DOCSLIB.ORG

Amaranthaceae Juss.) Do Estado Da Bahia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amaranthaceae Juss.) Do Estado Da Bahia Luisa Ramos Senna AMARANTHOIDEAE E GOMPHRENOIDEAE (AMARANTHACEAE JUSS.) DO ESTADO DA BAHIA Feira de Santana – Bahia 2006 ÍNDICE DE FIGURAS Figura 1. Achyranthes aspera L. .......................................................................... 24 Figura 2. Mapa de distribuição de Achyranthes aspera L. no estado da Bahia ....25 Figura 3. Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze e A. dendrotricha C.C. Tonwns. ...30 Figura 4. Mapa de distribuição de Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze e A. dendrotricha C.C. Tonwns. no estado da Bahia ....................................................31 Figura 5. Alternanthera dentata (Moench) Scheygr. e A. littoralis var. littoralis var. maritima (Mart.) Pedersen ....................................................................................34 Figura 6. Mapa de distribuição de Alternanthera dentata (Moench) Scheygr. e A. maritima (Mart.) A.St-Hil no estado da Bahia ........................................................35 Figura 7. Alternanthera martii (Moq.) R.E. Fr., A. multicaulis Kuntze e A. paronychioides A.St.-Hil. ......................................................................................38 Figura 8. Mapa de distribuição de Alternanthera martii (Moq.) R.E. Fr., A. multicaulis Kuntze e A. paronychioides A.St.-Hil. no estado da Bahia ..................39 Figura 9. Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. e A. pungens Kunth ..........42 Figura 10. Mapa de distribuição de Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. e A. pungens Kunth no estado da Bahia ..................................................................43 Figura 11. Alternanthera ramosissima (Mart.) Chodat e A. rufa (Mart.) D.Dietr. ................................................................................................................................47 Figura 12. Mapa de distribuição de Alternanthera ramosissima (Mart.) Chodat no estado da Bahia .....................................................................................................48 Figura 13. Mapa de distribuição de A. rufa (Mart.) D.Dietr. no estado da Bahia ................................................................................................................................50 Figura 14. Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. e A. tenella Colla …..........................52 Figura 15. Mapa de distribuição de Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. e A. tenella Colla no estado da Bahia …................................…………………………………...53 Figura 16. Amaranthus lividus L., A. spinosus L. e A. viridis L. ...........................57 i Figura 17. Mapa de distribuição das espécies de Amaranthus L. no estado da Bahia ......................................................................................................................58 Figura 18. Blutaparon portulacoides (A.St.-Hil.) Mears e B. vermiculare (L.) Mears …….........................................................................................................................62 Figura 19. Mapa de distribuição das espécies de Blutaparon Raf. no estado da Bahia ......................................................................................................................63 Figura 20. Celosia corymbifera Didr., C. argentea L. e C. grandifolia Moq............67 Figura 21. Mapa de distribuição das espécies de Celosia L. no estado da Bahia ................................................................................................................................68 Figura 22. Alternanthera maritima (Mart.) A.St.-Hil., A. multicaulis Kuntze, A. ramosissima (Mart.) Chodat, A. tenella Colla, Blutaparon portulacoides (A.St.-Hil.) Mears e Celosia argentea L. var. argentea ............................................................71 Figura 23. Chamissoa acuminata Mart. var. acuminata, C. acuminata var. swansonii Sohmer e C. altissima (Jacq.) Kunth var. altissima ..............................75 Figura 24. Mapa de distribuição das variedades de Chamissoa acuminata Mart. no estado da Bahia .....................................................................................................76 Figura 25. Mapa de distribuição das variedades de Chamissoa altissima (Jacq.) Kunth no estado da Bahia ......................................................................................77 Figura 26. Cyathula achyranthoides Moq. e C. prostrata Blume ..........................80 Figura 27. Mapa de distribuição de Cyathula achyranthoides Moq. e C. prostrata Blume no estado da Bahia .....................................................................................81 Figura 28. Froelichia humboldtiana (Roem. & Schult.) Seub. ...............................83 Figura 29. Mapa de distribuição de Froelichia humboldtiana (Roem. & Schult.) Seub. no estado da Bahia .....................................................................................84 Figura 30. Gomphrena agrestis Mart., G. angustiflora Mart. e G. aphylla Pohl ex Moq. .......................................................................................................................91 Figura 31. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena agrestis Mart. no estado da Bahia ................................................................................................................................92 ii Figura 32. Mapa de distribuição de G. angustiflora Mart. e G. aphylla Pohl ex Moq. no estado da Bahia ................................................................................................93 Figura 33. Gomphrena arborescens L.f., G. celosioides Mart. .............................95 Figura 34. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena arborescens L.f., G. celosioides Mart. no estado da Bahia .......................................................................................96 Figura 35. Gomphrena chrestoides C.C. Towns. e G. claussenii Moq. ................98 Figura 36. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena chrestoides C.C. Towns. e G. claussenii Moq. no estado da Bahia ......................................................................99 Figura 37. Gomphrena debilis Mart. e G. demissa Mart. ....................................102 Figura 38. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena debilis Mart. e G. demissa Mart. no estado da Bahia ..............................................................................................103 Figura 39. Gomphrena desertorum Mart. e G. duriuscula Moq. .........................106 Figura 40. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena desertorum Mart. e G. duriuscula Moq. no estado da Bahia .....................................................................................107 Figura 41. Gomphrena elegans Mart. e G. gardineri Moq. .................................110 Figura 42. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena elegans Mart. e G. gardineri Moq. no estado da Bahia ..............................................................................................111 Figura 43. Gomphrena globosa L. e G. hatschbachiana Pedersen ....................113 Figura 44. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena globosa L. e G. hatschbachiana Pedersen no estado da Bahia ..............................................................................114 Figura 45. Gomphrena mollis Mart., G. nigricans Mart. e G. prostrata Mart. ..............................................................................................................................120 Figura 46. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena mollis Mart., G. nigricans Mart. e G. prostrata Mart. no estado da Bahia .................................................................121 Figura 47. Gomphrena microcephala Moq. e G. rupestris Nees. ........................123 Figura 48. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena microcephala Moq., G. rupestris Nees. e G. serturneroides Suess. no estado da Bahia ........................................125 iii Figura 49. Gomphrena scapigera Mart., G. vaga Mart. e G. virgata Mart. ..........129 Figura 50. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena scapigera Mart. e G. virgata Mart. no estado da Bahia ..............................................................................................130 Figura 51. Mapa de distribuição de Gomphrena vaga Mart. no estado da Bahia ..............................................................................................................................131 Figura 52. Hebanthe paniculata Mart., Herbstia brasiliana (Moq.) Sohmer e Iresine diffusa Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. .........................................................................134 Figura 53. Mapa de distribuição de Hebanthe paniculata Mart., Herbstia brasiliana (Moq.) Sohmer e Iresine diffusa Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. no estado da Bahia ..............................................................................................................................135 Figura 54. Pfaffia acutifolia (Moq.) Stützer e P. fruticulosa Suess. .....................140 Figura 55. Mapa de distribuição de Pfaffia acutifolia (Moq.) Stützer e P. fruticulosa Suess. no estado da Bahia ..................................................................................141 Figura 56. Pfaffia glabrata Mart. e P. helichrysoides (Moq.) Kuntze ..................144 Figura 57. Mapa de distribuição de Pfaffia glabrata Mart. e P. helichrysoides (Moq.) Kuntze no estado da Bahia ......................................................................145 Figura 58. Pfaffia iresinoides Kuntze e P. jubata Mart. .......................................146 Figura 59. Mapa de distribuição de Pfaffia iresinoides Kuntze e P. jubata Mart. no estado da Bahia ...................................................................................................147
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Underutilization Versus Nutritional-Nutraceutical Potential of the Amaranthus Food Plant: a Mini-Review
    applied sciences Review Underutilization Versus Nutritional-Nutraceutical Potential of the Amaranthus Food Plant: A Mini-Review Olusanya N. Ruth 1,*, Kolanisi Unathi 1,2, Ngobese Nomali 3 and Mayashree Chinsamy 4 1 Disipline of Food Security, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Science University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Department of Consumer Science, University of Zululand, 24 Main Road, KwaDlangezwa, Uthungulu 3886, South Africa 3 Department of Botany and Plant Biotectechnology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa; [email protected] 4 DST-NRF-Center, Indiginous Knowledge System, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville 3629, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Amaranthus is a C4 plant tolerant to drought, and plant diseases and a suitable option for climate change. This plant could form part of every region’s cultural heritage and can be transferred to the next generation. Moreover, Amaranthus is a multipurpose plant that has been identified as a traditional edible vegetable endowed with nutritional value, besides its fodder, medicinal, nutraceutical, industrial, and ornamental potentials. In recent decade Amaranthus has received increased research interest. Despite its endowment, there is a dearth of awareness of its numerous potential benefits hence, it is being underutilized. Suitable cultivation systems, innovative Citation: Ruth, O.N.; Unathi, K.; processing, and value-adding techniques to promote its utilization are scarce. However, a food-based Nomali, N.; Chinsamy, M. approach has been suggested as a sustainable measure that tackles food-related problem, especially Underutilization Versus in harsh weather. Thus, in this review, a literature search for updated progress and potential Nutritional-Nutraceutical Potential of uses of Amaranthus from online databases of peer-reviewed articles and books was conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Problemas De Conservação Das Espécies Dos Gêneros Froelichia Moench E Froelichiella R.E
    Acta bot. bras. 19(2): 215-219. 2005 Problemas de conservação das espécies dos gêneros Froelichia Moench e Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) no Brasil Maria Salete Marchioretto1,4, Paulo Günter Windisch2 e Josafá Carlos de Siqueira3 Recebido em 22/06/2004. Aceito em 25/08/2004 RESUMO – (Problemas de conservação das espécies dos gêneros Froelichia Moench e Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) no Brasil). O estado de conservação dos representantes dos gêneros Froelichia Moench e Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) no Brasil é discutido, baseado nos critérios da União Internacional para a Conservação da Natureza (IUCN). A maioria das espécies pode ser considerada como vulnerável, mas também podem apresentar problemas de conservação mais sérios em base regional, enquanto outras espécies podem ser consideradas como: provavelmente extinta (EX), criticamente em perigo (CR) ou em perigo (PE) ao menos em extensas porções das suas áreas de distribuição original. Palavras-chave: Amaranthaceae, conservação, preservação, biodiversidade, espécies ameaçadas ABSTRACT – (Problems of conservation of the species of the genera Froleichia Moench and Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) in Brazil). The state of conservation of the representatives of the genera Froleichia Moench and Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) in Brazil is discussed based in the criteria of International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resourses (IUCN). Most of the species can be considered as vulnerable, but may also present more serious problems on a regional basis, while some species should be considered as probably extint (EX), criticaly endangered (CR) or endangered (PE) at least in large part of their original distribution range. Key words: Amaranthaceae, conservation, preservation, biodiversity, treatened species Introdução ameaçada, e promover a sua conservação (Mendonça & Lins 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES L RESEARCH ARTICLE
    SPECIES l RESEARCH ARTICLE Species Sexual systems, pollination 22(69), 2021 modes and fruiting ecology of three common herbaceous weeds, Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. Ex Schult., Allmania nodiflora (L.) To Cite: Solomon Raju AJ, Mohini Rani S, Lakshminarayana G, R.Br. and Pupalia lappacea (L.) Venkata Ramana K. Sexual systems, pollination modes and fruiting ecology of three common herbaceous weeds, Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. Ex Schult., Allmania nodiflora (L.) R.Br. and Juss. (Family Amaranthaceae: Pupalia lappacea (L.) Juss. (Family Amaranthaceae: Sub-family Amaranthoideae). Species, 2021, 22(69), 43-55 Sub-family Amaranthoideae) Author Affiliation: 1,2Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Solomon Raju AJ1, Mohini Rani S2, Lakshminarayana 3Department of Environmental Sciences, Gayathri Vidya Parishad College for Degree & P.G. Courses (Autonomous), G3, Venkata Ramana K4 M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam 530 017, India 4Department of Botany, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India ABSTRACT Correspondent author: A.J. Solomon Raju, Mobile: 91-9866256682 Aerva lanata and Pupalia lappacea are perennial herbs while Allmania nodiflora is an Email:[email protected] annual herb. A. lanata is dioecious with bisexual and female plants while P. lappacea and A. nodiflora are hermaphroditic. In P. lappacea, the flowers are borne as triads Peer-Review History with one hermaphroditic fertile flower and two sterile flowers alternately along the Received: 25 December 2020 entire length of racemose inflorescence. A. lanata and A. nodiflora flowers are Reviewed & Revised: 26/December/2020 to 27/January/2021 nectariferous while P. lappacea flowers are nectarless. The hermaphroditic flowers of Accepted: 28 January 2021 Published: February 2021 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4: Pollen-Types in Amaranthaceae by Mittre (1963). Amaranthus-Type
    Table 4: Pollen-types in Amaranthaceae by Mittre (1963). Amaranthus-type Amaranthus- type sensu stricto Cyathula-type Celosia-type Pollen Faintly to moderately granulate Prominently granulate Baculariate morphological characters: Sexine pattern Total number of 5 2 2 genera studied Genera Amaranthus spinosus L., Cyathula prostrate (L.) Blume, Celosia argentea L., C. cristata L., A. viridis L., A. tricolor L., C. capitata Moq., Allmania albida (Willd.) R.Br. ex Hook.f., A. hybridus L., Deeringia celosioides R.Br. A. nodiflora (L.) R.Br. ex Wight. A. polygamous L., A. tenuifolius Willd., A. spinosus L., Achyranthes aspera L., A. bidentata Blume, Aerva lanata (L.) Juss., A. sanguinolenta (L.) Blume, A. tomentosa Forssk., A. javanica (Burm.f.) Juss. ex Schult., A. monsoniae (L. f.) Mart., Digera arvensis Forssk., Pupalia lappacea (L.) Juss., P. atropurpurea (Lam.) Moq. 22 Table 4: Continued. Gomphrena-type Gomphrena-type sensu stricto Alternanthera-type Not included in any group Pollen reticulate several meshes, without reticulate with few meshes, without reticulate with several meshes and spinulate morphological spinules spinules characters: Sexine pattern Total number of 1 1 1 genera studied Genera Gomphrena globosa L., Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R.Br. ex DC., Psilotrichum ferrugineum (Roxb.) Moq. G. celosioides Mart. A. repens J.F.Gmel. 2 3 Table 5: Pollen-types in Centrospermae by Nowicke (1975). Type I Type II Type III Pollen morphological 3- Colpate Pantoporate Pantocolpate characters: apertures Family studied Aizoaceae, Cactaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Amaranthaceae, Cactaceae, Basellaceae, Cactaceae, Molluginaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Molluginaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Phytolaccaceae, Portulacaceae Dysphaniaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Phytolaccaceae, Portulacaceae Phytolaccaceae, Portulacaceae Genera studied in 11 Amaranthaceae Species studied in Amaranthus spinosus L., Amaranthaceae Aerva leucura Moq., Allmania nodiflora (L.) R.Br.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Cattle, Fire and Wind in Rocky Savannas, Southeastern Brazil
    Acta Universitatis Carolinae Environmentalica 22 (2008): 111–130 Impacts of Cattle, Fire and Wind in Rocky Savannas, Southeastern Brazil JIŘÍ KOLBEK*, RUY JOSÉ VÁLKA ALVES** *Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic, [email protected] **Museu Nacional (UFRJ), Quinta da Boa Vista s. no., São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, [email protected] Accepted July 28, 2008 Abstract: The impacts of cattle (grazing, trampling and dung deposition), fire, and wind upon the rocky savannas (campo rupestre) of Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil, are briefly evaluated. Peculiar life forms of vascular plants and their adaptations to natural disturbances are analyzed. The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) is considered consistent with the findings for fire and wind. However, by altering the soil parameters, the presence of cattle brings about continuous and cyclic disturbances with long-lasting negative impacts on vegetation and on the survival of native species. The proportion of fire-adapted vascular plants species in campo rupestre was found to be comparable to those of the Brazilian zonal savannas on latossol (cerrado). Key words: campo rupestre, ecology, invasive species, management, white-sand savanna INTRODUCTION Brazilian rocky savannas (campo rupestre) are a phytogeographic province centered in the Espinhaço mountains in Bahia and Minas Gerais states (Fig. 1), between latitudes 10°–20°35’S and longitudes 40°10’–44°30’W (Giulietti et al. 2007). This extrazonal vegetation complex is inserted mainly within the humid savanna (cerrado) and semiarid savanna (caatinga) biomes (Alves et al. 2007), and typically has exceptionally nutrient-poor soils rich in Fe and Al (Benites et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus: Amaranthaceae) Katherine Waselkov Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Summer 8-12-2013 Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus: Amaranthaceae) Katherine Waselkov Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Waselkov, Katherine, "Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus: Amaranthaceae)" (2013). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 1162. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1162 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences Evolution, Ecology and Population Biology Dissertation Examination Committee: Kenneth M. Olsen, Chair James M. Cheverud Allan Larson Peter H. Raven Barbara A. Schaal Alan R. Templeton Population Genetics and Phylogenetic Context of Weed Evolution in the Genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) by Katherine Elinor Waselkov A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2013 St. Louis, Missouri © Copyright 2013 by Katherine Elinor Waselkov.
    [Show full text]
  • Amaranthaceae
    FLORA DE COLOMBIA MONOGRAFÍA NO. 23 AMARANTHACEAE CARLOS ALBERTO AGUDELO-H. Herbario HUQ, Universidad del Quindío, Armenia, Colombia. [email protected] Editores: JULIO BETANCUR GLORIA GALEANO JAIME AGUIRRE-C. INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA BOGOTÁ, D. C., COLOMBIA 2008 ©INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA APARTADO 7495, BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA ©CARLOS ALBERTO AGUDELO-H. EDITORES: Julio Betancur Gloria Galeano Jaime Aguirre-C. ASISTENTES EDITORIALES: Laura Clavijo Alejandro Zuluaga DIAGRAMACIÓN: Liliana P. Aguilar-G. IMPRESIÓN: ARFO Editores e Impresores Ltda. Cra 15 No. 54 - 32 [email protected] Bogotá, Colombia ISSN 0120-4351 CÍTESE COMO: Agudelo-H., C. A. Amaranthaceae. Flora de Colombia No. 23. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá D. C. Colombia. 138 p. Impreso en Colombia - Printed in Colombia, Bogotá, septiembre de 2008 Agudelo-H.: Amaranthaceae 3 DE LOS EDITORES DE FLORA DE COLOMBIA Nos complace entregar a la comunidad científica el número veintitrés de la Serie Flora de Colombia, el cual contiene el tratamiento de la familia Amaranthaceae para el país. La familia Amaranthaceae contiene cerca de 70 géneros y un millar de especies que se distribuyen por casi todo el planeta, exceptuando la región ártica, pero está más diversificada hacia las regiones tropicales. En América tropical está representada por 20 géneros y 300 especies aproximadamente, algunas de las cuales son introducidas y se comportan como malezas. Sin embargo, otras tantas especies se utilizan como plantas ornamentales o como fuente de medicamentos a nivel local. En este tratamiento para Colombia se presentan 14 géneros y 49 especies, por lo que esperamos que esta obra sea de gran utilidad para el conocimiento de esta importante familia en Colombia y los países vecinos, y que se convierta en una herramienta útil para la identificación y conocimiento de las especies.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Structure in the Brazilian Neotropical Savannah Species
    Chapter 16 Plant Structure in the Brazilian Neotropical Savannah Species Suzane Margaret Fank-de-Carvalho, Nádia Sílvia Somavilla, Maria Salete Marchioretto and Sônia Nair Báo Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59066 1. Introduction This chapter presents a review of some important literature linking plant structure with function and/or as response to the environment in Brazilian neotropical savannah species, exemplifying mostly with Amaranthaceae and Melastomataceae and emphasizing the environment potential role in the development of such a structure. Brazil is recognized as the 17th country in megadiversity of plants, with 17,630 endemic species among a total of 31,162 Angiosperms [1]. The focus in the Brazilian Cerrado Biome (Brazilian Neotropical Savannah) species is justified because this Biome is recognized as a World Priority Hotspot for Conservation, with more than 7,000 plant species and around 4,400 endemic plants [2-3]. The Brazilian Cerrado Biome is a tropical savannah-like ecosystem that occupies about 2 millions of km² (from 3-24° Latitude S and from 41-43° Longitude W), with a hot, semi-humid seasonal climate formed by a dry winter (from May to September) and a rainy summer (from October to April) [4-8]. Cerrado has a large variety of landscapes, from tall savannah woodland to low open grassland with no woody plants and wetlands, as palm swamps, supporting the richest flora among the world’s savannahs-more than 7,000 native species of vascular plants- with high degree of endemism [3, 6]. The “cerrado” word is used to the typical vegetation, with grasses, herbs and 30-40% of woody plants [9-10] where trees and bushes display contorted trunk and branches with thick and fire-resistant bark, shiny coriaceous leaves and are usually recovered with dense indumentum [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • AMARANTHACEAE)1 Maria Salete Marchioretto2,5, Silvia Teresinha Sfoggia Miotto3 & Josafá Carlos De Siqueira4
    PADRÕES DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO GEOGRÁFICA DAS ESPÉCIES BRASILEIRAS DE PFAFFIA (AMARANTHACEAE)1 Maria Salete Marchioretto2,5, Silvia Teresinha Sfoggia Miotto3 & Josafá Carlos de Siqueira4 RESUMO (Padrões de distribuição geográfica das espécies brasileiras de Pfaffia (Amaranthaceae)) O gênero Pfaffia Mart. é neotropical, sendo o Brasil considerado o centro de diversidade com 20 espécies, das quais 19 ocorrem na província biogeográfica do Cerrado. Suas espécies apresentam padrões de distribuição geográfica desde amplos até endêmicos. As províncias mais pobres em número de espécies foram a Amazônica e a Pampeana com três espécies em cada uma. O estado de Minas Gerais pode ser considerado o centro de diversidade e de endemismo do gênero, com espécies ocorrendo principalmente nos cerrados e campos rupestres. Palavras-chave: diversidade, padrões de distribuição, cerrado, Minas Gerais, campos rupestres. ABSTRACT (Patterns of geographic distribution of the Brazilian species of Pfaffia (Amaranthaceae)) The Brazil constitutes the main diversity center of the neotropical genus Pfaffia, with ca. 20 species, of which 19 occur in the “Cerrado” biogeographic province. Their species present distribution patterns ranging from wide to endemic. The poorest provinces in number of species are the “Amazônica” and “Pampeana” with three species each. The State of Minas Gerais can be considered the center of diversity and endemism with species occurring mainly in the savanna-like “cerrados” and rocky grasslands of the “campos rupestres”. Key words: diversity, distribution patterns, cerrado, Minas Gerais, campos rupestres. INTRODUÇÃO o neotrópico. Marchioretto (2008) confirma 20 Amaranthaceae Juss. é considerada uma espécies na revisão do gênero para o Brasil. família de distribuição tropical e subtropical, O Brasil é considerado o centro de diversidade sendo encontrada principalmente nas Américas do gênero (Siqueira 1994/1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Morphological Evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Alliance Donald B
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance Donald B. Pratt Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Pratt, Donald B., "Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 613. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/613 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Studies on Morphology and Anatomy of Selected Species of the Genus Amaranthus L
    Indian Journal of Plant Sciences ISSN: 2319–3824(Online) An Open Access, Online International Journal Available at http://www.cibtech.org/jps.htm 2017 Vol.6 (2) April-June, pp.99-105/Arya et al. Research Article COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF SELECTED SPECIES OF THE GENUS AMARANTHUS L. IN KERALA S. Arya, *T. Rajesh Kumar and R.Santhoshkumar Department of Botany, Mahatma Gandhi College (Kerala University) *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT The genus Amaranthus, a widely cultivated taxonomic group, consists about 60–70 species. Collectively known as Amaranth, it is a cosmopolitan genus of herbs belonging to the family Amaranthaceae. Most of amaranth species are summer annual weeds and are commonly referred to as pig weed. The floral and vegetative characters of the genus are complicated and hence it is refered as a difficult genus. The paper attempts to understand in deep the morphological and anatomical characters of selected five species of Amaranthus viz of A. caudatus, A. tricolor, A. viridis, A. blitum and A. hybridus. An indended key is prepared on the anatomy and morphological characters reporting the new unnoticed traits which would help in the easy identification of the species. It also puts light into the evolutionary relationship of these species with respect to the taxonomical and anatomical traits. Keywords: Amaranthus, Morphology, Anatomy, Key to the Species INTRODUCTION Under the traditional Bentham and Hooker system of classification (1862), the family Amaranthaceae comes under the series Curvembryae under the group Monochlamydae of Dicotyledons (Sambamurthy, 2010). Schinz, while dividing the family into two sub-families, viz. Amaranthoideae and Gomphrenoideae, included amaranths under the former group (Subfamily: Amaranthoideae; Tribe: Amarantheae (Vasishta, 1994).
    [Show full text]