Engineerii{G and Planning for Remote Communities in Northern Canada
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TOOLS FOR RESULTS-BASED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERII{G AND PLANNING FOR REMOTE COMMUNITIES IN NORTHERN CANADA BY CRYSTAL ISAACS, B. Sc., EIT A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Civil Engineering University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba @ 2005 THE UNTVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ***** COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Tools for Results-Based Transportation Engineering and Planning for Remote Communities in Northem Canada BY Crystal Isaacs, B. Sc., EIT A ThesislPracticum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree of Master of Science Crystal Isaacs, B. Sc., EIT O 2005 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilms Inc. to pubtish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made availabte by authorify of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express wriffen authorization from the copyright owner. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to develop a set of tools to facilitate results-based transportation engineering and planning for remote communities in northern Canada. The geographic scope of the research encompasses northem Manitoba and the Kivalliq region of Nunavut. The tools are designed to address national issues specific to the roles and responsibilities of Transport Canada. They offer a pragmatic approach to northern transport engineering, planning and decision-making because they can be implemented individually or collectively. The thesis: (1) selects, defines and adapts a theoretical framework for transport systems analysis; (2) develops a comprehensive, interoperable, synthesized and user-friendly GIS- T anal¡ical platform; (3) identifies results-based indicators to measure the performance of the northern transportation system with respect to national transportation goals and objectives; and (4) defines an associated evaluation methodology. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my advisor Professor Alan Clayton for his guidance and encouragement throughout my master's program and the course of this research. Professors at the University of Manitoba, including Dr. Jearmette Montufar, Dr. Ian Skelton and Dr. Thomas Henley also contributed to the completion of this research. I would also like to thank Transport Canada, and in particular Mr. Mike Shumsky and Mr. Marc Conrad from Coordination and Policy Advice, Prairie and Northern Region. Financial support for this research was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council G\ISERC). I also gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Mr. Grant Forsman (Intergraph Canada), Mr. Tim Hague (Fast Air) and my friends and colleagues at UMTIG. Finally, I would like to thank my husband, Andrew, who is a constant support and encouragement. To my family and friends who have helped and supported me in many different ways I also express my appreciation. TABLE OF CONTENTS A8STRACT............... ............... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ......iii LIST OF TABLES ............ ..... vi LIST OF FIGURES ............... ................. vii CHAPTER 1............... ............. I 1.1. THE RESEARCH .................... 1 1.2. BACKGROLTND AND NEED.............. ...................... 1 1.3. OBJECTIVES............ ..............6 1.4. SCOPE AND OTHER RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONS............................ 6 1.5. THESTS ORGANIZATTON..... ..................7 CHAPTER 2............... ............. 9 2.1. DELINEATION OF CANADA'S NORTHERN REGION ..........9 2.2. DEFINTTION OF REMOTE. ...................12 2.2.1. Criteria for Remoteness Designation ............ 12 2.2.2. Recommendations from the Literature .........14 2.2.3. ProposedCommunityClassificationSystem. .................15 2.3. GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE AND ANALYSIS TINITS ................... i6 2.3.1. Geographic Analysis Units ......... 16 2.3.2. Geographic Scope .....1j CHAPTER 3 3.1. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK......... ....................20 3.1.1. The Transportation System (T). .. ... .........22 3.1.2. The Demand System (D) .... .. ...................23 3.1.3. The Flow System (F) ..... ...... ......23 3.2. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK... ..........24 3.2.1. Definitions .................24 3.2.2. Software ....................25 3.2.3. GIS-T Platform .........26 3.3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIS-T PLATFORM ......27 3.3.1. Interoperability Issues .................27 3.3.2. Data Processing and Spatial Analysis... ........28 3.3.3. Creation of Spatial Datasets.... ......................29 llt 3.4. INTEGRATION OF THEORETICAL AND ANALYTICAL CONCEPTS 29 3.4.1 . Base Map Spatial Features and Attribute Information ..................... 30 3.4.2. Transportation System Spatial Features and Attribute Information.32 3.4.3. Demand System Spatial Features and Attribute Information........... 34 3.4.4. Flow System Attribute Information............... .................36 CHAPTER 4............... ...........37 4.r. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM .......,.....37 4.1.1. Surface Transportation............ ...................... 39 4.1.2. All-Weather Roads..... .................41 4.1.3. Winter Road Network.............. .....................41 4.1.4. Climate Change Impacts .............43 4.1.5. Rail Network.............. .................46 4.1.6. Air Transportation..... ..................49 4.1.7. Marine Transportation ............ ...................... 56 4.2. DEMAND SYSTEM .............6I 4.2.1. Ethnic Origin....... ......61 4.2.2. Population .................62 4.2.3. Levels of Education ............... .....64 4.2.4. Employment Characteristics .......65 4.2.5. Demand System Implications for Northern Transportation..... .........69 4.3. FLOW SYSTEM.. ..................7r 4.3.1. Airport Activity.... .....71 4.3.2. Northern Manitoba Ferry Traffic ..................73 4.3.3. Kivalliq Region Marine Traffic ....................75 4.3.4. Northern Manitoba Freight Traffic ...............76 4.3.5. Manitoba Highway Traffic Information System...... .......77 CHAPTER 5 5.1. EVOLUTION OF NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN CANADA .............79 5.2. HISTORICAL APPROACH TO NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION POLICY ...............80 5.3. VISION FOR NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN CANADA 86 5.3.1. Recommendations of the CTA Review Panel ................ 86 5.3.2. Straight Ahead .......... 88 5.4. KEY GOALS OF NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION POLICY................. 90 CHAPTER 6............... ........... 9r 6.1. TERMINOLOGY ..................91 IV 6.2. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR A RESULTS-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR NORTHERN CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION... 93 6.2.1. Implementation of a Results-Based System ...................94 6.2.2. Selection Criteria for Performance Indicators .................................. 95 6.2.3. Additional Considerations .......... ..................96 6.3. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF RESULTS-BASED FRAMEWORKS 97 6.3.1. Monitoring ................98 6.3.2. Evaluation .................99 6.4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR NORTHERN CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION .......... 101 6.4.1. Accessibility.............. ................ 102 6.4.2. Economic Viability and System Efficiency .................. 104 6.4.3. Regional Economic Development.............. .................. 105 6.4.4. Safety .... 108 6.4.5. Equity .... 109 6.4.6. Sustainability............. ................ l1t 6.5. PROPOSED EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ................,...112 CHAPTER 7 7.1. DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIS-T PLATFORM .... 116 7.2. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ............117 7.3. APPLICATION OF THE RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK......... ........... 119 7.4. CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING A RESULTS- BASED APPROACH .............. .............. t20 7.5. CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH......... .........123 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Socioeconomic Criteria for Designating Remote Communities ..................... 13 Table 2.2: Geographical Criteria for Designating Remote Communities............. ............14 Table 2.3: Total North and North Transition Zone Coverage in the Study Area ......... ....17 Table 2.4: Community Remoteness Classifications ........... ..........17 Table 3.1: Base Map Spatial and Attribute Information............ ..................... 3l Table 3.2: Transportation System Spatial and Attribute Information...............................33 Table 3.3: Demand System Spatial and Attribute Information.............. .........34 Table 3.4: Demand System Attributes ......35 Table 4.1: Transportation Modes and LOA in Special Access Communities ............. .....39 Table 4.2: Travel Distances by Rail (km). ....... ..........47 Table 4.3: Rail Passenger Transport Options between Thompson and Churchlll ............47 Table 4.4: Rail Passenger Transport Options between The Pas and Pukatawagan ..........48 Table 4.5: Adult Passenger Rail Fares ......4B Table 4.6: Northern Manitoba Ferry Infrastructure.............. ........57 Table 4.7: Vessels used in Northern Manitoba Ferry Operations........ ...........57 Table 4.8: South Indian Lake and York Landing Ferry Schedules.. ............... 58 Table 4.9: Kivalliq Region Marine Facilities... ........... 59 Table 4.10: NSSI2005 Sealift Cargo