Upland Flushes, Fens and Swamps (Uk Bap Priority Habitat)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upland Flushes, Fens and Swamps (Uk Bap Priority Habitat) UPLAND FLUSHES, FENS AND SWAMPS (UK BAP PRIORITY HABITAT) Summary This priority habitat takes in a number of wetland communities in the uplands, from swamp vegetation at the margins of lochs or in the waters of sluggish streams, through tall fens with mixtures of herbs and rushes, to sedge-dominated mires and bryophyte springs. Each has a characteristic set of species. In the tall fens and swamps the dominant plants are large sedges, rushes and, on neutral soils, herbs. On more acid soils mosses and herbs are more common. The sedge mires can consist of any of many species either alone or in combination. Small herbs are common in these mires, depending on the base-status of the water. Bryophyte springs vary from the almost pure mats of a few specific mosses to intricate, brightly-coloured mixtures of species, dotted with small herbs. All these types of vegetation rely on a wet but not stagnant habitat where water flows laterally over or through the ground. Since all are more common where the climate is cool and wet, they are most widespread in the uplands. All of these communities are common throughout the uplands, though the montane flushes and springs are confined to the upper slopes of the higher hills. Swamps, fens and sedge mires can be found a few metres above sea level as well as on montane plateaux and hill tops. These communities add a great deal to the structural and floristic diversity of upland vegetation, and are also home to a great many rare species. Wetland communities of all types are host to large numbers of invertebrates, especially flies and spiders, and so are valuable feeding grounds for many insectivorous birds, including waders. Most of these Upland flushes, fens and swamps are open to grazing animals and probably need light grazing to maintain the structure and species diversity except at the very highest altitudes. What is it? The Upland flushes, fens and swamps priority habitat includes a very wide range of plant communities, from tall swards of herbs, rushes and sedges to mats and patches of bryophytes. What they all have in common is an association with water either in flooded ditches, channels or valley floors, or emerging from and flowing gently over the surface of the ground. For the purpose of description this varied priority habitat is split into 5 subdivisions related to NVC communities: Swamps Terrestrial swamp NVC communities – as opposed to those where the plants grow in deep water – are included in this priority habitat although they are also represented by the aquatic priority types where they form a very narrow waterside strip, or emergent stands in open water. They consist of species-poor, in some stands single-species, swards of bottle sedge Carex rostrata, bladder sedge C. vesicaria, great horsetail Equisetum fluviatile and common spike-rush Eleocharis palustris. In the more diverse examples there is an array of tall herbs such as bogbean Menyanthes trifoliata, marsh cinquefoil Potentilla palustris, bog pondweed Potamogeton polygonifolius, water mint Mentha aquatica, marsh marigold Caltha palustris and lesser spearwort Ranunculus flammula. Tall fen communities These are assemblages of plants such as soft rush Juncus effusus and sharp-flowered rush J. acutiflorus, purple moor-grass Molinia caerulea, flag iris Iris pseudacorus and herbs including meadowsweet Filipendula ulmaria, wild angelica Angelica sylvestris, meadow buttercup Ranunculus acris, R. flammula, Mentha aquatica, water avens Geum rivale, marsh bedstraw Galium palustre, ragged robin Lychnis flos-cuculi and common valerian Valeriana officinalis. The vegetation generally grows tall and lush. There is a sparse underlayer of bryophytes such as Calliergonella cuspidata, Rhizomnium punctatum and Brachythecium rutabulum. Sedge mires or flushes Shorter in stature than the tall fens, these are assemblages of sedges and other small species. Any of a number of sedges may dominate, including common sedge Carex nigra, star sedge C. echinata, carnation sedge C. panicea, common yellow sedge C. viridula ssp. oedocarpa, dioecious sedge C. dioica, C. rostrata, white sedge C. curta and russet sedge C. saxatilis. They vary from species-poor assemblages on acid substrates, with an underlayer of Sphagnum fallax, S. palustre and Polytrichum commune and a sparse interleaving of Ranunculus flammula, tormentil Potentilla erecta and marsh violet Viola palustris, to species- rich swards on base-rich soils with a flora including butterwort Pinguicula vulgaris, yellow saxifrage Saxifraga aizoides, purple saxifrage S. oppositifolia and alpine meadow-rue Thalictrum alpinum and a characteristic suite of bryophytes consisting of Campylium stellatum, Scorpidium scorpioides, Drepanocladus revolvens and Blindia acuta. Mesotrophic Carex rostrata mires may include tall herb species such as Mentha aquatica, Lychnis flos- cuculi, Filipendula ulmaria, Menyanthes trifoliata and Potentilla palustris. Potamogeton polygonifolius soakways, with or without marsh St. John’s wort Hypericum elodes, and Ranunculus omiophyllus-Montia fontana rill communities also belong here. Springs Springs mark out the sites where water actually emerges from the ground. They almost all consist of mats and patches of brightly-coloured bryophytes dotted with small vascular plants. Characteristic bryophytes of this habitat include the mosses Philonotis fontana, Bryum pseudotriquetrum, Dicranella palustris and Sphagnum denticulatum, and the liverwort Scapania undulata. Where the irrigating water is base-rich the most common species is the moss Palustriella commutata. Associated vascular plants include blinks Montia fontana, opposite-leaved golden saxifrage Chrysosplenium oppositifolium, starry saxifrage Saxifraga stellaris and Viola palustris. At high altitudes where snow lies late in spring, Anthelia julacea forms patches of its tiny, silvery shoots, and Pohlia wahlenbergii var. glacialis grows in spreads of apple-green leaves which have a waxy bloom. Valley mire The M21 Narthecium-Sphagnum valley mire is also partly within this priority type where it occurs in the unenclosed uplands. Its flora, with cross-leaved heath Erica tetralix, ling Calluna vulgaris, bog myrtle Myrica gale, white beak-sedge Rhynchospora alba and peat- forming Sphagnum mosses, is very different from that of the other flush, fen and swamp communities, but it shares the habitat of laterally moving water in a saturated soil. How do I recognise it? This priority type encompasses a wide range of plant communities, united by their need for a constantly wet habitat. They vary from valley mires and rushy pastures to herb-rich swards, sedge mires and montane springs and flushes. Sedges, rushes and bryophytes are the predominant species. This priority type includes some of our most species-rich vegetation and is home to some of our rarest species. These communities are also a valuable habitat for upland invertebrates and birds. For the most part they are maintained by light grazing. Differentiation from other Priority Habitats The flushes that occur only in the uplands: M7, M8, M11, M12 and M31-M38 belong by definition to this priority habitat. Those with a wider altitudinal range belong to this priority habitat where they occur in the unenclosed uplands (but not on limestone pavement) and in the Lowland fens priority habitat where they occur in enclosed agricultural lowlands. Definition in relation to other habitat classifications Classification Habitat types belonging to this UK BAP priority habitat M4-6 (examples in unenclosed uplands), M7-8 (all examples), M9 (examples in unenclosed uplands), M10 (examples in unenclosed uplands but not on limestone pavements), M11-12 (all examples), M14 (in unenclosed uplands), M21, M23a, M25c (in unenclosed uplands), M27 (in unenclosed uplands but not on limestone pavements), M28-29 (in unenclosed uplands), M31-38 (all examples), S3 (upland examples not very closely associated with NVC aquatic habitats), S9-10 (in unenclosed uplands), S11, S19 (upland examples not very closely associated with aquatic habitats), S27 (upland examples not dominated by Phragmites), U6 (flushed, herb-rich forms – no NVC sub-community exists to accommodate these), and non-NVC Neutral small sedge flush (examples in unenclosed upland areas). M4-12, 21, 23, 27, 31-34, 37-38, S27 and U6 are included in the Scottish Biodiversity List. Phase 1 E2, E3 and F1 (examples in unenclosed upland areas). All examples of this priority habitat which conform to the NVC UK BAP broad communities described above belong in the broad habitat - Fen, habitat marsh and swamp. Definition in relation to legislative classifications Classification Habitat types belonging to this UK BAP priority habitat H7140 (upland examples), H7150 (examples which are not on Habitats Directive deep peat in bog ombrotrophic habitats), H7220 (all examples) Annex I and H7230 (upland examples). Alkaline fen Alpine flush Sub-alpine flushes SNH SSSI habitat Ladder fen features Spring-head, rill and flush This priority habitat can also be part of a mosaic of two or more SSSI habitat features classed together as the Upland assemblage SSSI habitat feature. Where is it? The Upland flushes, fens and swamps are communities of wet habitats. These vary from: springs, where water emerges from the ground at varying speeds from a slow trickle to a powerful gush, to stony and soily flushes where water seeps or runs over the surface of the ground, to fens and swamps where the water moves slowly, if at all, through deep soil. As surface water is a product of a cool and
Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
    Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 199 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis 200 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 201 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis 202 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan ) New Flora of the British IslesSecond Ed Epilobium angustifolium Senecio jacobaea), Galium aparine Rumex obtusifoliusCirsium spp.) Ulmus glabra Quercus spp 203 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis Fig Handbook for Phase 1 habitat survey − a technique for environmental audit. New Flora of the British Isles 204 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 205 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis 206 Cairngorms National Park Local Development Plan 207 Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Red List of Bryophytes in Britain
    ConservationNews Revised Red List distinguished from Extinct. This Red List uses Extinct in the Wild (EW) – a taxon is Extinct version 3.1 of the categories and criteria (IUCN, in the Wild when it is known to survive only in A revised Red List of 2001), along with guidelines produced to assist cultivation or as a naturalized population well with their interpretation and use (IUCN, 2006, outside the past range. There are no taxa in this 2008), further guidelines for using the system category in the British bryophyte flora. bryophytes in Britain at a regional level (IUCN, 2003), and specific Regionally Extinct (RE) – a taxon is regarded guidelines for applying the system to bryophytes as Regionally Extinct in Britain if there are no (Hallingbäck et al., 1995). post-1979 records and all known localities have Conservation OfficerNick Hodgetts presents the latest revised Red List for How these categories and criteria have been been visited and surveyed without success, or interpreted and applied to the British bryophyte if colonies recorded post-1979 are known to bryophytes in Britain. Dumortiera hirsuta in north Cornwall. Ian Atherton flora is summarized below, but anyone interested have disappeared. It should be appreciated that in looking into them in more depth should regional ‘extinction’ for bryophytes is sometimes he first published Red List of et al. (2001) and Preston (2010), varieties and consult the original IUCN documents, which less final than for other, more conspicuous bryophytes in Britain was produced subspecies have been disregarded. are available on the IUCN website (www. organisms. This may be because bryophytes are in 2001 as part of a Red Data Book 1980 has been chosen as the cut-off year to iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories- easily overlooked, or because their very efficient for bryophytes (Church et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Saxifragaceae Saxifrage Family
    Saxifragaceae Page | 921 saxifrage family About 700 species in 40 genera comprise this family of herbs and shrubs. Nova Scotia has several representative species, ranging from the highland saxifrages to deciduous forest mitreworts. Calyx and corolla are 4-5-merous. Sepals appear to be lobes of the hypanthium. Petals are variable in size and dissection. Stamens are equal in number or double the number of sepals and petals. Pistils number one or three; carpels 2–5, united basally to form a compound ovary, which may be deeply lobed. Fruit is dehiscent. Leaves are alternate with or without stipules, basal or cauline. Several genera are cultivated, but not persisting outside of cultivation. Key to genera A. Leaves opposite, cauline; plant sprawling; flowers 4-merous; petals absent. Chrysosplenium aa. Leaves mostly in a basal rosette, or very small and alternate; plants erect; B flowers 5-merous; petals present. B. Flowers solitary; stamens equal in number to the petals. Parnassia bb. Flowers several to numerous; stamens double the number of petals. C C. Leaves small, crowded, sessile or nearly so. Saxifraga cc. Leaves mostly basal, on long petioles. D D. Leaves serrate; petals entire; capsule beak Tiarella acute. dd. Leaves crenate; petals finely cleft; capsule beak Mitella obtuse. Chrysosplenium L. Plants of cool regions, all 40 species have minute flowers. Petals are absent; calyx is four-merous. Flowers are perfect and perigynous. Hypanthium has eight lobes in its centre, with 4–8 stamens attached. Perennial creeping herbs, they are freely branched, their leaves simple. 3-81 Saxifragaceae Page | 922 Chrysosplenium americanum Schwein. Golden saxifrage; dorine d'Amérique A smooth, nearly succulent plant, it has many trailing branches, forming thick mats.
    [Show full text]
  • David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD
    DDAAVVIIDD CCLLEEMMEENNTTSS EECCOOLLOOGGYY LLTTDD MERTHYR TYDFIL COUNTY BOROUGH SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION SO 00SW/2: RHYDYCAR WEST SURVEY & ASSESSMENT FOR SINC DESIGNATION May 2006 David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD Site Name: RHYDYCAR WEST Grid Ref(s): SO 045047 Site No.: SO 00SW/2 SO 033050 (W); 038053 (N); 053036 (E); 034031 (S) Status: Candidate Date: July 2002 July 2002: Provisional site; boundary identified from available Proposed Date: desk-top sources only; requires confirmation by survey. Confirmed Date: Dec 2005: Site surveyed and assessed for designation; designation boundary identified. Summary - Reasons for Selection/Interest of Site: Very extensive mosaic of ‘ffridd’ habitats and former mine spoil supporting complex of semi- upland and lowland habitats, partly contained within conifer plantation. Main components are ancient semi-natural woodland fragments, other semi-natural woodlands (mainly upland oak, Quercus sp) together with wet woodlands of alder (Alnus glutinosa), wet heathland, dry heathland, marshy grassland and semi-improved neutral grasslands. Also there are some bracken slopes, scrub, small ponds, streams and sections of dismantled railway. There are areas of semi- improved acid grasslands to the south especially. The habitats intergrade to form a complex mosaic, and may therefore also include some small areas of improved or low diversity semi- improved grassland, but any such areas are a very minor component. Great crested newt occurs in small pools within the SINC, and noctule and pipistrelle bats have both been recorded. Water vole may occur and a small badger sett is present.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset's Ecological Network
    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of a Raised Bog and Adjacent Forest in Lithuania
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 63–67, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Lepidoptera of a raised bog and adjacent forest in Lithuania DALIUS DAPKUS Department of Zoology, Vilnius Pedagogical University, Studentų 39, LT–2004 Vilnius, Lithuania; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species, communities, raised bog, wet forest, Lithuania Abstract. Studies on nocturnal Lepidoptera were carried out on the Laukėnai raised bog and the adjacent wet forest in 2001. Species composition and abundance were evaluated and compared. The species richness was much higher in the forest than at the bog. The core of each lepidopteran community was composed of 22 species with an abundance of higher than 1.0% of the total catch. Tyrpho- philous Hypenodes humidalis (22.0% of all individuals) and Nola aerugula (13.0%) were the dominant species in the raised bog community, while tyrphoneutral Pelosia muscerda (13.6%) and Eilema griseola (8.3%) were the most abundant species at the forest site. Five tyrphobiotic and nine tyrphophilous species made up 43.4% of the total catch on the bog, and three and seven species, respectively, at the forest site, where they made up 9.2% of all individuals. 59% of lepidopteran species recorded on the bog and 36% at the forest site were represented by less than five individuals. The species compositions of these communities showed a weak similarity. Habitat preferences of the tyrphobiontic and tyrphophilous species and dispersal of some of the species between the habi- tats are discussed. INTRODUCTION (1996). Ecological terminology is that of Mikkola & Spitzer (1983), Spitzer & Jaroš (1993), Spitzer (1994): tyrphobiontic The insect fauna of isolated raised bogs in Europe is species are species that are strongly associated with peat bogs, unique in having a considerable portion of relict boreal while tyrphophilous taxa are more abundant on bogs than in and subarctic species (Mikkola & Spitzer, 1983; Spitzer adjacent habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And
    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • With Description of Immature Stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) 187-196 ©Ges
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2001 Band/Volume: 32 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuras Tomás, Benes Jiri, Konvicka Martin, Honc Lubomír Artikel/Article: Life histories of Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana with description of immature stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) 187-196 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (June 2001) 32(1/2): 187-196, Colour plate XII, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 Life histories of Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana with description of immature stages (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) by To m á s Ku ras , J ir í Benes , M a r t in Ko n v ic k a & L u b o m ír H o n c received 19.111.2001 Summary: The life cycies, morphology and behaviour of the immature stages of the ringlets Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana inhabiting the Hruby Jesenik Mts. (= Alt- vatergebirge; Czech Republic) are presented. Immature stages of E. sudetica are described here for the first time. Both species have been reared to maturity from eggs laid by females caught in the wild. Out of accord with hitherto attainments, both species preferred Festuca supina as the main host plant (in choice experiments, E. epiphron preferred Avenella flexuosa). In rearing experiments, the species overwintered only once and finished their development within a one-year period. Highest mortality of individuals appeared during overwintering of L2- [E. sudetica) and L3-larvae (E epiphron). Introduction Five species of the species-rich holarctic genus Erebia Dalman, 1816, which is renown for high diversity in alpine and arctic habitats, frequent endemism and subspecific differentiation (Warren, 1936), occur in the HrubyJesenik Mts.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Fruticose Species
    Appendix 5.2-1 Vegetation Technical Appendix APPENDIX 5.2‐1 Vegetation Technical Appendix Contents Section Page Ecological Land Classification ............................................................................................................ A5.2‐1‐1 Geodatabase Development .............................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐1 Vegetation Community Mapping ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ A5.2‐1‐3 Limitations of Ecological Land Classification .................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Field Data Collection ......................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Supplementary Results ..................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐4 Rare Vegetation Species and Rare Ecological Communities ........................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Supplementary Desktop Results ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Field Methods ................................................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐16 Supplementary Results ................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐17 Weed Species
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised List of Nationally Rare Bryophytes
    ConservationNews Revised list of nationally rare bryophytes v Timmia megapolitana. Ron Porley Committee, revises the list of nationally rare Table 1. Species now recorded in more than 15 10-km squares since 1950 species. It is a companion to the earlier revision A revised of scarce species (Preston, 2006) which provides H, hornwort; L, liverwort; M, moss. more background to the use of these terms. Atlas total Current total % of Atlas total The starting point for this revision is the list of nationally rare bryophyte species and subspecies H Phaeoceros carolinianus 4 17 425 list of L Barbilophozia kunzeana 10 17 170 which can be extracted from the spreadsheet of Conservation Designations for UK taxa on the L Fossombronia fimbriata 10 17 170 nationally Joint Nature Conservation Committee’s (JNCC) L Leiocolea fitzgeraldiae – 22 – website (www.jncc.gov.uk). I have brought the L Leiocolea gillmanii 13 18 138 taxonomy into line with that of the new Census L Lophozia perssonii 12 23 192 rare Catalogue (Hill et al., 2008), and updated the L Nardia breidleri 11 20 182 list to include newly discovered taxa and new L Scapania curta 15 16 107 10-km square records. The 10-km square totals L Scapania paludicola 4 19 475 bryophytes are based on records made from Britain (v.-cc. L Scapania paludosa 14 22 157 1–112) from 1950 onwards. M Bryum gemmilucens 10 20 200 The changes to the list are summarized below M Bryum knowltonii 13 19 146 and a complete new list of nationally rare species Chris Preston presents a M Bryum kunzei 8 16 200 then follows.
    [Show full text]