Albertus Magnus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Albertus Magnus Albertus Magnus “Albertus” redirects here. For others with the same given began to study under Albertus.[3] name, see Albertus (given name). For the typeface, see Albertus (typeface). Albertus Magnus, O.P. (before 1200 – November 15, 1280), also known as Albert the Great and Albert of Cologne, is a Catholic saint. He was a German Dominican friar and a Catholic bishop. He was known during his lifetime as doctor universalis and doctor exper- tus and, late in his life, the term magnus was appended to his name.[1] Scholars such as James A. Weisheipl and Joachim R. Söder have referred to him as the great- est German philosopher and theologian of the Middle Ages.[2] The Catholic Church honours him as a Doctor of the Church, one of only 35 so honoured. 1 Biography Bust of Albertus Magnus by Vincenzo Onofri, c. 1493 Albertus was the first to comment on virtually all of the Albert was eldest son of the Count of Bollstädt.[3] It writings of Aristotle, thus making them accessible to seems likely that Albertus was born sometime before wider academic debate. The study of Aristotle brought 1200, given well-attested evidence that he was aged over him to study and comment on the teachings of Mus- 80 on his death in 1280; more than one source says that lim academics, notably Avicenna and Averroes, and this Albert was 87 on his death, which has led 1193 to be would bring him into the heart of academic debate. commonly given as the date of Albertus’s birth.[4] Alber- In 1254 Albertus was made provincial of the Dominican tus was probably born in Lauingen in Bavaria, since he [3] called himself 'Albert of Lauingen', but this might sim- Order, and fulfilled the duties of the office with great ply be a family name.[4] care and efficiency. During his tenure he publicly de- fended the Dominicans against attacks by the secular and Albertus was probably educated principally at the regular faculty of the University of Paris, commented on University of Padua, where he received instruction in St. John, and answered what he perceived as errors of the Aristotle’s writings. A late account by Rudolph de No- Islamic philosopher Averroes. vamagia refers to Albertus’ encounter with the Blessed Virgin Mary, who convinced him to enter Holy Or- In 1259 Albert took part in the General Chapter of [5] the Dominicans at Valenciennes together with Thomas ders. In 1223 (or 1229) he became a member of [8] [9] the Dominican Order, against the wishes of his fam- Aquinas, masters Bonushomo Britto, Florentius, and Peter (later Pope Innocent V) establishing a ratio studio- ily, and studied theology at Bologna and elsewhere. Se- [10] lected to fill the position of lecturer at Cologne, Germany, rum or program of studies for the Dominicans that fea- where the Dominicans had a house, he taught for sev- tured the study of philosophy as an innovation for those eral years there, and at Regensburg, Freiburg, Strasbourg, not sufficiently trained to study theology. This innova- and Hildesheim. During his first tenure as lecturer at tion initiated the tradition of Dominican scholastic phi- Cologne, Albert wrote his Summa de bono after discus- losophy put into practice, for example, in 1265 at the Or- sion with Philip the Chancellor concerning the transcen- der’s studium provinciale at the convent of Santa Sabina [6] in Rome, out of which would develop the Pontifical Uni- dental properties of being. In 1245, Albert became [11] master of theology under Gueric of Saint-Quentin, the versity of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum first German Dominican to achieve this distinction. Fol- In 1260 Pope Alexander IV made him Bishop of Regens- lowing this huge turn of events, Albert was able to teach burg, an office from which he resigned after three years. theology at the University of Paris as a full-time profes- During the exercise of his duties he enhanced his repu- sor, holding the seat of the Chair of Theology at the Col- tation for humility by refusing to ride a horse, in accord lege of St. James.[6][7] During this time Thomas Aquinas with the dictates of the Order, instead traversing his huge 1 2 2 WRITINGS diocese on foot. This earned him the affectionate sobri- quet “boots the bishop” from his parishioners. After his time as Bishop, he spent the remainder of his life partly in retirement in the various houses of his order and of- ten preaching throughout southern Germany. In 1270 he preached the eighth Crusade in Austria. After this, he was especially known for acting as a mediator between conflicting parties. In Cologne he is not only known for being the founder of Germany’s oldest university there, but also for “the big verdict” (der Große Schied) of 1258, which brought an end to the conflict between the citizens of Cologne and the Archbishop. Among the last of his labors was the defense of the orthodoxy of his former pupil, Thomas Aquinas, whose death in 1274 grieved Al- bertus (the story that he travelled to Paris in person to defend the teachings of Aquinas can not be confirmed). Albertus Magnus monument at the University of Cologne. geography, astronomy, astrology, mineralogy, alchemy, zoology, physiology, phrenology, justice, law, friendship, Roman sarcophagus containing the relics of Albertus Magnus in and love. He digested, interpreted, and systematized the the crypt of St. Andrew’s Church, Cologne, Germany whole of Aristotle’s works, gleaned from the Latin trans- lations and notes of the Arabian commentators, in accor- After suffering a collapse of health in 1278, he died dance with Church doctrine. Most modern knowledge of on November 15, 1280, in the Dominican convent in Aristotle was preserved and presented by Albertus.[3] Cologne, Germany. Since November 15, 1954, his relics Albertus’ activity, however, was more philosophical are in a Roman sarcophagus in the crypt of the Domini- than theological (see Scholasticism). The philosophi- can St. Andreas Church in Cologne.[12] cal works, occupying the first six and the last of the Albertus is frequently mentioned by Dante, who made his twenty-one volumes, are generally divided according to doctrine of free will the basis of his ethical system. In the Aristotelian scheme of the sciences, and consist of his Divine Comedy, Dante places Albertus with his pupil interpretations and condensations of Aristotle’s relative Thomas Aquinas among the great lovers of wisdom (Spir- works, with supplementary discussions upon contempo- iti Sapienti) in the Heaven of the Sun. Albertus is also rary topics, and occasional divergences from the opinions mentioned, along with Agrippa and Paracelsus, in Mary of the master. Shelley's Frankenstein, in which his writings influence a His principal theological works are a commentary in young Victor Frankenstein. three volumes on the Books of the Sentences of Peter Albertus was beatified in 1622. He was canonized and Lombard (Magister Sententiarum), and the Summa The- proclaimed a Doctor of the Church on December 16, ologiae in two volumes. The latter is in substance a more 1931 by Pope Pius XI and the patron saint of natural sci- didactic repetition of the former. entists in 1941. St. Albert’s feast day is November 15. Albertus’s knowledge of physical science was consider- According to Joan Carroll Cruz, his body is incorrupt.[13] able and for the age remarkably accurate. His industry in every department was great, and though we find in his system many gaps which are characteristic of scholastic 2 Writings philosophy, his protracted study of Aristotle gave him a great power of systematic thought and exposition. An Albertus’ writings collected in 1899 went to thirty-eight exception to this general tendency is his Latin treatise volumes. These displayed his prolific habits and encyclo- “De falconibus” (later inserted in the larger work, De pedic knowledge of topics such as logic, theology, botany, Animalibus, as book 23, chapter 40), in which he dis- 3 plays impressive actual knowledge of a) the differences he did record that he witnessed the creation of gold by between the birds of prey and the other kinds of birds; “transmutation.”[20] Given that Thomas Aquinas died six b) the different kinds of falcons; c) the way of preparing years before Albertus Magnus’ death, this legend as stated them for the hunt; and d) the cures for sick and wounded is unlikely. [14] falcons. His scholarly legacy justifies his contempo- In his Little Book of Alchemy Albertus said that alchemic raries’ bestowing upon him the honourable surname Doc- gold and iron lack the properties of natural gold and iron, tor Universalis. alchemical iron not being magnetic and alchemical gold In De Mineralibus Albert claims, “The aim of natural phi- turning to powder after several ignitions. losophy (science) is not to simply to accept the statements of others, but to investigate the causes that are at work in nature.” Aristotelianism greatly influences Albert’s view 4 Astrology on nature and philosophy.[3] Another example of his rea- son to formally search for the causes is in his treaties on plants, he begins with the principle, experiment is the only safe guide in such investigations. His studies of Aris- totle and theology show their colors in nearly all of his works and volumes. Albert placed emphasis on experiment as well as investi- gation, but he respected authority and tradition so much that many of his investigations or experiments were un- published. Albert would often keep silent about many is- sues such as astronomy, physics and such because he felt that his theories were too advanced for the time he was living in.[3] 3 Alchemy In the centuries since his death, many stories arose about Albertus as an alchemist and magician.
Recommended publications
  • Bishop Robert Barron Recommended Books
    BISHOP ROBERT BARRON’S Recommended Books 5 FAVORITE BOOKS of ALL TIME SUMMA THEOLOGIAE Thomas Aquinas THE DIVINE COMEDY Dante Alighieri THE SEVEN STOREY MOUNTAIN Thomas Merton MOBY DICK Herman Melville MACBETH William Shakespeare FAVORITE Systematic Theology BOOKS CLASSICAL: • Summa Theologiae St. Thomas • On the Trinity (De trinitate) St. Augustine • On First Principles (De principiis) Origen • Against the Heresies (Adversus haereses) Irenaeus • On the Development of Christian Doctrine John Henry Newman MODERN/CONTEMPORARY: • The Spirit of Catholicism Karl Adam • Catholicism Henri de Lubac • Glory of the Lord, Theodrama, Theologic Hans Urs von Balthasar • Hearers of the Word Karl Rahner • Insight Bernard Lonergan • Introduction to Christianity Joseph Ratzinger • God Matters Herbert McCabe FAVORITE Moral Theology BOOKS CLASSICAL: • Secunda pars of the Summa theologiae Thomas Aquinas • City of God St. Augustine • Rule of St. Benedict • Philokalia Maximus the Confessor et alia MODERN/CONTEMPORARY: • The Sources of Christian Ethics Servais Pinckaers • Ethics Dietrich von Hilldebrand • The Four Cardinal Virtues and Faith, Hope, and Love Josef Pieper • The Cost of Discipleship Dietrich Bonhoeffer • Sanctify Them in the Truth: Holiness Exemplified Stanley Hauerwas FAVORITE Biblical Theology BOOKS CLASSICAL: • Sermons Origen • Sermons and Commentary on Genesis and Ennarationes on the Psalms Augustine • Commentary on John, Catena Aurea, Commentary on Job, Commentary on Romans Thomas Aquinas • Commentary on the Song of Songs Bernard of Clairvaux • Parochial and Plain Sermons John Henry Newman MODERN/CONTEMPORARY: • Jesus and the Victory of God and The Resurrection of the Son of God N.T. Wright • The Joy of Being Wrong James Alison • The Theology of the Old Testament Walter Brueggemann • The Theology of Paul the Apostle James D.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander of Hales'stheology in His Authentic Texts (Commentary On
    chapter 13 Alexander of Hales’s Theology in His Authentic Texts (Commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, Various Disputed Questions) Hubert Philipp Weber As the first teacher at the University of Paris to become a Franciscan friar, Alexander of Hales has an honoured place in the history of the order. The greater part of his theological work was already completed while he was a secular master. It is therefore more correct to call him an important theolo- gian who influenced Franciscan theology. However, it is not easy to distinguish what makes him a ‘Franciscan theologian’. I will begin by offering some his- torical remarks on his life and his authentic writings, most of which were discovered in the twentieth century. Then I will continue by giving an impres- sion of his thought with a few examples from his writings. The final sec- tion contains a very short outline of the Summa Universae Theologiae (also known as the Summa fratris Alexandri or Summa Halensis) connected with his name. 1 Historical Remarks: Alexander’s Life and Work We do not know very much about Alexander’s early life.1 His surname indicates his origin, Hales in Shropshire, England, where he was born around 1185. He stayed in contact with England all his life. In the first years of the thirteenth century he arrived at the University of Paris, where he studied and taught artes liberales. From about 1220 he lectured at the theological faculty. During the conflict between the university and the bishop of Paris in 1229/31 he went into exile.
    [Show full text]
  • HNRS 2030 — Humanities Colloquium: Aristotle and Aquinas on Nature and Justice
    “It has been well said of Aristotle, ‘Solet Aristoteles quaerere pugnam’; ‘Aristotle has a habit of seeking a fight.’ He is seeking a fight not because he loves fight and enmity but because he loves peace and friendship; but true peace and friendship can only be found in the truth.” Leo Strauss1 “It will not be possible to conceal much longer from anybody the fact that St. Thomas Aquinas was one of the great liberators of the human intellect…. Thomas was a very great man who reconciled religion with reason, who expanded it towards experimental science, who insisted that the senses were the windows of the soul and that the reason had a divine right to feed upon facts, and that it was the business of the Faith to digest the strong meat of the toughest and most practical of pagan philosophies” G.K. Chesterton2 HONORS 2030: Humanities Colloquium Aristotle and Aquinas: On Nature and Justice Spring 2019 Through study of the writings of Aristotle and Aquinas, we will seek to understand what nature is and how it can be known, and then to consider the implications for understanding human nature and the question of how to live a good life, individually and in community with others. Attending to the influence of modern science as well as to the rise of modern society, we will ask what is living and true in the philosophy of Aristotle and Aquinas, respectively, and what has been superseded by modern discoveries. Instructor: James Stoner Stubbs 214 (tel: 578-2538); e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: M, 2:00-3:00, W, 1:30–3:30, and by appointment Books available for purchase: • Anthony Rizzi, The Science Before Science (Institute for Advanced Physics/AuthorHouse) [ISbN 9781418465049] • Richard McKeon, ed., Basic Works of Aristotle (Modern Library) [ISbN 9780375757990] • Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (tr, Robert Bartlett & Susan Collins) (Chicago) [ISbN 9780226026756] • Thomas Aquinas, Summa of the Summa [ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories and Images of Creation in Northern Europe in the Twelfth Century
    Art History ISSN 0141-6790 Vol. 22 No. 1 March 1999 pp. 3-55 In the Beginning: Theories and images of creation in Northern Europe in the twelfth century Conrad Rudolph 'Logic has made me hated by the world!' So Peter Abelard thought and wrote to his former lover, the brilliant Heloise, in probably his last letter to her before his death in 1142, after having been virtually driven from Paris by Bernard of Clairvaux, the austere Cistercian mystic and perhaps the most powerful ecclesiastical politician of Western Europe.1 Characteristically for Abelard in matters of self-conception, he was exaggerating. Logic had made him hated not by the world but by only a portion of it. While this was certainly an influential portion and one that had almost succeeded in destroying him, it could never do so entirely. In fact, logic had made Abelard 'the Socrates of the Gauls, the great Plato of the West, our Aristotle ... the prince of scholars'2- and this, this great fame and the almost unprecedented influence that accompanied it, was as much the problem as logic was. In a word, Abelard had been caught up in the politics of theology. The time was one of great theological inquiry, challenging, as it did, the very authority of divine revelation on the most fundamental level, and at a moment when both interest in secular learning and the number of students were dramatically increasing - all factors that can hardly be over-emphasized. But for certain elements within the Church, more still was at stake. And this was nothing less than a perceived assault on one of the basic underpinnings of the complex relationship between religion, theology, society and political power.
    [Show full text]
  • “It Has Been Well Said of Aristotle, 'Solet Aristoteles Quaerere Pugnam
    “It has been well said of Aristotle, ‘Solet Aristoteles quaerere pugnam’; ‘Aristotle has a habit of seeking a fight.’ He is seeking a fight not because he loves fight and enmity but because he loves peace and friendship; but true peace and friendship can only be found in the truth.” Leo Strauss1 “It will not be possible to conceal much longer from anybody the fact that St. Thomas Aquinas was one of the great liberators of the human intellect…. Thomas was a very great man who reconciled religion with reason, who expanded it towards experimental science, who insisted that the senses were the windows of the soul and that the reason had a divine right to feed upon facts, and that it was the business of the Faith to digest the strong meat of the toughest and most practical of pagan philosophies” G.K. Chesterton2 HONORS 3030: Humanities Colloquium Aristotle and Aquinas Spring 2013 Instructor: James Stoner Stubbs 240 (tel: 578-2538; e-mail: [email protected]) Office Hours: Mondays, 1:30-3:00 p.m., Wednesdays and Fridays, 9:00-10:00 a.m., and by appointment (call 578-2142) Course requirements: • Attendance at every class and participation in class discussion [15%] • Four 400-word essays on the reading, two on Aristotle, two on Aquinas [20%] • Two take-home exams, one each on Aristotle & Aquinas (Mar. 8 & Apr. 19) [30%] • Topic for final paper (due March 27) • Class presentation on final paper (during April) [5%] • Ten-page paper on modern-day Aristotelianism and/or Thomism, due Wednesday, May 8, 9:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Reason in the Summa Contra Gentiles
    Natural Reason in the Summa contra Gentiles RUDI A. TE VELDE A distinctive feature of Aquinas's Summa contra Gentiles is the central role the author assigns to natural reason in his project of manifesting the truth of Christian faith. Reason is supposed to give a rational account of the truth of what faith professes about God, to arrive at a veritas demonstrative!,) which will be shown to accord with the Christian religion. It is mainly because of this emphatic and what seems to be a rather presumptuous role of natural reason that the work has occasioned so much discussion and, consequently, diversity of opinion among the interpreters of Aquinas's thought. Is the Contra Gentiles, insofar as reason is the leading principle of the investigation, to be regarded as a kind of 'philosophical' summa) as it was sometimes labeled in the past? The objection immediately arises that the fourth book explicitly deals with those truths of faith which are above reason. And further, on account of its declared subject-matter—the truth of the Catholic faith—it seems unmistakably a theological work or, more exactly, a work in which the truth of Christian faith is expounded and defended. Those who stress the theological character of the work, a work written from the point of view of faith, usually refer to what seems to be the original title: "On the Truth of the Catholic Faith against the Errors of the Infidels."1 1. In early manuscripts of the work the title used is "Liber de veritate catholicae fΐdei contra errores inήdelium." See the Leonine edition of the Contra Gentiles in 42 NATURAL REASON IN THE CONTRA GENTILES 43 The riddle of the Contra Gentiles goes deeper than the question of whether it is intended primarily as a theological or as a philosophical work, based on reason as a common human faculty for truth.
    [Show full text]
  • St.-Thomas-Aquinas-The-Summa-Contra-Gentiles.Pdf
    The Catholic Primer’s Reference Series: OF GOD AND HIS CREATURES An Annotated Translation (With some Abridgement) of the SUMMA CONTRA GENTILES Of ST. THOMAS AQUINAS By JOSEPH RICKABY, S.J., Caution regarding printing: This document is over 721 pages in length, depending upon individual printer settings. The Catholic Primer Copyright Notice The contents of Of God and His Creatures: An Annotated Translation of The Summa Contra Gentiles of St Thomas Aquinas is in the public domain. However, this electronic version is copyrighted. © The Catholic Primer, 2005. All Rights Reserved. This electronic version may be distributed free of charge provided that the contents are not altered and this copyright notice is included with the distributed copy, provided that the following conditions are adhered to. This electronic document may not be offered in connection with any other document, product, promotion or other item that is sold, exchange for compensation of any type or manner, or used as a gift for contributions, including charitable contributions without the express consent of The Catholic Primer. Notwithstanding the preceding, if this product is transferred on CD-ROM, DVD, or other similar storage media, the transferor may charge for the cost of the media, reasonable shipping expenses, and may request, but not demand, an additional donation not to exceed US$25. Questions concerning this limited license should be directed to [email protected] . This document may not be distributed in print form without the prior consent of The Catholic Primer. Adobe®, Acrobat®, and Acrobat® Reader® are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and/or other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Summa Theologiae and the Reformed Traditions Christoph Schwöbel 1. Luther and Thomas Aquinas
    The Summa Theologiae and the Reformed Traditions Christoph Schwöbel 1. Luther and Thomas Aquinas: A Conflict over Authority? On 10 December 1520 at the Elster Gate of Wittenberg, Martin Luther burned his copy of the papal bull Exsurge domine, issued by pope Leo X on 15 June of that year, demanding of Luther to retract 41 errors from his writings. The time for Luther to react obediently within 60 days had expired on that date. The book burning was a response to the burning of Luther’s works which his adversary Johannes Eck had staged in a number of cities. Johann Agricola, Luther’s student and president of the Paedagogium of the University, who had organized the event at the Elster Gate, also got hold of a copy of the books of canon law which was similarly committed to the flames. Following contemporary testimonies it is probable that Agricola had also tried to collect copies of works of scholastic theology for the burning, most notably the Summa Theologiae. However, the search proved unsuccessful and the Summa was not burned alongside the papal bull since the Wittenberg theologians – Martin Luther arguably among them – did not want to relinquish their copies.1 The event seems paradigmatic of the attitude of the early Protestant Reformers to the Summa and its author. In Luther’s writings we find relatively frequent references to Thomas Aquinas, although not exact quotations.2 With regard to the person of Thomas Luther could gleefully report on the girth of Thomas Aquinas, including the much-repeated story that he could eat a whole goose in one go and that a hole had to be cut into his table to allow him to sit at the table at all.3 At the same time Luther could also relate several times and in different contexts in his table talks how Thomas at the time of his death experienced such grave spiritual temptations that he could not hold out against the devil until he confounded him by embracing his Bible, saying: “I believe what is written in this book.”4 At least on some occasions Luther 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glossa in Iv Libros Sententiarum by Alexander of Hales
    THE GLOSSA IN IV LIBROS SENTENTIARUM BY ALEXANDER OF HALES Hubert Philipp Weber Alexander of Hales, an Englishman, master of theology at the Univer- sity in Paris, who at the height of his career entered the Franciscan order, is an important but little known fi gure of the thirteenth century. His commentary on the Sentences is an early example of this genre and an early expression of his theology. Its form and method are still fl uid. Aft er a short history of the scholarship and some historical remarks I will characterize Alexander’s commentary formally by describing the known manuscripts and attempting to establish its date. Th en I will discuss Alexander’s method and his approach to the Sentences, which he was the fi rst master to use for his ordinary lectures. Finally, a few texts on various theological questions will provide an insight into Alexander’s theology.1 History of Scholarship For seven centuries the search for Alexander of Hales’s commentary on the Sentences was unsuccessful. Nevertheless, there is an early tes- timony in the writings of Roger Bacon, who claimed that Alexander was the fi rst to give lectures on Peter Lombard’s textbook.2 Surely Alexander was not the fi rst to use theSentences with his students, but he gave the work a new importance in that he employed it as the one 1 In would like to thank Sandra Lang, who helped me with the English text of this chapter.—Alexander of Hales, Glossa in IV libros sententiarum Petri Lombardi, 4 vols., Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi 12–15 (Quaracchi, 1951–1957), is cited as Glossa; idem, Summa theologica [seu ab origine dicta Summa fratris Alexandri], 4 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Pursues Their Primary Thrust Into Defining the Trinitarian Nature of God
    ABSTRACT The Aristotelian Development of Trinitarian Metaphysics Through the Thought of Boethius and Aquinas Andrew Bernard Eberlein Director: Junius Johnson, Ph.D. God was declared Trinitarian at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD. The divine nature is shared amongst all three persons, who are coeternal. This belief was made dogma and thus is held as the universal belief of the Church. This decision instigated a further theological pursuit to clarify this definition of God as Trinity. Boethius engaged in this endeavor in his De Trinitate. First, he determines his own interpretation of Aristotelian metaphysics, next how to express God metaphysically as a substance, and then how to define each person metaphysically as a relation. In his Summa Theologica, Aquinas continues and invokes Boethius work. He further classifies God, according to his processions and relations, and then he discusses how to assert personhood of God and the plurality of persons in the divine nature. He finishes by detailing what are appropriate terms for referring to plurality of persons and unity in God. This Thesis pursues their primary thrust into defining the Trinitarian nature of God. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Junius Johnson, Great Texts APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Andrew Wisely, Director DATE: _________________________________ THE ARISTOTELIAN DEVELOPMENT OF TRINITARIAN METAPHYSICS THROUGH THE THOUGHT OF BOETHIUS AND AQUINAS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Andrew Bernard Eberlein Waco, Texas May, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 1 Chapter One: Boethius on the Metaphysics of the Trinity .
    [Show full text]
  • Providence in the Summa Halensis an Innovative Reworking of Past Masters
    Simon Maria Kopf Providenceinthe Summa Halensis: Between Authority and Innovation Abstract: The doctrine of divine providence features prominentlyinthe 13th-century earlyFranciscan Summa Halensis. This chapter argues that the account of providence presented in the Summa is an innovative reworking of past authorities and maythus be counted among the examples of earlyFranciscan innovations.For instance,while John of Damascus claimed thatprovidence is part of God’swill and Peter Lombard took providence to be aspecific form of divine knowledge,the Summa Halensis ap- plies the Boethian notion of the ratio of providence to harmonize the two authorities, termingthe corresponding executio ‘government’.Thus the distinction between prov- identia and gubernatio,socentral to Thomas Aquinas’ doctrine of providence,isto be found initiallyinthe Summa Halensis. Introduction In his historical studyofAlbert the Great’streatise on providenceand fate, which shows the dependence of Albert’streatise in the Summa theologiae sive de mirabili scientia Dei on the Summa Halensis,¹ JosefGeorgenargues thatthe rise to promi- nence of the topic of divine providence in the 13th century,inparticular,atthe Uni- versityofParis, is, apart from its intrinsic importance and value for theologygener- ally, largely afunctionofthe theological and philosophical circumstances of the mid-13th century.Inparticular, Georgen suggests that the Parisian controversy be- tween Christian and Averroistic Aristotelians goes along waytowards explaining the increased interest in the doctrine of providence,not least because it was at- tacked, in various forms, by Latin Averroists,such as SigerofBrabant,and conse- quentlyalso dealt with in some of the articles of the condemnations of 1270 and 1277.² Pierre Mandonnet,Antonin Sertillanges, and Martin Grabmann, to name just On the question of the dependnceofAlbert the Great on the Summa Halensis,see also Parthenius Minges, ‘Abhängigkeitsverhältnis zwischen Alexander vonHales und Albert dem Grossen,’ Franziska- nische Studien 2(1915), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Franciscan Theology: an Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49865-4 — Early Franciscan Theology Lydia Schumacher Excerpt More Information chapter 1 Early Franciscan Theology: An Introduction For generations, the work of early Franciscan intellectuals has been regarded as relatively unoriginal: a mere attempt to codify and systematize the ideas of earlier authorities, above all, Augustine.1 Thus, the tradition of thought that was founded by the first scholar-members of the Franciscan order has been almost entirely neglected in scholarly literature. By contrast, the work of later Franciscans like John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham has garnered considerable attention, on the ground that they supposedly broke from their predecessors to develop innovative ideas that laid the foundations for the rise of modern theology and philosophy.2 The present volume proposes to make a case for the innovativeness of early Franciscan theology, that is, the theology that was formulated by first- generation Franciscans. These scholars flourished in the 1230s and 40sat the University of Paris, which was the centre for theological study at the time. In investigating the scholarly tradition they established, I will call attention to various aspects of the context in which they worked: most importantly, the intellectual context afforded by the recently established university, the context of the Franciscan order itself, and the philosophical context associated with the translation movement of the twelfth and early thirteenth centuries, which witnessed the introduction of many Greco- Arabic philosophical sources in the West. 1 Artur Michael Landgraf, Introduction à l’histoire de la littérature théologique de la scolastique naissante, ed. A.M. Landry, trans.
    [Show full text]