Sisk Biological Resources
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3.9 – Biological Resources 3.9 Biological Resources This supplemental environmental impact report (SEIR) addresses proposed modifications to the B.F. Sisk Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project, which was previously evaluated in the B.F. Sisk Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (2019 EIS/EIR). The project addressed in the 2019 EIS/EIR is referred to herein as the Approved Project; the Approved Project with proposed modifications identified since certification of the 2019 EIS/EIR is referred to herein as the Modified Project. This section of the SEIR describes the existing biological resources associated with the Modified Project, identifies the applicable regulatory framework, evaluates potential impacts, and describes measures to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate these impacts. The description of existing conditions and impact analysis focus on the Modified Project (see Section 2.4, Proposed Project Modifications and Clarifications). This includes analysis of the proposed additions to the Approved Project footprint depicted in Figures 2-4A and 2-4B, Modified Project Detail (“additional impact areas”), and change in use of Borrow Areas 12 and 14 (i.e., materials extraction instead of contractor staging area; see Figure 2-3, Approved and Modified Project Footprints). Biological resources within the footprint of the Approved Project (Figure 2-3) are not addressed here unless they are related to resources potentially impacted by proposed modifications associated with the Modified Project (i.e., within additional impact areas) or were not addressed in the 2019 EIS/EIR. These resources are still assumed present (or potentially present) within the Modified Project site but were addressed by the impact analysis and associated mitigation measures in the 2019 EIS/EIR. While the 2019 EIS/EIR addressed terrestrial biological resources and fisheries resources in separate chapters, this SEIR chapter addresses all biological resources for clarity and ease of reference. 3.9.1 Existing Conditions The information in this section is based on a review of pertinent literature (including the 2019 EIS/EIR and supporting technical reports) and biological resource surveys conducted throughout the Modified Project footprint (also referred to herein as the Modified Project site) (Figures 2-4A and 2-4B) from April to July 2020. The literature review included querying the following sources for special-status species and/or sensitive vegetation communities in the region: California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW 2019, 2020a, 2020b), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation online tool (USFWS 2020), and California Native Plant Society Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants (CNPS 2020a). The Soil Survey Geographic Database for California (USDA 2019) was also reviewed to identify potentially occurring special-status plants based upon known soil associations. Native plant community classifications used in this report follow a Manual of California Vegetation Online (CNPS 2020b) and California Natural Community List (CDFW 2020c). The 2020 surveys were conducted to more thoroughly examine areas identified as potentially supporting sensitive resources in previous reports and to determine the extent of those resources on the Modified Project site to inform regulatory permitting under federal and state laws discussed in Section 3.9.2. Focused surveys or assessments conducted in 2020 include the following: • Survey for nesting raptors (including Swainson’s hawk [Buteo swainsoni]) — April 13–15, 20 • Rare plant surveys — April 14–18, 20–24, 27–29; June 4–6, 11–12, 16–19, 22–26 • Multi-species burrow assessment and tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) habitat assessment — May 4– 8, 12–15, June 25–26 • Delineation of waters potentially subject to CDFW jurisdiction under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code — May 20–21, 26–28; June 26, 30; July 1 B.F. Sisk Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project SEIR 12206.007 June 2021 3.9-1 3.9 – Biological Resources • Vegetation community and land cover mapping — June 25–26; September 2–3 • Bat habitat assessment and surveys o Reconnaissance survey for roost sites — June 29 o Mobile acoustic survey — June 29 o Passive acoustic surveys — June 29–July 2 • Wildlife game camera study — May 22–June 17 3.9.1.1 Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types The following eight vegetation communities and/or land cover types occur in the additional impact areas: annual grassland, purple needlegrass grassland, scrub/chaparral, freshwater emergent wetland, valley foothill riparian, lacustrine, eucalyptus woodland, and urban/disturbed (Table 3.9-1). Vegetation alliances and associations mapped by Dudek in 2020 in accordance with the Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities (CDFW 2018) are listed under each general vegetation community. Because freshwater emergent wetland and lacustrine are considered jurisdictional aquatic resources, they are described in the Section 3.9.1.2. The remaining vegetation communities are described below. Table 3.9-1. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types within Additional Impact Areas Alliance Association State Rank1 Acres Annual Grassland Gum plant patches (Grindelia [camporum, Not mapped to association level S2S3 0.17 stricta]) provisional alliance Upland mustards and other ruderal forbs Not mapped to association level SNA 3.16 (Brassica nigra–Raphanus spp.) semi- natural alliance Wild oats and annual brome grasslands (Avena Not mapped to association level SNA 80.64 spp.–Bromus spp.) semi-natural alliance Yellow star-thistle fields (Centaurea [solstitialis, Not mapped to association level SNA 1.44 melitensis]) semi-natural alliance Annual Grassland Total 85.40 Purple Needle Grass Grassland Needle grass–melic grass grassland (Nassella Nassella pulchra, N. cernua, and/or S3S4* 9.86 spp.–Melica spp.) alliance Melica californica Purple Needle Grass Grassland Total 9.86 Scrub/Chaparral Coyote brush scrub (Baccharis pilularis) alliance Baccharis pilularis / Annual grass–herb S5 0.83 Baccharis pilularis–Artemisia S5 0.03 californica Scrub/Chaparral Total 0.86 Freshwater Emergent Wetland2 Cattail marshes (Typha [angustifolia, Typha (latifolia, angustifolia) S5 0.06 domingensis, latifolia]) alliance Mulefat thickets (Baccharis salicifolia) alliance Baccharis salicifolia S5 0.09 Fresh Emergent Wetland Total 0.14 B.F. Sisk Dam Safety of Dams Modification Project SEIR 12206.007 June 2021 3.9-2 3.9 – Biological Resources Table 3.9-1. Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types within Additional Impact Areas Alliance Association State Rank1 Acres Valley Foothill Riparian2 California sycamore woodlands (Platanus Platanus racemosa–Populus fremontii/ S3 0.70 racemosa–Quercus agrifolia) alliance Salix lasiolepis Fremont cottonwood forest (Populus fremontii– Populus fremontii–Salix gooddingii S3 0.22 Fraxinus velutina–Salix gooddingii) alliance Populus fremontii S3 0.31 Valley Foothill Riparian Total 1.23 Lacustrine Not Applicable Not Applicable N/A 6.47 Lacustrine Total 6.47 Eucalyptus Woodland Eucalyptus–tree of heaven–black locust groves Not mapped to association level SNA 42.22 (Eucalyptus spp.–Ailanthus altissima–Robinia pseudoacacia) semi-natural alliance Urban/Disturbed Not Applicable Not Applicable N/A 49.19 Urban/Disturbed Total 49.19 Grand Total 195.36 Notes: N/A = not applicable; CEQA = California Environmental Quality Act. 1 State Ranks of S1–S3 are considered sensitive per CEQA (CDFW 2020c). 2 Considered riparian habitat based on the definition provided by the National Research Council (NRC 2002). * The alliance is ranked S3S4; all associations within this alliance are considered sensitive. Annual Grassland Most of the additional impact areas are composed of annual grassland. The majority of the grassland areas have not been grazed recently and are dominated by tall non-native annual grasses and forbs such as wild oat (Avena spp.), brome (Bromus spp.), barley (Hordeum spp.), fescue (Festuca spp.), burclover (Medicago polymorpha), dove weed (Croton setiger), Australian saltbush (Atriplex semibaccata), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), and many others. Trees and shrubs may be present at low cover, including coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis) and honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) within the additional impact areas. Additional alliances containing upland mustards and other ruderal or native forbs (Brassica nigra–Raphanus spp.), gum plant patches (Grindelia [camporum, stricta]), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum) or fennel patches (Conium maculatum–Foeniculum vulgare), and yellow star-thistle fields (Centaurea [solstitialis, melitensis]) are incorporated into the annual grassland vegetation community. Annual grasslands occur in all topographic settings in foothills, waste places, rangelands, and openings in woodlands. Large amounts of standing dead plant material can be found during summer in years of abundant rainfall and light to moderate grazing pressure. Although annual grassland habitats consist largely of non-native annuals, these effectively prevent the reestablishment of native perennials over large areas and are considered climax communities (Kie 1988). The annual grassland vegetation community is not considered sensitive with the exception of areas within the gum plant patches (Grindelia [camporum, stricta] association). B.F.