DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Use and Housing Element 31 Draft Southside Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Use and Housing Element 31 Draft Southside Plan DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN LAND USE AND HOUSING I. Strategic Statement II. Existing Conditions III. Development Opportunities and Constraints IV. Objectives and Policies V. Summary of Current and Proposed Zoning Standards A JOINT PLAN BY THE CITY OF BERKELEY AND THELAND UNIVERSITY USE ANDOF C HOUSINGALIFORNIA, BELEMENTERKELEY 29 DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN I. STRATEGIC STATEMENT The Southside is one of the most dense, dynamic, and diverse areas in Berkeley. Geographically, it is a relatively small area, just 28 city blocks or 2.5% of Berkeley’s land area. However, it is home to more than 11,000 people, including nearly 9,000 UC students, and comprises 10% of the City’s population. The Southside receives tens of thousands of visitors each year and has thousands of pedestrians on its streets every day. In addition, it is home to the University of California, one of the largest employers in the City and the locus of much of the City’s cultural and intellectual life. The Southside is a true mixed-use neighborhood offering residents and visitors housing, offices, retail shops, schools, churches, social institu- tions, parks and open space, recreational facilities and parking. The neighborhood is located within walking distance of BART, and is served by seven bus lines and several shuttle services. The pedestrian scale, of the neighborhood allows one to easily walk from a residence to a grocery store, a recreational facility, a museum, the UC Berkeley campus or Downtown Berkeley. The existing conditions section that follows provides background information about the existing land uses in the Southside. The subsequent land use and housing policy recommendations attempt to address the sometimes conflicting values and needs of different community stakeholders and to facilitate the development of a cohesive blueprint for the future of the Southside. The land use objectives and policies are organized around the following goals: u Create additional housing in the Southside for both stu- dents and year-round residents, built by the University, the private sector, student cooperatives, non-profits or a co m- bination of these groups working in partnership; u Encourage the construction of infill buildings, particularly new housing and mixed-use developments, on currently underutilized sites such as surface parking lots and vacant lots; u Encourage reinvestment in deteriorating housing stock to improve the overall physical quality of the neighborhood; u Enhance the pedestrian orientation of the Southside; LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENT 31 DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN u Improve the Bancroft Way corridor as a physical connection and transition between the University and the Southside; u Ensure that new development complements the existing ar- chitectural character of the area; u Refine and reinforce the existing land use patterns in the Southside by acknowledging three distinct “subareas” of land uses in the area: the Residential Subarea, the Urban Mixed Use Subarea, and the Commercial Subarea. Create specific policies for each subarea. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The Southside contains a diverse mixture of land uses including: housing, offices, retail shops, religious, cultural and social institutions, schools, parking, and recreational uses. While the physical form of the Southside has been altered over the years, particularly with University acquisition and demolition of buildings in the Southside during the 1960's, historic land use patterns are still discernible. A. Southside Land Use Patterns § The commercial shopping area is concentrated along Telegraph Avenue, Durant Avenue and Bancroft Way. Housing is located above approximately one-fifth of the retail shops. § Residential uses are located throughout the Southside and vary in scale. The smaller-scaled residential uses are primarily concentrated west of Dana Street. There are many older apartment buildings in this area and many single-family homes that have been converted to apartments and rooming houses. There are also single-family and two-family houses. Medium-scaled residential buildings are located primarily east of College Avenue, where there is a concentration of fraternities, sororities, and student cooperatives and apartment buildings, and along Telegraph Avenue where apartm ents are located above retail shops. High-rise residential buildings are located adjacent to College Avenue (eight nine- story buildings) and east of Dana Street (four nine-story buildings), all of which are UC residence halls. Map LU-2: Existing Land Uses 32 LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENT DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN § Religious, social and cultural institutions are located throughout the area, but most are concentrated in the area east of Ellsworth and west of College Avenue, between the distinctly residential areas and the commercial core. § Most of the offices in the Southside, many of which are institutional offices, are located in the same general area as the religious and social institutions, east of Ellsworth Street and west of College Avenue. § Parking is scattered throughout the area, in on-street and off-street locations owned by the City, the University and private parties. Parking garages are concentrated primarily in the commercial core or on the University campus outside the Southside study area, just north of Bancroft Way. B. University Ownership The University of California owns approximately 30% of the land area in the Southside (excluding streets). All of the land owned by the University in the Southside is currently in use. The University's property contains a wide variety of land uses including residence halls, academic offices, student support facilities, parking lots, and recreational and cultural facilities. Map LU-3: Property owned by the University of California LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENT 33 DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN C. Area Zoning Virtually all of the Southside is zoned R-4 and R-4H (multi-family residential) and C-T (commercial). The types of uses that are allowed within these zoning designations and key development standards are described below. A chart summarizing the zoning development standards for the Southside is included on the last page of this Element. The C-T zoned commercial area (commercial Telegraph) allows ground floor retail uses and housing on the upper floors. This is the only zoning district in Berkeley where new developments are not required to provide parking (except for the blocks located south of Dwight Way) and it is the only commercial district in Berkeley where office uses are not allowed on the upper floors of buildings (unless they are second floor offices directly serving the ground floor retail use). Retail and housing are the intended land uses in this zoning district. The maximum height allowed for new or expanded buildings is four stories with a fourth floor setback requirement. This district’s minimum two story height requirement for new buildings is intended to encourage housing to be built above retail shops. There are a few sites in the Southside that are zoned C-1 (general commercial), which allows buildings up to four stories. On the western boundary of the Southside study area a few sites are zoned C-2 (Downtown commercial) and C- SA, (commercial south area) which applies primarily to the South Shattuck neighborhood. The C-2 zone allows a variety of uses such as retail, office and residential uses, and allows buildings up to seven stories in height under specific conditions. The C-SA zone allows a variety of uses such as retail, office and residential uses and, under specific conditions, buildings up to five stories. Over half of the Southside is zoned R-4, multi-family residential. This zoning district allows a variety of residential uses including single-family houses, apartments, residence halls, rooming housing, fraternities and sororities. It also allows offices, hotels, schools, churches, senior housing, parks, parking lots and parking structures. Buildings may be up to six stories and 65’ in height. Parking for new buildings must be provided at the rate of one parking space for each apartment or every five residents of a rooming house or fraternity and sorority. Map LU-4: Existing Zoning 34 LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENT DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN The hillside zoning district (R-4H) differs from the R-4 in that the maximum building height allowed is three stories, 35’ in height. In addition, the building setbacks can be reduced with a use permit instead of a variance. An interim zoning change, effective until June 2000, states that new office uses are not allowed in the R-4H zone, nor is the conversion of existing residential uses to office uses. While the University campus is zoned R-5, high density residential, the University as a state agency is exempt under state law from complying with local zoning regulations. The University does comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and does an internal design review of all new campus developments. In addition, the University typically brings new development proposals to City commissions such as the Planning Commission, the Design Review Committee and the Landmarks Preservation Commission for input. Map LU-5: Building height allowed by current city zoning LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENT 35 DRAFT SOUTHSIDE PLAN D. Residential Land Use The majority of the land in the Southside, 57% (excluding streets), is used as residential housing, accommodating the more than 11,000 people who live in the neighborhood. Unlike the rest of Berkeley, the vast majority of residential buildings in the Southside are multi-family or group living buildings, which include apartments, residence halls, fraternities, sororities and rooming houses. The residential areas of the Southside are zoned R-4 and R-4H, multi-family residential and comprise a substantial portion of a ring of high-density housing located on the north, south and west edges of the university campus. The Southside contains 5,350 dwelling units (every two beds of campus housing and group living quarters is considered, for the purposes of this Plan, one housing unit). As Table LU-1 indicates, renters occupy 96% of the dwelling units in the Southside, a sharp contrast to the City as a whole, in which renters occupy only 54% of the housing units.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Southside Plan
    Exhibit A - Attachment 3 – Southside Plan Page 1 of 183 SOUTHSIDE PLAN City Council Draft September 2011 City of Berkeley Exhibit A - Attachment 3 – Southside Plan Page 2 of 183 Exhibit A - Attachment 3 – Southside Plan Page 3 of 183 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND PLAN GOALS ........................................................................... 5 SOUTHSIDE PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................... 11 RELATED PLANNING STUDIES ................................................................................. 19 LAND USE AND HOUSING ELEMENT ....................................................................... 29 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ................................................................................... 67 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT .................................................................. 101 COMMUNITY CHARACTER ELEMENT .................................................................... 121 PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT...................................................................................... 147 APPENDIX A: SOUTHSIDE OPPORTUNITY SITES ................................................. 171 APPENDIX B: CIRCULATION ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN THE DEIR ........ 175 APPENDIX C: DESIGNATED OR LISTED HISTORIC RESOURCES AS OF APRIL 2009 ............................................................................................................................ 179 Exhibit A - Attachment 3 – Southside Plan Page 4 of 183 Exhibit A - Attachment 3 – Southside Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Sixteen of Tfoe\$Everiteen Items Comprising This Multiple Resources Nomination Are Structures; One Item, Founders' Rock, Is a Natural Feature of the Campus
    Check one Check one JL ©KCfsllent __ deteriorated X unaltered X original site JL gooft __ ruins -X altered __ moved date _ fair __ unexposed the present and original (if known) physical appearance Sixteen of tfoe\$everiteen items comprising this Multiple Resources Nomination are structures; one item, Founders' Rock, is a natural feature of the campus. The manmade structures are located on the central campus of the University of California (see appended maps). By their location, orientation toward major and mirldr axes, and Neo-Classic architectural style, they define the formal, turn-of-the-century concept of the University. Although a few of the structures have received exterior and interior alterations, their general architectural integrity is high. The items are divided into the following categories and described in sequence on the continuation pages. a. Individual Buildings or Structures 1) Hearst Greek Theatre, John Galen Howard, Architect; 1903 2) North Gate Hall, John Galen Howard, Architect; 1906 3) Hearst Memorial Mining Building, John Galen Howard, Architect; 1907 4) Sather Gate and Bridge, John Galen Howard, Architect; 1910 5) Hearst Gymnasium for Women, Bernard Maybeck and Julia Morgan, Architects; 1927 b. Buildings or Groups of Buildings and Their Landscaped Settings 1) Faculty Club a) (Men's) Faculty Club and Faculty Glade, Bernard Maybeck, Architect; 1902 2) Campanile Way and Esplanade a) Sather Tower (Campanile) and the Esplanade, John Galen Howard, Architect; 1914 b) South Hall, David Farquharson, Architect; 1873 c) Wheeler
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 1965 an Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008)
    one Spring 1965 An Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008) in january 1965, in the wake of the turbulent Free Speech Movement on the Berkeley campus and the demise of its chancellor, Edward Strong, the new acting chancellor, Martin Meyerson, asked me to join his staff as a special assistant in the area of student political activity. This was the hottest seat in the chancellor’s offi ce at that moment, given the political fragility of the campus. I served eight months in that capacity until a new chancellor, Roger Heyns, was appointed and I took a scheduled sabbatical leave. Those months were a tense and uncertain period that resulted in an unsteady but palpable restoration of authority on the Berkeley campus and a few steps toward campus “normalcy.” They also constituted a period of rapid and mandatory political learning on my part and one of the most demanding seasons of my life. Over the years many colleagues have asked me to write about this important transitional period, both because it has received less attention than the historic Free Speech Movement days of late 1964 and because I had an “insider’s” point of view; now, in 2008, I have fi nally acceded to those requests. I have returned to the archives of the chancellor’s offi ce, to accounts of the events in the press, and to my personal recollections. The staff of the Bancroft Library were very helpful in supplying materials relevant to the Meyerson administration from the fi les of the chancellor’s offi ce. I also benefi ted from the research assistance of Ziza Delgado and Catherine Shepard-Haier.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel at 70 Challenges and Opportunities
    34th ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISRAEL STUDIES ISRAEL AT 70 CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES June 25-27, 2018 BERKELEY INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW BERKELEY INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW Boalt Hall R239B Berkeley, CA 94720-7220 - 2 - 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Israel Studies ISRAEL AT SEVENTY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES JUNE 25-27, 2018 | BERKELEY INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY SCHOOL OF LAW, BERKELEY, CA PROGRAM COMMITTEE CLAUDE FISCHER & BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DR. BAT-ZION ERAQI KORMAN SHIRA OFFER ASSOCIATION FOR The Open University KENNETH BAMBERGER Sociology ISRAEL STUDIES of Israel Chair ELIE REKHESS & PAUL SCHAM PRESIDENT DR. RACHEL FISH RON HASSNER Arab-Israel Conflict DR. DONNA ROBINSON DIVINE Brandeis University Chair Smith College SARA HIRSCHHORN & DR. REUVEN GAFNI REBECCA GOLBERT YAACOV YADGAR VICE-PRESIDENT Kinneret College Conference Coordinator Zionism DR. YORAM PERI University of Maryland DR. RACHEL S. HARRIS SHARON ARONSON LEHAVI & AZIZA KHAZOOM & The University of Illinois YARON PELEG ESTHER MEIR-GLITZENSTEIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Film and Theater Ethnic Identities DR. MOSHE NAOR DR. NAHAUM KARLINSKY University of Haifa Ben-Gurion University ILANA SZOBEL & OFRA BACKENROTH & PHILIP HOLLANDER ALEX SINCLAIR TREASURER DR. RAMI ZEEDAN Hebrew Literature Education DR. ILAN BEN-AMI The Open University The Open University of Israel TAL DEKEL NURIT NOVIS DEUTCH, of Israel Visual Arts LEON WIENER DOW & DR. NADAV SHELEF MICHAL SHAUL University of SHULAMIT REINHARZ & Religious Studies RACHEL HARRIS BOARD MEMBERS, Wisconsin-Madison Gender Studies ITAY FISCHHENDLER & SECOND TERM DR.
    [Show full text]
  • 2506 SHATTUCK AVENUE, BERKELEY on the Southern End of Vibrant Downtown Berkeley
    2506 SHATTUCK AVENUE, BERKELEY On the Southern End of Vibrant Downtown Berkeley HIGH VISIBILITY SHATTUCK AVENUE RETAIL FOR LEASE SIZE: ± 1,206 rsf LEASE RATE: $3.25/psf month NNN CONTACT: Kevin Gordon • 510 898-0513 • [email protected] • CalBRE# 01884390 GORDON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES • 2091 Rose Street Berkeley, CA 94709 www.gordoncommercial.com • T 510 704-1800 • F 510 704-1830 • CalBRE # 00789365 SHATTUCK AVENUE RETAIL, ADJACENT TO DOWNTOWN BERKELEY. Ground floor of mixed-use building. PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Open floor plan • Street parking in front of space • Good signage opportunities • 3 blocks to Telegraph Avenue • 6 blocks to Downtown BART Plaza • 8 blocks to Ashby BART, Sports Basement and Berkeley Bowl Marketplace • Co-tenants: Airport Home Appliance, Frausto’s, Stonemountain & Daughter Fabrics • Close to Viking Trader Furniture, Artist & Craftsman Supply, Trek Bicycle Berkeley, Orangetheory Fitness, Grassroots CrossFit, Funky Door Yoga, and Equinox Gym • Around corner from Sutter Alta Bates Medical Center: Herrick Campus • Short walk to UC Berkeley campus with 56,000+ daily population • Near 350 new residential units in a 2-block radius, including The Dwight (99 new luxury apartment units across the street). Several are approved, under construction or in the permitting process • Zoned C-SA (Commercial South Area) DOWNTOWN BERKELEY HIGHLIGHTS • Downtown Berkeley is the cultural epicenter of the East Bay • More than 150 restaurant and dining options – plus a wide range of entertainment including live theater,
    [Show full text]
  • E Pluribus Unum: the Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964 Madeleine Riskin-Kutz
    E pluribus unum: The Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964 Madeleine Riskin-Kutz Free Speech Movement march through Sather Gate, Mona Hutchin on the extreme right (marchers’ perspective) and Mario Savio on the extreme left. From Warshaw p.56, photo credit: Ron Enfield, Nov. 20, 1964 Madeleine R-K, E pluribus unum, cont. During the academic year of 1964-65, a political movement took place at the University of California (UC), Berkeley bringing together students and faculty from across the political spectrum — from communists to campaigners for right-wing Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. Members of the movement united in their demand for free speech on campus and specifically, to be allowed to set up tables on campus to campaign for political causes. Their movement took place through demonstrations and sit-ins, ultimately achieving success in December 1964, when the academic senate voted unanimously to approve a resolution that there would henceforth be no restrictions on the content of speech or political advocacy on campus, except in regard to time, place and manner. Histories of the Free Speech Movement (FSM) have represented it as left wing and have therefore overlooked one of its essential features: it was a broad coalition operating largely by consensus among people with widely differing political views. By restoring the center-to-right wing side of the history of the FSM, we can first of all recognize this broad coalition’s existence, then also understand it was possible because of a form of universalism among students. A universal principle united the members of the Free Speech Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • 8804110 the Free Speech Movement: a Case Study In
    8804110 THE FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT: A CASE STUDY IN THE RHETORIC OF SOCIAL INTERVENTION Stoner, Mark Reed, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1987 © 1987 Stoner, Mark Reed All rights reserved 300 N. ZeebRd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages_____ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or_______ print 3. Photographs with dark background_____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy_______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ^ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides_______ of page 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several________ pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost_______ in spine 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct_______ print 11. Page(s) ____________lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s)____________seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages______ 15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received__________ 16. Other____________________________________________________________________________ UMI THE FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT: A CASE STUDY IN THE RHETORIC OF SOCIAL INTERVENTION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Mark Reed Stoner, B.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1987 Dissertation Committee: Approved By John J. Makay William R. Brown / Adviser James L. Golden department of Comrrtlmication Copyr ight © by Mark Reed Stoner 1987 To My Wife, Daria, and my Children, Ian and Heather Whose Encouragement, Love and Support Made This Project Possible i i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the invaluable help o£ my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Parking Map
    Campus Parking Map 1 2 3 4 5 University of Mediterranean California Botanical Garden of PARKING DESIGNATION Human Garden Asian Old Roses Bicycle Dismount Zone Genome Southern Australasian South 84 Laboratory Julia African American (M-F 8am-6pm) Morgan New World Central Campus permit Rd Hall C vin Desert al 74 C Herb Campus building 86 83 Garden F Faculty/staff permit Cycad & Chinese Palm Medicinal Garden Herb Construction area 85 Garden S Student permit Miocene Eastern Mexican/ 85B Central Forest North P Botanical American American a Visitor Information n Disabled (DP) parking Strawberry Garden o Botanical r Entrance Lot Mather Californian a Redwood Garden m Entrance ic Grove Emergency Phone P Public Parking (fee required)** A l l P A i a SSL F P H V a c r No coins needed - Dial 9-911 or 911e Lower T F H e Lot L r Gaus e i M Motorcycle permit s W F a Mathematical r Molecular e y SSL H ial D R n Campus parking lot Sciences nn Foundry d a Upper te National 73 d en r Research C o RH Lot Center for J Residence Hall permit Institute r Electron Lo ire Tra e Permit parking street F i w n l p Microscopy er 66 Jorda p 67 U R Restricted 72 3 Garage entrance 62 MSRI P H Hill Area permit Parking 3 Garage level designation Only Grizzly 3 77A rrace Peak CP Carpool parking permit (reserved until 10 am) Te Entrance Coffer V Dam One way street C 31 y H F 2 Hill 77 Lot a P ce W rra Terrace CS Te c CarShare Parking 69 i Streetm Barrier V e 1 a P rrac Lots r Te o n a V Visitor Parking on-campus P V Lawrence P East Bicycle Parking - Central Campus Lot 75A
    [Show full text]
  • Visit-Berkeley-Official-Visitors-Guide
    Contents 3 Welcome 4 Be a Little Berkeley 6 Accommodations 16 Restaurants 30 Local Libations 40 Arts & Culture 46 Things to Do 52 Shopping Districts 64 #VisitBerkeley 66 Outdoor Adventures & Sports 68 Berkeley Marina 70 Architecture 72 Meetings & Celebrations 76 UC Berkeley 78 Travel Information 80 Transportation 81 Visitor & Community Services 82 Maps visitberkeley.com BERKELEY WELCOMES YOU! The 2018/19 Official Berkeley Visitors Guide is published by: Hello, Visit Berkeley, 2030 Addison St., Suite #102, Berkeley, CA 94704 (510) 549-7040 • www.visitberkeley.com Berkeley is an iconic American city, richly diverse with a vibrant economy inspired in EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE great measure by our progressive environ- Greg Mauldin, Chairman of the Board;General Manager, Hotel Shattuck Plaza Vice Chair, (TBA); mental and social policies. We are internationally recognized for our arts Thomas Burcham, Esq., Secretary/Treasurer; Worldwide Farmers and culinary scenes, as well as serving as home to the top public univer- Barbara Hillman, President & CEO, Visit Berkeley sity in the country – the University of California, Berkeley. UC Berkeley BOARD OF DIRECTORS is the heart of our city, and our neighborhood districts surround the Cal John Pimentel, Account Exec/Special Projects, Hornblower Cruises & Events campus with acclaimed restaurants, great independent shops and galleries, Lisa Bullwinkel, Owner; Another Bullwinkel Show world-class performing arts venues, and wonderful parks. Tracy Dean, Owner; Design Site Hal Leonard, General Manager; DoubleTree by Hilton Berkeley Marina I encourage you to discover Berkeley’s signature elements, events and Matthew Mooney, General Manager, La Quinta Inn & Suites LaDawn Duvall, Executive Director, Visitor & Parent Services UC Berkeley engaging vibe during your stay with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Bearnecessities Guide to Living on Campus at UC Berkeley
    BEARnecessities Guide to Living on Campus at UC Berkeley 2006 – 07 EMERGENCY AND RESOURCE NUMBERS For Emergencies and Crimes Which Have Just Occurred When the suspect is still nearby, or has just left dial 9-1-1 from any campus phone or (510) 642-3333 from a mobile phone or when an immediate response is needed. Non-Emergency Situations, “Old” Crimes and Business Calls . .642-6760 BEARWalk Service and Night Shuttle Service Information . .642-WALK University Police Lost and Found . .642-4936 Alta Bates Hospital . .(510) 204-1303 City of Berkeley Police Department . .(510) 981-5900 University Health Services . .642-2000 Advice Nurse . .643-7197 Health Promotion . .642-7202 Sexual Assault Counseling . .642-6074 Sexual Harassment, Title IX Officer . .643-7985 Campus Emergency Information Line . .642-4335 Campus Fire Safety Information . .642-5995 Housing Assignments Office . .642-4108 Office of Student Development . .642-3213 Welcome Week Information . .642-4970 Residential Computing . .642-HELP Student Judicial Affairs Office . .643-9069 Gender & Equity Resource Center . .642-4786 Ombudsperson for Students . .642-5754 Undergraduate Admissions . .642-3175 Financial Aid Office . .642-6442 Libraries . .642-6657 Recreational Sports Facility . .643-8038 Residence Telephone Services . .643-7000 Parking & Transportation . .643-7701 Campus Recycling and Refuse Services . .643-4612 TABLEOF CONTENTS Emergency & Resource Phone Directory . .Inside Cover Nondiscrimination Policy Statement . .2 Respect & Civility Statement . .2 Welcome . .3 Office of Student Development . .5 Residential Facilities and Services . .9 Cal Dining . .18 Residential Conduct Code . .20 Community Standards . .30 Understanding the Residential Conduct System . .34 Berkeley Campus Code of Student Conduct . .39 Health and Safety . .44 Apartment Living .
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Graduate Student Handbook
    2021 The information in this handbook is accurate as of May 2021. GRADUATE Please refer to website links for the most up-to- STUDENT date information. HANDBOOK WELCOME TO BERKELEY! What’s Inside It’s my privilege to welcome you to Berkeley, and I look forward to supporting you as you advance 2 Once you are admitted through your graduate studies. I speak for the Before you arrive 3 whole of the university when I say, 3 CalCentral “we are lucky to have you here!” 3 Enrolling in classes My focus at Berkeley has been, and will continue 4 Financial assistance to be, supporting each student as a whole 5 International student arrivals person. I see my job as ensuring that you have 6 Teaching and research the support, community, and climate you need in order to thrive during your assistantships time at Berkeley, particularly during these uncertain times. 7 Find housing The faculty, staff, and students at UC Berkeley are deeply committed to our 8 Get settled public mission and our shared vision that higher education is meant to nurture the next generation of leaders who create the knowledge that will change our 8 Residency world. You are one of those change agents. 9 Academics and research 10 Professional development While your first point of contact will be your department, my staff and I work very closely with your department’s faculty and staff to ensure that resources, 11 Technology resources funding, and support are distributed and implemented equitably across schools, 12 Health, wellness, and mental colleges, and departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Mario Savio, “An End to History” (2 December 1964)
    Voices of Democracy 10 (2015): 41-54 41 MARIO SAVIO, “AN END TO HISTORY” (2 DECEMBER 1964) DominiC Manthey Penn State University Abstract: Mario Savio’s sPeeCh in Berkeley’s SProul Hall Came near the end of a semester-long struggle by the Free SPeeCh Movement (FSM), Culminating in the movement’s largest sit-in and hundreds of student arrests. More than goal-oriented or instrumental sPeeCh, Savio’s “An End to History” is best understood as an exercise in identity-Creation, in whiCh Savio gave exPression to a unique FSM identity emerging out of New Left ideology. SPeCifiCally, Savio’s literary style and Commemoration of the Civil rights movement were Part of a ProCess of rhetoriCally forging a “post-CitizenshiP” ethos, one which also reinterPreted radiCal behavior not as a strategy but as an enactment of a new ConsCiousness and Personal awareness. Keywords: Mario Savio, University of California, Berkeley, new soCial movements, soCial movement rhetoriC, New Left rhetoriC 1 The University of California, Berkeley (UCB) was no stranger to student activism in the early 1960s. In fact, the number of student organizations on CamPus was well above the national average.1 Far from emerging out of nothing, the student-led Free SPeeCh Movement (FSM) evolved out of a mixture of rePressive administrative measures, Passionate student reactions, and months of failed CommuniCation. At the heart of this ConfliCt were two major ColleCtive actors: the UCB students and a university administration that the activists saw as bureauCratiC and unresponsive. Beginning in late SePtember of 1964, the situation at Berkeley esCalated, Culminating in a flashbulb moment on DeCember 2, 1964.
    [Show full text]