price1 Fort McMurray $605,495 30,000 Edmonton $417,150 Calgary $505,920 Current Avg. Rent – 2 bdrm2 25,000 Fort McMurray $1,680 Edmonton $ 877 Calgary $1,037 20,000 15,000 • Supply / Demand Gap indicated by high and rising housing costs # Housing UnitsRequired 10,000 • Timely land release plays a critical role in the solution 5,000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Built Total Demand Source: Nichols Applied Management 1 – Fort McMurray, Edmonton, Calgary Real Estate Boards July 07, 2 – CMHC – Spring 07 RMWB Municipal Tax Base Growth Forecast – Tax Base Will More than Triple in 10 Years 2007 Forecast of RMWB Tax Base Growth: Oil sands industrial assessment to grow 12% per year compounding for the next 10 years. 40,000 2007 tax payments by oil 35,000 sands companies ($120M) represent 66% of all RMWB 30,000 tax revenue. 25,000 20,000 $ millions 15,000 10,000 5,000 - 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: Nichols Applied Management Alberta OilSandsRoyalties:Historical &2007Forecast Source: Nichols Applied Management $ milion Cdn 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 - 2007 Oil Sands Royalty For 2007 OilSandsRoyalty 100% all announced case. all 100% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 US WTI $65/bblaverage $2.4 Billion Year 2006/07 Record Actual Forecast 2004 ecast: Basedonoilpr 2005 2006 2007 • takingsomeprojects investment Capital • Election & Suncor Bitumen Syncrude • Price Forecast(USWTI Lower $60/bbl) • High LevelofCapitalInvestment back topre-payoutstatus 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ice ofWTIUS$60/bbl. 2013 2014 2015 Reaching Payout Reaching New Projects 2016 2017 - $4.5 BandClimbing 2017 2018 2019 2020 Alberta Oil Sands – Royalty & Corporate Provincial Taxes Alberta Government Return Will More than Double in 10 Years 2007 Forecast: Based on oil price of WTI US$60/bbl. Includes Bitumen Royalty Option (BRO) for Syncrude and Suncor. 100% all announced case. 8,000 7,000 Year 2007: AB Corp. Tax - $794M Royalties - $1.8B 6,000 Actual Forecast Year 2017: AB Corporate Tax 5,000 AB Corp. Tax - $2.4B Royalties - $4.4B 4,000 3,000 $ milions Cdn 2,000 1,000 Royalties - 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Oil Sands Royalties WTI US$60 Corporate Tax Payments Provincial Source: Nichols Applied Management Input assumes $0.87 exchange rate Alberta Oil Sands – Royalties, Provincial & Federal Corporate Taxes. Combined Gov’t Return Will Nearly Triple in 10 Years 10,000 9,000 2007 Forecast: Based on oil pr 8,000 Year 2007: 7,000 AB Corp. Tax - $794M Fed. Corp. Tax - $887M 6,000 Royalties - $1.8B 5,000 Year 2017: $ million Cdn AB Corp. Tax - $2.4B 4,000 Fed. Corp. Tax - $3.7B Royalties - $4.4B 3,000 ice of WTI US$60/bbl . 2,000 1,000 Actual Forecast - Source: Nichols Applied Management Input assumes $0.87 exchange1996 rate 100% all announced case. 1997 1998 1999 Oil Sands Royalties 2000 Federal Corporate Tax 2001 2002 2003 Corporate2 Tax00 4Payments Alberta 2005 AB Corporate Tax 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Corporate2011 Tax Payments Federal 2012 Royalties 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Alberta Oil Sands – Comparison of Royalties and Construction Capital Expenditures – A Successful Regime According to Plan 30,000 • 2007 Royalty Forecast: based on oil price of • 2007 Capital Construction Expendit 25,000 20,000 15,000 $ million Cdn 10,000 5,000 Actual Forecasture Forecast: 100% 0 WTI US$60/bbl. 100% all announced case. Source: CAPP, Nichols Applied1996 Management Input assumes $0.87 exchange rate 1997 1998 all announced case. 1999 2000 Construction Capital Spending 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0 9 Oil Sands2 0Royalties WTI US$60 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Wood Buffalo First Nations Fort Smith Fort Fitzgerald S S Mikisew Cree a a s s k k First Nation a Athabasca Chipewyan a t t c c h h e First Nation e w a w e ca a Athabasca k a a s L n L ba n River a th Fort A Wood Buffalo Chipewyan National Park Fort McKay ad o R First Nation er t in W Fort McMurray No.
Recommended publications
  • Kern River, CA
    Heavy Liquid Hydrocarbons: Their Production and the Resulting CO2 Footprint Tony Kovscek Stanford University Energy Resources Engineering email:[email protected] First, a little quiz … Where does imported oil originate? Jan - Jul 2007 1%1%1%1%0% 4% 4%1%1% Domestic Production 3% 3% 36% 6% 7% 9% 9% 12% Energy Information Administration, www.eia.doe.gov Where does imported oil originate? 0% 4% 1%1%1%1%1%1% 4% Domestic 3% Canada 3% 36% Mexico Saudi Arabia 6% Venezuela Nigeria Algeria Iraq Angola Saudi Colombia 7% Kuwait Arabia Libya Mexico United Kingdom 9% Canada Ecuador 9% Brazil Equatorial Guinea 12% Other Energy Information Administration, www.eia.doe.gov Who has large proved oil reserves? Oil and Gas J., 2003 300 250 200 150 reserves (Bbbl) 100 50 0 Reserve≠Resource Reserve is energy that you can recover economically with existing technology. reserves (Bbbl) oil reserves? large proved has Who 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Saudi Arabia Canada Oil and Gas J., 2003 Iraq Iran Kuwait United Arab Emirates Russia Venezuela Libya Nigeria United States Today’s Presentation • What has Canada got? – What is heavy oil? – What is heavy oil? – Why do you care about heavy oil? • Heavy-oil recovery methods are energy intensive – Alberta Canada Oil Sands – Kern River, CA • CO2 foot print for heavy oil production – energy needed to produce heavy oil – implications for CO2 production • Summary USA-Alaska Middle East 80 Bbbl 1400 Bbbl conventional oil Canada 2732 Bbbl USA-Continental 137 Bbbl Venezuela Oil Resource 700-3000 Bbbl - Heavy Say that world What
    [Show full text]
  • Gastech 2017 Heads to the Land of the Rising
    VISIT OUR STAND C430, HALL 4 The O cial 2015 Conference Newspaper DAY FOUR Published by , and Friday, 30 October 2015 Gastech 2017 heads to the INSIDE THIS ISSUE 3 Conference Programme Land of the Rising Sun 5 CoTEs Programme Japanese and international industry leaders will examine the critical role 6 China’s gas-fired energy of gas and LNG for Japan’s future energy security at Gastech Japan 2017 in Tokyo. revolution is on the move The Gastech Conference & Exhibi- tion, Japan will be held 4–7 April 2017 in Chiba/Tokyo. This is the largest and most important business and technology event for the gas and LNG sector, creating Siemens technology is helping a global platform to address and discuss move gas through China’s vital the latest challenges faced in Asia and on and extensive WEGP system a wider international scale. 10 Observe unique design Gastech moves to Japan for the first time and is being hosted by The Japan requirements for LNG Gastech Consortium, which is made up of pumps and valves 10 of Japan’s leading energy companies, The Makuhari Messe International Convention Complex, the site of Gastech 2017, Fluor discusses the exclusive including: JERA; Mitsubishi Corporation; is located in the Chiba Prefecture along the shores of Tokyo Bay. design specifications of pumps Mitsui & Co.; Tokyo Gas; INPEX; ITO- and valves for LNG service CHU Corporation; JAPEX; JX Group— ENEOS; Marubeni Corporation; and Sum- 13 LNG projects pull itomo Corporation. big financing with Bringing the international energy eco- long-term contracts system to the world’s number one con- Special Focus discussion on sumer of LNG and leading global tech- developments and investments nology hub is an exciting and unique for emerging gas markets opportunity for the gas market.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade
    U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits March 2021 Submitted to: American Petroleum Institute 200 Massachusetts Ave NW Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001 Submitted by: Kevin DeCorla-Souza ICF Resources L.L.C. 9300 Lee Hwy Fairfax, VA 22031 U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits This report was commissioned by the American Petroleum Institute (API) 2 U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 4 II. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 III. Overview of U.S.-Canada Petroleum Trade ................................................................. 7 U.S.-Canada Petroleum Trade Volumes Have Surged ........................................................... 7 Petroleum Is a Major Component of Total U.S.-Canada Bilateral Trade ................................. 8 IV. North American Oil Production and Refining Markets Integration ...........................10 U.S.-Canada Oil Trade Reduces North American Dependence on Overseas Crude Oil Imports ..................................................................................................................................10 Cross-Border Pipelines Facilitate U.S.-Canada Oil Market Integration...................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Section 18.0 – Socio-Economic Impact Assessment Table of Contents
    Suncor Energy Inc. Lewis In Situ Project Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Assessment February 2018 SECTION 18.0 – SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 18.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...........................................................18 -1 18.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................18 -1 18.2 Study Area ......................................................................................................18 -1 18.2.1 Temporal Boundary ..........................................................................18 -1 18.2.2 Spatial Boundary ..............................................................................18 -1 18.3 Assessment Approach ....................................................................................18 -3 18.3.1 Regulatory Framework .....................................................................18 -3 18.3.2 Socio-economic Issues Identification ................................................18 -3 18.3.3 Valued Socio-Economic Components and Key Indicators ................ 18-3 18.3.4 Assessment Cases ...........................................................................18 -4 18.3.5 Assessment Criteria .........................................................................18 -5 18.3.6 Constraints Planning ........................................................................18 -6 18.4 Methods ..........................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Needs Assessment | Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
    WOOD BUFFALO HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT Wood Buffalo Regional Report Prepared by: Urban Matters CCC 2nd Floor, 9902 Franklin Avenue Fort McMurray, AB T9H 2K5 P: (780) 430-4041 May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES ..................................................................................................3 TABLES ....................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................1 KEY FINDINGS ..........................................................................................6 COMMUNITY HOUSING PROFILE .............................................................8 Demographics .........................................................................................8 Current Population .........................................................................9 Age and Gender Profile ..................................................................9 Ethnic and Cultural Identity ..........................................................10 Households ...........................................................................................11 Household Type ...........................................................................11 Household Tenure ........................................................................12 Economy ...............................................................................................12 Income .........................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Management Classification
    I.R. I.R. 196A I.R. 196G 196D I.R. 225 I.R. I.R. I.R. 196B 196 196C I.R. 196F I.R. 196E I.R. 223 WOOD BUFFALO NATIONAL PARK I.R. Colin-Cornwall Lakes I.R. 224 Wildland 196H Provincial Park I.R. 196I La Butte Creek Wildland P. Park Ca ribou Mountains Wildland Provincial Park Fidler-Greywillow Wildland P. Park I.R. 222 I.R. 221 I.R. I.R. 219 Fidler-Greywillow 220 Wildland P. Park Fort Chipewyan I.R. 218 58 I.R. 5 I.R. I.R. 207 8 163B 201A I.R . I.R. I.R. 201B 164A I.R. 215 163A I.R. WOOD BU I.R. 164 FFALO NATIONAL PARK 201 I.R Fo . I.R. 162 rt Vermilion 163 I.R. 173B I.R. 201C I.R. I.R. 201D 217 I.R. 201E 697 La Crete Maybelle Wildland P. Park Richardson River 697 Dunes Wildland I.R. P. Park 173A I.R. 201F 88 I.R. 173 87 I.R. 201G I.R. 173C Marguerite River Wildland Provincial Park Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park I.R. 174A I.R. I.R. 174B 174C Marguerite River Wildland I.R. Provincial Park 174D Fort MacKay I.R. 174 88 63 I.R. 237 686 Whitemud Falls Wildland FORT Provincial Park McMURRAY 686 Saprae Creek I.R. 226 686 I.R. I.R 686 I.R. 227 I.R. 228 235 Red Earth 175 Cre Grand Rapids ek Wildland Provincial Park Gipsy Lake I.R. Wildland 986 238 986 Cadotte Grand Rapids Provincial Park Lake Wildland Gregoire Lake Little Buffalo Provincial Park P.
    [Show full text]
  • Syncrude Implements Operations
    Connected Plant Syncrude Implement Honeywell’s Connected Plant Operations Management Suite to Formalize Work Processes Case Study “We are expecting a significant amount of return on investment over the long term, especially when we get more into the energy efficiency and optimization targets.” - Derek Hachey, Syncrude Benefits Syncrude’s implementation of Honeywell’s DynAMo® Operations Management, a software suite that includes Operations Monitoring (OM), provided help in formalizing work processes and work flows. One of the first benefits of utilizing OM, a core product within DynAMo®, was the realization and understanding of where Syncrude were not achieving critical targets. With OM, Syncrude has a consistent application of processing targets across the site and is now able to focus on moving forward with more of the energy optimization targets and building a standardized stewardship process around them. Background Challenge Syncrude is one of the largest producers of crude oil Prior to the introduction of Operations Management, Syncrude was attempting from Canada's oil sands. The company operates a large to manage the situation using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, with varying oil sand mine, utilities plant, bitumen extraction plant inconsistent application of the information between the extraction organization and upgrading facility that processes bitumen and and the conversion/hydro-processing organization. Syncrude needed a produces value-added light, sweet crude oil called standardized way to monitor operating targets. The use of new solutions Syncrude Crude Oil (SCO) for domestic consumption presented challenges in selecting the best solution for Syncrude’s environment, and export. The corporate headquarters are located in plus the issues arising from changing existing manual processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Oil's Oily Grasp
    Big Oil’s Oily Grasp The making of Canada as a Petro-State and how oil money is corrupting Canadian politics Daniel Cayley-Daoust and Richard Girard Polaris Institute December 2012 The Polaris Institute is a public interest research organization based in Canada. Since 1997 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies to take action on major public policy issues, including the corporate power that lies behind public policy making, on issues of energy security, water rights, climate change, green economy and global trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone: 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org Cover image by Malkolm Boothroyd Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. Corporations and Industry Associations 3 2. Lobby Firms and Consultant Lobbyists 7 3. Transparency 9 4. Conclusion 11 Appendices Appendix A, Companies ranked by Revenue 13 Appendix B, Companies ranked by # of Communications 15 Appendix C, Industry Associations ranked by # of Communications 16 Appendix D, Consultant lobby firms and companies represented 17 Appendix E, List of individual petroleum industry consultant Lobbyists 18 Appendix F, Recurring topics from communications reports 21 References 22 ii Glossary of Acronyms AANDC Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada CAN Climate Action Network CAPP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CEPA Canadian Energy Pipelines Association CGA Canadian Gas Association DPOH
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from the Fort Mcmurray Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Disaster
    Institute for Catastrophic Institut de prévention Loss Reduction des sinistres catastrophiques Building resilient communities Bâtir des communautés résilientes Why some homes survived: Learning from the Fort McMurray wildland/urban interface fire disaster By Alan Westhaver, M.Sc. March 2017 Why some homes survived: Learning from the Fort McMurray wildland/urban interface fire disaster By Alan Westhaver, M.Sc. March 2017 ICLR research paper series – number 56 Published by Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction 20 Richmond Street East, Suite 210 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2R9 This material may be copied for purposes related to the document as long as the author and copyright holder are recognized. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. Nothing in this report is intended to place blame or impart fault for home losses, nor should it be interpreted as doing so. The content of this report is solely to encourage improved preparedness for wildfires in the future by reducing the vulnerability of homes and other structures in the wildland/urban interface to igniting during a wildland fire event. Cover photos: Alan Westhaver ISBN: 978-1-927929-06-3 Copyright©2017 Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction ICLR’s mission is to reduce the loss of life and property caused by severe weather and earthquakes through the identification and support of sustained actions that improve society’s capacity to adapt to, anticipate, mitigate, withstand and recover from natural disasters. ICLR is achieving its mission through the development and implementation of its programs Open for business, to increase the disaster resilience of small businesses, Designed for safer living, which increases the disaster resilience of homes, and RSVP cities, to increase the disaster resilience of communities.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release – the New Suncor Energy
    News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Suncor Energy reports second quarter 2021 results Unless otherwise noted, all financial figures are unaudited, presented in Canadian dollars (Cdn$), and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), specifically International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34 Interim Financial Reporting as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Production volumes are presented on a working-interest basis, before royalties, except for production values from the company's Libya operations, which are presented on an economic basis. Certain financial measures referred to in this news release (funds from operations, operating earnings (loss) and free funds flow) are not prescribed by Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of this news release. References to Oil Sands operations exclude Suncor Energy Inc.’s interest in Fort Hills and Syncrude. Calgary, Alberta (July 28, 2021) – “Suncor generated $2.4 billion in funds from operations in the quarter while also completing significant turnaround activities in the upstream and downstream businesses,” said Mark Little, president and chief executive officer. “The improved cash generation enabled us to increase shareholder returns to approximately $1.0 billion, representing approximately 40% of our funds from operations and we’re targeting further debt reduction in the latter half of the year in line with our previously announced capital allocation strategy.” • Funds from operations increased to $2.362 billion ($1.57 per common share) in the second quarter of 2021, compared to $488 million ($0.32 per common share) in the prior year quarter. Cash flow provided by operating activities, which includes changes in non-cash working capital, was $2.086 billion ($1.39 per common share) in the second quarter of 2021, compared to cash flow used in operating activities of $768 million ($0.50 per common share) in the prior year quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge 2012 Corporate Social Responsibility Report Social
    ENBRIDGE 2012 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT SOCIAL PERFORMANCE ENBRIDGE 2012 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT ENBRIDGE .............................................................. 1 LA6 Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint management-worker health and safety committees that help ABOUT THE ENBRIDGE 2012 CORPORATE SOCIAL monitor and advise on occupational health and safety RESPONSIBILITY REPORT ................................................. 2 programs. ............................................................................... 43 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION ................................ 3 LA7 Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities by region AWARDS AND RECOGNITION ............................................ 4 and by gender. ....................................................................... 44 STRATEGY AND PROFILE ................................................. 5 LA8 Education, training, counseling, prevention and risk- control programs in place to assist workforce members, their ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE ............................................ 5 families or community members regarding serious diseases. REPORT PARAMETERS .................................................. 6 ................................................................................................ 44 GOVERNANCE, COMMITMENTS AND ENGAGEMENT ... 12 LA9 Health and safety topics covered in formal agreements with trade unions. ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of the Proposed Site C Dam on the Hydrologic Recharge of the Peace-Athabasca Delta
    Impacts of the Proposed Site C Dam on the Hydrologic Recharge of the Peace-Athabasca Delta Submission to the Site C Joint Review Panel Prepared for: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Industry Relations Corporation Fort McMurray, Alberta Mikisew Cree First Nation Government and Industry Relations Fort McMurray, Alberta Prepared by: Martin Carver, PhD, PEng/PGeo, PAg November 25, 2013 Project #501-06 Aqua Environmental Associates Table of Contents Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................... 9 1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Approach and Limitations .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.0 Hydrologic Recharge of a Complex Deltaic System .......................... 11 2.1 Controls on Hydrologic Recharge of the PAD............................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Recharge Mechanisms and Flood Zones .............................................................................................................. 13 2.1.2
    [Show full text]