Mapping the Terrain (Zygmunt Bauman's Postmodern Ethics)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mapping the Terrain (Zygmunt Bauman's Postmodern Ethics) DOCUMENT RESUME ED 453 133 SO 032 792 AUTHOR Biesta, Gert J. J.; Stams, Geert-Jan J. M. TITLE Towards a Postmodern Theory of Moral Education. Part II: Mapping the Terrain (Zygmunt Bauman's Postmodern Ethics). PUB DATE 2001-04-00 NOTE 33p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Seattle, WA, April 10-14, 2001). For "Towards a Postmodern Theory of Moral Education. Part I: Clearing the Terrain," see ED 443 345. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative (142)-- Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Criticism; *Ethical Instruction; Moral Development; *Moral Issues; *Philosophy; *Postmodernism; *Scholarship IDENTIFIERS Empirical Research; Moral Education; Poststructuralism; Theory Development ABSTRACT The project of which this paper is a part consists of three steps. The first step (an American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference 2000 paper subtitled "Clearing the Terrain") provided a critical overview of current debates on moral development and education, focusing on the relationship between empirical and theoretical research. The second step, including this paper, is meant to provide an overview of postmodern and poststructural approaches to ethics and morality. The third step will attempt to articulate a postmodern theory of moral education. This paper focuses on the ideas of Zygmunt Bauman and on his book "Postmodern Ethics." The paper explores Bauman's position to consider what his postmodern ethics is about and what it may have to offer the field of moral education. The major part of the paper consists of a systematic reconstruction of his ideas. It shows that one distinctive quality of Bauman's contribution to the overalldiscussion is that he connects (Levinasian) philosophy with a sociological analysis of modern society and its postmodern "moment." Although Bauman's work has a strong theoretical orientation, the combination of philosophy and sociology gives his writings a practical orientation that is helpful in thinking through the practical "implications" of his approach. The paper's conclusion focuses on what can be learned from Bauman's writings regarding four issues: (1) demarcation of the moral domain;(2) the gap between "is" and "ought," between facts and values;(3) moral motivation and moral action; and (4) moral relativism. Contains 21 references.(BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Towards a Postmodern Theoryof Moral Education Part II: Mapping theTerrain [Zygmunt Bauman's PostmodernEthics] A paper presented at the AnnualMeeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, Seattle, April 10-14, 2001. SIG: Moral Development and Education. Gert J.J. Biesta University of Exeter, England, UK Geert-Jan J.M. Stams PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY Leiden University, The Netherlands TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES N INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 Address for correspondence: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dr Gert J.J. Biesta Office of Educational Research and Improvement N EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION University of Exeter CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as School of Education received from the person or organization originating it. O Heavitree Road Minor changes have been made to Exeter improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this EX1 2LU document do not necessarily represent England, UK official OERI position or policy. e-mail: [email protected] BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 'Morality is not safe in the hands of reason..." Zygmunt Bauman (1993, p.247) INTRODUCTION Over the past decades educational scholarship has been significantlyinfluenced by postmodern and poststructural thought (see, for example, Cherryholmes, 1988; Lather, 1991;Giroux, et al. 1996; Stronach & MacLure, 1997; Peters, 1998). This influence is, however,still remarkably absent in the field of moral development and moral education (for two recent exceptions seeLourenco, 1996; Teo, 1997). This may well be the result of the rather widespreadconviction that postmodern and poststructural philosophy is unable to provide support for the moral and politicalproject that education is. Yet both philosophers and educational theorists have recently beenarguing -- and to our opinion they have done this in a convincing mannerthat postmodern and poststructural thought should not be understood as an expression of relativism and nihilism, but thatit is explicitly motivated by moral and political concerns (see, for example, Bauman, 1993; Critchley, 1992;1999a; 1999b; Biesta, 1995; 1998; Biesta & Egea-Kuehne, 2001). This raises the questionwhat postmodern and poststructural thought have to offer for the field of moral development and moral education. In the paper we presented at AERA 2000 (Stams & Biesta, 2000[1]) weembarked on this task by means of a reconstruction and critical analysis of current (empirical) research programs onmoral development and education. Our analysis included Kohlberg's stage theoryof moral reasoning, Rest's four. component model of moral functioning, Blasi's model of themoral self, Gibbs's integrationist sociomoral theory, Gilligan's ethic of care, Eisenberg's approach toprosocial reasoning, Turiel's domain approach of social knowledge, as well as theories of prosocial behavior,moral emotion, moral character, and critical thinking. Kohlberg's theory functioned as our main pointof reference, since most of the research in the field can be seen as either a reaction to his position, or a(critical) extension of his approach. Since we were especially interested in the relationship betweentheoretical and empirical research our focus was on the question of construct validity inempirical research on moral development and education. 1 3 We structured our discussion around four issues which, so weargued, are central to contemporary research on moral development andeducation. These issues are: [1] the question of the demarcation of the moral domain (Whatconstitutes the moral domain? What counts as moral behavior?); [2] the question of the relationship between "is" and "ought" (Isthere a gap between "is" and "ought"? Can it be bridged? Should it be bridged?); [3] the question of moral motivation and its relationship to moral action(How to move from cognition to action? Is there a gap between cognition and action? Doescognition precede action?); [4] the question of moral relativism (Are there standards for morality? If so,how can they be known and how can they be justified? Can we avoid both rigid dogmatismand empty neutrality?). Our analysis not only revealed the inconclusiveness of manyif not most of the discussions around these four issues. It also became clear that it was not possible to validate central constructsin the research on moral development and education on the basis of the outcome of empiricalresearch alone. Not only did this indicate the need for (further) conceptual investigationand hence for (further) theoretical and philosophical research.It also became clear that conceptualizations define the phenomenon under investigation in such a manner that it is only within the context and onthe basis a specific conceptualization (e.g., of what is considered to be included in the moral domain; orof what is considered to count as moral action) that the outcomes of empirical research (oftenfocussing on developmental processes "within" a specific conceptualization) could be interpreted andbe given meaning. Our analysis further revealed that many of the problems that we encountered inreconstructing the field could be related to a specific conceptualization of morality and moral action, which itselfrelied upon a specific conceptualization of human subjectivityand human agency. The problems that we encountered in the discussions about moral action, moral motivation, and moral behavior (issue3), for example, could all be traced back to a model in which "outer" action is assumed to be causedby "inner" steering mechanisms (such as, for example, cognition). This conception of humansubjectivity also played a prominent role in the notions of morality that we discussed in ouranalysis of the 4 2 discussions on the question what constitutes the moral domain (issue 1). Thisconception also appeared to be influential in the discussions about moralrelativism (issue 4). Not only, then, did our first paper indicate the need for furthertheoretical, conceptual and philosophical research. It also indicated a certain direction for suchinvestigations in that it suggested that many problems could be traced back to a specific understandingof human subjectivity and agency and morality and ethics more generally an understanding that can becharacterized as typically modern. It made sense, in other words, to explore what a postmodern approachmight have to offer. The overall project of which this paper is a part, consists of three steps.The first step (our AERA-2000 paper subtitled 'Clearing the terrain') provided a criticaloverview of the current field. The second step in our project (subtitled Mapping the terrain') is meant toprovide an overview of postmodern and poststructural approaches to ethics and morality. On thebasis of this, our third step (subtitled 'Shifting the terrain') will be an attempt to articulate a postmoderntheory of moral education. One of the problems with the second part of the project is that thenotions 'postmodern' and 'poststructural' refer to a wide variety of different approaches, positions,theories and ideas, even if restricted to
Recommended publications
  • Qualitative Freedom
    Claus Dierksmeier Qualitative Freedom - Autonomy in Cosmopolitan Responsibility Translated by Richard Fincham Qualitative Freedom - Autonomy in Cosmopolitan Responsibility Claus Dierksmeier Qualitative Freedom - Autonomy in Cosmopolitan Responsibility Claus Dierksmeier Institute of Political Science University of Tübingen Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Translated by Richard Fincham American University in Cairo New Cairo, Egypt Published in German by Published by Transcript Qualitative Freiheit – Selbstbestimmung in weltbürgerlicher Verantwortung, 2016. ISBN 978-3-030-04722-1 ISBN 978-3-030-04723-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04723-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018964905 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classical German Idea of the University Revisited, Or on the Nationalization of the Modern Institution
    Marek KWIEK The Classical German Idea of the University Revisited, or on the Nationalization of the Modern Institution CPP RPS Volume 1 (2006) 2 Correspondence to the Author: Professor Dr. hab. Marek Kwiek Center for Public Policy Studies (CPP), Director Poznan University ul. Szamarzewskiego 89 60-569 Poznan, Poland e-mail [email protected] A list of the Center for Public Policy Studies “Research Papers” and other currently published publications is available online at the CPP website http://www.cpp.amu.edu.pl/publications.htm. Hard copies of the research papers are available upon request The Center for Public Policy Studies (CPP) is an autonomous research unit of Poznan University, Poland, founded in 2002. It focuses on research in social sciences, mostly through large-scale comparative European and international research projects. Its major areas of interest include: higher education policy and research in national, European and global perspectives; research and development policies; university management and governance; reforming higher education and its legislation in Central and Eastern Europe; higher education and regional development; public services; the processes of Europeanization and globalization; theories of the welfare state; theories of democracy, as well as political and economic transition in European postcommunist countries. See http://www.cpp.amu.edu.pl/htm. The CPP Research Papers Series is intended to disseminate the findings of work in progress and to communicate preliminary research results to the academic community and the wider audience. Papers are subject to further revisions and therefore all comments and suggestions to authors are welcome. 3 Abstract The aim of the paper is to provide a philosophical and historical background to current discussions about the changing relationships between the university and the state (and the university and society) through revisiting the classical “Humboldtian” model of the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Beck's Cosmopolitan Politics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online A later version of this article is in Contemporary Politics 14, 2, June 2008 Beck’s Cosmopolitan Politics Luke Martell Abstract This article evaluates Ulrich Beck’s cosmopolitan global politics. I argue that areas where Beck sees bases for communal and cosmopolitan politics are structured by power, inequality and conflict. Beck has a conflict perspective on local responses to globalisation but this is not carried through to his global politics. There are issues that need to be tackled at a global level but I argue that this will have to be done on the basis of conflicting interests, power and nation-states as much as through global cosmopolitanism and co-operation. Keywords: Ulrich Beck, globalisation, cosmopolitanism, conflict, power. Ulrich Beck argues for global cosmopolitan politics with a co-operative and consensual approach over state-based and conflictual politics with a ‘national outlook’. This article focuses on Beck’s books Cosmopolitan Vision (2006) and What is Globalisation? (2000) and associated articles (eg Beck, 2000a, Beck and Sznaider, 2006). It is relevant also to his books on Power in the Global Age (2005) and Europe (Beck and Grande 2007) and, in parts, to other advocacies of cosmopolitan politics (eg Held, 1995, Archibugi and Held 1995, Kaldor 2003). I wish to argue that power, inequality and conflict, and a role for nations, are acknowledged by Beck but undermine his cosmopolitan outlook. Beck is important for his analyses of modernisation and the development of a ‘second modernity’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies Zygmunt Bauman
    To purchase this product, please visit https://www.wiley.com/en-uz/9780745610160 Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies Zygmunt Bauman E-Book 978-0-745-65666-3 May 2013 £15.99 Paperback 978-0-745-61016-0 October 1992 Out of stock £16.99 DESCRIPTION Zygmunt Bauman's new book is a brilliant exploration, from a sociological point of view, of the 'taboo' subject in modern societies: death and dying. The book develops a new theory of the ways in which human mortality is reacted to, and dealt with, in social institutions and culture. The hypothesis explored in the book is that the necessity of human beings to live with the constant awareness of death accounts for crucial aspects of the social organization of all known societies. Two different 'life strategies' are distinguished in respect of reactions to mortality. One, 'the modern strategy', deconstructs mortality by translating the insoluble issue of death into many specific problems of health and disease which are 'soluble in principle'. The 'post-modern strategy' is one of deconstructing immortality: life is transformed into a constant rehearsal of 'reversible death', a substitution of 'temporary disappearance' for the irrevocable termination of life. This profound and provocative book will appeal to a wide audience. It will also be of particular interest to students and professionals in the areas of sociology, anthropology, theology and philosophy. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Zygmunt Bauman (1925-2017) was Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the Universities of Leeds and Warsaw. He is the author of a number of other books including the extremely successful Modernity and the Holocaust (Polity, 1989) which won the 1989 European Amalfi Prize for Sociology and Social Theory, and Modernity and Ambivalence (Polity, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Agency and Structure in Zygmunt Bauman's Modernity and The
    Agency and structure in Zygmunt Bauman’s Modernity and the Holocaust Shaun Best University of Winchester Abstract The article explores how in Modernity and the Holocaust to his liquid turn writings Zygmunt Bauman’s work assumes that people live in a deterministic world. Bauman fails to distinguish agency as an analytical category in its own right and as such fails to capture self-determination, agential control and moral responsibility. All of Bauman’s work is based upon the assumption that the individual loses their autonomy and the ability to judge the moral content of their actions because of adiaphortic processes external to themselves as individuals giving rise to agentic state in which the individual is unable to exercise their agency. In contrast to the argument in Modernity and the Holocaust this article suggests that the Nazis developed a distinct communitarian ethical code rooted in self-control that encouraged individuals to overcome their personal feeling states, enabling them to engage in acts of cruelty to people defined as outside of the community. In his post-2000 work where the emphasis is on the process of liquefaction there is the same undervaluing of human agency in the face of external forces reflected in Bauman’s concepts of ambivalence, fate and swarm. Keywords: Bauman, agency, Holocaust, agentic state, adiaphoric 2014 marks twenty-five years since the publication of Zygmunt Bauman’s most influential text Modernity and the Holocaust. The book established Bauman’s reputation as a critic of modernity and as a major European social thinker. In this book agential self-control has no role to play in Bauman’s explanation of the Holocaust and the undervaluing of human agency was to become a common theme in Bauman’s later postmodern and liquid turn.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Otherness? This Page Provides a Sociological Definition Of
    What is Otherness? This page provides a sociological definition of otherness and how it works in societies. I will also include examples and resources for people interested in learning more about otherness. I will add to this page over time. Defining Otherness The idea of ‘otherness​ ’​ is central to sociological analyses of how majority and minority identities are constructed. This is because the representation of different groups within any given society is controlled by groups that have greater political power. In order to understand the notion of The Other, sociologists first seek to put a critical spotlight on the ways in which social identities are constructed. Identities are often thought as being natural or innate – something that we are born with – but sociologists highlight that this taken-for-granted view is not true. Rather than talking about the individual characteristics or personalities of different individuals, which is generally the focus for psychology, sociologists focus on social​ identities.​ Social identities reflect the way individuals and groups internalise established social categories within their societies, such as their cultural (or ethnic) identities, gender identities, class identities, and so on. These social categories shape our ideas about who we think we are, how we want to be seen by others, and the groups to which we belong. George Herbert Mead’s classic text, Mind​ Self and Society,​ established that social identities are created through our ongoing social interaction with other people and our subsequent self-reflection about who we think we are according to these social exchanges. Mead’s work shows that identities are produced through agreement, disagreement, and negotiation with other people.
    [Show full text]
  • Sketches in the Theory of Culture. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(3), Pp
    Dawson, M. (2019) Book review: Sketches in the Theory of Culture. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(3), pp. 432-436. (doi:10.1177/1368431018815010). This is the author’s final accepted version. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/172486/ Deposited on: 05 November 2018 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Humanist Structuration Theory: Review of Zygmunt Bauman’s Sketches in the Theory of Culture Zygmunt Bauman, Sketches in the Theory of Culture. Edited with a Preface by Dariusz Brzeziński. Translated by Katarzyna Bartoszyńska. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018. 289 pp. 9781509528301, £17.99 pbk Zygmunt Bauman’s work has been categorised in many ways, but it is unlikely ‘structuralist anthropology informed by Levi-Strauss and semiotics’ has been a common classification. Nevertheless, Sketches in the Theory of Culture, a collection of essays originally due to be published in 1968, encourages us to think in precisely these terms. Bauman’s 2016 afterword refers to the book as a key part of ‘a “Levi-straussian” period in my thinking, inquiries and writings’ the ‘indelible traces’ of which ‘are still easily detected, even in my most recent publications’ (p. 251). This text, a must-read for anyone seeking to understand the nature of Bauman’s project and a useful source for those interested in theories of culture and the history of sociology in Poland in the 1960s, with especial insights concerning Bauman’s humanism and structuration theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1
    International Political Sociology (2010) 4, 325–338 Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1 David Lyon Queen’s University Liquid surveillance describes well today’s regimes of in ⁄ visibility and is characterized by data-flows, mutating surveillance agencies and the tar- geting and sorting of everyone. However, the great virtue of Zygmunt Bauman’s work for surveillance studies is that he engages several tasks: he contextualizes what might be called liquid surveillance within the major movements of modern society, recognizes the significance of changing forms of surveillance to the production of social order, encourages serious consideration of the lived realities of in ⁄ visibility, refuses to accept monocausal explanations of the surveillant vision and dynamic, and confronts courageously the ethical and political chal- lenges that surveillance now presents to our world. Bauman’s work on surveillance spans his illustrious career as a social thinker but as yet awaits full exploration and exposition. Today’s Big Brother is not about keeping people in and making them stick to the line, but about kicking people out and making sure that when they are kicked out that they will duly go and won’t come back… (Bauman 2006:25) Liquid surveillance captures the core of what can be learned about surveillance from Zygmunt Bauman. Although Bauman does not use this phrase, it aptly con- nects his work with surveillance studies. It speaks to the looseness and frailty of social bonds, seen in surveillance terms as the transformation of ordinary citizens into suspects and their relegation to consumer status across a range of life-spheres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory
    The British Journal of Sociology 2006 Volume 57 Issue 1 The cosmopolitan imagination: critical cosmopolitanism and social theory Gerard Delanty Abstract Critical cosmopolitanism is an emerging direction in social theory and reflects both an object of study and a distinctive methodological approach to the social world. It differs from normative political and moral accounts of cosmopolitanism as world polity or universalistic culture in its conception of cosmopolitanism as socially situated and as part of the self-constituting nature of the social world itself. It is an approach that shifts the emphasis to internal developmental processes within the social world rather than seeing globalization as the primary mechanism. This signals a post-universalistic kind of cosmopolitanism, which is not merely a condition of diversity but is articulated in cultural models of world openness through which societies undergo transformation. The cosmopolitan imagination is articulated in framing processes and cultural models by which the social world is constituted; it is therefore not reducible to concrete identities, but should be under- stood as a form of cultural contestation in which the logic of translation plays a central role. The cosmopolitan imagination can arise in any kind of society and at any time but it is integral to modernity, in so far as this is a condition of self- problematization, incompleteness and the awareness that certainty can never be established once and for all. As a methodologically grounded approach, critical cosmopolitan sociology has a very specific task: to discern or make sense of social transformation by identifying new or emergent social realities. Keywords: Culture; globalization; global publics; modernity; social transformation; society The idea of cosmopolitanism is most recognizable as a term of political gov- ernance but with a history that extends to the Enlightenment and to classical antiquity.1 Until recently it was not associated with social processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Tony Blackshaw A man who wants the truth becomes a scientist; a man who wants to give free play to his subjectivity may become a writer; but what should a man do who wants something in between? Robert Musil Imagination is not, as is sometimes thought, the ability to invent; it is the ability to disclose that which exists. John Berger Every now and then a thinker rearranges the cognitive furniture inside my head. To date, one of the most influential of these has been Zygmunt Bauman. His work, when I first began to read it properly during my doc- toral studies, was unlike anything I had encountered in sociology. It was a stunning revelation. The actual epiphany – which was so incredible that a physical thrill ran through me as it dawned that another kind of thinking existed – occurred whilst I was reading Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies.1 This is a book in which we see Bauman at the height of his sociological powers. It takes a single subject – death – and finds doors to open in all directions. Amongst many other things it brilliantly reveals is that what is most important surrounding its topic is not that mortality is as certain as paying taxes, or even that for some people immortality is a pervasive need, but that without death life is not worth living. I have never read anything as exacting as this account of the human passage through life. Reading the book made me realize two important integrated things: on the one hand, the hardest thing of all to see is often what is directly in front of our eyes and, on the other, that thinking sociologically with Bauman is above all else about learning to see differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluidity and Education International Dialogues on Education, 2019, Volume 6, Number 2, Pp
    Oberlechner: Fluidity and Education International Dialogues on Education, 2019, Volume 6, Number 2, pp. 52-62 ISSN 2198-5944 Manfred Oberlechner (Austria) Fluidity and Education Abstract: This article shows why and how fluidity educates and is therefore of educational relevance for student teachers. If education sees the developmental process of the whole person, with regard to his or her "humanity", as a life-long learning process, in which the individual expands his or her intellectual, cul- tural, creative and practical abilities and skills, then fluidity offers new perspectives for pedagogy. Educa- tion is then related to the subject’s exploration of inner and outer fluid realities, as processes of learning or socialization in an increasingly fluid postmodern society. Keywords: education, fluidity, postmodern society, migration, identity * * * 摘要 (Manfred Oberlechner: 流动性与教育): 文章讲述了流动性为何以及是如何形成的,并对师范专业 的学生是具有教育相关性的。如果教育通过提高人的精神,文化,创造力,实践技能和能力,从"人 性"的角度将"整个人"的发展过程视为一个终生学习的过程的话,那么流动性就为教育提供了全新的 视角:教育即是指在一个不断流动的后现代社会中,不同主题之间把内在和外在流动的生命体验作为 学习的过程而进行的一种相互探讨。 关键词:教育,流动性,后现代,迁移,身份 摘要 (Manfred Oberlechner: 流動性與教育): 文章講述了流動性為何以及是如何形成的,並對師範專業 的學生是具有教育相關性的。如果教育通過提高人的精神,文化,創造力,實踐技能和能力,從"人 性"的角度將"整個人"的發展過程視為一個終生學習的過程的話,那麼流動性就為教育提供了全新的 視角:教育即是指在一個不斷流動的後現代社會中,不同主題之間把內在和外在流動的生命體驗作為 學習的過程而進行的一種相互探討。 52 關鍵詞:教育,流動性,後現代,遷移,身份 * * * Zusammenfassung (Manfred Oberlechner: Fluidität und Bildung): Der Artikel zeigt, warum und wie Flu- idität bildet und für Lehramtsstudierende daher bildungsrelevant ist. Wenn Bildung den Entwicklungs- prozess des "gesamten Menschen" im Hinblick auf sein "Menschsein" als lebenslangen Lernprozess be- greift, indem er seine geistigen, kulturellen, kreativen und praktischen Fähigkeiten und Kompetenzen er- weitert, dann bietet Fluidität für die Pädagogik neue Perspektiven: Bildung bezieht sich dann auf die Aus- einandersetzung des Subjekts mit inneren wie äußeren fluiden Lebenswirklichkeiten als Lernprozesse in einer zunehmend fluiden postmodernen Gesellschaft.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brave New World: the Left, Social Engineering, and Eugenics in Twentieth-Century Europe*
    IRSH 55 (2010), pp. 265–296 doi:10.1017/S0020859010000209 r 2010 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis SURVEY A Brave New World: The Left, Social Engineering, and Eugenics in Twentieth-Century Europe* L EO L UCASSEN Institute for History, Faculty of Humanities, Universiteit Leiden E-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY: This article compares theories and social policies of social democrats and other representatives of the left-wing political spectrum in six European countries to explain why, in certain countries such as Sweden, Norway, and Switzerland, weak social groups became the target of illiberal and negative eugenic policy, especially isolation and sterilization, while elsewhere left-wing politicians and theorists were far less radical. One striking feature that emerges is the difference between a communitarian-organic and a class-bound form of socialism. Following Zygmunt Bauman, Michel Foucault, and James C. Scott, the article discerns a first variant of citizenship that is conditional and intended only for those with the right social attitude. Eugenics was perfectly consistent with such a view, since it offered a diagnosis and at the same time a cure. Prominent representatives of this approach were the Webbs in Britain and the Myrdals in Sweden. Such an organic-medical approach was less likely, however, in a more class-dependent variant of socialism embedded in a strong civil society. As long as social democrats and other leftist politicians believed social problems such as inequality and poverty were caused primarily by an unjust capitalist system, there was little cause for a eugenicist solution. * This article previously appeared in Dutch in a collection of essays edited by Jan van Bavel and Jan Kok, ‘‘De levenskracht der bevolking’’.
    [Show full text]