2580 Bancroft Way Mixed-Use Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2580 BANCROFT WAY MIXED-USE PROJECT Response to Comments Document State Clearinghouse No. 2017102015 JOHNSON LYMAN T h e S t a n d a r d ARCHITECTS 1375 Locust Street, #202, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 P1 925.930.9690 930.9039 fax Prepared for: 2 5 8 0 B a n c r o f t W a y 5.1.18 URBAN City of Berkeley PLANNING PARTNERS August 2018 INC. 2580 BANCROFT WAY MIXED-USE PROJECT Response to Comments Document State Clearinghouse No. 2017102015 Prepared for: City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department 1947 Center Street Berkeley, CA 94704 URBAN By: URBAN Urban Planning Partners, Inc. PLANNING PARTNERS 388 17th Street, Suite 230 INC. Oakland, CA 94612 With: BASELINE Environmental Consulting Fehr & Peers WSA, Inc. Architectural Resource Group August 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT ................................... 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS .................................................................... 1 C. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION............................................................................... 2 LIST OF COMMENTING AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS ....................... 3 A. ORGANIZATION OF COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES .................................... 3 III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ....................................................................................... 5 A. STATE, LOCAL, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES .......................................................... 7 B. INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS ................................................................. 17 C. PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS ........................................................................... 31 IV. TEXT REVISIONS ........................................................................................................ 43 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Exhibit A-1 Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment B: Supplemental Memorandum- Project Impacts Analysis of the Standard Project, 2580 Bancroft Way i BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR AUGUST 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ii I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT This Response to Comments (RTC) document has been prepared to document responses to comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) prepared for the proposed 2580 Bancroft Way Mixed-Use Project (project) (State Clearinghouse #2017102015). The Draft EIR identifies the likely environmental consequences associated with the implementation of the project and recommends mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts. This RTC document includes: a short description of the environmental review process, the comments received on the Draft EIR and responses to those comments, and text revisions to the Draft EIR in response to the comments received and/or to amplify or clarify material in the Draft EIR. This RTC document, together with the Draft EIR, constitutes the Final EIR for the proposed 2580 Bancroft Way Mixed-Use Project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS According to CEQA, lead agencies are required to consult with public agencies having jurisdiction over a proposed project and to provide the general public with an opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR. The City of Berkeley (City) circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) that briefly described the project and the environmental topics that would be evaluated in the Draft EIR. The NOP was initially published on October 3, 2017. The 30-day public comment period for the scope of the EIR lasted from October 3, 2017 to November 3, 2017. The NOP was sent to the State Clearinghouse, responsible and trustee agencies, organizations, and interested individuals. A public scoping session for the project was held on October 26, 2017 in conjunction with a Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB) meeting, as well as on November 2, 2017 in conjunction with a Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) meeting. Comments received by the City on the NOP either in writing or verbally at the public scoping sessions were considered during the preparation of the Draft EIR. Written NOP comments were received from East Bay Municipal Utility District, the Native American Heritage Commission, and one individual. The NOP and comment letters are included in Appendix B of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR was published on April 17, 2018 and distributed to applicable local and State agencies. Copies of the Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR (NOA) were mailed to all individuals previously requesting to be notified of the Draft EIR, in addition to those agencies and individuals who received a copy of the NOP. 1 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR AUGUST 2018 I. INTRODUCTION RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The 45-day public comment period for the Draft EIR began on April 17, 2018 and ended on June 1, 2018. Two public hearings were held regarding the Draft EIR during the 45-day public comment period: the LPC on May 3, 2018 and the ZAB on May 24, 2018. One member of the public and five LPC commissioners provided verbal comments during the May 3rd hearing. Two members of the ZAB provided verbal comments during the May 24th hearing. Written comments were received from two agencies and two individuals. Written responses to all the comments received regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR are provided in Chapter III, Comments and Responses, of this document. C. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This RTC document consists of the following chapters: Chapter I: Introduction. This chapter discusses the purpose and organization of this RTC document and the Final EIR, and summarizes the environmental review process for the project. Chapter II: List of Commenting Agencies, Organizations, and Individuals. This chapter contains a list of agencies, organizations, and persons who submitted written comments or spoke at the public hearing on the Draft EIR during the public review period. Chapter III: Comments and Responses. This chapter contains reproductions of all comment letters received on the Draft EIR as well as a summary of the verbal comments provided at the public hearing. A written response for each comment related to the adequacy of the Draft EIR received during the public review period is provided. Each response is keyed to the preceding comment. Chapter IV: Text Revisions. Corrections to the Draft EIR necessary in light of the comments received and responses provided, or necessary to amplify or clarify material in the Draft EIR, are contained in this chapter. Text with double underline represents language that has been added to the Draft EIR; text with strikeout has been deleted from the Draft EIR. Revisions to figures are also provided, where appropriate. 2 LIST OF COMMENTING AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS This chapter presents a list of letters and comments received during the public review period of the Draft EIR and describes the organization of the letters and comments that are included in Chapter III, Comments and Responses, of this document. A. ORGANIZATION OF COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES During the 45-day comment period, which ended on June 1, 2018, the City received written comments from two agencies and two individuals and verbal comments from four LPC commissioners, two ZAB members, and one individual. This RTC document includes a reproduction of each written comment letter (or email) in its entirety received on the Draft EIR and a summary of comments made at the public hearing before the LPC and ZAB. Written responses to each comment are provided. The comment letters are numbered consecutively following the A, B, and C designations. The letters are annotated in the margin according to the following code: State, Local and Regional Agencies: A# Individuals and Organizations: B# Landmarks Preservation Commission and Zoning Adjustments Board: C# The following agencies and individuals provided written or verbal comments. State, Local, and Regional Agencies A1 East Bay Municipal Utility District May 29, 2018 A2 Alameda County Transportation Commission June 1, 2018 Individuals and Organizations B1 Lozeau Drury LLC May 25, 2018 B2 Wendel Rosen Black and Dean LLC June 1, 2018 Landmarks Preservation Commission C1-1 Chairperson Steven Finacom May 3, 2018 C1-2 Commissioner Phil Allen May 3, 2018 C1-3 Commissioner Christopher Adams May 3, 2018 C1-4 Commissioner Becky O’Malley May 3, 2018 C1-5 John English May 3, 2018 3 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR AUGUST 2018 II. LIST OF COMMENTING AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, & INDIVIDUALS RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Zoning Adjustments Board C1-6 Board Member John Selawsky May 24, 2018 C1-7 Board Member Patrick Sheahan May 24, 2018 4 III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Written responses to all comments on the Draft EIR are provided in this section. Letters received on the Draft EIR are provided in their entirety. Each letter is immediately followed by a response keyed to the specific comment. 5 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR AUGUST 2018 III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 6 AUGUST 2018 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES A. STATE, LOCAL, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES 7 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR AUGUST 2018 III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 8 AUGUST 2018 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Letter A1 1 9 BANCROFT PROJECT – 2580 BANCROFT EIR AUGUST 2018 III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Letter A1 cont.