DOCSLIB.ORG

Daniel Study Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Daniel Study Copy Daniel 1v1-2 During the third year of King Jehoiakim’s reign in Judah, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it with his armies. The Lord gave him victory over King Jehoiakim of Judah. When Nebuchadnezzar returned to Babylon, he took with him some of the sacred objects from the Temple of God and placed them in the treasure-house of his god in the land of Babylonia. “The Lord gave him (Nebuchadnezzar) victory over King Jehoiakim of Judah.” Who was King Nebuchadnezzar Who was he? From a human historical perspective: 1. The military leader of Babylon, considered a war hero, moved into power, and secured and alliance with the Medes by marriage. 2. He united the Mesopotamian region, and led what is considered to be one of the most influential empires in the Ancient world. a. He was a brilliant strategist b. He gave women more rights and freedoms than any before him c. He supported the arts and gave freedom for them. d. He was devoutly religious to the pagan mythologies of the day. He was considered one of the greatest leaders of the ancient world. I want to consider this phrase. It jumps out at me. I causes me to pause. Why? Because it says God handed over His people to a pagan King. A few years earlier, during the reign of Josiah, God had told the Prophet Habakkuk, that HE was going to do it. He was going to raise up the Babylonians to world power… (1v5-7) that He is actually using the Babylonians for His purpose. The Lord replied, “Look at the nations and be amazed! Watch and be astounded at what I will do! For I am doing something in your own day, something you wouldn’t believe even if someone told you about it. I am raising up the Babylonians to be a new power on the world scene. They are a cruel and violent nation who will march across the world and conquer it. They are notorious for their cruelty. They do as they like, and no one can stop them. Why would God do that? If I am honest, I would have been asking some questions of God… a. If you are a loving God, why would you allow bad things to happen to Your people? b. Are you in control? The Prophet Habakkuk responds, much the same way, with a question of, “are you crazy?” Which is essentially the question, “Are you in control?…but laced with more, “I think you are making a mistake.” "Are you just going to wipe us out?” God responds with what amount so a promise of, “I have this..and I have a reason” “Look at the proud! They trust in themselves, and their lives are crooked; but the righteous will live by faith…” The book of Daniel begins with this as the landscape: God sending His people into captivity, God granting victory to this man Nebuchadnezzar. I want us to consider the question: What was God up to with the Babylonians and Nebuchadnezzar? a. Dealing with His people and their lack of consistent devotion to Him. (Idolatry) There had been a history of Kings who, “did evil in the sight of the Lord,” and God had made declarations against them. 2 Chronicles 33v2 (speaking of Manasseh) He did what was evil in the Lord’s sight, imitating the detestable practices of the pagan nations whom the Lord had driven from the land ahead of the Israelites. He rebuild the pagan shrines his father Hezekiah had destroyed. He constructed altars for the images of Baal and set up Asherah poles. He also bowed before all the stars of heaven and worshiped them. His people had grabbed onto the religious systems and practices of the world around them, and had begun to weave them into their own worship of Yahweh. -Asherah poles -Pagan Shrines -bowed before ALL the stars b. Dealing with the great deception in the world. To really understand this Nebuchadnezzar, we began to study this pantheon of Babylonian gods. An Ancient deception… The ancient world believed in a pantheon (multiplicity) of gods. Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylon was no different. There are stories in the Old Testament, like the Tower of Babel, that are actually stories of worship to these god. (Tower was built and dedicated to the god Marduk,) When we used the term, ‘gods,’ I want to clarify this is with a small, ‘g.’ The way I was raised was to believe, ‘myths or idols.’ But I think we are getting this wrong. I came across something that struck me as I studied these gods that Nebuchadnezzar worshipped… One of these gods was Enlil (key) Enlil was considered as one of the Mesopotamian gods in the supreme triad, along with Anu (god of the heavens, also known as An) and Enki (god of wisdom and earth). This brings us to the question – what natural (or supernatural) element did Enlil himself represent? Interestingly enough, this is where the historians and linguists are baffled alike, with the very Sumerian word “líl” meaning ‘ghost or even haunted’. To that end, Enlil could be interpreted as ‘Lord ghost’, but that wouldn’t make much sense, especially given the importance of Enlil in Sumerian religion. So as a re-interpretation (with practicality taken into consideration), Enlil may have been portrayed as the ‘Lord of Air’ or basically a deity representing the sky and atmosphere. The concept of the Trinity in Babylonian mythology? Hebrew culture teaches God as Father, Son, Holy Spirit. Elohim - plural. (The Lord is plural, yet one God) This is a central tenant to who God revealed Himself to be. It caused me to start hunting for other similarities. It led us out of just Babylonian religion and to look at: Norse mythology, Sumerian mythology, Chinese mythology, and Hinduism As we went back and cross-referenced many of these old mythologies and religions, we discovered that many of them, not just Babylonian mythology, contain this idea of a, ‘supreme triad,” Additionally, the majority of all these mythologies and religions contain nearly identical elements of belief: a. Creation from nothingness b. Sacrifice for creation (a god was dismantled and the elements of his body created the world) c. a great flood d. a geographical center of the world e. Younger gods defeating older gods. In other words, there are patterns, similarities, and a central story in the majority of these world religions / mythologies. They are all espousing a very similar story with different characters. As I looked at these 5 tenants I realized I began to see what I would call the great deception. a. The Triune God in three persons is mimicked, in this, ‘supreme triad,’ of gods. b. The stories of Yahweh’s interaction, (relationship is exchanged for slavery) c. the locations of His interaction (Eden) are given fresh perspective. d. supernatural power exist in and through blood e. And inserted is the POSSIBILITY of a different, newer god taking over the older GOD. Consider this: If you create a story with all the same elements as an original story, but slightly adjusted, you have plagiarized the original, yes, mimicked the original, yes, but you have also inserted reasonable doubt about the original authorship. By inserting doubt, you have created a platform to deceive. The great deception? Consider: I will be like the most high….Isaiah 14 This is attributed to the enemy. It is the revelation of why he was cast down from heaven. The word, “be like,” is rendered “compare, liken, similar” The enemy’s first desire was to be, “comparable and alike,” to God. We know that Jesus declared this same enemy to be, “a liar and a deceiver." John 8v44b When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. If his original desire was to be viewed, held in authority like God, then perhaps we begin to understand the original deception: I believe the enemy has whispered through the ages, through the mythologies of the world, into the religions of the world, a very similar story to the real story of Yahweh, but one that is different enough to lead people away from the True God, to question the authenticity of Yahweh, and to see the God of the Hebrews as, “just another way to get to God.” So, to our question, “What was God’s agenda with Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians? Their gods. The Babylonians were leveraging a witchcraft power through ceremony from these “gods.” It was the same witchcraft power the vast majority of ancient religions were attempting to access. While being slightly different, they aim towards the same goal: Manipulative power, which can be harnessed through surrendering to the, ‘gods’. Nebuchadnezzar’s gods were not just mythological creatures. I would submit these were the demonic forces, principalities, rulers in high places, that Paul speaks of: Eph 6v12 For we are not fighting against people made of flesh and blood, but against the evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against those mighty powers of darkness who rule this world, and against wicked spirits in the heavenly realms. It hit me. God allowed His people to be taken captive for reasons that mattered deeply to him. 1. God had a desire to reveal Himself as the King of Kings, the God of gods, on a global scale to destroy the lies of the great deception. He was ready to set the record straight and reveal these Babylonian gods, who His people, Israel had begun to mix into their worship of Him, as nothing more than demonic mimics of the real thing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Reign of Nebuchadnezzar I in History and Historical Memory
    The Reign of Nebuchadnezzar I in History and Historical Memory “This is the first book-length study devoted to the reign of Nebuchadnezzar I, a Babylonian king of the late 12th century BC who is best known to students of ancient Mesopotamia for his recovery of the statue of the national god Marduk from its captivity in Elam. Nielsen achieves two feats of scholarship: he presents a lucid account of Nebuchadnezzar I and his times, and then traces his legacy right down to the Seleukid era, based on careful analysis of a wide range of cuneiform sources including literary texts. His investigation of historical and collective memory within the Mesopotamian cultural tradition represents a major contribution to ancient Near Eastern historiography.” Heather Baker, University of Toronto, Canada Nebuchadnezzar I (r. 1125–1104 BCE) was one of the more significant and successful kings to rule Babylonia in the intervening period between the demise of the Kassite Dynasty in the twelfth century at the end of the Late Bronze Age and the emergence of a new, independent Babylonian monarchy in the last quarter of the seventh century. His dynamic reign saw Nebuchadnezzar active on both domestic and foreign fronts. He tended to the needs of the traditional cult sanctuaries and their associated priesthoods in the major cities throughout Babylonia and embarked on military campaigns against both Assyria in the north and Elam to the east. Yet later Babylonian tradition celebrated him for one achievement that was little noted in his own royal inscriptions: the return of the statue of Marduk, Babylon’s patron deity, from captivity in Elam.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version of Article
    STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila HELSINKI 2009 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS AND SCHOLARS clay or on a writing board and the other probably in Aramaic onleather in andtheotherprobably clay oronawritingboard ME FRONTISPIECE 118882. Assyrian officialandtwoscribes;oneiswritingincuneiformo . n COURTESY TRUSTEES OF T H E BRITIS H MUSEUM STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY Vol. 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila Helsinki 2009 Of God(s), Trees, Kings, and Scholars: Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Studia Orientalia, Vol. 106. 2009. Copyright © 2009 by the Finnish Oriental Society, Societas Orientalis Fennica, c/o Institute for Asian and African Studies P.O.Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 B) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki F i n l a n d Editorial Board Lotta Aunio (African Studies) Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila (Arabic and Islamic Studies) Tapani Harviainen (Semitic Studies) Arvi Hurskainen (African Studies) Juha Janhunen (Altaic and East Asian Studies) Hannu Juusola (Semitic Studies) Klaus Karttunen (South Asian Studies) Kaj Öhrnberg (Librarian of the Society) Heikki Palva (Arabic Linguistics) Asko Parpola (South Asian Studies) Simo Parpola (Assyriology) Rein Raud (Japanese Studies) Saana Svärd (Secretary of the Society)
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • “Knockout” // Daniel 4 // Shining in Babylon #4
    “Knockout” // Daniel 4 // Shining in Babylon #4 (DANIEL BUMPER) We are so grateful for the rapid decline of Covid cases in NC! Both the CDC and Gov. Cooper have removed social distancing, capacity restrictions, & mask requirements for vaccinated adults, &, as such, like we announced on Friday, we are removing the request for everyone to wear them at our weekend services, except, for the time being, Summit Kids staff & volunteers will continue wearing them as a safety precaution. Of course, you are free to wear one if it makes you feel more comfortable. (Unfortunately, at campuses where we rent the space, we don’t set the rules, the venue owner sets the guidelines, so if you’re at one of our mobile campuses, your campus pastor will instruct you in what to expect.) And, of course, we will continue to offer Summit Online for those who feel at risk. Our goal is to make worship accessible to everybody, and that no one has to worship alone. So, that’s your PSA for this weekend. Good to see a lot of your faces, as we with unveiled faces behold the glory of the Lord together. Daniel 4, if you have your Bible. This is Mike Tyson. If you’re under 30, you may not know this guy, (don’t get confused, I know some of you thought that was a picture of me with my shirt off for a minute) but’s hard to describe what an icon he was when I was in middle and high school. He was, along with Michael Jordan, one of the 80’s great sports phenoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezekiel  Military Disruption (7:14-18) by Elder Betsi Moise  Economic Disruption (7:19-22)  Political Disruption (7:23-27)
    FOUR SYMBOLIC PARABLES PORTRAY JERUSALEM’S FALL (4:1-5:17) Sign of the City Besieged (4:1-3) Sign of the Prophet Lying On His Side (4:4-8) Sign of Eating Polluted Bread (4:9-17) The Sign of the Prophet’s Haircut and Shave (5:1-4) The reason for the Severe Judgment (5:5-17) THE DEVASTATION OF THE LAND (6:1-7:27) Destruction is Decreed Upon the Land (6:1-7) A Remnant Will be Spared (6:8-10) The Punishment is Just (6:11-14) JEFFERSONVILLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH The Certainty of the Judgment (7:1-9) Fall 2016 Adult Bible Study The Desolation Described (7:10-27) Social disruption (7:10-13) Ezekiel Military disruption (7:14-18) By Elder Betsi Moise Economic disruption (7:19-22) Political disruption (7:23-27) Nebuchadnezzar II’s Conquest of Judah: Under the Chaldean dynasty, and, arguably, throughout the rest of history, no king surpassed the glory and absolute power of Nebuchadnezzar II’s reign. As the crown prince (son of Nabopolassar), he defeated Pharaoh Necho II, who had come to the aid of the Assyrian army, winning for Babylonia the former Assyrian lands, including Israel. After being crowned king, Nebuchadnezzar forced King Jehoiakim of Judah to “become his vassal for three years. But then [Jehoiakim] changed his mind and rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar” (2 Kings 24:1). The king of Babylon, who did not take kindly to being rebelled against, captured Jerusalem and took the king and other leaders, military men and artisans as prisoners to Babylon (2 Kings 24:12-16).
    [Show full text]
  • Wilson, Studies in the Book of Daniel
    STUDIES facing] IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL A DISCUSSION OF THE HISTORICAL QUESTIONS yBY ROBERT DICK WILSON, Ph.D., d.d. WM. H. GREEN PROFESSOR OF SEMITIC LANGUAGES AND OLD TESTAMENT CRITICISM PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS NEW YORK AND LONDON Zbc Umfcfeerbocfeer press 1917 Copyright, 1917 BY ROBERT DICK WILSON Ube ttnfcJterbocher press, Hew J£orfe INTRODUCTION This volume is concerned especially with the objec- tions made to the historical statements contained in the book of Daniel, and treats incidentally of chronological, geographical, and philosophical questions. In a second volume, it is my intention to discuss the objections made against the book on the ground of philological assump- tions based on the nature of the Hebrew and Aramaic in which it is written. In a third volume, I shall discuss Daniel's relation to the canon of the Old Testament as determining the date of the book, and in connection with this the silence ot Ecclesiasticus with reference to Daniel, the alleged absence of an observable influence of Daniel upon post-captivity literature, and the whole matter of apocalyptic literature, especially in its rela- tion to predictive prophecy. method pursued is to give first of all a discussion The _ of some of the principles involved in the objections con- sidered in the pages following; then, to state the objec- tions with the assumptions on which They"are based; next, to give the reasons why these assumptions are adjudged to be false; and, lastly, to sum up in a few words the conclusions to be derived from the discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Politics Matters the Book of Esther
    1 Esther is not Yester… or Politics Matters The Book of Esther: A New Interpretation Robert Case Faith Presbyterian Church, Tacoma, WA 2017 Introduction “Lawrence of Arabia Overture” “Lawrence of Arabia Overture” was writing in l962 by Maurice Jarre for the Oscar winning movie, Lawrence of Arabia starring: Peter O'Toole, Anthony Quinn, Omar Shariff, Alec Guiness, Anthony Quail, Jack Hawkins and directed By David Lean. Considered by some critics to be the greatest movie ever made, The movie is a 1962 epic historical drama film based on the life of T. E. Lawrence. The film was nominated for ten Oscars in 1963; it won seven. The film depicts Lawrence's experiences in the Arabian Peninsula during World War I, in particular his attacks on Aqaba and Damascus and his involvement in the Arab National Council. Its themes include Lawrence's emotional struggles with the personal violence inherent in war, his own identity, and his divided allegiance between his native Britain and its army and his new-found comrades within the Arabian desert tribes. In 1991, Lawrence of Arabia was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" and selected for preservation in the United States Library of Congress National Film Registry. The overture is played by the London Philharmonic Orchestra. Maurice Jarre wrote all the music for Lawrence and won his first Oscar. His second collaboration with David Lean on Doctor Zhivago in 1965 earned him another Oscar. He collaborated with Lean again on Ryan's Daughter in 1970 and A Passage to India in 1984 for which he received his third Academy Award.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Babylonian Kings
    Appendix II A List of Babylonian Kings Dynasty Name Filiation Date (BC) or Regnal years Sumu-abum 1894–1881 Sumu-la-El 1880–1845 Sabium Son of Sumu-la-El 1844–1831 Apil-Sin Son of Sabium 1830–1813 Amorite Sin-muballit Son of Apil-Sin 1812–1793 Hammurabi Son of Sin-muballit 1792–1750 Samsu-iluna Son of Hammurabi 1749–1712 Abishi Son of Samsu-iluna 1711–1684 Ammi-ditana Son of Abishi 1683–1647 Ammi-saduqa Son of Ammi-ditana 1646–1626 Samsu-ditana Son of Ammi-saduqa 1625–1595 Iliman 60 years Itti-ili-nibi 56 years? Damqi-ilishu 26 years? Ishkibal 15 years Sealand I Shushi 24 years Gulkishar 55 years GÍŠ-EN? 12 years Peshgaldaramesh Son of Gulkishar 50 years Adarakalamma Son of Peshgaldaramesh 28 years Ekurduanna 26 years Melamkurkurra 7 years Ea-gamil 9 years Gandash 26 years Agum I Son of Gandash 22 years Kassite Kashtiliashu I Son of Agum I 22 years Abi-Rattash Son of Kashtiliashu I 8 years? Kashtiliashu II Urzigurumash © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004430921_009 Fei Chen - 9789004430921 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 09:29:36PM via free access A List of Babylonian Kings 203 Dynasty Name Filiation Date (BC) or Regnal years Harba-Shipak Tiptakzi Agum II Son of Urzigurumash Burnaburiash I […]a Kashtiliashu III Son of Burnaburiash I? Ulamburiash Son of Burnaburiash I? Agum III Son of Kashitiliash IIIb Karaindash Kadashman-Harbe I Kurigalzu I Son of Kadashman-Harbe I Kadashman-Enlil I 1374?–1360 Burnaburiash II Son of Kadashman-Enlil I? 1359–1333 Karahardash Son of Burnaburiash II? 1333 Nazibugash Son of Nobody
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Empire 9/13/11 3:47 PM
    Babylonian Empire 9/13/11 3:47 PM home : index : ancient Mesopotamia : article by Jona Lendering © Babylonian Empire The Babylonian Empire was the most powerful state in the ancient world after the fall of the Assyrian empire (612 BCE). Its capital Babylon was beautifully adorned by king Nebuchadnezzar, who erected several famous buildings. Even after the Babylonian Empire had been overthrown by the Persian king Cyrus the Great (539), the city itself remained an important cultural center. Old Babylonian Period Kassite Period Old Babylonian Period Middle Babylonian Period Assyrian Period King Hammurabi and Šamaš Capital of the stele with the Laws The city of Babylon makes its first appearance in our sources after the Neo-Babylonian Period of Hammurabi (Louvre) fall of the Empire of the Third Dynasty of Ur, which had ruled the city Later history states of the alluvial plain between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris for Related more than a century (2112-2004?). An agricultural crisis meant the Mesopotamian Kings end of this centralized state, and several more or less nomadic tribes Chronology settled in southern Mesopotamia. One of these was the nation of the Amorites ("westerners"), which took over Isin, Larsa, and Babylon. Their kings are known as the First Dynasty of Babylon (1894-1595?). The area was reunited by Hammurabi, a king of Babylon of Amorite descent (1792-1750?). From his reign on, the alluvial plain of southern Iraq was called, with a deliberate archaism, Mât Akkadî, "the country of Akkad", after the city that had united the region centuries before. We call it Babylonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel02.Pdf
    1 2 1 The Genealogy of Noah 3 4 2 The Cradle of Civilization 5 Timeline - Mesopotamia 6 3 7 SUMER Shinar (in Hebrew) Sanhar (in Hittie) Sngr (in Egyptian) 8 4 1ST DYNASTY 2nd DYNASTY ca 3500 B.C. ca 2330 B.C. 3rd DYNASTY Cities develop in Sargon of ca 2350 B.C. ca 2100 B.C. ca 2100 B.C. Sumer, forming Akkad conquers Naram-Sin, Ur-Nammu of Ur, Babylon, a city- the basis for Sumer and goes Sargon’s takes command state in Akkad, Mesopotamian to expand his grandson, of Sumer and emerges as an Civilization. domain. takes power. Akkad. imperial power. AKKADIAN EMPIRE ca 2500 B.C. ca 2280 B.C. Royal burials at Sargon dies, ca 2220 B.C. ca 2000 B.C. the Sumerian city- bequeathing control Akkadian Empire Ur destroyed by state of Ur include of his empire to his collapses following the invading Elamites. death of Naram-Sin. human sacrifices. heirs. 4th DYNASTY 9 5th DYNASTY OLD BABYLON KASSITE BABYLON 1792 B.C. 1595 B.C. ca 900 B.C. NEO-BABYLONIAN EMPIRE Hammurabi Hittites Assyrians emerge 612 B.C. 539 B.C. becomes king of descend from as the dominant Babylonians Babylon falls to Babylon and the north and force in defeat Assyrians Cyrus the Great begins forging an conquer Mesopotamia and and inherit their of Persia. empire. Babylon. surrounding lands. empire. BABYLONIAN EMPIRE ca 1750 B.C. ca 1120 B.C. 689 B.C. 587 B.C. Hammurabi dies, Nebuchadnezzar I King Sennacherib of Jerusalem falls to the leaving his code of takes power and Assyria destroys Babylonian army of laws as his chief launches a brief Babylon, which is later Nebuchadnezzar II.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel 4.1-37, Learning the Hard Way That God Is God and We Are Not Manuscript
    Learning The Hard Way That God is God And We Are Not Daniel 4:1-37 Introduction 1) C. S. Lewis calls it “the great sin” and with good reason. It is the sin that lead to the fall of Satan. It is the sin that led to the fall of humanity and drove Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. Of this sin Lewis said, “There is one vice of which no man in the world is free; which everyone loathes when he sees it in someone else; and of which hardly any people, except Christians, ever imagine that they are guilty themselves. I have heard people admit that they are bad-tempered, or that they cannot keep their heads about girls or drink, or even that they are cowards. I do not think I have ever heard anyone who was not a Christian accuse himself of this vice. And at the same time I have very seldom met anyone, who was not a Christian, who showed the slightest mercy to it in others. There is no fault that makes a man more unpopular, and no fault which we are more unconscious of in ourselves. And the more we have it ourselves, the more we dislike it in others. The vice I am talking of is Pride or Self-Conceit: and the virtue opposite to it, in Christian morals, is called Humility….According to Christian teachers, the 1 essential vice, the utmost evil, is Pride. Unchastity, anger, greed, drunkenness, and all that, are mere fleabites in comparison: it was through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride leads to every other vice: it is the complete anti-God state of mind.” (Mere Christianity, 108-109).
    [Show full text]
  • Political Memory in and After the Persian Empire Persian the After and Memory in Political
    POLITICAL IN MEMORY AND AFTER THE PERSIAN EMPIRE At its height, the Persian Empire stretched from India to Libya, uniting the entire Near East under the rule of a single Great King for the rst time in history. Many groups in the area had long-lived traditions of indigenous kingship, but these were either abolished or adapted to t the new frame of universal Persian rule. is book explores the ways in which people from Rome, Egypt, Babylonia, Israel, and Iran interacted with kingship in the Persian Empire and how they remembered and reshaped their own indigenous traditions in response to these experiences. e contributors are Björn Anderson, Seth A. Bledsoe, Henry P. Colburn, Geert POLITICAL MEMORY De Breucker, Benedikt Eckhardt, Kiyan Foroutan, Lisbeth S. Fried, Olaf E. Kaper, Alesandr V. Makhlaiuk, Christine Mitchell, John P. Nielsen, Eduard Rung, Jason M. Silverman, Květa Smoláriková, R. J. van der Spek, Caroline Waerzeggers, IN AND AFTER THE Melanie Wasmuth, and Ian Douglas Wilson. JASON M. SILVERMAN is a postdoctoral researcher in the Faculty of eology PERSIAN EMPIRE at the University of Helsinki. He is the author of Persepolis and Jerusalem: Iranian In uence on the Apocalyptic Hermeneutic (T&T Clark) and the editor of Opening Heaven’s Floodgates: e Genesis Flood Narrative, Its Context and Reception (Gorgias). CAROLINE WAERZEGGERS is Associate Professor of Assyriology at Leiden University. She is the author of Marduk-rēmanni: Local Networks and Imperial Politics in Achaemenid Babylonia (Peeters) and e Ezida Temple of Borsippa: Priesthood, Cult, Archives (Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten). Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Edited by Waerzeggers Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-089-4) available at Silverman Jason M.
    [Show full text]