DOCSLIB.ORG

OSI Layers in Automotive Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OSI Layers in Automotive Networks OSI Layers in Automotive Networks OSI Layers in Automotive Networks 2013-03-20 IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando Aboubacar Diarra, Robert Bosch GmbH 1 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Outline OSI Reference Model Simplified generic Architecture for Automotive Serial Busses Basic Automotive E/E Architecture Automotive Bus Systems in the OSI Model Ethernet Impact on Automotive Bus Layering 2 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks OSI Reference Model ECU 2 ECU 1 Data Application A Application B Application Protocol 7 Application 7 Application 6 Presentation 3 relevant Layers for 6 Presentation 5 Session Automotive Control Data 5 Session Communication with Area 4 Transport Busses: Layers 1, 2 and 7 4 Transport 3 Network 3 Network Communication Protocol 2 Data Link 2 Data Link Bit Transmission Protocol 1 Physical 1 Physical Transmission Medium 3 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Simplified generic Architecture for Automotive Serial Busses Bus Node Bus Node Application Application Layer 7 Communication Communication Communication Communication Controller Communication Protocol Controller Layer 1, 2 Transceiver Physical Layer Definition Transceiver Layer 1 BUS 4 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Basic Automotive E/E Architecture Diagnosis over CAN Layer 4 * Central Gateway CAN FlexRay MOST LIN High speed CAN Layer 1, 2, 4* Layer 1, 2, 4* Layer 1, 2, 4* Layer 1 to 7 * Layer 4 is used in this case for Diagnosis Services 5 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Automotive Bus Systems in the OSI Model: Example of the CAN Bus . Logical Link Control (LLC) Acceptance Filtering 7 Application Overload Notification Recovery Management 6 Presentation . Medium Access control(MAC) Data Encapsulation/Decapsulation 5 Session Frame Coding Error Detection/Signaling/Handling 4 Transport . Physical Signaling (PLS) 3 Network Bit Encoding/Decoding Bit Time Synchronization 2 Data Link . Physical Medium attachment(PMA) Driver/Receiver Characteristics .Media Dependant Interface(MDI) 1 Physical Connectors 6 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Automotive Bus Systems in the OSI Model: Example of the FlexRay Bus 7 Application . Logical Link Control (LLC) 6 Presentation Protocol Operation Control . Medium Access control(MAC) 5 Session Message Framing Communication Cycle 4 Transport . Physical Signaling (PLS) 3 Network Bit Encoding/Decoding Bit Time Synchronization 2 Data Link . Physical Medium attachment(PMA) Driver/Receiver Characteristics .Media Dependant Interface(MDI) 1 Physical Connectors 7 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Automotive Bus Systems in the OSI Model: Example of the MOST Bus 7 Application Application Programming Interface 6 Presentation Netservices Layer 2 5 Session 4 Transport Netservices Layer 1 3 Network 2 Data Link MOST Transceiver 1 Physical Electrical PHY, FOT’s Connectors and Plastic Fiber 8 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Ethernet Impact on Automotive Bus Layering: Example of On-Board Communication * Remark: Central Layer 3 and 4 can be Gateway solicited for Car2X Communication Applications. Switch CAN FlexRay LIN High speed CAN Ethernet Layer 2 * Excepted On-Board Diagnosis (OBD) which needs a Layer 4 support 9 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Ethernet Impact on Automotive Bus Layering: Example of Off-Board Communication Diagnosis Layer 3 / 4 over IP (DoIP) Central Gateway Switch CAN FlexRay LIN High speed CAN Ethernet Layer 3 / 4 Layer 4 10 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Conclusion(1) In reference to the OSI Data Communication Model, the Serial Interface of CAN, FlexRay and LIN Busses typically needs 3 OSI Layers for On- Board Communication excepted OBD: the Physical Layer, the Data Link Layer and the Application Layer The MOST Bus covers all the 7 OSI Layers for On-Board Communication The Transport Layer is used for Off-Board Communication like Diagnosis and also for OBD on these typical Automotive Area Networks. The Layers 3 and 4 can be used for Vehicle On-Board Communication in Car2X Communication Applications 11 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Conclusion(2) Therefore, for a Control Data Communication that occurs in an In- vehicle closed Network, the need of the Layer 2 is justified. On top of that, Layer 3 Routing Processes require more infrastructure (eg. IP stack implementation, software implementation, memory need . .) and costs investments than Layer 2 solutions from an Automotive Perspective For In-vehicle Control Applications which require a very low Latency, a Layer 2 solution is more pragmatic than a Layer 3 solution However, Diagnosis over IP, Car2X and In-Car Wireless Communication Applications need Layer 3 Routing Support 12 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando OSI Layers in Automotive Networks Thank You for your Attention 13 2013-03-20 - IEEE 802.1 Plenary Meeting - Orlando .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Data Communication and Computer Network Unit 1
    Department of Collegiate Education GOVERNMENT FIRST GRADE COLLEGE RAIBAG-591317 Department of Computer Science Lecture Notes SUBJECT : DATA COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS SUBJECT CODE : 17BScCST61 CLASS : BSC VI Sem Paper-1 Subject In charge Smt Bhagirathi Halalli Assistant Professor 2019-20 Data Communication and Computer Network Unit 1 Unit 1: Introduction Content: 1.1. Data communications, 1.2. Networks, 1.3. The internet, 1.4. Protocols and standards, 1.5. Network models – OSI model, 1.6. TCP/IP protocol suite, 1.7. Addressing. 1.1.Data Communications, Data refers to the raw facts that are collected while information refers to processed data that enables us to take decisions. Ex. When result of a particular test is declared it contains data of all students, when you find the marks you have scored you have the information that lets you know whether you have passed or failed. The word data refers to any information which is presented in a form that is agreed and accepted upon by is creators and users. Data Communication Data Communication is a process of exchanging data or information In case of computer networks this exchange is done between two devices over a transmission medium. This process involves a communication system which is made up of hardware and software. The hardware part involves the sender and receiver devices and the intermediate devices through which the data passes. The software part involves certain rules which specify what is to be communicated, how it is to be communicated and when. It is also called as a Protocol. The following sections describe the fundamental characteristics that are important for the effective working of data communication process and are followed by the components that make up a data communications system.
    [Show full text]
  • The OSI Model
    Data Encapsulation & OSI & TCP/IP Models Week 2 Lecturer: Lucy White [email protected] Office : 324 1 Network Protocols • A protocol is a formal description of a set of rules and conventions that govern a particular aspect of how devices on a network communicate. Protocols determine the format, timing, sequencing, flow control and error control in data communication. Without protocols, the computer cannot make or rebuild the stream of incoming bits from another computer into the original format. • Protocols control all aspects of data communication, which include the following: - How the physical network is built - How computers connect to the network - How the data is formatted for transmission - The setting up and termination of data transfer sessions - How that data is sent - How to deal with errors 2 Protocol Suites & Industry Standard • Many of the protocols that comprise a protocol suite reference other widely utilized protocols or industry standards • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) or the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) • The use of standards in developing and implementing protocols ensures that products from different manufacturers can work together for efficient communications 3 Function of Protocol in Network Communication A standard is a process or protocol that has been endorsed by the networking industry and ratified by a standards organization 4 Protocol Suites TCP/IP Protocol Suite and Communication Function of Protocol in Network Communication 6 Function of Protocol in Network Communication • Technology independent Protocols -Many diverse types of devices can communicate using the same sets of protocols. This is because protocols specify network functionality, not the underlying technology to support this functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport Layer: Tutorial and Survey SAMI IREN and PAUL D
    The Transport Layer: Tutorial and Survey SAMI IREN and PAUL D. AMER University of Delaware AND PHILLIP T. CONRAD Temple University Transport layer protocols provide for end-to-end communication between two or more hosts. This paper presents a tutorial on transport layer concepts and terminology, and a survey of transport layer services and protocols. The transport layer protocol TCP is used as a reference point, and compared and contrasted with nineteen other protocols designed over the past two decades. The service and protocol features of twelve of the most important protocols are summarized in both text and tables. Categories and Subject Descriptors: C.2.0 [Computer-Communication Networks]: General—Data communications; Open System Interconnection Reference Model (OSI); C.2.1 [Computer-Communication Networks]: Network Architecture and Design—Network communications; Packet-switching networks; Store and forward networks; C.2.2 [Computer-Communication Networks]: Network Protocols; Protocol architecture (OSI model); C.2.5 [Computer- Communication Networks]: Local and Wide-Area Networks General Terms: Networks Additional Key Words and Phrases: Congestion control, flow control, transport protocol, transport service, TCP/IP 1. INTRODUCTION work of routers, bridges, and communi- cation links that moves information be- In the OSI 7-layer Reference Model, the tween hosts. A good transport layer transport layer is the lowest layer that service (or simply, transport service) al- operates on an end-to-end basis be- lows applications to use a standard set tween two or more communicating of primitives and run on a variety of hosts. This layer lies at the boundary networks without worrying about differ- between these hosts and an internet- ent network interfaces and reliabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions to Chapter 2
    CS413 Computer Networks ASN 4 Solutions Solutions to Assignment #4 3. What difference does it make to the network layer if the underlying data link layer provides a connection-oriented service versus a connectionless service? [4 marks] Solution: If the data link layer provides a connection-oriented service to the network layer, then the network layer must precede all transfer of information with a connection setup procedure (2). If the connection-oriented service includes assurances that frames of information are transferred correctly and in sequence by the data link layer, the network layer can then assume that the packets it sends to its neighbor traverse an error-free pipe. On the other hand, if the data link layer is connectionless, then each frame is sent independently through the data link, probably in unconfirmed manner (without acknowledgments or retransmissions). In this case the network layer cannot make assumptions about the sequencing or correctness of the packets it exchanges with its neighbors (2). The Ethernet local area network provides an example of connectionless transfer of data link frames. The transfer of frames using "Type 2" service in Logical Link Control (discussed in Chapter 6) provides a connection-oriented data link control example. 4. Suppose transmission channels become virtually error-free. Is the data link layer still needed? [2 marks – 1 for the answer and 1 for explanation] Solution: The data link layer is still needed(1) for framing the data and for flow control over the transmission channel. In a multiple access medium such as a LAN, the data link layer is required to coordinate access to the shared medium among the multiple users (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Media Oriented Systems Transport” Protocol
    TEKA. COMMISSION OF MOTORIZATION AND ENERGETICS IN AGRICULTURE – 2012, Vol. 12, No. 1, 275–279 New elements in vehicle communication “media oriented systems transport” protocol Andrzej Sumorek, Marcin Buczaj Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Poland S u m m a r y. Until recently, no signifi cant breakthroughs two major development trends of communication buses have occurred in the area of functional effi ciency of automo- can be identifi ed. The fi rst of them was to replace the tive vehicle communication protocols. The transmission speed mechanical connection with connections between mul- for “high-speed” communications busses and protocols is still tiple devices using buses (Drive-by-Wire, X-by-Wire) much slower than those of a typical computer network. Neither [14]. The main concern with such a solution is limiting the High-Speed CAN (1 Mbps bandwidth) nor TTP protocol (10 Mbps bandwidth), can be compared to the 1 Gbps band- the failure rate. The second development direction was width that is typical for widely used computer networks. Other to increase the user comfort by integrating multi-media diffi culties are that these vehicle communication networks are subsystems. A simple user interface is frequently imple- nonstandard and frequently use proprietary protocols (e.g., mented to manage complex automotive multimedia sys- communication methods, communication medium and data tems. The integration of various dedicated devices (e.g., formats). In contrast, computer networks have much more ad- telephone, DVD player, MP3 player) into a single system vanced capabilities. They are capable of a range of functions, is diffi cult.
    [Show full text]
  • Logical Link Control and Channel Scheduling for Multichannel Underwater Sensor Networks
    ICST Transactions on Mobile Communications and Applications Research Article Logical Link Control and Channel Scheduling for Multichannel Underwater Sensor Networks Jun Li ∗, Mylene` Toulgoat, Yifeng Zhou, and Louise Lamont Communications Research Centre Canada, 3701 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON. K2H 8S2 Canada Abstract With recent developments in terrestrial wireless networks and advances in acoustic communications, multichannel technologies have been proposed to be used in underwater networks to increase data transmission rate over bandwidth-limited underwater channels. Due to high bit error rates in underwater networks, an efficient error control technique is critical in the logical link control (LLC) sublayer to establish reliable data communications over intrinsically unreliable underwater channels. In this paper, we propose a novel protocol stack architecture featuring cross-layer design of LLC sublayer and more efficient packet- to-channel scheduling for multichannel underwater sensor networks. In the proposed stack architecture, a selective-repeat automatic repeat request (SR-ARQ) based error control protocol is combined with a dynamic channel scheduling policy at the LLC sublayer. The dynamic channel scheduling policy uses the channel state information provided via cross-layer design. It is demonstrated that the proposed protocol stack architecture leads to more efficient transmission of multiple packets over parallel channels. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the packet delay performance of the proposed cross-layer protocol stack architecture with two different scheduling policies: the proposed dynamic channel scheduling and a static channel scheduling. Simulation results show that the dynamic channel scheduling used in the cross-layer protocol stack outperforms the static channel scheduling. It is observed that, when the dynamic channel scheduling is used, the number of parallel channels has only an insignificant impact on the average packet delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Networks
    Second Ed ition Data Networks DIMITRI BERTSEKAS Massachusetts Institute of Technology ROBERT GALLAGER Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology PRENTICE HALL, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 2 Node A Node B Time at B --------- Packet 0 Point-to-Point Protocols and Links 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter first provides an introduction to the physical communication links that constitute the building blocks of data networks. The major focus of the chapter is then data link control (i.e., the point-to-point protocols needed to control the passage of data over a communication link). Finally, a number of point-to-point protocols at the network, transport, and physical layers are discussed. There are many similarities between the point-to-point protocols at these different layers, and it is desirable to discuss them together before addressing the more complex network-wide protocols for routing, flow control, and multiaccess control. The treatment of physical links in Section 2.2 is a brief introduction to a very large topic. The reason for the brevity is not that the subject lacks importance or inherent interest, but rather, that a thorough understanding requires a background in linear system theory, random processes, and modem communication theory. In this section we pro­ vide a sufficient overview for those lacking this background and provide a review and perspective for those with more background. 37 38 Point-to-Point Protocols and Links Chap. 2 In dealing with the physical layer in Section 2.2, we discuss both the actual com­ munication channels used by the network and whatever interface modules are required at the ends of the channels to transmit and receive digital data (see Fig 2.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Particulate Matter Emissions from Hybrid Diesel-Electric and Conventional Diesel Transit Buses: Fuel and Aftertreatment Effects
    TTitle Page PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM HYBRID DIESEL-ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL DIESEL TRANSIT BUSES: FUEL AND AFTERTREATMENT EFFECTS August 2005 JHR 05-304 Project 03-8 Final Report to Connecticut Transit (CTTRANSIT) and Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC) of the Connecticut Cooperative Highway Research Program Britt A. Holmén, Principal Investigator Zhong Chen, Aura C. Davila, Oliver Gao, Derek M. Vikara, Research Assistants Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Connecticut This research was sponsored by the Joint Highway Research Advisory Council (JHRAC) of the University of Connecticut and the Connecticut Department of Transportation and was performed through the Connecticut Transportation Institute of the University of Connecticut. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the University of Connecticut or the Connecticut Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. JHR 05-304 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM HYBRID DIESEL- August 2005 ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL DIESEL TRANSIT BUSES: 6. Performing Organization Code FUEL AND AFTERTREATMENT EFFECTS JH 03-8 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Britt A. Holmén, Zhong Chen, Aura C. Davila, Oliver Gao, Derek M. JHR 05-304 Vikara 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Connecticut N/A Connecticut Transportation Institute 177 Middle Turnpike, U-5202 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Telematics Chapter 3: Physical Layer
    Telematics User Server watching with video Chapter 3: Physical Layer video clip clips Application Layer Application Layer Presentation Layer Presentation Layer Session Layer Session Layer Transport Layer Transport Layer Network Layer Network Layer Network Layer Data Link Layer Data Link Layer Data Link Layer Physical Layer Physical Layer Physical Layer Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen H. Schiller Computer Systems and Telematics (CST) Institute of Computer Science Freie Universität Berlin http://cst.mi.fu-berlin.de Contents ● Design Issues ● Theoretical Basis for Data Communication ● Analog Data and Digital Signals ● Data Encoding ● Transmission Media ● Guided Transmission Media ● Wireless Transmission (see Mobile Communications) ● The Last Mile Problem ● Multiplexing ● Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) ● Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) ● Mobile Telephone System Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen H. Schiller ▪ cst.mi.fu-berlin.de ▪ Telematics ▪ Chapter 3: Physical Layer 3.2 Design Issues Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen H. Schiller ▪ cst.mi.fu-berlin.de ▪ Telematics ▪ Chapter 3: Physical Layer 3.3 Design Issues ● Connection parameters ● mechanical OSI Reference Model ● electric and electronic Application Layer ● functional and procedural Presentation Layer ● More detailed ● Physical transmission medium (copper cable, Session Layer optical fiber, radio, ...) ● Pin usage in network connectors Transport Layer ● Representation of raw bits (code, voltage,…) Network Layer ● Data rate ● Control of bit flow: Data Link Layer ● serial or parallel transmission of bits Physical Layer ● synchronous or asynchronous transmission ● simplex, half-duplex, or full-duplex transmission mode Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen H. Schiller ▪ cst.mi.fu-berlin.de ▪ Telematics ▪ Chapter 3: Physical Layer 3.4 Design Issues Transmitter Receiver Source Transmission System Destination NIC NIC Input Abcdef djasdja dak jd ashda kshd akjsd asdkjhasjd as kdjh askjda Univ.-Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Link Layer
    Data link layer Goals: ❒ Principles behind data link layer services ❍ Error detection, correction ❍ Sharing a broadcast channel: Multiple access ❍ Link layer addressing ❍ Reliable data transfer, flow control: Done! ❒ Example link layer technology: Ethernet Link layer services Framing and link access ❍ Encapsulate datagram: Frame adds header, trailer ❍ Channel access – if shared medium ❍ Frame headers use ‘physical addresses’ = “MAC” to identify source and destination • Different from IP address! Reliable delivery (between adjacent nodes) ❍ Seldom used on low bit error links (fiber optic, co-axial cable and some twisted pairs) ❍ Sometimes used on high error rate links (e.g., wireless links) Link layer services (2.) Flow Control ❍ Pacing between sending and receiving nodes Error Detection ❍ Errors are caused by signal attenuation and noise. ❍ Receiver detects presence of errors signals sender for retrans. or drops frame Error Correction ❍ Receiver identifies and corrects bit error(s) without resorting to retransmission Half-duplex and full-duplex ❍ With half duplex, nodes at both ends of link can transmit, but not at same time Multiple access links / protocols Two types of “links”: ❒ Point-to-point ❍ PPP for dial-up access ❍ Point-to-point link between Ethernet switch and host ❒ Broadcast (shared wire or medium) ❍ Traditional Ethernet ❍ Upstream HFC ❍ 802.11 wireless LAN MAC protocols: Three broad classes ❒ Channel Partitioning ❍ Divide channel into smaller “pieces” (time slots, frequency) ❍ Allocate piece to node for exclusive use ❒ Random
    [Show full text]
  • Is QUIC a Better Choice Than TCP in the 5G Core Network Service Based Architecture?
    DEGREE PROJECT IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Is QUIC a Better Choice than TCP in the 5G Core Network Service Based Architecture? PETHRUS GÄRDBORN KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE Is QUIC a Better Choice than TCP in the 5G Core Network Service Based Architecture? PETHRUS GÄRDBORN Master in Communication Systems Date: November 22, 2020 Supervisor at KTH: Marco Chiesa Supervisor at Ericsson: Zaheduzzaman Sarker Examiner: Peter Sjödin School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Host company: Ericsson AB Swedish title: Är QUIC ett bättre val än TCP i 5G Core Network Service Based Architecture? iii Abstract The development of the 5G Cellular Network required a new 5G Core Network and has put higher requirements on its protocol stack. For decades, TCP has been the transport protocol of choice on the Internet. In recent years, major Internet players such as Google, Facebook and CloudFlare have opted to use the new QUIC transport protocol. The design assumptions of the Internet (best-effort delivery) differs from those of the Core Network. The aim of this study is to investigate whether QUIC’s benefits on the Internet will translate to the 5G Core Network Service Based Architecture. A testbed was set up to emulate traffic patterns between Network Functions. The results show that QUIC reduces average request latency to half of that of TCP, for a majority of cases, and doubles the throughput even under optimal network conditions with no packet loss and low (20 ms) RTT. Additionally, by measuring request start and end times “on the wire”, without taking into account QUIC’s shorter connection establishment, we believe the results indicate QUIC’s suitability also under the long-lived (standing) connection model.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Networking Solutions
    Field Networking Solutions Courtesy of Steven Engineering, Inc. ! 230 Ryan Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080-6370 ! Main Office: (650) 588-9200 ! Outside Local Area: (800) 258-9200 ! www.stevenengineering.com TYPES OF FIELDBUS NETWORKS* Field Networking 101 Features and Benefits of Fieldbus Networks The combination of intelligent field devices, digital bus networks, and various open communications protocols Fieldbus networks provide an array of features and benefits that make them an excellent choice is producing extraordinary results at process plants in nearly all process control environments. around the world. Compared to conventional technology, fieldbus networks deliver the following benefits: Just as our ability to retrieve, share, and analyze data Reduced field wiring costs has increased tremendously by use of the Internet and - Two wires from the control room to many devices PC network technology in our homes and at our desk- Reduced commissioning costs tops, so has our ability to control and manage our - Less time and personnel needed to perform process plants improved. Digital connectivity in process I/O wiring checkouts - No time spent calibrating intermediate signals manufacturing plants provides an infrastructure for the (such as 4-20mA signals) - Digital values are delivered directly from field flow of real-time data from the process level, making it devices, increasing accuracy available throughout our enterprise networks. This data Reduced engineering/operating costs is being used at all levels of the enterprise to provide - Much smaller space required for panels, I/O racks, and connectivity boxes increased process monitoring and control, inventory and - Fewer I/O cards and termination panels for materials planning, advanced diagnostics, maintenance control system equipment - Lower power consumption by control system planning, and asset management.
    [Show full text]