Commission De L'environnement De Bruxelles Et Environs Asbl
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Streszczenie Ekologiczne Aspekty Interakcji Galasotwórczych
Streszczenie Ekologiczne aspekty interakcji galasotwórczych pryszczarków Hartigiola annulipes i Mikiola fagi z bukiem Fagus sylvatica Niniejsza praca poświęcona została ekologicznym zależnościom między bukiem zwyczajnym a owadami tworzącym galasy na liściach. Galasy jako struktury, których rozwój i wzrost indukowany jest przez wybrane grupy bezkręgowców, stanowią obciążenie dla roślinnego gospodarza. Jedną z najbogatszych w gatunki zdolne do tworzenia wyrośli grup owadów stanowią pryszczarki (Cecidomyiidae; Diptera). Dwa badane gatunki pryszczarków: garnusznica bukowa (Mikiola fagi) i hartigiolówka bukowa (Hartigiola annulipes), mimo podobnego cyklu życiowego i takiego samego gospodarza, tworzą odmienne morfologicznie galasy. W niniejszej rozprawie wykazano, że garnusznica bukowa wraz ze wzrostem długości blaszki liścia buka ma tendencję do indukcji mniejszej liczby galasów. Co więcej, im więcej galasów na liściu, tym większa szansa na wystąpienie reakcji nadwrażliwej ze strony gospodarza. Zależność ta dotyczy zarówno garnusznicy, jak i hartigiolówki, reakcja nadwrażliwa odpowiedzialna jest za odpowiednio 40% i 51% śmiertelności galasów, i nie zależy od wielkości liścia. W przypadku drugiego wymienionego gatunku, większe liście charakteryzują się nieznacznie większą liczebnością galasów. Hartigiolówka wykazuje niewielkie preferencje wobec liści zwróconych na wschód, unika zaś te o wystawie południowej, ponadto częściej indukuje galasy w środkowej części liścia, a najrzadziej w dystalnej. W zależności od wybranej strefy liścia zmienia się -
Estudi De Les Gales De La Coŀlecció Vilarrúbia Dipositada Al Museu De Ciències Naturals De Barcelona
Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d’Història Natural, 81: 137-173. 2017 ISSN 2013-3987 (online edition): ISSN: 1133-6889 (print edition)137 GEA, FLORA ET fauna GEA, FLORA ET FAUNA Estudi de les gales de la coŀlecció Vilarrúbia dipositada al Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona Maria Blanes-Dalmau*, Berta Caballero-López* & Juli Pujade-Villar** * Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona. Laboratori de Natura. Coŀlecció d’artròpodes. Passeig Picasso s/n. 08003 Barcelona. A/e: [email protected] ** Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat de Biologia. Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals (Secció invertebrats). Diagonal, 643. 08028 Barcelona (Catalunya). A/e: [email protected] Correspondència autor: Maria Blanes. A/e: [email protected] Rebut: 05.11.2017; Acceptat: 24.11.2017; Publicat: 28.12.2017 Resum La coŀlecció de gales d’Antoni Vilarrúbia i Garet, dipositada al Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, ha estat revisada, documen- tada i fotografiada. Està representada per 884 gales que pertanyen a 194 espècies diferents d’agents cecidògens incloent-hi insectes, àcars, fongs i proteobacteris. Els hostes dels agents cecidògens de la coŀlecció estudiada es troben representats per 114 espècies diferents, agrupa- des en 36 famílies, que inclouen formes arbòries, arbustives i herbàcies, on els òrgans vegetals més afectats són les fulles i els borrons. La coŀlecció Vilarrúbia és una mostra ben clara de la diversitat de cecidis que tenim a Catalunya. Paraules clau: gales, fitocecídies zoocecídies, Vilarrúbia, MCNB. Abstract Study of the galls of the Vilarrúbia collection deposited at the Museum of Natural Sciences of Barcelona The gall collection of Antoni Vilarrúbia i Garet deposited in the Barcelona Natural History Museum was reviewed, documented and photographed. -
List of Species Observed Along the Riverbank Between GARRICK's
HURST PARK 15th and 17th August 2015 ‐ list of species observed along the riverbank between GARRICK’S AIT ‐ TAGG’S ISLAND PLANTS Hirschfeldia incana common Acer negundo near tow path, car park area Hypericum perforatum local Acer platanoides young trees Hypericum x inodorum? Frequent along Acer pseudoplatanus trees & saplings along riverbank river bank Hypochaeris radicata near car park Achillea millefolium frequent Ilex aquifolium sapling Aesculus hippocastanum trees & saplings Impatiens glandulifera local by riverbank Agrimonia eupatoria a few Iris pseudacorus river bank, local Alliaria petiolata scattered Lactuca serriola near car park Allium vineale a few Lamium album occasional Alnus glutinosa trees, riverbank Lathyrus pratensis frequent Anthriscus sylvestris scattered Ligustrum ovalifolium sapling on riverbank Arctium minus scattered Lolium pratense common Artemisia vulgaris scattered Lotus corniculatus occasional Arum maculatum few Lycopus europaeus local Ballota nigra fairly frequent Lythrum salicaria local Bellis perennis scattered Malus domestica small tree Betula pendula near tow path, car park area Malva moschata scarce, by river bank Buddleia davidii a few Malva sylvestris occasional Calystegia sepium sensu stricto frequent Medicago arabica scattered Capsella bursa‐pastoris scarce Medicago lupulina scattered Carex sp. (no flower spikes) river bank Melilotus sp. (no flowers, needs checking) Centaurea nigra frequent Odontites verna local Chenopodium album scattered Oenanthe crocata riverbank, local/frequent Cirsium arvense -
Tarset and Greystead Biological Records
Tarset and Greystead Biological Records published by the Tarset Archive Group 2015 Foreword Tarset Archive Group is delighted to be able to present this consolidation of biological records held, for easy reference by anyone interested in our part of Northumberland. It is a parallel publication to the Archaeological and Historical Sites Atlas we first published in 2006, and the more recent Gazeteer which both augments the Atlas and catalogues each site in greater detail. Both sets of data are also being mapped onto GIS. We would like to thank everyone who has helped with and supported this project - in particular Neville Geddes, Planning and Environment manager, North England Forestry Commission, for his invaluable advice and generous guidance with the GIS mapping, as well as for giving us information about the archaeological sites in the forested areas for our Atlas revisions; Northumberland National Park and Tarset 2050 CIC for their all-important funding support, and of course Bill Burlton, who after years of sharing his expertise on our wildflower and tree projects and validating our work, agreed to take this commission and pull everything together, obtaining the use of ERIC’s data from which to select the records relevant to Tarset and Greystead. Even as we write we are aware that new records are being collected and sites confirmed, and that it is in the nature of these publications that they are out of date by the time you read them. But there is also value in taking snapshots of what is known at a particular point in time, without which we have no way of measuring change or recognising the hugely rich biodiversity of where we are fortunate enough to live. -
Fagus Sylvatica)
BALTIC FORESTRY GALL ABUNDANCE AND LEAF SIZE AS FACTORS AFFECTING /.../ S. PILICHOWSKI AND M.J. GIERTYCH Gall Abundance and Leaf Size as Factors Affect- ing the Hypersensitive Reaction in the Common Beech (Fagus sylvatica) SEBASTIAN PILICHOWSKI1* AND MARIAN J. GIERTYCH1,2 1University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Biological Sciences; Z. Szafrana 1, Zielona Góra 65-516, Poland 2Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Dendrology; Parkowa 5, 62-035 Kórnik, Poland *Corresponding author (email: [email protected]) Pilichowski, S. and Giertych, M. J. 2017. Gall Abundance and Leaf Size as Factors Affecting the Hypersensitive Reaction in the Common Beech (Fagus sylvatica). Baltic Forestry 23(3): 608611. Abstract Plant galls being abnormal growths can alter the hypersensitive reaction (HR), a defensive mechanism that is supposed to kill pathogens, parasites and all other alien organisms, including gall-inducers. The aim of the study was to find an answer to the question, whether leaves of different size react similarly to a various number of galls of Mikiola fagi and Hartigiola annulipes. Leaves (3,179 with 7,011 galls of H. annulipes and 482 with 637 galls of M. fagi) from seven localities, including two nature reserves, were collected in western Poland in 2014. Analyses conducted as the logistic regression test showed that the HR in large leaves as reaction against H. annulipes was more often (but not statistically significant) than in small leaves. This trend was not observed in the case of M. fagi while there was no relationship between the HR and the leaf size for M. fagi. However, the linear regression test for both species showed a relationship between HR occurrence and the number of galls on the leaf blade. -
Index to Cecidology up to Vol. 31 (2016)
Index to Cecidology Up to Vol. 31 (2016) This index has been based on the contents of the papers rather than on their actual titles in order to facilitate the finding of papers on particular subjects. The figures following each entry are the year of publication, the volume and, in brackets, the number of the relevant issue. Aberbargoed Grasslands: report of 2011 field meeting 2012 27 (1) Aberrant Plantains 99 14(2) Acacia species galled by Fungi in India 2014 29(2) Acer gall mites (with illustrations) 2013 28(1) Acer galls: felt galls re-visited 2005 20(2) Acer saccharinum – possibly galled by Dasineura aceris new to Britain 2017 32(1) Acer seed midge 2009 24(1) Aceria anceps new to Ireland 2005 20 (1) Aceria geranii from North Wales 1999 14(2) Aceria heteronyx galling twigs of Norway Maple 2014 29(1) Aceria ilicis (gall mite) galling holm oak flowers in Brittany 1997 12(1) In Ireland 2010 25(1) Aceria mites on sycamore 2005 20(2) Aceria populi galling aspen in Scotland 2000 15(2) Aceria pterocaryae new to the British mite fauna 2008 23(2) Aceria rhodiolae galling roseroot 2013 28(1): 2016 31(1) Aceria rhodiolae in West Sutherland 2014 29(1) Aceria tristriata on Walnut 2007 22(2) Acericecis campestre sp. nov. on Field Maple 2004 19(2) Achillea ptarmica (sneezewort) galled by Macrosiphoniella millefolii 1993 8(2) Acorn galls on red oak 2014 29(1) Acorn stalks: peculiar elongation 2002 17(2) Aculops fuchsiae – a fuchsia-galling mite new to Britain 2008 23 (1) Aculus magnirostris new to Ireland 2005 20 (1) Acumyia acericola – the Acer seed -
Species Common Name Type of Causer Host
Species Common Name Type of Causer Host Locations JH New Host Gen etc What3Words Grid Ref Acalitus brevitarsus Mite - - WP 15/07/2017 Alder Only few galls found TQ 41749 87181 Acalitus stenaspis Beech leaf roll mite Mite - - RW 15/07/2017 Beech Only few galls found (Reservoir Wood) tribune.acted.finest TQ 40735 87259 Aceria artemisiae Mite - - OSW 15/07/2017 Mugwort Several specimens found in OSW TQ 42257 87053 Aceria cephalonea Acer gall mite Mite - - BW 24/06/2017 Sycamore Common across patch TQ 40364 87404 Aceria erinea Mite Walnut Wanstead Park 11/06/2010 WF 08/07/2017 Walnut Galls found on both walnut tree specimens on Wanstead Flats TQ 41740 86164 Aceria fraxinivora Mite - - WP 24/06/2017 Ash Common especially on mature Ash on patch TQ 41701 87169 Aceria genistae Mite Broom Wanstead Park 02/08/2011 Aceria ilicis Mite Holm Oak City of London Cemetery, 05/03/2013 BW 17/06/2017 Holm Oak Several specimens found TQ 40020 87562 Aceria lateannulatus Mite Lime Wanstead Park 04/07/2005 Aceria macrochela Mite Field Maple Wanstead Flats, 25/08/2011 WF 08/07/2017 Field Maple A few specimens near Changing rooms by Cat and Dog TQ 39763 86462 Aceria macrorhynchus Mite Sycamore Wanstead Park, 11/06/2010 Aceria myriadeum Mite Field Maple - WF 17/06/2017 Field Maple Specimens found in Bush Wood TQ 40340 87381 Aceria nervisequa Beech felt gall Mite Beech - WP 18/06/2017 Beech Specimens found in Wanstead Park TQ 41974 87302 Aceria tenella Mite - - RW 24/06/2017 Hornbeam Only a couple of specimens found in Reservoir Wood TQ 40494 87201 Aceria ulmicola -
Gall-Inducing Insects and Plants: the Induction Conundrum
REVIEW ARTICLE Gall-inducing insects and plants: the induction conundrum Anantanarayanan Raman* CSIRO (Health and Biosecurity), Underwood Avenue, Floreat Park, WA 6014 & Charles Sturt University, PO Box 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia rizes what is currently known in the induction of galls, Galls induced by insects and mites (insects, hereafter) have been a subject of interest to insect ecologists simultaneously pointing to the many gaping holes in that because of the unusual habit of gall induction and for knowledge and the areas that need to be focused upon. their tightly connected relationships. These specialist Galls induced by insects (hereafter ‘galls’) exemplify 12–14 insects and mites have been explored to explain the defined plant growth . Plant-growth regulators (PGRs) nature of interactions between them and the plants by were implicated as the key. Nysterakis15,16 demonstrated entomologists, ecologists and plant physiologists over auxins in the salivary extracts of gall-inducing Daktulos- the last two centuries. However, the questions why phaira vitifoliae (Phylloxeridae) on Vitis vinifera (Vita- only certain insect taxa induce galls on specific species ceae) and leaf curl-inducing Brachycaudus helichrysi of plants and how galls are induced remain challeng- (Aphididae) on Prunus domestica var. domestica (Rosa- ing. Whereas several efforts made across the world ceae) by testing with the oat–coleoptile and vine–tendril– implicate plant-growth regulators (PGRs) in answer- spin tests, popular in the 1940s. The inhibitory and hyper- ing the question on how galls are induced, this article emphasizes the establishment of a metaplasied cell at trophic effects on plants with salivary-extract injections were clarified as due to variations in auxin levels17,18. -
Parrotia Persica) Over the Last 3 Million Years
Structures des paléoforêts européennes de la fin du Cénozoïque : apport des interactions plante-insecte Benjamin Adroit To cite this version: Benjamin Adroit. Structures des paléoforêts européennes de la fin du Cénozoïque : apport des in- teractions plante-insecte. Biodiversité et Ecologie. Université Montpellier; Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie (Bonn), 2018. Français. NNT : 2018MONTG008. tel-01815989 HAL Id: tel-01815989 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01815989 Submitted on 14 Jun 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER En EERGP - Écologie, Evolution, Ressources Génétique, Paléobiologie École doctorale GAIA - Biodiversité, Agriculture, Alimentation, Environnement, Terre, Eau Unité de recherche Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier UMR 5554 Structures des paléoforêts Européennes de la fin du Cénozoïque : apport des interactions plante-insecte Présentée par Benjamin ADROIT 0DUV 2018 Sous la direction de Jean-Frédéric TERRAL de l’Université de Montpellier et Torsten WAPPLER de l’Université de Bonn Devant le jury composé de Mme. Brigitte MEYER-BERTHAUD, Directrice de recherche, Université de Montpellier Présidente du jury M. Dieter UHL, apl. Professeur, Senckenberg Research Institute Frankfurt am Main Rapporteur M. -
Species List 21/11/2014 1
Dams To Darnley CP Species List 21/11/2014 1 Group Species Common Name Earliest Latest No. Recs acarine (mite) Aceria nalepai 2006 2006 1 acarine (mite) Aceria populi 2010 2010 1 acarine (mite) Eriophyes inangulis 2006 2006 1 acarine (mite) Eriophyes laevis 2008 2008 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 1998 2013 14 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2010 2013 12 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2010 2010 3 amphibian Rana temporaria Common Frog 1996 2013 58 annelid Erpobdellidae leech 2005 2005 1 annelid Oligochaeta a worm 2005 2005 1 bird Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 1992 2014 13 bird Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper 1957 2014 8 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 1993 2004 7 bird Alauda arvensis Skylark 2003 2004 3 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 1993 2014 22 bird Anas acuta Pintail 1983 1983 1 bird Anas crecca Teal 2003 2013 20 bird Anas penelope Wigeon 1998 2013 11 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 1997 2013 54 bird Anas querquedula Garganey 1982 1982 1 bird Anas strepera Gadwall 1979 2013 15 bird Anser anser Greylag Goose 2004 2004 2 bird Anthus pratensis Meadow Pipit 1982 2013 3 bird Anthus trivialis Tree Pipit 1992 1992 1 bird Apus apus Swift 1982 2014 11 bird Apus melba Alpine Swift 1992 1992 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 1990 2014 52 bird Arenaria interpres Turnstone 1911 1981 4 bird Asio otus Long-eared Owl 2004 2004 1 bird Aythya ferina Pochard 2003 2004 11 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 1999 2013 66 bird Aythya marila Scaup 1900 2013 12 Dams To Darnley CP Species List 21/11/2014 2 Group Species Common Name Earliest Latest No. -
Bioblitz Report Draft 2010 Vs 2
Leicestershire 2010 Watermead Country Park th st 30 – 31 May 2010 Dr Helen O’Brien Dr Catherine Tregaskes Table of Contents Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………. ii Executive Summary ......................................................................... 1 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Introduction to Bioblitz …………………………………………………………… 2 1.2 Partners in Bioblitz ………………………………………………………………. 3 1.3 Publicity …………………………………………………………………………… 3 1.4 Funding …………………………………………………………………………… 4 1.5 Participation ………………………………………………………………………. 4 1.6 Displays and Information ………………………………………………………... 5 2 Watermead Country Park ……………………………………………... 6 3 Participation …………………………………………………………….. 8 3.1 Public Involvement and Wildlife Recording …………………………………… 8 3.2 Guided Walks …………………………………………………………………… 9 3.3 Naturalists and Experienced Surveyors ……………………………………… 10 3.3.1 Recording Forms and Site Maps ………………………………………………. 10 3.3.2 Accuracy of Information and Verification 10 3.3.3 Surveying Techniques ……………………………………………………..……. 11 4 Results ………………………………………………………………….. 12 4.1 Public Participation ………………………………………………………………. 12 4.2 Results – Overall for the Park ………………………………………………….. 13 5 Analysis ………………………………………………………………….. 16 5.1 Public Participation ………………………………………………………………. 16 5.2 Duplication of Records in North and South of Watermead Country Park …. 16 6 Discussion ………………………………………………………………. 19 6.1 Public Participation ………………………………………………………………. 19 6.2 Species Groups ………………………………………………………………….. 20 6.2.1 Birds ……………………………………………………………………………….. 20 6.2.2 Invertebrates ……………………………………………………………………… -
Contribution À La Connaissance Des Galles D'eriophyides Du Luxembourg
Bull. Soc. Nat. luxemb. 101 (2001) p. 75-97 Contribution à la connaissance des galles d’Eriophyides du Luxembourg (Acari, Eriophyidae) par Jacques LAMBINON 1), Nico SCHNEIDER 2) & Fernand FEITZ 3) Zusammenfassung: Im Beitrag werden 47 Gallmilbenarten genannt sowie deren im Grossherzogtum Luxemburg nachgewiesene Gallen vorgestellt und deren Fundorte aufgezählt. Bei 40 Arten handelt es sich um Erstnachweise für Luxemburg. 1. Introduction Les zoocécidies du grand-duché de Luxembourg sont très mal connues et seules quelques données occasionnelles ont été publiées, essentiellement dans les années 1950. L’un de nous (J.L.), intéressé par les galles de Belgique et des régions voisines, a continué à récolter de temps à autre de telles galles lors de journées d’herborisation au Luxembourg. Le deuxième auteur de ce travail (N.S.) a entrepris depuis quelques années un inventaire des galles du pays, avec l’aide de collègues entomologistes, dont surtout le troisième auteur du présent rapport. Cette première contribution sera, nous l’espérons, suivie d’autres portant sur les galles causées par les divers groupes d’animaux cécidogènes. Elle concerne les déformations dues à des Eriophyides, celles-ci allant de taches pileuses (érinoses) à de véritables cécidies. Les Eriophyides sont des Acariens minuscules, vermiformes et aveugles qui ne portent que deux paires de pattes locomotrices (g. 1). Leurs chélicères sont en forme de stylets capables de percer des cellules végétales et d’en aspirer le hyaloplasme. De nombreuses espèces sont gallicoles. En général les cécidies sont produites par la plante en réaction à l’injection de salive toxique au moment de la prise de nourriture (Docters van Leeuwen 1982, Alford et al.