Trends in Hospital Use by the Aged

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trends in Hospital Use by the Aged Trends in Homitall. Use by the Aged d, JULIAN H. PETTENGILL* data on hospital utilization by the aged since This article compares data from a variety 1963. Several measures of utilization including of sources on the hospital utilization experi- admissions or discharges per 1,000 population, ence of persons aged 65 and over during the days of care per 1,000 population, and average period 1963-71. These data show that, in the length of stay are employed. first 3 years fo7lowing the inception of Medi- In order to assess the impact of the HI pro- care, use of hospital services by the aged- gram, two questions are of particular interest : measured by days of care per 1~000 persons- increased at an average annual rate of 6-13 1 How much increased use of hospital services was generated in the first year of the program compared percent. Since 1969, however, hospital utili- with earlier periods? zation by this age group has declining been 2 What has been the continuing trend of hospital l-3 percent annually, mostly as a result of a use by the aped in more recent years? decline in average length of stay. Compari- son with similar data for persons under age Although neither question can be answered 65 reveals that a significant redistribution of with absolute precision, it is hoped that a compar- hospital care between this age group and ison of the data from several sources will provide those aged 65 and over has occurred since a range of values approximating the actual trend 1965. It is likely that aged persons increased csperirncc. their use of hospital services to some extent at the expense of persons under age 65. SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS OF DATA The data used in this paper are derived from ~MEDICARE’s two coordinated programs of seven different sources.2 A brief summary of the health insurance for the aged-a basic hospital principal features of each source is presented in insurance program (HI) and a voluntary supple- table 1. along with a discussion of some inherent mentary medical insurance program (SMI) - differences between these surveys that tend to went into effect on July 1, 1966. The primary goal complicate the comparison of their results. of the Social Security Administration’s Medicare Bs table 1 shows, none of the surveys are com- program is to provide insurance protection to pletely alike. Generally speaking, the dissimilari- help persons aged 65 and over pay a major por- ties are of two types: differences in approach and tion of their large expenses for hospital and med- design and diHerences of definition, in the broad ical care. The success of the Medicare program as sense of the term. a whole has been amply documented in a previous If classified according to their ultimate source artic1e.l of information, three distinct kinds of surveys are Financial protection was the main focus of the included here. Data were collected in both the program ; however, it was apparent that the aged Health Interview Survey (HIS) and the Colum- would probably increase their hospital utilization bia University Survey (GUS) from interviews of under the hospital insurance part of t.he program. individuals in a probability sample of households. Predictions about the probable size of the increase Data reported by both American Hospital ASSO- varied from 5-10 percent to 40 percent or more. riation (AHA) sources (Guide Issue and Hospi- This article measures part of the impact of the tal Indicators) wese collected in mail surveys of HI program by examining the existing sources of hospitals registered by the Association. The re- maining three surveys used individual case rec- *Division of Health Insurance Studies, Office of Re- ords: discharges in the Hospital Discharge Sur- search and Statistics ’ Howard West, “Five Pears of Medicare-A Statistical ‘For a more detailed description of sources, see the Review,” Socaal Securzty Bulletzn, December 1071. Technical Sate, page 11. BULLETIN, JULY 1972 3 TABLE l.-Pnncipal characteristics of the seven survey data sources Oeneral Reference Reference Institutional Nonre- description time period population coverage I sponae rate I-- National Center Annual general Multistage proh- 42,ooOhouseholds Independent Civilian non- All general or 5 percent for Health Sta- health data ability sample of containing 134,COLlweekly samples lnstitutlonal other special tistics, Health households within persons In which rcspond- populntlon living hospitals or hos- Interview Survey. *sample of geo- ents were queried at time of inter- pital unit of an graphic segments about experience view. institution except of previous 6 chronic, tuber- months Data culosh, or were aggregated psychiatric to annual figures’ fiscal years 1963- 67, calendar years 1967-69 National Center Annual short-stay Multistage prob- Approximately Annual data ac- Clvihan non- percent for Health Sta- hospltal use data ability sample of 210,MKIdischarges cumulated on a institutional tistics, Hospital discharge records from about 409 monthly basis population. Discharge Survey. within a sample hospitals calendar years of hospitals 1965-70 Columbia Uni- Measurement of Multistage prob- 6,604persons.-..- Two independent Old-age and sur- All hospitals and 12 percent verslty Survey. the early impact ability sample of samples inter- vivors insurance extended-care of Me&care. individuals viewed in April- beneficiaries. facilities ccrtifled I within a sample May 1966and for participation of geographic November- In Medicare and sampling units. December 1967In nursing homes which respond- not participating ents were queried in the program about experience of previous 12 months I American Hospital Monthly current Single&age 813hospitals..... Monthly survey Civilian resident Short-term gen- Not Assoclatlon, Hos- data on com- stratified sample Annual figures art population era1 and other available pital Indicators. munity hospital of hospitals aggregated for special hospitals utilization and both calendar and (community). Ilnances gg7Jjea% American Hospital Annual statistics Mail survey of all 7,123hospitals-.-. Annual survey Civilian resident All hospitals, ln- 7 percent. AsTciation, Guide of hospital utiliza- hospitals regis- Data generally population cludlng subgroups tion and finances tered with the refer to the 12 such as eom- AHA in the U 8 months ending munity hospitals y;p7pr 3% Bodal 6ecurity Monthly, quar- Single-stage Approximately Records were All persons en- All hospitals 3 percent Administration, terly, and annual stratifled sample 39,ooOhospital sampled monthly rolled in the HI certified for par- Current Medicare statistics on dis- of all hospital stays per year. Annual figures program ticipation in the Survey charges covered admission notices arc aggregated for HI program by the HI pro- both calendar and gram, with days asc;lps, of care and charges I -- Social Security Annual statistica Census of all 100percent _______ Claims data are All persons en- All hospitals ----m-_---*-m Administration, of claims for claims records accumulated rolled in the HI centificd for g;z;.F Control hospital care continuously. program partleipation in covered under HI Annual flgnrcs the HI program program. are aggregated for both calendar and gg7;esrs, vey (HDS), paid claims in the Medicare Control As a result the levels of hospital use estimated Records (MCR) , and admission notices in the from different sources are not strictly comparable. Current Medicare Survey (CMS) data. ’ Household survey data, for example, exclude the Definitional differences among the surveys in- experience of persons who died in the hospital or volve such questions as who is included in the who died after discharge but before the interview survey, what is considered hospital utilization, date. These data also contain substantial under- and when the reported hospital use occurred. reporting (5-10 percent 3) in the amount of hos- These surveys do not measure hospital utilization pital use by respondents. Thus the level of use for the same population, nor do they have a single common hospital universe or even an identical ‘iWHS Vital and Health ki’tatistics, Series 2, n’os. 6 time frame. and 7. 4 SOCIAL SECURITY estimat,ed from household data will not corre- has been published for the HDS, HIS, CMS,‘&d spond with the results from other types of sur- CUS data. Although the relative errors range veys. from 2.5 percent to about 6 percent, there is no For the purpose of comparing rates of change conclusive evidence of a radical difference among of hospital utilization over time, the situation is surveys. somewhat better. Since each individual survey has Neither the MCR nor the AHA Guide Issue remained reasonably consistent during the period data are subject to sampling variability since in terms of its design, techniques, and definitions, these are derived from a complete enumeration of annual rates of change estimated from different the relevant universe rather than a sample. These sources should be approximately the same. data have limitations, however. MCR data for Rates of change cannot be expected to match recent years are incomplete because of lags in the exactly, however. In any given year, each survey filing and processing of claims; AHA Guide Issue measures the hospital utilization experience of a data do not provide utilization estimates for dif- different group of people, in a different set of ferent age groups. hospitals, during a different 12-month period. The seven data sources do not provide equally Such definitional differences will cause rates of precise estimates of hospital use. A ranking of change reported by different surveys to vary surveys in descending order of precision would somewhat, although the size of the differences probably begin with those based on complete enu- should be small. meration (MCR and AHA Guide Issue data) and A larger proportion of the disparities among end with those based on household interviews the rates of change from various surveys is proba- (HIS and CUS data). bly due to the inherent variability of survey data Variation in rates of change reported by the that results from errors of sampling and measure- different sources makes comparison more difficult.
Recommended publications
  • Omaha, Nebraska, Experienced Urban Uprisings the Safeway and Skaggs in 1966, 1968, and 1969
    Nebraska National Guardsmen confront protestors at 24th and Maple Streets in Omaha, July 5, 1966. NSHS RG2467-23 82 • NEBRASKA history THEN THE BURNINGS BEGAN Omaha’s Urban Revolts and the Meaning of Political Violence BY ASHLEY M. HOWARD S UMMER 2017 • 83 “ The Negro in the Midwest feels injustice and discrimination no 1 less painfully because he is a thousand miles from Harlem.” DAVID L. LAWRENCE Introduction National in scope, the commission’s findings n August 2014 many Americans were alarmed offered a groundbreaking mea culpa—albeit one by scenes of fire and destruction following the that reiterated what many black citizens already Ideath of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. knew: despite progressive federal initiatives and Despite the prevalence of violence in American local agitation, long-standing injustices remained history, the protest in this Midwestern suburb numerous and present in every black community. took many by surprise. Several factors had rocked In the aftermath of the Ferguson uprisings, news Americans into a naïve slumber, including the outlets, researchers, and the Justice Department election of the country’s first black president, a arrived at a similar conclusion: Our nation has seemingly genial “don’t-rock-the-boat” Midwestern continued to move towards “two societies, one attitude, and a deep belief that racism was long black, one white—separate and unequal.”3 over. The Ferguson uprising shook many citizens, To understand the complexity of urban white and black, wide awake. uprisings, both then and now, careful attention Nearly fifty years prior, while the streets of must be paid to local incidents and their root Detroit’s black enclave still glowed red from five causes.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 1568 - Richard Gallegos V
    Appeal No. 1568 - Richard Gallegos v. US - 7 July, 1966. ________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT NO. Z-659500-D4 AND ALL OTHER SEAMAN DOCUMENTS Issued to: Richard Gallegos DECISION OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 1568 Richard Gallegos This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 22 September 1965 an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas suspended Appellant's seaman documents for 12 months outright upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as Able Seaman on board the United States SS DEL VALLE under authority of the document above described, during the period from 1 July 1965 to 9 September 1965, Appellant wrongfully absented himself from his duties on or about 21 July 1965 and on or about 11 August 1965, while the vessel was in a foreign port; that on or about 22 july 1965 while the vessel was in a foreign port Appellant wrongfully failed to perform his duties by reason of intoxication; that on or about 8 august 1965, while the vessel was underway in a foreign harbor, Appellant wrongfully failed to perform duty as a watchstander on wheel and lookout watches. At the hearing, Appellant did not appear and was not represented by counsel. A plea of not guilty to the charge and file:////hqsms-lawdb/users/KnowledgeManagement...%20R%201479%20-%201679/1568%20-%20GALLEGOS.htm (1 of 4) [02/10/2011 10:55:18 AM] Appeal No.
    [Show full text]
  • ESTIMATES of the POPULATION of STATES, by AGE 1960 to 1966 with Provisional Estimates for July 1, 1967
    Series P - 25, No. 384 February:13, 1968 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF STATES, BY AGE 1960 TO 1966 With Provisional Estimates For July 1, 1967 J::STIMATEDPOPULATION 21 YEARS OLD AND OVER, BY STATE, JULY 1, 1966, AND PERCENT CHANGE SINCE 1960 (Population shown in thousands)' N. OAK. 358 S. OAK. 381 ..I11III 15.0 to 20.9 _ 9.5 to 14.9 U.S. 115.5 million; Em 4.5 to 9.4 percent increase 6.8 m LO to 4.0 D Less than 1.0 or loss DEPARTMENT OF CO ..... ERCE BUREA.U CONTENTS Page Methodology . '. 1 Estimates for 1966 .........................' ........................... 1 Estimates for 1961 to 1965 ................... -........................... 2 Provisional estimates for 1967 .................... ;. ....................... 2 Population base ........................................................ 3 Sources of data . 3 Accuracy of estimates .............................................. "..... 3 Comparison of published estimates of the population 65 years old and over with Medicare sta tistics . 4 Related reports ........................................................ 5 Rounding of estimates .................................................... 5 DETAILED TABLES Table Page l.--Estimates of the total resident populatlOn, by age, for States: July 1, 1966. 6 2.--Total residept populationi by age, for States: April 1, 1960 . 7 3.--Percent change in total resident population, by age, for States: April 1, 1960, to July 1, 1966 . 8 4.--Percent distribution of the estimated total resident population, by age, for States, July 1, 1966, with comparative figures for April 1, 1960 ............. " . 9 5.--Estimates of the total resident population, by age, for States: July 1,1961 to 1965. .. La 6.--Provisional estimates of the total resident population, by age, for States: July 1, 1967. .. 15 For sale by the Superintendent oj Documents, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download JULY 1966.Pdf
    JULY 1966 ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES J. EDGAR HOOVER, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE JULY 1966 VOL. 35 NO.7 THE COVER-The Lib· erty Bell. See Mr. Hoovefs message on page 1. LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN CONTENTS Message From Director J. Edgar Hoover . 1 Profiles in Crime . .. 2 A Matter of Mutual Respect, by Hon. Herbert G. Klein, Editor, San Diego Union, San Diego, Calif. ..... 6 Investigators' Aids . 8 Alice in a Patrol Car, by Dwight]. Dalbey, Inspec­ tor, Federal Bureau of Investigation 9 Nationwide Crimes cope . .. 11 Civilian Review Boards in Review, by Ralph G. Murdy, Managing Director, Criminal Justice Published by the Commission, Baltimore, Md. 14 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Wanted by the FBI. 28 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, D.C. 20535 INDEPENDENCE DAY is a glorious and mean· we love our country, why should we be ashamed ingful holiday. It commemorates the birth of a to say so? new Nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated In much of the world today, young people are to the belief that all men are created equal. It being indoctrinated with atheistic communism, commemorates the courageous stand of Ameri· a false dogma which imprisons the minds and can patriots for the principle that freedom under souls of men. Communists and their followers God is man's destiny. And it reminds us that are strong and dedicated. Their goal is to en· there is still virtue in recognizing and supporting slave the world. If young Americans, our future the ideals of our great heritage. leaders, are to resist and turn back this interna· In the past 190 years, patriotism has been a tional conspiracy, they must know what they sustaining power for America in her darkest stand for.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Midland Texas Housing Market As of August 1 1966
    ll,8,l '.sr:7 FAL fft i+t -r'{4, T*{' t16b W"ltfr"e MIDLAND, TEXAS HOUSING MARKET as of August 1, 1966 ffs^slr{tl;il';t;:",.u'" $ltHlllcTof{' -- i9'ot M.i.: 1 1 A Report by the DEPARTMENT OF HOUSTNG AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAT HOUSING ADMIN !STRATION WASH INGTON, D. C . 20111 Moy 1967 I ANALYSIS OF THE MTDLAND TEXAS HOUSING AS OF AUGUST 1 L966 ., . r,?' r,,:.n'i.lF-ilo'l:' i,i '' 1, r, , rl , irrc " )N' ,- tNAsltlNGl ' t! " i 1 19tt/ Field MarkeE Analysis Service Federal Housing Admlnistration Department of Housing and Urban Development. Foresord As a publ.lc eervlce to a66ist local houslng actlvities through clearer understanding of local housing markeE condlEions, FllA lnltlated publlcatlon of lts compreheneive housing markeE analyses early ln 1955. Whlle each report ls deslgned specifically for FHA use ln admlnlsterlng lts mortgage lnsurance operaEions, 1t ls expected that the factual informaElon and Ehe flndings and concluslons of Ehese reporEs wtll be generally useful also to bullders, mortg,ageee, and othere concerned with local housing problems and to othere having an lnterest in local economic con- dltlons and trends. Slnce aarket analyeis is not an exsct sclence, Ehe judgmental factor 1s lmportant ln the developnent of findtngs and conclusions. There wlll be dlfferences of opinlon, of course, in the lnter- protatlon of avallable factual lnformatlon in determining the absorpt,lve capacity of the market and the requiremenEs for main- tenance of a reaeonable balance ln demand-supply relatlonships. The factual'framework for each analysis is developed as thoroughly as poaslble on the basle of lnformation available from boEh local and natlonal lources.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 1643 - Jose F
    Appeal No. 1643 - Jose F. ALFONSO v. US - 5 July, 1967. ________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT NO. Z-605907 AND ALL OTHER SEAMAN'S DOCUMENTS Issued to: Jose F. ALFONSO DECISION OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 1643 Jose F. ALFONSO This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 4 August 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Long Beach, California, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 3 months outright plus 3 months on 6 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as an A.B. seaman on board the United States SS LAKEWOOD VICTORY under authority of the document above described, Appellant on 1 and 2 June, 1966, at Suyon, Korea, and on 21, 22, and 23 June 1966, at Bangkok, Thailand, wrongfully failed to perform his duties. At the hearing, Appellant failed to appear. The Examiner entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced in evidence voyage records of SS LAKEWOOD VICTORY touching on the matters in question. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written file:////hqsms-lawdb/users/KnowledgeManagement...&%20R%201479%20-%201679/1643%20-%20ALFONSO.htm (1 of 5) [02/10/2011 11:07:08 AM] Appeal No. 1643 - Jose F. ALFONSO v. US - 5 July, 1967. decision in which he concluded that the charge and specifications had been proved.
    [Show full text]
  • Commandant's Annual Report, 1966-1967
    COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT 1966 - 1967 The Judge Advocate General's School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia "Since its formation, your school has established an enviable record that has earned the respect and-admiration of the entire Army. The manner in which the graduates of the United States Army Judge Advocate General's School accomplish their varied duties throughout the world reflects greatly on the fulfillment of your mission." JOHN J. TOLSON Major General, USA Commandant United States Army Aviation School "The Judge Advocate General's Corps has established a reputa­ tion for high professional standards and, through the administm­ tion of military justice, has significantly contributed to the well­ being of the individual soldier. The skillful performance of the graduates of the Judge Advocate General's School can be attributed in a great measure to the professional ability of your staff and faculty." ROBERT H. YORK Major General; USA Commandant United States Army Infantry School "What they [Thai students] acquired at the School was not only the United States' Military law, which would be applied in improv­ ing our system, but other sociological knowledge as wen. Mutual understanding is vital, in the light of world affairs today, especial­ ly as our countries have cooperated closely in so many fields, both bilaterally and as fellow members of the South East Asia Treaty Organization." GENERAL PRAPHAN KULAPICHITR Under-Secretary of the Ministry of Defense Bangkok, Thailand "The Board is unanimously of the opinion that The Judge Ad­ vocate General's School is being maintained and conducted in the highest traditions of the United States Army, both as a military establishment and as an academic institution; and the Board com­ mends the Commandant and his staff for their outstanding work." Report of the Board of Visitors The Judge Advocate General's School, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Art. 15, Repertory, Suppl. 4, Vol. I (1966-1969)
    ARTICLE 15 CONTENTS Text of Article 15 Paragraphs Note 1-5 >sl I: Annex: Reports of principal organs to the General Assembly with the relevant agenda items 198 ARTICLE 15 TEXT OF ARTICLE 15 1. The General Assembly shall receive and consider annual and special reports from the Security Council; these reports shall include an account of the measures that the Security Council has decided upon or taken to maintain international peace and secu- rity. 2. The General Assembly shall receive and consider reports from the other organs of the United Nations. NOTE 1. Except for the case described below, there was no 1968 and wished to submit the report to the General As- change in the application of this Article. From the twenty- sembly at its following regular session. The Court felt that first to the twenty-fourth session, the General Assembly such a report, the first of its kind, would contribute to a dealt with the reports according to the standard procedure better understanding of its functions and of its activities which was described in the Repertory.1 within the framework of the United Nations. 2. At the twenty-third session, the General Assembly had 4. Rule 13 (b) of the General Assembly's rules of proce- before it a request by the Secretary-General for the inclu- dure provides that the provisional agenda of a regular ses- sion in the agenda of a supplementary item entitled "Re- sion shall include, inter alia, the reports of the Interna- port of the International Court of Justice".2 tional Court of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Generl Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED L/2336/Add.2 GENERL AGREEMENT ON 10 May 1965 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution Original: English RESIDUAL IMPORT RESTRICTIONS Addendum DENMARK The Government of Denmarmk has submitted the following detailed plans for liberalization, as had been forecast in the basic Danish notification of residual import restrictions (L/2336, page 19). It is the intention of the Danish Government to abolish the remaining quan- titative import restrictions on goods listed from Chapter 25 to the end of the Brussels Nomenclature and restrictions on some goods listed in Chapters 17 to 21, not later than 31 December 1966, as shown in the following time-table for liberalization: Brussels Planned No. Description of commodity liberalization date ex 17.04 Liquorice confectionery except liquorice all sorts 1 July 1965 ex 17.04 Other sugar confectionery and liquorice all sorts 1 January 1966 ex 18.06 Chocolate 31 December 1966 ex 19.08 Biscuits, rusks 1 July 1966 ex 18.06 Other food preparations, also containing cocoa 31 December 1966 ex 21.07 ex 25.16 Granite in blocks and sheets 1 July 1965 35.05 ) Dextrins and dextrin glues; soluble or roasted 1 January 1966 ex 35.06 ) starches; starch glues and glues containing ) starch or starch products 40.10 Transmission, conveyor or elevator belts or belting 1 July 1965 of vulcanized rubber ex 40.11 Rubber tyres and tubes for bicycles without motor 1 July 1965 or with an auxiliary motor ex 46.03 Basketwork and other articles of plaiting materials 1 July 1966 ex 48.11 Wallpaper 1 July 1965 ex 64.01 ) Footwear with uppers of rubber, footwear on which 1 July 1966 ex 64.02 ) outer soles are vulcanized L/2336/Add.2 Page 2 Brussels Planned No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily Egyptian, July 23, 1966
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC July 1966 Daily Egyptian 1966 7-23-1966 The aiD ly Egyptian, July 23, 1966 Daily Egyptian Staff Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/de_July1966 Volume 47, Issue 188 Recommended Citation , . "The aiD ly Egyptian, July 23, 1966." (Jul 1966). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Daily Egyptian 1966 at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in July 1966 by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Edi0riou Page 4 SOU THER N LLINOIS UN IVER S ITY Volume 1.7 Ca,bondol., III. Solu,day July 23, 1966 Humb.r 188 Gov. Kerner to Bolster Area Touri~m * Plans for Massac Bus Ser~ice Told to Investors Gov. Dno Kerner announced May Cease in hi s address to the South­ ern illinOis Tourism lnvest­ T he summer bus service that was star t ed on a tempo­ mem Confe r e nce Friday that rary basis two weeks ago has he will seek $1 million in general revenue fund$ from been operating 31 a 90 per cent de fi cit, according (0 Bob the next Illinois Gene.u.l As ­ sembly for deveJopmem of Drinan, student body presi­ demo Fon Massac State Park near Metropolis . "We have onl y been getting The projecl, wh ich could about $2 per day from fares result i n the c r e ation of 800 and it is costi ng us $30 a day job opportunities, will be pan to run (he service," Drinan of the drive to develop the said.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 1572 - Benjamine C
    Appeal No. 1572 - Benjamine C. Bengert v. US - 26 July, 1966. ________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT NO. Z-865552 Issued to: Benjamine C. Bengert DECISION OF THE COMMANDANT UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 1572 Benjamine C. Bengert This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 137.30-1. By order dated 21 April 1966, an Examiner of the United States Coast Guard at Houston, Texas, suspended Appellant's seaman's documents for 2 months outright plus 4 months on 12 months' probation upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The specifications found proved allege that while serving as a wiper on board the United States SS DEL MUNDO under authority of the document above described, Appellant, on nine different dates between 9 March and 29 March 1961, sometimes at sea and sometimes in port, wrongfully failed to perform his duties. On three of these dates, one time at sea, it is alleged that the failure was due to intoxication. At the hearing, Appellant elected to act as his own counsel. appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge and each specification. The Investigating Officer introduced no evidence. file:////hqsms-lawdb/users/KnowledgeManagement...&%20R%201479%20-%201679/1572%20-%20BENGERT.htm (1 of 3) [02/10/2011 10:56:08 AM] Appeal No. 1572 - Benjamine C. Bengert v. US - 26 July, 1966. Appellant pointed out that on certain of the dates he had worked part of the day. At the end of the hearing, the Examiner rendered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge and specification had been proved by plea.
    [Show full text]
  • WPR RC017 14 Finrep 1966
    ," ... ., .". ~ .,. --' -.. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REGIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC SEVENTEENTH SESSION Jr. Manila, 22-27 September 1966 ~ " '. I ( • REPORT OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE PLENARY SESSIONS .J . MANILA November 1966 , I, I WOlW) HEALTH ORG.A.NIZATION REGIONAL COMMI'l'TEE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC SEVENTEENTH SESSION Mon1Ja, 2l. to 27 September 1966 • REPORr <F THE RmIONAL CO*IT'l'EE MINtJrEB OF THE PLENARY SESSIOO'S w.NIIA November 1966 --.- , /! --- The seventeenth session a£ the Begional Colllllittee tor the Western Pacific was held in the WHO Conference HaJ.l, f'rom 2J. to Z7 September 1966, under the chairmanship of Dr Thor Peng Thong (cambodia), with Dr S. R. Sayampanathan (Singapore), as Vice-Chairman. Dr J. C. Thieme (Western Samoa) and Dr Koukeo Sa.ycocie (laos) were the Rapporteurs. The Regional Committee met on 2J., 22 and 2"( September. Teclmica.1 discussions were held on 23, 24 and 26 September. The Report of' the Colllllittee will be f'ound in Part I at this document on pages 1-76, the minutes of' the plenary sessiOns in Part II on pages 8,3-216. The Sub-Committee on Progr8.llllle and Budget met on 23 and 26 •• September. The report of' the Sub-Colllllittee will be f'ound on pages 31-56. -. -11- • PARr I REPORT OF THE REGIONAL Ca.t«'l"l!EE CONTENTS nlTRODUCTION .................................................. ~ • • • .. • .. 1 -.' I ANNUAL REPORT OF THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ON THE WORK FROM 1 JULY 1965 TO 30 JUNE 1966 .................... 2 II PROPOSED PROGRAMME AND BUDGET FOR 1968 ............................... 6 III O'.I'HER ~ DISCUSSEI) ...........................................
    [Show full text]