THE SARMATIAN REVIEW Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gli Autori Di Questo Numero
pl.it | rassegna italiana di argomenti polacchi | 11 | 2020 ISSN: 2384-9266 | plitonline.it Gli autori di questo numero Alessandro Amenta is an assistant professor of Polish language at the University of Rome “Tor Vergata”. His research interests include translation stud- ies, Polish interwar and post-1989 literature, and gender and queer studies in Eastern Europe. He has translated many 20th century Polish writers into Italian, such as Witold Gombrowicz, Adam Zagajewski, Wiesław Myśliwski, Zuzanna Ginczanka, Andrzej Stasiuk, Eugeniusz Tkaczyszyn-Dycki, Antoni Libera, Izabela Filipiak, Łukasz Jarosz, and Piotr Paziński. He is the author of two monographs: Il Discorso dell’Altro. La costruzione delle identità omosessuali nella narrativa polacca del Novecento (2008) and Le parole e il silenzio. La poesia di Zuzanna Ginczanka e Krystyna Krahelska (2016). Lidia Mafrica graduated in 2015 from the University of Udine, where she specialised in Polish language and literature. In her master’s dissertation, she discussed the analysis and Italian translation of Fotoplastikon by Jacek Dehnel. Currently she is a temporary research fellow at University of Genoa and edito- rial assistant for “pl.it / rassegna italiana di argomenti polacchi”. Dario Prola is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Applied Linguistics of Warsaw University. He teaches the history of Italian literature, literary translation, and specialised translation. He received a PhD in 2008 from Turin University, with a thesis on the theme of myth and representation of the city in Polish literature after 1989. His research interests include contemporary Polish literature, literary translation, and literary relationships between Italy and Poland. He is the author of numerous articles and two monographs: Mito e rappresentazione della città nella letteratura polacca (2014) and Spossato dalla bellezza: l’Italia nella scrittura di Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (2018). -
CV, Full Format
BENJAMIN PALOFF (1/15/2013) Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures 507 Bruce Street University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Ann Arbor, MI 48103 3040 MLB, 812 E. Washington (617) 953-2650 Ann Arbor, MI 48109 [email protected] EDUCATION Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Ph.D. in Slavic Languages and Literatures, June 2007. M.A. in Slavic Languages and Literatures, November 2002. Dissertation: Intermediacy: A Poetics of Unfreedom in Interwar Russian, Polish, and Czech Literatures, a comparative treatment of metaphysics in Eastern European Modernism, 1918-1945. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan M.F.A. in Creative Writing/Poetry, April 2001. Thesis: Typeface, a manuscript of poems. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts B.A., magna cum laude with highest honors in field, Slavic Languages and Literatures, June 1999. Honors thesis: Divergent Narratives: Affinity and Difference in the Poetry of Zbigniew Herbert and Miroslav Holub, a comparative study. TEACHING Assistant Professor, Departments of Slavic Languages and Literatures and of Comparative Literature, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2007-Present). Courses in Polish and comparative Slavic literatures, critical theory, and translation. Doctoral Dissertation Committees in Slavic Languages and Literatures: Jessica Zychowicz (Present), Jodi Grieg (Present), Jamie Parsons (Present). Doctoral Dissertation Committees in Comparative Literature: Sylwia Ejmont (2008), Corine Tachtiris (2011), Spencer Hawkins (Present), Olga Greco (Present). Doctoral Dissertation Committees in other units: Ksenya Gurshtein (History of Art, 2011). MFA Thesis Committee in English/Creative Writing: Francine Harris (2011). Faculty Associate, Frankel Center for Jewish Studies (2009-Present); Center for Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies (2007-Present). Service: Steering Committee, Copernicus Endowment for Polish Studies (2007-Present). -
Kremlin Narratives for Subversive Activity in Lithuania‘S Information Space
Steeples of Church of Saint Anne and cityscape in the Old city of Vilnius, Lithuania (Shutterstock) Kremlin narratives for subversive activity in Lithuania‘s information space Integrity Initiative https://medium.com/@hitthehybrid/kremlin-narratives-for-subversive-activity-in-lithuania-s-information-space-bd2b93b2cde8 Dalia Bankauskaitė is an Adjunct Fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) in Washington. She has extensive professional experience in strategic and integrated communication in public (central and local) and private sectors of Lithuania, Balkans, Ukraine and Georgia. She served as a political counsellor at the Lithuanian Embassy in Moscow and served as an advisor to the European Affairs Committee at the Lithuanian parliament. Here she looks at how the Kremlin uses disinformation specific to Lithuania to support its over- arching propaganda narratives: Kremlin public diplomacy experts in Russia state, and experience confirms, that Russia does not seek to be loved by the West, but does intend to pursue its own interests there. Following this reasoning, the Kremlin is not interested in building a positive image of Russia in Lithuanian society or in winning the hearts and minds of the Lithuanian public. Neither does the Kremlin aim to utterly destroy Lithuania (or the West): it aims to contain and restrain it through ‘divide and rule’ tactics. The Kremlin seeks to change the choices Lithuania makes by gaining influence over its society and its political decisions. The Kremlin’s information warfare is meant to increase confusion and division in Lithuanian society, undermine trust in the government, erode public support for liberal democratic values so as to increase its own relative power, and create tensions within the Euro-Atlantic alliance. -
Gombrowicz and Woolf: the Face As Culture
chapter 3 Gombrowicz and Woolf: The Face as Culture Introduction Championed by Baudelaire, the face in which the importance of ‘depth’ is eclipsed by the spectacle of surface inaugurates a new era in portraiture. Authors active in the 1920s, 1930s, and later tend to produce portraits which circumvent the principles of phrenology and physiognomics without explicit reference to those ‘sciences’. In this period, theories of ‘reading’ the face as instruments of characterisation are used less frequently. Writers tend to chal- lenge the traditional role of the face as an instrument of characterisation directly. Thus, the face is no longer simply a passage to the soul. This ‘meaning- less’ type of portraiture (to borrow Edmund Heier’s phrase), which not only complicates physiognomic characterisation but often completely destroys it, will be the focus of this chapter (1976, 324). I will examine portraits in the works of two authors considered to be paradigmatic of modernist style, the English writer Virginia Woolf (1882–1941) and the Polish author Witold Gombrowicz (1904–69).1 One reason why twentieth-century portraiture received little critical atten- tion is that modernist accounts of faces have not been considered as portraits at all. Heier suggests that ‘modernist’ faces are often reduced to “mere signals” and “meagre suggestions” which compel the reader to “felicitous accidental com- pletion” (1976, 323). To be a literary portrait, a description must fulfil two con- ditions: it must “draw forth” the character (as French pourtraire would sugg est); 1 Witold Gombrowicz, a Polish author of plays, novels, short stories and other non-fictional texts, is recognised as a representative of Polish literary modernism. -
Criticism Leveled at Lithuanian Government and Society at Vilnius Holocaust Conference
Press release This project has been funded with support from European Commission Under Strand 1 – European Remembrance of Europe for Citizens programme Criticism Leveled at Lithuanian Government and Society at Vilnius Holocaust Conference VILNIUS, April 20, 2015 A conference on Holocaust education was held at the Vilnius city hall on April 17, 2015. This conference was the final event in the "Being a Jew" project's series of events this year marking Holocaust Remembrance Day. The day before the "Star of Remembrance" event to commemorate Holocaust victims with 700 students participating from 15 Vilnius schools took place outside the Town Hall in Vilnius and at Ponar mass massacre site outside Vilnius. The conference included participants from the United States, Poland, Romania and Israel, including recognized and esteemed Holocaust historians and Holocaust education specialists, among them Tomas Venclova, Saulius Sužiedėlis, Dovid Katz, Šarūnas Liekis and a prerecorded address given by Efraim Zuroff. Representative of the European Commission's European Remembrance program Pavel Tychtl, Lithuanian Jewish Community chair Faina Kukliansky, Vilnius mayor Artūras Zuokas and Holocaust education experts from Poland and Lithuania spoke as well. No official representatives of the Lithuanian Parliament or Government attended. The writer Tomas Venclova, author of the controversial article "Jews and Lithuanians" back in 1975, spoke about what has and what has not changed over the intervening 40 years. "Officially it is agreed that the Holocaust is a great evil, a special day is allocated for remembering it, but at the same time there is the official attempt to justify and even canonize people who were complicit in the Holocaust. -
(Ne)Laisvės Refleksija. Witold Gombrowicz Ir Alfonsas Nyka-Niliūnas
VYTAUTO DIDŢIOJO UNIVERSITETAS HUMANITARINIŲ MOKSLŲ FAKULTETAS ISTORIJOS KATEDRA REFERATAS Dienoraštinė tremties ir išsivadavimo iš jos (ne)laisvės refleksija. Witold Gombrowicz ir Alfonsas Nyka-Niliūnas Studentė: Laima Venclauskienė, Mg I kursas Dėstytojas: prof. Egidijus Aleksandravičius KAUNAS, 2009 Turinys Įvadas ......................................................................................................................... 2 Tremtis ir emigracija: būties ir distancijos kategorijos ........................................... 6 Lietuvos ir Lenkijos paveikslai – prarastasis rojus ir jo (ne)laisvė ......................... 9 Apibendrinimas ....................................................................................................... 12 Naudota literatūra ................................................................................................... 13 1 Įvadas Ar įmanoma atskirti intelektualinę teritoriją nuo individo pojūtinių išgyvenimų istorijos, jo gyvenimą rikiuojančių būtinybių ir atsitiktinumų? Anot Algirdo Juliaus Greimo, intelektualinė biografija – tai savo paties gyvenimo logiška rekonstrukcija, mentalinių įvykių atranka, organizuota į vienprasmį procesą ir mąstymo reiškinius siejantį algoritmą1. Vytauto Kavolio puoselėjamas projektas intelektualinių biografijų metodu įgalinti vienos kurios kultūros – lietuviškosios, pavyzdţiui,- vieno kultūrinio klodo ar epochos aprašymą yra suprantamas, priimtinas ir pagirtinas, anot A. J. Greimo2. V. Kavolio tiriama simbolinė konstrukcija, savęs ir pasaulio suvokimas -
Presence of Julian Tuwim in Lithuania
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS LODZIENSIS FOLIA LITTERARIA POLONICA 6(36) 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1505-9057.36.11 Teresa Dalecka* The (Non)Presence of Julian Tuwim in Lithuania The relatively poor reception of Julian Tuwim’s works in Lithuania stems from the 1960s. In that period, unofficial literature circulated the country, influ- encing society as a form of cultural resistance, sole means to preserve national identity. Literary works became synonymous with defending culture and society. One of the dominating directions of the development of Lithuanian literature was reconstructing bonds with the pre-war national-agricultural vision of the world and historical memory. The second direction was, often through translations, re- constructing Western modernistic trends1. Lithuanian writers were searching for various forms of modified avant-garde trends in Western poets, Julian Tuwim among them. Having reclaimed independence in 1991, Lithuanian literature became simi- lar to Western literature. A lot of new opportunities opened up. Among the most interesting ones, there were phenomena like: unstable identity of the subject, pop- ularity of grotesque, disappearance of lyricism in poetry, intertextuality, domi- nance of essay in prose, and stylistic experiments including merging highbrow and mass literature2. Contemporary Lithuanian writers reflect various outlooks and philosophies in their works. Young authors feel less overwhelmed by tradi- tion than their predecessors. At the same time, the reasons to rebel against literary canons are diminishing: Currently, the most important issue is the audience of literature and the ques- tion of the place for subjective works in a chaotic world of commercialised soci- ety, ruled by market competitiveness, along with modernised communication3. -
Witold Gombrowicz Ferdydurke (1937)
Autor opracowania: prof. dr hab. Marek Bernacki, ATH w Bielsku-Białej Opracowania ukazały się drukiem w 2002 roku w warszawskim Wydawnictwie ADAMANTAN w serii "Przeczytaj Przed Maturą". Witold Gombrowicz Ferdydurke1 (1937/1938) Biogram autora Witold Gombrowicz (1904–1969) – prozaik, dramaturg, uważany powszechnie za jednego z najwybitniejszych pisarzy XX wieku. Urodził się w Małoszycach pod Opatowem w rodzinie ziemiańskiej; studiował prawo na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim. Po krótkim pobycie za granicą (we Francji) powrócił do Polski, gdzie odbył praktykę sądową. W latach 30. poświęcił się wyłącznie twórczości literackiej. Był częstym gościem stołecznej kawiarni „Ziemiańska”, gdzie miał swój stolik oraz liczne grono wielbicieli, młodych początkujących pisarzy. Na początku sierpnia 1939 r. wybrał się w podróż morską do Ameryki Południowej na pokładzie „Chrobrego”. Kiedy wybuchła wojna, znajdował się w Argentynie, gdzie postanowił pozostać. Odtąd żył i tworzył na emigracji, najpierw w Argentynie (gdzie w latach 1947–1953 pracował jako urzędnik w Banku Polskim w Buenos Aires), a pod koniec życia we Francji. Przez wiele lat Witold Gombrowicz współpracował z paryską „Kulturą” Jerzego Giedroycia, na łamach której drukował niemal wszystkie swoje utwory oraz publikował Dziennik (wydany później osobno w trzech tomach) – jeden z najdoskonalszych przykładów XX-wiecznej literatury autobiograficznej, pełniący jednocześnie rolę autorskiego komentarza do własnej twórczości oraz dzieł innych pisarzy, zarówno polskich, jak i zagranicznych. W 1963 r. pisarz opuścił Argentynę i wyjechał na rok do Berlina Zachodniego jako stypendysta fundacji Forda. Potem wyjechał do Francji. Towarzyszką ostatnich lat życia Gombrowicza była jego żona Rita Gombrowicz (Francuzka pochodząca z Kanady). Witold Gombrowicz zmarł w Vence, we Francji, tam też został pochowany. Nigdy nie wrócił do Polski, jednak jego twórczość była w kraju dobrze znana, komentowana i podziwiana przede wszystkim jako manifest wolności i niezależności wolnej oraz twórczej jednostki. -
Jurgis Saulys Papers Ms
Jurgis Saulys papers Ms. Coll. 1243 Finding aid prepared by Rayna Andrews. Last updated on April 27, 2020. University of Pennsylvania, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts 2017 January 18 Jurgis Saulys papers Table of Contents Summary Information...................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History.........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents.......................................................................................................................................4 Administrative Information...........................................................................................................................5 Related Materials ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory..................................................................................................................................... 8 Political and literary files........................................................................................................................ 8 Correspondence.....................................................................................................................................12 -
The Post-Traumatic Theatre of Grotowski and Kantor Advance Reviews
The Post-traumatic Theatre of Grotowski and Kantor Advance Reviews “A brilliant cross-disciplinary comparative analysis that joins a new path in theatre studies, revitalizing the artistic heritage of two great twentieth-century masters: Tadeusz Kantor and Jerzy Grotowski.” —Professor Antonio Attisani, Department of Humanities, University of Turin “Among the landmarks of postwar avant-garde theatre, two Polish works stand out: Grotowski’s Akropolis and Kantor’s Dead Class. Magda Romanska scrupulously corrects misconceptions about these crucial works, bringing to light linguistic elements ignored by Anglophone critics and an intense engagement with the Holocaust very often overlooked by their Polish counterparts. This is vital and magnificently researched theatre scholarship, at once alert to history and to formal experiment. Romanska makes two pieces readers may think they know newly and urgently legible.” —Martin Harries, author of “Forgetting Lot’s Wife: On Destructive Spectatorship,” University of California, Irvine “As someone who teaches and researches in the areas of Polish film and theatre – and European theatre/theatre practice/translation more broadly – I was riveted by the book. I couldn’t put it down. There is no such extensive comparative study of the work of the two practitioners that offers a sustained and convincing argument for this. The book is ‘leading edge.’ Romanska has the linguistic and critical skills to develop the arguments in question and the political contexts are in general traced at an extremely sophisticated level. This is what lends the writing its dynamism.” —Dr Teresa Murjas, Director of Postgraduate Research, Department of Film, Theatre and Television, University of Reading “This is a lucidly and even beautifully written book that convincingly argues for a historically and culturally contextualized understanding of Grotowski’s and Kantor’s performances. -
Witold Gombrowicz and Virgilio Piñera, the Argentine Experience
Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego Peer Reviewed Title: Witold Gombrowicz and Virgilio Piñera, the Argentine Experience Author: Žilinskaitė, Milda Acceptance Date: 2014 Series: UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Degree: Ph. D., LiteratureUC San Diego Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9n14r0b5 Local Identifier: b8163821 Abstract: This dissertation is a comparative study of lives and works of two émigré writers : the Polish Witold Gombrowicz (1904-1969) and Cuban Virgilio Piñera (1912-1979). The two met in 1946 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, where they developed a lifelong friendship grounded in intellectual compatibility and fueled by literary collaboration. My study focuses mainly on the body of work that the two authors produced during the twenty- three-year span of time between their initial meeting and the death of Gombrowicz. I argue that the writers shared a strong desire to renovate the world of literature in their home countries, including their host culture, Argentina. This desire in turn allowed them to develop in their writings a unique mode of cultural criticism which sought to build a bridge between the literary worlds of two geographically distant and, at least at first sight, culturally remote regions: Latin America and East-Central Europe. There are five chapters that comprise this dissertation. The introductory chapter conceptualizes the theoretical framework for analyzing Gombrowicz and Piñera's works in relation to their historical and biographical contexts. Chapter One focuses specifically on the year 1947 and the writers' collaboration on six critical texts which target the most prominent Argentine literary and intellectual figures of the time. The subsequent two chapters examine the novels La carne de René by Piñera and Trans-Atlantyk by Gombrowicz, both written in the early 1950s, when the exchange of ideas between the two writers was still at its peak. -
Por El Camino De Gombrowicz: Apuntes Para La Interpretación De Pornografia
Por el camino de Gombrowicz: apuntes para la interpretación de Pornografia Natalia KHARITONOVA Universidad Estatal Rusa de Humanidades (Moscú) [email protected] Recibido:Octubre de 2005 Aceptado: Febrero de 2006 Resumen El artículo plantea un estudio comparado de la figura del narrador en las novelas Pornografia de Witold Gombrowicz, y La nausée de Jean-Paul Sartre. El presente análisis resulta posible gracias al manifestado interés del escritor polaco hacia la “mirada del Otto, que es igualmente un aspecto fundamental en la obra filosófica de Sartre. El estudio muestra que a pesar de un trasfondo filosófico común, cada uno de los auto- res se centra en una serie de problemas propios, y esa diferencia determina que el universo narrado de cada un~ de las novelas se rige por las leyes distintas.. Palabras clave: Gombrowicz; Sartre; Pornografia; Literatura polaca; siglo XX;narrador. Abstract Qn the Gombrowicz’s way: notesfor mnterpretat¿on of “Pornografia” Th article offers a study of the narrator in the novels Pornografia, by Witold Gombrowicz, and La nausée, by Jean-Paul Sartre. It is poasible to make this kind ofanalysis thanks to the proved interest ofthe Polishwri- ter in such concept as the “Other’s look’, also fundamental for the Sartre’s philosophic works. The article shows that in spite of the common existentialist ground each writer concentrates on some individual pro- blerns, and this difference determines the principIes according to which the narrated umverse of each novel is ¡uled. Kev words: Gombrowicz; Sartre; Pornografia; Polish literature; XX century; narrator. SUMARIO 1. Temáticade las novelas Pornografia y La nausée: la coiporeidad y la creación, la mirada del Otto y el sentido de la existencia; 2.